Heterologous Vaccination Regimens Research Articles

Comparative assessment of the immunogenicity of various revaccination regimens against the SARS-CoV-2

Along with efficacy and safety, it is extremely important to study the severity of humoral and cellular immunity during not only vaccination, but also revaccination against the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndromerelated CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).Aim. To compare the immunogenicity (humoral and cellular immunity) of various (heterologous and homologous) revaccination regimens against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a prospective observational study.Material and methods. In individuals aged ≥18 years, in the absence of contraindications to vaccination, two following types of vaccines were used for primary vaccination and revaccination: Gam-COVIDVac and CoviVac. Group I patients received Gam-COVID-Vac at each stage of primary and secondary vaccination; patients of group II — Gam-COVID-Vac at each stage of primary vaccination, CoviVac at each stage of re-vaccination; patients of group III — CoviVac at each stage of primary vaccination and Gam-COVID-Vac at each stage of revaccination; patients of group IV — CoviVac at each stage of primary and secondary vaccination. All participants (at each stage of vaccination, revaccination and 12 months after the primary vaccination) were determined the level of IgG to the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein and T-cell immunity to SARSCoV-2.Results. The maximum level of IgG at the second stage of revaccination was observed in groups I and III. In addition, in groups I, III and IV, a significant (p<0,0001) increase in IgG level by the second stage of revaccination was noted, the most pronounced in group III. In addition, there was a significantly (p<0,05) higher level of IgG at I and II stages of revaccination (Visit 3 and 4) among those vaccinated with Gam-COVID-Vac — 520 and 540 BAU/ml, respectively, compared with group IV vaccinated with CoviVac — 467 and 478 BAU/ml, respectively. The maximum and significant increase in active T-cells by the second stage of revaccination (Visit 4) was noted in groups I (p<0,0001) and III (p<0,0022) of vaccinated individuals, where it amounted to 11 and 12, respectively, which allows to consider the result positive (>8). At the same time, the level of active T cells responding to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid Ag stimulation by Visit 4 (stage II of revaccination) was noted in groups II (14,5) and IV (12).Conclusion. The use of the Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine as a booster dose in both homologous and heterologous vaccination regimens against the SARS-CoV-2 virus is most effective for stimulation and humoral and T-cell post-vaccination response.

Reactogenicity of various COVID-19 vaccination regimens

During the spread of an increasing number of new variants of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it is extremely important not only to assess the immunogenicity and efficacy, butalso the safety of various combinations of vaccines. Excessive immune response and associated signs and symptoms may occur with varying frequency as expected from the use of vaccines.Aim. To compare the reactogenicity of various (heterologous and homologous) vaccination regimens in a prospective observational study.Material and methods. In individuals aged ≥18 years, in the absence of contraindications to vaccination, two types of vaccines were used at primary vaccination and revaccination: Gam-COVID-Vac and CoviVac: group I (n=97) — Gam-COVID-Vac at each stage of primary and booster vaccination ; group II (n=7) — Gam-COVID-Vck at each stage of primary vaccination, CoviVac at each stage of revaccination; group III (n=42) — CoviVac at each stage of primary vaccination, Gam-COVID-Vac at each stage of revaccination; group IV (n=38) — CoviVac at each stage of primary and secondary vaccination. In all participants, the dynamics of IgG to SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein receptor-binding domain and T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 were determined over time. To control the plasma hemostasis, the method of dynamic thrombophotometry was used. Local and systemic adverse events were assessed.Results. The number of vaccinated individuals with a rise in body temperature above 370 C after the 1st stage of revaccination was significantly (p<0,05) more in group I (37,5%) and group II (57,1%) compared with vaccinated persons of IV group. At the same time, after the 2nd stage of revaccination, in general, a smaller percentage of vaccinated persons with hyperthermia was noted. In group I, a higher percentage of persons (22,9%) complaining of the appearance of weakness after stage I of revaccination was noted compared to vaccinated persons of group IV — 5,2%. An increase in the fibrin clot growth rate was noted in group III at the stage of revaccination.Conclusion. The use of various revaccination schemes (homologous and heterologous) was not associated with the development of serious adverse events. The resulting local and systemic reactions were shortlived and did not require hospitalization. More pronounced systemic reactions were noted in the form of a short-term fever and weakness when using the Gam-COVID-Vac. No cases of arterial or venous thrombosis were registered during the follow-up period.

Humoral Immune Response of Heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and mRNA-1273 Prime-Boost Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Korea.

The immunogenicity of a heterologous vaccination regimen consisting of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (a chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine) followed by mRNA-1273 (a lipid-nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), specifically the omicron variant (B.1.1.529), is poorly studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the neutralizing antibody activity and immunogenicity of heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and mRNA-1273 prime-boost vaccination against wild-type (BetaCoV/Korea/KCDC03/2020), alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 in Korea. A 50% neutralizing dilution (ND50) titer was determined in serum samples using the plaque reduction neutralization test. Antibody titer decreased significantly at 3 months compared with that at 2 weeks after the 2nd dose. On comparing the ND50 titers for the above-mentioned variants of concerns, it was observed that the ND50 titer for the omicron variant was the lowest. This study provides insights into cross-vaccination effects and can be useful for further vaccination strategies in Korea.

REACTOGENICITY OF HETEROLOGOUS MRNA-BASED COVID-19 VACCINE BOOSTER IN YOUNG ADULTS IN INDONESIA- A SHORT COMMUNICATION.

Heterologous priming with the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) and boosting with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna or Pfizer) is currently recommended in Indonesia. The reactogenicity data of these heterologous vaccine regimens are not entirely available, particularly in young adults. The present study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the solicited local and systemic reactions in the first seven days post-vaccination either with Moderna or Pfizer vaccine among previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac. An electronic-based cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students at the Pelita Harapan University, Banten, Indonesia, who received mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine following two doses of CoronaVac. Samples were collected using a cluster sampling technique. Comparison between groups was performed by Fisher's exact test. A total of 72 participants, 23 (32%) of which received the Moderna vaccine and 49 (68%) received the Pfizer vaccine, were included in this study. The median age of participants was 21 (IQR 19-22) years old. The most common local and systemic events for mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines were injection site pain, fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia, and arthralgia. Solicited local and systemic reactions were reported more frequently in Moderna recipients than Pfizer recipients. Most local and systemic reactions were graded as mild to moderate and did not lead to hospitalization. The reactogenicity of the heterologous prime-boost with CoronaVac and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine booster among young adults is reassuring, and no unexpected concerns were identified.

Heterologous prime-boost immunization with ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2: reactogenicity and immunogenicity in a prospective cohort study

ObjectivesRegarding reactogenicity and immunogenicity, heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens are considered as an alternative to conventional immunization schemes. MethodsIndividuals receiving either heterologous (ChAdOx1-S [AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK]/BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech, Mainz, Germany]; n = 306) or homologous (messenger RNA [mRNA]-1273 [Moderna, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA]; n = 139) vaccination were asked to participate when receiving their second dose. Reactogenicity was assessed after 1 month, immunogenicity after 1, 3, and/or 6 months, including a third dose, through SARS-CoV-2 antispike immunoglobulin G, surrogate virus neutralization test, and a plaque reduction neutralization test against the Delta (B.1.167.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529; BA.1) variants of concern. ResultsThe overall reactogenicity was lower after heterologous vaccination. In both cohorts, SARS-CoV-2 antispike immunoglobulin G concentrations waned over time with the heterologous vaccination demonstrating higher neutralizing activity than homologous mRNA vaccination after 3 months to low neutralizing levels in the Delta plaque reduction neutralization test after 6 months. At this point, 3.2% of the heterologous and 11.4% of the homologous cohort yielded low neutralizing activity against Omicron. After a third dose of an mRNA vaccine, ≥99% of vaccinees demonstrated positive neutralizing activity against Delta. Depending on the vaccination scheme and against Omicron, 60% to 87.5% of vaccinees demonstrated positive neutralizing activity. ConclusionChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 vaccination demonstrated an acceptable reactogenicity and immunogenicity profile. A third dose of an mRNA vaccine is necessary to maintain neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2. However, variants of concern-adapted versions of the vaccines would be desirable.

Self-reported adverse events after 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine in Korea.

In Korea, a national coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination program was implemented, including 4 vaccines against COVID-19. A text messaging-based survey, in addition to a passive adverse event reporting system, was launched to quickly report unusual symptoms post-vaccination. This study compared the frequency of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination based on the vaccine type and the type of 2-dose regimen (homologous or heterologous). Self-reported adverse events were collected through a text-message survey for 7 days after each vaccination. This study included 50,950 vaccine recipients who responded to the survey at least once. Informed consent to receive surveys via text was obtained from the vaccine recipients on the date of first vaccination. The recipients of mRNA vaccines reported local and systemic reactions 1.6 times to 2.8 times more frequently after dose 2 than after dose 1 (p<0.001), whereas ChAdOx1-S recipients reported significantly fewer local and systemic reactions after dose 2 than after dose 1 (p<0.001). Local and systemic reactions were approximately 2 times and 4 times more frequent for heterologous vaccination than for BNT162b2/BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1-S/ChAdOx1-S regimens, respectively. Young individuals, female, and those receiving heterologous vaccine regimens including ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 vaccines reported more adverse events than older participants, male, and those with homologous vaccine regimens. Although a heterologous regimen, youth, and female sex were associated with a higher risk of adverse reactions after COVID-19 vaccination, no critical issues were noted. Active consideration of heterologous schedules based on the evidence of efficacy and safety appears desirable.

1948. Evaluation of a heterologous booster vaccine regimen: Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA booster vaccine following priming with Novavax NVX-CoV2373

Abstract Background In the United States, booster vaccines for persons 18 years and older were approved under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in September 2021. Waning immunity following SARS-CoV-2 primary vaccination series led to recommendations for booster vaccination. Emerging data suggest that providing boosters different from the primary series (heterologous vaccination) may provide a broader immune response than boosting with the same vaccine (homologous vaccination). CDC recommended the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 30-μg mRNA booster vaccine to clinical trial participants &amp;gt;6 months post study vaccines if not planned for boosting within the study. Methods We conducted an observational study of persons who received 2 doses of Novavax protein-based NVX-CoV2373 vaccine 21 days apart, in a Phase 3 clinical trial, and subsequently received a Pfizer BNT162b2 booster vaccine under EUA. Serologic assays, including the Roche anti-nucleocapsid (N) IgG and anti-Spike (S) IgG, were performed on blood collected pre-booster (D0) and on days 18 (D18) and 34 (D34) post-booster vaccine. The anti-S IgG geometric means (GMTs) were calculated over study time points. Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed to compare anti-S IgG response between D0 and D18 and D0 and D34. Results Of 26 participants enrolled, 16 (57%) were women; the median age was 47 years (range 29-67). Roche anti-N antibodies were negative at all visits. Time from second NVX-CoV2373 vaccine to Pfizer BNT162b2 booster was a median of 10.4 months in 54% of participants and 7 months in 46% of participants. Anti-S IgG GMTs were 222 BAU/ml D0, 24,723 BAU/ml D18, and 24,584 BAU/ml D34 (p&amp;lt; 0.0001 for comparisons of D0 with D18 &amp; D34). Overall, participants tolerated the booster vaccine without significant adverse events. Cell mediated immunity and D614G pseudovirus neutralizing antibody assays are in progress. Figure 1.Anti-S IgG titers pre and post-booster vaccine 16 participants included with all 3-time study time points for comparison. Conclusion Two doses of NVX-CoV2373 vaccine followed by the Pfizer BNT162b2 booster vaccine resulted in ∼100-fold increase in anti-S IgG against SARS-CoV-2. No participant had evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection by anti-N IgG. Two doses of NVX-CoV2373 vaccine followed by one dose of Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for boosting anti-S IgG against SARS-CoV-2. Disclosures Christine Johnston, MD, MPH, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Advisor/Consultant Kerry J. Laing, PhD, Curevo Vaccine: Advisor/Consultant|MaxHealth Biotechnology: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support David M. Koelle, MD, Curevo Vaccines: Advisor/Consultant|MaxHealth LLC: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Immunotec: gift of reagents|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sensei: Grant/Research Support Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD, Abbott: Contract Testing|Cepheid: Contract Testing|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Contract Testing|Hologic: Contract Testing|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Novavax: Contract Testing|Pfizer: Contract Testing Anna Wald, MD, MPH, Aicuris: Advisor/Consultant|Auritec: Advisor/Consultant|Crozet: Advisor/Consultant|DXNow: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|sanofi: Grant/Research Support|VIR: Advisor/Consultant|X-Vax: Advisor/Consultant.

Reactogenicity and Humoral Immune Response after Heterologous Vaxzevria/Comirnaty Vaccination in a Group of Individuals Vaccinated in the AOU Policlinic "G. Martino" (Messina, Italy): A Retrospective Cohort Study.

On 11 June 2021, the Italian Ministry of Health authorized the heterologous vaccination schedule. The goals of our retrospective study were to (a) evaluate the undesirable effects after the administration of Vaxzevria and Comirnaty vaccines; (b) evaluate the antibody response after 28 days from the administration of the second dose; and (c) compare the antibody responses after the homologous and heterologous vaccination regimens. The undesirable effects were collected using a survey; IgG Spike was quantified using the electrochemiluminescence method; the comparison between the antibody responses was carried out using the sample of a homologous vaccine schedule previously analyzed. Pain at the injection site is the most common undesirable effect after the administration of both vaccines (62.1% after Vaxzevria vs. 82.75% after Comirnaty); swelling at the injection site is more frequent after the administration of Vaxzevria than after the administration of Comirnaty: (15.52% vs. 5.17%); headache is more frequent in women than in men for both the vaccination types (p &lt; 0.05); 49.09% of the sample reported IgG Spike ≥ 12,500 U/mL; the antibody titer of the heterologous schedule is higher than that of the homologous vaccination. Our study demonstrated that the undesirable effects after the administration of the second dose are less frequent and less severe than after the administration of the first dose, and that the immunogenicity of the heterologous vaccinations is higher than that of the homologous ones.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine for COVID-19 after a primary regimen with BBIBP-CorV or BNT162b2 vaccines in Lima, Peru.

The administration of a third (booster) dose of COVID-19 vaccines in Peru initially employed the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) mRNA vaccine. The national vaccination program started with healthcare workers (HCW) who received BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccine as primary regimen and elderly people previously immunized with BNT162b2. This study evaluated the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the "booster" dose in these two groups in Lima, Peru. We conducted a prospective cohort study, recruiting participants from November to December of 2021 in Lima, Peru. We evaluated immunogenicity and reactogenicity in HCW and elderly patients previously vaccinated with either two doses of BBIBP-CorV (heterologous regimen) or BTN162b2 (homologous regimen). Immunogenicity was measured by anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels immediately before boosting dose and 14 days later. IgG geometric means (GM) and medians were obtained, and modeled using ANCOVA and quantile regressions. The GM of IgG levels increased significantly after boosting: from 28.5±5.0 AU/mL up to 486.6±1.2 AU/mL (p<0.001) which corresponds to a 17-fold increase. The heterologous vaccine regimen produced higher GM of post-booster anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels, eliciting a 13% increase in the geometric mean ratio (95%CI: 1.02-1.27) and a median difference of 92.3 AU/ml (95%CI: 24.9-159.7). Both vaccine regimens were safe and well tolerated. Previous COVID-19 infection was also associated with higher pre and post-booster IgG GM levels. Although both boosting regimens were highly immunogenic, two doses of BBIBP-CorV boosted with BTN162b2 produced a stronger IgG antibody response than the homologous BNT162b2 regimen in the Peruvian population. Additionally, both regimens were mildly reactogenic and well-tolerated.

Long-Term Antibody Response against SARS-CoV-2 in Health Care Workers: Effectiveness of Homologous and Heterologous Regimens and Their Relation to Systemic Vaccine-Associated Symptoms.

This prospective study provides data on the long-term humoral immunogenicity of a heterologous off-label vaccine regimen combining the adenoviral-vectored ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 from Astra-Zeneca (ChAd) with the mRNA-1273 vaccine from Moderna (m1273) in comparison with two different homologous mRNA vaccine schedules. Of the 316 COVID-19 naïve adult health care workers (HCW) included to complete a survey on vaccine-associated symptoms (VAS), 197 had received the homologous BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT/BNT), 76 the homologous m1273/m1273, and 43 the heterologous ChAd/m1273 vaccine regimen. The concentration of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in plasma 5–7 months after the second vaccine dose was higher in the m1273/m1273 and ChAd/m1273 than the BNT/BNT vaccine group. The frequency of systemic VAS after the first vaccine dose was 86% after ChAd compared with 35% and 39% after BNT and m1273, respectively (p < 0.0001), and after the second vaccine dose, the highest (89%) in the m1273/m1273 group (p < 0.001). Individuals with systemic VAS achieved higher levels of antibodies irrespective of vaccine regimen. In conclusion, VAS serve as a strong predictor of long-term humoral immune response, and the heterologous ChAd/m1273 vaccine regimen provides an at least equal long-term humoral immune response compared with the standard vaccine regimens used in Denmark.

Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous COVID-19 vaccine regimens to deal with product shortage: A randomised clinical trial in an elderly population

ObjectivesIn a context of COVID-19 vaccine shortages, this study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of receiving one dose of Gam-COVID-Vac rAd26 followed by a second COVID-19 vaccine dose of either Gam-COVID-Vac rAd5, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BBIBP-CorV in a cohort of older adults. Study designSingle-centre, randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. MethodsAdults aged ≥65 years who had received one dose of Gam-COVID-Vac rAd26 were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a second-dose COVID-19 vaccination of either Gam-COVID-Vac rAd5, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BBIBP-CorV. The primary outcome was the assessment of the humoral immune response to vaccination (i.e. antibody titres of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at 28 days after second-dose vaccination). In addition, neutralising antibody titres at day 28 for the three schedules were measured. ResultsOf 85 participants who were enrolled in the study between 26 and July 30, 2021, 31 individuals were randomised to receive Gam-COVID-Vac rAd5, 27 to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 27 to BBIBP-CorV. The mean age of participants was 68.2 years (SD 2.9) and 49 (57.6%) were female. Participants who received Gam-COVID-Vac rAd5 and ChAdOx1 nCoV1-19 showed significantly increased anti-S titres at 28 days after second-dose vaccination, but this magnitude of difference was not observed for those who received BBIBP-CorV. The ratio between the geometric mean at day 28 and baseline within each group was 11.8 (6.98–19.89) among patients assigned to Gam-COVID-Vac rAd26/rAd5, 4.81 (2.14–10.81) for the rAd26/ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 1.53 (0.74–3.20) for the rAd26/BBIBP-CorV group. All of the schedules were shown to be safe. ConclusionsThe findings in this study contribute to the scarce information published on the safety and immunogenicity of Gam-COVID-Vac heterologous regimens and will help the development of guidelines and vaccine programme management.

Heterologous Cancer Vaccines plus Checkpoint Inhibitors Show Therapeutic Benefit.

Dual heterologous vaccine regimen and checkpoint inhibitor treatment promotes potent and long-lasting T-cell responses.

Protection against Marburg Virus and Sudan Virus in NHP by an Adenovector-Based Trivalent Vaccine Regimen Is Correlated to Humoral Immune Response Levels.

The Marburg virus (MARV) and Sudan virus (SUDV) belong to the filovirus family. The sporadic human outbreaks occur mostly in Africa and are characterized by an aggressive disease course with high mortality. The first case of Marburg virus disease in Guinea in 2021, together with the increased frequency of outbreaks of Ebola virus (EBOV), which is also a filovirus, accelerated the interest in potential prophylactic vaccine solutions against multiple filoviruses. We previously tested a two-dose heterologous vaccine regimen (Ad26.Filo, MVA-BN-Filo) in non-human primates (NHP) and showed a fully protective immune response against both SUDV and MARV in addition to the already-reported protective effect against EBOV. The vaccine-induced glycoprotein (GP)-binding antibody levels appear to be good predictors of the NHP challenge outcome as indicated by the correlation between antibody levels and survival outcome as well as the high discriminatory capacity of the logistic model. Moreover, the elicited GP-specific binding antibody response against EBOV, SUDV, and MARV remains stable for more than 1 year. Overall, the NHP data indicate that the Ad26.Filo, MVA-BN-Filo regimen may be a good candidate for a prophylactic vaccination strategy in regions at high risk of filovirus outbreaks.

Immune Response of a Heterologous mRNA-1273 Second-Dose Immunization after a First Dose of ChadOx1 against SARS-CoV-2: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Heterologous vaccination regimens could contribute to broadening vaccination coverage. To date, there is little evidence on the effectiveness of a combination of adenoviral COVID-19 vaccines with a second dose of mRNA vaccines. This study aims to evaluate the antibody response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein 25 weeks after vaccination with mRNA-1273 after a first dose of ChAdOx1. A cross-sectional study was conducted collecting sociodemographic data, clinical characteristics, and serological data from among the general population. Antibody levels were expressed as binding antibody units (BAU) per mL (cutoff = 33.8 BAU/mL). Linear regression models were used to assess the relationship between the subjects’ characteristics and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. A total of 229 participants were followed up after a median time of 173 days. The overall anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titer was 729.0 BAU/mL. The multivariable analysis showed that the only factor associated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels was the BMI (p = 0.007), with decreases within the healthy range weight and increases in under- or overweight people. Our results support the use of heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens, as they can guarantee a sustained immune antibody response. More studies are needed to understand the link between BMI and body composition and the immune response to COVID-19 vaccinations.

Protectivity of COVID-19 Vaccines and Its Relationship with Humoral Immune Response and Vaccination Strategy: A One-Year Cohort Study.

This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine schemes, homologous versus heterologous vaccine strategies, and vaccine-induced anti-S-RBD-IgG antibody response in preventing COVID-19 among 942 healthcare workers 1 year after vaccination with the inactivated and/or mRNA vaccines. All participants received the first two primary doses of vaccines, 13.6% of them lacked dose 3, 50.5% dose 4, and 90.3% dose 5. Antibody levels increased with the increase in number of vaccine doses and also in heterologous vaccine regimens. In both inactive, mRNA vaccines and mixed vaccination, infection rates were significantly higher in two-dose-receivers, but lower in four- or five-dose receivers and increasing the total number of vaccine doses resulted in more protection against infection: the three-dose regimen yielded 3.67 times more protection, the four-dose 8 times, and five-dose 27.77 times more protection from COVID-19 infection, compared to any two-dose vaccination regimens. Antibody levels at the end of the first year of four- or five-dose-receivers were significantly higher than two- or three-dose receivers. To conclude, an increased number of total vaccine doses and anti-S-RBD antibody levels increased the protection from COVID-19 infection. Therefore, four or more doses are recommended in 1 year for effective protection, especially in risk groups.

PB2265: OUTCOMES OF COVID-19 INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH B AND PLASMA CELL MALIGNANCIES DURING THE THIRD WAVE IN ARGENTINA: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 is still ongoing. The third wave arrived in Argentina in mid-December 2021 with Omicron variant as the dominant strain representing 84% of sequenced cases. Patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies (HM) have an increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to their immunosuppressed condition secondary to both underlying disease and subsequent treatment, and lower rates of seroconversion after vaccination. Omicron variant shows an unprecedented degree of neutralizing antibody escape and may require a higher level of anti-spike antibodies to prevent severe COVID-19. Aims: To describe characteristics and outcomes of pts with HM and COVID-19 treated in our hospital during the third wave. Methods: Observational, descriptive and retrospective study of adult pts with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma with confirmed COVID-19 infection between 15th Dec 2021 and 7th Feb 2022. We included pts with active disease or who had received anticancer therapy within the last year of COVID-19 infection. Complete vaccination schedule was defined as tree doses or two if the last shot was applied between 14 days and 5 months of COVID-19 infection. IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were analyzed with Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant-test with ≥50 AU/ml as a threshold for positivity. Pts received convalescent plasma according to physician criteria. Results: A total of 38 pts were included. Mean age was 63 years, 60.5% were males and 55% had ≥1 comorbidity. Eleven pts had chronic lymphoid leukemia, 10 indolent B cell lymphoma, 7 aggressive B cell lymphoma and 10 multiple myeloma. Concerning disease status, 39.5% were in complete or partial response, 42.1% had progressive or stable disease and 18.4% were on watch and wait. Nearly half of the pts had received a B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody-based regimen: Rituximab (n=13), Daratumumab (n=4) or Obinutuzumab (n=1); the other half: other anti-myeloma therapy (n=5), chemotherapy (n=3), Ibrutinib (n=3), Venetoclax (n=2) or were untreated (n=7). Twenty-eight were fully vaccinated, 8 had incomplete vaccination and only one was unvaccinated. Heterologous vaccine regimens were used in 21 pts, most frequently vector-based plus mRNA vaccine (n=12). Regarding the last shot, the majority received vector-based vaccine (AstraZeneca Oxford n=21; Sputnik V n=4), followed by mRNA vaccine (BioNTech/Pfizer n=7, Moderna n=4) and inactivated vaccine (Sinopharm n=1). The median time from the last dose and COVID-19 diagnosis was 77 days (IQR 40.5-177). At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, IgG anti-spike antibodies were measured in 16 pts, 4 were no responders and the median level for those who did response was 176,6 AU/ml (IQR 86,6-879,8). Fourteen required hospital admission, among which 8 needed oxygen support and 5 were admitted to ICU. Twelve pts were treated with convalescent plasma, 9 received corticosteroids and 1 tocilizumab. With a median follow up of 42 days, the overall mortality rate was 7.9% (n=3). Follow-up swabs were performed in 21 pts, 18 converted to negative after a mean of 23.4 days (SD +/- 8,4) from the first nasal swab and in 3 it still remained positive after 37, 40 and 45 days respectively. Summary/Conclusion: This report sheds light into outcomes of pts with HM infected with Omicron variant. Our findings show lower fatality rate than reported in previous waves, but still higher than the general vaccinated population. This might be explained because even if fully vaccinated, responsive patients fail to achieve protective levels of anti-spike antibodies.

Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens: living systematic review with network meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens with and without boosting in preventing covid-19 related infection, hospital admission, and death.DesignLiving systematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesWorld...

Characteristics of COVID-19 Breakthrough Infections among Vaccinated Individuals and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review.

We sought to assess breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated individuals by variant distribution and to identify the common risk associations. The PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Embase databases were searched from 2019 to 30 January 2022. The outcome of interest was breakthrough infections (BTIs) in individuals who had completed a primary COVID-19 vaccination series. Thirty-three papers were included in the review. BTIs were more common among variants of concern (VOC) of which Delta accounted for the largest number of BTIs (96%), followed by Alpha (0.94%). In addition, 90% of patients with BTIs recovered, 11.6% were hospitalized with mechanical ventilation, and 0.6% resulted in mortality. BTIs were more common in healthcare workers (HCWs) and immunodeficient individuals with a small percentage found in fully vaccinated healthy individuals. VOC mutations were the primary cause of BTIs. Continued mitigation approaches (e.g., wearing masks and social distancing) are warranted even in fully vaccinated individuals to prevent transmission. Further studies utilizing genomic surveillance and heterologous vaccine regimens to boost the immune response are needed to better understand and control BTIs.

Self-adjuvanting nanovaccines boost lung-resident CD4+ T cell immune responses in BCG-primed mice

Heterologous vaccine regimens could extend waning protection in the global population immunized with Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG). We demonstrate that pulmonary delivery of peptide nanofibers (PNFs) bearing an Ag85B CD4+ T cell epitope increased the frequency of antigen-specific T cells in BCG-primed mice, including heterogenous populations with tissue resident memory (Trm) and effector memory (Tem) phenotype, and functional cytokine recall. Adoptive transfer of dendritic cells pulsed with Ag85B-bearing PNFs further expanded the frequency and functional repertoire of memory CD4+ T cells. Transcriptomic analysis suggested that the adjuvanticity of peptide nanofibers is, in part, due to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns. A single boost with monovalent Ag85B PNF in BCG-primed mice did not reduce lung bacterial burden compared to BCG alone following aerosol Mtb challenge. These findings support the need for novel BCG booster strategies that activate pools of Trm cells with potentially diverse localization, trafficking, and immune function.

Differences in Immunogenicity of Three Different Homo- and Heterologous Vaccination Regimens against SARS-CoV-2.

Background: Due to findings on adverse reactions and clinical efficacy of different vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2, the administration of vaccination regimens containing both adenoviral vector vaccines and mRNA-based vaccines has become common. Data are still needed on the direct comparison of immunogenicity for these different regimens. Methods: We compared markers for immunogenicity (anti-S1 IgG/IgA, neutralizing antibodies, and T-cell response) with three different vaccination regimens (homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 103), or mixture of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 with mRNA-1273 (n = 116) or BNT162b2 (n = 105)) at two time points: the day of the second vaccination as a baseline and 14 days later. Results: All examined vaccination regimens elicited measurable immune responses that were significantly enhanced after the second dose. Homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was markedly inferior in immunogenicity to all other examined regimens after administration of the second dose. Between the heterologous regimens, mRNA-1273 as second dose induced greater antibody responses than BNT162b2, with no difference found for neutralizing antibodies and T-cell response. Discussion: While these findings allow no prediction about clinical protection, from an immunological point of view, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with an mRNA-based vaccine at one or both time points appears preferable to homologous vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Whether or not the demonstrated differences between the heterologous regimens are of clinical significance will be subject to further research.