A 3-year study using arrays of artificial refuges to survey for reptiles was carried out on a 20-ha area of mature Calluna heathland in Wareham Forest, south Dorset, UK, between 1993 and 1995. During each of the three years different arrays were used, each duplicated, to investigate the relationships between reptile numbers and array area, refuge number and refuge density. A total of 18 arrays was used with a range in area of 0.335-0.597 ha, a range in refuge number per array of 7-127 and a range of refuge densities of 14-378 ha -1 . Arrays were checked for the presence of reptiles either 25 (1994 and 1995) or 28 (1993) times during the period March/April-October by walking a pre-determined transect route (range: 150-731 ml) visiting each refuge in turn. Individuals of all three snake species were uniquely marked using PIT (Passive Integrated Transponder) tags. During the study 321 smooth snake, 44 grass snake, six adder, 96 sand lizard, 286 slow worm and one common lizard observations were recorded. The majority of smooth snakes (96%), grass snakes (86%) and slow worms (99%) were found beneath refuges, whilst the majority of sand lizards (75%) and the single common lizard were found in the open between refuges (transect walk). Adders were found equally under refuges or in the open. The total number of snake observations represented 77 individual smooth snakes (71 PIT-tagged, six juveniles), 25 individual grass snakes and four individual adders. The total number of smooth snake and sand lizard captures/sightings showed logarithmic relationships with refuge number and refuge density such that at refuge numbers of 37 array -1 and refuge densities of 80-120 ha -1 they levelled off, indicating that these two species were probably resident within the study area. Similar logarithmic relationships for grass snake and slow worm captures showed no levelling off. This indicated that the grass snake, a free-ranging species, could not be considered a resident of the study area, whilst the slow worm, a sedentary species, although a resident, was probably not adequately 'sampled' by the range of refuge densities used. The findings of this study have resulted in a proposed standard method for the surveying of reptiles on dry lowland heath that would enable comparisons to be made both between sites and within sites over time. Thus, with the exception of the sand lizard, for which transect walks resulted in the most sightings, lowland heath should be surveyed for smooth snakes, grass snakes and slow worms using hexagonal arrays of 37 artificial refuges spaced 10m apart, and visited throughout the year between April and October, but with most effort being concentrated in May, June and September. The ability to manage successfully sites known to contain reptiles will be enhanced by the application of the results of this study to the determination of reptile presence and abundance.