On November 9, 2000, sixteen of twenty-two defendants were convicted in Gonai'ves, Haiti, for their participation in an April 1994 massacre at Raboteau, poor seaside community in Gonaives. A week later, thirtyseven more defendants were convicted in absentia, including leaders of 1991-94 military dictatorship, which followed military coup, and heads of paramilitary group FRAPH (Revolutionary Front for Haitian Advancement and Progress, later renamed Revolutionary Armed Front for Progress of Haiti). The United Nations lauded Raboteau trial as landmark, longest and most complex [trial] in Haiti's history, and a huge step forward for Haitian justice system (United Nations Commission on Human Rights 2000). Scholars have also described Raboteau trial as most important human rights trial in Haiti (Farmer 2005, 80) and the single successful attempt to partially cleanse country of terror of 1991 coup d'etat (Fatton 2002, 155). During trial, two massacre survivors, Rosiane Profil and Deborah Charles, provided some of most spectacular testimony for prosecution, their eyewitness descriptions of events on day of massacre and display of their dramatically visible scars compelling counterevidence against defendants' accounts of massacre. Their testimony also buttressed prosecution's contention that junta violently attacked entire community as part of their campaign of systematic repression. Drawing from research for documentary on trial that I coproduced, in this essay I examine women's court testimony alongside alternative, communal testimony, especially in protest songs circulating in less authorized sites: demonstrations, sit-ins, and commemoration marches (Cynn and Hirshorn 2003). I argue that failing to supplement Charles and Profil's gendered representation as political in official record with this alternative testimony risks reinforcing gendering of women as passive and helpless individual victims, ignoring radical dimensions of their claims, and reproducing violent erasures that women sought to resist. Haitian women had participated in revolution and occasionally had been targets of state violence, but prior to Duvaliers' regime (1957-86) they were regarded, like children and elderly, as dependents-political innocents subject to special protection (Trouillot 1989, 166-67). Not permitted to vote until 1950 and classified as legal minors until 1979, women contributed to nation as reproducers of male national subjects, as mothers and wives, with legal marriage and economic dependence on husbands operating as markers of class and social status that were closely linked with national identity (Schiller and Fouron 2001, 134-35). Violence instituted by Francois Duvalier during his 1957-71 dictatorship transformed social and family relations and redefined conceptions of women as political innocents. Women were no longer protected qua women from state repression, but subjected to indiscriminate gendered violence-rape and sexualized torture-in retribution for their own activism, as well as that of their male relatives and acquaintances (Trouillot 1989,166-67; Charles 1995,139). The system of violent repression and terror implemented by Duvalier and his paramilitary force, Tonton Makout, has become emblematic; in context of Africa, Achille Mbembe uses term tonton makoutization to index excesses of corruption and coercion of new institutions charged with administering to found or shore up authoritarian regimes (2001, 83). However, as Carolle Charles argues, Duvalierist violence directed against women had paradoxical effect of politicizing women. Duvalierism effectively suppressed any independent women's movement, but Haitian women who were exiled in diaspora formed organizations influenced by anti-imperialist struggles and North American women's movement (1995, 140, 146-47). …
Read full abstract