HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Research Articles

Elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in a multicentre cohort

IntroductionCyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy have become the gold standard in hormone receptor-positive (HR +) HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is a significant lack of data regarding the efficacy and safety of these treatments in elderly patients. We present the results of a real-world data (RWD) cohort stratified by age at treatment initiation (≥ 70 years compared to patients < 70 years).MethodsClinico-pathological data of HR + HER2- MBC patients who were candidates for CDK4/6i therapy between January 2017 and December 2020 at the Institut Català d'Oncologia (Spain) were retrospectively collected. The primary goal was to assess Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and safety outcomes within this patient population.ResultsA total of 274 patients with MBC who received CDK4/6i treatment were included in the study. Among them, 84 patients (30.8%) were aged ≥ 70 years, with a mean age of 75, while 190 patients (69.2%) were under the age of 70, with a mean age of 55.7 years. The most frequently observed grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia, with similar rates in both the < 70 group (43.9%) and the ≥ 70 group (47.9%) (p = 0.728). The median Progression-Free Survival (mPFS) for the first-line CDK4/6i treatment was 22 months (95% CI, 15.4–39.8) in the < 70 group and 20.8 months (95% CI 11.2–NR) in the ≥ 70 group (p = 0.67). Similarly, the median PFS for the second-line CDK4/6i treatment was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.4–15.1) and 7.1 months (95% CI 4.4–21.3) (p = 0.79), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached either for the first- and second-line treatment.ConclusionsOur RWD suggests that elderly patients, when compared to those under 70, experience similar survival outcomes and exhibit comparable tolerance for CDK4/6i therapy.

Abstract 4693: A Phase 1b study of BYL719 (Alpelisib) in combination with androgen receptor inhibitor (enzalutamide) in patients with androgen receptor (AR)-positive and PTEN-positive metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: Novel combination therapies treatment of Hormone Receptor (HR)+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, with a high incidence of AR expression, remains to be a priority in modern-day clinical trials. The PI3K pathway, a crucial regulator of cell processes, has been closely linked to AR signaling, with the interplays between the AR and PI3K pathways leading to emerging interest in exploring combination that target both pathways. Several studies have hinted at concordance between AR expression and PI3K pathway aberrations in breast cancer. therapies. Methods: We conducted a phase 1b clinical trial of BYL719 in combination with enzalutamide for patients with AR-positive (defined as ≥ 1% of nuclear staining) , PTEN-positive (defined as &amp;gt;0% of nuclear staining), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The primary objective was to determine the recommended dose of the 2 drugs for a phase II study (RP2D), in addition to the toxicity/safety profile of the combination. A conventional 3+3 dose escalation design was applied. Results: A total of 18 patients were enrolled, with 17 ultimately treated (12 in dose-finding and 5 in dose-expansion). The median age was 57 (28-77 y/o). Two of the 17 were classified as having metastatic TNBC, and the remainder ER and/or PR+ MBC. Patients received a median of 2 prior endocrine therapies (range 0-5) and a median of 2 prior chemotherapies (range 0-4). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) established a dose of BYL719 of 200 mg in combination with enzalutamide 160 mg. 4 patients experienced DLTs at the higher dose of BYL719 of 250 mg PO daily (4 with a maculopapular rash ranging from grade 1-3, 1 additionally with allergic reaction and lung infection categorized as grade 3). Three patients experienced SAEs, 2 at a higher dose of BYL 719 (fever, maculopapular rash, infection, allergic reaction) and 1 at the 200 mg dose, thought to be unrelated. The most common AEs attributed to enzalutamide included anemia (6 total, 3 grade 3, 3 grade 2), headache (6 total, 4 grade 1, 2 grade 2), and nausea (6 total, 3 grade 1, 3 grade 2). The most common AEs attributed to alpelisib included diarrhea (8 total, 5 grade 1, 2 grade 2, 1 grade 3), hyperglycemia (14 total, 7 grade 1, 4 grade 2, 3 grade 3) and rash (7 total, 1 grade 2, 6 grade 3). Clinical benefit rate was observed at 16 weeks, 6.7% partial response, 26.7% stable disease, and 60% progressive disease. Overall survival in the total cohort was 19.4 month (95% CI 4.11-NA), with a median time to progression of 2.07 months (95% CI 1.81-NA). Conclusions: The Phase 1b study of BYL719 in combination with enzalutamide provides valuable insights into the safety and tolerability of the combination in AR/PTEN-positive MBC, including RP2D. Further studies are needed to evaluate their treatment efficacy fully. Citation Format: Meghan Karuturi, Takeo Fuji, Naoto Ueno. A Phase 1b study of BYL719 (Alpelisib) in combination with androgen receptor inhibitor (enzalutamide) in patients with androgen receptor (AR)-positive and PTEN-positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4693.

Abstract 4622: Anti-tumor activity of CDK2 inhibitor BLU-222 in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors for overcoming resistance in HR positive and triple negative metastatic breast cancers models

Abstract Background: Cyclin-dependent-kinase-4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) plus endocrine therapy (ET) are standard of care first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the emergence of resistance to CDK4/6is plus ET presents a clinical challenge with few treatment alternatives. The effectiveness of CDK4/6is in patients with triple-negative (TN) breast cancer remains uncertain, although the potential synergy with other targeted therapies is currently under investigation. Our study demonstrates the enhanced and synergistic activity of BLU-222, a selective CDK2 inhibitor, when combined with CDK4/6is in preclinical models of both HR+/HER2- and TN breast cancer resistant to CDK4/6is. Methods: Palbociclib resistant (PR) HR+/HER2- (MCF7 and T47D) and TN (MDA-MB-231 and BT-20) breast cancer cell lines were generated by escalating palbociclib concentrations in culture. Using SynergyFinder, we assessed the effect of BLU-222 alone and in combination with palbociclib in the highest single-agent model in vitro. The effectiveness of BLU-222, alone or in combination with palbociclib, was further evaluated in four patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models from HR+/HER2- patients whose tumors progressed after palbociclib plus ET, two TN PDX models, and a TN breast cancer transgenic model driven by tumor-specific forms of cyclin E. Results: The PR HR+/HER2- and TN breast cancer cell lines, unresponsive to palbociclib, exhibited significantly increased sensitivity to BLU-222. The combination of BLU-222 and palbociclib in all four cell lines revealed a robust synergistic effect in PR cells, inducing enhanced apoptosis and cell cycle alterations in G1 or G2/M phases. Treatment with BLU-222 and palbociclib demonstrated substantial antitumor activity in all six PDX models and the cyclin E high TN transgenic models, surpassing the effects of individual treatments in each model. This combination led to lasting tumor regression and extended survival, even after treatment discontinuation. Mechanistically, treatment with BLU-222, alone or combined with palbociclib, induced the expression of p21 and/or p27 in all in vivo models, which we hypothesize sensitizes tumors to palbociclib. In vitro, the CRISPR knockout of p21 or p27 in MCF-7 PR cells abolished the synergistic activity of BLU-222 and palbociclib, confirming the crucial involvement of p21 and p27 in influencing the treatment's effectiveness. Conclusions: We found robust activity of the CDK2 inhibitor, BLU-222 when combined with CDK4/6is in resistant HR+/HER2- and TN breast cancer cell lines and in vivo models. These results support the potential clinical utility of BLU-222 in combination with CDK4/6is for the treatment of both subtypes of breast cancer. Citation Format: Linjie Luo, Yan Wang, Tuyen Bui, Mi Li, Serena Kim, Juliana Navarro-Yepes, Nicole M. Kettner, Debasish Tripathy, Kelly K. Hunt, Kerrie Faia, Khandan Keyomarsi. Anti-tumor activity of CDK2 inhibitor BLU-222 in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors for overcoming resistance in HR positive and triple negative metastatic breast cancers models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4622.

Abstract 7630: Therapeutic relevance of systemic immune status to treatment effects of abemaciclib

Abstract Background: The addition of a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) on endocrine therapies (ET) has been currently a standard treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Especially abemaciclib has been implicated in multiple mechanisms of action including cell cycle arrest, senescence. In addition, immunomodulatory effects have been suggested but are not yet clear. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical relevance of abemaciclib to systemic immune status by examining the status of peripheral immune cells in patients with MBC who received abemaciclib plus ET. Methods: Patients with MBC who were treated with abemaciclib plus ET in our hospital were included in this study. Response was evaluated by RECIST 1.1. Peripheral blood at the initiation of abemaciclib treatment, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24weeks after abemaciclib treatment initiation were analyzed using mass cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF). Changes of cellular densities of each immune cell and survival by immune cell density were analyzed without calculating p values because of small sample number. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled, among whom 14 and 6 received an aromatase inhibitor and fulvestrant, respectively, as concomitant ET. 7 premenopausal patients received an LH-RH analogue. The analysis of serial blood collection showed an increase in CD8-positive T cell density by 12.5% and conversely a decrease in monocyte density by 52.3% at 4 weeks after treatment initiation. In responders (N = 10), an increase of the ratio between CD8-positive T cell density and Treg density (CD8/Treg) at 4 weeks after the treatment initiation were observed (65.2%), while not in non-responders (7.3%). In the analysis of the blood samples at the treatment initiation, lower Treg density and lower NK density at treatment initiation indicated longer PFS than the counterparts (median PFS for Treg: low, not reached; high, 8.8 months; for NK: low, not reached; high, 8.8 months). Conclusion: An increase of CD8/Treg at 4 weeks after the treatment initiation was associated with a good response in patients with HR-positive HER2-negative MBC treated with abemaciclib plus ET. Our results suggest an association between systemic immune status and clinical outcome in MBC patients who received abemaciclib plus ET treatment. A larger study is needed to validate the results. Citation Format: Takayuki Ueno, Shigehisa Kitano, Takayuki Kobayashi, Makiko Yamashita, Fumikata Hara, Yukinori Ozaki, Meiko Nishimura, Toshimi Takano, Naoko Toriguchi, Tsutomu Kawaguchi. Therapeutic relevance of systemic immune status to treatment effects of abemaciclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7630.

A Representative Clinical Course of Progression, with Molecular Insights, of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Despite treatment advances, breast cancer remains a leading cause of death of women in the United States, mostly due to metastatic disease. Bone is a preferential site for breast cancer metastasis, and most metastatic breast cancer patients experience bone involvement at the time of death. The majority of patients with bone metastatic breast cancer are first diagnosed with and treated for early-stage disease, and from development of early-stage breast cancer to the recurrence of cancer in the bones, up to 30 years may elapse. Throughout this timeframe, a typical patient undergoes many treatments that have effects on the bone microenvironment. Therefore, this review explores the clinical course of a representative patient with hormone receptor-positive bone metastatic breast cancer, examining key treatment options at each stage and their effects on preventing and treating bone metastases.

Efficacy of first-line CDK 4-6 inhibitors in premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to treatment-related neutropenia on efficacy: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study

The only phase 3 study on the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in first-line treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer is the MONALEESA-7 study, and data on the effectiveness of palbociclib is limited. Data are also limited regarding the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia, the most common side effect of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib and ribociclib in first-line treatment in patients with premenopausal metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to neutropenia on progression-free survival. Our study is a multicenter, retrospective study, and factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) were examined in patients diagnosed with metastatic premenopausal breast cancer from 29 different centers and receiving combination therapy containing palbociclib or ribociclib in the metastatic stage. 319 patients were included in the study. The mPFS for patients treated with palbociclib was 26.83 months, and for those receiving ribociclib, the mPFS was 29.86 months (p = 0.924). mPFS was 32.00 months in patients who received a reduced dose, and mPFS was 25.96 months in patients who could take the initial dose, and there was no statistical difference (p = 0.238). Liver metastasis, using a fulvestrant together with a CDK 4-6 inhibitor, ECOG PS 1 was found to be a negative prognostic factor. No new adverse events were observed. In our study, we found PFS over 27 months in patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer with CDK 4-6 inhibitors used in first-line treatment, similar to post-menopausal patients. We did not detect any difference between the effectiveness of the two CDK 4-6 inhibitors, and we showed that there was no decrease in the effectiveness of the CDK 4-6 inhibitor in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia.

Neuropilin-1 and placental growth factor as prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundAngiogenesis is crucial for tumor development, progression, and metastasizing. The most important regulator of angiogenesis is the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, which is involved in multiple pathways in tumor microenvironment. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the VEGF family in patients treated for metastatic breast cancer. The emphasis was on neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF).Materials and methodsAn analysis of eight members of the VEGF family was performed using baseline plasma samples of 65 patients treated for metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer in a phase II first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy trial. The patients were divided into two groups, high or low, according to the median for each VEGF family member. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined for each VEGF family member.ResultsThe patients with low plasma levels of NRP-1 and PlGF had a longer OS than those with high plasma levels [multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) 2.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–5.82, p = 0.02) and 3.11 (95% CI 1.30–7.47, p = 0.01), respectively]. The patients with low levels of both NRP-1 and PlGF had a remarkably long OS with HR of 6.24, (95% CI 1.97–19.76, p = 0.002). In addition, high baseline NRP-1 level was associated with a significantly shorter PFS [multivariable adjusted HR 2.90 (95% CI 1.02–8.28, p = 0.04)] than that in the low-level group, and a high baseline vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 level was associated with a longer PFS [multivariable adjusted HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.19–0.98, p = 0.04)].ConclusionEspecially NRP-1 and PlGF have prognostic potential in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with a bevacizumab-taxane combination. Patients with low plasma levels of NRP-1 or PlGF have longer OS than patients with high levels. Patients with both low NRP-1 and PlGF levels appear to have excellent long-term survival.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00979641, registration date 18/09/2009. The regional Ethics Committee: R08142M, registration date 18/11/2008.

Early prediction of endocrine responsiveness in ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): pilot study with 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) CT/PET

18F-fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is considered an accurate diagnostic tool to determine whole-body endocrine responsiveness. In the endocrine therapy (ET)-FES trial, we evaluated 18F-FES PET/CT as a predictive tool in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eligible patients underwent an 18F-FES PET/CT at baseline. Patients with standardized uptake value (SUV) ≥ 2 received single-agent ET until progressive disease; patients with SUV < 2 were randomized to single-agent ET (arm A) or chemotherapy (ChT) (arm B). The primary objective was to compare the activity of first-line ET versus ChT in patients with 18F-FES SUV <2. Overall, 147 patients were enrolled; 117 presented with 18F-FES SUV ≥ 2 and received ET; 30 patients with SUV < 2 were randomized to ET or ChT. After a median follow-up of 62.4 months, 104 patients (73.2%) had disease progression and 53 died (37.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-59.6 months] in patients with SUV < 2 randomized to arm A versus 23.0 months (95% CI 7.7-30.0 months) in arm B, [hazard (HR)= 0.71, 95% CI 0.3-1.7 months]; median PFS was 18.0 months (95% CI 11.2-23.1 months) in patients with SUV ≥ 2 treated with ET. Median overall survival (OS) was 28.2 months (95% CI 14.2 months-not estimable) in patients with SUV < 2 randomized to ET (arm A) versus 52.8 months (95% CI 16.2 months-not estimable) in arm B (ChT). Median OS was not reached in patients with SUV ≥ 2. 60-month OS rate was 41.6% (95% CI 10.4% to 71.1%) in arm A, 42.0% (95% CI 14.0% to 68.2%) in arm B, and 59.6% (95% CI 48.6% to 69.0%) in patients with SUV ≥ 2. In patients with SUV ≥ 2, 60-month OS rate was 72.6% if treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus 40.6% in case of fulvestrant or tamoxifen (P < 0.005). The ET-FES trial demonstrated that ER+/HER2- MBC patients are a heterogeneous population, with different levels of endocrine responsiveness based on 18F-FES CT/PET SUV.

A phase 1b study of zilovertamab in combination with paclitaxel for locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer

BackgroundZilovertamab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting ROR1, an onco-embryonic antigen expressed by malignant cells of a variety of solid tumors, including breast cancer. A prior phase 1 study showed that zilovertamab was well tolerated and effective in inhibiting ROR1-signaling, which leads to activation of ERK1/2, NF-κB, and NRF2 target genes. This phase 1b study evaluated the safety and tolerability of zilovertamab with paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer.Patients and methodsEligible patients had locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic HER2− breast cancer with Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 0–2 and without prior taxane therapy in the advanced setting. Study treatment included 600 mg of zilovertamab administered intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 and then Day 1 of each 28-day cycle along with paclitaxel weekly at 80 mg/m2 IV.ResultsStudy patients had received a median of 4 prior therapies (endocrine therapy + chemotherapy) for locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic disease. No patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity ascribed to zilovertamab. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of paclitaxel. Of 16 patients, 6 (38%) had a partial response, and 6/16 (38%) patients had stable disease as best tumor response.ConclusionThe combination of zilovertamab and paclitaxel was safe and well tolerated in heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer patients. Further evaluation of ROR1 targeting in breast cancer patients with zilovertamab is warranted.Trial Registration: NCT02776917. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 05/17/2016.

A Pilot Study of the Combination of Entinostat with Capecitabine in Advanced Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer has an unacceptably high recurrence rate when any residual disease is found following neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk disease. Based on clinical data suggesting an adjuvant role for epigenetic modifying agents in breast cancer and preclinical data suggesting synergistic activity of entinostat combined with capecitabine, we conducted a phase I, open-label study of these agents in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Both agents have published doses for use in combination therapy, but the agents had not previously been combined with each other in a human trial. A multisite phase I dose escalation study was performed at two academic centers. Patients with pretreated, HER2-negative MBC, and measurable disease were enrolled. Dual dose escalation was performed via a Bayesian partial order continual assessment method. Dose levels ranged from entinostat 3 mg to 5 mg and capecitabine 800 mg/m2 to 1000 mg/m2. Thirteen patients with MBC and a median of 4 lines of prior therapy were enrolled across four dose level combinations. The most common toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and palmar-plantar dysesthesia, which were expected toxicities. No new safety signals were observed. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed, which did not exceed a prespecified toxicity rate of 25%. The median treatment duration was 2.37 months. No partial nor complete responses were observed. The study was halted early prior to entering an expansion phase, due to drug supply limitations. The tested dosing combinations of entinostat and capecitabine are likely safe in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. This study's clinical investigation of entinostat in breast cancer was halted, but drug development of this agent continues outside the US. There remains a need for postoperative adjuvant drug therapy for the subpopulation of breast cancer patients with high-risk residual cancer after curative therapy. This trial is registered with NCT03473639.

Trastuzumab and first-line taxane chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients with a HER2-negative tumor and HER2-positive circulating tumor cells: a phase II trial

PurposeHER2 overexpressing circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are observed in up to 25% of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. Since targeted anti-HER2 therapy has drastically improved clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, we hypothesized that patients with HER2 overexpressing CTCs might benefit from the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy.MethodsIn this single-arm, phase II trial, patients with HER2-positive CTCs received trastuzumab as addition to first-line treatment with taxane chemotherapy. Patients with detectable CTCs but without HER2 overexpression that received taxane chemotherapy only, were used as control group. The primary outcome measure was progression-free rate at 6 months (PFR6), with a target of 80%. In November 2022, the study was terminated early due to slow patient accrual.Results63 patients were screened, of which eight patients had HER2-positive CTCs and were treated with trastuzumab. The median number of CTCs was 15 per 7.5 ml of blood (range 1–131) in patients with HER2-positive CTCs, compared to median 5 (range 1–1047) in the control group. PFR6 was 50% in the trastuzumab group and 54% in the taxane monotherapy group, with no significant difference in median PFS (8 versus 9 months, p = 0.51).ConclusionNo clinical benefit of trastuzumab was observed, although this study was performed in a limited number of patients. Additionally, we observed a strong correlation between the number of evaluable CTCs and the presence of HER2-positive CTCs. We argue that randomized studies investigating agents that are proven to be solely effective in the HER2-positive patient group in patients with HER2-positive CTCs and HER2-negative tissue are currently infeasible. Several factors contribute to this impracticality, including the need for more stringent thresholds, and the rapidly evolving landscape of cancer treatments.

CDK4/6-Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced HR+/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Results and Correlative Biomarker Analyses of the KENDO Randomized Phase II Trial.

The optimal treatment approach for hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2-negative MBC) with aggressive characteristics remains controversial, with lack of randomized trials comparing cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6-inhibitors (CDK4/6i) + endocrine therapy (ET) with chemotherapy + ET. We conducted an open-label randomized phase II trial (NCT03227328) to investigate whether chemotherapy + ET is superior to CDK4/6i + ET for HR+/HER2-negative MBC with aggressive features. PAM50 intrinsic subtypes (IS), immunological features, and gene expression were assessed on baseline samples. Among 49 randomized patients (median follow-up: 35.2 months), median progression-free survival (mPFS) with chemotherapy + ET (11.2 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7-15.4) was numerically shorter than mPFS (19.9 months, 95% CI: 9.0-30.6) with CDK4/6i + ET (hazard ratio: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.75-2.64). Basal-like tumors under CDK4/6i + ET exhibited worse PFS (mPFS: 11.4 months, 95% CI: 3.00-not reached [NR]) and overall survival (OS; mOS: 18.8 months, 95% CI: 18.8-NR) compared to other subtypes (mPFS: 20.7 months, 95% CI: 9.00-33.4; mOS: NR, 95% CI: 24.4-NR). In the chemotherapy arm, luminal A tumors showed poorer PFS (mPFS: 5.1 months, 95% CI: 2.7-NR) than other IS (mPFS: 13.2 months, 95% CI: 10.6-28.1). Genes/pathways involved in BC cell survival and proliferation were associated with worse outcomes, as opposite to most immune-related genes/signatures, especially in the CDK4/6i arm. CD24 was the only gene significantly associated with worse PFS in both arms. Tertiary lymphoid structures and higher tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes also showed favorable survival trends in the CDK4/6i arm. The KENDO trial, although closed prematurely, adds further evidence supporting CDK4/6i + ET use in aggressive HR+/HER2-negative MBC instead of chemotherapy. PAM50 IS, genomic, and immunological features are promising biomarkers to personalize therapeutic choices.

Efficacy, safety, and predictive model of Palbociclib in the treatment of HR-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

PurposeThis research designeded to: 1. Analyze the efficacy and safety of Palbociclib treatment in HR-positive and HER2-negative (HR + /HER2-) metastatic breast cancer(MBC) patients. 2. Establish and validate a nomogram model for predicting the progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months in HR + /HER2- MBC patients after receiving Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET).Patients and methods1. This research retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of Palbociclib combined with ET in 214 patients with HR + /HER2- MBC. 2. A nomogram was designed and constructed with the retrospective clinical data of 214 patients with HR + /HER2- MBC who received Palbociclib plus ET at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital in China from August 2018 to August 2022. Among these patients, 161 were randomly assigned to the training cohort, while 53 to the validation cohort. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was assessed through the analysis the area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis(DCA).Results1. Median PFS was 7.17 months (95% CI: 7.61—10.05 months), with an objective response rate (ORR) of 2.80% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 34.58%. The most prevalent grade 3–4 adverse event was neutropenia (38.79%). 2. Multiple variable analysis of the training set revealed that age < 60 years old, PR < 20%, Ki-67 ≥ 20%, luminal B molecular subtype, primary resistance to ET, receipt of late-stage chemotherapy, and presence of liver metastasis or ≥ 2 visceral metastases were independent prognostic factors associated with poor PFS (P < 0.05). Then, the predictive model underwent development and validation utilizing the aforementioned parameters. On the one hand, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the training set at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months were 0.771, 0.783, and 0.790, respectively, indicating a strong predictive ability of the developed model. On the other hand, the AUC of the validation set at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months were 0.720, 0.766, and 0.754, respectively, suggesting the favorable discriminatory ability of the model. The calibration curves also exhibited a good fit with the ideal curves, and the DCA demonstrated the clinical applicability of the model. The nomogram's different scores could distinguish PFS.ConclusionThis retrospective study demonstrates the efficacy of Palbociclib in Chinese breast cancer patients. Moreover, the clinical parameters showed a significant association with the prognosis of HR + /HER2- MBC, and the prognostic models constructed based on these variables also displayed robust predictive power, which could offer more intuitive and convenient references for clinical doctors to formulate follow-up treatment plans.

What are the needs in oral antitumor therapy? An analysis of patients' and practitioners' preferences.

Since the European approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors in 2016, the treatment of patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer has changed significantly. Compared with chemotherapy, endocrine-based therapy has different treatment regimens and is associated with new side effects. Oral therapy aims for optimal drug efficacy and long treatment times while maintaining maximum independence and quality of life resulting in the conservation of medical staff resources. A monocentric analysis of therapy preferences of practitioners (25 nurses and physicians) and patients (11 on endocrine monotherapy, 17 on endocrine-based therapy, and 14 on intravenous chemotherapy) was performed using specific questionnaires. Preferences were assessed using a four-point Likert scale or bidirectional response options. All patients were highly supportive of oral therapy (mean agreement score on the Likert scale 1.3, p < 0.001 vs. all other options) and a consultation interval of 4 weeks (2.0, p = 0.015 vs. 3 weeks). Practitioners also preferred oral therapy (1.4) and visits every 4 weeks (1.6). In general, patients on oral therapies reported higher compatibility of their therapy with daily life than patients on chemotherapy (1.6 and 1.7 vs. 2.6, p = 0.006). Outpatient oncology is the main source of information for all patients, mainly in case of side effects (2.0) and open questions (1.8). Regarding oral antitumor therapy regimens, patients do not show a significant preference for a specific regimen, while practitioners prefer a continuous regimen (1.6) over a 21/7 regimen (21 days on and 7 days off therapy, 2.5). Patients are likely to accept mild side effects (e.g., neutropenia, diarrhea, polyneuropathy, fatigue) and would still adhere to their initial choice of regimen (continuous or 21/7). Only when side effects occur with a severity of CTCAE grade 3 do patients prefer the regimen in which the side effects occur for a shorter period of time. Patients and practitioners prefer oral antitumor therapy-both continuous and 21/7 regimens-over other application forms. Patient education and proper therapy management, supported by additional tools, contribute to the specific management of side effects and high adherence. This allows quality of life to be maintained during long-term therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Characterizing the Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy Plus Everolimus in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Harboring Altered PI3K/AKT/mTOR.

The clinical outcomes of chemotherapy (CT) for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative (TN) and hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have proven to be disappointing. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) pathway, a tumor-promoting signaling cascade frequently mutated in breast cancer (BC), has been implicated in chemoresistance. In this study, our objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of combining everolimus with chemotherapy in mBC patients exhibiting mutations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. We conducted a retrospective analysis to characterize the efficacy, safety, and their association with clinical and molecular characteristics of metastatic lesions in 14 patients with HER2- mBC. These patients harbored at least one altered member of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and were treated with a combination of a chemotherapy agent and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (CT+EVE). The majority of patients belonged to the triple-negative (TN) subtype (9/14, 64.3%), having already undergone 2 lines of chemotherapy (CT) in the metastatic setting (11, 78.6%). These patients carried altered phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) and were administered a vinorelbine-containing regimen (10, 71.4%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 42.9%, with a disease control rate of 92.9%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9-13.6) months and 14.3 (95% CI: 8.5-not reached (NR)) months, respectively. Patients with fewer prior treatment lines tended to exhibit longer PFS. OS, PFS, and ORR were comparable between hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but numerical improvements were noted in patients with a single PI3K pathway alteration compared to those with more than one alteration. Genomic alterations that surfaced upon progression on CT+EVE included cyclin dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, as well as neurofibromin 1 (NF1) mutation, suggesting potential mechanisms of acquired resistance. An analysis of adverse events indicated manageable toxicities. The findings of this study suggest both activity and safety for the combination of chemotherapy and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (CT+EVE) in patients with HER2- mBC who have alterations in the PI3K pathway, particularly those who have received fewer prior chemotherapy. However, it is crucial to note that large-scale, randomized control studies are warranted to more comprehensively characterize the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy.

Clinical Outcomes of HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Italy in the Last Decade: Results of the GIM 13-AMBRA Study.

GIM 13-AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study aimed at describing therapeutic strategies and the relative outcome parameters in 939 HER2-ve MBC patients. Taxanes-based regimens, or taxanes + targeted agents, mainly Bevacizumab, were the preferred first choice in both Luminal (30.2%) and TNBC (33.3%) patients. The median PFS1 was 12.5 months (95% CI 16.79-19.64), without any significant difference according to subtypes, while the median Time to first Treatment Change (TTC1) was significantly lower in TNBC patients (7.7 months-95% CI 5.7-9.2) in comparison to Luminal A (13.2 months, 95% CI 11.7-15.1) and Luminal B patients (11.8 months, 95% CI 10.3-12.8). PFS2 was significantly shorter in TNBC patients (5.5 months, 95% CI 4.3-6.5 vs. Luminal A-9.4, 95% CI 8.1-10.7, and Luminal B-7.7 95% CI 6.8-8.2, F-Ratio 4.30, p = 0.014). TTC2 was significantly lower in patients with TNBC than in those with the other two subtypes. The median OS1 was 35.2 months (95% CI 30.8-37.4) for Luminal A patients, which was significantly higher than that for both Luminal B (28.9 months, 95% CI 26.2-31.2) and TNBC (18.5 months, 95% CI 16-20.1, F-ratio 7.44, p = 0.0006). The GIM 13-AMBRA study is one of the largest collections ever published in Italy and provides useful results in terms of time outcomes for first, second, and further lines of treatment in HER2- MBC patients.

Efficacy of Single-Agent Chemotherapy in Endocrine Therapy-Refractory Metastatic Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic invasive lobular breast cancer (mILC) is distinct from invasive ductal cancer (IDC) in clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics, impacting its response to systemic therapy. While endocrine therapy (ET) combined with targeted therapies has shown efficacy in ET-sensitive mILC, data on chemotherapy in ET-refractory mILC remain limited. We investigated the efficacy of single-agent capecitabine (CAP) versus taxanes (TAX) in ET-refractory HR+ HER2-negative patients with mILC. Using data from the MD Anderson prospectively collected breast cancer database, we identified patients with HR+ HER2-negative mILC who received prior ET and first-time chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. We compared outcomes between 173 CAP-treated and 96 TAX-treated patients. CAP-treated patients had significantly better median progression-free survival (PFS) than TAX-treated patients (8.8 vs 5.0 months, HR 0.63, P < .001). Overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between the groups (42.7 vs 36.6 months for CAP vs TAX, respectively, HR 0.84, P = .241). Multivariate analyses for PFS and OS revealed better outcomes in subjects with fewer metastatic sites and those exposed to more lines of ET. Additionally, Black patients showed worse OS outcomes compared to White patients (HR 2.46; P = .001). In ET-refractory HR+ HER2-negative mILC, single-agent CAP demonstrated superior PFS compared to TAX. Our findings highlight the potential benefit of CAP in this patient subset, warranting further investigation through prospective trials.

Clinicopathological Evaluation of Patients with Hormone Receptor–Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing on Endocrine Treatment: A Real-World Retrospective Study from a Regional Cancer Center

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease with the primary aim of treatment being the improvement of the patient's quality of life and the delay of disease progression. A substantial proportion of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive MBC eventually experience progression despite endocrine treatment. As endocrine resistance remains a significant challenge, we aim to comprehend the intricate relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and the utility of various parameters as predictive markers for hormonal treatment response. This study, conducted at a single center, is ambispective in nature and includes hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2–negative MBC patients who progressed while on endocrine treatment, selected through purposeful sampling. Nominal data were analyzed in terms of frequency distribution, and continuous variables were represented as median/mean ± standard deviation. Spearman's correlation test and chi-square test were employed to examine variable dependencies. Data comparisons were performed using the independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, or Mann–Whitney's test. The majority of our study participants (n = 44, 64.70%) presented with de novo metastasis, while the remainder (n = 24, 35.29%) were patients who progressed from early-stage breast cancer to metastasis. The overall mean age of our study population at presentation was 47 ± 11 years. Patients with upfront stage 4 tumors presented at an older age, exhibited grade 2 tumors, had a higher frequency of bone-only metastasis, and experienced longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to patients who progressed from the early stage to metastasis. Multiple visceral involvements had a significant negative impact on PFS in contrast to cases with single visceral or bone-only involvement. No significant associations with PFS were observed for the Ki-67 index, first-line chemotherapy, or endocrine therapy. The extent of metastasis to various organs emerged as the most influential factor in determining PFS. Consequently, we propose the necessity for larger prospective studies aimed at identifying superior or additional biomarkers.

ASCO 2023: highlights in breast cancer

SummaryThe 2023 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) was again held in June 2023 in Chicago. While not immediately practice changing, results from several interesting studies in the field of breast cancer (BC) were reported. In the phase III NATALEE trial, the addition of 3 years of ribociclib to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy resulted in a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), making this the second positive study of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. A subgroup analysis from the MONARCHe trial indicated sustained benefit of adjuvant abemaciclib in the subset of patients with low dose intensity. Long-term outcome of the neoadjuvant phase II PHERgain trial indicated excellent iDFS results in patients receiving neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab without chemotherapy based upon PET metabolic response as a dynamic biomarker. In a biomarker analysis from the SOFT trial, more high-risk tumors were observed in the very young patient subset, while the PAM50 risk-of-recurrence score was not predictive for benefit of ovarian function suppression. A large retrospective analysis evaluated the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in small, node-negative triple-negative breast cancer. A clear benefit for chemotherapy was only seen in tumors &gt; 10 mm of size. In metastatic HR-positive breast cancer, the PALMIRA trial with palbociclib beyond progression yielded negative results. An update from the PADA-1 trial again indicates the promising role of repeated liquid biopsies for treatment guidance in metastatic disease. Patritumab deruxtecan, a HER3-directed antibody–drug conjugate yielded promising response rates in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. In addition, several retrospective analyses focused on the important question of treatment sequencing.

PP172 Comparative analysis of efficacy of first-line CDK 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy in HR-positive, Her2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Real world experience

PP172 Comparative analysis of efficacy of first-line CDK 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy in HR-positive, Her2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Real world experience