Abstract
BackgroundTransplanting organs from hepatitis c virus (HCV) infected donors into HCV-negative recipients has led to thousands of more transplants in the US since 2016. Studies have demonstrated disparities in utilization of kidneys from these donors due to gender and education. It is still unknown, however, if the same disparities are seen in heart and lung transplantation. MethodsWe used Organ Procurement and Transplantation (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data on all isolated heart and lung transplants from 11/01/2018- 03/31/2023, classifying donors based on their HCV nucleic acid test (NAT) result: HCV NAT- vs HCV NAT+. We fit separate mixed effects logistic regression models (outcome: HCV-NAT+ donor) for heart and lung transplants. Primary covariates included: 1) race/ethnicity; 2) sex; 3) education level; 4) insurance type; and 5) transplant year. ResultsThe study included 26,108 adults (14,189 isolated heart transplant recipients and 11,919 isolated lung transplant recipients). 993 (7.0%) heart transplants involved an HCV-NAT+ donor, compared to 457 (3.8%) lung transplants. In multivariable models among all isolated heart transplant recipients, women were significantly less likely to receive an HCV-NAT+ donor heart (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, P=0.003), as were Asian patients (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31=0.86, P= 0.01). In multivariable models among all isolated lung transplant recipients, Asians were significantly less likely to receive HCV-NAT+ transplants (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.77, P= 0.01). ConclusionThere are disparities in utilization of heart and lungs from HCV NAT+ donors, with women and Asian patients being significantly less likely to receive these transplants.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
