1082 Reviews with a conflation of betrayals at the level of the narrative, that of 'individual personal intimacy' and the 'collective failure to preserve the documentation of a manuscript culture' (p. xv). Several areas of investigation are announced, among which are his? tory,nationhood, masculine heroic identity,gender, and social order and interaction. Batt's analysis covers the traditional background of French and English chronicle and romance narratives and their adaptation fora late medieval English audience, fol? lowing the changes taking place during this process, including texts such as Arthour and Merlin, Kyng Alysaunder, and Malory's sources, La Mort le roi Artu and the stanzaic Le Morte Arthur. By comparison with a similar compilation of Arthurian material, that of Micheau Gonot, who in 1470 also produced an Arthuriad, forJacques d'Armagnac, Duke of Nemours, Malory's enterprise leaves more room forthe reader's intervention in the text. His 'emotional' engagement with the narrative is present from Tale 1, where the historical dimension ofthe Arthurian story is apparent, mediated through Merlin, whose non-standard presentation (his name is sometimes abbreviated in the Winchester manuscript, sometimes not) 'reflects an uncertainty about his status in a text that signals but does not investigate [his] distict nature', since his ad? vice is not always taken (p. 53). A large part ofthe analysis focuses on violence against the body, either prompted by desire (Uther's desire for Igrayne gives the tone for all subsequent acts of rape) or by transgression and punishment, as in the case of Balin. In an investigation of the following three tales, Batt narrows the focus on the topos of heroism, examined in the episode of Arthur's war with Lucius and in the narra? tives of Lancelot and Gareth. The story of Tristram is given the function of 'setting limits', both in terms of the elite it addresses and in the descriptions of madness as a way of alienation followed by a recovery of identity. In Malory's version of the Holy Grail quest Batt reads the involvement of the community, while drawing attention to the 'more immediate and inclusive [. . .] political, religious and historical relevance' of his narrative to a fifteenth-centuryaudience, as compared with his French source (p- 137)- In the last chapter Batt turns to the issues of displacement and commemora? tion, emphasizing two ends of the love process, fromthe May passage to the end of the love affairbetween Lancelot and Guenevere. At this stage what seems to be important is Malory's 'engagement with memory, rather than with relic', which brings to the Morte an 'awareness ofthe fifteenth-centuryfashionings of death' (p. 181). Batt's study is persuasive in its effortless,intellectually stimulating interpretation of symbols and themes; commentaries on sources, manuscripts, and material culture are combined with modern views ofthe human body, violence, and narrative techniques. This challenging work addresses a specialized audience, and its discourse extends beyond traditional approaches of Malory's text. A new interpretation of the Morte emerges, one that inscribes the modern response into the fifteenth-centurytext. This short review does little justice to either Kato's or Batt's studies; both remain, how? ever, as two analyses of the Morte which will change our view of Malory's work for some time. University of Wales, Bangor Raluca L. Radulescu WritingtheFuture: La^amon's Prophetic History. By Kelley M. Wickham-Crowley. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. 2002. x+182 pp. ?37.50. ISBN 0-70831714 -6. Merlin: A Casebook. Ed. by Peter H. Goodrich and Raymond H. Thompson. (Arthurian Characters and Themes) New York and London: Routledge. 2003. viii + 443pp. ?75. ISBN 0-8153-0658-x. These two Arthurian studies show more contrasts than parallels. Writing theFuture, based on a Cornell dissertation, is its author's firstbook; Merlin: A Casebook as- MLR, 100.4, 2005 1083 sembles seventeen critical essays (plus introduction) by twentieth-century European and North American scholars. Each book offerssomething, but the second more than the first. Wickham-Crowley's study, with some reason, bypasses historical philology, the main concern of earlier work on La3amon. It fails into three parts, dealing in turn with language as history; the potential of writing and community; and history, prophecy, and possibility...