Canadian Health Regions Research Articles

Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA)

Background: Program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) is a framework for setting priorities in health care, used internationally over the last 25 years in Britain, Australia and New Zealand. However, the framework has undergone limited evaluation, and insight into how such evaluation should even take place is not found in the literature. Methods: Seven PBMA case studies were conducted in three Canadian health regions to examine the feasibility of applying the PBMA framework. Structured follow-up surveys with the users of the framework were carried out following the priority setting exercises. Results: The PBMA framework was feasibly implemented in three regionalized contexts and was generally viewed favorably by managers and clinicians who participated in the case studies. Numerous methodological lessons were learned and it was found that successful implementation hinges on organizational context. An empirically derived model describing PBMA is outlined and put forth as an evaluation framework for future exercises. Conclusions: Comparisons to the health care management literature indicate that the derived PBMA model is a novel addition to this broader literature. Overall, managers in health organizations internationally would be well-served to consider PBMA to aid regional decision-making processes, but should do so with explicit consideration of the context in which such activity is to occur.

Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makers

Introduction: The aims of this study were, within three Canadian health regions, to identify existing resource management techniques, to elicit ways in which the current process of setting priorities could be improved and to determine if an economic framework, used internationally, would have merit in Canada. Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 62 of 73 key decision makers. This sample included all senior executives and medical directors involved in setting priorities. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were utilised. Results: Key decision makers reported that a clear process of setting priorities does not exist. Allocation of resources generally occurs on the basis of historical trends; only 22% of participants stated that the process works well. Respondents were critical of the lack of transparency and a lack of meaningful inclusion of physicians in the priority setting process. Overall, 92% of respondents indicated that program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) would be an appropriate and useful priority setting framework. Conclusions: Given the political and historical influence in the process of priority setting and resource allocation, an evidence-based approach, like PBMA which explicitly attempts to identify ways of maximising health benefit within a limited budget, should have merit in the new regional structure in Canada.

The Use of Population Health and Health Promotion Research by Health Regions in Canada

This study examined the use of population health and health promotion (PH&HP) research by health regions in Canada. An 11-item survey was faxed to 137 (of 140) health regions. Eighty-three completed questionnaires were returned (60.8%). Results indicate that while research, in general, plays more than a moderate role in the majority of participating health regions, PH&HP research is not used frequently. The most frequent uses of PH&HP research include the development of health goals and objectives, the development of programs and services, and resource allocation. Health regions most frequently obtain PH&HP research from their own staff and from government departments. University-based researchers are not a commonly used source. This study provides a descriptive overview of health regions' engagement in evidence-based decision making related to PH&HP issues, and points to a number of strategies that both health regions and researchers can employ to enhance the use of PH&HP research by health regions.

Enhanced Surveillance of Acute Hepatitis B and C in Four Health Regions in Canada, 1998 TO 1999

To assess the incidence and risk factors for acute hepatitis B and acute hepatitis C in a defined Canadian population. An enhanced surveillance system was established in October 1998 to identify cases of acute hepatitis B and C infections in four regions in Canada, with a total population of approximately 3.2 million people. Information on demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory results and potential risk factors was collected using predefined questionnaires. A total of 79 cases of acute hepatitis B and 102 cases of acute hepatitis C were identified from October 1998 to December 1999, resulting in an incidence rate of 2.3 and 2.9/100,000 person-years, respectively. Males had higher incidence rates than females. The incidence of acute hepatitis B peaked at age 30 to 39 years for both males and females, whereas acute hepatitis C peaked at 30 to 39 years for males and 15 to 29 years for females. At least 34% of acute hepatitis B and 63% of acute hepatitis C were associated with injection drug use. Persons who were 15 to 39 years of age were more likely to report injection drug use as a risk factor. Heterosexual contact was reported to be a risk factor for 36.6% of acute hepatitis B cases and 3.5% of acute hepatitis C cases. The surveillance provides national incidence estimates of clinically recognized acute hepatitis B and C. Both hepatitis B and C are important public health threats to Canadians. Prevention efforts for both diseases should focus on injection drug use, especially for people aged 15 to 39 years. Risky sexual behaviour is also a major concern in prevention of hepatitis B in Canada.

Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis: A Priority-Setting Framework for Canadian Regional Health Authorities

Health regions in Canada are responsible for meeting the needs of local populations with limited resources. However, relatively little attention has been given to this within-region resource allocation problem. An economic approach to needs assessment, namely program budgeting and marginal analysis, may be of benefit. Its potential for use in Canada is examined, in particular with examples from two Alberta health regions, the Calgary Regional Health Authority and the Chinook Health Region.

Patterns of improvisation for evidence‐based practice in clinical settings

This paper describes our experiences from a two‐year research study to introduce evidence‐based practice (EBP) through a set of electronic information tools into two Canadian health regions. The improvisational model of technological change by Orlikowski and Hofman (1997) is used to provide the conceptual foundations for understanding the pattern of evolution associated with the tools observed in these two settings over time. Key areas to consider when changing practice identified from this study are time availability, intended use, adequate training, clinical champions, work practice fit, system refinement, around‐the‐clock support and environment influence. Health organizations should also distinguish anticipated, emergent and opportunistic changes and improvise accordingly when introducing EBP information tools in a setting that is characteristically complex, dynamic and unpredictable.