Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation In First Remission Research Articles

Sorafenib plus intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML: a randomized, placebo-controlled study by the ALLG

AbstractSorafenib maintenance improves outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3–internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although promising outcomes have been reported for sorafenib plus intensive chemotherapy, randomized data are limited. This placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (ACTRN12611001112954) randomized 102 patients (aged 18-65 years) 2:1 to sorafenib vs placebo (days 4-10) combined with intensive induction: idarubicin 12 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 plus either cytarabine 1.5 g/m2 twice daily on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 (18-55 years) or 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 7 (56-65 years), followed by consolidation and maintenance therapy for 12 months (post-HCT excluded) in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3-ITD AML. Four patients were excluded in a modified intention-to-treat final analysis (3 not commencing therapy and 1 was FLT3-ITD negative). Rates of complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery were high in both arms (sorafenib, 78%/9%; placebo, 70%/24%). With 49.1-months median follow-up, the primary end point of event-free survival (EFS) was not improved by sorafenib (2-year EFS 47.9% vs 45.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.51; P = .61). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 67% in the sorafenib arm and 58% in the placebo arm (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.42-1.39). For patients who received HCT in first remission, the 2-year OS rates were 84% and 67% in the sorafenib and placebo arms, respectively (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.18-1.12; P = .08). In exploratory analyses, FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) negative status (<0.001%) after induction was associated with improved 2-year OS (83% vs 60%; HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.17-0.93; P = .028). In conclusion, routine use of pretransplant sorafenib plus chemotherapy in unselected patients with FLT3-ITD AML is not supported by this study.

A Prospective Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax and Low Dose Ara-C (VALDAC) to Target Rising Molecular Measurable Residual Disease and Early Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction The 2021 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recognizes MRD relapse as ≥1 log rise confirmed on repeat testing (Heuser Blood 2021). Molecular MRD relapse (e.g. NPM1mut) precedes clinical relapse by ~3-4 months (Ivey NEJM 2016) and provides a window of opportunity for pre-emptive therapy to be delivered prior to clinical relapse. Venetoclax (VEN)-based low intensity therapy is associated with rapid achievement of clinical response in older patients (pts) with AML (DiNardo NEJM 2020 and Wei Blood 2020) but only has modest activity in relapsed/refractory AML. We hypothesized that VEN-based therapy initiated at the time of MRD relapse could be associated with improved clinical response and longer clinical benefit. We therefore conducted a prospective study to explore the efficacy of low dose ara-C (LDAC) + VEN in pts with AML and MRD relapse (ACTRN12619000746134). Methods This multicenter phase 2 study stratified pts into either oligoblastic relapse (marrow blasts 5-15%; Group A), or molecular MRD relapse (Group B). Pts received VEN 600 mg (days 1-28, without dose ramp-up for Group B) and LDAC 20 mg/m2 sc (days 1-10). Primary objectives were morphologic or MRD response (≥1 log reduction) in groups A and B, respectively. Key secondary objectives were realization of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The study was approved by Alfred Health ethics committee (196/19). NPM1mut and other fusions (per 100 ABL1) from bone marrow were analyzed by RT-qPCR, and IDH1/2mut by Bio-RadTM droplet digital PCR. Results A total of 48 pts were recruited (median age 67; range 18-80). Cytogenetic risk was intermediate in 91%, favorable in 4.5% and adverse in 4.5%. Most (94%) had received prior intensive chemotherapy and only 2 (4%) had received prior HCT in first remission. The median interval from AML diagnosis to study entry was 13.7 months (IQR 9, 23). At the time of study screening, 22 (46%) pts had oligoblastic disease and 26 (54%) MRD relapse. Oligoblastic relapse included pts with early progression not captured by interval MRD surveillance. Pts received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-21+) of VEN-LDAC (ongoing in 11). Reasons for treatment cessation in 37 pts were: HCT (n=19, 51%), treatment failure (n=11, 30%), adverse events (n=3), donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI, n=2) or death before response assessment (n=2). One patient (Group B, NPM1mut) was deemed not evaluable for response assessment after only receiving 9 days of therapy but included in the survival analysis. Among 22 pts with oligoblastic disease, CR/CRi was achieved in 17 (77%). Two additional pts achieved morphologic leukemia-free state and 1 had stable disease. MRD response (≥1 log reduction) among those with an evaluable marker (N=8; all NPM1 mutated) was achieved in 8/8 (100%), with MRD negative in 6/8 (75%) (Figure). Among 25 evaluable pts with MRD relapse, MRD response (≥1 log reduction) was observed in 68% and MRD negative in 52%. Of patients with NPM1mut AML treated at MRD relapse, 13/19 (68%) achieved an MRD response and 10/19 (53%) an MRD negative response (Figure). An MRD response was observed in 2/3 with IDH1/2mut, 1/2 with core-binding factor and 1/1 with KMT2A::MLLT3. Bridging to HCT or DLI (median time 4 months) was successful in 18/27 (67%) pts ≤70 years. With a median follow up time of 14.4 months, the median RFS was 21.5 months and not reached for OS. The estimated 18-month RFS was 63.3% (95% CI, 48.0-83.5) and OS 71.1% (95% CI, 56.5-89.4). Similar outcomes were observed for Groups A and B. Subsequent HCT (as a time-dependent covariate) was the only significant factor for RFS (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.61) but not OS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.13-1.75) in a multivariate Cox regression model that included age, features at original diagnosis (NPM1, FLT3-ITD and ELN 2017 risk), time since AML diagnosis, and study cohort (A vs B). FLT3-ITD was detected in 3/7 (43%) of relapsed pts. Conclusions In this prospective study of pts with early relapsing AML (oligoblastic or MRD relapse), VEN in combination with LDAC induced a high rate of molecular MRD response, resulting in excellent RFS and OS outcomes. Follow-up is ongoing to determine the durability of response. This novel MRD-targeting approach is being further investigated in a multi-arm, precision-based platform trial ( INTERCEPT: Investigating Novel Therapy to Target Early Relapse and Clonal Evolution as Pre-emptive Therapy in AML; ACTRN12621001265864). Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Indications for transplantation in childhood acute leukemia and the impact of minimal residual disease on relapse: a review

SUMMARY: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for pediatric acute leukemia continues to offer a cure for some patients with high-risk or relapsed disease. Presently, HCT in first remission is recommended only for patients with predicted leukemia-free survival <50%. Despite recent advances, relapse remains the biggest hurdle in HCT. Minimal residual disease (MRD) identified pre-HCT is one of the strongest predictors for relapse for both acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. Therefore, novel approaches are needed to eliminate pre-HCT MRD, safely bridging patients to HCT and diminishing relapse. This review highlights the current outcomes for HCT in pediatric acute leukemia, describing the current indications for HCT as well as the significant impact pre-HCT MRD has on relapse for these patients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allogeneic HCT) for treatment of pediatric Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with best available donor for children with Philadelphia positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has previously been considered standard practice. Since the introduction of imatinib into the treatment of this disease, the role of allogeneic HCT is more uncertain. We investigated the impact of remission status, graft source, and imatinib use on transplant outcomes for 37 children with Ph+ ALL who received an allogeneic HCT at the University of Minnesota between 1990 and 2006. The median age at HCT was 7.47 (range; 1.4-16.4) years. Thirteen patients received imatinib therapy pre- and/or post-HCT (imatinib group) and 24 patients, received either no imatinib (n = 23) or only post-HCT relapse (n = 1) (non-imatinib group). There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) or relapse between the imatinib and non-imatinib groups at 3 years (62%/15% vs. 53%/26%; P = 0.99; 0.81, respectively). There was no significant difference in transplant outcomes between matched related donor or unrelated donor (umbilical cord blood or matched unrelated marrow) recipients whereas patients receiving allogeneic HCT in first remission (CR1) had superior DFS and less relapse compared to patients transplanted in >or=CR2 (71%/16% vs. 29%/36%; P = 0.01; P = 0.05). Based on this retrospective analysis at a single institution, the use of imatinib either pre- and/or post-transplant does not appear to significantly impact outcomes for children with Ph+ ALL and allogeneic HCT with the best available donor should be encouraged in CR1.