Background: The role of herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation on morbidity/mortality in intensive care unit patients requiring mechanical ventilation remains controversial. Methods: In this multicentre study, non-immunosuppressed adults >18 years old, mechanically ventilated for at least 96 hours and expected to remain on mechanical ventilation for ≥48 hours, with HSV oropharyngeal reactivation, were double-blindly randomized to receive intravenous acyclovir (5 mg/kg tid, for 14 days) or a matching placebo (controls). Randomisation (1:1) was stratified by study site, pre-randomisation mechanical ventilation duration and number of organ failure, and performed using a secure web-based system. The primary endpoint was ventilator-free days from randomisation to day 60. Findings: The 16 participating centres randomised 238 patients: 119 to receive acyclovir and 119 the placebo. On day 60, for acyclovir recipients and controls, respectively, the median (IQR) numbers of ventilator-free days were 35 (0-53) and 36 (0-50) (p=0.17 for between-group comparison); 26 (22%) and 39 (33%) patients had died (risk difference, 0.11, 95% CI, - 0.004 to 0.22, p=0.059). The adverse-event frequency was similar for both groups (28% in the acyclovir group and 23% in the placebo group, p= 0.4), particularly with acute renal failure post-randomisation affecting three acyclovir recipients and two controls. Four patients in the acyclovir group (vs. none in the placebo group) stopped the study drug for treatment-related adverse event. Interpretation: In non-immunosuppressed patients mechanically ventilated for ≥96 hours with HSV reactivation in the throat, intravenous acyclovir use (5 mg/kg tid) did not increase the number of ventilator-free days on day 60, compared to a placebo. Trial Registration: The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02152358. Funding Statement: Direction de la Recherche Clinique et du Developpement and the French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 2011). Declaration of Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. The following conflicts of interest are outside the area of the article. Dr Luyt reports receiving lecture fees from ThermoFischer Brahms, Biomerieux, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Aerogen, and consulting fees from Bayer Healthcare, Carmat and Faron. Dr Jaber reports receiving consulting fees from Drager, Fisher-Paykel, Xenios-Fresenius Medical and Medtronic. Dr Rimmele reports receiving consulting or lecture fees from Fresenius Medical Care, Baxter, Medtronic, Biomerieux, BBraun. Dr Lu reports receiving lectures fees from Aerogen. Dr Combes reports receiving grant support and lectures fees from Maquet and Baxter and consulting fees from Hemovent. Dr Wolff reports receiving consulting fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Inotrem, Correvio, Menarini and Pfizer. Dr Chastre reports receiving lecture and consulting fees from Bayer Healthcare, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Aridis, the Medicines Company, Astra Zenecca, Tigenix, Accelerate Diagnotics, Inotrem and Glaxo Smith Kline Ethics Approval Statement: An independent Ethics Committee (Comite de Protection des Personnes Sud Mediterranee 5) approved its protocol.