Healthcare Practice Research Articles

The impact of social media and online communities of practice in rheumatology

The COVID-19 pandemic changed healthcare practices and social media played a significant role in those changes. While social media and online practice communities allow collaboration and engagement, education and knowledge dissemination, research and publication, promotion, and the potential for improved clinical care, their use also involves perils and pitfalls. The literature suggests that rheumatologists use innovative social media platforms for both professional and social purposes. Similarly, many patients with rheumatic disease use social media for education and communication. This review outlined the background of social media platforms, the reasons for their use, and associated risks. This review further discussed the need to better understand the benefits of social media and online communities as well as the potential negative effects that could impact the practice of rheumatology.

Talking about practice: agency and its structural context in regional healthcare practice change

ABSTRACT Ageing societies and rising instances of non-communicable diseases require changes in public healthcare service provision. Despite a plethora of propositions, most innovations never become practically applied. In understanding innovation as a place- and path-dependent change process which depends on actors’ agency to reconfigure routinised practices and their structural context, we show how actors create, perceive and act upon opportunities for change while tracing the development trajectories of two networks in the regions of Murcia (Spain) and Örebro (Sweden), respectively. The cases illustrate the role intermediary actors play in creating opportunities and shaping organisational and institutional context.

Health Catch-UP!: a realist evaluation of an innovative multi-disease screening and vaccination tool in UK primary care for at-risk migrant patients

BackgroundMigrants to the UK face disproportionate risk of infections, non-communicable diseases, and under-immunisation compounded by healthcare access barriers. Current UK migrant screening strategies are unstandardised with poor implementation and low uptake. Health Catch-UP! is a collaboratively produced digital clinical decision support system that applies current guidelines (UKHSA and NICE) to provide primary care professionals with individualised multi-disease screening (7 infectious diseases/blood-borne viruses, 3 chronic parasitic infections, 3 non-communicable disease or risk factors) and catch-up vaccination prompts for migrant patients.MethodsWe carried out a mixed-methods process evaluation of Health Catch-UP! in two urban primary healthcare practices to integrate Health Catch-UP! into the electronic health record system of primary care, using the Medical Research Council framework for complex intervention evaluation. We collected quantitative data (demographics, patients screened, disease detection and catch-up vaccination rates) and qualitative participant interviews to explore acceptability and feasibility.ResultsNinety-nine migrants were assessed by Health Catch-UP! across two sites (S1, S2). 96.0% (n = 97) had complete demographics coding with Asia 31.3% (n = 31) and Africa 25.2% (n = 25), the most common continents of birth (S1 n = 92 [48.9% female (n = 44); mean age 60.6 years (SD 14.26)]; and S2 n = 7 [85.7% male (n = 6); mean age 39.4 years (SD16.97)]. 61.6% (n = 61) of participants were eligible for screening for at least one condition and uptake of screening was high 86.9% (n = 53). Twelve new conditions were identified (12.1% of study population) including hepatitis C (n = 1), hypercholesteraemia (n = 6), pre-diabetes (n = 4), and diabetes (n = 1). Health Catch-UP! identified that 100% (n = 99) of patients had no immunisations recorded; however, subsequent catch-up vaccination uptake was poor (2.0%, n = 1). Qualitative data supported acceptability and feasibility of Health Catch-UP! from staff and patient perspectives, and recommended Health Catch-UP! integration into routine care (e.g. NHS health checks) with an implementation package including staff and patient support materials, standardised care pathways (screening and catch-up vaccination, laboratory, and management), and financial incentivisation.ConclusionsClinical Decision Support Systems like Health Catch-UP! can improve disease detection and implementation of screening guidance for migrant patients but require robust testing, resourcing, and an effective implementation package to support both patients and staff.

A Study To Assess Knowledge And Attitude Regarding Complementary And Alternative Medicine Among Community People (20-60 Years) In Selected Rural Area Of Kolar District With A View To Develop Information Booklet.

Background: Traditional Indian Systems of Medicine, including Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, Yoga, Naturopathy, and Homoeopathy, have played a significant role in global healthcare. This study provides general information on these systems, focusing on their historical background, conceptual basis, and different disciplines studied. It aims to understand the importance and uses of these systems in evolving material medico and their future role in healthcare. Aim: The primary objective was to assess knowledge and attitude regarding complementary and alternative medicine and to find the co relation and association between knowledge and attitude. Methods: A descriptive design was used to study 75 study participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria from a selected Rural Area of Kolar District. The instruments were prepared by the investigator to assess the knowledge and attitude related to complementary and alternative medicine. Information booklet was provided to all study participants after the data collection. Results: The current study findings show that 70% (SD 3.524) had inadequate knowledge and 68% (SD 4.534) had moderately favorable attitude towards complementary and alternative medicine. Conclusion: The findings of the study indicate that Complementary medicine is an increasing feature of healthcare practice, but considerable confusion remains still the same about what exactly it is henceforth information booklet was provided to the study participants to increase their knowledge on its importance and uses.

A New Natural Language Processing-Inspired Methodology (Detection, Initial Characterization, and Semantic Characterization) to Investigate Temporal Shifts (Drifts) in Health Care Data: Quantitative Study.

Proper analysis and interpretation of health care data can significantly improve patient outcomes by enhancing services and revealing the impacts of new technologies and treatments. Understanding the substantial impact of temporal shifts in these data is crucial. For example, COVID-19 vaccination initially lowered the mean age of at-risk patients and later changed the characteristics of those who died. This highlights the importance of understanding these shifts for assessing factors that affect patient outcomes. This study aims to propose detection, initial characterization, and semantic characterization (DIS), a new methodology for analyzingchanges in health outcomes and variables over time while discovering contextual changes for outcomes in large volumes of data. The DIS methodology involves 3 steps: detection, initial characterization, and semantic characterization. Detection uses metrics such as Jensen-Shannon divergence to identify significant data drifts. Initial characterization offers a global analysis of changes in data distribution and predictive feature significance over time. Semantic characterization uses natural language processing-inspired techniques to understand the local context of these changes, helping identify factors driving changes in patient outcomes. By integrating the outcomes from these 3 steps, our results can identify specific factors (eg, interventions and modifications in health care practices) that drive changes in patient outcomes. DIS was applied to the Brazilian COVID-19 Registry and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care, version IV (MIMIC-IV) data sets. Our approach allowed us to (1) identify drifts effectively, especially using metrics such as the Jensen-Shannon divergence, and (2) uncover reasons for the decline in overall mortality in both the COVID-19 and MIMIC-IV data sets, as well as changes in the cooccurrence between different diseases and this particular outcome. Factors such as vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic and reduced iatrogenic events and cancer-related deaths in MIMIC-IV were highlighted. The methodology also pinpointed shifts in patient demographics and disease patterns, providing insights into the evolving health care landscape during the study period. We developed a novel methodology combining machine learningand natural language processing techniques to detect, characterize, and understand temporal shifts in health care data. This understanding can enhance predictive algorithms, improve patient outcomes, and optimize health care resource allocation, ultimatelyimproving the effectiveness of machine learning predictive algorithms applied to health care data. Our methodology can be applied to a variety of scenarios beyond those discussed in this paper.

Implementation Measures to Break the Gender Gap - a Scoping Review

Abstract Background For myocardial infarction, in-hospital lethality is still significantly higher in women than in men in Germany. Medical guidelines and nursing expert standards include recommendations for gender-sensitive care (GSC+), but it is unknown how these are implemented in health care practice. Research question: Which measures facilitate the implementation of GSC+? Methods Systematic literature research was conducted on Pubmed, web of science and CINAHL with adequate keywords connected with Boolean connectors. Results The initial literature search yielded a pool of 23,508 items. After removing irrelevant articles and duplicates 119 articles were included in the present scoping review. Among fifteen generated dimensions, which are summarized to six main dimensions (education, research & science, politics, LGBTQ+ care & education, institutions of care and career advancement), the included articles are related. Education is the dimension with the most identified articles. Key messages of main dimensions are that GSC+ • must be anchored in compulsory subjects of curricula; • must be considered in research. Researchers need to be aware and should follow a structured framework for generating sex-specific guidelines; • can get gain access to politics through purposeful lobby work; • in terms of LGBTQ+ care should be learnt from health care providers to LGBTQ+ people through case studies; • should be implemented strategical through change agents in institutions of care; • can be enhanced through aware women in leading positions, to implement GSC+ successfully. Conclusions The implementation of GSC+ has a positive impact on patient care and could reduce undesirable events or outcomes. To reach the implementation target the politics must set frame conditions and universities, science and health care providers have to integrate them. Moreover, the generation of evidence is important to promote GSC+ so that health care professionals have a defined work assignment for GSC+. Key messages • The research results provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature on implementation measures of gender-sensitive care. • Healthcare providers are sensitized to gender-sensitive care so that patient care can be further improved.

3.Y.2. Road traffic injuries, disability burden and implications for compensation schemes in Europe

Abstract Reducing traffic fatalities and injuries is a complex challenge, but it is one that is of paramount importance for public health and safety worldwide. In recent years, there have been improvements in trauma care and injury prevention efforts, which reduced mortality rates and increased survival after serious injury. However, an increased heterogeneity in recovery times is observed with survivors of road traffic injuries differing in their adjustment compared to other traumas in terms of symptoms’ onset, variability and chronicity. The recovery trajectory seems to vary widely with a large percentage of survivors in need of extensive time periods for full recovery. Attention has now been shifted towards the adverse effects of non-fatal injuries on functional, mental health, economic and societal outcomes. The capacity of a person to continue functioning, inability to work, sickness absence and reliance on welfare benefits to compensate for loss of income are some of the injury-related long-term consequences, causing great concern for health and social security systems across Europe, as they have been shown to account for more than one third of total road traffic incident costs. These figures fail to include individuals who sustain “minor” injuries, which do not require hospitalisation, yet still impair their ability to work. Despite the rapidly growing epidemiological and clinical attention, there are still several issues missing from research, policy and practice. A universal definition of recovery after a road traffic injury is still missing, and this has been seen as critical for improved understanding of risk factors of poor recovery as well as improved identification of those in need of welfare benefits. Furthermore, long-term sickness absence and disability following road traffic injury in Europe is still understudied and evidence on the different return to work pathways and compensation schemes is scarce. Evidence is still limited on the context in which return to work occurs, the injury profiles most dependent on long term compensation schemes and the policy settings of injury compensation schemes that impact return to work outcomes post injury. Data availability and data linkage issues often cause misclassification errors when granting disability pensions and this remains unattended long after an injury. Welfare benefits are often poorly connected with the injury or other medical diagnoses and this makes it difficult to assess the contribution of injuries on disability pensions and other welfare benefits, especially in comorbid and multimorbid conditions. The current workshop aims to improve our understanding of the long-term consequences and the challenges faced by those injured in road traffic injuries and aid the development of interventions that seek to enable sustained recovery, and help inform policy and practice of healthcare and injury compensation systems. Key messages • Timely access to quality healthcare, rehabilitation therapies, and assistive technologies can significantly improve outcomes and reduce the strain on social security and compensation systems. • Ensuring equitable access to social security benefits for injured individuals, requires efficient compensation schemes that recognize the full impact of the disability on individuals’ life.

Self-determination and self-affirmative paths of trans* and gender diverse people in Portugal: Diverse identities and healthcare

Abstract Background Trans* and gender diverse (TGD) people are very heterogeneous. While legal contexts and healthcare practices have been growingly endorsing self-determination and consent for gender affirmative care in some countries, gender affirmation trajectories need to be understood as unique and fluid processes, constructed and negotiated by each individual in a given social and cultural context. This study aimed to characterize diverse profiles of TGD people in Portugal, regarding individual choices and trajectories in social, legal, and medical gender affirmative processes. Methods A questionnaire, first developed in France and used in Brazil, Italy, Norway, and Chile, was adapted to the Portuguese context. The conducted survey is comprised of 120 questions, organized into six sections: 1) sociodemographic variables; 2) gender affirmation processes and medical and psychological care; 3) general health and sexual health; 4) mental health; 5) sexuality and sexual concerns; 6) experiences of discrimination and gender identity. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 115 adults who identified as TGD. Content analysis was performed on the written responses, and later categorized. Results Approximately 21% of people identified as men, 17% as trans men, 7% as women, 12% as trans women, 26% as non-binary persons, and 17% as agender or other identifications. Differences were calculated among profiles of TGD participants and their choices for affirmative care, social, and legal transition, revealing an association between the way people self-identify and the request for legal recognition of gender identity, as well as the choices of procedures (or aspirations) for medical affirmation (i.e., hormonal treatments, top surgery, bottom surgery). Conclusions The provision of health care practices consistent with the principles of self-determination requires training of health care professionals and adjustment of public policies, to allow for unique trajectories and profiles.

7.X.2. Planetary Health: metaphorical visualizations of transdisciplinary working in practice

Abstract Across public health and healthcare practices, we signal low awareness and little urgency for Planetary Health among health professionals as well as lacking or lagging implementation of planned policies. Planetary health requires a ‘just do it’ mentality with a transdisciplinary and reflection-in-action approach. There is a need for a bottom up movement, but HOW to get started and HOW to persevere against all odds? This 25 minute pecha kaucha session is aimed at facilitating transdisciplinary learning for planetary health action. We will start with a brief introduction to the concept of Planetary Health, followed by two short presentations on two metaphorical work processes underlying the startup of a flowering community garden and the preparations for a delicious Italian lasagna. The second half of the session is dedicated to a creative exercise with the audience, generating multiple metaphors in small groups using picture cards, paper drawings. We finalize this session by collaboratively building a visualised sea with transdisciplinary waves of metaphorical innovations that, instead of litter and pollution, make our beaches and shores stronger foundations protective of our planetary life. Key messages • Planetary health requires a ‘just do it’ mentality with a transdisciplinary reflection-in-action approach. • Metaphorical reasoning visualizes social reality and boosts Planetary health mentality, community spirit and transdisciplinary action.

Eco-friendly treatment: a win-win for patients, health systems, and the planet. Rapid scoping review

Abstract Background As the fifth-largest CO2 emitter globally, the healthcare industry must act to mitigate its environmental impact. This includes de-implementing low-value care and adopting eco-friendly innovative treatment alternatives. Our study aims to explore existing research on the environmental effects of these actions and the outcome measures utilized. Methods We conducted a rapid scoping review following a pre-published protocol, searching Ovid MEDLINE® and Scopus (Elsevier) from January 2015 to June 19, 2023. Initially, dual abstract and full-text screening was performed, followed by a single review. Data extraction was cross-checked by a second reviewer. Findings were narratively described using summary statistics. Results We analyzed 182 articles, primarily life cycle assessments and modeling studies (92 out of 182), with only one study being a randomized controlled trial. The research covered various healthcare practices, including consultation methods/telemedicine (32%), surgical and medical device usage (26%), medication (25%), surgical procedures (19%), as well as diagnostic tests, screening, and imaging (13%). The main sustainability strategies mentioned were ‘Rethink’ (99%) and ‘Reduce’ (81%), with ‘Reuse’ (32%), ‘Recycle’ (19%), and ‘Refuse’ (10%) being less utilized. Environmental outcomes reported included global warming (88%), resource consumption (27%), and chemical hazards (23%). Most studies were conducted in Europe (48%), followed by the USA (37%), with 75% published after 2020. Conclusions The environmental impact of healthcare is a pivotal area for public health action and fortunately, it is also emerging as a significant research field. Utilizing methodological approaches less common in evidence-based healthcare research underscores the necessity for innovative interdisciplinary collaboration and capacity building. The most pressing research gap lies in the impact of de-implementation strategies (“refuse”) targeting low-value care practices. Key messages • Measuring the environmental impact of healthcare demands the development of novel cross-disciplinary research methods and collaborations. • De-implementing low-value care represents a future win-win scenario for patients, the financial viability of healthcare systems, and global environmental sustainability.

Assessing AI literacy and attitudes among medical students: implications for integration into healthcare practice

PurposeThis study aims to assess AI literacy and attitudes among medical students and explore their implications for integrating AI into healthcare practice.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative research design was employed to comprehensively evaluate AI literacy and attitudes among 374 Lusaka Apex Medical University medical students. Data were collected from April 3, 2024, to April 30, 2024, using a closed-ended questionnaire. The questionnaire covered various aspects of AI literacy, perceived benefits of AI in healthcare, strategies for staying informed about AI, relevant AI applications for future practice, concerns related to AI algorithm training and AI-based chatbots in healthcare.FindingsThe study revealed varying levels of AI literacy among medical students with a basic understanding of AI principles. Perceptions regarding AI’s role in healthcare varied, with recognition of key benefits such as improved diagnosis accuracy and enhanced treatment planning. Students relied predominantly on online resources to stay informed about AI. Concerns included bias reinforcement, data privacy and over-reliance on technology.Originality/valueThis study contributes original insights into medical students' AI literacy and attitudes, highlighting the need for targeted educational interventions and ethical considerations in AI integration within medical education and practice.

Barriers to young people’s use of sexual and reproductive health services in Asia-Pacific

Abstract Background Qualitative literature extensively documents young people’s barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Asia-Pacific countries. However, efforts to synthesise this research for practical use in healthcare policy and practice are lacking. This systematic review aims to systematically review and synthesise published qualitative literature focusing on young people’s utilisation of SRH services and understanding common access barriers. Methods We systematically searched five electronic databases from inception until 24 June 2022: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Google Scholar and reference lists of all included studies were also searched. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for appraising the quality of included studies and analysed the data using a thematic synthesis approach. Results We included 31 papers reporting the experiences of over 1800 young people from 16 Asia-Pacific countries. Thematic synthesis identified several factors affecting adolescents’ utilisation of SRH services, which were grouped into six descriptive themes: navigating puberty; lack of SRH knowledge; embarrassment and confidentiality concerns; low decision-making autonomy; traditional practices and religious beliefs; and socio-cultural norms. Our overreaching analytical theme highlighted the role of shame as a key emotion hindering young people’s utilisation of SRH services. Conclusions Direct communication about SRH issues is crucial for teenagers. Embarrassment, privacy concerns, and stigma significantly affect their service utilisation decisions. Inclusive interventions for both youth and their communities by addressing socio-cultural factors are essential for optimising service accessibility and guiding evidence-based interventions and policies across diverse cultural contexts. Key messages • Understanding young people’s SRH service barriers in Asia-Pacific countries: Socio-cultural norms are highlighted as crucial for optimising service utilisation among young individuals in this area. • Inclusive interventions and policies are needed for enhanced accessibility.

Gender-specific impact of COVID-19 in the UAE: Analyzing gender disparities in health and well-being

Abstract Background Understanding gender disparities in health impacts during pandemics is crucial. While early observations of the COVID-19 pandemic suggested higher severity and mortality rates among males, subsequent studies hinted at a disproportionate impact on females’ health and well-being. This study aimed to explore gender-specific differences related to COVID-19 in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods Data from four independent surveys were analyzed to assess gender differences in knowledge about available vaccines, vaccine hesitancy, COVID-19 severity, admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), anxiety among healthcare workers (HCWs), and psychological health of healthcare workers and the general population. Gender gaps were calculated as the absolute difference between males and females. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were performed to test the association between gender, age, and selected outcome variables. Results Males had a significantly higher risk of moderate to severe COVID-19 symptoms (71%) compared to females (63%). The gender gap in symptom severity was smallest among those aged 55+ and highest among adults aged 35-54. Post-discharge, 22% more females reported multiple conditions than males. Among HCWs, females showed lower knowledge (19% gap) and higher vaccine hesitancy (20% gap), with larger gaps among older age groups. Females also experienced more anxiety and psychological stress, especially in the 35-54 age group. Logistic regression confirmed higher odds for females in reporting vaccine hesitancy, long COVID-19 symptoms, and anxiety, even after adjusting for demographic factors. Conclusions This study highlights unequal health outcomes and burdens experienced by women and men during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UAE. The distinct challenges faced by women, including higher mental health burdens and persistent post-recovery symptoms, suggest systemic gender disparities that require targeted attention in healthcare policies and practices. Key messages • Gender disparities in COVID-19 were evident in the UAE with males experiencing severe COVID-19 symptoms, while females experienced post-recovery symptons, vaccine hesitancy, and stress. • Urgent action is required to address gender disparities in COVID-19 impacts, emphasizing mental health support and post-recovery care in policy formulation.

Understanding the benefits of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and influence of hyperkalaemia on their prescription: a UK survey of healthcare professionals' views and practice

Abstract Background Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and they should be increased to the maximally tolerated dose. However, their use is often hindered by hyperkalaemia leading to discontinuation or down titration. Purpose Assess perceptions of primary and secondary healthcare professionals regarding benefits of RAASi according to indication and, in the context of developing hyperkalaemia, to identify barriers to optimal utilisation, and to explore options for improving management protocols, specifically in HFrEF. Methods An electronic survey was distributed in primary and secondary care setting in Hampshire, UK, to evaluate knowledge about benefits of RAASi, clinical response to varying level of potassium (K+), and decision-making using several clinical scenarios. Hyperkalaemia was graded into mild (serum K+ 5.5 – 5.9 mmol/L), moderate (serum K+ 6.0 – 6.4 mmol/L) or severe (serum K+ ≥ 6.5 mmol/L). Results Between November 2021 and January 2023, 300 questionnaires were completed by 274 (91%) physicians (varying grades of seniority), 22 (7%) non-medical prescribers, and 4 (1%) pharmacists. 80% were working in secondary care across different specialities (31 working in cardiology and 15 in nephrology). The majority were aware of prognostic benefit of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in patients with HFrEF although this was lower for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) (Fig 1). Fewer than 2/3 of respondents were aware of impact of ACEi on symptoms. In the presence of mild hyperkalaemia, 75% and 88% of healthcare professionals would stop or reduce ACEi and MRA, respectively. In moderate or severe hyperkalaemia, this increased to 96% and 97%, respectively (Fig 2A-B). When considering the scenario of a patient with HFrEF who had ACEi stopped due to K+ 5.9 mmol/L, the potassium at which the responder would consider re-starting the ACEi ranged from 77% when potassium level < 5.5 mmol/L to 1% in moderate or severe hyperkalaemia (Fig 2C). 74% of healthcare professionals were familiar with local hyperkalaemia management protocol and 93% supported dedicated training on RAASi dose adjustment and hyperkalaemia management. Conclusion This survey, across a broad range of healthcare professionals, shows uncertainties around knowledge of benefits of RAASi in patients with HFrEF and there is sizeable variation in the prescribing response to degrees of hyperkalaemia. Given the voluntary nature of the survey, it is plausible that these data are biased towards individuals with greater understanding. Regardless, there is a need for continued education with a goal of improving patient-centred care.

Healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards cardiovascular disease prevention: a multi-national cross-sectional study

Abstract Introduction Prior studies have shown that improved primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) may significantly delay its onset. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are well-placed to influence healthy lifestyle habits for CVD prevention. However, it is unclear how well HCWs fare in this role given the multiple demands on their time in clinical practice. Purpose We sought to understand the CVD prevention knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAPs) of HCWs across 25 nations. Insights gained could help inform efforts to optimise CVD prevention by HCWs. Methodology: Data was collected via an anonymous, online questionnaire which consisted of pre-validated CVD prevention and smoking cessation subscales adapted from the Preventive Medicine Attitudes and Activities Questionnaire (PMAAQ). The subscales have been previously validated in a study population of primary care residents in the US, demonstrating validity and reliability. Results 668 HCWs (60% doctors, 28% nurses, 12% medical students) from 25 nations responded to the survey. Overall, 74.86% of HCWs routinely assessed patients’ cardiovascular (CV) risk profiles in clinical practice. 65.65% of HCWs counselled patients who were asymptomatic for CVD on tangible lifestyle changes to improve their CV risk profiles, while 68.22% of HCWs did so when patients were overweight. Of note, only 51.26% of HCWs implemented comprehensive smoking cessation interventions for their patients. Practising HCWs demonstrated higher levels of CVD prevention promotion than medical students in all aspects (Fig 1b), except for self-reported importance of CVD risk factor counselling in primary prevention (Tukey HSD diff: 0.31, p-value: 0.051). Among practising HCWs, there were no significant differences in their promotion of CVD prevention across varying lengths of clinical practice. HCWs from higher income nations[1] tended to fare worse than their lower income counterparts in the promotion of CVD prevention (Fig 1a). Conclusion A large multi-national survey reveals significant gaps in the promotion of CVD prevention by HCWs, highlighting key differences in CVD prevention practices based on national income status. The results also demonstrate significant differences between medical students and practising HCWs’ CVD prevention behaviours, highlighting the role of continuing education for the promotion of long-term positive CVD prevention clinical practices amongst HCWs. Further efforts may target the medical education of early-career HCWs, especially in higher income nations. [1] National income level is defined as per the World Bank's classification, with the exception of Taiwan which is not classified as an independent nation under the World Bank. However, Taiwan is still labelled as a high income nation as her GNI (US$33,565) fits the criterion of the World Bank's definition of a high income nation (GNI per capita of >US$13,846).Table 1:Participant demographicsFigure 1a and 1b

Leveraging Telemedicine for Disaster Response: Longitudinal Study on Return-to-Work Programs During the COVID-19 Crisis.

Since COVID-19, Indonesia has legalized telemedicine in medical services, including Return to Work (RTW). RTW programs help occupational injury-disabled workers return to work. This research examines how telemedicine supports RTW for employees with occupational injuries. The study used Interrupted Time Series Analysis (ITSA) to find patterns and trends in RTW program telemedicine case numbers and claim settlements over time. A total of 1 314 data were obtained from the Indonesian National Social Security Agency on Employment (BPJS Ketenagakerjaan) from July 1, 2015, to December 2022. Telemedicine reduces the frequency of recurrent occupational injuries in persons with impairments (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.59). In addition, the integration of telemedicine into health care practices exhibits promising prospects in terms of mitigating the financial burden on social security programs. This is supported by a robust RR (0.6). Telemedicine reduced the number of repeat cases and optimized medical claims cost in the RTW program during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results will contribute to policy and assist health care professionals and employers in improving RTW outcomes for disabled people.

Post-operative Mortality Trends for Complicated Appendicitis: Adults with and without Disabilities

Abstract Background Even for the same complicated appendicitis, the prognosis may vary if appropriate post-operative care and follow-up are not provided. We aimed to investigate the 10-year trend of complicated appendicitis mortality among disabilities and non-disabilities peoples in Korea, recognizing potential disparities in post-surgical outcomes and the importance of adequate post-operative care. Methods Patients with complicated appendicitis were classified by severity using DRG codes. Causes of death were categorized into infectious, respiratory, cardiovascular, and digestive diseases using ICD-10 data. Age-adjusted mortality rates were calculated annually from 2008 to 2017 based on disability presence, severity, and type. Factors associated complicated appendicitis mortality were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models. Results The mortality of complicated appendicitis was 10.2 times (40.8% vs. 413.9%) higher in people with disabilities, especially those with severe disabilities. This difference was more evident in patients with a severe disability (aOR=2.12, 95% CI:1.58-2.86), intellectual or psychological disability (aOR=2.95, 95% CI:1.49-5.85) and internal organ problems (aOR=2.05, 95% CI:1.28-3.28). Conclusions Our findings suggest that insufficient post-operative care among disabled peoples, especially those with severe disabilities, internal organ problems, and intellectual or psychological disabilities, may impact outcomes. This is exacerbated by poor healthcare facilities and limited disability awareness among healthcare workers. Additionally, further research is required to uncover unexplained mortality causes. Funding: This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2022R1I1A3070074) and by a grant of Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center (PACEN) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HC23C0165). Key messages • Complicated appendicitis mortality rates show a stark 10.2-fold disparity between people with and without disabilities. • Severe disabilities, intellectual or psychological disabilities, and internal organ problems heighten the risk, emphasizing the importance of disability-inclusive healthcare practices.

Driving innovation in primary healthcare though co-creation with stakeholders in Switzerland

Abstract Issue/problem Primary healthcare systems worldwide face challenges such as socio-demographic shifts, increasing chronic diseases, rising costs, and workforce shortages, demanding innovative solutions for the future of primary care. Description of the problem Addressing the complex challenges of creating a resilient primary healthcare model involves considering interdependent factors such as health policies, funding, workforce training, technology, and evolving diseases, alongside diverse stakeholder interests. To tackle this, the ‘Health2040: Co-creation of a Future Outpatient Primary Healthcare Model in Switzerland’ project was launched in 2023 to develop a forward-looking model by integrating insights from various stakeholders. Results The project involved 40 stakeholders, including patients, researchers, healthcare professionals, policy-makers, and insurers, in two full-day workshops aimed at co-creating a vision and actionable framework for Switzerland’s future primary care. The first workshop focused on developing and visualizing potential models, while the second targeted the transition to these new models and the creation of an implementation plan. These sessions were underpinned by a comprehensive literature review on emerging primary care models, providing a scientific foundation for the discussions. Lessons Successful co-creation requires significant preparatory efforts and innovative creativity techniques, such as Future Newspapers, brainstorming, games, and user personas. Engaging stakeholders throughout various stages of the project helped to enhance relevance. Feedback from a steering group on the workshop’s concept, methodologies, and evidence synthesis was instrumental. Healthcare practitioners also contributed their insights on patient personas, ensuring the models developed were pertinent to actual healthcare practices. Stakeholder engagement process was essential for fostering innovative ideas and ensuring stakeholder buy-in for the developed solutions. Key messages • Co-creation with stakeholders is a promising way to develop innovative solutions for health systems. • Integrating stakeholder input is crucial at all the project stages, from preparation to evaluation.

Environment, climate, socio-economics & restrictions impact on COVID-19 in Northen Italy

Abstract Up to now, studies on environmental, climatic, socio-economic factors, and non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) show diverse associations, often contrasting, with COVID-19 spread or severity. Most studies used large-scale, aggregated data, with limited adjustment for individual factors, and most of them focused on viral spread rather than severe outcomes. Moreover, evidence simultaneously evaluating variables belonging to different exposure domains is scarce, and none analysing their collective impact on an individual level. Our population-based retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the comprehensive role played by exposure variables belonging to four different domains, environmental, climatic, socio-economic, and non-pharmacological interventions (NPI), on individual COVID-19-related risk of hospitalization and death, analysing data from all patients (n.68472) tested positive to a SARS-CoV-2 swab in Modena Province (Northern Italy) between February 2020 and August 2021. Using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, we estimated the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, investigating dose-response relationships through restricted cubic spline modelling for hazard ratios. Several significant associations emerged: long-term exposure to air pollutants (NO2, PM10, PM2.5) was linked to hospitalization risk in a complex way and showed an increased risk for death; while humidity was inversely associated; temperature showed a U-shaped risk; wind speed showed a linear association with both outcomes. Precipitation increased hospitalization risk but decreased mortality. Socio-economic and NPI indices showed clear linear associations, respectively negative and positive, with both outcomes. Our findings offer insights for evidence-based policy decisions, improving precision healthcare practices, and safeguarding public health in future pandemics. Refinement of pandemic response plans by healthcare authorities could benefit significantly. Key messages • Evaluating simultaneously four exposure domains on COVID-19 outcomes informs public health policy for future pandemic management. • The comprehension of risk factors associated with severe outcomes, such as hospitalization and mortality, is pivotal for planning responses to similar health emergencies in the future.

Effects of a Six-Month Physical Activity Program on Health Risk Factors and Body Composition Among Overweight and Obese Middle-Aged Adults.

Introduction. Physical activity is vital for preventing and managing lifestyle-related diseases, which pose significant health and socio-economic challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a six-month supervised physical activity program on health risk factors and body composition in middle-aged individuals with overweight or obesity. Methods. The study involved 166 men and women aged 30 to 65 years, with a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 26 to 35 and moderate to severe health risks. Participants of the study were engaged in a six-month physical activity training program designed in accordance with World Health Organization guidelines. Comprehensive assessments were performed at baseline and after the intervention, including measurements of various anthropometric and body composition parameters, as well as evaluations of functional performance. Fitness tests were also conducted to assess participants' physical capacity and to monitor improvements throughout the training period. Results. Baseline measures of body mass composition and age demonstrated a strong positive correlation with visceral fat rating (VFR) in both men (r = 0.364, p < 0.001) and women (r = 0.420, p = 0.002). Following the six-month training program, participants exhibited an average improvement of 30% (p < 0.001) in their Cooper endurance test results. The physical activity intervention positively impacted body mass index (BMI) and various body composition metrics, including fat mass, VFR, and muscle mass, across all participants and most subgroups (gender, BMI, and age). In males, training at higher maximum heart rate (HRmax) zones significantly contributed to a reduction in the percentage of fat mass (80-89% HRmax) and an increase in the percentage of muscle mass (70-79% and 80-89% HRmax). Conclusions. The study indicates that a six-month supervised physical activity program significantly improves health risk factors and body composition (visceral fat reduction and improvement in percent of fat and muscle mass) among middle-aged individuals with overweight or obesity. Therefore, we advocate for the integration of structured physical activity interventions into healthcare practices to effectively enhance health outcomes in this population.