Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Measurement Research Articles

The independent prognostic value of perioperative hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in patients with portal hypertension who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy plus esophagogastric devascularization

BackgroundHepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing portal hypertension (PHT). Laparoscopic splenectomy plus esophagogastric devascularization (LSED) is an important surgery for treating PHT. However, the variation trend of HVPG after surgery is not clear. Moreover, whether HVPG can provide precise prognostic information for patients undergoing surgery remains to be further studied. This study aimed to investigate the independent prognostic value of HVPG in LSED.MethodsFrom January 2016 to March 2023, 135 patients with PHT underwent LSED at our hospital were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed the correlations between clinical indicators and history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Among them, 57 patients remeasured postoperative HVPG. We further investigated the postoperative alterations of HVPG and correlative factors, as well as the relationship between the HVPG and postoperative UGIB.ResultsIn this study, we found that 94 patients with preoperative UGIB (16.27 ± 5.73 mmHg) had a higher baseline HVPG than the other 41 patients without (14.02 ± 5.90 mmHg) (p = 0.04). The mean postoperative HVPG significantly decreased (-3.57 ± 8.09 mmHg, p = 0.001) compared to the baseline, and 66% of patients (38/57) experienced a decreased HVPG-response after surgery. The baseline HVPG and preoperative CTP class B were associated with the decreased HVPG-response (p<0.05). Additionally, patients with postoperative HVPG decreased>20% from baseline exhibited better recurrent hemorrhage-free survival rates than those without (log-rank, p = 0.013).ConclusionWe found that LSED led to a significantly decreased HVPG, and patients with postoperative HVPG decreased >20% obtained better UGIB-free survival benefits than those without.

Predictive value of hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis development

Background & AimsThere are lots of risk factors reported for cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) development, however, the relationship between hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and PVT development remains unclear. MethodsThe clinical outcomes of cirrhotic patients who had no PVT and underwent HVPG measurement at baseline between March 2018 and March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Screening for non-tumoral PVT development was implemented by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging every 6-12 months. ResultsEighty-two cirrhotic patients were evaluated over a follow-up period. Of these, 12 patients (14.6%) experienced the development of PVT. The occurrence of non-tumoral PVT at one, two, and three years were 6.6%, 11.7%, and 22.2% respectively. HVPG (p=0.038;HR 1.07;95%CI 1.00-1.14) and alcohol liver disease (ALD) (p=0.019;HR 4.20;95%CI 1.27-13.89) were independently associated with a high PVT risk. The cutoff value of HVPG was 17.52 mmHg. The cumulative incidence of PVT differed significantly among groups stratified by HVPG thresholds of 16mmHg (P=0.011). The sensitivity and specificity of HVPG≥16mmHg in predicting PVT development were 100.0% and 35.7%. ConclusionsIn patients with liver cirrhosis, the value of HVPG was the independent predictive factor of PVT development. Screening for PVT was recommended during follow-up in patients with HVPG≥16 mmHg.

Aetiology-specific inflammation patterns in patients and rat models of compensated cirrhosis

BackgroundCirrhosis is associated with a proinflammatory environment. AimsTo analyse aetiology-specific inflammation patterns in compensated cirrhosis in animal models and patients. MethodsPortal pressure (PP), fibrosis (collagen proportionate area [CPA]) and hepatic inflammation were measured in cirrhotic rat models (thioacetamide [TAA;n = 12]; choline-deficient high-fat diet [CDHFD;n = 12]; bile duct ligation [BDL;n = 16]). Compensated cirrhotic patients (alcohol-related liver disease [ALD;n = 67]; metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis [MASH;n = 50]; cholestatic liver disease [primary biliary cholangitis [PBC]/primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC];n = 22]) undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement were included. ResultsIn rats, hepatic proinflammatory gene expression was highest in CDHFD and lowest in TAA, despite comparable PP levels. Across all animal models, Tnfa/Il6 correlated positively with CPA, and Mcp1 with elevated PP. Mcp1 was also associated with increased CPA in TAA/CDHFD. Mcp1/Cxcl1 showed a model-independent positive correlation to transaminases. Il1b correlated positively with CPA/PP in BDL and with transaminases in CDHFD. In patients, CRP/IL-6 were lower in MASH compared to ALD or PBC/PSC, regardless of hepatic function. IgA/IgG were highest and complement factors lowest in ALD. More pronounced systemic inflammation was linked to higher HVPG primarily in ALD/MASH. ConclusionProinflammatory pathways are upregulated across all liver disease aetiologies, yet their association with fibrosis and portal hypertension can vary.

Advanced cystic fibrosis liver disease: Endovascular, endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical considerations.

Up to 90% of people with CF (pwCF) will have some form of hepatobiliary involvement. This manuscript aims to explore the different endovascular, endoscopic, radiological and surgical procedures available to diagnose and manage the most severe form of CF hepatobiliary involvement (CFHBI) known as advanced cystic fibrosis liver disease (aCFLD),seen in 10% of pwCF. These procedures and interventions include liver biopsy, hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement, gastrostomy tube placement to optimize nutrition, paracentesis, endoscopic variceal control of bleeding and portosystemic shunting before liver transplantation. By utilizing advanced diagnostic or surgical techniques, healthcare professionals of pwCF can more effectively manage patients with CFHBI and aCFLD and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Prevalence and prognostic value of zinc and selenium deficiency in advanced chronic liver disease.

Zinc and selenium are essential trace elements involved in important (patho)physiological processes. The prevalence and prognostic implications of zinc and selenium deficiency in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) remain unknown. We determined serum zinc and selenium concentrations in 309 patients with ACLD undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement between 2019 and 2022. We evaluated the prevalence of zinc/selenium deficiency and assessed its association with severity of ACLD and liver-related events (LRE, i.e. first/further hepatic decompensation/liver-related death). Among 309 ACLD patients (median: age: 57 [IQR: 50-64], MELD: 11 [IQR: 9-16], HVPG: 17 [IQR: 11-20]), 73% (227) and 63% (195) were deficient in zinc and selenium, respectively. Decompensated (dACLD) patients showed significantly lower serum zinc (median: 48 [IQR: 38-59] vs. compensated, cACLD: 65 [IQR: 54-78], p < 0.001) and selenium levels (median: 4.9 [IQR 4.0-6.2] vs. cACLD: 6.1 [IQR 5.1-7.3], p < 0.001). Significant correlations of zinc/selenium levels were found with MELD (zinc: ρ = -0.498, p < 0.001; selenium: ρ = -0.295, p < 0.001), HVPG (zinc: ρ = -0.400, p < 0.001; selenium: ρ = -0.157, p = 0.006) and liver disease-driving mechanisms (IL6, bile-acid homeostasis). On multivariable analysis, low zinc/selenium levels, age and MELD remained independently associated with LRE. Zinc and selenium deficiencies are common in ACLD patients especially with higher MELD and HVPG. Low zinc and selenium levels independently predicted hepatic decompensation and liver-related death. The effect of zinc/selenium supplementation in ACLD should be investigated in future trials.

The Balloon Catheter Method and the End-hole Catheter Method in the Measurement of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient: a Comparative Study.

This study aims to evaluate the differences between The balloon catheter method and End-hole Catheter Method in measuring hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) among cirrhosis patients. From October 2017 to January 2024, patients who underwent HVPG measurements using both methods were consecutively included. HVPGs obtained from both methods were compared with the portal vein pressure gradient (PPG) obtained via transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using paired comparisons. Additionally, the consistency and predictive ability for bleeding risk of the two methods, as well as the impact of intrahepatic veno-venous shunt (IHVS), were analyzed. The study enrolled 145 patients, each of whom had HVPG measured by both methods. PPG was measured in 61 patients. There was a statistically significant difference between the PPGs and HVPGs measured by both the balloon catheter method and the end-hole catheter method (P < 0.001), with the HVPG mean values obtained by the end-hole catheter method being closer to the PPGs. In the non-IHVS group, no significant statistical difference was found between the two methods (P = 0.071). In contrast, the IHVS group showed a significant difference (P < 0.001), with a mean difference of 2.98 ± 4.03mmHg. When IHVS was absent, the measurement results from the end-hole catheter method and the balloon catheter method were found to be highly correlated. The end-hole catheter method has a higher screening capability for patients at risk of bleeding compared to the balloon catheter method (75.90% vs. 72.86%). HVPG measurements using either the balloon catheter method or end-hole catheter method showed significant difference with the PPG. The end-hole catheter method has a higher screening capability for patients at risk of bleeding, and IHVS could lead to lower HVPG measurements with The balloon catheter method.

Carvedilol to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension stratified by liver stiffness: study protocol for a randomied, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial in China

IntroductionPatients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are recommended to be treated with non-selective beta-blockers (ie, carvedilol) to prevent the first hepatic decompensation event by the renewing Baveno VII consensus....

Metabolomics reveals altered metabolites in cirrhotic patients with severe portal hypertension in Tibetan population.

Portal hypertension (PHT) presents a challenging issue of liver cirrhosis. This study aims to identify novel biomarkers for severe PHT (SPHT) and explore the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying PHT progression. Twenty-three Tibetan cirrhotic patients who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement were included. Eleven patients had an HVPG between 5 mmHg and 15 mmHg (MPHT), while 12 had an HVPG ≥16 mmHg (SPHT). Peripheral sera were analyzed using liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer for metabolomic assessment. An additional 14 patients were recruited for validation of metabolites. Seven hundred forty-five metabolites were detected and significant differences in metabolomics between MPHT and SPHT patients were observed. Employing a threshold of p < 0.05 and a variable importance in projection score >1, 153 differential metabolites were identified. A significant number of these metabolites were lipids and lipid-like molecules. Pisumionoside and N-decanoylglycine (N-DG) exhibited the highest area under the curve (AUC) values (0.947 and 0.9091, respectively). Additional differential metabolites with AUC >0.8 included 6-(4-ethyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid, sphinganine 1-phosphate, 4-hydroxytriazolam, 4,5-dihydroorotic acid, 6-hydroxy-1H-indole-3-acetamide, 7alpha-(thiomethyl)spironolactone, 6-deoxohomodolichosterone, glutaminylisoleucine, taurocholic acid 3-sulfate, and Phe Ser. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay further confirmed elevated levels of sphinganine 1-phosphate, N-DG, and serotonin in SPHT patients. Significant disruptions in linoleic acid, amino acid, sphingolipid metabolisms, and the citrate cycle were observed in SPHT patients. Pisumionoside and N-DG are identified as promising biomarkers for SPHT. The progression of PHT may be associated with disturbances in lipid, linoleic acid, and amino acid metabolisms, as well as alterations in the citrate cycle.

Histologic Findings of Sinusoidal Dilatation and Congestion in Liver Grafts Do Not Correlate with Hepatic Venous Anastomotic Gradients.

Hepatic venous transplant anastomotic pressure gradient measurement and transjugular liver biopsy are commonly used in clinical decision-making in patients with suspected anastomotic hepatic venous outflow obstruction. This investigation aimed to determine if sinusoidal dilatation and congestion on histology are predictive of hepatic venous anastomotic outflow obstruction, and if it can help select patients for hepatic vein anastomosis stenting. This is a single-center retrospective study of 166 transjugular liver biopsies in 139 patients obtained concurrently with transplant venous anastomotic pressure gradient measurement. Demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, procedure and clinical data, and histology of time-zero allograft biopsies were analyzed. No relationship was found between transplant venous anastomotic pressure gradient and sinusoidal dilatation and congestion (P = 0.92). Logistic regression analysis for sinusoidal dilatation and congestion confirmed a significant relationship with reperfusion/preservation injury and/or necrosis of the allograft at time-zero biopsy (OR 6.6 [1.3-33.1], P = 0.02). There is no relationship between histologic sinusoidal dilatation and congestion and liver transplant hepatic vein anastomotic gradient. In this study group, sinusoidal dilatation and congestion is a nonspecific histopathologic finding that is not a reliable criterion to select patients for venous anastomosis stenting.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts risk of hepatic decompensation and liver-related mortality in patients with MASLD

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a leading cause of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). Portal hypertension drives hepatic decompensation and is best diagnosed by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. Here, we investigate the prognostic value of HVPG in MASLD-related compensated ACLD (MASLD-cACLD). This European multicentre study included patients with MASLD-cACLD characterised by HVPG at baseline. Hepatic decompensation (variceal bleeding/ascites/hepatic encephalopathy) and liver-related mortality were considered the primary events of interest. A total of 340 patients with MASLD-cACLD (56.2% male; median age 62 [55-68] years, median MELD 8 [7-9], 71.2% with diabetes) were included. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH: i.e., HVPG ≥10mmHg) was found in 209 patients (61.5%). During a median follow-up of 41.5 (27.5-65.8) months, 65 patients developed hepatic decompensation with a cumulative incidence of 10.0% after 2 years (2Y) and 30.7% after 5 years (5Y) in those with MASLD-cACLD with CSPH, compared to 2.4% after 2Y and 9.4% after 5Y in patients without CSPH. Variceal bleeding did not occur without CSPH. CSPH (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 5.13; p <0.001) was associated with an increased decompensation risk and a higher HVPG remained an independent risk factor in the multivariable model (adjusted SHR per mmHg: 1.12, p <0.001). Liver-related mortality occurred in 37 patients at a cumulative incidence of 3.3% after 2Y and 21.4% after 5Y in CSPH. Without CSPH, the incidence after 5Y was 0.8%. Accordingly, a higher HVPG was also independently associated with a higher risk of liver-related death (adjusted SHR per mmHg: 1.20, p <0.001). HVPG measurement is of high prognostic value in MASLD-cACLD. In patients with MASLD-cACLD without CSPH, the short-term risk of decompensation is very low and liver-related mortality is rare, while the presence of CSPH substantially increases the risk of both. While the incidence of compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasing worldwide, insights into the impact of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) on the risk of liver-related events in MASLD-cACLD remain limited. Based on the findings of this European multicentre study including 340 MASLD-cACLD patients, we could show that increasing HVPG values and the presence of CSPH in particular were associated with a significantly higher risk of first hepatic decompensation and liver-related mortality. In contrast, the short-term incidence of decompensation in patients with MASLD-cACLD without CSPH was low and the risk of liver-mortality remained negligible. Thus, HVPG measurements can provide important prognostic information for individualised risk stratification in MASLD-cACLD and may help facilitate the study of novel and promising treatment possibilities for MASLD.

Predicting response to non-selective beta-blockers with liver-spleen stiffness and heart rate in patients with liver cirrhosis and high-risk varices.

Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) are used for primary prophylaxis in patients with liver cirrhosis and high-risk varices (HRVs). Assessing therapeutic response is challenging due to the invasive nature of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. This study aims to define anoninvasive machine-learning basedapproach to determine response to NSBB in patients with liver cirrhosis and HRVs. We conducted a prospective study on a cohort of cirrhotic patients with documented HRVs receiving NSBB treatment. Patients were followed-up with clinical and elastography appointments at 3, 6, and 12months after NSBB treatment initiation. NSBB response was defined as stationary or downstaging variceal grading at the 12-month esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). In contrast, non-response was defined as upstaging variceal grading at the 12-month EGD or at least one variceal hemorrhage episode during the 12-month follow-up. We chose cut-off values for univariate and multivariate model with 100% specificity. According to least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) percentual decrease, along with changes in heart rate (HR) at 3months were the most significant predictors of NSBB response. A decrease > 11.5% in SS, > 16.8% in LS, and > 25.3% in HR was associated with better prediction of clinical response to NSBB. SS percentual decrease showed the highest accuracy (86.4%) with high sensitivity (78.8%) when compared to LS and HR. The multivariate model incorporating SS, LS, and HR showed the highest discrimination and calibration metrics (AUROC = 0.96), with the optimal cut-off of 0.90 (sensitivity 94.2%, specificity 100%, PPV 95.7%, NPV 100%, accuracy 97.5%).

Serum proteomic profiling of patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease with and without clinically significant portal hypertension.

Portal hypertension (PH) drives the progression of liver cirrhosis to decompensation and death. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is the standard of PH quantification, and HVPG≥10 mmHg defines clinically significant PH (CSPH). We performed proteomics-based serum profiling to search for a proteomic signature of CSPH in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Consecutive patients with histologically confirmed cACLD and results of HVPG measurements were prospectively included. Serum samples were pooled according to the presence/absence of CSPH and analysed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed, followed by comprehensive literature review for proteins identified with the most striking difference between the groups. We included 48 patients (30 with, and 18 without CSPH). Protein CD44, involved in the inflammatory response, vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) and lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1), both involved in lymphangiogenesis were found solely in the CSPH group. Although identified in both groups, proteins involved in neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation, as well as tenascin C, autotaxin and nephronectin which mediate vascular contractility and lymphangiogenesis were more abundant in CSPH. We propose that altered inflammatory response, including NET formation, vascular contractility and formation of new lymph vessels are key steps in PH development. Proteins such as CD44, VEGF-C, LYVE-1, tenascin C, Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, Nephronectin, Bactericidal permeability-increasing protein, Autotaxin, Myeloperoxidase and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-like protein 4 might be considered for further validation as potential therapeutic targets and candidate biomarkers of CSPH in cACLD.

The clinical value of the hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients undergoing hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with or without liver cirrhosis.

The role of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement in risk stratification before liver resection is an ongoing area of debate. This study examines the impact of preoperative HVPG levels on overall survival (OS)/time to recurrence (TTR) and postoperative complications after hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thirty-eight HCC patients undergoing HVPG measurement before liver resection at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between January 2014 and April 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Statistical analysis comprised univariable/multivariable Cox/logistic regression to identify risk factors of reduced OS/TTR or 90-day post-resection complications and Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank, chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U test, or Student's t-test for survival/subgroup analysis. The median HPVG was 6 (range: 0-14) mmHg. The HVPG was an independent risk factor for poorer TTR in the overall cohort (cut-off: ≥7.5 mmHg (17.18/43.81 months; P = 0.009)). In the subgroup analysis of cirrhotic patients (N = 29 (76%)), HVPG was additionally an independent risk factor for lower OS (cut-off: ≥8.5 mmHg [44.39/76.84 months; P = 0.012]). The HVPG had no impact on OS/TTR in non-cirrhotic patients (N = 9 (24%)), nor was it associated with postoperative complications in any cohort. In conclusion, preoperative HVPG levels are useful predictors for TTR and OS in cirrhotic HCC patients undergoing hepatic resection.

CT perfusion imaging of the liver and the spleen can identify severe portal hypertension.

To determine if hepatic and splenic perfusion parameters are useful in identifying severe portal hypertension (SPH). The study enrolled 52 patients who underwent perfusion CT scan within one week before the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. A commercial software package was used for post-processing to generate hepatic and splenic perfusion parameters. Correlations were assessed using Pearson and Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Logistic regression was used to screen predictive parameters of SPH. The cut-off values of parameters for severe portal hypertension were calculated, as well as the sensitivity and specificity. There was a significant difference between SPH and non-severe portal hypertension (NSPH) in blood volume of liver (BVLiver), hepatic arterial fraction (HAF), hepatic arterial perfusion (HAP), portal venous perfusion (PVP), mean slope of increase in spleen (MSISpleen), BVSpleen, blood flow of spleen (BFSpleen), BVSpleen/Liver, and BVSpleen/Liver(P) (p < 0.05). The Spearman correlation coefficient was - 0.541 (p < 0.001) between BVSpleen/Live and HVPG and - 0.568 (p < 0.001) between BVSpleen/Liver(P) and HVPG. Using a BVSpleen/Liver value of 0.780 or BVSpleen/Liver(P) value of 1.061 as the cut-off value for the detection of SPH, the sensitivity and specificity were 94.7% and 72.7%, 100%, and 63.6% respectively. There was a moderate correlation between CT perfusion parameters BVSpleen/Liver, BVSpleen/Liver(P), and HVPG, which may be used to detect severe portal hypertension.

One‐year status of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement from 85 hospitals in China

AbstractAimsSurveys and research on the applications of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) are important for understanding the current status and future development of this technology in China. This article aimed to investigate the status of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement in China in 2022.MethodsWe investigated the overall status of HVPG technology in China—including hospital distribution, hospital level, annual number of cases, catheters used, average cost, indications, and current challenges by using online questionnaire. By counting the number and percentages of cases of these results, we hope to clarify the current status of HVPG measurements in China.ResultsAccording to the survey, 85 hospitals in China used HVPG technology in 2022 distributed across 29 provinces. A total of 4989 HVPG measurements were performed in all of the surveyed hospitals in 2022, of which 2813 cases (56.4%) were measured alone. The average cost of HVPG measurement was 5646.8 ± 2327.9 CNY. Of the clinical teams who performed the measurements (sometimes multiple per hospital), 94.3% (82/87) used the balloon method, and the majority of the teams (72.4%, 63/87) used embolectomy catheters.ConclusionsThis survey clarified the clinical application status of HVPG in China and confirmed that some medical institutions in China have established a foundation for this technology. It is still necessary to continue promoting and popularizing this technology in the future.

A283 HETEROGENEITY OF TREATMENT RESPONSE TO BETA-BLOCKERS IN THE TREATMENT OF PORTAL HYPERTENSION RELATED TO CIRRHOSIS

Abstract Background Non-selective beta-blockers (BB) improve clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. However, it has been suggested that only a proportion of patients treated with BB benefit from them. Indeed, patients who achieve a ampersand:003E20% reduction in Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) with BB have an excellent prognosis, but only 30-50% achieve such response. This has been suggested as a reason for not using BB where no HVPG measurements are available. Aims In this study we aimed to quantify how heterogeneous is the response to BB in patients with cirrhosis, by analyzing trials in which the effects of BB on HVPG were compared with those of placebo. Methods For assessing the potential heterogeneity of treatment response to BB we conducted a meta-analysis of differences in variance between trial arms. The degree of heterogeneity of HVPG response to BB was quantified with the pooled variability ratio (VR) (SD of the HVPG at the end of the trial in the BB group divided by that in the placebo group). Results Our systematic search yielded 18 studies. Figure 1 shows a forest plot with the meta-analysis of the variability ratios (VR) in final HVPG. Pooled VR was 0.99 (95% CI 0.87-1.14). This indicates that there was no evidence for a higher average variability in the final HVPG in the beta-blocker treatment groups as compared to placebo groups, and hence there was no evidence to support that patients with cirrhosis exhibit a heterogeneous response to beta-blockers (i.e. there is no evidence to support that some patients responded to beta-blockers and others did not). Conclusions In conclusion, the analysis of RCTs comparing the HVPG response of beta-blockers with placebo in patients with cirrhosis does not suggest a heterogeneous hemodynamic response to beta-blockers. This, together with the fact that in most RCTs demonstrating the clinical benefits of beta-blockers treatment was not adjusted based on HVPG response, further supports the concept that there is no need to perform portal pressure measurements to guide treatment with beta-blockers. Funding Agencies None

FXR-FGF19 signaling in the gut–liver axis is dysregulated in patients with cirrhosis and correlates with impaired intestinal defence

Background and aimsExperimental studies linked dysfunctional Farnesoid X receptor (FXR)-fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) signaling to liver disease. This study investigated key intersections of the FXR-FGF19 pathway along the gut–liver axis and their link to disease severity in patients with cirrhosis.MethodsPatients with cirrhosis undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (cohort-I n = 107, including n = 53 with concomitant liver biopsy; n = 5 healthy controls) or colonoscopy with ileum biopsy (cohort-II n = 37; n = 6 controls) were included. Hepatic and intestinal gene expression reflecting FXR activation and intestinal barrier integrity was assessed. Systemic bile acid (BA) and FGF19 levels were measured.ResultsSystemic BA and FGF19 levels correlated significantly (r = 0.461; p < 0.001) and increased with cirrhosis severity. Hepatic SHP expression decreased in patients with cirrhosis (vs. controls; p < 0.001), indicating reduced FXR activation in the liver. Systemic FGF19 (r = −0.512, p < 0.001) and BA (r = −0.487, p < 0.001) levels correlated negatively with hepatic CYP7A1, but not SHP or CYP8B1 expression, suggesting impaired feedback signaling in the liver. In the ileum, expression of FXR, SHP and FGF19 decreased in patients with cirrhosis, and interestingly, intestinal FGF19 expression was not linked to systemic FGF19 levels. Intestinal zonula occludens-1, occludin, and alpha-5-defensin expression in the ileum correlated with SHP and decreased in patients with decompensated cirrhosis as compared to controls.ConclusionsFXR-FGF19 signaling is dysregulated at essential molecular intersections along the gut–liver axis in patients with cirrhosis. Decreased FXR activation in the ileum mucosa was linked to reduced expression of intestinal barrier proteins. These human data call for further mechanistic research on interventions targeting the FXR-FGF19 pathway in patients with cirrhosis.Clinical trial number: NCT03267615Graphical abstractPhysiology of enterohepatic FXR-FGF19 signaling and its regulation in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). (FXR) farnesoid X receptor; (FGF19) fibroblast growth factor 19; (BA) bile acids; (c/dACLD) compensated/decompensated advanced chronic liver disease; (FXR) farnesoid X receptor; (SHP) small heterodimer partner; (OST-α/-β) organic solute transporter subunit alpha/beta; (CYP7A1) cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase; (NTCP) Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide; (CYP8B1) sterol 12-alpha-hydroxylase; (HVPG) hepatic venous pressure gradient; (TJ) tight junctions; (AMP) antimicrobial peptides; (ASBT) Apical Sodium Dependent Bile Acid Transporter; (ZO 1) zonula occludens-1; (OCLN) occluding; (DEFA5) alpha-5-defensin.

Hepatic hemodynamic study: More than just HVPG measurement

Evaluation and staging of liver disease is essential in the clinical decision-making process of liver tumors. The severity of portal hypertension (PH) is the main prognostic factor in advanced liver disease. Performing an accurate hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is not always possible, especially when veno-venous communications are present. In those complex cases, a refinement in HVPG measurement with a thorough evaluation of each of the components of PH is mandatory. We aimed at describing how some technical modifications and complementary procedures may contribute to an accurate and complete clinical evaluation to improve therapeutic decisions.

Portal hypertension in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Current knowledge and challenges.

Portal hypertension (PH) has traditionally been observed as a consequence of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in advanced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, recent studies have provided evidence that PH may develop in earlier stages of NAFLD, suggesting that there are additional pathogenetic mechanisms at work in addition to liver fibrosis. The early development of PH in NAFLD is associated with hepatocellular lipid accumulation and ballooning, leading to the compression of liver sinusoids. External compression and intra-luminal obstacles cause mechanical forces such as strain, shear stress and elevated hydrostatic pressure that in turn activate mechanotransduction pathways, resulting in endothelial dysfunction and the development of fibrosis. The spatial distribution of histological and functional changes in the periportal and perisinusoidal areas of the liver lobule are considered responsible for the pre-sinusoidal component of PH in patients with NAFLD. Thus, current diagnostic methods such as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement tend to underestimate portal pressure (PP) in NAFLD patients, who might decompensate below the HVPG threshold of 10 mmHg, which is traditionally considered the most relevant indicator of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). This creates further challenges in finding a reliable diagnostic method to stratify the prognostic risk in this population of patients. In theory, the measurement of the portal pressure gradient guided by endoscopic ultrasound might overcome the limitations of HVPG measurement by avoiding the influence of the pre-sinusoidal component, but more investigations are needed to test its clinical utility for this indication. Liver and spleen stiffness measurement in combination with platelet count is currently the best-validated non-invasive approach for diagnosing CSPH and varices needing treatment. Lifestyle change remains the cornerstone of the treatment of PH in NAFLD, together with correcting the components of metabolic syndrome, using nonselective beta blockers, whereas emerging candidate drugs require more robust confirmation from clinical trials.

HVPG minimally invasive era: exploration based on forearm venous approach

Objective: The transjugular or transfemoral approach is used as a common method for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement in current practice. This study aims to confirm the safety and effectiveness of measuring HVPG via the forearm venous approach. Methods: Prospective recruitment was conducted for patients with cirrhosis who underwent HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach at six hospitals in China and Japan from September 2020 to December 2020. Patients' clinical baseline information and HVPG measurement data were collected. The right median cubital vein or basilic vein approach for all enrolled patients was selected. The HVPG standard process was used to measure pressure. Research data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. Quantitative data were used to represent medians (interquartile ranges), while qualitative data were used to represent frequency and rates. The correlation between two sets of data was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. Results: A total of 43 cases were enrolled in this study. Of these, 41 (95.3%) successfully underwent HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach. None of the patients had any serious complications. The median operation time for HVPG detection via forearm vein was 18.0 minutes (12.3~38.8 minutes). This study confirmed that HVPG was positively closely related to Child-Pugh score (r = 0.47, P = 0.002), albumin-bilirubin score (r = 0.37, P = 0.001), Lok index (r = 0.36, P = 0.02), liver stiffness (r = 0.58, P = 0.01), and spleen stiffness (r = 0.77, P = 0.01), while negatively correlated with albumin (r = -0.42, P = 0.006). Conclusion: The results of this multi-centre retrospective study suggest that HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach is safe and feasible.