Component impingement due to poor positioning can limit range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Contact stresses on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene are also dependent on the orientation of the acetabular component. In this study, a computer kinematic model was used to determine the effects of component position and variation of head:neck ratios on prosthetic impingement and hip range of motion, and a finite element model was employed to calculate polyethylene stresses at different cup positions. ### Kinematic Analysis A three-dimensional total hip prosthesis with a hemispherical acetabular cup, femoral neck diameters ranging from 10 to 12 mm, and head sizes ranging from 22 to 32 mm was generated (Fig. 1). The maximum range of motion of the hip was measured, before impingement of the neck on the cup liner, for acetabular component abduction angles ranging from 35° to 55° and for acetabular component anteversion angles ranging from 0° to 30°. The effect, on the range of motion of the hip, of a wide chamfer that was offset 1, 2, or 3 mm above or below the center of the head was also analyzed (Fig. 2). Fig. 1: Computer model used for kinematic analysis. The head diameters ranged from 22 to 32 mm, the neck diameters ranged from 10 to 12 mm, and the liner outer diameter was 50 mm. Fig. 2: Liner with a wide chamfer that was offset 2 mm above the center of the head to increase range of motion. ### Finite Element Analysis A model of a total hip prosthesis was generated with a finite element analysis program (MARC; MSC Corporation). The acetabular liner was modeled as a hemisphere with an inner diameter of 28 mm and an outer diameter of 50 mm. The liner was composed of approximately 5000 eight-node hexahedral elements (Fig. 3). The femoral head was modeled as a spherical rigid body (28 …