Abstract
BackgroundThis analysis compared effects of the activin signaling inhibitor, sotatercept, across pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) subgroups stratified by baseline cardiac index (CI). MethodsPooled data from PULSAR (N=106; NCT03496207) and STELLAR (N=323; NCT04576988) were analyzed using two different CI thresholds, < and ≥ 2.0 L/min/m2 or 2.5 L/min/m2. Median differences in change from baseline at week 24 were evaluated using Hodges-Lehmann (HL) estimator and mean differences by least squares (LS), with 95% confidence intervals and p-values; p=0.05 was significant. Categorial endpoints and time-to-clinical worsening were analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Cox model (hazard ratio (HR), respectively, without multiplicity adjustment. ResultsOf 429 participants, 51 and 378 had CI <2.0 L/min/m2 and ≥ 2.0 L/min/m2, respectively, whereas 179 and 250 had CI <2.5 L/min/m2 and ≥ 2.5 L/min/m2, respectively. Across all CI subgroups, sotatercept vs placebo significantly improved median 6-minute walk distance (range: 33.9 to 63.7 m: p<0.001), pulmonary vascular resistance (range: -202.8 to -395.4 dyn•s•cm-5; p≤0.002), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (range: -317.3 to -1041.2 pg/mL; p<0.001). LS means showed reductions in pulmonary and right atrial pressures, decreased right ventricular size and enhanced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/ systolic pulmonary artery pressure in all subgroups. Sotatercept significantly delayed time to first occurrence of death or a worsening event in the subset of participants with CI ≥2.5 (HR 0.12; p<0.001), ≥2.0 (HR 0.13; p<0.001), and <2.5 (HR 0.21; p<0.001) L/min/m2. Improvements in World Health Organization functional class (all p<0.050) and European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society risk score (all p<0.001) were seen within each subgroup. ConclusionsEfficacy and safety were consistent across baseline CI subgroups, supporting use of sotatercept in PAH patients irrespective of baseline cardiac hemodynamics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.