Structure Of Health System Research Articles

2.C. Round table: COVID-19 - strengthening governance for health and health systems resilience

ObjectiveThe aim of this panel discussion is to contribute to build back better after the pandemic, for enhanced public health and health system resilience. One key strategy to do this is to address key governance deficiencies. This includes: siloed preparedness and response efforts were. Responses were largely isolated from regular public health and health system structures. In many countries we have seen that crisis responses have not made use of existing public health infrastructure including sickness-funds, public health offices, social partnerships and professional associations, let alone the existing governance structures for patient participation.a lack in health leadership. During the pandemic health has been high on the political agenda as never before, but instead of having a Health in All Policies response, we had an All-Policies-in-Health-response. Prime ministers, regional heads of states and ministers in charge of the economy, interior and education have been usually much more central and influential in formulating a pandemic response than the minister of health and other health leaders. BackgroundEurope's countries should have responded better to the pandemic given its vast resources. It has highly developed public health services and high performing health systems embedded in comprehensive welfare systems and thriving economies. Explaining Europe's surprisingly disappointing response to the pandemic needs to go beyond arguments based solely on geography, political system, demography or wealth of the nation. These arguments can neither explain the variations within Europe nor the ones between the world regions. Therefore panelists will discuss the following topics in the light of the above mentioned governance deficiencies: From failure to resilience: the contribution of governanceDrawing lessons on better governing emergencies: systems Integration and health leadershipGoverning COVID-19 within countries at all levels - national, regional and localGoverning the private sector in pandemic times: towards new public-private-partnershipsGoverning health professionals surge capacity Added valueThis round table brings together governance deficiencies and how to remedy them and eventually strengthen health and health systems resilience. This is key if we want to better address the challenges to come. Coherence presentations/workshop topic: All presenters will need to lin their talks and topics to the two governance deficiencies identified.InteractivityAfter the chair persons have introduced the topic the panel discussion will go in three rounds addressing different aspects: a) core message (related to the topic); b) the problem of ‘siloed preparedness and response effort c) Insufficient health leadership. In between these rounds the chairs will pick up questions coming through the chat-box and feed them to the panelists.Speakers/Panelists Anna Sagan European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London, UK Dorit Nitzan WHO/Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark Dimitra Panteli European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium Tomas Zapata WHO/Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark Scott Greer University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Key messages Resolve the siloes and integrate emergency preparedness and response efforts into regular health and health systems structures.Health high on the political agenda is not good enough, health leadership is needed too addressing external shocks and challenges.

What motivates patients to change general practitioners in the Pleven region, Bulgaria?

Abstract Problem The World Health Organization's 2008 World Health Report, entitled ‘Primary care now more than ever,' clearly states the need of knowledge about primary care not as one of the ordinary structures of the national health system, but as its leading priority. Description of the problem Since the start of health reform in Bulgaria, the choice and change of a GP by patients is most often spontaneous, random, and without enough specific information about the qualities of the GP. This reduces the effectiveness of the free choice of a doctor. The purpose of this study was to analyze the patient's motives for changing their GP. A survey was conducted among respondents in the period from September 1st to 30th, 2018 in the Pleven Region, Bulgaria. Patients who visited their GPs during the study period were interviewed. The results were processed using Microsoft Office Excel 2007. Results It was established that 830 (78.8%) of the 1053 respondents in the territory of Pleven Region have changed their personal doctor. The three leading motives were: long waiting times in front of the GP's office - 30.2%, change of residence - 19%, and lack of sufficient referrals from a physician to the specialist - 11.7%. Most of the surveyed patients assessed their GP as having a positive attitude toward them. 132 (12.6%) of the participants rate their personal doctor as rude, always being in a hurry, and nervous or not giving them any answers at all. Lessons When choosing a GP, the patient's prior information about the qualities and competencies of the personal physician of his\her choice is very low. It is necessary to create a system for the informed choice of a personal physician which will have a double effect, 1) a more adequate and more critically justified choice of a GP by the patient, and 2) a clearer, more stable commitment and responsibility of the GPs to the patients who chose them. Key messages It is necessary to improve the overall organization of the work of GPs. Healthcare is a type of interaction between the doctor and the patient during the diagnostic and treatment process.

Developing Framework and Strategies for Capacity Building to Apply Evidence-Informed Health Policy-Making in Iran: Mixed Methods Study of SAHSHA Project.

SASHA, which stands for "evidence-informed health policy-making (EIHP)" in Persian, is a national project to draw a roadmap for strengthening EIHP in Iran. As a part of SASHA, this research aimed to develop evidence-based and context-aware policy options for increasing the capacity of decision-makers to apply EIHP in Iran. This was a qualitative study, which was informed by a literature review of pull efforts' capacity building programs. Based on the review, we developed policy options and validated them through an expert panel that involved twelve experts. Data were analyzed using a content analysis method. We extracted data from 11 articles. The objectives of capacity building programs were: single-skill development, personal/professional development, and organizational development. According to these objectives, the contents and training methods of the programs vary. Capacity building programs have shown positive impacts on individual knowledge/attitudes to use EIHP. However, the impacts of programs at the organizational or the health system level remain under-researched. We followed several threads from the literature review through to the expert panel that included training the management team, instead of training managers, training for problem-solving skills, and designing tailored programs. Barriers of capacity building for EIHP regard the context of the health system (weak accountability and the widespread conflict of interest) and healthcare organizational structures (decision support systems, knowledge management infrastructures, and lack of management team). Experts suggested interventions on the barriers, particularly on resolving the conflict of interests before launching new programs. A proposed framework to increase the capacity of health policy-makers incorporates strategies at three levels: capacity building program, organizational structure, and health system context. To prepare the context of Iranian healthcare organizations for capacity building programs, the conflict of interests needs to be resolved, decision-makers should be made more accountable, and healthcare organizations need to provide more knowledge management infrastructures and decision support systems.

Constructing the advanced nurse practitioner identity in the healthcare system: A discourse analysis.

To explore how Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANP) are positioned within current nursing and health system structures in Ireland by making explicit the discourses that construct ANPs' identities and how they both enable and constrain their roles. Ambiguity and confusion characterize debates about the ANP role having a profound impact on ANP identity and how they realize their roles. Without clear definitions, boundaries are difficult to ascertain, the full potential of the ANP is not realized and, consequently, ANPs are underutilized. Although this study is relevant outside Ireland's borders, it is of particular concern in the Irish setting as current policy aims to increase ANP numbers. A qualitative discourse analysis using Gee's Tools of Inquiry. Data were collected between April 2019 and January 2020 through seven in-depth interviews and four focus groups and analysed using Gee's Tools of Inquiry. Participants included ANPs, nurses, doctors and allied healthcare professionals. Five key discourses emerged. Language-in-use established, first, that ANPs add value to the healthcare system and, second, highlighted the centrality of nursing to ANPs' identity. The third discourse builds an educated and skilled identity for ANPs, one that, however, lacked the expertise and influence of their medical colleagues. The fourth discourse constructs an identity for ANPs as medical substitutes, lesser roles, yet innovative additions to the system and a threat to existing structures. The final discourse constructs tensions between independence and autonomy, on the one hand, and control, on the other. This study alerts healthcare professionals to ways in which discourses influence opinion and frame ANPs' identity. Healthcare professionals should challenge Conversations and Discourses that disparage the ANP role. ANPs need to clearly articulate their role, the value that it adds to the healthcare system and demonstrate how it aligns with and complements other healthcare professionals' roles. By identifying and critiquing extant Discourses and Conversations, healthcare professionals, and health system leaders and managers will gain a better understanding of the issues that both enable and constrain the ANP role.

Community-level integration of health services and community health workers’ agency in Malawi

Despite a large literature on integration of health services, there is a dearth of scholarship assessing service integration in its totality at the community level. Similarly, across the wide evidence base on community health workers (CHWs), there is little that analyses the ways in which they interact with both formal and informal structures and how these interactions shape their agency and ultimately the delivery of integrated services. A better understanding of agency in the work of CHWs would help health systems, policy makers and practitioners to better design and support the delivery of community-level integrated health packages to improve health outcomes.In this study, we explored the agency of CHWs in Malawi known as Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs). We used qualitative methods: participant observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions between July and October 2018. Overall, the ethnographic study utilised actors-centred frameworks (structuration theory and street-level bureaucracy). The study findings unravel the complexities involving HSAs’ agency shaped by health system structures (staffing, infrastructure, drugs, and supplies) and informal structures (community relations, local power structures, gendered-household relations) which narrowed or widened their discretionary decision-making space. The flexibility of HSAs was a distinctive feature in their work, but they developed other coping mechanisms: task shifting, teamwork, creative community engagement, and referrals to deliver integrated maternal and child health services.HSAs' unique position as community-based providers meant they needed to consider diverse factors that constrained or facilitated their work. Overall, we argue that HSAs need to be fully involved in the design of community-level integrated health programmes. There should be a consideration to address both informal and formal structures that together shape agency. Additionally, CHWs’ flexibility and agency to make locally informed decisions must be protected and maintained because it enhances their ability to deliver essential health services.

Integrated community based human and animal syndromic surveillance in Adadle district of the Somali region of Ethiopia

The economy of Ethiopia largely depends on agriculture and roughly 80% of the households have direct contact with domestic animals which make the community vulnerable to zoonotic diseases, especially in pastoral areas like the Somali Regional State (SRS) of Ethiopia. However, in addition to low reporting rates, especially in livestock, there is also lack of coordination between public health and animal health surveillance and there is no linkage between public health system and animal health system and mechanism or structure for sharing information on zoonotic diseases in SRS. In view of these challenges, a small scale study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of mobile communication in the early detection of human and animal syndromes in remote pastoral areas including where there are no human and animal health facilities by engaging local communities in the diseases surveillance. MethodA small scale study, testing a community based human and animal syndromic surveillance was conducted from August 2017 to February 2018 in 20 villages in four Kebeles of Adadle district in the SRS with an estimated 1390 households and 112,850 livestock. The selected community leaders were trained on disease surveillance and detection. The communication was done by direct calls. Two dollars per month were provided to the village leaders recruited for the surveillance. ResultsA total of 904 and 671 human and animal syndrome cases were reported in seven months of the study period. In addition to syndromes, suspected anthrax, sheep and goat pox (SGP), rabies, salmonellosis and mass abortion outbreaks were reported in animals. In humans, suspected cholera and chicken pox outbreaks were reported. Furthermore, tuberculosis and malaria cases were also confirmed in the study villages. In humans, gastrointestinal tract (GIT) disorder was the most common syndrome observed, which constituted (42.8%) of all syndromes, followed by respiratory disorder (37.8%) and febrile illness (15.5%). In livestock, cattle contributed (40.8%) of all cases of illness, while sheep, goats and camels contributed 24.1%, 18% and 17% of the cases respectively. Responses were organized for emergency treatment and vaccination campaigns against certain suspected disease outbreaks and emergencies such as SGP and cholera. ConclusionThis study suggests that engaging and empowering the village local leaders in disease surveillance in pastoral setting areas, including where there are no human and animal health facilities, coupled with mobile technologies (non-smart phone), would improve early detection and response to human and animal health events including zoonotic emergencies, and consequently improve the reporting rate at district, regional and national level. However, the collaboration between sectors (human health and animals health) and the capacity to respond to zoonotic diseases and etiological identification are crucial elements for effective integrated human and animals disease surveillance and response.

Health care utilization and costs associated with direct-acting antivirals for patients with substance use disorders and chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Patients with substance use disorders (SUD) and chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) have limited access to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) due to multilevel issues related to providers (eg, concern about reinfection); patients (eg, refusal); payers (eg, prior authorization); and health system structure, although clinical guidelines recommend timely DAA treatment for patients with SUD and HCV. Effects of DAAs on real-world health care utilization and costs among these patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in medical service utilization and costs related to liver, SUD, and all-cause morbidity in patients with SUD and HCV treated with DAAs (DAA group) vs not treated with DAAs (non-DAA group). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims databases (2012-2018) for newly diagnosed HCV treatment-naive adults with SUD. We used difference-in-differences analyses, stratified by cirrhosis status, to determine the adjusted ratio of rate ratio (RoRR) to assess the difference in the relative changes from the pre- to posttreatment periods between the 2 groups. RESULTS: 6,266 patients with SUD and HCV were identified. Of these patients who also had cirrhosis (n = 607), 49% (n = 298) initiated DAA therapy for HCV, whereas of those without cirrhosis (n = 5,659), 22% (n = 1,219) initiated DAAs. For patients with cirrhosis (n = 607), the liver-related costs decreased by $6,213 (95% CI = -$8,571, -$3,856) for the DAA group and $1,585 (95% CI = -$4,659, $1,490) for the non-DAA group. The relative decreases in the rate of liver-related costs were larger for the DAA group than for the non-DAA group, and the relative changes between groups were significantly different (RoRR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.19-0.73). There was no difference in the relative changes after DAAs in the rate of SUD-related visits/costs or all-cause costs between the 2 groups. For patients without cirrhosis (n = 5,659), a similar association was observed. Besides, the relative decreases in the rate of SUD-related emergency department (ED) visits (RoRR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.38-0.77); SUD-related long-term care visits (RoRR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13-0.73); all-cause ED visits (RoRR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.64-0.88); and all-cause long term-care visits (RoRR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.18-0.72) were larger in the DAA group than in the non-DAA group. CONCLUSIONS: DAAs are associated with a significant decrease in the rate of SUD-related ED visits and liver-related costs without increasing the rate of all-cause costs among patients with SUD and HCV, suggesting that the benefits of DAAs extended beyond liver-related outcomes, especially in this disadvantaged population. DISCLOSURES: Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health (K01DA045618). The funder did not have a role in the design, the execution, the analyses, the interpretation of the data, or the decision to submit the results of this study. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Point of care ultrasound in acutely breathless patients-A qualitative study of the enablers and challenges in a teaching hospital in Kenya

Objectives: Acute breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom experienced by patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Adoption of clinician-performed bedside ultrasound could promote accurate, early diagnosis and treatment to acutely breathless patients. This may be particularly pertinent in low resource settings with limited human resources and lack of access to advanced (gold standard) diagnostic testing. The aim of the study was to explore the experience of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) users in the emergency department, and to understand the facilitators and constraints of PoCUS incorporation into patient investigation pathways. Materials and Methods: This was an exploratory qualitative study. Data collection entailed key informant interviews using a semi-structured interview guide between September 2019 and February 2020. Participants were purposively sampled according to role and responsibility in the acute care system at Kenyatta National Hospital, including front-line health practitioners and mid-level clinical hospital managers. Data collection proceeded until no new concepts emerged (thematic saturation). The analytical framework method was used for the thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Results: At individual level, the lack of training on the use of PoCUS, as well as fears and beliefs impacted on capability and motivation of the clinicians to perform PoCUS for clinical diagnosis. Hospital level influencers such as hospital norms, workloads, and staffing influenced the use of PoCUS by impacting on the clinician’s capability, motivation, and opportunity. General health system influencers such as relationships and power dynamics between clinical specialties and key stakeholders, and the lack of policy and practice guidelines challenged the uptake of the bedside ultrasound by the clinicians. Conclusion: Lack of PoCUS training for clinicians, limited resources and a fragmented health system structure impacted the clinician’s capability, motivation, and opportunity in performing PoCUS in diagnostics. PoCUS for diagnosis of acute breathlessness requires: (1) Well-maintained and accessible equipment; (2) highly trained individuals with time to perform the examination with access to ongoing support for the operators; and (3) finally, researchers must more accurately identify the optimal scope of ultrasound examination, the diagnostic benefits, and the opportunity costs. All three will be required to ensure patient’s benefit.

Risk-Stratified Pathways for Cancer Survivorship Care: Insights from a Deliberative Multi-Stakeholder Consultation.

Risk-stratified pathways of survivorship care seek to optimize coordination between cancer specialists and primary care physicians based on the whole person needs of the individual. While the principle is supported by leading cancer institutions, translating knowledge to practice confronts a lack of clarity about the meaning of risk stratification, uncertainties around the expectations the model holds for different actors, and health system structures that impede communication and coordination across the care continuum. These barriers must be better understood and addressed to pave the way for future implementation. Recognizing that an innovation is more likely to be adopted when user experience is incorporated into the planning process, a deliberative consultation was held as a preliminary step to developing a pilot project of risk-stratified pathways for patients transitioning from specialized oncology teams to primary care providers. This article presents findings from the deliberative consultation that sought to understand the perspectives of cancer specialists, primary care physicians, oncology nurses, allied professionals, cancer survivors and researchers regarding the following questions: what does a risk stratified model of cancer survivorship care mean to care providers and users? What are the prerequisites for translating risk stratification into practice? What challenges are involved in establishing these prerequisites? The multi-stakeholder consultation provides empirical data to guide actions that support the development of risk-stratified pathways to coordinate survivorship care.

Acute day units in non-residential settings for people in mental health crisis: the AD-CARE mixed-methods study

Background For people in mental health crisis, acute day units provide daily structured sessions and peer support in non-residential settings as an alternative to crisis resolution teams. Objectives To investigate the provision, effectiveness, intervention acceptability and re-admission rates of acute day units. Design Work package 1 – mapping and national questionnaire survey of acute day units. Work package 2.1 – cohort study comparing outcomes during a 6-month period between acute day unit and crisis resolution team participants. Work package 2.2 – qualitative interviews with staff and service users of acute day units. Work package 3 – a cohort study within the Mental Health Minimum Data Set exploring re-admissions to acute care over 6 months. A patient and public involvement group supported the study throughout. Setting and participants Work package 1 – all non-residential acute day units (NHS and voluntary sector) in England. Work packages 2.1 and 2.2 – four NHS trusts with staff, service users and carers in acute day units and crisis resolution teams. Work package 3 – all individuals using mental health NHS trusts in England. Results Work package 1 – we identified 27 acute day units in 17 out of 58 trusts. Acute day units are typically available on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., providing a wide range of interventions and a multidisciplinary team, including clinicians, and having an average attendance of 5 weeks. Work package 2.1 – we recruited 744 participants (acute day units, n = 431; crisis resolution teams, n = 312). In the primary analysis, 21% of acute day unit participants (vs. 23% of crisis resolution team participants) were re-admitted to acute mental health services over 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the fully adjusted model (acute day unit hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 1.14; p = 0.20), with highly heterogeneous results between trusts. Acute day unit participants had higher satisfaction and well-being scores and lower depression scores than crisis resolution team participants. The health economics analysis found no difference in resource use or cost between the acute day unit and crisis resolution team groups in the fully adjusted analysis. Work package 2.2 – 36 people were interviewed (acute day unit staff, n = 12; service users, n = 21; carers, n = 3). There was an overwhelming consensus that acute day units are highly valued. Service users found the high amount of contact time and staff continuity, peer support and structure provided by acute day units particularly beneficial. Staff also valued providing continuity, building strong therapeutic relationships and providing a variety of flexible, personalised support. Work package 3 – of 231,998 individuals discharged from acute care (crisis resolution team, acute day unit or inpatient ward), 21.4% were re-admitted for acute treatment within 6 months, with women, single people, people of mixed or black ethnicity, those living in more deprived areas and those in the severe psychosis care cluster being more likely to be re-admitted. Little variation in re-admissions was explained at the trust level, or between trusts with and trusts without acute day units (adjusted odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.15). Limitations In work package 1, some of the information is likely to be incomplete as a result of trusts’ self-reporting. There may have been recruitment bias in work packages 2.1 and 2.2. Part of the health economics analysis relied on clinical Health of the Nations Outcome Scale ratings. The Mental Health Minimum Data Set did not contain a variable identifying acute day units, and some covariates had a considerable number of missing data. Conclusions Acute day units are not provided routinely in the NHS but are highly valued by staff and service users, giving better outcomes in terms of satisfaction, well-being and depression than, and no significant differences in risk of re-admission or increased costs from, crisis resolution teams. Future work should investigate wider health and care system structures and the place of acute day units within them; the development of a model of best practice for acute day units; and staff turnover and well-being (including the impacts of these on care). Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Childbirth violence-based negative health consequences: a qualitative study in Iranian women

BackgroundViolation of mothers' rights during childbirth is a global problem that often silently torments women in many parts of the world. The aim of this study was to explore negative health consequences due to childbirth violence based on mothers' perceptions and experiences.MethodsTo achieve rich data, an exploratory qualitative study was carried out in 2019 on 26 women with childbirth violence experience who had given birth in hospitals of Ilam, Iran. Data were collected using semi‑structure in‑depth interviews (IDIs) and a purposive sampling. Participants were asked about their experiences and perceptions of negative health consequences due to childbirth violence. Data were analyzed by conventional content analysis based on Graneheim and Lundman approach. MAXQDA (v.18) software was used for better data management.ResultsFinal codes were classified into 9 sub-categories and 3 main categories including maternal and newborn injuries, weakening of family ties, sense of distrust and hatred. These findings emerged the theme: negative health consequences.ConclusionsThis study broke the silence of abused mothers during childbirth and expressed the perspective of mothers who suffered childbirth violence as a routine phenomenon in maternal care, and a serious threat to the health of mothers, newborns and families. Findings of this study can be a warning for maternity health system, monitoring and support structures as well as health policy-makers to seriously plan to prevent and eliminate this problem.

Physician induced demand for knee replacement surgery in Iran

BackgroundThe structure of the Iranian health system has raised this hypothesis that a part of the Knee Replacement Surgery (KRS) services are provided due to Physician-Induced Demand (PID).MethodsThis paper used an unbalanced individual panel data covering the steady-state 15,729 KRSs performed by 995 surgeons provided by the Armed Forces Insurance Organization at the provincial level over the 60 months (2014–2018). We use a generalized method of moment’s system (GMM-SYS) to obtain consistent and asymptotically efficient estimates, which provide a vital instrument for our dynamic panel data.ResultsThe outcomes show that with unequal increasing orthopedic surgeons to population ratio, both the number and size of KRS services were increased significantly at a 1 % level. Given that the positive elasticity obtained for the service size was significantly larger than the number of services, the findings give strong support for the existence of PID in the Iran system for KRS care. Also, the raw and population-adjusted number of KRS, cost, and the surgery per active physician increased significantly at the monthly province level.ConclusionsThis is the first time that the existence of PID in the Iranian health system is investigated using approved econometric models. The findings indicate that the health system structure has been provided the conditions for aggressive, costly, and high-risk services such as KRS to be exposed to PID.

Control of antimicrobial resistance in Cameroon: Feasibility of implementing the National Action Plan.

Rising antimicrobial resistance is a major threat worldwide. WHO has developed a Global Action Plan and has urged all countries to develop and implement a National Action Plan. We analysed the implementation of the Cameroon National Action Plan by identifying the prioritised activities and assessing possible challenges which could limit implementation. We conducted a review of national documents on the control of antimicrobial resistance, including regulations, policies and guidelines and assessed the health system structure. Publications and other supporting documents were obtained by a systematic literature search. We applied the policy analysis triangle framework and the theory of change to analyse the National Action Plan, actors involved and the process of implementation. The National Action Plan consisted of six strategic objectives, with the first five being a direct translation of the five pillars of the Global Action Plan. The related activities were to be implemented using a phased approach with allocated targets for each year. Several gaps were identified. There was no timeline of activities set per year, the chronology of activities was not consistent, there were no activities or objectives to ensure the sustainability of the National Action Plan like creating awareness on antimicrobial resistance and the indicators for impact evaluation were not included. Among the actors involved, the Ministry of Public Health had the highest interest in the implementation as the lead stakeholder to oversee the overall implementation. However, there was no clear source of funding, and stakeholders at the primary level of the various sectors responsible for implementation were not clearly defined. Despite adequate multisectoral collaboration within the prioritised activities relevant to Cameroon, more is needed for effective implementation of the National Action Plan. The timeline of the different activities, as well as the involvement of key stakeholders at the primary level, needs to be improved. The government's overall commitment to healthcare should be increased and implementation of an action plan should commence at the district or regional level, while challenges in mobilising the necessary funds need to be overcome.

Reconceptualizing Care Transitions Research From the Patient Perspective.

Reconceptualizing Care Transitions Research From the Patient Perspective.

Structures of paediatric pain management: a PERUKI service evaluation study

BackgroundPain is very common in childhood emergency department (ED) attendances, but is under-recognised and undertreated. Sequential national paediatric analgesia audits demonstrate suboptimal outcomes in several domains. The Donabedian framework examines...

Synergies and fragmentation in country level policy and program agenda setting, formulation and implementation for Global Health agendas: a case study of health security, universal health coverage, and health promotion in Ghana and Sierra Leone

BackgroundGlobal health agendas have in common the goal of contributing to population health outcome improvement. In theory therefore, whenever possible, country level policy and program agenda setting, formulation and implementation towards their attainment should be synergistic such that efforts towards one agenda promote efforts towards the other agendas. Observation suggests that this is not what happens in practice. Potential synergies are often unrealized and fragmentation is not uncommon. In this paper we present findings from an exploration of how and why synergies and fragmentation occur in country level policy and program agenda setting, formulation and implementation for the global health agendas of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), Health Security (HS) and Health Promotion (HP) in Ghana and Sierra Leone. Our study design was a two country case study. Data collection involved document reviews and Key Informant interviews with national and sub-national level decision makers in both countries between July and December 2019. Additionally, in Ghana a stakeholder workshop in December 2019 was used to validate the draft analysis and conclusions.ResultsNational and global context, country health systems leadership and structure including resources were drivers of synergies and fragmentation. How global as well as country level actors mobilized power and exercised agency in policy and program agenda setting and implementation processes within country were also important drivers.ConclusionsThere is potential in both countries to pull towards synergies and push against fragmentation in agenda setting, formulation and implementation of global health agendas despite the resource and other structural constraints. It however requires political and bureaucratic prioritization of synergies, as well as skilled leadership. It also requires considerable mobilization of country level actor exercise of agency to counter sometimes daunting contextual, systems and structural constraints.

Deliberative Appraisal Processes in Health Technology Assessment


 Deliberation — the bringing together of individuals with multiple perspectives, experiences, and values to critically examine evidence, share reasons and rationales, and reach a decision on a course of action — occurs at all stages of the health technology assessment (HTA) process.
 The focus of this report is on deliberation at the committee appraisal stage of HTA.
 The objectives are to review and conceptualize the evidence and key considerations for deliberative processes at the committee appraisal stage of HTA and the available guidance for assessing the quality of the deliberative process at this stage.
 National and international practices for deliberative processes at the committee appraisal stage of HTA vary depending on contextual considerations (e.g., type of health technology and the medical condition being treated), the mandate of the HTA organization, health system and funding structures, and societal values.
 Each aspect of the deliberative appraisal process should be rooted in the values of the health system and be principled, clear, transparent, purposeful, and reasoned.

Assessing the responsiveness of out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure to macro-fiscal factors and different health financing systems: evidence from the European and OECD area

PurposeIn this paper, the authors assess the responsiveness of OOP healthcare expenditure to macro-fiscal factors, as well as to tax-based, SHI, mixed systems and voluntary PHI financing. Although the relationship between OOP expenditure, macroeconomy, aggregate public and PHI financing is well documented in the existing empirical literature, little is known for the impact of several macro-fiscal drivers and the existing health financing arrangements associated with voluntary PHI on OOP expenditure.Design/methodology/approachThe authors gather panel data by applying three official organizations’ databases. They elaborate static and dynamic panel data methodology to a dataset of 49 European and OECD countries from 2000 to 2015.FindingsThe authors’ findings do not indicate a considerable impact of GDP growth and general government debt as a share of GDP on OOP payments. Unemployment rate presents as a positive driver of OOP payments in all three compulsory national health systems post to the 2008 economic crisis. OOP payments are significantly influenced by countries’ fiscal capacity to increase general government expenditure to GDP in SHI and mixed health systems. Additionally, study findings present that government health financing, irrespective of the different health systems structure characteristics, and OOP healthcare payments follow different directions. Voluntary PHI financing considerably counteracts OOP payments only in tax-based health systems.Practical implicationsIn the backdrop of a new economic crisis associated to the COVID-19 epidemic, health policy planners have to deal with the emerging unprecedented challenges in financing of health systems, especially for these economies that have to face the fiscal capacity constraints owing to the 2008 financial crisis and its severe recession.Originality/valueTo the best of authors’ knowledge, there is no empirical consensus on the effects of macro-fiscal parameters, different compulsory health systems financing associated with the parallel voluntary PHI institution funding on OOP expenditure, for the majority of European and OECD settings.

A112 THE IMPACT OF CENTRAL COORDINATION ON ENDOSCOPY EFFICIENCY

BackgroundThe impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have been far reaching and have necessitated many changes to healthcare delivery. At the QEII Health Sciences Center physical space limitations for patient check-in and recovery have restricted outpatient endoscopy to 3 of 4 available endoscopy suites. On June 1, 2020 a new system of central endoscopy triage and coordination for the Division of Digestive Care and Endoscopy (DC&E) was implemented in an effort to increase efficiency and maintain patient access to endoscopy. The components of the RESET (Re-introduce Endoscopy Safely and EfficienTly) Plan included a) a new endoscopy coordinator role to manage a common endoscopy waitlist, endoscopist schedules, and booking clerks, b) a modified triage system to improve waitlist consistency, c) a common endoscopy waitlist with patients booked in the next available appointment regardless of endoscopist, d) discontinuation of fixed endoscopy slots for endoscopists, and e) appointment scheduling no sooner than 4-weeks in advance to minimize no-shows and last-minute cancellations.AimsThe aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the RESET Plan on the efficiency of DC&E endoscopy.MethodsA retrospective pre- and post-implementation study evaluating the volume and efficiency of outpatient endoscopy before and after implementation of the RESET Plan. The Pre-RESET period included all procedures performed from June 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019. The Post-RESET period included all procedures performed from June 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020. A separate endoscopy suite and triage system is used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and these cases were excluded. Early effectiveness outcomes were reported including a comparison of the number of endoscopic procedures per week and per list, pre- and post- implementation. Data analysis was primarily descriptive with data expressed as frequencies, means (SD), and proportions (%). Exploratory group comparisons were performed using independent-samples T-Test.ResultsDuring the 5-month Pre-RESET period, 2203 endoscopic procedures were performed. During the Post-RESET period a total of 1920 procedures were performed. Due to pandemic restrictions, there was a 29% decrease in available endoscopy lists from 2019 to 2020. There was a 24% increase in the number procedures performed per endoscopy list, from 6.4 to 8.0 (p=0.004, 95% CI 0.52–2.53), pre- and post-RESET.ConclusionsWhile the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare delivery, it has also provided an opportunity to implement health system structure and process changes. The RESET Plan resulted in significant gains in efficiency which largely offset losses in endoscopy throughput imposed by COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Future research will determine what patient and health system factors most significantly impact system efficiency as well as the cost-effectiveness of the RESET Plan.Funding AgenciesCAG

Iran's National Health Information Network: Developing an Architectural Model

Aim: This study was conducted to develop a model for the architecture of Iran's National Health Information Network (NHIN). Method: In this study, based on the literature review, the necessary information was obtained about the concept of the architecture of the NHIN; then, documents related to NHIN architecture in the United States and the United Kingdom were collected. In the second stage, according to the information obtained in the previous stage and considering the structure of Iran's health system, an architectural model for the NHIN of Iran was presented. Then, the Delphi technique was used to validate the proposed architecture. Results: The proposed architecture of the NHIN of Iran includes three dimensions of nodes or network members, ' 'member's interfaces, and finally, communication with the environment (confidentiality and security). 90% of the experts evaluated each dimension of the proposed architecture on an acceptable scale. In general,, the proposed architecture was evaluated by 90% of experts on an acceptable scale. Conclusion: In proposing the architecture of Iran's NHIN, attention was paid to the experiences of the two leading countries, approaches to NHIN design, and the structure of Iran's health system. However, the proposed architecture is critical and can be used for the countries whose health system structure is almost similar to Iran.