Heat Pain Detection Threshold Research Articles

Psychophysiological and Neurophysiological Correlates of Dropping Objects from Hands in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Dropping objects from hands (DOH) is a common symptom of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We evaluated the clinical, neurophysiological, and psychophysiological features of 120 CTS patients to elucidate the DOH pathophysiology. Forty-nine healthy controls were included. In the patients, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions (DN4), and a numeric rating scale for pain (NRS) were evaluated. In patients and controls, we evaluated bilateral median and ulnar motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, cutaneous silent period and cutaneomuscular reflexes (CMR) of the abductor pollicis brevis, cold-detection threshold (CDT) and heat-pain detection threshold (HPT) at the index, little finger, and dorsum of the hand, and vibratory detection threshold at the index and little finger by quantitative sensory testing. CTS with DOH had higher BCTQ, DN4 and NRS, lower median sensory action potential, longer CMR duration, lower CDT and higher HPT at all tested sites than controls and CTS without DOH. Predictive features for DOH were abnormal CDT and HPT at the right index and dorsum (OR: 3.88, p: 0.03) or at the little finger (OR: 3.27, p: 0.04) and a DN4 higher than 4 (OR: 2.16, p < 0.0001). Thermal hypoesthesia in median and extra-median innervated territories and neuropathic pain are predictive of DOH in CTS.

Carotid atherosclerosis: An independent risk factor for small fiber nerve dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

To explore whether carotid atherosclerosis is an independent risk factor for small fiber nerve dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. A total of 247 type 2 diabetes patients from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital received carotid ultrasonography and quantitative sensory testing, including cold and warm detection thresholds, and some patients received cold and heat pain detection thresholds, respectively. According to the results of quantitative sensory testing, patients were divided into normal small fiber nerve function (NSF)and small fiber nerve dysfunction (SFD) group. Meanwhile, patients were divided into the non-carotid atherosclerosis group, carotid intimal thickening, unilateral carotid atherosclerosis and bilateral carotid atherosclerosis group. The correlation between carotid ultrasonography with quantitative sensory testing parameters was analyzed by SPSS 26.0. First, the incidence rate of SFD increased significantly in patients with carotid atherosclerosis (72.2%, P < 0.001) especially in bilateral carotid atherosclerosis (81.7%, P < 0.001). Second, compared with the NS group, the carotid intima-media thickness in SFD was thicker (P=0.018) and the size of atherosclerotic plaque was larger (P < 0.001). In addition, the cold detection threshold decreased (P < 0.001), whereas the warm detection threshold (P < 0.001) and heat pain detection threshold (P < 0.001) increased as aggravation of carotid atherosclerosis. In the correlation analysis, the size of atherosclerotic plaque presented a positive correlation with the warm detection threshold (r=0.476, P < 0.001) and heat pain detection threshold (r=0.213, P < 0.001), but presented a negative correlation with the cold detection threshold (r=-0.239, P < 0.01). Furthermore, carotid atherosclerosis (odds ratio 2.326, P=0.017), especially bilateral carotid atherosclerosis (odds ratio 5.042, P=0.001), was an independent risk factor for SFD (P < 0.05). Carotid atherosclerosis was significantly associated with quantitative sensory testing and found to be an independent risk factor for small fiber nerve dysfunction in type 2 diabetes patients.

Effects of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectations on Motor Imagery-Induced Thermal and Mechanical Hypoalgesia: A Single-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial.

The main aim of this study was to assess whether self-efficacy (SE) and outcome expectations (OEs) modulate the hypoalgesic effect induced by motor imagery (MI). A total of 75 asymptomatic participants were randomly assigned to the positive (SE+, OE+), negative (SE−, OE−) or non-expectation (CG) groups. Heat pain threshold (HPT) and pain pressure threshold (PPT) were the main variables. Cold detection threshold (CDT), warm detection threshold (WDT), heart rate (HR) and perceived fatigue were the secondary variables. The variables were assessed preintervention, immediately postintervention and 10 min postintervention, except for HR, which was measured continuously during the intervention. Regarding HPT, significant within-group pre-post differences were found in the OE+ group, with a low effect size (p = 0.01, d = −0.39). With regard to ΔPPT, significant intergroup differences were found in Δpost-pre between the SE+ and CG groups (p = 0.012, d = 1.04) and also between SE+ and OE− (p = 0.006, d = 1.08), both with a large effect size. CG, SE−, and OE− groups had poorer CDT and WDT. Regarding HR, significant intergroup differences were found in the postintervention measurement between OE+ and SE−, with a large effect size (p = 0.016, d = 1.34). Lastly, no between-group differences were found regarding perceived fatigue (p > 0.05). The results obtained showed that positive expectations have a slight influence on the increase in heat and mechanical pain detection thresholds. Positive and non-expectancy groups showed an autonomic activation. The results also showed that negative expectations led to poorer perceptual processes.

Quantitative sensory testing can effectively predict cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is one of the most serious types of diabetic autonomic neuropathy and is a class of small fibre neuropathy. Among many inspection methods, quantitative sensory testing is an effective and convenient method for diagnosing diabetic small fibre neuropathy. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the correlation between the development of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and quantitative sensory testing parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 266 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were enrolled in this study, and each of them received cardiovascular reflex tests (CARTs) and quantitative sensory testing, including testing of cold, warm, cold pain, and heat pain detection thresholds (CDT, WDT, CPT, and HPT, respectively). The results of CARTs were compared with the thermal detection thresholds in quantitative sensory testing by using SPSS 26.0. A total of 266 participants were divided into the CAN group, early CAN (ECAN) group, and without CAN (NCAN) group. There were significant differences in quantitative sensory testing parameters among three groups, and CARTs presented a positive correlation with the WDT and HPT and a negative correlation with the CDT. Moreover, after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, and other influencing factors, WDT, HPT, and CDT were independent risk factors for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy. The thermal detection thresholds, including cold, warm, and heat pain detection thresholds, in quantitative sensory testing were found to be significantly related to the results of CARTs. Some thermal detection thresholds were independent risk factors for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy. Therefore, this study showed that quantitative sensory testing has a reliable predictive ability for the occurrence and development of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy.

The relationship between alexithymia, sensory phenotype and neurophysiological parameters in patients with chronic upper limb neuropathy

In this study, we investigated the relationship between sensory abnormalities evaluated by quantitative sensory testing (QST) and alexithymia, depression and anxiety in patients with neuropathic pain involving the upper limbs. We enrolled 62 patients (34 with carpal tunnel syndrome, 7 with brachial plexopathy, 3 with cervical painful radiculopathy, 5 with ulnar entrapment neuropathy at elbow and 13 with post-burn hypertrophic scars) and 48 healthy controls. All underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS), evaluation of cold, heat pain and vibration detection threshold (VDT) by QST and evaluation of alexithymia by Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), depression by Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), anxiety by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y), level of psychological distress by 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and perceived social support by the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). The general linear model analysis revealed a significant relationship between TAS-20 overall and TAS-20 sub-score for difficulty identifying feelings and VDT z-scores in the left index with no interaction by year of education and sensory NCS results. Our results demonstrated the association between impairment of vibratory sensation of the left hand, reflecting cutaneous mechanoceptor dysfunction, and alexithymia, particularly the difficulty to identify feelings. The importance of delivering to patients with neuropathic pain personalized care that takes into account not only the neurophysiological aspects but also the aspects of mental functioning is discussed.

The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 negative allosteric modulator fenobam: pharmacokinetics, side effects, and analgesic effects in healthy human subjects.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5) has been shown to modulate nociception in animals, but no mGlu5 antagonists have been developed commercially as analgesics. The mGlu5 antagonist fenobam [N-(3-chlorophenyl)-N'-(4,5-dihydro-1-methyl-4-oxo-1H-imidazole-2-yl)urea] was originally evaluated for development as a nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic. Fenobam is analgesic in numerous mouse pain models, acting exclusively through mGlu5 blockade. Furthermore, fenobam showed no signs of analgesic tolerance with up to 2 weeks of daily dosing in mice. Analgesic effects of fenobam in humans have not been reported. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate fenobam pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects in humans. We first evaluated single-dose oral fenobam disposition in a parallel-group dose-escalation study in healthy volunteers. A second investigation tested the analgesic effects of fenobam in an established experimental human pain model of cutaneous sensitization using capsaicin cream and heat, in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. The primary outcome measure was the area of hyperalgesia and allodynia around the area applied with heat/capsaicin. Secondary outcome measures included nociception, measured as pain rating on a visual analog scale, heat pain detection threshold, and effects on cognition and mood. Fenobam plasma exposures showed considerable interindividual variability and were not linear with dose. Fenobam reduced sensitization vs placebo at a single timepoint (peak plasma concentration); we found no other difference between fenobam and placebo. Our results suggest highly variable fenobam disposition and minimal analgesic effects at the dose tested. We suggest that future studies testing analgesic effects of mGlu5 blockade are warranted, but such studies should use molecules with improved pharmacokinetic profiles.

Sensitive skin is a neuropathic disorder.

Sensitive skin is defined by the occurrence of unpleasant sensations such as tingling, burning, tautness, itching or pain. Mechanisms explaining sensitive skin are controversial, and many hypotheses have been proposed. Because sensitive skin is primarily characterized by a wide variety of neuropathic-like symptoms, it is highly likely that neurosensory dysfunction in the skin represents one of the pathological mechanisms of sensitive skin. This hypothesis does not exclude other explanations like role of keratinocyte, transient receptor potential channels, vasculature or environmental factors. Nevertheless, the role of the nervous system in the development of sensitive skin is crucial, and growing evidence supports this hypothesis. Pain and pruritus described by patients with sensitive skin correspond to neuropathic component, and its assessment shows an increase in neuropathic measures (DN-4, Douleur Neuropathique 4) compared with control. These sensations are similar to the sensations observed in small-fibre neuropathy (SFN), which is a group of disorders that affect thin nerve fibres. One study on the pathophysiology of sensitive skin demonstrated that intra-epidermal nerve fibre density, especially of peptidergic C-fibres, was lower in the sensitive skin group. A recent study showed a modification in heat-pain detection threshold in patients with sensitive skin. All these results indicate that C-fibre damage can help explain sensitive skin. Consequently, the role of the nervous system is increasingly obvious. Nevertheless, keratinocytes and other epidermal cells closely participate in sensory transduction. Therefore, the results of neurophysiological studies should be interpreted in the light of this information that the whole epidermis represents a huge polymodal nociceptor.

Reproducibility of a battery of human evoked pain models to detect pharmacological effects of analgesic drugs.

BackgroundAlthough reproducibility is considered essential for any method used in scientific research, it is investigated only rarely; thus, strikingly little has been published regarding the reproducibility of evoked pain models involving human subjects. Here, we studied the reproducibility of a battery of evoked pain models for demonstrating the analgesic effects of two analgesic compounds.MethodsA total of 81 healthy subjects participated in four studies involving a battery of evoked pain tests in which mechanical, thermal and electrical stimuli were used to measure pain detection and tolerance thresholds. Pharmacodynamic outcome variables were analysed using a mixed model analysis of variance, and a coefficient of variation was calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the least squares means.ResultsA total of 76 subjects completed the studies. After being administered pregabalin, the subjects’ pain tolerance thresholds in the cold pressor and pressure stimulation tests were significantly increased compared to the placebo group. Moreover, the heat pain detection threshold in UVB‐irradiated skin was significantly increased in subjects who were administered ibuprofen compared to the placebo group. Variation among all evoked pain tests ranged from 2.2% to 30.6%.ConclusionsFour studies using a similar design showed reproducibility with respect to the included evoked pain models. The relatively high consistency and reproducibility of two analgesics at doses known to be effective in treating clinically relevant pain supports the validity of using this pain test battery to investigate the analgesic activity and determine the active dosage of putative analgesic compounds in early clinical development.SignificanceThe consistency and reproducibility of measuring the profile of an analgesic at clinically relevant doses illustrates that this pain test battery is a valid tool for demonstrating the analgesic activity of a test compound and for determining the optimal active dose in early clinical drug development.

The ultraviolet B inflammation model: Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and validation of a reduced UVB exposure paradigm for inducing hyperalgesia in healthy subjects.

BackgroundPain models are commonly used in drug development to demonstrate analgesic activity in healthy subjects and should therefore not cause long‐term adverse effects. The ultraviolet B (UVB) model is a model for inflammatory pain in which three times the minimal erythema dose (3MED) is typically applied to induce sensitization. Based on reports of long‐lasting postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) associated with 3MED, it was decided to investigate the prevalence of PIH among subjects who were previously exposed to 3MED at our research centre. In addition, re‐evaluation of the UVB inflammation model using a reduced exposure paradigm (2MED) was performed in healthy subjects.MethodsIn the first study, all 142 subjects previously exposed to 3MED UVB were invited for a clinical evaluation of PIH. In the second study, 18 healthy subjects were exposed to 2MED UVB, and heat pain detection threshold (PDT) and PIH were evaluated.ResultsIn total, 78 of the 142 subjects responded. The prevalence of PIH among responders was 53.8%. In the second study, we found a significant and stable difference in PDT between UVB‐exposed and control skin 3 hr after irradiation; 13 hr post‐irradiation, the least squares mean estimate of the difference in PDT ranged from −2.6°C to −4.5°C (p < 0.0001). Finally, the prevalence of PIH was lower in the 2MED group compared to the 3MED group.ConclusionsThe 3MED model is associated with a relatively high prevalence of long‐lasting PIH. In contrast, 2MED exposure produces stable hyperalgesia and has a lower risk of PIH and is therefore recommended for modelling inflammatory pain.SignificancePostinflammatory hyperpigmentation is an unwanted long‐term side effect associated with the UVB inflammation model using the 3× minimal erythema dose (3MED) paradigm. In contrast, using a 2MED paradigm results in hyperalgesia that is stable for 36 hr and has a lower risk of inducing postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.

The association between areas of secondary hyperalgesia and volumes of the caudate nuclei and other pain relevant brain structures—A 3-tesla MRI study of healthy men

IntroductionCentral sensitization plays a pivotal role in maintenance of pain and is believed to be intricately involved in several chronic pain conditions. One clinical manifestation of central sensitization is secondary hyperalgesia. The degree of secondary hyperalgesia presumably reflects individual levels of central sensitization. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between areas of secondary hyperalgesia and volumes of the caudate nuclei and other brain structures involved in pain processing.Materials and methodsWe recruited 121 healthy male participants; 118 were included in the final analysis. All participants underwent whole brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prior to MRI, all participants underwent pain testing. Secondary hyperalgesia was induced by brief thermal sensitization. Additionally, we recorded heat pain detection thresholds (HPDT), pain during one minute thermal stimulation (p-TS) and results of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression score (HADS).ResultsWe found no significant associations between the size of the area of secondary hyperalgesia and the volume of the caudate nuclei or of the following structures: primary somatosensory cortex, anterior and mid cingulate cortex, putamen, nucleus accumbens, globus pallidus, insula and the cerebellum. Likewise, we found no significant associations between the volume of the caudate nuclei and HPDTs, p-TS, PCS and HADS.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that the size of the secondary hyperalgesia area is not associated with the volume of brain structures relevant for pain processing, suggesting that the propensity to develop central sensitization, assessed as secondary hyperalgesia, is not correlated to brain structure volume.

Removing own-limb visual input using mixed reality (MR) produces a “telescoping” illusion in healthy individuals

The purpose of the present study was to assess changes in body perception when visual feedback was removed from the hand and arm with the purpose of resembling the visual deprivation arising from amputation. The illusion was created by removing the visual feedback from the participants’ own left forearm using a mixed reality (MR) and green screen environment.Thirty healthy persons (15 female) participated in the study. Each subject experienced two MR conditions, one with and one without visual feedback from the left hand, and a baseline condition with normal vision of the limb (no MR). Body perception was assessed using proprioceptive drift, questionnaires on body perception, and thermal sensitivity measures (cold, warm, heat pain and cold pain detection thresholds). The proprioceptive drift showed a significant shift of the tip of the index finger (p<0.001) towards the elbow in the illusion condition (mean drift: −3.71 cm). Self-report showed a significant decrease in ownership (p<0.001), shift in perceptual distortions, (e.g. “It feels as if my lower arm has become shorter”) (p=0.025), and changes in sensations of the hand (tingling, tickling) (p=0.025). A significant decrease was also observed in cold detection threshold (p<0.001), i.e. the detection threshold was cooler than for the control conditions.The proprioceptive drift together with the self-reported questionnaire showed that the participants felt a proximal retraction of their limb, resembling the telescoping experienced by phantom limb patients. The study highlights the influence of missing visual feedback and its possible contribution to phantom limb phenomena.

Lumbar Disc Herniation, the Association Between Quantitative Sensorial Test and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.

Quantitative sensorial tests (QST) are used for evaluating specific sensorial nerve function. In this study, QST and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings are compared in lumbar disc herniation patients, and the accuracy of QST data was investigated. Sixty-four patients between 18 and 70 years of age suffering from radicular pain with positive Lasegue's test were included in this study. Specific criteria included complaints due to L5 discopathy. MRI findings were classified according to the Pfirmann grading system, and QST was applied to the L5 dermatoma of both symptomatic and nonsymptomatic legs of all patients. Vibration detection threshold, heat detection threshold, cold detection threshold, and heat pain detection threshold values were obtained, and MRI findings were classified according to the Pfirmann grading system. When we compared the symptomatic and nonsymptomatic legs of participants, there were significant differences by means of all QST parameters (0 = 0.00). In a comparison of the QST and MRI Pfirmann grading systems, there is also a strong parallel statistical correlation between the Pfirmann grade and QST parameters (P < 0.05). According to the results of our study, QST has an additive effect to MRI for nerve root compression evaluation in the clinical basis, which might enable more sensitive diagnosis and treatment protocol. QST can also be an alternative method for evaluation of nerve root compression in patients who have contraindications for MRI.

Clonidine used as a perineural adjuvant to ropivacaine, does not prolong the duration of sensory block when controlling for systemic effects: A paired, blinded, randomized trial in healthy volunteers.

BackgroundClonidine used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine have been shown to prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. The mechanism of action remains unclear. We hypothesized, that clonidine used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine extends the duration of an adductor canal block (ACB) by a peripheral mechanism, compared to ropivacaine alone when controlling for systemic effects.MethodsWe conducted a paired, blinded, randomized trial in healthy volunteers. Participants received bilateral ACBs containing 20 ml ropivacaine 0.5% + 1 ml clonidine 150μg/ml in one leg and 20 ml ropivacaine 0.5% + 1 ml saline in the other leg. The primary outcome measure was duration of sensory block assessed by temperature sensation (alcohol swab). Secondary outcome measures were duration of sensory block assessed by: pinprick, maximum pain during tonic heat stimulation, warmth detection threshold and heat pain detection threshold.ResultsWe enrolled 21 volunteers and all completed the trial. There was no difference in duration of sensory block assessed with an alcohol swab: Mean duration in the leg receiving ropivacaine + clonidine was 19.4h (SD 2.7) compared to 19.3h (SD 2.4) in the leg receiving ropivacaine + placebo with a mean difference of 0.1h (95% CI: -1.0 to 1.3), P = 0.83. No differences in block duration were detected when assessed by: Pinprick, mean difference 0.0 h (95% CI: -1.3 to 1.3), maximum pain during tonic heat stimulation, mean difference -0.7 h (95% CI: -2.1 to 0.8), warmth detection threshold, mean difference -0.1 h (95% CI: -1.8 to 1.6) or heat pain detection threshold, mean difference -0.2 h (95% CI: -1.7 to 1.4).ConclusionsAdministering clonidine perineurally as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in an ACB did not prolong the duration of sensory block in a setup controlling for systemic effects of clonidine.

Quantitative sensory tests fairly reflect immediate effects of oxycodone in chronic low-back pain

IntroductionQuantitative sensory tests (QST) can be used for profiling anti-nociceptive effects of analgesics. However, anti-nociceptive effects detected by QST are not necessarily associated with analgesic effects in pain patients. As part of a large investigation on low back pain, this paper describes the immediate analgesic and anti-nociceptive effects of oxycodone in chronic low-back pain and ranks different QST according to their ability to reflect this effect. The results are expected to support the selection of QST for future studies on potential novel opioid agonists in human pain. MethodsIn this randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blinded cross-over study, 50 patients with chronic low-back pain received a single oral dose of oxycodone 15mg or active placebo, and underwent multiple QST testing. The intensity of low-back pain was recorded during 2h. The areas under the ROC curves and 95% confidence intervals were determined, whereby responder status (≥30% pain reduction) was set as reference variable and changes in QST from baseline were set as classifiers. ResultsSignificant analgesic effect on low-back pain as well as anti-nociceptive effects for almost all QST parameters were observed. The QST with the highest area under the curve were heat pain detection threshold (0.65, 95%-CI 0.46 to 0.83), single-stimulus electrical pain threshold (0.64, 95%-CI 0.47 to 0.80) and pressure pain detection threshold (0.63, 95%-CI 0.48 to 0.79). ConclusionsThe results suggest that anti-nociceptive effects assessed by QST fairly reflect clinical efficacy of oxycodone on low-back pain. Pressure pain detection threshold, heat pain detection threshold and single-stimulus electrical pain threshold may be more suitable to sort out potential non-responders rather than identifying potential responders to opioid medication. Future pre-clinical human research may consider these results when investigating the analgesic effect of opioid agonists by means of QST.

Early skin denervation in hereditary and iatrogenic transthyretin amyloid neuropathy.

To elucidate early skin denervation in hereditary transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis and iatrogenic TTR amyloidosis. We investigated intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) and clinical findings in 32 patients with hereditary TTR amyloidosis, 11 asymptomatic mutation carriers, 6 patients with iatrogenic TTR amyloidosis, and 23 healthy volunteers. IENFD values were reduced in patients with the V30M mutation (1.9 ± 2.1 per 1 mm), patients with non-V30M mutations (5.8 ± 3.2 per 1 mm), and patients with iatrogenic TTR amyloidosis (3.5 ± 1.8 per 1 mm) compared with healthy volunteers (11.8 ± 3.2 per 1 mm) (p < 0.01). Skin denervation also occurred, even in presymptomatic V30M mutation carriers (5.0 ± 2.2 per 1 mm). The IENFD was correlated with disease duration (ρ = -0.533, p = 0.002) and various peripheral neuropathy parameters such as sensory impairment in the Kumamoto clinical score (ρ = -0.575, p = 0.001), heat-pain detection threshold (ρ = -0.704, p < 0.001), and sural sensory nerve action potential (ρ = 0.481, p = 0.005). TTR amyloid deposits frequently occurred in connective tissues and vessels of the dermal reticular layer in patients with hereditary TTR amyloidosis and those with iatrogenic TTR amyloidosis. Patients with hereditary TTR amyloidosis and those with iatrogenic TTR amyloidosis may show early skin denervation even in the presymptomatic stage. IENFD may thus be useful for early diagnosis and may serve as a biomarker in clinical trials for hereditary and iatrogenic TTR amyloidosis.

Heat pain detection threshold is associated with the area of secondary hyperalgesia following brief thermal sensitization: a study of healthy male volunteers.

IntroductionThe area of secondary hyperalgesia following brief thermal sensitization (BTS) of the skin and heat pain detection thresholds (HPDT) may both have predictive abilities in regards to pain sensitivity and clinical pain states. The association between HPDT and secondary hyperalgesia, however, remains unsettled, and the dissimilarities in physiologic properties suggest that they may represent 2 distinctively different pain entities. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between HPDT and BTS-induced secondary hyperalgesia.MethodsA sample of 121 healthy male participants was included and tested on 2 separate study days with BTS (45°C, 3 minutes), HPDT, and pain during thermal stimulation (45°C, 1 minute). Areas of secondary hyperalgesia were quantified after monofilament pinprick stimulation. The pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) were also applied.ResultsA significant association between HPDT and the size of the area of secondary hyperalgesia (p<0.0001) was found. The expected change in area of secondary hyperalgesia due to a 1-degree increase in HPDT was estimated to be −27.38 cm2, 95% confidence interval (CI) of −37.77 to −16.98 cm2, with an R2 of 0.19. Likewise, a significant association between HADS-depression subscore and area of secondary hyperalgesia (p=0.046) was found, with an estimated expected change in secondary hyperalgesia to a 1-point increase in HADS-depression subscore of 11 cm2, 95% CI (0.19–21.82), and with R2 of 0.03. We found no significant associations between secondary hyperalgesia area and PCS score or pain during thermal stimulation.ConclusionHPDT and the area of secondary hyperalgesia after BTS are significantly associated; however, with an R2 of only 19%, HPDT only offers a modest explanation of the inter-participant variation in the size of the secondary hyperalgesia area elicited by BTS.

Does Dexmedetomidine Have a Perineural Mechanism of Action When Used as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine?: A Paired, Blinded, Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

Dexmedetomidine used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics may prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. Whether this is mediated by a perineural or systemic mechanism remains unknown. The authors hypothesized that dexmedetomidine has a peripheral mechanism of action. The authors conducted a randomized, paired, triple-blind trial in healthy volunteers. All received bilateral saphenous nerve blocks with 20 ml ropivacaine, 0.5%, plus 1 ml dexmedetomidine, 100 µg/ml, in one thigh and 20 ml ropivacaine 0.5% plus 1 ml saline in the other thigh. The primary outcome measure was the duration of block assessed by temperature sensation (alcohol swab). The secondary outcome measure was the duration of block assessed by pinprick, pain during tonic heat stimulation, warmth detection threshold, and heat pain detection threshold. All 21 enrolled volunteers completed the trial. The mean duration of block assessed by temperature sensation in the leg receiving ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine was 22 h (95% CI, 21 to 24) compared to 20 h (95% CI, 19 to 21) in the leg receiving ropivacaine plus placebo with a mean difference of 2 h (95% CI, 1 to 3; P = 0.001). The duration of block was also significantly longer in the leg receiving dexmedetomidine when assessed by pinprick, pain during tonic heat stimulation, and warmth detection threshold but not heat pain detection threshold. One participant experienced numbness in an area in the leg receiving dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of a saphenous nerve block by a peripheral mechanism when controlling for systemic effects but not necessarily to a clinically relevant extent.

Does dexamethasone have a perineural mechanism of action? A paired, blinded, randomized, controlled study in healthy volunteers

BackgroundDexamethasone prolongs block duration. Whether this is achieved via a peripheral or a central mechanism of action is unknown. We hypothesized that perineural dexamethasone added as an adjuvant to ropivacaine prolongs block duration compared with ropivacaine alone, by a locally mediated effect when controlled for a systemic action. MethodsWe performed a paired, blinded, randomized trial, including healthy men. All subjects received bilateral blocks of the saphenous nerve with ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 ml mixed with dexamethasone 2 mg in one leg and saline in the other, according to randomization. The primary outcome was the duration of sensory block assessed by temperature discrimination in the saphenous nerve distribution. Secondary outcomes were sensory block assessed by mechanical discrimination, pain response to tonic heat stimulation, and warmth and heat pain detection thresholds. ResultsWe included 20 subjects; one had a failed block and was excluded from the paired analysis. Block duration was not statistically significantly longer in the leg receiving dexamethasone when assessed by temperature discrimination (primary outcome, estimated median difference 1.5 h, 95% confidence interval −3.5 to 0, P=0.050). For all other outcomes, the duration was statistically significantly longer in the leg receiving dexamethasone, but the median differences were <2.0 h. Individual subject analysis revealed that only eight subjects had a block prolongation of at least 2 h in the leg receiving dexamethasone perineurally. ConclusionPerineural administration of dexamethasone 2 mg showed a modest and inconsistent effect of questionable clinical relevance on block duration. Clinical trial registrationNCT01981746.

TRPV1 antagonist JNJ-39439335 (mavatrep) demonstrates proof of pharmacology in healthy men: a first-in-human, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, sequential group study.

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential group, phase 1 study was designed to assess in healthy men, the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and translational pharmacodynamics of JNJ-39439335 (mavatrep), a transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 antagonist; it was preceded by a translational preclinical study which assessed the ability of JNJ-39439335 to block capsaicin-induced flare in rats, providing predictive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data that informed the subsequent phase 1 clinical study. The clinical study consisted of 2 parts: part 1 assessed pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, including heat pain detection threshold and heat pain tolerance, of JNJ-39439335, and part 2 assessed pharmacodynamic effect of JNJ-39439335 on capsaicin-induced flare and sensory testing on naïve and UVB-sensitized skin in humans. Plasma concentrations of JNJ-39439335 peaked at approximately 2 to 4 hours postdose, then declined multiexponentially, with a prolonged terminal phase (half-life: 30-86 hours). Renal clearance of JNJ-39439335 was negligible. JNJ-39439335 treatment resulted in clear, consistent dose-related increases in heat pain detection threshold, heat pain tolerance, and heat pain latency. JNJ-39439335 reduced the capsaicin-induced flare area and flare intensity, with complete blocking observed in the 50-mg dose group at 144 hours postdose. This was consistent with the capsaicin flare results observed with JNJ-39439335 in rats. The most common adverse events observed in the clinical study were related to increases in body temperature after JNJ-39439335 treatment; these were predominately mild to moderate in severity with no evidence of exposure dependence up to 225 mg. JNJ-39439335 was well tolerated at single doses up to 225 mg, recommending its suitability for further clinical development.

The Area of Secondary Hyperalgesia following Heat Stimulation in Healthy Male Volunteers: Inter- and Intra-Individual Variance and Reproducibility.

IntroductionClinical pain models can be applied when investigating basic physiologic pain responses in healthy volunteers. Several pain models exist; however, only few have been adequately validated. Our primary aim with this prospective study was to investigate the intra- and inter-individual variation in secondary hyperalgesia elicited by brief thermal sensitization (45°C for 3 min) in healthy volunteers.Material and MethodsFifty healthy volunteers were included. Areas of secondary hyperalgesia following brief thermal sensitization were investigated by 2 observers on 4 experimental days, with a minimum interval of 7 days. Additionally, heat pain detection threshold and pain during thermal stimulation (45°C for 1 min.), and the psychological tests Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score were applied.ResultsFor areas of secondary hyperalgesia, an intra-observer intra-person correlation of 0.85, 95% CI [0.78, 0.90], an intra-observer inter-person correlation of 0.03, 95% CI [0.00, 0.16], and a coefficient of variation of 0.17, 95% CI [0.14, 0.21] was demonstrated. Four percent of the study population had areas of secondary hyperalgesia both below the 1st and above the 3rd quartile considering all included participants. Heat pain detection threshold predicted area of secondary hyperalgesia with an adjusted R2 of 0.20 (P = 0.0006).ConclusionsWe have demonstrated a low intra-individual, and a high inter-individual variation in thermally induced secondary hyperalgesia. We conclude that brief thermal sensitization produce secondary hyperalgesia with a high level of reproducibility, which can be applied to investigate different phenotypes related to secondary hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT02166164