Herbicide Programs Research Articles

The effects of cereal rye cover crop seeding rate, termination timing, and herbicide inputs on weed control and soybean yield

AbstractGrowers have been experimenting with cover crop termination timings to maximize weed suppression and potentially reduce herbicide inputs in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. A field study was replicated three times from 2018 through 2021 in South Charleston, OH, to evaluate different management strategies involving a cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop. The objectives were to determine the effects of cereal rye seeding rate (0, 50, and 100 kg ha−1), management program (preplant, postplant, and delayed), and soybean residual herbicide (flumioxazin + chlorimuron ethyl and no herbicide) on cover crop, weed, and soybean parameters. The preplant program consisted of cereal rye terminated 7 d before planting (DBP) + a postemergence application. The postplant program consisted of cereal rye terminated 7 d after planting (DAP) + a postemergence application. In the delayed program, saflufenacil was applied in April and cereal rye was terminated 21 DAP, and there was no postemergence application. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.) density was reduced by the presence of cereal rye, averaged over other factors, regardless of seeding rate. Cereal rye seeding rate did not affect giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) density. The delayed management program was generally associated with the lowest weed density, but weed density was often similar in the postplant program. Setaria faberi density was lower in treatments that included a residual herbicide. Residual soybean herbicide use did not affect density of A. trifida. Terminating cereal rye after soybean planting resulted in increased soybean yield in 2019 and reduced yield in 2020, compared with preplant rye termination. These data suggest that adjusting the cereal rye management program may have a greater effect on weed suppression than adjustments to seeding rate. Delaying termination of cereal rye can aid in the suppression of weeds, but a comprehensive herbicide program was necessary to provide adequate (>85%) weed control.

Corn Plant Density Effects on Grain Yield and Palmer Amaranth Response to Dicamba

Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) is primarily found in fallow and cultivated fields throughout Kansas (KS). Previously, we reported that the effective dose of dicamba for 50% control (ED50) of a 10-30 cm tall A. palmeri accession from KS (KSP) during the fallow-year of a wheat-corn-fallow rotation (WCF) ranged between 40.4 to 283.5 g ae ha-1 Here, we investigated corn (Zea mays L.) plant density effects on grain yield and the KSP response to dicamba in the corn-year of the WCF rotation. The experiments used a randomized complete block design with four replicates and a split-plot arrangement of treatments. Main plots consisted of corn planted at five densities (49,400; 61,700; 74,100; 86,400 and 98,800 plants ha-1) and sub-plots consisted of six doses of dicamba [(70, 140, 210, 280, 420, and 560 g ae ha-1) applied near V6], a weedy-check, and a weed-free check. In general, acceptable grain yield and KSP control with dicamba doses < 560 g ae ha-1 were only achieved when corn was planted at a density ≥ 74,100 plants ha-1. Based on the ED50 estimates, the KSP required 4.4-8.2% less dicamba for height and biomass reduction as corn plant density increased from 49,400 to 98,800 plants ha-1. Conversely, the amount of dicamba required for 50% reduction of KSP density increased 45.1% from 144.4 to 209.6 g ae ha-1 as corn plant density increased from 49,400 to 98,800 plants ha-1, respectively. Taken together, this study shows that integration of high-density corn planting with dicamba is a cost-effective tool for controlling A. palmeri. However, resistance mitigation and a season-long control of this species cannot be achieved without the integration of other more diversified and robust strategies that include the use of preemergence fb postemergence herbicide programs that overlap residuals with cultural, biological, and mechanical weed control tactics.

Evaluation of winter cover crop methods for management of flatheaded appletree borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae).

Winter cover crops grown at the base of red maples (Acer rubrum L.) can reduce flatheaded appletree borer (Chrysobothris femorata Olivier; Coleoptera: Buprestidae; FAB) damage by both physically blocking preferred oviposition sites and altering the environment around them. However, cover crop competition negatively affects tree growth. To investigate long-term cover crop effects, trees grown with cover crop for 2 yr were transitioned to a standard herbicide practice. After 4 yr, trees in the initial 2 yr cover crop plots were 1 yr behind in growth compared to trees grown in bare rows for all 4 yr. Most growth reduction occurred in the first year following transplant. Additional borer losses of 1-2% per year were observed in production years 3 and 4. A second experiment answered 2 questions: Can killing the cover crop once it reaches maximal height protect trees from borers while also reducing competition and thereby increase tree growth? and Do herbicide applications increase borer attacks? In this experiment, red maples were grown with (i) a standard herbicide program, (ii) a mulch mat, (iii) a cover crop that was killed early, or (iv) a cover crop allowed to senesce naturally. Evaluations after 2 yr indicated early kill of the cover crop was not enough to improve tree growth. Further, trees in the early kill cover crop treatment had the most FAB attacks. Cover crops allowed to senesce naturally reduced FAB attacks in both studies; however, more work is needed to minimize disparities in tree growth during the initial year post-transplant and determine the causal relationship between herbicide use and borer attacks.

Evaluation of herbicides for selective weed control in cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.)

Cultivation of cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.) is increasing due to its potential nutritional and medicinal use. Lack of registered herbicides is a main constrain for efficient weed control and consequently successful production in cutleaf groundcherry. To evaluate the efficacy of eight herbicide treatments for weed control and crop injury in cutleaf groundcherry, field experiments were conducted in two consequent years (2017 and 2018). Treatments consisted of PRE application of pendimethalin and POST application of foramsulfuron, oxadiazon, nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, sulfosulfuron, iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium + mesosulfuron-methyl-sodium + mefenpyr-diethyl (IMM), and iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium + mesosulfuron-methyl-sodium + diflufenican (IMD). Weed-free and weedy plots were also considered for comparison in both years. Although, density and biomass of broadleaf weeds were decreased in all treatments compared to the weedy check, grass weeds did not affect by the herbicides. In both years, the lowest broadleaf weed dry weight of (12 g m−2) was found in plots treated by IMD and IMM. Different levels of herbicide injury was found in cutleaf groundcherry plants. Of the herbicides tested, the minimum crop injury was related to plots treated with foramsulfuron (1.4%), rimsulfuron (2.7%) and sulfosulfuron (6%). Notice that the yield in rimsulfuron treatment (38,160 kg ha-1 and 18,053 kg ha-1 in 2017 and 2018) was just about 62% and 48% of that in weed free treatment in 2017 and 2018, respectively, although rimsulfuron treatment improved crop fruit yield compared with the weedy treatment. Overall, although none of the tested herbicides could provide fruit yield similar to the weed free condition, an herbicide program consisting of rimsulfuron and sulfosulfuron would therefore provide both high weed control and crop safety.

Herbicide Management of Threespike Goosegrass in California Orchards

Threespike goosegrass (Eleusine tristachya) is a difficult-to-control perennial grass of increasing concern for orchard production systems in the Central Valley of California, USA. This grass has a bunch-type growth habit when tillered, which can interfere with orchard operations, particularly nut pickup from the ground at harvest. From 2016 to 2019, herbicide efficacy on threespike goosegrass was evaluated in a walnut (Juglans regia) orchard in Chico, CA, USA; an almond (Prunus dulcis) orchard in Livingston, CA, USA; and a prune (Prunus domestica) orchard in Orland, CA, USA. At each location, two independent experiments were conducted to evaluate 12 preemergent (PRE) herbicide treatments and eight postemergent (POST) treatments over several years, for a total of 16 trials. PRE herbicides were applied in January according to the region’s typical winter orchard management practices. One treatment included an additional sequential application in March to extend residual activity later into the warm season when threespike goosegrass germinates or resumes growth. In separate studies, POST control of established stands of threespike goosegrass was evaluated in May and June of each year. Each trial was conducted in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Threespike goosegrass control was visually estimated monthly for 5 months after the PRE treatments or at weekly intervals for 5 weeks following POST treatments. The most effective PRE treatment was a sequential application of indaziflam in January, followed by a March application of pendimethalin, providing 90% or greater control of threespike goosegrass 5 months after treatment across all sites and all years. Of the POST treatments, the three graminicides outperformed the other treatments with 73% to 91% control overall sites and years at 5 weeks after treatment. Fluazifop had the highest control ratings (85% to 91%) among the graminicide herbicides but was not always statistically better than clethodim or sethoxydim (74% to 83% control). Glyphosate alone resulted in unacceptable control (33% to 51%) regardless of rates tested, experimental sites, or years. Together, these results confirm grower reports of poor glyphosate performance on threespike goosegrass but suggest that effective herbicide programs can be developed to manage threespike goosegrass using PRE herbicides and POST graminicides registered in California orchard crops.

Different POST-em Herbicide Programs for Weed Management in Lowland Flooded Rice System in North Macedonia

The field experiments were carried out during 2017 and 2018 on commercial rice field in Kochani region to assess different POST-em herbicide programs for weed management in lowland flooded rice system in North Macedonia. In addition, herbicide selectivity and impact on rice grain yield were estimated. POST-em herbicide treatments were used in early-(EPOST-em), mid-(MPOST-em) and late-(LPOST-em) rice growth stages (BBCH 26; 29 and 32-34, respectively). Weed control varied among herbicide treatments, herbicide programs, and weeks after treatments (WAT). All herbicides applied EPOST-em controlled Echinochloa crus-galli (ECHCG) and Scirpus maritumus (SCMA) 91-100%. At MPOST-em treatment, herbicides showed control of ECHCG between 93 and 97%. However, all herbicides applied LPOST-em controlled ECHCG 79-88%. SCMA control was less than 88 and 85% with MPOST-em and LPOST-em treatments, respectively, perhaps as a consequence of progressive growth stage of SCMA (BBCH 40). Control level of Cyperus rotundus (CYPRO) and Heteranthera reniformis (HETRE) was high in all POST-em treatments (between 90-100%, and 95-100%, respectively). EPOST-em and MPOST-em application of any herbicide resulted no phytotoxicity to rice plants. LPOST-em treatments caused rice phytotoxicity by cyhalofop-butyl + penoxsulam, cyhalofop-buthyl + bentazon, and profoxidim + bentazon which were ranged from 8-20%. Unlike rice yield at LPOST-em treatments was 6235 kg ha-1, all EPOST-em and MPOST-em used herbicides has impact in rice yield 6685 and 6610 kg ha-1, respectively which, but there were no statistically significant differences with the weed free control 6710 kg ha-1.

Delayed cover-crop termination and reduced herbicide inputs produce trade-offs in soybean phase of US Northeast forage-grain rotation

AbstractRegion- and system-specific research is needed to understand the viability of delayed cover-crop termination (i.e., planting green) as an integrated weed management (IWM) tactic in no-till soybean. In a 3-yr field experiment, we evaluated the potential for planting green to facilitate elimination of soil-applied, preemergence residual herbicides within a soybean phase of a 6-yr grain–forage cropping systems experiment in Pennsylvania. This IWM tactic was contrasted with a Standard treatment, which included 14 to 21 d pre-plant termination of cereal rye and a two-pass herbicide program with preemergence herbicides. A 63% increase in cereal rye biomass production was observed within the IWM treatment in 2019, but only a 22% and 33% increase in 2020 and 2021, respectively. In 2020, significantly lower volumetric water content (%VWC) was observed within the IWM treatment in dates closest to planting and greater %VWC at multiple dates in June and July compared to the Standard treatment. No differences occurred in soybean populations, but soybean biomass at the V4 growth stage was reduced in the Standard treatment compared to the IWM treatment, which we attribute to injury from preemergence applications. The Standard treatment resulted in greater soybean yield (2,590 kg ha–1) than the IWM treatment (1,870 kg ha–1) in 2020, but yields were similar in other years. The IWM treatment resulted in 58% fewer herbicide inputs, as measured by the number of active ingredients applied, compared to the Standard over the 3-yr study. Yet, peak weed biomass did not differ between treatments. However, the IWM treatment resulted in greater total horseweed density and the number of horseweed plants that exceeded recommended size-based height thresholds (10 cm) compared to the Standard treatment just prior to postemergence applications (35–42 d after planting) in 2020 and 2021, underscoring the importance of integrating surface mulch residues with effective herbicide sites of action.

Multi-tactic strategies to manage herbicide-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) in corn–soybean rotations of the U.S. Midwest

AbstractField experiments were conducted over 2 yr (2019 to 2020) at two locations in Iowa to evaluate multi-tactic strategies for managing multiple herbicide–resistant (MHR) waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer] in a corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation. The effect of three herbicide programs on A. tuberculatus control was tested in corn (2019). The effects of the prior year’s corn weed control, a cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop, and soybean row spacing (38-cm vs. 76-cm wide) on A. tuberculatus density, biomass, and seed production were tested in soybean (2020). A herbicide program used in corn with two sites of action provided only 35% control of MHR A. tuberculatus compared with ≥97% control by a herbicide program with three sites of action. In soybean, adequate control of A. tuberculatus (≥90%) in the prior year’s corn crop and use of a cover crop or narrow rows reduced A. tuberculatus density by more than 60% at 3 and 9 wk after planting (WAP) compared with inadequate control (30%) in the prior year’s corn and no cover crop. Cover crop and narrow-row soybean reduced A. tuberculatus density by 44% at 3 WAP compared with no cover crop and wide-row soybean. Inclusion of a single control tactic, adequate control (≥90%) with multiple herbicides in the prior year’s corn, use of a cover crop, or narrow-row soybean reduced A. tuberculatus biomass and seed production at soybean harvest by at least 24% compared with inadequate control (30%) in the prior year’s corn, no cover crop, and wide-row soybean. The combination of all three control tactics reduced A. tuberculatus biomass and seed production at soybean harvest by at least 80%. In conclusion, diverse control tactics targeting A. tuberculatus at multiple life-cycle stages can make substantial contributions to the management of MHR populations.

Layered‐residual herbicide programs for waterhemp control in glufosinate‐resistant soybean

Core Ideas Glufosinate is an important POST herbicide for waterhemp control in glufosinate‐resistant soybean. The layered‐residual herbicide approach improved season‐long waterhemp control. Glufosinate POST combined with layered soil residual herbicides improved season‐long waterhemp control. Glufosinate is an important POST herbicide for waterhemp control in glufosinate‐resistant soybean. The layered‐residual herbicide approach improved season‐long waterhemp control. Glufosinate POST combined with layered soil residual herbicides improved season‐long waterhemp control.

Multiple-herbicide-resistant waterhemp control in glyphosate/glufosinate/2,4-D-resistant soybean with one- and two-pass weed control programs

AbstractWaterhemp control in Ontario has increased in complexity due to the evolution of biotypes that are resistant to five herbicide modes of action (Groups 2, 5, 9, 14, and 27 as categorized by the Weed Science Society of America). Four field trials were carried out over a 2-yr period in 2021 and 2022 to assess the control of multiple-herbicide-resistant (MHR) waterhemp biotypes in glyphosate/glufosinate/2,4-D-resistant (GG2R) soybean using one- and two-pass herbicide programs. S-metolachlor/metribuzin, pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone, pyroxasulfone/flumioxazin, and pyroxasulfone + metribuzin applied preemergence (PRE) controlled MHR waterhemp similarly by 46%, 63%, 60%, and 69%, respectively, at 8 wk after postemergence (POST) application (WAA-B). A one-pass application of 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA POST provided greater control of MHR waterhemp than glufosinate. Two-pass herbicide programs of a PRE herbicide followed by (fb) a POST-applied herbicide resulted in greater MHR waterhemp control compared to a single PRE or POST herbicide application. PRE herbicides fb glufosinate or 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA POST controlled MHR waterhemp by 74% to 91% and by 84% to 96%, respectively, at 8 WAA-B. Two-pass herbicide applications of an effective PRE residual herbicide fb 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA POST in GG2R soybean can effectively manage waterhemp that is resistant to herbicides in Groups 2, 5, 9, 14, and 27.

Glyphosate-resistant horseweed control in glyphosate/glufosinate/2,4-D-resistant soybean with one- and two-pass herbicide programs

AbstractGlyphosate-resistant (GR) biotypes of horseweed were first confirmed in southern Ontario in 2010 and have spread across southern Ontario. A total of four field experiments were conducted between 2021 and 2022 to determine GR horseweed control with one- and two-pass herbicide programs in glyphosate/glufosinate/2,4-D-resistant (GG2R) soybean. 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA, halauxifen-methyl, and saflufenacil applied preplant (PP) controlled GR horseweed by 59%, 72%, and 78% 8 wk after postemergence (POST) application (WAA-POST); there was no improvement of GR horseweed control when 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA was added to saflufenacil; in contrast, there was improved GR horseweed control when saflufenacil was added to 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA. Glufosinate and 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA applied POST controlled glyphosate-resistant horseweed by 71% and 86%, respectively, 8 WAA-POST. Two-pass herbicide programs of a PP followed by POST application provided greater GR horseweed control than a PP or POST herbicide applied alone. Glufosinate or 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA applied POST following 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA or halauxifen-methyl applied PP improved GR horseweed control by 29% to 38% and 24%, respectively at 8 WAA-POST. The application of 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA applied POST following saflufenacil applied PP improved control by 20% 8 WAA-POST; there was no improvement of GR horseweed control when glufosinate was applied POST following saflufenacil applied PP or when either POST herbicide was applied following saflufenacil + 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA applied PP. When used in a two-pass program, 2,4-D choline/glyphosate DMA POST provided 2% to 3% greater control of GR horseweed than glufosinate.

Solanum carolinense L.

<i>Solanum carolinense</i> L.

Impact of integrated weed management practices on cotton economics and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations

AbstractThe threat of herbicide-resistant weed species, such as Palmer amaranth, has driven the development of robust weed management programs that rely on more than chemicals for weed control. Previous research has shown that zero-tolerance weed thresholds, cover crops, deep tillage, and diverse herbicide programs are effective strategies for controlling Palmer amaranth. Unfortunately, research investigating the integration of all four of these weed management strategies in a system is lacking. To better leverage these integrated weed management strategies in cotton production systems, a long-term study was initiated in fall 2018 near Marianna, AR, with zero tolerance, deep tillage, a cereal rye cover crop, and either a dicamba or non-dicamba in-crop herbicide program as factors. Results found that total Palmer amaranth emergence was reduced 76% as the result of deep tillage in 2019 and, in the absence of a zero-tolerance strategy, 73% in 2020. In the absence of a zero-tolerance strategy, the combination of a non–cover crop strategy and dicamba herbicide program decreased total Palmer amaranth emergence by 73%, while the combination of a cover crop strategy and dicamba herbicide program decreased total Palmer amaranth emergence by 78% compared to the combination of a cover crop and non-dicamba herbicide program. Under a zero-tolerance strategy in 2019, tillage reduced cotton yield by 12% and partial returns by US$370 ha−1. In 2020, tillage reduced cotton yield by 14% and partial returns of US$371 ha−1 under a non-zero-tolerance strategy, while a 12% yield reduction and a US$260 ha−1 decrease in partial returns were observed under a zero-tolerance strategy. In 2019, the non-dicamba program resulted in greater partial returns than the dicamba in-crop program because of greater yield and lower program costs. However, in 2020, partial returns were greater for the dicamba in-crop herbicide program owing to greater yields achieved by this program.

Effect of cotton herbicide programs on weed population trajectories and frequency of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)

AbstractThe adoption of dicamba-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars allows using dicamba to reduce weed populations across growing seasons. However, the overuse of this tool risks selecting new herbicide-resistant biotypes. The objectives of this research were to determine the population trajectories of several weed species and track the frequency of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) over 8 yr in dicamba-resistant cotton. An experiment was established in North Carolina in 2011, and during the first 4 yr, different herbicide programs were applied. These programs included postemergence applications of glyphosate, alone or with dicamba, with or without residual herbicides. During the last 4 yr, all programs received glyphosate plus dicamba. Biennial rotations of postemergence applications of glyphosate only and glyphosate plus dicamba postemergence with and without preemergence herbicides were also included. Sequential applications of glyphosate plus dicamba were applied to the entire test area for the final 4 yr of the study. No herbicide program was entirely successful in controlling the weed community. Weed population trajectories were different according to species and herbicide program, creating all possible outcomes; some increased, others decreased, and others remained stable. Density of resistant A. palmeri increased during the first 4 yr with glyphosate-only programs (up to 11,739 plants m−2) and decreased a 96% during the final 4 yr, when glyphosate plus dicamba was implemented. This species had a strong influence on population levels of other weed species in the community. Goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.] was not affected by A. palmeri population levels and even increased its density in some herbicide programs, indicating that not only herbicide resistance but also reproductive rates and competitive dynamics are critical for determining weed population trajectories under intensive herbicide-based control programs. Frequency of glyphosate resistance reached a maximum of 62% after 4 yr, and those levels were maintained until the end of the experiment.

Benzobicyclon for weedy rice control in quizalofop- and imidazolinone-resistant rice systems

AbstractGowan Company recently registered benzobicyclon, a WSSA Group 27 herbicide, as a postflood option in rice. It is the first 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-inhibiting herbicide commercially available in mid-southern U.S. rice production. In 2018 and 2019, field experiments were conducted across multiple sites in Arkansas to determine if the addition of benzobicyclon to quizalofop- or imidazolinone-resistant rice herbicide programs would improve weedy rice control. Across site-years, one application of quizalofop, either at the 1- or 3-leaf rice stage, followed by benzobicyclon applied postflood, provided comparable weedy rice control to two sequential applications of quizalofop, which is a standard herbicide program in quizalofop-resistant rice. Additionally, treatments containing quizalofop or quizalofop followed by benzobicyclon injured rice ≤5% at 28 d after the postflood application. Across site-years, at 28 d after the postflood application of benzobicyclon, all treatments containing a full-season herbicide program followed by benzobicyclon postflood provided comparable or improved weedy rice control when compared to two sequential early postemergence applications of imazethapyr. In both experiments, rice treated with benzobicyclon yielded comparably or better than treatments containing the standard herbicide program for each system. Findings from this research suggest that the use of benzobicyclon in quizalofop- and imidazolinone-resistant rice systems could be an additional and viable weedy rice control option for rice producers.

Economics of reducing Palmer amaranth seed production in dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate‐resistant soybean

AbstractIncreased prevalence of glyphosate‐resistant (GR) weeds within agronomic cropping systems has led to the readoption of pre‐emergence (PRE) herbicides and use of multiple herbicide‐resistant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars. Herbicide programs were evaluated in the recently commercialized dicamba/glyphosate/glufosinate‐resistant (DGGR) soybean for weed control, reduction of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) seed production, crop safety, and economic performance. At 35 days after pre‐emergence herbicides, acetochlor plus dicamba plus metribuzin, acetochlor/fomesafen plus dicamba, dicamba plus flumioxazin, and imazethapyr/pyroxasulfone/saflufenacil provided 80–99% control of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.), Palmer amaranth, common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), and Poaceae species. Evaluation at 14 days after early postemergence herbicides indicated PRE followed by (fb) POST applications of mixtures of acetochlor, dicamba, glufosinate, and glyphosate provided 80–99% weed control compared with 67–93% control in POST‐only programs. Most herbicide programs provided 83–99% control of grass and broadleaf weeds, with 85–91% weed biomass reductions at 28 days after late‐POST. The PRE fb POST programs reduced Palmer amaranth seed production by 94–99%, whereas POST‐only programs provided 75–83% reduction. In 2020, most programs provided gross profit margins ≥US$1,000 ha−1, with glufosinate fb glufosinate and imazethapyr/pyroxasulfone/saflufenacil fb acetochlor plus glufosinate providing $1,481 and $1,466 ha−1, respectively. Benefit/cost ratios ranged between 0.3 and 3.9 in 2019 due to hail but increased to 2.9–10.9 in 2020. Results of this study support use of PRE herbicides with multiple sites of action in DGGR soybean and indicate that glufosinate can provide POST control of GR Palmer amaranth.

Population dynamics of naturally occurring weed flora in response to crop rotation and HPPD-inhibiting herbicide-based treatments

AbstractA 3-yr field study was conducted in Keiser, AR, to investigate the response of the naturally occurring weed flora, dominated by Palmer amaranth, under various combinations of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicide-based programs and crop rotation sequences. In the first year, corn plots were established with three corn HPPD-based herbicide programs designed to represent a range of efficacies and selection pressures for resistance. In the following two years, corn as monoculture or with soybean and/or cotton crops was included in the rotation sequence for selected herbicide programs. Weed emergence, weed biomass, and soil seedbank were assessed through the entire experimental period. The results show that crop rotation, especially a rotation sequence with corn followed by (fb) soybean fb cotton, and the lowest-risk herbicide program involving seven sites of action over the course of the entire crop rotation was effective in reducing the emergence of naturally occurring weeds, including Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, morningglory species, and grass weeds (broadleaf signalgrass, large crabgrass, barnyardgrass, and johnsongrass) by 88.3%, 57.5%, 28.7%, and 76.3%, respectively. Treatments without crop rotation (corn as monoculture for 3 consecutive years) and poor herbicide programs, with one site of action, increased weed emergence, notably of Palmer amaranth and prickly sida, by 73.5% and 74.1%, respectively. The soil seedbank showed a similar trend to weed emergence. This study highlights the fact that reducing the weed seedbank cannot rely on one management practice but requires a multitactic approach with various control methods. HPPD-inhibiting herbicide programs seem to be effective on Palmer amaranth when coupled with crop rotation and should be used with other best management practices.

Modeling weed community diversity based on species population density dynamics and herbicide use intensity

Herbicide programs change weed population density as well as weed community composition. The repeated use of a given program can result in a weed community that progressively becomes more difficult to manage or could lose its ability to provide ecosystem services. Simulation of those changes using stochastic models considering population dynamics of multiple species makes it possible to identify a priori potential community changes that might result from the use of a given herbicide program. The objectives of this work were to model the population dynamics of weed species under different herbicide programs and how those dynamics change weed community diversity over time. Weed population dynamics were stochastically modeled along ten years using population growth rate (lambda) for each species under different herbicide programs. Lambda values were obtained from an eight-year long, field experiment, and these were used to parameterize the stochastic ranges for the model for each weed species. Population trajectories were modeled for each individual species over ten years and the results were used to estimate richness, diversity, and evenness for each herbicide use scenario. The repeated use of glyphosate alone had a minimal effect on richness, but it caused a strong reduction in weed diversity and evenness. Programs with more mechanisms of action and the use of both preemergence and postemergence herbicides were slightly more likely to suffer the loss of weed species than programs with single or just a few herbicides. Conversely, the former had a higher probability of maintaining weed diversity and evenness than the latter. According to simulations, losses in weed community diversity are reversible, especially when highly competitive species were eradicated allowing other species with lower lambda to increase their populations. However, the eradication of species with low reproductive rates reduced diversity and evenness. The effects of herbicide programs on the weed community lasted for several years even after those programs were modified indicating that seed banks play a major buffering role in the rate of change of weed community composition. Thus, frequent changes in management interrupting the repeated use of specific weed control programs, even under high herbicide intensity use (i.e., number of applications and mechanisms of action), can help maintain weed diversity in agroecosystems.

Impact of Irrigation Levels and Weed Control Treatments on Annual Weeds, Physiological Traits and Productivity of Soybean under Clay Soil Conditions

Water scarcity and weed infestation are major challenges to soybean production. Therefore, two field experiments were conducted in a strip plot design including three replicates in the 2019 and 2020 summer seasons at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt, to investigate the effect of three irrigation levels (I0 (100%), I1 (90%), and I2 (80%)), and six weed control treatments of pendimethalin (T1), oxyfluorfen (T2), bentazon + clethodim (T3), imazethapyr (T4), hand-hoeing twice (T5), and untreated check (T6) on annual weeds, physiological traits, water relations, and yield and its components of soybean cv Giza 111. Results indicated that intermediate irrigation levels lead to the highest yield and economic return, while the herbicide program that resulted in the greatest weed control gave the highest yield. The rate of weed infestation in field experiments was 19.7 and 21.8 t ha−1 dry weights, which decreased soybean yield by 56.9 and 57.1%, compared to treatment (T4). The interactions between 100 irrigation level (I0) and imazethapyr (T4), bentazon + clethodim (T3), and hand-hoeing twice (T5) gave the highest significant values of the most studied characters. Furthermore, under 90% irrigation, all weed control treatments give the best control of weeds and the highest values of the economic criteria.

Seedbank management through an integration of harvest-time and postharvest tactics for Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) in wheat

AbstractItalian ryegrass is a major weed in winter cereals in the south-central United States. Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) tactics that aim to remove weed seed from crop fields are a potential avenue to reduce Italian ryegrass seedbank inputs. To this effect, a 4-yr, large-plot field study was conducted in College Station, Texas, and Newport, Arkansas, from 2016 to 2019. The treatments were arranged in a split-plot design. The main-plot treatments were (1) no narrow-windrow burning (a HWSC strategy) + disk tillage immediately after harvest, (2) HWSC + disk tillage immediately after harvest, and (3) HWSC + disk tillage 1 mo after harvest. The subplot treatments were (1) pendimethalin (1,065 g ai ha−1; Prowl H2O®) as a delayed preemergence application (herbicide program #1), and (2) a premix of flufenacet (305 g ai ha−1) + metribuzin (76 g ai ha−1; Axiom®) mixed with pyroxasulfone (89 g ai ha−1; Zidua® WG) as an early postemergence application followed by pinoxaden (59 g ai ha−1; Axial® XL) in spring (herbicide program #2). After 4 yr, HWSC alone was significantly better than no HWSC. Herbicide program #2 was superior to herbicide program #1. Herbicide program #2 combined with HWSC was the most effective treatment. The combination of herbicide program #1 and standard harvest practice (no HWSC; check) led to an increase in fall Italian ryegrass densities from 4 plants m−2 in 2017 to 58 plants m−2 in 2019 at College Station. At wheat harvest, Italian ryegrass densities were 58 and 59 shoots m−2 in check plots at College Station and Newport, respectively, whereas the densities were near zero in plots with herbicide program #2 and HWSC at both locations. These results will be useful for developing an improved Italian ryegrass management strategy in this region.