Many construction products are in contact with, e.g., rain and seepage water during their service life. As a result, they may leach and release potentially harmful substances into the environment. Harmonized laboratory tests are available to assess the potential environmental impact, but the evaluation of leaching test results remains challenging because releases found in laboratory experiments cannot be directly extrapolated to field conditions. Particularly complex is the case of irrigated and therefore intermittently wetted components. This paper presents the leaching results of a one-year outdoor irrigation of a fly ash concrete doped with heavy metals (arsenic, lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, thallium, vanadium, and zinc). The results are compared with those of two other outdoor irrigation studies: a high-density concrete and a facing masonry mortar. Two modeling approaches, a statistical method by Weiler et al. and a thermodynamic model of Vega Garcia et al. are used to model the incremental and cumulative releases and to compare their applicability and predictive value. The experimental data of this work confirm the well-known fact that cementitious phases effectively incorporate many potentially environmentally harmful substances. However, increased leaching, particularly outdoors, is observed for the oxyanion-forming elements arsenic, chromium, vanadium, and sulfur. Both models seem sufficient for depicting and, in the case of statistics, also to predict the magnitude of the measured values. However, while the statistical approach focuses only on the results and requires further verification data and factor development for different materials, the thermodynamic approach describes the geochemical processes and therefore requires more background knowledge of the operator; it also lacks predictive accuracy for the irrigation case. Further research is needed.
Read full abstract