Abstract Background Bloodstream infection is a common complication following hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), occurring in 10-40% of patients (1,2). Rapid identification of causative bacteria is imperative to provide proper empiric therapy and ensure optimal patient outcomes. The T2Bacteria Panel detects five bacterial pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli) using T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR, T2Biosystems, Lexington MA, USA) directly from blood specimens. Previous studies have reported per-patient sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84-90%, 85.9-90%, and 99.7%, respectively, as well as 100% positive agreement and 98.4% negative agreement when compared to blood culture (3-5). To date, there have been no studies on the use of this test in pediatric HCT recipients. Methods We reviewed all pediatric HCT patients at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital who had a T2Bacteria Panel performed for fever and suspected infection between January 2019 and September 2022. A total of 706 T2Bacteria Panel results and concurrent blood culture results from 251 unique patients were analyzed to determine assay performance for detection of the 5 targeted pathogens. Results T2Bacteria PCR and blood culture showed concordant results in 97% of cases. Overall, our study revealed 65% positive percent agreement with blood culture and 95% negative percent agreement for bacteremia caused by any of the target pathogens. PPV, NPV, sensitivity and specificity for each organism detected by the panel, and the panel overall, are presented in Table 1. Positive predictive value ranged from 28-73%. Negative predictive value was high for all organisms (98-100%). Sensitivity was highest for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (88%), and lowest for Escherichia coli (44%). Specificity was high for all organisms (97-99%). Conclusion In pediatric HSCT patients, the T2Bacteria Panel was most useful for rapidly ruling out the presence of target pathogens, with high negative percent agreement, NPV, and specificity. Positive percent agreement was lower than noted in previous studies. Positive predictive value and sensitivity varied per pathogen.
Read full abstract