Health-related Quality Of Life Data Collection Research Articles

Use of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurements to Estimate Individuals’ Health on Screening

Objectives : to investigate the utility of assessing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in a large group of subjects participating in a screening program for aneurysm and the relationship between HRQoL, diagnosis of aneurysm and related risk factors.Methods : subjects involved in this screening program were submitted the EQ-5D questionnaire to report their own HRQoL. HRQoL was reported also a second time by the subjects who were diagnosed with aneurysm during screening and who returned for a monitoring follow up visit a few months later. We evaluated compliance with HRQoL data collection and performed multiple regression analyses in order to investigate the possible relationship between demographic and clinical data with HRQoL.Results : 1,633 subjects screened (6.1% diagnosed with aneurysm) and 125 subjects diagnosed with aneurysm and attending a follow-up visit reported their HRQoL. Completion of the EQ-5D questionnaire was well accepted by both physicians and subjects undergoing screening. HRQoL was not significantly different between the screening and follow - up visits, on adjusting for age and sex. At the screening visit, HRQoL was associated with ASA class, heart condition, BMI and respiratory diseases. No associations were found at the follow-up visit.Conclusion : Assessing HRQoL in screening programs is feasible and well accepted and add useful information on health of large numbers of subjects from general population. This could be considered as a routine approach to optimizing the informative role of screening programs in guiding other investigations or interventions.

EInfrastructure for Outcome and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Radiation Oncology

Even after successfully completing treatment for cancer, many patients continue to experience a broad spectrum of side effects for months or potentially lifelong. Therefore, comprehensive and accurate assessments of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and comparative effectiveness of different treatment options are increasingly important as outcome endpoints in the curative management of cancer. In response to this societal need, we took advantage of the information and mobile technologies along with computer science to provide a Web-based infrastructure for collecting physician reported radiotherapy data and advanced technical resources necessary to improve the quality of HRQoL data collection.

Applying cognitive design principles to formatting HRQOL instruments.

Researchers developing or using health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments can benefit from knowledge of state-of-the-art formatting methods for self-administered questionnaires. Three objectives in formatting design are: (1) to reduce errors in respondent navigation through the questionnaire that lead to item non-response and question misinterpretation; (2) to reduce respondent and administrative burden; and (3) to enhance respondent motivation in question answering and compliance with the request to participate. Based on an extensive literature review to identify techniques that have been shown to meet these objectives, we developed specific guidelines for HRQOL instruments concerning all aspects of questionnaire formatting. These guidelines represent well-motivated recommendations for improving HRQOL instruments, although their overall impact has not been empirically tested. We applied the guidelines to several HRQOL instruments that are widely used internationally, and obtained approval from the developers for all formatting changes to their instruments. Applying cognitive design principles and empirically substantiated formatting techniques produces an HRQOL instrument formatting with six critical attributes: simple, consistent, organized, natural, clear and attractive. The present paper contributes to the emerging research literature on the cognitive processes by which respondents answer HRQOL questions and demonstrates how 'cognitive aspects of survey methodology' research can improve HRQOL data collection efforts.

Defining an international research agenda for quality of life in men with prostate cancer

While the traditional goal in the management of patients with prostate cancer has been to maximize survival, the recent advent of the medical outcomes movement has underscored the importance of patient-centered issues, such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In this paper we present a comprehensive approach to the study of HRQOL in men with prostate cancer. We begin by defining HRQOL in general, discussing its measurement, and placing it in the context of prostate cancer. We then describe the primary goals of HRQOL research and present examples of validated instruments. We finish by proposing a quality of life research agenda for the next two decades. Contemporary perspectives on HRQOL are based on the World Health Organization's definition of health as not merely the absence of disease, but as a state of physical, emotional, and social well-being. HRQOL measurement must adhere to the strict methodological principles of survey psychometrics and is best accomplished with any of several validated instruments. Once collected, HRQOL information is useful for prostate cancer patients facing difficult treatment decisions. A solid foundation for HRQOL research has been built in early- and late-stage prostate cancer. It includes the development of new instruments and the establishment of descriptive data. This groundwork will allow investigators to address more complex research issues, such as interpreting interactions among HRQOL domains, presenting HRQOL data to future patients, optimally timing HRQOL data collection, uncovering innate and alterable factors that influence HRQOL, and exploring the intercultural nuances of HRQOL assessment.

Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life.

This study assessed patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor (TSVM) for the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A software program was developed for a computerized form of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, the QLQ-C30. One hundred and seventy-eight patients completed the QLQ-C30, followed by a structured interview designed to assess perceived difficulties with the use of the TSVM. Patients were asked to evaluate the ease of use of different aspects of the TSVM system (using the touch-sensitive screen, entering the patient identification number, reading the screen and following the on-screen instructions). The majority of patients found all aspects of the TSVM system 'very easy' to use. A few patients (1-2%) admitted finding any aspect of the TSVM use 'somewhat difficult' and none ranked any aspect as 'very difficult'. There were no unanswered items in the QLQ-C30. All patients found the amount of time spent on answering the questionnaire acceptable, (the mean time to complete was 6.8 min with a median of 5 min) and 96% stated they were willing to complete a similar questionnaire on a future occasion. From the patients' perspective the TSVM system appears to be a highly acceptable approach for the collection of HRQoL data in clinical practice.

Base-line quality-of-life assessment in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) is a large, multicenter chemoprevention trial testing the efficacy of the antiestrogen drug tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer and coronary heart disease in healthy women at high risk of breast cancer. The BCPT evolved from a series of prior studies in early stage breast cancer demonstrating the efficacy of tamoxifen in the prevention of systemic breast cancer recurrence and in the reduction of contralateral breast cancers. The purpose of this article is to describe the methodologic considerations in the collection of health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) data in the BCPT and to present base-line HRQL data on the first 9749 participants. An HRQL questionnaire that included the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, a symptom checklist, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form (MOS-SF-36), and the MOS sexual problems questions was completed by participants in the BCPT at base line (prior to random assignment). Medical and demographic information, as well as projected risk of breast cancer, were collected as part of study eligibility. Descriptive and correlational data were examined for these study participants. BCPT participants report high levels of functioning compared with U.S. general population norms but still report an average of 8.9 distinct symptoms during the past 4 weeks. Depression is less prevalent among the participants than in community samples, which reflects the exclusion of clinically depressed individuals. Sixty-five percent reported being sexually active in the past 6 months, with an age-related decline in sexual activity. Younger women reported fewer sexual problems than older women. There is a strong correlation between the two mental health measures, moderate to weak correlations between HRQL scales and levels of self-reported symptoms, and only weak correlations between measures of breast cancer risk and HRQL scales. The MOS-SF-36 scores were examined for three consecutive recruitment samples (0-6 months, 7-12 months, and 13-20 months), and the base-line scores were slightly better for the earliest group of participants. This article demonstrates the feasibility of collecting HRQL data in a large, multicenter, chemoprevention trial for women at high risk of breast cancer. The successful integration of HRQL data collection into this clinical trial attests to its value as a safety-monitoring end point and as an explicit and measurable outcome for the entire trial. HRQL data are important for studies in which healthy populations are involved and in which the potential for decrements in quality of life are real or perceived.

Integrating health-related quality of life into cross-national clinical trials

When planning to implement health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessment in a multinational clinical trial, there are at least four general considerations: the natural history of the disease or condition, the characteristics of the population, the treatment under consideration, and the structure and function of the clinical trial organization. Each of these considerations must be addressed simultaneously when planning, implementing and analysing a cross-national clinical trial. There are five relevant polar components of the natural history of a given disease or condition: (1) time frame (acute versus chronic); (2) life threat (yes versus no); (3) symptomatology (present versus absent); (4) symptom expression (episodic versus constant); and (5) functional impact (present versus absent). Differences in population characteristics, (e.g., age, conditions, co-morbidity), embedded within any cross-national trial, must be addressed conceptually prior to initiating the trial, methodologically when planning implementation, and statistically after the collection of the data. In terms of treatment, issues such as adverse and positive effects and timing of effects must be considered. The methods entailed in planning, implementing and analysing HRQL data will depend upon the degree of centralization of personnel and resources within any given clinical trial. The range of possibilities runs from complete centralization, in which all planning and coordination of data collection and transmittal is done by one office, to complete decentralization, in which the work is distributed to participating sites and interested investigators. Finally, successful implementation of HRQL data collection is enhanced by heightening awareness of the importance of, and value in, assessing HRQL in clinical trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)