Hector Battifora Mesothelial-1 Research Articles

Galectin-3 and Hector Battifora Mesothelial-1 immunohistochemical expression in 50 cases of thyroid neoplasms: a retrospective study done at tertiary care centre

Galectin-3 and Hector Battifora Mesothelial-1 immunohistochemical expression in 50 cases of thyroid neoplasms: a retrospective study done at tertiary care centre

Relationships of BRAF V600E Gene Mutation With Some Immunohistochemical Markers and Recurrence Rate in Patients With Thyroid Carcinoma.

The B-type rafkinase (BRAF) V600E gene mutation plays an important role in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis of thyroid carcinoma. This study was conducted to investigate the rate of the BRAF V600E mutation, the relationships between the BRAF V600E gene mutation and some immunohistochemical markers, and recurrence rate in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. The study was conducted by a descriptive and longitudinal follow-up method on 102 thyroid carcinoma patients at 103 Military Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam. All patients were identified with the BRAF V600E gene mutation by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The rate of BRAF V600E gene mutation in patients with thyroid cancer was 60.8%. Patients with BRAF V600E gene mutation had a significantly higher rate of positive cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and Ki67 markers than those without the mutation (COX-2: odds ratio [OR] = 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-6.74, P = .011; Ki67: OR = 3.41; 95% CI = 1.31-8.88, P = .01). A statistically significant relationship was identified between the rate of BRAF V600E mutation and the rate of positive Hector Battifora mesothelial 1 (HBME-1) (B = -1.040; P = .037) and COX-2 (B = -1.123; P = .023) markers. The recurrence rate in patients with BRAF V600E gene mutation was significantly higher than that in those without the mutation (P = .007). The mean of the recurrence time of patients with BRAF V600E mutation was significantly lower than that in those without the mutation (P = .011). A high prevalence of BRAF V600E gene mutation was found in thyroid carcinoma patients. The rates of positive HBME-1, COX-2, and Ki67 markers were significantly correlated to BRAF V600E gene mutation. Patients with BRAF V600E gene mutation showed a significantly higher relapse rate and earlier relapse time than those without the mutation.

The Utility of Galectin-3 and HBME-1 Immunohistochemical Expression in Thyroid Cancer in the Maltese Population

Diagnosing thyroid carcinoma is not always easy on basic haemtoxylin and eosin staining since nuclear features are inconsistent and controversial. In view of this, studies on the role of immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid carcinoma are necessary. Proposed immunohistochemical markers for papillary thyroid cancer include Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1), and Galectin-3 (Gal-3) which have been studied in this project. Immunohistochemical staining of fifty-eight formalin-fixed paraffin embedded surgically removed thyroid tissue from the years 2008 and 2013 was undertaken to determine the diagnostic accuracy of these two markers. We have concluded that both Gal-3 and HBME-1 are useful markers to aid in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma and also in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of Gal-3 over the 2years studied was found to be 96.2% and 92.6%, respectively, whilst HBME-1 was found to have sensitivity of 93.6% and specificity of 69.02%.

Immune characterization of thyroid neoplasm's and its variants using immunohistochemical markers: CK-19, Galectin-3 and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1

BackgroundNodular lesions of the thyroid are amongst the common palpable lesions that are encountered by the pathologists in the fine needle aspiration clinics and not only aspiration smears, but even biopsy sections pose significant challenges in their characterization and further classification. Neoplastic lesions of the thyroid have shown a steady rise worldwide and are diagnosed at age younger than most other cancers. Histopathology remains the gold standard in diagnosis and classification of thyroid neoplasms, with variable sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical markers, also attributed to variation in the inclusion criteria. We classified the thyroid neoplasms based on WHO Classification (2017) and aimed to study the diagnostic utility of immunohistochemical markers - CK-19, Galectin-3 and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 performed on manual tissue microarray sections to differentiate various variants of papillary carcinoma from its mimickers, specifically follicular patterned papillary neoplasms from other follicular patterned lesions. MethodProspective study of neoplastic lesions of thyroid from July 2018 to August 2020. Authors describe the clinico-radiological, cytological, histo-morphological and immunohistochemical features of neoplastic nodular lesions of the thyroid. ResultsProspective analysis of nodular thyroid lesions yielded 76 cases, of which 38 were neoplastic. Cytology showed discordance in 10/24 cases, amongst the discordant cases, 70% were confirmed as papillary carcinoma. CK-19 showed high expression in all variants of papillary carcinomas (24/24), low expression in well differentiated tumor of uncertain malignant potential (WD-TUMP) and medullary carcinoma. It was negative in follicular and Hurthle cell neoplasms. Galectin-3 showed 100% specificity and HBME-1 showed 100% sensitivity in diagnosis of papillary carcinoma and its variants. Adenomatoid nodules did not express Gal-3 which helped in their differentiation from FVPTC. ConclusionsGal-3 in combination either with CK-19 or HBME-1 improves the sensitivity and specificity of detection of papillary carcinoma, its variants and its differentiation from follicular patterned lesions to 100% with a significant p value.

Application of Thyroid Peroxidase (TPO) and Hector Battifora Mesothelial-1 (HBME-1) immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma of the thyroid

Background: Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy accounting for >90% of malignancies of endocrine glands. The inter and intraobserver variation in the histomorphological diagnosis of Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas may sometimes pose a diagnostic difficulty. Application of IHC biomarkers may play an active or complementary role in their accurate classification. Aim: The present study was conducted to evaluate if HBME-1 and TPO immunohistochemical analysis can reliably differentiate papillary carcinomas from other thyroid lesions. Material and Methods: 50 cases of benign and malignant thyroid lesions were taken. Immunohistochemical staining for HBME-1 and TPO was performed. HBME-1 and TPO score was interpreted as absent and positive. Medical records were retrieved and their clinical data, surgical treatment, and pathological findings were noted. Results: Out of 50 cases, 19 (73.1%) cases were diagnosed PTC, 4 (15.4%) cases were FTC, 3(11.5%) cases were of MTC and 24 cases of benign thyroid lesions. TPO expression was found positive in 91.7% of cases of Benign thyroid lesions. In malignant thyroid lesions, negative expression of TPO was seen in 63.16%, 0% and 33.33% of PTC, FCT, and MCT respectively. HBME-1 showed negative expression in 83.3% of cases of benign thyroid lesions. Whereas, in malignant thyroid lesion HBME-1 expression was positive in 78.95%, 50% and 0% cases of PTC, FCT, and MCT respectively. Conclusion: Testing for expression of HBME-1 has been shown to improve the diagnostic accuracy for thyroid malignant nodules. The combination of HBME-1, and TPO may contribute to an accurate diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Histological and immunohistochemical analyses of splenic epidermoid cysts

Splenic epidermoid cyst (SEC) is a rare condition. We aimed to evaluate the immunohistochemical profiles of the epithelial lining of SECs. A total of 7 SEC cases were analyzed: 2 cases involved a monolayered epithelial lining and 5 cases involved a multilayered epithelial lining. Among the multilayered SECs, the superficial/luminal layer showed mucin 4 (MUC4), cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), and CK7 expression in 5 cases (100%); MUC1, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA19-9, and thrombomodulin expression in 4 cases (80%); Wilms' tumor-1 (WT-1) and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1) expression in 2 cases (40%), but it did not express p63 or D2-40. The basal layer expressed MUC1, CK5/6, p63, and thrombomodulin in 5 cases (100%); CK7 and WT-1 in 4 cases (80%); D2-40 in 3 cases (60%); CA19-9 and HBME-1 in 2 cases (40%) and MUC4 in 1 case (20%) but it did not express CEA. The analysis showed that all cases of multilayered SECs were negative for MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CK20, calretinin, uroplakin-II, and uroplakin-III. Both cases of monolayered SECs expressed CK5/6, CK7, HBME-1, WT-1, and thrombomodulin but not MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC6, p63, CEA, CK20, CA19-9, D2-40, uroplakin-II, or uroplakin-III. One case of monolayered SEC expressed MUC1 and calretinin. Our findings indicate that monolayered SECs have mesothelial-like characteristics, whereas multilayered SECs have glandular and squamous-like characteristics besides mesothelial-like characteristics. Furthermore, monolayered SECs may develop from mesothelial inclusion and monolayered SECs develop squamous and glandular metaplasia, which results in multilayered SECs.

Diagnostic value of HBME-1, CK19, Galectin 3, and CD56 in the subtypes of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Our aim is to explore differences in Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1), cytokeratin-19 (CK19), Galectin-3 (Gal-3), and CD56 expression in infiltrative follicular variants of papillary carcinoma (IFVPTC) and encapsulated follicular variants of papillary carcinoma (EFVPTC) and to provide clues for distinguishing the two subtypes preoperatively. Tissue microarrays from 100 EFVPTC (45 non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) and 55 invasive EFVPTCs), 43 IFVPTCs, and 64 follicular neoplasms (FN) were immunostained with HBME-1, CK19, Gal-3, and CD56. Each case was scored 1 point for every positive result. Immunohistochemical expression was not significantly different in invasive EFVPTC and NIFTP, except for that of HBME-1. HBME-1, CK19, Gal-3, and CD56 expression were significantly higher in IFVPTC than in EFVPTC. At the cutoff of 3 points, the score method had special diagnostic value for differentiating IFVPTC from EFVPTC and FN and for predicting lymph node metastasis. Scoring of immunohistochemistry results may be applied to core biopsy or cell blocks to assist ultrasonographic, cytologic and molecular tests in differentiating IFVPTC and EFVPTC preoperatively, possibly appropriately guiding EFVPTC preoperatively for limited operation or active surveillance.

Value of cytokeratin-19, Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 and galectin-3 immunostaining in the diagnosis of thyroid neoplasms.

BACKGROUND:Diagnosis of types and aggressiveness of thyroid cancers is difficult. The “gold standard” in diagnosis is using routine hematoxylin and eosin staining. Several markers have been investigated for differentiating them among which cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), Hector Battifora mesothelial cell (HBME-1), and galectin-3 are found to be most commonly used. Most studies have evaluated the single expression of markers in various thyroid lesions.AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:To know the value of immunohistochemical expression of CK-19, HBME-1, and galectin-3 in diagnosing thyroid neoplasms. To study the expression and compare the results of HBME-1, CK-19, and galectin-3 immunohistochemical markers in histopathologically diagnosed malignant lesions and nonmalignant lesions and demonstrate their usefulness in differentiating them.MATERIALS AND METHODS:A prospective study was carried out on thyroidectomy specimens sent in 10% buffered formalin to Department of Pathology, SVIMS, Tirupati, from May 2013 to August 2014. Sensitivity and specificity for each marker and their combination in diagnosis were calculated.RESULTS:Among 120 cases, nonmalignant lesions were 70 (58.33%) and malignant lesions 50 (41.67%). Among nonmalignant lesions, 65 (93%) were adenomatous goiter and 5 (7%) were follicular adenomas. In malignant lesions, 48 (96%) were papillary carcinoma and 1 (2%) each of follicular carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma. Among papillary carcinomas, classical were 26 (54.16%) followed by 17 follicular variant (35.41%). Galectin-3 had highest sensitivity of 90% and HBME-1 had highest specificity of 97.14%.CONCLUSIONS:Panel of HBME-1+ galectin-3 or CK-19, HBME-1, and galectin-3 increase the accuracy of diagnosis in histopathologically difficult cases.

Histologic and immunohistochemical identification of cribriform adenocarcinoma

To assess whether tumors originally classified as adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (Adca-NOS), adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), and polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA) could be reclassified as cribriform adenocarcinoma of the tongue and minor salivary gland (CATMSG). Tumors diagnosed between 1992 and 2014 at Oral Pathology Laboratory, Inc. (New York Presbyterian Hospital) were selected. Each tumor was reviewed by 3 oral pathologists to confirm the diagnosis of CATMSG. After review, 11 of 70 Adca-NOS, 5 of 38 ACCs, and 5 of 23 PLGAs met the histologic criteria for CATMSG. One case diagnosed as CATMSG in 2014 was used as a control, and the following stains were completed: epithelial membrane antigen, Hector battifora mesothelial-1, p16, and CAM 5.2. Eleven Adca-NOS, 2 ACCs (tissue was available for only 2 of the 5 adenoid cystic carcinoma cases), and 5 PLGAs underwent immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Positive HMBE-1, p16, and CAM 5.2 staining along with negative staining for epithelial membrane antigen were considered supportive of a diagnosis of CATMSG. Based on histologic features and IHC results, we were able to reclassify 10 tumors (8 Adca-NOS and 2 PLGA) as CATMSG. CATMSG should be distinguished from other salivary gland tumors with similar histologic features. The diagnosis of CATMSG can be made on hematoxylin and eosin staining alone, but IHC analysis can be useful for confirmation.

Correlations Between Hector Battifora Mesothelial-1 (HBME-1) Expression and Clinical Pathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Osteosarcoma Patients.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1) expression and the clinical pathological characteristics and prognosis of osteosarcoma (OS).Material/MethodsHBME-1 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry in OS tissues (n=152), osteochondroma tissues (n=91), and normal bone tissues (n=74). We carried out a follow-up lasting 8–60 months to investigate HBME-1 expression and its correlations with the clinical pathological characteristics and prognosis of OS.ResultsHBME-1 was highly expressed in OS tissues compared with osteochondroma tissues and normal bone tissues, and was highly expressed in osteochondroma tissues compared with normal bone tissues (all P<0.05). HBME-1 expression was correlated with clinical stages, postoperative recurrence, metastasis, and 5-year survival (all P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of HBME-1 expression was 0.864, with sensitivity of 80.92%, specificity of 91.89%, and accuracy of 84.51%. The survival rate was lower in the HBME-1 positive expression group than the HBME-1 negative expression group (P<0.05). Clinical stages, metastasis, and HBME-1 expression were independent risk factors for the survival of patients with OS (all P<0.05).ConclusionsHBME-1 expression was correlated with the occurrence and development of OS. HBME-1 positive expression was a risk factor for the prognosis of OS.

The Potential Diagnostic Utility of TROP-2 in Thyroid Neoplasms.

Objectives:Human trophoblast cell-surface marker (TROP-2) has been reported to be overexpressed in various human carcinomas (CAs) and suggested to be a prognostic marker for some CAs. The diagnostic utility of TROP-2 in CAs has not been explored.Methods:Immunohistochemical evaluation of TROP-2 expression on tissue microarray sections of 136 thyroid neoplasms, surgical specimens of 61 atypical thyroid follicular-patterned lesions [including 33 papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs), 17 atypical follicular neoplasms (AFNs), and 11 adenomatoid nodules with focal nuclear atypia (ANFNA)], and 20 benign thyroid lesions, as well as 10 cytology specimens of PTCs was performed. For comparison, immunoassay for Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1), galectin-3, and cytokeratin 19 was performed on the 61 atypical thyroid follicular-patterned lesions.Results:Strong membranous staining with TROP-2 was seen in 94% (33/35) of classic PTCs and 81% (30/37) of confirmed follicular variant PTCs on tissue microarray and routine surgical sections, as well as 100% (10/10) of PTCs on cytology specimens; it was not observed in follicular adenomas (n=51) or CAs (n=37), AFNs or ANFNA (n=28), benign (n=20) or normal (n=15) thyroid tissue. In contrast, the expression of HBME-1 and galectin-3 was identified in 100% (33/33) of surgical cases of PTCs and in 57% (16/28) and 50% (14/28) of AFNs and ANFNA, respectively.Conclusions:Our findings demonstrate that a membranous TROP-2 staining pattern is highly specific for PTC, which may serve as a potential diagnostic marker aiding in the accurate classification of morphologically equivocal thyroid follicular-patterned lesions.

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 is a sensitive and diagnostically useful immunohistochemical marker of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and of PTC-like nuclear alterations in Hashimoto's thyroiditis.

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) is important in the progression of inflammatory responses. Recently, increased levels of ICAM-1 have been reported in a number of types of malignancy. The present study aimed to investigate ICAM-1 expression in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and in Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) with PTC-like nuclear alterations, and to assess the predictive value of ICAM-1 in thyroid lesions. ICAM-1 expression was retrospectively investigated in 132 consecutive cases of PTC, 72 cases of HT, 10 of follicular cancer, 15 of follicular adenoma, 16 of nodular goiter and 8 samples of normal thyroid tissue using immunohistochemical analyses, and in 42 PTC patients using western blotting. ICAM-1 expression was not detected in normal follicular cells, follicular lesions (adenoma and cancer) and benign nodular hyperplasia, but was frequently overexpressed in PTC cells. ICAM-1 overexpression was associated with extra-thyroidal invasion and lymph node metastasis; no association was found with age, gender, tumor size, multifocality, pathological stage, recurrence or distant metastasis. ICAM-1 expression in HT patients with PTC-like nuclear alterations was significantly higher than that in HT cases with non-PTC-like features. Compared with antibodies against cytokeratin 19, galectin-3 and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1, ICAM-1 was the most sensitive marker for the detection of PTC-like features in HT. These findings demonstrate that ICAM-1 expression is upregulated in PTC and in HT with PTC-like nuclear alterations. This feature may be an important factor in the progression of cancer of the thyroid gland.

The Diagnostic Usefulness of HMGA2, Survivin, CEACAM6, and SFN/14-3-3 δ in Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma.

Background:Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) is the second most common thyroid malignancy and its differential diagnosis includes follicular adenoma (FA) and adenomatous goiter (AG). Several ancillary markers have been suggested to aid in the diagnosis of FTC, but the successful use of these methods still needs to be validated.Methods:In the present study, we verified the immunoexpression of HMGA2, CEACAM6, survivin, and SFN/14-3-3 δ in lesions including 41 AGs, 72 FAs, and 79 FTCs. We evaluated their diagnostic usefulness, combined with galectin 3, Hector Battifora mesothelial 1 (HBME1), cytokeratin 19, and cyclin D1, in diagnosing FTC.Results:The expressions of HBME1 (65.8%) and HMGA2 (55.7%) were significantly higher in FTCs than in FAs and AGs (p<.001 and p=.005, respectively). HBME1 was the only marker that was more frequently expressed in FTCs than in FAs (p=.021) and it was more frequently expressed in follicular neoplasms than in AGs (p<.001). Among the novel markers, the combination of HMGA2 and HBME1 showed the highest sensitivity (72.2%) and specificity (76.1%) for diagnosing FTC. CEACAM6, survivin, and SFN/14-3-3 δ were barely expressed in most cases.Conclusions:Our present results show that only HMGA2 can be beneficial in differentiating FTC using the novel markers.

Immunohistochemical expression of HBME-1 and galectin-3 in the differential diagnosis of follicular-derived thyroid nodules

BackgroundThyroid nodules are common among adults with only a small percentage being malignant and histologically mimic benign nodules. Accurate diagnosis of these thyroid nodules is critical for the proper clinical management. The determination of malignancy in follicular patterned thyroid lesions is based on postoperative histological findings. Therefore, affected patients are referred for surgery, although only 10% will have a final diagnosis of malignancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of two immunohistochemical (IHC) markers; galectin-3 and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1) individually or in combination, to distinguish between benign (non-neoplastic and neoplastic) and malignant (follicular and papillary carcinomas) thyroid lesions removed by surgical resection. MethodsWe investigated the immunoexpression of galectin-3 and HBME-1 in 50 cases of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The benign group included 13 cases of thyroid nodular goiter (NG) and 9 cases of follicular adenoma (FA). The malignant group included 5 cases of follicular thyroid carcinomas (FC), 18 cases of classic papillary thyroid carcinoma and 5 cases of follicular variant papillary carcinoma (FVPC). ResultsThe staining results showed that malignant tumors expressed galectin-3 and HBME-1 significantly more than benign nodules. The sensitivity of these markers for the distinction between benign and malignant lesions ranged from 89.3% to 92.9%. Co-expression of galectin-3 and HBME-1 was seen in 82.1% of carcinomas, but in none of the benign nodules. Immunoexpression was usually diffuse in malignant tumors, and focal in the benign lesions. ConclusionOur findings indicate that these immunohistochemical markers are significantly more expressed in malignant tumors compared to benign lesions and may be of additional diagnostic value when combined with routine histology. Galectin-3 has higher sensitivity and specificity of immunoexpression in thyroid malignancy than HBME-1, and the combined use of galectin-3 and HBME-1 can increase the specificity of immunoexpression in malignant tumors.

Usefulness of Cytokeratin-19, Galectin-3, and Hector Battifora Mesothelial-1 in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules

Having been asymptomatic, most thyroid nodules are found incidentally. In the absence of a specific diagnostic marker of malignant thyroid nodules, it is difficult to microscopically diagnose the benign or malignant nature of nodules. In the present study, the goal is to investigate the expression of cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), galectin-3 (Gal-3), and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1) in thyroid nodules, and to assess their diagnostic value as markers in the differential diagnoses of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Conventional Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embeded blocks of 150 cases of benign and malignant thyroid lesions. The benign group included 28 cases of follicular adenoma (FA) and 44 cases of thyroid nodular goiter. The malignant group included 72 cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and 6 cases of follicular thyroid carcinomas (FTC). It was statistically found that there were strikingly significant differences for the three markers in the distinguishing diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules (p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences for the expression of the three markers among two different subtypes in the malignant group. What is more, no significant relationship was found between the expression of CK-19, Gal-3, or HBME-1 and gender, age, tumor size, focal lymphocytic infiltration, or lymph node metastasis in thyroid nodules. The combined use of CK19, Gal-3, and HBME-1 is of practical value in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Expression of ck-19, galectin-3 and hbme-1 in the differentiation of thyroid lesions: systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

BackgroundTo distinguish between malignant and benign lesions of the thyroid gland histological demonstration is often required since the fine-needle aspiration biopsy method applied pre-operatively has some limitations. In an attempt to improve diagnostic accuracy, markers using immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry techniques have been studied, mainly cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), galectin-3 (Gal-3) and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1). However, current results remain controversial. The aim of the present article was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of CK-19, Gal-3 and HBME-1 markers, as well as their associations, in the differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid lesions.MethodsA systematic review of published articles on MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library was performed. After establishing inclusion and exclusion criteria, 66 articles were selected. The technique of meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was employed and global values of sensitivity, specificity, area under the summary ROC curve, and diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) were calculated.ResultsFor the immunohistochemistry technique, the positivity of CK-19 for the diagnosis of malignant thyroid lesions demonstrated global sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 73%; for Gal-3, sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 81%; and for HBME-1, sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 83%. The association of the three markers determined sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 97%, and diagnostic odds ratio of 95.1. Similar results were also found for the immunocytochemistry assay.ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated that the three immunomarkers studied are accurate in pre- and postoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid lesions. Nevertheless, the search for other molecular markers must continue in order to enhance this diagnostic accuracy since the results found still show a persistency of false-negative and false-positive tests.Virtual slidesHttp://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/3436263067345159

Expression of CK-19, galectin-3, and HBME-1 in the differentiation of thyroid lesions: Systematic review and DIAGNOSTIC meta-analysis.

e21151 Background: The distinction between malignant and benign lesions of the thyroid gland often requires histological demonstration, once the fine-needle aspiration biopsy method applied pre-operatively has some limitations. In an attempt to improve diagnostic accuracy, markers have been studied by immunocyto- and immunohistochemistry techniques, mainly cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), galectin-3 (Gal-3) and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1). However, current results remain controversial. The aim of the present article was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of CK-19, Gal-3 and HBME-1 markers, as well as their associations, in the differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid lesions. Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE’s published articles was performed. After establishing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 65 articles were selected. The technique of meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was employed, and global values of sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) were calculated. Results: The positivity ofCK-19 for the diagnosis of malignant thyroid lesions demonstrated sensitivity of 81% (IC95%: 79-83%), specificity of 73% (IC95%: 70-75%), AUC of 87,5% and dOR of 14,7 (IC95%: 8,2-26,4); for Gal-3, sensitivity of 82% (IC95%: 81-84%), specificity of 81% (IC95%: 79-82%), AUC of 90% and dOR of 23,4 (IC95%: 14,0-39,1); and for HBME-1, sensitivity of 77% (IC95%: 76-79%), specificity of 83% (IC95%: 82-85%), AUC of 92,8% and dOR of 41,0 (IC95%: 21,4-78,4). The association of the three markers determined sensitivity of 85% (IC95%: 78-90%), specificity of 97% (IC95%: 90-99%), AUC of 93,3% and dOR of 95,1 (IC95%: 25,2-359,1). Conclusions: The search for new molecular markers must continue in order to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the differentiation between malignant and benign lesions of the thyroid gland, since the results found still show persistency of false-negative and false-positive tests.

Comparative Analysis of Protein Expression in Differentiated Thyroid Tumours: A Multicentre Study

This study compared clinical features and protein expression profiles in differentiated thyroid tumours to identify protein markers with the potential for indicating malignancy status. Tissue microarrays were constructed using 119 thyroid tumour samples (45 papillary carcinomas, 26 follicular carcinomas, 48 adenomas). Generally, there was overexpression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), p53, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1), MMP-2, pituitary tumour-transforming gene (PTTG) and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in malignant thyroid carcinomas, and overexpression of fragile histidine triad (FHIT), p16 and E-cadherin in thyroid adenomas. Multiple factor binary logistic regression analysis indicated that MMP-2, HBME-1, p16 and FHIT were independently related to differentiated thyroid tumours. Receiver-operating characteristics for these four factors showed HBME-1 as best for diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity and specificity were enhanced using an HBME-1 and p16 cluster. HBME-1 expression was not significantly different for papillary and follicular carcinomas, whereas p16 expression was significantly specific.

Combined immunostaining with galectin-3, fibronectin-1, CITED-1, Hector Battifora mesothelial-1, cytokeratin-19, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, and sodium/iodide symporter antibodies for the differential diagnosis of non-medullary thyroid carcinoma

The microscopic distinction between benign and malignant thyroid lesions in clinical practice is still largely based on conventional histology. This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of galectin-3 (Gal-3), Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1), cytokeratin (CK)-19, CBP P300-interacting transactivator with glutamic acid E- and aspartic acid D-rich C-terminal domain (CITED-1), fibronectin (FN)-1, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma, and intracellular sodium/iodide symporter (iNIS) immunostaining in a large panel of thyroid neoplasms. Our study differed from earlier ones with regard to the identification of optimal semiquantitative cut-off levels using receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. We used tissue arrays containing 177 thyroid tissues: 100 benign tissues (including normal thyroid, Graves disease, multinodular goiter, and follicular adenoma (FA)) and 77 thyroid carcinomas (including papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), follicular thyroid carcinoma, and follicular variant of PTC (FVPTC)). Antibody staining was scored semiquantitatively based on the ROC analyses and with hierarchical cluster analysis. In general, we found overexpression of FN-1, CITED-1, Gal-3, CK-19, HBME-1, and iNIS in malignant thyroid lesions. Gal-3, FN-1, and iNIS had the highest accuracy in the differential diagnosis of follicular lesions. A panel of Gal-3, FN-1, and iNIS, identified by hierarchical cluster analysis, had a 98% accuracy to differentiate between FA and malignant thyroid lesions. In addition, HBME-1 was found to be useful in the differentiation between FA and FVPTC (accuracy 88%). We conclude that identifying optimal antibody panels with cluster analysis increases the diagnostic value in the differential diagnosis of thyroid neoplasms, the combination of FN-1, Gal-3, and iNIS having the best accuracy (98%).