Development, Growth & DifferentiationVolume 61, Issue 2 p. 198-199 ERRATUMFree Access Erratum This article corrects the following: Proteasome activity determines pupation timing through the degradation speed of timer molecule Blimp-1 Hamdy Aly, Kazutaka Akagi, Hitoshi Ueda, Volume 60Issue 8Development, Growth & Differentiation pages: 502-508 First Published online: October 18, 2018 First published: 08 February 2019 https://doi.org/10.1111/dgd.12598AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat In 1, the legends of figures 2, 3, 5 and 6 are missing. Below are the correct figures with complete legends. Figure 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint 26S proteasome mutants exhibited a delay in pupation timing. Heterozygous mutants of 26S proteasome subunits and control (yw) animals were cultured at 25°C, and pupation timing was observed every 30 min. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to evaluate the differences between pupation timing and to determine p values. Prosα2G8948 line (a) was used for the α subunit mutant, Prosβ3G4206 (b) and Prosβ61 (c) were used for β subunit mutants. Av: average of pupation timing; n: number of animals examined Figure 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint FBXO11 contributes to the correct determination of pupation timing. FBXO11 mutants and control (yw) animals were cultured at 25°C, and pupation timing was observed every 30 min. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to evaluate differences between pupation timing and to determine p values. Heterozygous lines FBXO11NP2786 (a), FBXO11GS10050 (b), and homozygous line FBXO11EY09314 (c) were used. Av: average of pupation timing; n: number of animals examined Figure 5Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Rescue of pupation timing delay in FBXO11 mutant by induction of βFTZ-F1. Pupation timing of FBXO11 mutant animals with/without hs-βFTZ-F1 transgene was observed every 30 min. Non-heat shocked (a) and heat shocked (b) animals. Heat shock was given at 34°C for 1 hr at 7 hr APF. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to evaluate differences in pupation timing between test and control animals and to determine p-values. Av: average of pupation timing; n: number of animals examined Figure 6Open in figure viewerPowerPoint The fat body is responsible for the control of pupation timing by proteasome activity. Pupation timing was observed every 30 min in animals with knockdown of 20S components β6 (a, b) and α4 (c) in the fat body. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to evaluate differences between pupation timing and to determine p-values versus the RNAi/+ (a, b, c), Cg- Gal4/+ (a) or ppl-Gal4/+ (b, c) as controls. Av: average of pupation timing; n: number of animals examined We apologize for the errorr. REFERENCE 1Aly, H., Akagi, K., & Ueda, H. (2018). Proteasome activity determines pupation timing through the degradation speed of timer molecule Blimp-1. Development, Growth and Differentiation, 60, 502– 508. https://doi.org/10.1111/dgd.12569 Volume61, Issue2February 2019Pages 198-199 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation