Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Research Articles

Novel machine learning technique further clarifies unrelated donor selection to optimize transplantation outcomes

AbstractWe investigated the impact of donor characteristics on outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients using a novel machine learning approach, the Nonparametric Failure Time Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (NFT BART). NFT BART models were trained on data from 10 016 patients who underwent a first HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 matched unrelated donor HCT between 2016 and 2019, reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, then validated on an independent cohort of 1802 patients. The NFT BART models were adjusted based on recipient, disease, and transplant variables. We defined a clinically meaningful impact on overall survival (OS) or event-free survival (EFS; survival without relapse, graft failure, or moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease) as >1% difference in predicted outcome at 3 years. Characteristics with <1% impact (within a zone of indifference) were not considered to be clinically relevant. Donor cytomegalovirus, parity, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DPB1 T-cell epitope matching fell within the zone of indifference. The only significant donor factor that associated with OS was age, in which, compared with 18-year-old donors, donors aged ≥31 years old were associated with lower OS. Both donor age (≤32 years) and use of a male donor, regardless of recipient sex, improved EFS. We, therefore, recommend selecting the earliest available donor within the 18 to 30 years age range for HCT to optimize OS. If several donors in the 18 to 30 years age range are available, a male donor may be chosen to optimize EFS.

New insights into hematopoietic cell transplantation in ALL: Who should be transplanted, when, and how

Advancements in multi-agent chemotherapy through clinical trials conducted by multi-institutional collaborative groups worldwide, along with risk stratification using molecular genetic features and treatment responses, including minimal residual disease, have significantly improved outcomes for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) over the past half-century. However, for a certain number of high-risk patients, including those with relapsed or refractory disease, for whom existing chemotherapy alone is insufficient for cure, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has provided a potential opportunity for leukemia cure. For these patients, the appropriate selection of donor and stem cell source, conditioning regimen, timing of transplantation, and comprehensive supportive care, including effective graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, are prerequisites for successful HCT. While HCT from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling has traditionally been the preferred option, less than 25 % of patients currently have such a donor in developed countries. Consequently, alternative donor HCT options, such as those from matched unrelated donors identified through high-resolution HLA typing, unrelated cord blood donors, and more recently, haploidentical donors using post-transplant cyclophosphamide or TCRαβ+/CD19+ cell-depleted grafts, are providing broader access to HCT for patients lacking matched sibling donors. Nonetheless, HCT carries the risk of various acute and late toxicities. In particular, the use of myeloablative conditioning with total body irradiation, a standard in pediatric ALL, is associated with significant long-term sequelae. As our understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease improves and novel molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies are developed, the indication for HCT in pediatric ALL is becoming more selective, leading to a gradual decrease in the number of transplants performed. However, further optimization and evolution of allogeneic HCT are needed to both maximize its anti-leukemia effects and minimize transplant-related complications, as there remain cases that undoubtedly require HCT for the cure of leukemia.

Haploidentical vs HLA-matched sibling donor HCT with PTCy prophylaxis: HLA factors and donor age considerations

AbstractHLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs) are preferred for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the use of alternative donors, especially haploidentical, is increasing, as is our understanding of the impact of HLA factors such as B-leader and DRB1-matching on its outcomes. Yet, data comparing these donor types, particularly considering these HLA factors, is lacking. Herein, we compared haploidentical-HCT (n = 1052) with MSD-HCT (n = 400), both with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, haploidentical group had similar overall survival (OS; hazard ratio (HR), 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.14; P = .54), nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.72-1.32; P = .87), and relapse (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08; P = .20) as the MSD group. Younger donor age was a significant predictor of improved OS. Next, we directly compared the outcomes of “younger” haploidentical (donor age <35 years, n = 347) vs an “older” MSD (donor age ≥50 years, n = 143) in older recipients (patient age ≥50 years). Patients with younger haploidentical B-leader–matched donors had significantly superior OS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; P = .009) than the older MSD group. Additionally, patients with younger DRB1-mismatched haploidentical donors (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87; P = .004) had significantly lower risk of relapse than older MSDs. Our study suggests that haploidentical-HCT may offer comparable outcomes to MSD-PTCy HCT. Moreover, among older patients, a younger haploidentical B-leader–matched donor might be preferable to an older MSD. These findings need validation in larger data sets.

Comparing transplant outcomes in ALL patients after myeloablative conditioning in mismatch-related or unrelated donor settings

The optimal myeloablative conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with an alternative donor is unknown. We analyzed HCT outcomes ALL patients (n = 269) who underwent HCT at our center from 2010 to 2020 in complete remission (CR) after FTBI-etoposide and CNI-based GvHD prophylaxis for matched donor HCT (ETOP-package; n = 196) or FTBI-Fludarabine and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis for HLA- mismatched (related or unrelated) donors (FLU-package; n = 64). Patients in FLU-package showed a significant delay in engraftment (p < 0.001) and lower cumulative incidence (CI) of any and extensive chronic GVHD (p = 0.009 and 0.001, respectively). At the median follow up of 4.6 years (range 1–12 years); non-relapse mortality, overall or leukemia-free survival and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival were not significantly impacted by the choice of conditioning. However, in patients at CR2 or with measurable residual disease (MRD+), there was a trend towards higher relapse after FLU-package (p = 0.08 and p = 0.07, respectively), while patients at CR1 regardless of MRD status had similar outcomes despite the package/donor type (p = 0.9 and 0.7, respectively). Our data suggests that FLU-package for alternative donors offers comparable outcomes to ETOP-package for matched donor HCT to treat ALL. Disease status and depth of remission at HCT were independent predictors for better outcomes.

Total Body Irradiation and Fludarabine with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Mismatched Related or Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the sole curative treatment for most patients with hematologic malignancies. A well-matched donor (related or unrelated) remains the preferred donor for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT; however, a large number of patients rely on alternative donor choices of mismatched related (haploidentical) or unrelated donors to access HCT. In this retrospective study, we investigated outcomes of patients who underwent mismatched donor (related or unrelated) HCT with a radiation-based myeloablative conditioning MAC regimen in combination with fludarabine, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as higher-intensity graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We retrospectively assessed HCT outcomes in 155 patients who underwent mismatched donor HCT (related/haploidentical versus unrelated [MMUD]) with fractionated-total body irradiation (fTBI) plus fludarabine and PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis at City of Hope from 2015 to 2021. Diagnoses included acute lymphoblastic leukemia (46.5%), acute myelogenous leukemia (36.1%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (6.5%). The median age at HCT was 38 years, and 126 patients (81.3%) were an ethnic minority. The Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index was ≥3 in 36.1% of the patients, and 29% had a Disease Risk Index (DRI) of high/very high. The donor type was haploidentical in 67.1% of cases and MMUD in 32.9%. At 2 years post-HCT, disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.4% and overall survival (OS) was 80.6% for all subjects. Donor type did not impact OS (hazard ratio [HR], .72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .35 to 1.49; P = .37) and DFS (HR, .78; 95% CI, .41 to 1.48; P = .44), but younger donors was associated with less grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 6.60; 95% CI, 1.80 to 24.19; P = .004) and less moderate or severe chronic GVHD (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.70 to 7.34; P < .001), with a trend toward better survival (P = .099). The use of an MMUD was associated with significantly faster neutrophil recovery (median, 15 days versus 16 days; P = .014) and platelet recovery (median, 18 days versus 24 days; P = .029); however, there was no difference in GVHD outcomes between the haploidentical donor and MMUD groups. Nonrelapse mortality (HR, .86; 95% CI, .34 to 2.20; P = .76) and relapse risk (HR, .78; 95% CI, .33 to 1.85; P = .57) were comparable in the 2 groups. Patient age <40 years and low-intermediate DRI showed a DFS benefit (P = .004 and .029, respectively). High or very high DRI was the only predictor of increased relapse (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.34; P = .008). In conclusion, fludarabine/fTBI with PTCy was well-tolerated in mismatched donor HCT, regardless of donor relationship to the patient, provided promising results, and increased access to HCT for patients without a matched donor, especially patients from ethnic minorities and patients of mixed race.

Interplay between donor age and HLA-DP matching in 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT

AbstractIn 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based prophylaxis, T-cell epitope DP-matched and permissive mismatched donors are associated with similar overall survival (OS) whereas donors with nonpermissive mismatches should be avoided. Younger unrelated donors are also favored over older donors. We explored outcomes associated with different combinations of DP-matching and donor age (dichotomized at 35 years) to further guide donor selection. Using a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data set, we categorized 10 783 patients into 6 groups: DP-matched/younger donor (n = 1591), DP-matched/older donor (n = 526), permissive-mismatched/younger donor (n = 3845), permissive-mismatched/older donor (n = 1184), nonpermissive mismatched/younger donor (n = 2659), and nonpermissive mismatched/older donor (n = 978). We noted that younger donor age, rather than DP matching, was associated with better OS. Younger donors with permissive mismatches were associated with improved OS compared with older matched donors. Furthermore, younger donors with nonpermissive mismatches were associated with improved OS compared with older donors with permissive mismatches. Our study adds further information about the association of DP matching and donor age with HCT outcomes. Donor age should be prioritized over DP matching in patients undergoing 10/10 HLA-MUD with CNI prophylaxis. Among those with younger donors, permissive-mismatched or DP-matched donors are preferred over nonpermissive mismatched donors.

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Attenuates Disparity in Outcomes Between Use of Matched or Mismatched Unrelated Donors.

PURPOSEAccess to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains limited among persons of non-European ancestry if human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching is required. We evaluated whether post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis improved HCT outcomes with HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) and mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT when compared with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based prophylaxis.METHODSThree-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were compared between adult recipients undergoing initial MUD or single HLA locus MMUD HCT with either PTCy- or CNI-based prophylaxis who were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 2017 and 2021.RESULTSIncluded were 10,025 HCT recipients (7,272 recipients of MUD with CNI, 1,681 MUD with PTCy, 613 MMUD with CNI, and 459 MMUD with PTCy) who underwent HCT for acute leukemia (70.9%) or myelodysplastic syndromes (29.2%). Median patient age was 60.7 years (range, 18.0-82.7) and median follow-up was 36.6 (range, 3.0-77.8) months. When compared with MUD HCT with PTCy, MMUD HCT with PTCy had similar OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.823 to 1.11]; P = .60) and GRFS (HR, 0.90 [0.79 to 1.02]; P = .1). When compared with MUD HCT with CNI, OS was improved after MUD HCT with PTCy (HR, 0.88 [0.80 to 0.96]; P = .004) and GRFS was improved with PTCy after either MUD (HR, 0.61 [0.57 to 0.66]; P < .0001) or MMUD (HR, 0.68 [0.60 to 0.76]; P < .0001) HCT. Benefit from PTCy was independent of patient ancestry. Global registry level analysis demonstrated that inclusion of MMUD increased donor availability regardless of recipient ancestry.CONCLUSIONUse of PTCy results in comparable OS and GRFS using either MUD or MMUD HCT, expanding access to HCT for patients from all racial and ethnic ancestry groups.

The health risk of social disadvantage is transplantable into a new host

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor for mortality and immune dysfunction across a wide range of diseases, including cancer. However, cancer is distinct in the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as a treatment for hematologic malignancies to transfer healthy hematopoietic cells from one person to another. This raises the question of whether social disadvantage of an HCT cell donor, as assessed by low SES, might impact the subsequent health outcomes of the HCT recipient. To evaluate the cellular transplantability of SES-associated health risk, we analyzed the health outcomes of 2,005 HCT recipients who were transplanted for hematologic malignancy at 125 United States transplant centers and tested whether their outcomes differed as a function of their cell donor's SES (controlling for other known HCT-related risk factors). Recipients transplanted with cells from donors in the lowest quartile of SES experienced a 9.7% reduction in overall survival (P = 0.001) and 6.6% increase in treatment-related mortality within 3 y (P = 0.008) compared to those transplanted from donors in the highest SES quartile. These results are consistent with previous research linking socioeconomic disadvantage to altered immune cell function and hematopoiesis, and they reveal an unanticipated persistence of those effects after cells are transferred into a new host environment. These SES-related disparities in health outcomes underscore the need to map the biological mechanisms involved in the social determinants of health and develop interventions to block those effects and enhance the health of both HCT donors and recipients.

Donor types and outcomes of transplantation in myelofibrosis: a CIBMTR study

AbstractWe evaluate the impact of donor types on outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in myelofibrosis, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry data for HCTs done between 2013 and 2019. In all 1597 patients, the use of haploidentical donors increased from 3% in 2013 to 19% in 2019. In study-eligible 1032 patients who received peripheral blood grafts for chronic-phase myelofibrosis, 38% of recipients of haploidentical HCT were non-White/Caucasian. Matched sibling donor (MSD)–HCTs were associated with superior overall survival (OS) in the first 3 months (haploidentical hazard ratio [HR], 5.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.52-13.35]; matched unrelated (MUD) HR, 4.50 [95% CI, 2.24-9.03]; mismatched unrelated HR, 5.13 [95% CI, 1.44-18.31]; P < .001). This difference in OS aligns with lower graft failure with MSD (haploidentical HR, 6.11 [95% CI, 2.98-12.54]; matched unrelated HR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.20-4.51]; mismatched unrelated HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.58-5.72]). There was no significant difference in OS among haploidentical, MUD, and mismatched unrelated donor HCTs in the first 3 months. Donor type was not associated with differences in OS beyond 3 months after HCT, relapse, disease-free survival, or OS among patients who underwent HCT within 24 months of diagnosis. Patients who experienced graft failure had more advanced disease and commonly used nonmyeloablative conditioning. Although MSD-HCTs were superior, there is no significant difference in HCT outcomes from haploidentical and MUDs. These results establish haploidentical HCT with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide as a viable option in myelofibrosis, especially for ethnic minorities underrepresented in the donor registries.

Clinical impact of clonal hematopoiesis in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a review, metaanalysis, and call to action.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment option for many patients with hematologic malignancies. While HCT outcomes have improved drastically over the years, patients and clinicians continue to face numerous survivorship challenges, such as relapse, graft-versushost disease, and secondary malignancies. Recent literature suggests that clonal hematopoiesis (CH), the presence of a recurrent somatic mutation in hematopoietic cells, in HCT patients or donors may be associated with outcomes in autologous and allogeneic HCT. Herein, we perform a review of the literature and summarize reported associations between CH and clinical outcomes in HCT. For commonly reported outcomes, we used meta-analysis methods to provide estimates of effect sizes when combining results. A total of 32 articles with relevant and independent contributions were included, covering both autologous (n = 19) and allogeneic (n = 13) HCT. The articles report variable risk for developing outcomes according to CH characteristics, patient disease status, and method of HCT. Using meta-analysis of available results, HCT outcomes with statistically significant effects by CH status include therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (OR 3.65, 95%CI 2.18-6.10) and overall survival (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.20-1.58) in autologous HCT and relapse (HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.68-0.94) in allogeneic HCT. However, heterogeneity, biases, and limitations in the literature provide challenges for informing the translation of CH to clinical decision-making. We conclude with a call to action and discussion of next steps to build upon the current literature and provide granularity to the true clinical impact of CH in the setting of HCT.

Optimizing Access to Unrelated Donors in Canada: Re-Examining the Importance of Donor Factors on Outcomes Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

HLA-matched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative therapy for many patients. Unrelated HLA-matched donors are the most frequently used donor for HCT. When more than one donor transplant option is available, transplant centers can select donors based on non-HLA factors. With improved ability to prevent and treat immune complications, such as graft-versus-host disease and infections, it may be possible to proceed more often using HLA-mismatched donors, allowing greater consideration of non-HLA factors, such as donor age, CMV serostatus, and ABO blood group matching, which have demonstrated important impacts on transplant outcomes. Additional factors to consider are donor availability rates and the usage of domestic donors to optimize outcomes. A review of non-HLA factors and considerations on the selection of optimal unrelated donors for HCT are provided within this updated current context.

Good engraftment after reduced intensity targeted busulfan-based conditioning and matched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation in hemoglobinopathies.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative therapy for transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) and sickle cell disease (SCD). The latest American Society of Hematology guidelines recommend myeloablative preparative regimen in patients under 18years of age. The objective was to demonstrate safety and efficacy of a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen including high-dose fludarabine, anti-thymocyte globulin, and targeted busulfan as a single alkylator to sub-myeloablative exposures. Between 2012 and 2021, 11 patients with SCD and five patients with TDT and matched related donor (MRD) HCT were included. The median age at transplantation was 8.3years (range: 3.7-18.8years). The median administered busulfan AUC was 67.4mg/L×h (range: 60.7-80mg/L×h). Overall survival was 93.8% and event-free survival 87.5% with one engrafted SCD patient with pre-existing moyamoya disease succumbing after drainage of a subdural hematoma. One SCD patient developed a secondary graft failure and was treated with a second HCT. Myeloid chimerism was full in all other patients with a median follow-up time of 4.1years (range: 2.0-11.1years), whereas T-cell donor chimerism was frequently mixed. This RIC conditioning followed by MRD HCT is sufficiently myeloablative to cure pediatric patients with hemoglobinopathies without the need for additional total body irradiation or thiotepa.

Donor whole blood DNA methylation is not a strong predictor of acute graft versus host disease in unrelated donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is used to treat many blood-based disorders and malignancies, however it can also result in serious adverse events, such as the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). This study aimed to develop a donor-specific epigenetic classifier to reduce incidence of aGVHD by improving donor selection. Genome-wide DNA methylation was assessed in a discovery cohort of 288 HCT donors selected based on recipient aGVHD outcome; this cohort consisted of 144 cases with aGVHD grades III-IV and 144 controls with no aGVHD. We applied a machine learning algorithm to identify CpG sites predictive of aGVHD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of these sites resulted in a classifier with an encouraging area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.91. To test this classifier, we used an independent validation cohort (n = 288) selected using the same criteria as the discovery cohort. Attempts to validate the classifier failed with the AUC falling to 0.51. These results indicate that donor DNA methylation may not be a suitable predictor of aGVHD in an HCT setting involving unrelated donors, despite the initial promising results in the discovery cohort. Our work highlights the importance of independent validation of machine learning classifiers, particularly when developing classifiers intended for clinical use.

Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation for Fanconi Anemia With a Special Focus on Late Complications: a Study on Behalf of Eurocord and SAAWP-EBMT

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the sole available curative treatment for Fanconi anemia (FA), with particularly favorable outcomes reported after matched sibling donor (MSD) HCT. This study aimed to describe outcomes, with a special focus on late complications, of FA patients who underwent umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). In this retrospective analysis of allogeneic UCBT for FA performed between 1988 and 2021 in European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-affiliated centers, a total of 205 FA patients underwent UCBT (55 related and 150 unrelated) across 77 transplant centers. Indications for UCBT were bone marrow failure in 190 patients and acute leukemia/myelodysplasia in 15 patients. The median age at transplantation was 9 years (range, 1.2 to 43 years), with only 20 patients aged >18 years. Among the donor-recipient pairs, 56% (n = 116) had a 0 to 1/6 HLA mismatch. Limited-field radiotherapy was administered to 28% (n = 58) and 78% (n = 160) received a fludarabine (Flu)-based conditioning regimen. Serotherapy consisted of antithymocyte globulin (n = 159; 78%) or alemtuzumab (n = 12; 6%). The median follow-up was 10 years for related UCBT and 7 years for unrelated UCBT. Excellent outcomes were observed in the setting of related UCBT, including a 60-day cumulative incidence (CuI) of neutrophil recovery of 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.9% to 100%), a 100-day CuI of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of 17.3% (95% CI, 9.5% to 31.6%), and a 5-year CuI of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) of 22.7% (95% CI, 13.3% to 38.7%; 13% extensive). Five-year overall survival (OS) was 88%. In multivariate analysis, none of the factors included in the model predicted a better OS. In unrelated UCBT, the 60-day CuI of neutrophil recovery was 78.7% (95% CI, 71.9% to 86.3%), the 100-day CuI of grade II-IV aGVHD was 31.4% (95% CI, 24.6% to 40.2%), and the 5-year CuI of cGVHD was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.8% to 32.2%; 12% extensive). Five-year OS was 44%. In multivariate analysis, negative recipient cytomegalovirus serology, Flu-based conditioning, age <9 years at UCBT, and 0 to 1/6 HLA mismatch were associated with improved OS. A total of 106 patients, including 5 with acute leukemia/myelodysplasia, survived for >2 years after UCBT. Nine of these patients developed subsequent neoplasms (SNs), including 1 donor-derived acute myelogenous leukemia and 8 solid tumors, at a median of 9.7 years (range, 2.3 to 21.8 years) post-UCBT (1 related and 8 unrelated UCBT). In a subset of 49 patients with available data, late nonmalignant complications affecting various organ systems were observed at a median of 8.7 years (range, 2.7 to 28.8 years) post-UCBT. UCB is a valid source of stem cells for transplantation in patients with FA, with the best results observed after related UCBT. After unrelated UCBT, improved survival was observed in patients who underwent transplantation at a younger age, with Flu-based conditioning, and with better HLA parity. The incidence of organ-specific complications and SNs was relatively low. The incidence of SNs, mostly squamous cell carcinoma, increases with time. Rigorous follow-up and lifelong screening are crucial in survivors of UCBT for FA.

Myocardial Fibrosis Improves in Young Patients with Sickle Cell Disease after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Introduction: Cardiovascular complications are a leading cause of early mortality in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Chronic anemia, iron overload and repeated microvascular ischemic insults with reperfusion injury often result in progressive myocardial injury and maladaptive remodeling in SCD patients. Patients with SCD develop diffuse myocardial fibrosis, which can be detected by quantifying the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Our group and others have previously shown that diffuse myocardial fibrosis is highly prevalent in both children and young adults with SCD, including those who have normal ventricular size and function by echocardiography. Additionally, we have shown that the disease modifying therapies (DMT) such as hydroxyurea or chronic transfusions do not appear to be protective against development of diffuse myocardial fibrosis. In a retrospective study, we found no difference in the myocardial ECV in patients who began DMT early (less than 6 years of age) versus later in life (at least 6 years or after) (Morin CE and Sharma A et al. Blood 2023.). Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can cure SCD, but myocardial effects of the therapy are unknown. Our goal was to evaluate cardiovascular parameters of function and injury, especially the progression of diffuse myocardial fibrosis, by comparing serial CMR studies performed before and after HCT in patients with SCD. Methods: We performed prospective CMR evaluation of children and young adults with SCD who received a matched sibling donor (MSD) or haploidentical donor (HAPLO) HCT following a reduced toxicity conditioning on a clinical trial (NCT04362293). CMR was performed pre-HCT, and at 1 month, and 12 months post-HCT. CMR-derived ventricular and atrial volumes were calculated. ECV was measured from T1 maps with a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence in short-axis. T2 and T2* maps were obtained. Regions of interest in the mid-ventricular septum were identified for analysis. We report descriptive statistics for CMR measures along with paired t-tests comparing patient ECV levels at 1-month and 12-months post-HCT to their respective baseline ECV. Results: Our study cohort consisted of 14 patients with SCD who underwent HCT and had serial CMR evaluations available. Thirteen patients had HbSS genotype and one had HbSC genotype. All patients were receiving DMT, either with hydroxyurea or chronic transfusions prior to HCT. Participants were majority male (57%) with median age of 15.2 years (range 6.8-21.3) at the pre-HCT CMR. Six received an MSD HCT and 8 received a HAPLO HCT. Ten patients each had follow up CMR evaluations performed at 1 month, and 12 months post-HCT. At 1 and 12 months post-HCT ejection fraction was preserved while biventricular volume and cardiac index decreased (Table 1). Compared to pre-HCT, ECV decreased from median 29% [range 27-38] to 28% (range 21-35, P= 0.061) at 1 month and 27% (range 24-31, P= 0.043) at 12 months post-HCT. There was no difference in the cardiac chamber sizes or the ECV measurements of those who received a MSD versus HAPLO HCT. Conclusions: We observed an improvement in cardiac chamber sizes with preservation of cardiac function as early as one month after HCT in patients with SCD. We further noted a reduction in ECV indicating a decrease in diffuse myocardial fibrosis in these young patients with SCD. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that diffuse myocardial fibrosis can improve in patients with SCD after HCT. In addition to further corroborating the organ function protective effects of HCT in patients with SCD, these data further demonstrate the use of CMR as an essential non-invasive tool to assess the effects of therapeutic interventions on SCD-cardiac injury.

Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation of Patients with Toll-like Receptor 8 Gain-of-Function Mutations

Toll-like receptor 8 gain-of-function (TLR8 GOF) is a recently described inborn error of immunity due to germline or somatic mutations in the TLR8 gene and characterized by severe neutropenia, infections, lymphoproliferation, humoral immune defects, and in some cases, bone marrow failure. Treatment of TLR8 GOF has been challenging to date, and guidance for optimal therapy is lacking. We describe the clinical characteristics and management of 10 patients with TLR8 GOF variants, including the first female patient and further clinical outcome on the 6 patients initially reported with this disease with a focus on the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). All but one patient were male ranging from 0.5 months to 28 years at age of symptom onset. Eight patients had somatic mutations with variant allele frequencies of 7-26%; two patients had germline mutations. The 9 male patients all had severe neutropenia and varying degrees of anemia and/or thrombocytopenia. Oral ulcers, recurrent infections, hepatosplenomegaly, and hypogammaglobulinemia were common. Immune phenotype was variable, ranging from severe lymphopenia to marked T cell lymphoproliferation. Several patients had an inverted CD4:CD8 T cell ratio and skewing of T cell subsets to the terminal effector memory phenotype. Increased double-negative T cells were also observed. All patients had low class switched memory B cells. Bone marrows were hypo- to hypercellular with marked myeloid hypoplasia, and in most cases, with increased T cells, large granular lymphocytes, and/or lymphoid aggregates. Neutropenia was initially responsive to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) +/- steroids in several patients but ultimately become refractory to therapy. Immunomodulatory agents and chemotherapy were unsuccessful. Six patients underwent allogeneic HCT; two patients died at 8 and 18 years without definitive therapy; and one patient was lost to follow-up. The female patient had germline disease and presented with pure red blood cell aplasia at 2 weeks of life and is scheduled to undergo HCT. Transplant data were available for 5 of 6 patients who underwent HCT. Age at transplant was 3 to 21 years. One patient who received a graft from a 7/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor developed severe veno-occlusive disease and secondary graft failure. The patient underwent a second transplant and ultimately died. Another patient received a matched sibling donor HCT while critically ill from Candida lusitaniae and mucormycosis infection with associated multisystem organ failure. The patient engrafted with 100% donor chimerism but died on day +15 post-HCT. The remaining 3 patients are alive and well 8 months to 2 years post-HCT. Two patients received grafts from HLA-matched donors (1 sibling and 1 unrelated) with reduced intensity conditioning and cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil and vorinostat for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The third patient underwent a haploidentical HCT with myeloablative conditioning and post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Post-HCT complications included acute skin and/or gastrointestinal GVHD that was responsive to therapy in all patients, and severe lung GVHD in one patient. There were no major infectious complications. All three patients had full donor chimerism in myeloid and T cells with complete resolution of disease phenotype at last follow-up. The patient for whom detailed transplant data is not available received a haploidentical HCT. He developed mixed myeloid chimerism for which he received multiple donor lymphocyte infusions and was alive at last contact &amp;gt;3 years post-HCT. TLR8 GOF should be considered in male and female patients with severe, unexplained neutropenia refractory to GCSF, and particular care should be taken when investigating for mutations given the disease-causing variant allele frequencies as low as 7%. Neutropenia and immune dysregulation were refractory to all therapies in our cohort, and TLR8 GOF was fatal in two patients who did not receive definitive therapy. Allogeneic HCT is curative and should be considered without delay for medically suitable patients.

Improving Outcomes of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor (MMUD) Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT): Effect of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) well matched donor (related or unrelated) has remained the preferred donor source for patients undergoing HCT for hematological disease, but the probability of finding a suitable related or unrelated donor has varied based on ethnic groups. HLA-mismatch unrelated donor (MMUD) transplantation has improved access to HCT in underrepresented minority groups and patients of mixed race. Historically, MMUD HCT has been associated with inferior survival outcomes compared to matched unrelated donor HCT when using conventional platforms of GVHD prophylaxis. (PMID: 31449184, 20538804). Efforts to improve outcomes have investigated the addition of a third agent such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), mini-methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). More recently, a study by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) demonstrated the feasibility of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based GVHD prophylaxis in MMUD HCT using bone marrow (BM) grafts (PMID: 33905264). Additionally, our group demonstrated promising overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free/relapse-free-survival (GRFS) rates in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) MMUD HCT using PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis (PMID: 34156440). Here, we compare outcomes of PBSC MMUD HCT among patients receiving GVHD prophylaxis with either: (1) tacrolimus plus sirolimus (T/S), (2) T/S plus mini-methotrexate (T/S/MTX), or (3) PTCy, MMF, and tacrolimus or sirolimus (PTCy). Patients with various hematologic malignancies that underwent PBSC MMUD HCT (≥5/8 HLA-matched donors) at City of Hope between January 2005 and December 2021 were included in this retrospective review. Of 390 subjects included, GVHD prophylaxis included T/S (n=114), T/S/MTX (n=160), and PTCy (n=116). The median age was 51 (range:15-79), 53.3% of patients belonged to a racial/ethnic minority, and 34.8% (n=136) patients had disease risk index high or very high. Degree of HLA mismatch was 7/8 (91.3%), 6/8 (8.5%), and 5/8 (0.3%). Hematologic diseases included AML (40.3%), ALL (20.3%), MDS/MPN (15.9%), Lymphoma (16.9%), and CML/CMMol (6.7%). Most common conditioning regimens were fTBI-based (34.4%) and melphalan-based (57.2%). HCT comorbidity index was ≥ 3 in 30.8% (n=120), which was most common in PTCy compared to T/S and T/S/MTX: 48.3% vs. 23.7% vs. 23.1%, P&amp;lt;.001. The rate of neutrophil engraftment (15 days vs. 15 days vs 16 days, P=0.002) and platelet engraftment (15 days vs. 16 days vs 27 days, P=0.004) were shorter in T/S compared to T/S/MTX and PTCy, respectively. With median follow-up of 5.4 years (range: 1.0-16.7) the 5-year OS was superior in PTCy (P=0.045) compared to T/S and T/S/MTX: 58.0% (95% CI: 46.6-67.8) vs. 41.1% (95% CI: 31.9-50.1) and 39.6% (95% CI: 32-47.2). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was superior in PTCy (P=0.042) compared to T/S and T/S/MTX: 54.2% (95% CI: 43.3-63.9) vs. 37.1% (95% CI: 28.2-46.0) vs. 37.2% (95% CI: 29.7-44.6), respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) in T/S vs. T/S/MTX vs. T/S vs. PTCy: 29.1% (95% CI: 21.0-37.6) vs. 29.5% (95% CI: 22.6-36.7) vs. 22.1% (95% CI: 14.3-31.0), respectively. Additionally, there was no significant difference in 2-year NRM between the cohorts (P=0.459): 24.6% (95% CI: 17.1-32.9) vs. 23.1% (95% CI: 16.9-29.9) vs. 20.4% (95% CI: 13.5-28.4), respectively. The rate of 100-day Grade III-IV acute GVHD were similar between in the cohorts (P=0.321): 19.3% (95% CI: 12.6-27.0) vs. 18.1% (95% CI: 12.6 -24.5) vs. 12.9% (95% CI: 7.6-19.7). When comparing T/S vs. T/S/MTX and PTCy, the incidence of chronic GVHD was less in the PTCy cohort at both 1-year and 2-years (P&amp;lt;.001) with 1-year incidence of 55.0% (95% CI: 45.1-63.7) vs. 61.9% (95% CI: 53.8-68.9) vs. 38.9% (95% CI: 30-47.8), respectively, and 2-year incidence of 58.9% (95% CI: 49.0-67.6) vs. 66.2% (95% CI: 58.3-73.1) vs. 42.7% (95% CI: 33.4-51.6), respectively. To our knowledge, this is the largest reported single center outcome of PBSC MMUD HCT. In this study, we demonstrate the superiority of PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis compared to T/S and T/S/MTX in outcomes of 5-year OS (P=0.045), 5-year DFS (P=0.042), and incidence of chronic GVHD (P&amp;lt;.001). Our experience further supports the superiority of PTCy as the preferred GVHD prophylaxis in the PBSC MMUD HCT setting achieved by lowering chronic GVHD and associated complications.

Long Term Follow-up after Treatment with Allogeneic Off-the-Shelf CAR T Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies

CAR T cells provide benefit in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. However, limitations of autologous products include cost, production complexity, quality of T cells, and life-threatening toxicity. To overcome these limitations, we developed allogeneic, “off-the-shelf” CD19-specific CAR T cells by transducing our institutional second-generation CD28-containing CAR (19-28z) into Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic lymphocytes (19-28z CAR EBV-CTLs). Patients with R/R B-cell malignancies were stratified into 3 treatment cohorts: cohort 1 (disease recurrence after allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)), cohort 2 (19-28z CAR EBV-CTLs as consolidative therapy after autologous HCT), or cohort 3 (19-28z CAR EBV-CTLs as consolidative therapy after allogeneic HCT). The objectives were determining dose limiting toxicity (DLT; primary endpoint) and optimal dose for multiple infusions. Sixteen patients were treated with 19-28z CAR EBV-CTLs with 8 in cohort 1 (B-ALL n=6; Burkitt lymphoma n=1; CLL n=1), 6 in cohort 2 (PMBCL n=2; DLBCL n=3; marginal zone lymphoma n=1), and 2 in cohort 3 (DLBCL n=2). Median age at treatment was 30 years (range 1-71 years). All patients were heavily pretreated, receiving a median of 5 lines of therapy (including any HCT received; range 3-11 lines of therapy) prior to 19-28z CAR EBV-CTLs. Dosing on this protocol was based off T cells/kg: median dose infused was 3x10 6 T cells/kg (range 1-10x10 6 T cells/kg). Twelve patients received multiple doses (overall median 2.5; range 1-3) with 3x10 6 T cells/kg determined to be the optimal dose enabling multiple treatments per manufactured cell line. Products had variable transduction efficiencies with a median of 28.7% (range 7.4-41%), and median 19-28z CAR EBV-CTL dose was 0.7x10 6/kg (range 0.05-2.7x10 6/kg). 19-28z CAR EBV-CTL sources were primary HCT donors (n=4) and third-party donors (n=12). HLA matching between patients and donors was 10/10 (n=3), 6/10 (n=2), 5/10 (n=1), 4/10 (n=3), and 2/10 (n=7). Ten of the patients were EBV-seropositive, four were seronegative, and two were serostatus unknown. Severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity did not occur post-infusion, and no DLT was noted in the trial. Six patients developed diffuse skin rash with 3 patients' rashes deemed to be graft-versus-host disease (n=1 HLA-matched HCT donor; n=2 third-party donor), which resolved with topical steroids (n = 3). Median follow-up was 53.3 months (range 4.2-135 months) with 4 deaths due to disease progression. Overall survival of all patients was 81% at 12 months and 74% at 24 months ( Figure 1). In summation, we successfully treated 16 patients with an allogeneic, “off-the-shelf” 19-28z CAR EBV-CTL product without significant toxicity. The manufacturing platform effectively overcomes many of the limitations of autologous CAR T cell products including cost, need for patient-specific manufacturing, and life-threatening toxicity. CAR EBV-CTLs also broaden the applicability of CAR T cell therapy for patients with insufficient circulating T cells to generate autologous products. This trial determined an optimal manufacturing dose of allogeneic CAR T cells to enable repeated dosing. In the cohort of heavily pre-treated patients, long-term outcomes following multiple infusions of 19-28z CAR EBV-CTLs were excellent. Allogeneic, “off-the-shelf” CAR EBV-CTLs provide a readily available therapy for patients with limited therapeutic options, and this trial demonstrates the safety of CAR T cell infusions as consolidation after HCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01430390. Figure 1: Overall survival following 19-28z CAR EBV-CTLs of all patients by disease (A) and donor source (B).

Early Prognostic Biomarkers of Non-Relapse Mortality in Allogeneic Mismatched Unrelated Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Introduction A major challenge in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been advancing outcomes for individuals lacking a fully matched donor who require a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT. Recently, the 15-MMUD study demonstrated encouraging results for post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy)-based prophylaxis in MMUD recipients (Shaw, Jimenez, JCO 2021). Our retrospective analysis confirmed improvement in MMUD survival with PT-Cy compared to historical anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)/calcineurin-based regimens (Jimenez, Blood Adv 2022). Elevations of plasma biomarkers such as Stimulation-2 (ST2) have demonstrated increased risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and GVHD, however these have not been validated in the MMUD setting. Here, we carried out a pilot study to determine if biomarker analysis of ST2, Chemokine ligand-9 (CXCL-9), and Regenerating islet-derived 3-α (REG3α) at Day 14 (D14) and 30 (D30) can identify patients at higher risk for NRM after MMUD HCT. Methods Patients with banked samples and underwent MMUD HCT with either ATG or PT-Cy as GVHD prophylaxis at the University of Miami between 2016 - 2020 were included. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for ST2, CXCL-9, and REG3α were performed in batches on cryopreserved plasma. Descriptive statistics of demographic variables were compared using chi-squared, Fisher's exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. ST2 values were treated as continuous variables, and CXCL-9 was dichotomized due to frequent values below the lower limit of detection. Cumulative incidences of NRM were analyzed with relapse as a competing risk. Time-dependent receiver operating curves (ROC) were constructed and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) calculated. Youden's index was used to select optimum thresholds for each biomarker. Results We included 47 patients (ATG: 23; PT-Cy: 24). The PT-Cy group had more bone marrow graft representation (50% vs 22%, p = 0.04) and more donors mismatched at &amp;gt;1 HLA-locus (29% vs 0%, p&amp;lt;0.01). Median follow up was 746 days (range 44-1968). Point estimate of overall survival at 2 years was 35% (95% CI 20-61) for ATG and 71% (95% CI 55-92) for PT-Cy (p=0.02). Median overall survival was estimated at 413 days among ATG patients and could not be estimated for PT-Cy patients. The cumulative incidence of NRM at 2-years was 30% (95% CI 13-51%) for ATG and 17% (95% CI 5-35%) for PT-Cy (p=0.03). Among all patients, ST2 was prognostic for NRM using time-varying covariates including combined D14 and D30 (D14+30) with a HR of 2.14 (95% CI 1.04-4.39, p = 0.04). The D14+30 ROC to predict NRM at 1-year using ST2 showed an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.66-1). D+14 thresholded ST2 value maximizing Youden's index of ≥79.89 ng/mL was discriminative for 1-year NRM (p=0.002) (Fig. 1). Additionally, combination of CXCL-9 to ST2 could optimize the prognostic value when compared to ST2 alone: HR at D14+D30: 3.82 (95% CI 1.01-14.47, p=0.048) with an improved AUC of 0.9 (95% CI 0.79-1) (Fig. 2). REG3α did not significantly add to the AUC. Although limited by sample size, we explored the association by GVHD prophylaxis (ATG or PT-Cy). First, in the ATG group, the D14 ST2 value that maximized thresholded Youden's index of 61.39 ng/mL was predictive of 1-year NRM (p=0.04). Similarly, the D+30 ST2 values of 148.06 ng/mL was predictive of NRM (p&amp;lt;0.001). The AUC for prediction of 1-year NRM for Second, in the PT-Cy group, elevations of D30 ST2 were prognostic of 1-year NRM with HR 15.05 (95% CI 1.77-27.83, p=0.01). Consequently, the AUC for prediction of 1-year NRM for D30 ST2 was 0.92 (95% CI 0.77-1) and for ST2 + CXCL-9 was 0.96 (95% CI 0.86-1). Conclusions This pilot study suggests that after MMUD HCT, D14 and D30 biomarkers are prognostic for NRM across GVHD prophylaxis platforms. Importantly, we find that ST2 maintains its prognostic capacity in the increasingly popular PT-Cy group. This supplements what we previously reported in the haploidentical and matched unrelated donor PT-Cy setting (Kanakry, Haematologica 2017). Biomarker combination ST2 + CXCL-9 showed improved AUC over ST2 alone, and the composite D14+30 timepoint may have additive utility over a single timepoint. While the optimal time for biomarker collection is unknown, our data suggests D14 had value for ATG-treated patients, whereas D30 may be more important in the PT-Cy-treated group. A validation cohort is being assembled for PT-Cy based MMUD HCT.

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Eliminates Disparity in GvHD-Free, Relapse-Free Survival and Overall Survival between 8/8 Matched and 7/8 Mismatched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Hematologic Malignancies

Background: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has become a standard of care for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in recipients of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched and mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) allografts, generating new opportunities for successful hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) regardless of patient ancestry. The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)-sponsored 15-MMUD study, which used PTCy-based GvHD prophylaxis (PMID 3390526), demonstrated encouraging overall survival (OS) in adult patients receiving MMUD bone marrow grafts matched at ≤7/8 HLA alleles. Currently, the follow-up ACCESS study (NCT04904588) will determine if similar outcomes can be achieved using MMUD peripheral blood stem cell allografts. As part of its 5-year strategic plan, the NMDP aims to determine the extent of differences in GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) between 8/8 and 7/8 URD allografts using PTCy and seeks to develop approaches over time to close the presumed gap in URD outcomes. Methods: The primary objective was to compare GRFS between 8/8 and 7/8 URD HCT using the Center for International Blood &amp; Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database. After analyzing primary results, secondary objectives were added to compare GRFS, OS, and other clinical outcomes among 8/8 URD, 7/8 URD, and haploidentical-related donor (Haplo) HCT. The study included adult patients (age≥18y) with hematologic malignancies (ALL, AML, MDS) undergoing first URD or Haplo HCT between 2017-2020 using PTCy-based GvHD prophylaxis. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate probability of GRFS and OS. Cox regression examined the independent effect of HLA match controlling for other clinical factors on outcomes referenced to 8/8 URD HCT. A priori clinically selected factors considered as possible confounders in the regression model included disease risk index, comorbidity risk, pre-HCT Karnofsky score, conditioning regimen intensity, graft source, donor/recipient CMV serostatus, year of HCT, donor/recipient age and race/ethnicity. Final models were stratified by factors violating the proportional hazards assumption. Factors were eliminated in a backwards fashion if p-values were &amp;gt;0.10 unless inclusion affected the hazard ratio (HR) of HLA match by more than 10%. Interactions were tested against a p-value of &amp;lt;0.01. Results: Table 1 shows demographics for the three patient cohorts: Haplo (n=2772), 8/8 URD (N=1517), and 7/8 MMUD (N=540). Notable differences among the cohorts included: 8/8 URD recipients had younger, predominantly Caucasian donors and were more likely to receive myeloablative conditioning. Haplo recipients had more donor/recipient CMV seropositivity and received more reduced intensity conditioning. Otherwise patient characteristics were similar. Contrary to our expectations, multivariable regression analysis (MVA) showed no significant differences in either GRFS or OS between recipients of 8/8 and 7/8 URD HCT at 1, 2 and 3-years post-HCT ( Figure 1). Outcomes, including relapse and NRM, between 8/8 and 7/8 URD HCT were similar irrespective of conditioning intensity. However, 8/8 URD HCT associated with lower two-year moderate/severe chronic GvHD than 7/8 URD [1.30 (1.00-1.68), p=0.049]. We next compared GRFS and OS among 8/8 and 7/8 URD and Haplo at 3y after HCT. On MVA, GRFS [HR 1.15 (1.04-1.26), p=0.005] and OS [HR 1.15 (1.03-1.29), p=0.013] were significantly better in 8/8 URD compared to Haplo HCT. Differences between 8/8 URD and Haplo appeared to be driven by significantly higher NRM [HR 1.46 (1.22-1.74), p&amp;lt;0.001)] and two-year moderate/severe chronic GvHD [HR 1.28 (1.07-1.54), p=0.007] in Haplo. No significant differences were seen in GRFS or OS at 3 years when comparing 7/8 URD to Haplo. Causes of death among donor types were similar with primary disease relapse/progression, infection and organ failure being the most frequent. Conclusions: Use of PTCy-based GvHD prophylaxis seems to have resolved previously observed differences in GRFS and OS between 8/8 and 7/8 URD HCT. HCT using an 8/8 URD HCT, if available, continues to be the best option for patients lacking a matched sibling donor. Further studies comparing Haplo to 7/8 URD HCT are warranted, but will require larger numbers of 7/8 URD HCT. Both mismatched donor sources substantially increase access to HCT for patients regardless of their ancestry.