Hepatitis C Virus Nucleic Acid Testing Research Articles

Racial and Gender Disparities in Transplantation of Hepatitis C+ Hearts and Lungs

BackgroundTransplanting organs from hepatitis c virus (HCV) infected donors into HCV-negative recipients has led to thousands of more transplants in the US since 2016. Studies have demonstrated disparities in utilization of kidneys from these donors due to gender and education. It is still unknown, however, if the same disparities are seen in heart and lung transplantation. MethodsWe used Organ Procurement and Transplantation (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data on all isolated heart and lung transplants from 11/01/2018- 03/31/2023, classifying donors based on their HCV nucleic acid test (NAT) result: HCV NAT- vs HCV NAT+. We fit separate mixed effects logistic regression models (outcome: HCV-NAT+ donor) for heart and lung transplants. Primary covariates included: 1) race/ethnicity; 2) sex; 3) education level; 4) insurance type; and 5) transplant year. ResultsThe study included 26,108 adults (14,189 isolated heart transplant recipients and 11,919 isolated lung transplant recipients). 993 (7.0%) heart transplants involved an HCV-NAT+ donor, compared to 457 (3.8%) lung transplants. In multivariable models among all isolated heart transplant recipients, women were significantly less likely to receive an HCV-NAT+ donor heart (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, P=0.003), as were Asian patients (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31=0.86, P= 0.01). In multivariable models among all isolated lung transplant recipients, Asians were significantly less likely to receive HCV-NAT+ transplants (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.77, P= 0.01). ConclusionThere are disparities in utilization of heart and lungs from HCV NAT+ donors, with women and Asian patients being significantly less likely to receive these transplants.

Early Assessment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Risk Among Recipients of Hepatitis C Virus-infected Donors in the Current Era

BackgroundTransplantation of hearts from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors has increased substantially in recent years following development of highly effective direct-acting antiviral therapies for treatment and cure of HCV. Although historical data from the pre–direct-acting antiviral era demonstrated an association between HCV-positive donors and accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in recipients, the relationship between the use of HCV nucleic acid test–positive (NAT+) donors and the development of CAV in the direct-acting antiviral era remains unclear. Methods and ResultsWe performed a retrospective, single-center observational study comparing coronary angiographic CAV outcomes during the first year after transplant in 84 heart transplant recipients of HCV NAT+ donors and 231 recipients of HCV NAT– donors. Additionally, in a subsample of 149 patients (including 55 in the NAT+ cohort and 94 in the NAT– cohort) who had serial adjunctive intravascular ultrasound examination performed, we compared development of rapidly progressive CAV, defined as an increase in maximal intimal thickening of ≥0.5 mm in matched vessel segments during the first year post-transplant. In an unadjusted analysis, recipients of HCV NAT+ hearts had reduced survival free of CAV ≥1 over the first year after heart transplant compared with recipients of HCV NAT– hearts. After adjustment for known CAV risk factors, however, there was no significant difference between cohorts in the likelihood of the primary outcome, nor was there a difference in development of rapidly progressive CAV. ConclusionsThese findings support larger, longer-term follow-up studies to better elucidate CAV outcomes in recipients of HCV NAT+ hearts and to inform post-transplant management strategies.

Gender differences in risk exposures for acute hepatitis C infection in Taiwan: a nationwide case–control study

BackgroundIn Taiwan, medical providers are required to report all acute hepatitis C (AHC) patients to National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NNDSS). Identifying factors associated with AHC may inform the strategies to prevent the spread of hepatitis C virus (HCV). We used the national surveillance data to assess gender difference in risk factors associated with AHC in Taiwan and propose control measures in at-risk groups.MethodsWe conducted a nationwide case–control study using data from NNDSS and AHC case investigation questionnaires, for the period of March 6, 2014–December 31, 2016. Cases were AHC confirmed in NNDSS; controls were reported AHC with negative HCV nucleic acid test and negative serum anti-HCV antibody. We used bivariate analysis to identify characteristics and risk exposures for AHC and conducted gender stratified analyses.ResultsWe identified 602 AHC cases (66.9% males, median age 48 years) and 90 controls. Older age, male gender (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.18–2.90), history of viral hepatitis (OR: 7.93, 95% CI:1.91–32.88), history of sexually transmitted infections (OR: 21.02, 95% CI: 2.90–152.43), and having healthcare-associated risk exposures (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.25–3.25) were associated with AHC. Stratified analyses showed receiving intravenous infusion, history of hepatitis B, syphilis, and human immunodeficiency virus infection were risk factors for male AHC; receiving hemodialysis was risk factor for females.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates risk factors for AHC in Taiwan with gender difference. Proper infection control practices in healthcare settings and interventions targeting male patients with HIV and other STIs, remain crucial to prevent individuals from AHC.

Demographics and Utilization of Hepatitis C Hearts: A Single Center Experience

<h3>Purpose</h3> Since the advent of direct acting antiviral therapies as a cure for hepatitis C virus (HCV), the use of HCV nucleic acid test (NAT) positive donors in adult heart transplantation is increasing. The degree to which HCV NAT+ donor characteristics may impact donor selection remains unclear. We sought to explore the demographics and organ acceptance and transplantation rates of HCV NAT+ donor offers to our center, relative to those of other donor offers. <h3>Methods</h3> We used the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) DonorNet database to evaluate 1,000 consecutive primary donor offers made to our center between January 1, 2018 and March 3, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA tests. <h3>Results</h3> Of 1,000 donor offers evaluated by our center, 238 were HCV antibody (Ab) positive of which 177 were HCV NAT positive. Compared to other donors, HCV NAT+ donors tended to be younger, male, and to die more often from drug overdose. Despite procurement teams having to travel longer distances to recover them, HCV NAT+ donors had higher rates of organ acceptance and ultimate transplantation relative to other donors. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Favorable demographic characteristics of HCV NAT+ donors are associated with higher rates of organ acceptance and transplantation at our center, despite longer procurement distances. Especially given the promising early outcomes among recipients of these donors, we anticipate that the rate of HCV NAT+ donor utilization will soon eclipse that of HCV naïve donor utilization nationwide.

Comparable Survival for Hepatitis C–Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation Irrespective of Viremic Status

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is efficacious and well-tolerated in the post-liver transplant (LT) setting, prompting increased use of donors with HCV infection in patients waitlisted for LT.1,2 Although the incidence of nonviral hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rising, HCV remains the most common risk factor for HCC among patients listed for LT in the United States.3 The use and outcomes of HCV-infected donors among patients with active HCV viremia waitlisted for (HCV-HCC) is lacking. Our aim was to evaluate post-LT survival among patients with HCV-HCC based on both recipient (active vs cured HCV) and donor (HCV+ vs HCV-) viremic status. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry, we analyzed all adult patients with HCV-HCC who underwent LT and had available recipient/donor HCV nucleic acid test (NAT) results from March 31, 2015 (date UNOS began reporting donor NAT) through June 30, 2021. Patients with acute liver failure, simultaneous organ transplant, previous LT, and those missing recipient and/or donor NAT results were excluded.

Enhancing Linkage to Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Following Pregnancy in Women Identified During Perinatal Care.

Amid the current US opioid crisis, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection rates continue to rise in young adults, including among pregnant women, yet few studies describe linkage to care and treatment in pregnant or postpartum women with HCV infection. We used electronic health record data to estimate HCV treatment rates for postpartum women before (January 2014‐September 2016) and during (October 2016‐March 2018) implementation of a maternal–infant HCV linkage program in combination with a multidisciplinary clinic to colocate mother and infant care. Using Poisson regression models, we compared HCV treatment initiation rates, adjusting for demographics, substance use, and treatment. From January 2014 through March 2018, 343 women who were HCV seropositive delivered at our institution. Of these, 95% completed HCV nucleic acid testing and 255 women had chronic HCV infection. Mean age was 30 years, 96% were publicly insured, and 94% had documented substance use. HCV treatment initiation increased from 28/164 (17.1%) women with chronic HCV infection in the preintervention period to 16/66 (24.2%) with the linkage‐only intervention and 13/25 (52.0%) with the linkage intervention and colocated care. Adjusted analyses demonstrated that women delivering during the intervention period initiated HCV treatment at 2.40 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10‐5.25; linkage only) and 3.36 times (95% CI, 1.57‐7.17; linkage and colocated care) the rate of women delivering preintervention. Women on buprenorphine had higher HCV treatment initiation rates compared with those on methadone (rate ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.05‐4.21). Conclusion: HCV linkage to care and treatment rates improved in the setting of mother–infant linkage and colocated care interventions. Perinatal care may represent a critical venue to identify, link, and treat women for HCV infection to improve their own health and prevent transmission to subsequent pregnancies.

Outcomes of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid testing positive donors in aviremic recipients with delayed direct-acting antiviral initiation.

The use of allografts from hepatitis C virus (HCV) Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT)+ donors into HCV NAT- recipients has been reported to be efficacious in a handful of studies. However, these studies have not reflected real-world practice where the initiation of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) is dependent on insurance coverage. A single-center, retrospective chart review of HCV NAT- recipients who underwent solid organ transplantation (SOT) from a HCV NAT+ donor between April 1, 2019 and May 27, 2020 was conducted. Sixty-one HCV NAT- patients underwent SOT with a HCV NAT+ organ, with 59 transplant recipients included for evaluation: 22 kidney (KT), 18 liver (LiT), 10 heart (HT), nine lung (LuT). HCV transmission occurred in 100% of recipients. Average time to DAA initiation was POD 46.3 ± 25 days. SVR12 was achieved in 98% (56/57; two patients ineligible for analysis). Treatment failure occurred in one LuT on glecaprevir/pibrentasvir with P32del and Q80K mutations. No patients developed fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Two patients died, secondary to anastomotic complication (LuT) and pulmonary embolism (HT). Clinically significant rejection was diagnosed and treated in two HT (one patient with ACR2 and one with ACR2/pAMR2) and one LiT (RAI 5/9). Six patients (10.2%) had documented adverse effects attributed to DAA therapy, primarily gastrointestinal.

Outcomes of hepatitis C virus seropositive donors to hepatitis C virus seronegative liver recipients: A large single center analysis

Introduction and objectivesThe success of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has transformed the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and has led to the expansion of the deceased donor organ pool for liver transplantation. Material and methodsWe present a single center retrospective review of liver transplantations performed on HCV-seronegative recipients from HCV-seropositive organs from 11/2017 to 05/2020. HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was performed on HCV-seropositive donors to assess active HCV infection. Results42 HCV-seronegative recipients underwent a liver transplant from a HCV-seropositive donor, including 21 NAT negative (20 liver, 1 simultaneous liver kidney transplant) and 21 NAT positive liver transplants. Two (9.5%) HCV antibody positive/NAT negative recipients developed HCV viremia and achieved sustained virologic response with DAA therapy. The remaining patients with available data (19 patients) remained polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative at 6 months. 20 (95%) of HCV antibody positive/NAT positive recipients had a confirmed HCV viremia. 100% of patients with available data (15 patients) achieved SVR. Observed events include 1 mortality and graft loss and equivalent rates of post-transplant complications between NAT positive and NAT negative recipients. ConclusionsHCV-seropositive organs can be safely transplanted into HCV-seronegative patients with minimal complications post-transplant.

Trends in the use of hepatitis C viremic donor hearts

ObjectiveTo examine trends in utilization of hearts from hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors for transplantation, a strategy to expand organ availability. MethodsThe United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was queried for adult patients undergoing heart transplantation between 2015 and 2019. We excluded multiorgan transplants, incomplete data, and loss to follow-up. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) defined HCV status. ResultsBetween 2015 and 2019, a total of 11,393 adults underwent heart transplantation: 326 from HCV NAT+ donors and 11,067 from NAT− donors. The use of NAT+ hearts increased from 1 in 2015 to 137 in 2018 against a static number of NAT− organs. The use of NAT+ hearts varied significantly across regions and individual centers. More than 75% of NAT+ hearts were transplanted in the Northeast region, leading to further travel (mean, 299 miles vs 173 miles for NAT− transplantations; P < .001), with longer ischemic times (mean: 3.52 hours vs 3.10 hours; P < .001). More than one-half of NAT+ transplantations were performed by 5 individual centers, and a single institution accounted for >20% of all transplantations from viremic donors. Survival in the 2 groups did not differ by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = .240), and multivariable regression showed no differences in acute rejection (P = .455) or 30-day mortality (P = .490). Of the 326 recipients of NAT+ hearts, 38 seroconverted and 14 became viremic within 1 year. Survival was 100% in the viremic patients and 97.4% in seroconverted patients at 1 year. ConclusionsHeart transplantation from HCV viremic donors continues to increase but varies significantly across UNOS regions and individual centers. Short-term outcomes are comparable, but effects of seroconversion and long-term outcomes remain unclear.

Assessing Solid Organ Donors and Monitoring Transplant Recipients for Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B Virus, and Hepatitis C Virus Infection - U.S. Public Health Service Guideline, 2020.

SummaryThe recommendations in this report supersede the U.S Public Health Service (PHS) guideline recommendations for reducing transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) through organ transplantation (Seem DL, Lee I, Umscheid CA, Kuehnert MJ. PHS guideline for reducing human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus transmission through organ transplantation. Public Health Rep 2013;128:247–343), hereafter referred to as the 2013 PHS guideline. PHS evaluated and revised the 2013 PHS guideline because of several advances in solid organ transplantation, including universal implementation of nucleic acid testing of solid organ donors for HIV, HBV, and HCV; improved understanding of risk factors for undetected organ donor infection with these viruses; and the availability of highly effective treatments for infection with these viruses. PHS solicited feedback from its relevant agencies, subject-matter experts, additional stakeholders, and the public to develop revised guideline recommendations for identification of risk factors for these infections among solid organ donors, implementation of laboratory screening of solid organ donors, and monitoring of solid organ transplant recipients. Recommendations that have changed since the 2013 PHS guideline include updated criteria for identifying donors at risk for undetected donor HIV, HBV, or HCV infection; the removal of any specific term to characterize donors with HIV, HBV, or HCV infection risk factors; universal organ donor HIV, HBV, and HCV nucleic acid testing; and universal posttransplant monitoring of transplant recipients for HIV, HBV, and HCV infections. The recommendations are to be used by organ procurement organization and transplant programs and are intended to apply only to solid organ donors and recipients and not to donors or recipients of other medical products of human origin (e.g., blood products, tissues, corneas, and breast milk). The recommendations pertain to transplantation of solid organs procured from donors without laboratory evidence of HIV, HBV, or HCV infection. Additional considerations when transplanting solid organs procured from donors with laboratory evidence of HCV infection are included but are not required to be incorporated into Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network policy. Transplant centers that transplant organs from HCV-positive donors should develop protocols for obtaining informed consent, testing and treating recipients for HCV, ensuring reimbursement, and reporting new infections to public health authorities.

Hepatitis C Virus NAT-Positive Solid Organ Allografts Transplanted Into Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Recipients: A Real-World Experience.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic organs are underutilized, and there is limited real-world experience on the transplantation of HCV-viremic solid organs into recipients who are HCV negative. Patients listed or being evaluated for solid organ transplant after January 26, 2018, were educated and consented by protocol on the transplantation of HCV-viremic organs. All recipients were HCV nucleic acid test and anti-HCV antibody negative at the time of transplant and received an HCV-viremic organ. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) at 12 weeks after completion of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy (SVR12 ). Seventy-seven patients who were HCV negative underwent solid organ transplantation from a donor who was HCV viremic. No patients had evidence of advanced hepatic fibrosis. Treatment regimen and duration were at the discretion of the hepatologist. Sixty-four patients underwent kidney transplant (KT), and 58 KT recipients had either started or completed DAA therapy. Forty-one achieved SVR12 , 10 had undetectable viral loads but are not eligible for SVR12 , and 7 remain on treatment. One KT recipient was a nonresponder because of nonstructural protein 5A resistance. Four patients underwent liver transplant and 2 underwent liver-kidney transplant. Three patients achieved SVR12 , 1 has completed DAA therapy, and 2 remain on treatment. Six patients underwent heart transplant and 1 underwent heart-kidney transplant. Six patients achieved SVR12 and 1 patient remains on treatment. Limited data exist on the transplantation of HCV-viremic organs into recipients who are HCV negative. Our study is the largest to describe a real-world experience of the transplantation of HCV-viremic organs into recipients who are aviremic. In carefully selected patients, the use of HCV-viremic grafts in the DAA era appears to be efficacious and well tolerated.

Liver, simultaneous liver-kidney, and kidney transplantation from hepatitis C-positive donors in hepatitis C-negative recipients: A single-center study.

Transplantation of organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-antibody (Ab) and -nucleic acid test (NAT) positive donors into HCV-negative recipients has been proposed to expand the donor pool and shorten waiting times. Data on early single-center outcomes are lacking. Nineteen liver (LT, including seven simultaneous liver-kidney [SLKT]) and 17 kidney transplant (KT) recipients received organs from HCV (+) donors; of these, 13 were HCV NAT (+) in each group. All patients who received organs from HCV NAT (+) donors developed HCV viremia post-transplant except for 2 KT recipients. Patients were treated with a variety of direct-acting antiviral regimens, with high rates of sustained virologic response among those with at least 12weeks of follow-up past the end of treatment: 12/13 (92%) and 8/8 (100%) among LT/SLKT, and KT recipients. Median time to treatment start was 42days (interquartile range [IQR] 35-118days) and 40days (IQR 26-73) post-LT/SLKT and KT, respectively. One death occurred in a SLKT recipient unrelated to HCV or its treatment. There was no significant increase in rejection, proteinuria, or changes in immunosuppression in any group. Organs from HCV-viremic donors can be utilized for HCV-uninfected recipients with good short-term outcomes.

Ultra-short duration direct acting antiviral prophylaxis to prevent virus transmission from hepatitis C viremic donors to hepatitis C negative kidney transplant recipients.

We conducted an adaptive design single-center pilot trial between October 2017 and November 2018 to determine the safety and efficacy of ultra-short-term perioperative pangenotypic direct acting antiviral (DAA) prophylaxis for deceased hepatitis C virus (HCV)-nucleic acid test (NAT) positive donors to HCV negative kidney recipients (D+/R-). In Group 1, 10 patients received one dose of SOF/VEL (sofusbuvir/velpatasvir) pretransplant and one dose on posttransplant Day 1. In Group 2A (N=15) and the posttrial validation (Group 2B; N=25) phase, patients received two additional SOF/VEL doses (total 4) on Days 2 and 3 posttransplant. Development of posttransplant HCV transmission triggered 12-week DAA therapy. For available donor samples (N=27), median donor viral load was 1.37E+06IU/mL (genotype [GT]1a: 70%; GT2: 7%; GT3: 23%). Overall viral transmission rate was 12% (6/50; Group 1:30% [3/10]; Group 2A:13% [2/15]; Group 2B:4% [1/25]). For the 6 viremic patients, 5 (83%) achieved sustained virologic response (3 with first-line DAA therapy; and two after retreatment with second-line DAA). At a median follow-up of 8months posttransplant, overall patient and allograft survivals were 98%, respectively. The 4-day strategy reduced viral transmission to 7.5% (3/40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8%-20.5%) and could result in avoidance of prolonged posttransplant DAA therapy for most D+/R-transplants.

Temporal Changes and Regional Variation in Acceptance of Hepatitis C Virus-Viremic Livers.

The high efficacy of current hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy and increased numbers of HCV-infected deceased donors have changed the paradigm of HCV in liver transplantation (LT). Modeling studies have been performed to evaluate the optimal timing of HCV treatment (before versus after LT) in HCV-infected patients and to assess the cost-effectiveness of transplanting HCV-infected livers into HCV- patients. However, these models rely on historical data and have not quantified the temporal changes in the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at transplant of recipients of an HCV-infected liver across geographic areas. We performed a retrospective cohort study of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data of nonstatus 1 deceased donor LT recipients from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018, and we calculated the difference in allocation MELD score in recipients of HCV nucleic acid test (NAT)- versus NAT+ livers by year and UNOS region. We used Pearson correlation coefficients to assess the relationship between MELD score difference in recipients of HCV NAT+ versus HCV NAT- livers and the proportion of non-HCV recipients of HCV NAT+ livers. Nationally, the allocation MELD score difference at LT in recipients of HCV NAT+ versus NAT- livers did not change (4-point difference). This stability was seen in regions 3, 5, and 10. In regions 1, 7, 8, 9, and 11, the MELD score difference decreased, which is a diminishing advantage. However, in regions 2 and 4, it increased, which is a rising advantage. In 2018, recipients of HCV NAT+ livers had a lower MELD score in 9/11 regions, and the MELD score advantage of accepting HCV NAT+ livers had a moderate inverse correlation with the regional use in non-HCV patients (r=-0.53). These data should be used to inform clinicians of the pre- and post-LT trade-offs of HCV treatment.

Infections and associated behaviors among deceased organ donors: Informing the assessment of risk.

For infectious disease risk assessment among deceased organ donors, pre-donation clinical, microbiological, and behavioral information are reviewed; however, uncertainty may arise due to false negative screening results of recently acquired infections. The burden of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and residual risks (RR) of undetected virus was estimated, with the impact of more sensitive screening. For United Kingdom potential deceased organ donors between 2010 and 2014, prevalence of HBsAg was 0.1%, HIV 0.06% and HCV 0.9%, increasing to 25.7% in people who injected drugs (PWID). Incidence, derived from new blood donors, was multiplied by duration of screening assay window periods to give RR per 100000 donors as 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-3.99) for HBV, 0.08 (95% CI 0.02-0.21) for HIV, and 5.96 (95% CI 0.82-37.89) for HCV. For PWID, HCV RR was 163.3 (95% CI 22.8-1107.8) compared to 2.76 (95% CI 0.35-17.36) for non-PWID. RR decreased significantly with nucleic acid testing (NAT), and, for HCV, antigen testing had a similar impact. While the burden of HCV risk lies within PWID, these are in small numbers therefore few HCV antigen or NAT tests would be needed to more accurately assess risk.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) non-viremic recipients with HCV viremic donors.

In the context of organ shortage, the opioid epidemic, and effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV), more HCV-infected donor organs may be used for liver transplantation. Current data regarding outcomes after donor-derived HCV in previously non-viremic liver transplant recipients are limited. Clinical data for adult liver transplant recipients with donor-derived HCV infection from March 2017 to January 2018 at our institution were extracted from the medical record. Ten patients received livers from donors known to be infected with HCV based on positive nucleic acid testing. Seven had a prior diagnosis of HCV and were treated before liver transplantation. All recipients were non-viremic at the time of transplantation. All 10 recipients derived hepatitis C infection from their donor and achieved sustained virologic response at 12weeks posttreatment with DAA-based regimens, with a median time from transplant to treatment initiation of 43days (IQR 20-59). There have been no instances of graft loss or death, with median follow-up of 380days (IQR 263-434) posttransplant. Transplantation of HCV-viremic livers into non-viremic recipients results in acceptable short-term outcomes. Such strategies may be used to expand the donor pool and increase access to liver transplantation.

Increasing Trends in Transplantation of HCV–Positive Livers Into Uninfected Recipients

The introduction of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents and the opioid epidemic have resulted in an increased interest in liver transplantation (LT) of organs from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related viremia.1 In March of 2015, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) implemented a policy to perform HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) in all HCV-seropositive donors. An open-label, single-center experience with 10 patients using a multistep informed consent reported successful transplantation of HCV-seropositive viremic (HCV-V) kidneys into HCV-seronegative recipients.2 Subsequently, a case was reported in which an HCV-V liver was transplanted into a HCV-seronegative recipient.3 In collaboration with OPTN/UNOS, we identified cases in which HCV-V deceased donor livers were transplanted into HCV-seronegative recipients.

Utilization of Organs From Donors According to Hepatitis C Antibody and Nucleic Acid Testing Status: Time for Change.

Previous studies have grouped all donors positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (Ab). Only recently has donor HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) become routine, and the impact of Ab and NAT status on organ utilization is unknown. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified 9290 donors from 2015 to 2016 for whom both HCV Ab and NAT data were available and compared organ utilization by HCV status. Overall, 93.8% of donors were Ab negative and NAT negative (Ab-NAT-), 0.15% were Ab negative and NAT positive, 1.8% were Ab positive and NAT negative (Ab+NAT-), and 4.2% were both Ab and NAT positive (Ab+NAT+). Ab-NAT- donors donated at the highest rate for all organs except livers, of which Ab+NAT- donors donated at a higher rate (81.2% vs 73.2%, p=0.03). Livers were discarded for reasons related to abnormal biopsies in Ab+NAT+ donors, whereas kidneys from Ab- or NAT-positive donors were discarded for reasons related to HCV status. Using a propensity score-matched model, we estimated that using Ab+NAT- donors at the same rate as Ab-NAT- donors could result in 48 more kidney donors, 37 more heart donors, and 15 more lung donors annually. We urge the use of HCV Ab+NAT- donors for appropriately selected and consenting recipients.

Residual risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infections by blood transfusion in northern Brazil.

Nucleic acid test (NAT) blood screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) was introduced in northern Brazil in July 2012. There are several Brazilian articles that have evaluated transfusion transmission risks for HIV and HCV. However, to our knowledge, this article is the first to evaluate the impact of HIV and HCV NAT implementation for blood screening in northern Brazil. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and incidence rates of HIV and HCV among blood donors and to compare the residual risk of transfusion transmission of these infections, before (2009-2011) and after (2012-2014) NAT implementation. HIV and HCV prevalence and incidence were calculated based on rates of confirmed positive samples. Residual risk estimates were based on the incidence and window model described previously. Logistic and Poisson regressions were used in the statistical analysis. A p value of not more than 0.05 was considered significant. HIV and HCV prevalence were 209.9 and 66.3 per 100,000 donations, respectively. Residual risk for HIV and HCV decreased significantly throughout the two study periods, mainly for HCV in which the reduction was one in 169,492 to one in 769,231 donations. For HIV, the decrease was one in 107,527 to one in 769,231 donations. HIV and HCV incidence rates were 21.13 and 3.06 per 100,000 persons/year before NAT and 14.03 and 2.65 per 100,000 persons/year after NAT. The HIV and HCV NAT implementation significantly increased the transfusion safety in northern Brazil, bringing benefits to recipients due to better quality of blood products produced.

Clinical utility of HCV core antigen detection and quantification using serum samples and dried blood spots in people who inject drugs in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.

Introduction: A lack of access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) diagnostics is a significant barrier to achieving the World Health Organization 2030 global elimination goal. HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) quantification and dried blood spot (DBS) are appealing alternatives to conventional HCV serology and nucleic acid testing (NAT) for resource-constraint settings, particularly in difficult-to-reach populations. We assessed the accuracy of serum and DBS HCVcAg testing in people who inject drugs in Tanzania using HCV NAT as a reference. Method: Between May and July 2015, consecutive HCV-seropositive patients enrolled in the local opioid substitution treatment centre were invited to participate in the study. All had HCV RNA detection (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA), genotyping (NS5B gene phylogenetic analysis) and HCVcAg on blood samples and DBS (Architect assay; Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Out of 153 HCV-seropositive individuals, 65 (42.5%) and 15 (9.8%) were co-infected with HIV (41 (63%) were on anti-retroviral therapy (ARVs)) and hepatitis B respectively. In total, 116 were viraemic, median viral load of 5.7 (Interquartile range (IQR); 4.0–6.3) log iU/ml (75 (68.2%) were genotype 1a, 35 (31.8%) genotype 4a). The median alanine transaminase (ALT) (iU/l), aspartate transaminase (AST) (iU/l) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (iU/l) were 35 (IQR; 23–51), 46 (32–57) and 69 (35–151) respectively. For the quantification of HCV RNA, serum HCVcAg had a sensitivity at 99.1% and a specificity at 94.1%, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) at 0.99 (95% CI 0.98–1.00). DBS HCVcAg had a sensitivity of 76.1% and a specificity of 97.3%, with an AUROC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83–0.92). HCVcAg performance did not differ by HIV co-infection or HCV genotype. Conclusions: Our study suggests that HCVcAg testing in serum is an excellent alternative to HCV polymerase chain reaction in Africa. Although HCVcAg detection and quantification in DBS has a reduced sensitivity, its specificity and accuracy are good and it could therefore be used for scaling up HCV testing and care in resource-limited African settings.