Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Research Articles

Tri-typing of hepatitis B-related acute-on-chronic liver failure defined by the World Gastroenterology Organization.

Tri-typing of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), as proposed by the World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO), has not been validated in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). We aim to compare the three types of ACLF patients in clinic characteristics. Hospitalized ACLF patients with chronic hepatitis B from five hepatology centers were retrospectively selected and grouped according to the WGO classification. For each group, we investigated laboratory tests, precipitating events, organ failure, and clinical outcome. Compared with type-B (n=262, compensated cirrhosis) and type-C (n=129, decompensated cirrhosis) ACLF, type-A patients (n=195, non-cirrhosis) were associated with a younger age, the highest platelet counts, the highest aminotransferase levels, and the most active HBV replications. HBV reactivation were more predominant in type-A, while bacterial infections in type-B and type-C ACLF cases. Liver failure (97.4%) and coagulation failure (86.7%) were most common in type-A compared with type-B or type-C ACLF patients. Kidney failure was predominantly identified in type-C subjects (41.9%) and was highest (23/38, 60.5%) in grade 1 ACLF patients. Furthermore, type-C ACLF showed the highest 28-day (65.2%) and 90-day (75.3%) mortalities, compared with type-A (48.7% and 54.4%, respectively) and type-B (48.4% and 62.8%, respectively) ACLF cases. Compared with type-A (11.7%) ACLF patients, the increased mortality from 28 to 90days was higher in type-B (31.6%) and type-C (37.5%). Tri-typing of HBV-related ACLF in accordance with the WGO definition was able to distinguish clinical characteristics, including precipitating events, organ failure, and short-term prognosis in ACLF patients.

Pregenomic HBV RNA and Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen Predict Outcomes in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Suppressed on Nucleos(T)ide Analogue Therapy.

A dichotomous separation of hepatitis B viral DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) concentrations occurs during the natural history and treatment of chronic hepatitis B. We have evaluated the ability of hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) as surrogates of silencing of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), to characterize this dissociation, and virological outcomes. Three cohorts of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients were studied: cohort A: 66 HBeAg-negative patients on long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy; cohort B: 23 antibodies against hepatitis B e antigen (anti-HBe)-positive patients who stopped treatment; and Cohort C: 19 anti-HBe-positive patients on long-term NA treatment who achieved HBsAg loss and in whom treatment was withdrawn. Concentrations of HBV serological/virological biomarkers (HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA) were measured in sequential samples at different time points on/off therapy. Cohort A: After 3years of antiviral therapy, 33% and 30% had detectable HBcrAg and HBV RNA, respectively, despite all being HBV-DNA negative. After 5years' therapy with NA, 27% and 14% had detectable HBcrAg and HBV RNA. Detectable HBcrAg and HBV RNA at the time of treatment withdrawal was only observed in those patients who developed a severe aminotransferase flare. Only those patients with HBV reactivation in cohort C had detectable HBV RNA at treatment withdrawal, but HBcrAg and HBV DNA were not detected. HBcrAg and HBV RNA are sensitive biomarkers of continued transcription of cccDNA in HBeAg-negative patients despite marked HBV-DNA suppression by NA. These markers were predictors of severe alanine transaminase flares, after treatment withdrawal, and HBV-DNA reactivation. Their measurement during the natural history of hepatitis B, and on treatment with current and new agents, could characterize residual HBV-RNA transcription from cccDNA and assist drug development and disease management.

Mitomycin, 5-fluorouracil, leflunomide, and mycophenolic acid directly promote hepatitis B virus replication and expression in vitro

BackgroundReactivation of hepatitis B virus is a common complication that occurs in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who have received cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. This clinical phenomenon not only occurs in overt HBV infection patients but also occurs in patients with resolved HBV infection. Previous research has confirmed that epirubicin and dexamethasone can stimulate HBV replication and expression directly rather than indirectly through immunosuppression. Mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil are currently used as cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs for cancer patients. Leflunomide and mycophenolic acid are regarded as immunosuppressants for autoimmune diseases, and numerous clinical studies have reported that these drugs can reactivate HBV replication. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether mitomycin, 5-fluorouracil, leflunomide and mycophenolic acid induce HBV reactivation directly rather than indirectly through immunosuppression.MethodsTo observe the effect of mitomycin, 5-fluorouracil, leflunomide and mycophenolic acid on HBV replication and expression, we employed HepG2.2.15 and HBV-NLuc-35 cells as a cell model. Next, by native agarose gel electrophoresis (NAGE), quantitative PCR (qPCR), luciferase assay and HBV e antigen (HBeAg) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) we detected changes in HBV replication and expression induced by these drugs. We also investigated whether lamivudine could inhibit the observed phenotype. SPSS 18.0 software was employed for statistical analysis, One-way ANOVA was used to compare multiple groups.ResultsExpression of HBV capsids and HBeAg in HepG2.2.15 cells was increased by increasing concentration of mitomycin, 5-fluorouracil, leflunomide, and mycophenolic acid. This phenomenon was also demonstrated in HBV-NLuc-35 cells, and the expression of capsids and luciferase activity increased in the same concentration-dependent manner. Replication levels of intracellular capsid DNA and extracellular HBV DNA in HepG2.2.15 cells gradually increased in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, although epirubicin, mitomycin, 5-fluorouracil, dexamethasone, leflunomide and mycophenolic acid enhanced HBV replication, lamivudine inhibited this process.ConclusionOur study confirmed that mitomycin, 5-fluorouracil, leflunomide and mycophenolic acid directly upregulated HBV replication and expression in vitro. This effect was investigated not only in HepG2.2.15 cells but also in the HBV-NLuc-35 replication system. Moreover, this effect could be prevented by nucleoside analogs, such as lamivudine (LAM). Thus, for patients with HBV infection, prophylactic antiviral therapy is necessary before receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy.

Perioperative antiviral therapy improves the prognosis of HBV DNA-negative patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the effect of perioperative antiviral therapy on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA-negative patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods The clinical data of 140 patients who were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) but negative for HBV DNA before partial hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate the influence of confounding factors on prognosis. Postoperative liver function, HBV reactivation rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between antiviral and non-antiviral therapy groups. Results Compared with the non-antiviral therapy group, the antiviral therapy group had a lower rate of HBV reactivation and better postoperative liver function (P < 0.05). The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates of the antiviral therapy group were better than those of the non-antiviral therapy group before or after PSM (P < 0.05). Prognostic analysis excluding 11 patients with HBV reactivation showed that perioperative antiviral therapy could significantly improve OS (P = 0.004), but had no significant effect on RFS (P = 0.056). Multivariate analyzes showed that antiviral therapy was associated with better OS. Conclusion Perioperative antiviral therapy can significantly reduce the risk of HBV reactivation and improve postoperative liver function, RFS and OS.

Low risk of HBV reactivation in a large European cohort of HCV/HBV coinfected patients treated with DAA

ABSTRACT Objectives The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence and clinical characteristics of HCV/HBV coinfection and to evaluate the rate of HBV-reactivation during anti-HCV therapy in a large real-world study. Methods Analyzed population consisted of 10,152 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with DAA between 2015 and 2019 in a nationwide study. Prior to the DAA all subjects had HBsAg and 60% anti-HBc testing. Results 111 of 10,152 patients (1.1%) had detectable HBsAg and 1239 of 6139 (20.2%) anti-HBcAb. The prevalence of occult hepatitis B was 0.48%. HCV/HBV patients were younger with a higher proportion of males, HIV-coinfected, and advanced fibrosis. They were less often diagnosed with diabetes but more often with chronic kidney disease. In HBsAg(+) subjects with baseline HBV-DNA available 6/102 (5.9%) HBV-reactivations during or after DAA therapy were observed, and in two (1.9%) significant hepatic flares were noted. In HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) group 2 (0.16%) reactivations were observed only in patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. Discussion Data from a large European cohort suggest a relatively low risk of HBV-reactivation during DAA-therapy for HCV infection in HBsAg(+) patients. In HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) HBV-reactivation seems to be limited to subjects with immunodeficiency. Importantly, previous exposure to HBV and occult hepatitis B is present in a significant proportion of HCV-infected.

Hepatitis B reactivation with pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and nivolumab: A pharmacovigilance study and literature review.

e15127 Background: Chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) impacts 257 million people worldwide. Chemo- and immunotherapies may predispose to HBV reactivation (HBVr), which can negatively impact oncologic outcomes. Programmed death (PD) and programmed death ligand (PDL)-1 inhibitors have been implicated in HBVr. The aim of this study is to report HBVr in patients who are treated with PD-1/PD L-1 inhibitors by utilizing the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) and literature review. Methods: This is a retrospective pharmacovigilance study using FAERS. We reviewed cases of HBVr reported in patients treated with pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and nivolumab from 2016-2019. Signal disproportionality analysis was conducted using a reporting odds ratio (ROR). A systematic review using Ovid MEDLINE(R) was conducted for additional reports of HBVr and associated outcomes. Results: There were 15 cases of HBVr associated with the use of PD1/PDL1 inhibitors on FAERS (ROR 1.2, 95% CI [0.72-1.99]). Only pembrolizumab was shown to a have significant association with HBVr (ROR 2.93, 95% CI [1.57-5.46]) (Table). Moreover, 7 cases of HBVr were reported in the literature, 3 with pembrolizumab and 4 with nivolumab. Median time to diagnosis following initiation of immunotherapy was 12 (5-24) weeks and 8 (3-10.5) weeks for resolution of HBVr. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab was the only agent with a significant association of HBVr. Future institutional studies in both endemic and nonendemic areas are warranted to determine the true incidence and necessity of pretreatment screening for HBV in patients on PD-1/PDL-1 therapy. [Table: see text]

Diminished hepatic IFN response following HCV clearance triggers HBV reactivation in coinfection.

In patients with HBV and HCV coinfection, HBV reactivation leading to severe hepatitis has been reported with the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to treat HCV infection. Here we studied the molecular mechanisms behind this viral interaction. In coinfected cell culture and humanized mice, HBV replication was suppressed by HCV coinfection. In vitro, HBV suppression was attenuated when interferon (IFN) signaling was blocked. In vivo, HBV viremia, after initial suppression by HCV superinfection, rebounded following HCV clearance by DAA treatment that was accompanied by a reduced hepatic IFN response. Using blood samples of coinfected patients, IFN-stimulated gene products including C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10), C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were identified to have predictive value for HBV reactivation after HCV clearance. Taken together, our data suggest that HBV reactivation is a result of diminished hepatic IFN response following HCV clearance and identify serologic markers that can predict HBV reactivation in DAA-treated HBV-HCV-coinfected persons.

When viruses collide: hepatitis B virus reactivation after hepatitis C treatment.

Treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection can result in HBV reactivation. In this issue of the JCI, Cheng and colleagues explored the role of interferon signaling in the complex interaction between HBV and HCV using cell lines, mouse models, and samples from people with coinfection. Notably, HCV enhanced interferon signaling, as measured by interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression, and decreased HBV transcription and replication. Blockade of interferon signaling reversed the effects on HBV replication. Further, pharmacologic inhibition of HCV replication in vitro and in coinfected humanized mice also reduced interferon signaling and, correspondingly, increased HBV replication. Intriguingly, baseline serum levels of the ISG CXCL10 predicted HBV reactivation in a cohort of coinfected people taking DAAs. Determining how interferon signaling silences HBV transcription and whether serum CXCL10 predicts HBV reactivation in a clinical setting are questions that warrant further investigation.

Hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: An old tale or a clear and present danger?

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has been described more than 50 years ago. Similarly, to other clinical conditions, in which impairment of host immune defense favors viral replication, early reports described in details recurrence and reactivation of HBV in liver transplant recipients. The evidence of a possible, severe, clinical evolution of HBV reappearance in a significant percentage of these patients, allowed to consider, for some years, HBV positivity a contraindication for LT. Moving from the old to the new millennium this picture has changed dramatically. Several studies contributed to establish efficient prophylactic protocols for HBV recurrence and with the advent of more potent anti-viral drugs an increased control of infection was achieved in transplanted patients as well as in the general immune-competent HBV population. Success obtained in the last decade led some authors to the conclusion that HBV is now to consider just as a “mere nuisance”. However, with regard to HBV and LT, outstanding issues are still on the table: (1) A standard HBV prophylaxis protocol after transplant has not yet been clearly defined; (2) The evidence of HBV resistant strains to the most potent antiviral agents is claiming for a new generation of drugs; and (3) The possibility of prophylaxis withdrawal in some patients has been demonstrated, but reliable methods for their selection are still lacking. The evolution of LT for HBV is examined in detail in this review together with the description of the strategies adopted to prevent HBV recurrence and their pros and cons.

Hepatitis B Reactivation in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis B Virus Core Antibody Positive Grafts: a Retrospective Study

Liver grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive donors increasethe risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in recipients due to posttransplant immunosuppressive therapy. to study the HBV reactivation in liver transplant recipients with anti-HBc-positive donors. This was a retrospective study. Liver transplant recipients who received grafts from anti-HBc-positive donors between January 2013 and December 2017 were included in analysis. Hospital records of all subjects for a 2-year posttransplantation period were studied to observe reactivation of hepatitis B. As per our institute protocol, prophylaxis for HBV was given to subjects with either positive hepatitis B surface antigens or hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titre <100 mIU/ml, after transplantation with anti-HBc-positive donor grafts. Recipients with anti-HBs titre >100 mIU/mL were exempted from prophylaxis and kept on regular monitoring for HBV markers. Of 85 liver transplant recipients, 20 subjects who received anti-HBc-positive grafts were included in analysis. The mean age of the study population was 46 years (range 2-68 years). The most common aetiology of cirrhosis in our study population was cryptogenic followed by ethanol. Among the study population, 16 (80%) transplant recipients had anti-HBs titre less than 100 mu/ml and 4 (20%) subjects had anti-HBs>100 miu/ml. HBV reactivation occurred in 6 (30%) subjects. Reactivation was seen even in those who received HBV prophylaxis, while none of the subjects with anti-HBs titre >100 miu/ml developed HBV reactivation despite absence of prophylaxis. HBV reactivation can occur even in the presence of target anti-HBs titre (i.e. >10 miu/ml) and HBV prophylaxis during postliver transplantation. However, HBV reactivation is not seen in recipients with anti-HBs titre of >100 miu/ml.

HEPATITIS B VIRUS AND RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is often found and associated with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IMIRDs), necessitating the modification of both antiviral and antirheumatic therapies. The review provides basic information about the structure of HBV, the course of chronic HBV infection, and the prevention of HBV reactivation in patients with IMIRDs who receive immunosuppressive therapy.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Children With Acquired Immunodeficiencies or Undergoing Immune Suppressive, Cytotoxic, or Biological Modifier Therapies.

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a known complication of immune-suppressive, cytotoxic, and biological modifier therapies in patients currently infected with HBV or who have had past exposure to HBV. Nowadays, newer and emerging forms of targeted biologic therapies are available for the management of rheumatologic conditions, malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologic conditions and solid-organ, bone marrow, or haematologic stem cell transplant but there is currently a lack of a systematic approach to the care of patients with or at risk of HBV reactivation. The Hepatology Committee of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) together with a working group of ESPGHAN members with clinical and research expertise in viral hepatitis developed an evidence-based position paper on reactivation of HBV infection in children identifying pertinent issues addressing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of this condition. Relevant clinical questions were formulated and agreed upon by all the members of the working group. Questions were answered and positions were based on evidence resulting from a systematic literature search on PubMed and Embase from their inception to July 1, 2019. A document was produced and the working group and ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee members voted on each recommendation, using a formal voting technique. A recommendation was accepted provided upon agreement by at least 75% of the working group members. This position paper provides a comprehensive update on the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of HBV reactivation in children.

Role of hepatitis B antibody in predicting reactivation of resolved hepatitis B virus infection in leukemia patients

Background & AimsQuantification of anti-HBs and anti-HBc predicts the risk of HBV reactivation (HBVr) in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab treatment. However, it remains unclear whether the quantification is predictive of HBVr in leukemia patients undergoing immunosuppression. Methodsand patients: Clinical and laboratory data of the leukemia patients with resolved HBV infection diagnosed between January 2013 and March 2018 were retrospectively collected. Data series of HBV seromarkers and HBV DNA levels before the patients receiving chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and during follow-up duration were analyzed. ResultsIn total, 533 leukemia patients with resolved HBV infection were included. The incidences of HBVr were 5.7% (25/441) and 2.2% (2/92) in patients receiving HSCT and chemotherapy, respectively. In patients receiving HSCT, acute lymphoid leukemia had a significantly higher incidence of HBVr than acute myeloid leukemia (8.9% vs 3.9%, P < 0.05). The incidence varied almost zero to 40% due to the differences in the profiles of HBV antibodies. High anti-HBs (cut-off of 79.2 IU/L) or low anti-HBc levels (cut-off of 4.475, S/CO) at baseline were associated with a low risk of HBVr. Anti-HBe status did not affect the incidence of HBVr. However, the cut-offs were only predictive of HBVr in the patients who had negative anti-HBe. ConclusionThe baseline profiles of HBV antibodies are predictive of the risk of HBVr in leukemia patients undergoing immunosuppression. However, seronegative anti-HBe is a prerequisite for using baseline anti-HBs and anti-HBc quantification to predict HBVr risk.

To Study the Prevalence of Occult HBV Infection &amp; Reactivation of HBV in Hematological Cancer Patients on &amp; Before Cancer Chemotherapy

To Study the Prevalence of Occult HBV Infection &amp; Reactivation of HBV in Hematological Cancer Patients on &amp; Before Cancer Chemotherapy

Case reports of latent HBV hepatitis in patients after neurosurgical treatment for hypothalamic and pituitary tumors

BackgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health problem worldwide. More than 2 billion people have been exposed to HBV, and about 257 million individuals are chronic carriers of HBV. HBV reactivation has been increasingly reported in HBV carriers who have undergone immunosuppression or chemotherapy, resulting in mortality. Treatment of hypothalamic/pituitary tumors in HBV carriers requires extensive care to avoid HBV reactivation as steroid therapy is required after surgery for hypothalamic/pituitary tumors.Case presentationThis retrospective review identified 5 patients, who were HBV carriers positive for hepatitis B surface antigen among 1352 patients with surgically treated hypothalamic/pituitary tumor in Kohnan Hospital between February 2007 and April 2017. Transsphenoidal surgery was performed with particular attention to prevent damage to the pituitary gland, with delicate manipulation to minimize postoperative steroid coverage. All patients received nucleot(s)ide analogue to control HBV-DNA levels before the surgery. As a result, all patients had a good clinical course. Blood examinations found a transient increase of liver enzymes and HBV-DNA levels in all patients, which started to decrease within 2 weeks after surgery. No specific treatment other than nucleot(s)ide analogues was needed to maintain liver function, and all patients returned to their previous activities including reinstatement.ConclusionInitiation of nucleot(s)ide analogues administration prior to the surgery for hypothalamic/pituitary tumors can be an effective strategy for preventing reactivation in HBV carriers. Appropriate screening of the patient’s HBV phase, optimal timing of nucleot(s)ide analogues -administration, and administration period of nucleot(s)ide analogues need to be established.

Ultra-high sensitivity HBsAg assay can diagnose HBV reactivation following rituximab-based therapy in patients with lymphoma

HBV reactivation is a risk in patients receiving anti-CD20 antibodies for the treatment of lymphoma. The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of an ultra-high sensitivity HBsAg assay to guide preemptive antiviral treatment in patients with lymphoma and resolved HBVinfectionsusing prospectively stored samples from an HBV DNA monitoring study. HBV reactivation (defined as HBV DNA levels of ≥11IU/ml) was confirmed in 22 of 252 patients. A conventional HBsAg assay (ARCHITECT, cut-off value: 0.05 IU/ml) and an ultra-high sensitivity HBsAg assay employing a semi-automated immune complex transfer chemiluminescence enzyme technique (ICT-CLEIA, cut-off value: 0.0005 IU/ml) were performed at baseline, at confirmed HBV reactivation and monitored after HBV reactivation. Baseline HBsAg was detected using ICT-CLEIA in 4 patients; in all of whom precore mutants with high replication capacity were reactivated. Of the 6 patients with HBV DNA detected below the level of quantification at baseline, 5 showed HBV reactivation and 3 of the 5 had precore mutations. Sensitivity for detection by ARCHITECT and ICT-CLEIA HBsAg assays at HBV reactivation or the next sampling after HBV reactivation was 18.2% (4 of 22) and 77.3% (17 of 22), respectively. Of the 5 patients undetectable by ICT-CLEIA, HBV reactivation resolved spontaneously in 2 patients. All 6 patients reactivated with precore mutations including preS deletion could be diagnosed by ICT-CLEIA HBsAg assay at an early stage of HBV reactivation. Multivariate analysis showed that an anti-HBs titer of less than 10 mIU/ml, HBV DNA detected but below the level of quantification, and HBsAg detected by ICT-CLEIA at baseline were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation (adjusted hazard ratios, 15.4, 31.2 and 8.7, respectively; p <0.05). A novel ICT-CLEIA HBsAg assay is an alternative method to diagnose HBV reactivation. UMIN000001299. Hepatitis B virus can be reactivated in lymphoma patients receiving anti-CD20 antibodies such as rituximab. Currently, reactivation requires the monitoring of HBV DNA, but monitoring of the surface antigen (HBsAg) could provide a relatively inexpensive, quick and easy alternative. We assessed the performance of an ultra-high sensitivity HBsAg assay and showed that it could be effective for the diagnosis and monitoring of HBV reactivation.

Prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with hematological malignancies and resolved hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients with resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are at risk of HBV reactivation during treatment for hematological malignancies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the data on the efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis for the prevention of HBV reactivation in this group of patients. We conducted a systemic literature search of PubMed including MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to 31 January 2019 to identify studies published in English comparing antiviral prophylaxis with no prophylaxis for HBV reactivation in patients treated for hematological malignancies. The search terms used were ("occult hepatitis B" OR "resolved hepatitis B") AND ("reactivation") AND ("haematological malignancy" OR "hematological malignancy" OR "chemotherapy" OR "immunotherapy" OR "chemoimmunotherapy" OR "lymphoma" OR "leukemia" OR "transplant"). The primary outcome was the reactivation of HBV infection. Pooled estimates of relative risk (RR) were calculated. We identified 13 relevant studies including two randomized controlled trials (RCT), one post hoc analysis from RCT and 10 cohort studies. There was a trend towards a lower rate of HBV reactivation using antiviral prophylaxis, but the difference was not significant (RR 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-1.40, P = 0.22). When limiting the analysis to the three prospective studies of patients receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, we found antiviral prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.49, P = 0.001). Antiviral prophylaxis reduced the risk of HBV reactivation in patients receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for hematological malignancies but not in a broader group of patients receiving anticancer therapy.

Hepatitis B reactivation after kidney transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative, core antibody-positive recipients.

Nowadays, intensive immunosuppressive therapy including rituximab is commonly used prior to kidney transplantation (KT), raising concerns over hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and anti-hepatitis B core (HBc)-positive KT recipients. Recent practice guidelines suggested watchful monitoring or antiviral prophylaxis for the first 6-12months, the period of maximal immunosuppression. However, the actual risk for HBV reactivation, and whether short-term antiviral therapy in the early period is necessary, remains unclear. A total of 449 HBsAg-negative and anti-HBc-positive KT recipients were analysed for HBV reactivation. During a median follow-up of 6.7 (interquartile range: 4.2-9.4) years, HBV reactivation was observed in 9 patients (2.0%). The median time of HBV reactivation from KT was 2.8years (range: 1.4-11.5years), with cumulative incidence rates of 0%, 1% and 2% for 1, 3 and 5years, respectively. There were no severe adverse outcomes, including liver transplantation or mortality related to HBV reactivation. The risk of HBV reactivation was not high, even in anti-HBs-negative patients (n=60, 4% at 5years), ABO mismatch (n=92, 4% at 5years), use of rituximab (n=66, 3% at 5years) or plasmapheresis (n=17, 7% at 5years), and acute rejection (n=169, 3% at 5years). In conclusion, the HBV reactivation risk was not high and the time of detection was not clustered in the early post-KT period. Our findings favour continued watchful monitoring over antiviral prophylaxis in the early period.

Where Is the Genesis of Pancreatic Cancer? What is the Cause &amp; Is There a Cure?

We present a case of hepatitis B reactivation in a patient receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. This is a 49-year-old post-menopausal, Chinese female with history of chronic hepatitis B with inactive carrier state, and right invasive ductal carcinoma staged as cT2N1M0, pT2N1aM0, anatomic stage IIB, prognostic stage IIA, estrogen and progesterone receptor positive, and human epidermal growth factor 2 negative. The patient underwent bilateral mastectomy with implant reconstruction and right axillary lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy planned as dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC), followed by dose dense paclitaxel (ddT). Two weeks after her first cycle of dose dense paclitaxel, she developed grade III HBV reactivation with hepatitis. This report highlights HBV reactivation as a potential complication of chemotherapy for solid tumors, and reviews recommended HBV screening, prevention and management of HBV reactivation in this patient population.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection

ObjectivesThe safety and efficacy of immunotherapy among patients with history of hepatitis B (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear as this population has traditionally been excluded from clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated treatment toxicities and clinical outcomes in nineteen patients with NSCLC and history of past or chronic HBV (16 cases, two of these had HCV co-infection) or chronic HCV infection (five cases), who received a programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitor. ResultsThe overall response rate to immunotherapy was 35 %, and the median progression-free survival was 4.5 months. After ICI initiation, increases in liver function tests (LFTs) from baseline were infrequent and mild, and no patients experienced grade 3 or 4 hepatic immune-related adverse events or required ICI discontinuation or corticosteroid administration for management of hepatic toxicity. There were no significant changes in viral load or cases of HBV reactivation or HCV flare while on ICI therapy. ConclusionIn this case series, treatment with immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC and past or chronic viral hepatitis appears to be safe, and responses to ICIs can be durable in this population. Additional studies are needed in larger cohorts of patients to determine the safety of immunotherapy in patients with chronic viral infections.