Catalytic effects of surface groups on porous carbon electrodes are claimed in literature for the redox reactions V(II)/V(III) and V(IV)/V(V). The literature is critically analysed also in relation to work of this group. A method on how to overcome the problem of assessing the electrochemically active surface area on porous electrodes is presented [1]. Applying this method, no catalytic effects for above reactions can be substantiated. It is further pointed out that the parameters electrochemical potential and temperature need to be used to assess electrocatalysis.The main control parameter determining the rate of an electrochemical reaction is the Gibbs free enthalpy of activation, ΔG≠ , in contrast to ΔH≠ for e.g. a heterogeneous surface reaction. This would suggest to clearly define electrocatalysis as the “lowering the activation barrier, ΔG≠ , in an electrochemical reaction” where, in fact, the lowering of ΔG≠ can result from a change in ΔH≠ and/or ΔS≠ (∂ ΔG≠ /∂η=∂ ΔH≠ /∂η−T∂ΔS≠/∂η , as in Figure1). Such a treatment of data of temperature dependent electrochemical reactions has been described in literatures [2,3]. An analysis according to the above-discussed procedures would pin down which quantity is responsible for the lowering of ΔG ≠ that may allow for a better interpretation of the electrocatalytic effect.Using the example of the redox reactions V(II)/V(III) and V(IV)/V(V) the literature was analysed regarding possible catalytic effects of functional groups on carbon electrodes, as in Figure2. The conclusion was that no electrocatalysis of either of these reactions can be confirmed. Observed enhancements of currents can rather be attributed to a change in the effective surface area of the, usually, porous electrode. A method is suggested how such effects can be distinguished from electrocatalysis by using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Figure2 gives an example how EIS data are used for evaluation. In more general terms, the criteria for electrocatalysis were described. Experimentally, an investigation should contain both, measurements of the potential dependence and the temperature dependence since the main parameter in electrocatalysis is the lowering of ΔG≠ . Only then, the respective influence of ΔH≠ and ΔS≠ can be assessed.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported in part by Siemens AG through a research grant and by EPSRC through funding for the North East Centre of Energy Materials (NECEM) (EP/R021503/10).