The Drosophila melanogaster Y chromosome, comprising approximately an eighth of the total DNA content of males, appears much like a genetic junkyard filled with long stretches of heterochromatic repeats. Aside from the six giant lampbrush loops that are required for male fertility and some of the ribosomal DNA, the Y chromosome has few coding genes. Although males without Y chromosomes are sterile, they have high viability and appear morphologically indistinguishable from normal males. Several studies have shown that variation in the Y chromosome within D. melanogaster contributes little or nothing to genetic variation in fitness or morphological characteristics.Chippindale and Rice recently reported 1xY chromosome polymorphism is a strong determinant of male fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Chippindale, A.K. and Rice, W.R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001; 98: 5677–5682Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (90)See all References1 a surprising result: substantial variation for fitness associated with the Y chromosome exists within a natural population of D. melanogaster. Indeed, in their study the Y contributes 68% as much variation as an entire X-autosome genomic haplotype. The primary effect of this Y chromosome variation is on male reproductive fitness, not on egg-to-adult viability. Differences in male reproductive fitness could reflect differences in sperm production or function (including sperm competition). Differential mating ability might also contribute to the differences in reproductive success. Segregation distortion is unlikely to be a major component of the observed differences.This study differs from previous ones in that they assayed the fitnesses of different Y chromosome lines in explicitly different genetic backgrounds. The authors’ sophisticated breeding design assured that sublines derived from the same main Y chromosome line would share exceedingly few X-linked or autosomal genes derived from common ancestors. Using these sublines, they then tested the fitnesses of each Y chromosome line in the genetic backgrounds of three different inbred lines. In each genetic background, some Y chromosome lines had much higher fitness than did others. Yet, the lines that did well in one genetic background tended to do poorly in the other genetic backgrounds. Averaged across these backgrounds, there was no significant additive genetic variation for fitness among Y chromosome lines, consistent with the previous studies. The interaction (epistatic) component accounted for the vast majority of the genetic variation.Chippindale and Rice's study has several implications for the evolution of Y chromosomes. For instance, the substantial epistatic genetic variation for fitness should promote the accumulation of new genetic material to the Y chromosome through genetic rearrangements. Their study might also have implications for speciation: between closely related species of Drosophila, divergence in Y chromosomes sometimes contributes to male sterility in hybrids because Y-linked changes in one species interact with autosomal or possibly X-linked changes in the other species. This study demonstrates that the negative interactions that lead to hybrid sterility between species might, to a lesser extent, already be present within species.
Read full abstract