-A cladistic analysis of 42 two-state characters of the adults of five species in the monophyletic Trimmatom nanus species group resulted in a fully resolved cladogram of 48 steps with a consistency index of 88% (excluding autapomorphies of the group and of terminal taxa). The initial analysis was based on 52 osteological and external two-state characters (although in both cases some characters were analyzed as ordered transformation series). The monophyly of three of the species-T. sagma, T. offucius, and T. nanus-was especially well corroborated, with 19 synapomorphies. Within this subgroup, eight synapomorphies unite T. offucius and T. nanus as sister species. These two species mature at smaller sizes and do not reach the lengths attained by the other three species in the species group. Reexamination of the eight apomorphic character states in similar-sized specimens of their sister species, T. sagma, led to the interpretation of three of the eight character states as being consistent with progenesis. Because these character states are the result of progenetic processes, they are subsumed as a single apomorphy of truncated development. The potential to reassign the position of the progenetic (at this level of analysis) character states on the tree is explored. Some character states involving lack of ossification that cannot be positively identified as synapomorphies of T. offucius and T. nanus by comparison with juveniles of T. sagma and T. zapotes may be interpreted as the result of heterochronic shifts earlier in development. Cladograms therefore can be used on real data sets to identify progenetic characteristics and their level of universality. [Progenesis; phylogeny; heterochrony; truncated development; Trimmatom.] The publication of Gould's (1977) book on ontogeny and phylogeny was followed by an increased interest in heterochronic phenomena (e.g., McNamara [1988] and references cited therein). Numerous workers have investigated the consequences of truncated development at small size, or progenesis (e.g., Alberch et al., 1979; Alberch and Alberch, 1981). Often the detection of heterochronic processes has been probed with a two-taxon statement involving the inferred ancestor or closest relative, which is used to polarize the character states (e.g., Schweitzer et al., 1986; Anstey, 1987: his Tables 2-4). In the case study by Alberch and Alberch (1981), a derived salamander was compared morphologically and ontogenetically with two generalized members of the same genus. In these examples, an implicit (if imprecise) phylogeny is assumed. In many cases, the interpretation given will, in fact, be correct, but for the wrong reasons. In essence, the problem associated with these approaches is the lack of explicit descriptions of the procedure for detecting heterochronic results in nature (Fink, 1982: 254). There is no mechanism to distinguish the distribution of plesiomorphy and apomorphy on the phylogenetic tree because there is no tree to begin with, and therefore assessments of relative plesiomorphy or apomorphy cannot be made. As Fink and others have shown in theoretical models, such distinction is essential to protocols for research on heterochrony (Fink, 1982: his Figs. 1, 2, 1988; Kluge and Strauss,