Hepatitis C Virus Ag Assay Research Articles

Diagnostic performance of hepatitis C core antigen assay to identify active infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (HCVcAg) assay is an alternative for diagnosing HCV infection in a single step. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay's diagnostic performance (validity and utility) for diagnosing active hepatitis C. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until 10 January 2023. The protocol was registered at the prospective international register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022337191). Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay was the test for evaluation, and nucleic acid amplification tests with a cut-off ≤50IU/mL were the gold standard. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA with the MIDAS module and random-effects models. The bivariate analysis was conducted on 46 studies (18,116 samples). The pooled sensitivity was 0.96 (95% CI=0.94-0.97), specificity 0.99 (95% CI=0.99-1.00), positive likelihood ratio 141.81 (95% CI=72.39-277.79), and negative likelihood ratio 0.04 (95% CI=0.03-0.06). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 1.00 (95% CI=0.34-1.00). For active hepatitis C prevalence values of 0.1%-15%, the probability that a positive test was a true positive was 12%-96%, respectively, indicating that a confirmatory test should be necessary, particularly with a prevalence ≤5%. However, the probability that a negative test was a false negative was close to zero, indicating the absence of HCV infection. The validity (accuracy) of the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay for screening active HCV infection in serum/plasma samples was excellent. Although the HCVcAg assay showed limited diagnostic utility in low prevalence settings (≤1%), it might help diagnose hepatitis C in high prevalence scenarios (≥5%).

Diagnostic Performance of the HCV Core Antigen Test To Identify Hepatitis C in HIV-Infected Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The standard algorithm for diagnosing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has two steps, an HCV antibody test for screening and a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for confirmation. However, the HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) detection assay is an alternative for one-step diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay to detect active hepatitis C in serum/plasma in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), through a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched until 20 September 2022 (PROSPERO, CRD42022348351). We included studies evaluating Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay (index assay) versus NAATs (reference test) in PLWHA coinfected with HCV who did not receive antiviral treatment for HCV. Meta-analysis was performed with the MIDAS module using Stata and random-effects models. The QUADAS-2 tool evaluated the risk of bias. The bivariate analysis was conducted on 11 studies with 2,407 samples. Pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.92 to 0.97), specificity 0.97 (95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99), positive likelihood ratio 37.76 (95% CI = 12.84 to 111.02), and negative likelihood ratio 0.06 (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.09). The area under the curve was 0.97 (95% CI = 0.20 to 1.00). For low prevalence (≤5%), the posttest probability that an individual with a positive test was a true positive ranged from 4% to 67%, whereas, at high prevalence (≥10%), the posttest probability was between 81% and 87%, indicating that a confirmatory test should be necessary, particularly with prevalence values of ≤1%. Regardless of prevalence, the probability that an individual with a negative test was a false negative was close to zero, indicating that the individual was not infected with HCV. In conclusion, the accuracy of the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay was very good for HCV screening in serum/plasma samples from PLWHA. The clinical utility to confirm HCV infection was acceptable in high-prevalence settings (≥10%) but poor in low-prevalence settings (≤1%). Furthermore, it was excellent in excluding active HCV infection.

Evaluation of Hepatitis C Virus Core Antigen Assay in a Resource-Limited Setting in Pakistan.

The diagnosis of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can be challenging due to its cost and a lack of access to centralized testing. There is an urgent need to develop simplified HCV testing algorithms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of a Hepatitis C core antigen (HCVcAg) assay in a decentralized, resource-limited setting. This is a descriptive cross-sectional study from a highly endemic area of Karachi, Pakistan. Between October 2019 and July 2020, subjects aged 12 years and above who screened positive for HCV antibodies were simultaneously tested for HCV RNA (Xpert HCV Viral Load, GeneXpert® IV, Cepheid, France) and HCVcAg (ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay, Abbott® Diagnostics) to confirm active HCV infection. An Abbott ARCHITECT® i1000SR Immunoassay Analyser was installed at a local district hospital as a point-of-care (POC) facility for HCVcAg testing, while samples for HCV RNA were tested in a central lab. Two hundred individuals (mean age 46.4 ± 14.5 years, 71.5% females), who screened positive for HCV antibody, were included in the study. HCV RNA was detected in 128 (64.0%) while HCVcAg was reactive in 119 (59.5%) cases. Performance of the Immunoassay Analyser was excellent with a higher throughput and quicker readout value compared to the GeneXpert System. The sensitivity and specificity of HCVcAg (≥10 fmol/L) at HCV RNA thresholds of ≥12 was 99.1% (95% CI: 95–100%) and 87.6% (95%CI: 78.4–94%). A strong agreement was observed between the HCVcAg assay and HCV RNA. The ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay showed high sensitivity and specificity compared to HCV RNA in a decentralized, resource-limited setting. It can therefore be used as a confirmatory test in HCV elimination programs, particularly for low-income countries such as Pakistan.

Architect HCV Ag assay is an efficient alternative tool to RNA qRT-PCR quantification for assessing viral load in HCV infection

Objective To evaluate the performance characteristics of the automated Architect hepatitis C virus (HCV) core Ag assay versus HCV RNA by PCR among Egyptian patients and to assess its use for valuable clinical workup. Background HCV diagnosis by conventional anti-HCV assays has high rate of false positivity, false negativity, and a limited sensitivity for detection. Although HCV RNA assays are a reliable method for HCV diagnosis, they need technical skills and may also have false-positive results because of contamination. Moreover, the test is time consuming and more expensive. In contrast, the HCV core antigen test detects circulating HCV core antigen and identifies individuals who are actively infected with HCV. A commercialized test (the Architect HCV core antigen test) is supposed to have a sensitivity to detect ∼0.06 pg/ml and consequently a significant increase in sensitivity over the previous assay and a stronger correlation with HCV RNA testing. Patients and methods A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 60 HCV antibody-positive patients attending the outpatient clinic of Tropical Medicine Department, Al-Hussein University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. The patients were classified into four groups based on the level of HCV viremia: group A included five patients with PCR below detection limit (12 IU/ml), group B included 39 patients with low viremia (<100 000 IU/ml), group C included 13 patients with moderate viremia (100 000–10 000 000 IU/ml), and group D included three patients with high viremia (>10 000 000 IU/ml). Each case was subjected to thorough clinical evaluation, HCV RNA quantification by Abbott Real Time HCV assay, and HCV Ag quantification by Architect HCV core antigen test. Results HCV Ag was found to be negative only in five of 55 HCV RNA-positive patients who had low level of viremia. The levels of HCV Ag showed a good correlation with those from the HCV RNA quantification (r=0.913, P≤0.001). Regarding HCV core antigen/HCV RNA ratio, it was not fixed for all patients. In most of them, each 1 pg/ml core Ag was equal to ∼10 000 IU/ml of RNA. Conclusion The Architect HCV Ag assay could be used as an alternative tool to HCV RNA PCR quantification in assessing viral load in HCV infection, and it has the advantages of lower cost, easy testing, and rapid reporting.

Hepatitis C virus core antigen for screening organ donors and recipients

Organ donors and recipients are routinely screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, typically via anti-HCV detection. We analyze the utility of an alternative HCV core antigen (HCV-Ag) quantification system, the ARCHITECT HCV Ag Assay, in this setting. We simultaneously tested 315 samples from potential organ donors and recipients using two chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays: ARCHITECT Anti-HCV and HCV Ag (Abbott, Germany). HCV-Ag was detected in 81 of the serum samples (25.71%) and anti-HCV in 87 (27.62%). Seventy-five of the HCV-Ag–positive samples were positive for anti-HCV (92.59%). Overall concordance between the two assays was 94.29%. Of the six HCV-Ag–positive/anti-HCV–negative patients, five had HCV-Ag values <32 fmol/L, and the sixth had a concentration of 477.50 fmol/L (viral load, 137,000 IU/mL). The HCV AG Assay detects HCV infections missed by the Anti-HCV Assay. Both markers should be used to screen for HCV infection in potential organ donors and recipients.

Hepatitis C Core Antigen Testing for Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires both a positive HCV antibody screen and confirmatory nucleic acid testing (NAT). Testing for hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCVcAg) is a potential alternative to NAT. To evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis of active HCV infection among adults and children for 5 HCVcAg tests compared with NAT. EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1990 through 31 March 2016. Case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, or randomized trials that compared any of 5 HCVcAg tests with an NAT reference standard. 2 independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using an adapted QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool. 44 studies evaluated 5 index tests. Studies for the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay had the highest quality, whereas those for the Ortho HCV Ag enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) had the lowest quality. From bivariate analyses, the sensitivity and specificity of the assays were as follows: Abbott ARCHITECT, 93.4% (95% CI, 90.1% to 96.4%) and 98.8% (CI, 97.4% to 99.5%); Ortho ELISA, 93.2% (CI, 81.6% to 97.7%) and 99.2% (CI, 87.9% to 100%); and Hunan Jynda Bioengineering Group HCV Ag ELISA, 59.5% (CI, 46.0% to 71.7%) and 82.9% (CI, 58.6% to 94.3%). Insufficient data were available for a meta-analysis about the Fujirebio Lumipulse Ortho HCV Ag and Eiken Lumispot HCV Ag assays. In 3 quantitative studies using Abbott ARCHITECT, HCVcAg correlated closely with HCV RNA levels greater than 3000 IU/mL. Insufficient data were available on covariates, such as HIV or hepatitis B virus status, for subgroup analyses. Few studies reported genotypes of isolates, and data for genotypes 4, 5, and 6 were scant. Most studies were conducted in high-resource settings and reference laboratories. The HCVcAg assays with signal amplification have high sensitivity, high specificity, and good correlation with HCV RNA levels greater than 3000 IU/mL and have the potential to replace NAT in settings with high HCV prevalence. National Institutes of Health.

Clinical Utility of a New Automated Hepatitis C Virus Core Antigen Assay for Prediction of Treatment Response in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCV Ag) is a recently developed marker of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We investigated the clinical utility of the new HCV Ag assay for prediction of treatment response in HCV infection. We analyzed serum from 92 patients with HCV infection who had been treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. HCV Ag levels were determined at baseline in all enrolled patients and at week 4 in 15 patients. Baseline HCV Ag levels showed good correlations with HCV RNA (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). Mean HCV Ag levels at baseline were significantly lower in patients with a sustained virologic response (SVR) than in those with a non SVR (relapse plus non responder) based on HCV RNA analysis (2.8 log10fmol/L vs. 3.27 log10fmol/L, P = 0.023). Monitoring of the viral kinetics by determination of HCV RNA and HCV Ag levels resulted in similarly shaped curves. Patients with undetectable HCV Ag levels at week 4 had a 92.3% probability of achieving SVR based on HCV RNA assay results. The HCV Ag assay may be used as a supplement for predicting treatment response in HCV infection, but not as an alternative to the HCV RNA assay.

Probable hepatitis C virus transmission from a seronegative blood donor via cellular blood products.

Probable hepatitis C virus transmission from a seronegative blood donor via cellular blood products.

Clinical utility of the ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay for early treatment monitoring in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection

BackgroundVirologic response-monitoring is essential for determining therapy duration in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This is usually performed using highly sensitive HCV-RNA assays. However, HCV-RNA assays are time-consuming, expensive and require highly trained personnel. Quantitative determination of HCV core-antigen (HCVAg) levels may be used to supplement treatment monitoring. ObjectivesThe clinical utility of the ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay (Abbott Diagnostics) for response-guided therapy was investigated. Study designWe analyzed serum from 160 patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had been treated with peg-interferon alfa-2b/ribavirin. HCVAg levels were determined at baseline, weeks 1, 2, 4 and 12. HCVAg levels were compared to those obtained with HCV-RNA assays: VERSANT HCV Quantitative 3.0 (bDNA) and Qualitative (TMA, both Siemens Healthcare) assay and the Abbott RealTime HCV assay (ART; Abbott Diagnostics). ResultsBaseline HCVAg levels correlated well with HCV-RNA as assessed by bDNA (r=0.91; p<0.0001) and ART (r=0.92; p<0.0001), respectively. Patients with undetectable HCVAg levels at week 1 had a 90.9% probability (positive predictive value) to achieve a rapid virologic response (HCV-RNA undetectable at week 4) based on TMA and 86.4% based on ART, respectively. Patients with less than 1log10 reduction in HCVAg between baseline and week 12 had a 90% probability (negative predictive value) to achieve a nonresponse (<2log10 decline in HCV-RNA between baseline and week 12) based on bDNA and 100% based on ART, respectively. ConclusionsDetermination of HCVAg may be useful for antiviral response-monitoring in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection.

Is Hepatitis C Virus Core Antigen an Adequate Marker for Community Screening?

A new hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (HCV Ag) assay was thought to have a good correlation with HCV RNA. The aim was to elucidate the usefulness of this HCV Ag assay in community screening. In a township where HCV is endemic, 405 residents aged 58 years or older responded to a follow-up community screening. All subjects were tested for anti-HCV (AxSYM, version 3.0; Abbott Diagnostics) and HCV Ag (Architect HCV Ag test; Abbott Diagnostics). For subjects with anti-HCV signal-to-cutoff ratios (S/CO) > 10 and/or HCV Ag > 3 fmol/liter, HCV RNA data (Taqman HCV RNA; Roche Diagnostics) were further checked. A total of 115 (28.4%) subjects had their serum HCV RNA levels measured, and 93 were HCV RNA positive. The other 290 subjects were supposed to be HCV RNA negative. HCV Ag was significantly correlated with HCV RNA according to the following equation: (log HCV RNA) = 2.08 + 1.03 (log HCV Ag) (R(2) = 0.94; P < 0.001). As determined using a combination of the values for anti-HCV (S/CO > 40) and HCV Ag (>3 fmol/liter) as a cutoff to predict viremia, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.8%, 100%, 99.3%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. In conclusion, for a community study, HCV Ag showed good correlation with HCV RNA. In addition, anti-HCV or HCV Ag can predict HCV viremia well, while a combination of anti-HCV (>40 S/CO) and HCV Ag (>3 fmol/liter) can provide the best result validity.

Evaluation of ARCHITECT HCV Core Antigen Assay

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) levels are known to be well correlating with HCV RNA levels, and may be used as an alternative marker of HCV replication for monitoring the response to HCV treatment. However, the low sensitivity of HCV core Ag assay has been an obstacle for clinical use. In this study, recently developed ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay (Abbott Laboratories, USA) was evaluated for analytical performance and clinical usefulness. A total of 109 sera from HCV infected patients including various genotypes of HCV (1b, 2, 2a/2c, 2b, and 3a) and 20 sera from healthy donors were used for evaluating the sensitivity, precision, and linearity of the HCV core Ag assay. The cross reactivity with HIV, hepatitis B virus and myeloma proteins (N=5, each) and correlation with HCV RNA PCR assay were also evaluated. The sensitivity of the HCV core Ag assay was 97.2% (106/109) and there were no false positive results and cross reactivity. The within-run, between-run and between-day CVs were 3.0%, 2.5% and 3.0%, respectively. The levels of HCV core antigen showed a good correlation with those of HCV RNA quantification (r=0.940). The HCV Ag assay showed an excellent linearity in the range from 0.63 to 17,114 fmol/L (r=0.999). The ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay was good in sensitivity, precision, and linearity and its results well correlated with HCV RNA levels. This assay could be used as a good marker of viral replication for monitoring the therapy response in chronically HCV infected patients.

New Automated Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Core Antigen Assay as an Alternative to Real-Time PCR for HCV RNA Quantification

An automated hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen (Ag) assay was evaluated with clinical samples. Determination of HCV Ag and RNA levels in 282 subjects using Abbott HCV Ag and Roche Cobas TaqMan assays revealed that these two tests were highly correlated (r = 0.9464). Thus, the HCV Ag assay could be an alternative test to quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

Simultaneous Detection of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Core Antigen and Anti-HCV Antibodies Improves the Early Detection of HCV Infection

To evaluate whether a new enzyme immunoassay developed for the simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) and anti-HCV antibodies (anti-HCV Ab) (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA; Bio-Rad) could improve the early detection of HCV infection, we compared its sensitivity to that of anti-HCV, HCV core Ag, and HCV RNA assays. The populations studied included 12 blood donor samples positive for HCV RNA and HCV core Ag but negative for anti-HCV antibodies and 23 hemodialysis patients who developed anti-HCV Ab (seroconversion) during the follow-up. From these 23 individuals, 83 samples sequentially collected prior to seroconversion and 108 samples collected after seroconversion were tested. Six of 12 blood donations were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab assay. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 24 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative by the HCV Ag/Ab assay and 23 of the 59 HCV RNA-positive samples (39%) were positive. The HCV Ag/Ab assay detected HCV infection on average 21.6 days before the most sensitive antibody assay. The HCV Ag/Ab assay did not detect HCV infection as early as the HCV RNA assay (mean delay, 30.3 days) or HCV Ag assay (mean delays, 27.9, and 16.3 days by the HCV core Ag quantification assay and the HCV Ag blood screening assay, respectively). This new assay provides a notable improvement for the early detection of HCV infection during the so-called window period compared with anti-HCV Ab assays and could be a useful alternative to HCV RNA detection or HCV core Ag assays for diagnosis or blood screening when nucleic acid technologies or HCV core Ag detection are not implemented.

NAT: Perspectives for Cellular Components

The introduction of routine testing to detect viral genomes in donated blood was originally driven by requirements for plasma fractionation in relation to exclusion of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA. Nevertheless, it was obvious from the outset that a dual standard for fractionated products and individual blood components would be untenable. In many countries therefore, planning for introduction of nucleic acid testing (NAT) of blood incorporated progression to release of HCV RNA tested components. HCV was singled out because of its long seronegative ‘window period’, relatively high prevalence and incidence in blood donors, rapid burst time and high genome copy number during seroconversion. The latter properties made HCV particularly suitable for detection in pools of samples. If HCV RNA testing is required for release of labile components such as platelets, rapid provision of NAT results is vital because of short shelf life of platelets and the problems of delays when resolving the infectious unit in a reactive pool. For NAT release of labile components smaller sample pool sizes allow faster resolution of RNA positive units. Smaller pools involve high test throughput, the likely need for more testing laboratories and ensuing increased costs. Single sample testing is the ultimate extrapolation of reducing sample pool size. With reduced pool sizes or single sample testing, the option of testing for other viruses (e.g. HIV or HBV) singly or in multiplex also arises. The cost–benefit and incremental yield of such strategies in the light of ‘combo’ assays for HIV Ag/Ab and the recently described HCV Ag assay will require careful and objective assessment, together with re-appraisal of anti-HBc screening for detection of HBV infected donors at the “tail-end” of carriage.