Health Care Reform Research Articles

Future healthcare professionals on working conditions in Poland: perspective of medical university students.

Students of medical universities, future employees, will have an impact on the shaping healthcare system. It is important to know and understand their opinions on the factors affecting working conditions and, consequently, changes necessary to improve effectiveness of health care. Students' expectations can contribute to the changing working conditions for graduates and bring added value to health system redefinition. The study used factor analysis to check whether its use was justified. Reliability analysis was performed and structure indicators were determined for each question. The anonymous survey was conducted from September 2017 until March 2018; 1205 students were randomly selected for the sample. Eighty percent of the students declared interest in healthcare changes, >50% reported that the main factors influencing the work were competencies, financing, medical equipment and organization. Over 90% of the respondents indicated too long wait times for an appointment with a specialist and admission to hospital as the reason for the low efficiency of healthcare, whereas >80% of the survey participants considered insufficient funding to be a barrier. The need for changing the financing scheme was underlined by >90% of the students, and of health priorities by about 80%. Approximately 71% of the respondents were in favour of limiting the role of government in decision-making processes and introducing changes into the education system. Students' views on organizational and financial factors of working conditions can contribute to improvement in systemic solutions at both micro and macro levels. Limiting the role of politicians in planning and implementing reforms can motivate employees to be more creative and decisive. Analysis of opinions can bring added value to health policy and systemic changes and should be extended by further research results after the COVID-19 pandemic. Students' interest in healthcare reform encourages reflection on enriching education with managerial skills. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2024;75(4):321-332.

Brazil’s Unified Health System: the fight for a universal right in an unequal country

This article analyzes Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS), established by the 1988 Constitution. The article initially presents the previous trajectory of national health policy and the context of democratization in the 1980s, which favored health reform and created a public, universal, and comprehensive health system. It then explores the advances and contradictions recorded in more than three decades of implementation of the SUS. The main advances observed were the creation of institutional mechanisms compatible with the federative arrangement and social participation, political and administrative decentralization, the national expansion of access to health, changes in the health care model, including strengthening primary care, and improvements in health indicators. On the other hand, the persistence of structural problems and disputes between different health agendas, with differences between governments, led to contradictions in financing and public-private relations in health. Despite the differences between countries, the analysis of the Brazilian case provides lessons on the challenges in building universal health systems in Latin America.

The unfairness of place: A cultural history of the UK's ‘postcode lottery’

The 'postcode lottery' has become a dominant political framing for place-based health inequalities in Britain, used by patient groups, politicians and in media coverage of regional health and healthcare inequalities. Using newspapers, parliamentary material and health policy documents, this paper traces how this term has changed and expanded from its origins as a protest about access to new pharmaceutical treatments, to a broader commentary about geographical variations in the quality of NHS and other public services, health outcomes, and deprivation. It traces this emergence and evolution from its origins in the 1989-91 introduction of the 'internal market' and the 1994 reintroduction of the National Lottery, through to New Labour health reforms, the introduction of austerity, and the Levelling Up programme in the present day. This paper finds that the term's concern with unfairness has enabled its incorporation into a range of political positions, both as a defence of universalism against market-based reforms in the NHS, and to rationalise distinctions between 'unequal' and 'unfair' disparities in health outcomes. We conclude that understanding and addressing place based differences and inequalities in health, healthcare, and health outcomes may be aided through investigation of cultural ideas and values as well as the deep histories of place and local services.

Development of a practical framework and indicators for monitoring integrated long-term health and care needs and service use

This case study presents an evidence-building approach to support policy planning for integrated health and care delivery for older adults. We developed an integrated needs-assessment framework to monitor the complex long-term medical and care needs of older individuals, using routinely collected, standardized needs-assessment and utilization data from the public health and long-term care (LTC) insurance systems in South Korea. We also developed a set of misuse indicators and analyzed service utilization patterns, while accounting for their varying types of needs. Approximately 11 % of older Koreans were identified as having complex long-term medical and care needs, which were categorized into four distinct need groups. More than one-third of those in the higher-medical/lower-care needs group stayed in LTC hospitals for six months or more during the year, and about one-third of those in the higher-medical/higher-care needs group inappropriately resided in LTC facilities, where medical services are limited. The newly developed integrated needs-assessment framework and misuse indicator set provide practical tools for monitoring the extent and nature of complex needs, as well as patterns of over- or under-utilization of health and care services over time. The empirical evidence gathered here highlights the need for reforms in South Korea's health and LTC systems.

Informing policy with health labour market analysis to improve availability of family doctors in Tajikistan

BackgroundTajikistan has embarked on health reforms to orient the health system towards primary health care (PHC). The health labour market analysis (HLMA) was initiated by the Ministry of Health with the World Health Organization (WHO) on policy questions related to the PHC workforce team. This article presents the results with focus on family doctors as a critical part of the PHC team, providing lessons for strengthening family medicine and PHC in the European Region and central Asia.MethodsThe HLMA framework was used to guide the analysis. The data for analysis were provided by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of the Population of the Republic of Tajikistan. Descriptive means were used to analyse the data. A Technical Working Group guided the process.ResultsThere has been an increase in the number of health workers in the country over the last 7 years. However, there is a huge shortage of family doctors when compared with norms, with decreasing family doctor densities over the last 7 years. Family doctors have the highest vacancy rates among specialists and also constitute the highest proportion of specialists who migrate. There is inequitable distribution of doctors across the regions. Overall number of enrolments and graduates in family medicine are declining. Although salaries in PHC are higher than in hospitals, the overall health workforce salaries are lower than the national average. While there have been efforts to retain and attract doctors to PHC in rural and remote regions, challenges exist. The attraction of doctors to narrow specialties may be leading to undermining PHC and family medicine. While the optimal skill-mix and availability of nurses provide an opportunity to strengthen multi-disciplinary teams at the PHC level, shortages and unequal distribution of doctors are affecting health services coverage and health indicators.ConclusionsApplication of the HLMA framework has helped identify the bottlenecks in the health labour market flows and the possible explanations for them. The policy considerations emerging out of the HLMA have contributed to improving evidence-based planning for retention and recruitment of the PHC workforce, improvements in medical and nursing education, and higher investments in the PHC workforce and particularly in family doctors. Implementation of the Action Plan will require political commitment, financial resources, strong inter-sectoral collaboration, stakeholder management, and cross-country learning of best practices. Through this process, Tajikistan has shown the way forward in implementing the Central Roadmap for health and well-being in Central Asia and the Framework for Action on the Health and Care Workforce in the WHO European Region.

Spillover effects from a type 2 diabetes integrated model of care in 22,706 Australians: an open cohort stepped wedge trial

BackgroundMany Australian adults are not receiving timely or effective diabetes management to prevent or delay the onset of diabetes related complications. Integrated care, a worldwide trend in healthcare reform, aims to reduce the fragmented delivery of health services and improve outcomes. This study aimed to test whether a specialist-led integrated model of care provided to a small subset of patients in general practices leads to spillover clinical improvements in all patients of the practice with type 2 diabetes.MethodsSeventy-two general practice sites (clusters) in New South Wales, Australia received the Diabetes Alliance intervention, creating a non-randomised open cohort stepped wedge trial. The intervention comprised of case conferencing, delivered directly to a small proportion of adults with type 2 diabetes (n = 1,072) of the general practice sites; as well as practice feedback, education and training. Spillover clinical improvements were assessed on all adults with type 2 diabetes within the general practice sites (n = 22,706), using practice level data recorded in the MedicineInsight electronic database, compared before and after the intervention. Outcome measures included frequency of diabetes screening tests in line with the Annual Cycle of Care, and clinical results for weight, blood pressure, HbA1c, lipids, and kidney function.ResultsCompared to before Diabetes Alliance, the odds of all practice patients receiving screening tests at or above the recommended intervals were significantly higher for all recommended tests after Diabetes Alliance (odds ratio range 1.41–4.45, p < 0.0001). Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed for weight (absolute mean difference: -1.38 kg), blood pressure (systolic − 1.12 mmHg, diastolic − 1.18 mmHg), HbA1c (-0.03% at the mean), total cholesterol (-0.11 mmol/L), and triglycerides (-0.02 mmol/L) (p < 0.05). There were small but significant declines in kidney function.ConclusionsIntegrated care delivered to a small subset of patients with type 2 diabetes across a large geographic region has spillover benefits that improve the process measures and clinical outcomes for all practice patients with type 2 diabetes.Trial registrationACTRN12622001438741; 10th November 2022, retrospectively registered: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622001438741.aspx.

Experiences of central child health services teams regarding a special governmental investment in child health services

BackgroundHistorically marked by a high infant mortality rate, Sweden’s healthcare reforms have successively led to a robust, decentralized universal child health system covering over 97% of the population 0–5 years. However, inequities in health have become an increasing problem and the public health law explicitly states that health inequities should be reduced, resulting in various government initiatives. This study examines the experiences of Central Child Health Services (CCHS) teams during the implementation of the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement between the State and the regions starting in 2017. The agreement aimed to enhance child health service accessibility, especially in socio-economically disadvantaged areas, but broadly stated guidelines and the short-term nature of funding have raised questions about its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to understand the experiences of CCHC teams in implementing the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement, focusing on investment decisions, implementation efforts, as well as facilitators and barriers to using the funds effectively.MethodsCCHC teams were purposefully sampled and invited via email for interviews, with follow-ups for non-respondents. Conducted from January to October 2023, the interviews were held digitally and recorded with individuals familiar with the agreement’s implementation within these teams. Both authors analyzed the transcripts thematically, applying Braun and Clarke’s framework. Participants represented a cross-section of Sweden’s varied healthcare regions.ResultsThree main themes emerged from the thematic analysis: “Easy come, easy go,” highlighting funding uncertainties; “What are we supposed to do?” expressing dilemmas over project prioritization and partner collaboration; and “Building castles on sand,” focusing on the challenges of staff retention and foundational program stability. Respective subthemes addressed issues like fund allocation timing, strategic decision-making, and the practical difficulties of implementing extended home visiting programs, particularly in collaboration with social services.ConclusionsThis study uncovered the challenges faced in implementing the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement across different regions in Sweden. These obstacles underline the need for precise guidelines regarding the use of funds, stable financing for long-term project sustainability, and strong foundational support to ensure effective interprofessional collaboration and infrastructure development for equitable service delivery in child health services.

Leveraging publicly available data to evaluate health reform: establishing a methodology to assess the future impact of over-the-counter hearing aids

Health systems are complex and health reform is uncertain. With an aging global population, chronic health conditions are increasing and have become a priority for policymakers. Hearing loss is the third most common chronic condition among older adults and if left untreated, is associated with poor health and social outcomes. In the US, accessibility and affordability have been significant barriers to hearing aid utilization. Through new reform, over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids are now available. This study demonstrates how publicly available health data was used to establish a methodology to define, characterize, and analyze the target population of this reform. In this retrospective cross-sectional cohort analysis, data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was utilized, with a sample that included respondents from the 2021 NHIS Sample Adult Interview. Three hearing aid groups (Active, Potential, General) were defined using questions from the NHIS annual core questionnaire and a baseline population health framework was developed. Binary logistic regression confirmed that the framework sufficiently described two group comparisons (Active-Potential, Active General) and also identified the key determinants of hearing aid utilization. Classification and regression tree (CART) classification amply predicted active hearing aid users and verified the key determinants as important predictors. These findings aligned nicely with literature published before OTC hearing aids were made available, confirming the NHIS to be consistent and representative. Our methodology can be repeated to examine the impact of OTC hearing aids in the post-implementation period and similar approaches should be taken to examine other emerging health reforms.

Allyship with Psychiatric Patients for Health Care Practice Reform: A Case Study of a Narrative Approach Using Patient-Authored Medical Records.

Introduction: To facilitate partnerships between nurses and their patients with psychiatric illness, it is important to provide a safe narrative space for both parties where patients can voice their opinions. Purpose: A case study shows how the Patient-Authored Medical Record (PAMR) can contribute to health practice reform. Methods: A patient who visited an outpatient psychiatric clinic was asked to describe his life events. The researchers created the patient's PAMR, a first-person account of how he thought his illness could be cured, which was used when conducting follow-up meetings. The contents of the PAMR and that of subsequent meetings were used to evaluate the tool's usefulness. Results: The narrative content of the PAMR and the follow-up meetings reflected a reduction in the patient's symptoms and a change in his perception of his illness. Conclusions: Patient-authored medical records could be a step toward health-care reform. Allyships created with patients can form new cooperative two-way relationships that are more equal than authoritative one-way relationships.

Edwin Chadwick: A Pioneer of Public Health Reform and His Role in Sanitary Awakening.

Edwin Chadwick (1800-1890) was a central figure in the 19th-century public health reform movement in Britain. His work was instrumental in the sanitary awakening, a movement that revolutionized public health through the systematic improvement of urban sanitation and hygiene. As a lawyer by training, Chadwick was deeply influenced by Jeremy Bentham's welfare maximization theory, which emphasized the greatest good for the greatest number. His most significant contribution was his 1842 publication, "The Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population," in which he documented the deplorable conditions faced by the working class and the link between poor sanitation and disease. Chadwick's advocacy led to the passage of the Public Health Act of 1848, which established local health boards and marked the beginning of modern public health systems. His focus on clean water, efficient sewage systems, and waste management not only reduced the spread of diseases like cholera and typhoid but also set the stage for future public health initiatives globally. The sanitary awakening, largely driven by Chadwick's efforts, highlighted the critical connection between environment and health, a principle that continues to underpin public health practices today. Chadwick's legacy lives on in the ongoing efforts to improve urban living conditions and prevent disease through public health infrastructure.

A Critical Analysis of Medical Crimes: From the Perspective of the Penal Code of Afghanistan

Aim: This study explores the phenomenon of medical crimes within the context of the penal code of Afghanistan, focusing on how legal frameworks address illegal activities in the healthcare sector. Medical crimes, such as revealing medical secrets, using expired medicine, refusing to offer treatment by medical personnel, negligence, carelessness, non-observance of medical regulations by medical personnel, and patient rights violations. These medical crimes pose significant risks to public health and patient safety and are punishable under the Penal Code. The Afghan penal code discusses these crimes in detail, specifically from Article 886 to Article 892. The importance of this study lies in removing ambiguities in the recognition of medical crimes and clarifying the position of the Afghan penal code regarding their classification and punishment. Methods: By examining legislative texts, judicial practices, and real-world case studies, the research highlights gaps and challenges in the current criminal justice system. This work employs the doctrinal research methodology along with descriptive, explanatory, and analytical research approaches. It is worth mentioning that this research study is entirely based on library sources. Most of the sources are textbooks, scholarly published and unpublished journal articles, law reports, and online websites related to the research area. Results: The findings underscore the need for enhanced legal reforms, improved judicial capacity, and greater accountability to ensure a safer and more equitable healthcare environment. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on healthcare and legal reform in Afghanistan, offering insights for policymakers, legal professionals, and healthcare practitioners aiming to strengthen the intersection of law and medicine.

The Role of Women in the Development Path of Kerala

Kerala, a state in southwestern India, has achieved remarkable social and economic development, surpassing many other Indian states. A significant contributor to this success is the empowered role of women in Kerala’s society. This paper examines the crucial contributions of women to Kerala’s development path, highlighting their impact on education, healthcare, economy, and social reform. With a high literacy rate and active participation in the workforce, women have driven positive change and played a vital role in shaping the state’s development trajectory. The paper explores the historical and cultural context that has enabled women’s empowerment in Kerala, discussing the influence of matrilineal traditions, education initiatives, and social movements. By analyzing the experiences and achievements of women in Kerala, this research demonstrates the transformative power of gender equality and women’s empowerment in achieving sustainable development and social progress.

Patient regional index: a new way to rank clinical specialties based on outpatient clinics big data

BackgroundMany existing healthcare ranking systems are notably intricate. The standards for peer review and evaluation often differ across specialties, leading to contradictory results among various ranking systems. There is a significant need for a comprehensible and consistent mode of specialty assessment.MethodsThis quantitative study aimed to assess the influence of clinical specialties on the regional distribution of patient origins based on 10,097,795 outpatient records of a large comprehensive hospital in South China. We proposed the patient regional index (PRI), a novel metric to quantify the regional influence of hospital specialties, using the principle of representative points of a statistical distribution. Additionally, a two-dimensional measure was constructed to gauge the significance of hospital specialties by integrating the PRI and outpatient volume.ResultsWe calculated the PRI for each of the 16 specialties of interest over eight consecutive years. The longitudinal changes in the PRI accurately captured the impact of the 2017 Chinese healthcare reforms and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic on hospital specialties. At last, the two-dimensional assessment model we devised effectively illustrates the distinct characteristics across hospital specialties.ConclusionWe propose a novel, straightforward, and interpretable index for quantifying the influence of hospital specialties. This index, built on outpatient data, requires only the patients’ origin, thereby facilitating its widespread adoption and comparison across specialties of varying backgrounds. This data-driven method offers a patient-centric view of specialty influence, diverging from the traditional reliance on expert opinions. As such, it serves as a valuable augmentation to existing ranking systems.

A new future for family medicine/general practice in Portugal

The ‘Blue Book’: a Future for Family Medicine in Portugal, edited in 1990 by the Portuguese Association of General Practice and Family Medicine, influenced the subsequent years and built the foundation for the Primary Healthcare Reform, initiated in 2005, but not fully implemented. In the current moment of low professional satisfaction, reviewing the principles that should guide family medicine in the future is important. The family doctor is the individual’s physician, who accompanies people's health throughout their life. Family doctors are specialists in primary healthcare and act according to the core values of family medicine as defined by the WONCA. Their actions form the basis of the health system and are associated with better health outcomes. Therefore, their actions must be centered on the person and the provision of differentiated care, reducing bureaucratic tasks and those with low health value. Physical spaces, equipment, and human resources should be adequately ensured, including the adjustment of the size of patients’ lists to ensure quality and dignified work by the Family Doctor, in every working setting. The Portuguese Association of General Practice and Family Medicine advocates for a performance-based remuneration model appropriate to the family doctor’s activity that compensates and prioritizes value-based healthcare, focusing their actions on the individual and reducing inefficiencies and duplications. This model is based on a new, simplified, and modern quality system grounded in the classic Structure – Process – Results framework but considering the dimensions of patient and professional satisfaction and adequately rewarding clinical work, teamwork, and citizen-centeredness. The present document is an adaptation and translation into English of the book 'A New Future for General and Family Medicine', edited by the Portuguese Association of General Practice and Family Medicine, in 2023.

Avoidable Hospitalizations in the Military Health System, Fiscal Years 2018-2019.

Ongoing health reforms in the Military Health System (MHS) are expected to shift locations of ambulatory care for up to 1.9 million beneficiaries. We sought to model the impact of this policy by determining potentially avoidable hospitalizations in the MHS based on different primary care settings. We used the MHS Data Repository to conduct a retrospective cross-sectional study of TRICARE Prime and Prime Plus beneficiaries aged 18 to 64 years during fiscal years 2018-2019. Crude and adjusted risk ratios for each Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality prevention quality indicator based on primary care setting were calcualated to determine the total probability of admission for any of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality prevention indicators. We identified a total of 260,690 hospital admissions by patients in the MHS with a designated primary care manager (PCM) from fiscal year 2018 to 2019. Of the total admissions, 11,067 (4.25%) were for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality prevention quality indicators, 3.63% by direct care PCM at a military treatment facility, and 0.61% by a civilian private sector PCM. Risk of admission was lower for private sector PCMs for urinary tract infection, hypertension, perforated appendix, and angina without the procedure. We did not observe a statistically significant adjusted odds ratio of admission in patients managed by private sector PCMs (1.04 adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 0.97-1.11). Our findings indicate no difference in the likelihood of avoidable hospitalizations for beneficiaries with a private sector PCM when looking at all conditions together. Patients with a private sector PCM are protected against hospitalization for several conditions. Our findings indicate no adverse impact on avoidable hospitalizations for beneficiaries transitioned to private sector care from direct care.

Social Welfare as “Legitimation”: National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and the Politics of Health Reform in South Korea, from 1977 to the Time of COVID-19

With the perceived “success” of its K-COVID approach, relying heavily on the use of contact tracing, South Korea has received extensive praise since 2020. In part, this perception also extends to health coverage (NHIS), for which the nation has provided universal coverage since the late 1980s. This article re-examines the politics of Korean health care, looking at the circumstances under which the coverage was first adopted. At the time, it was enormously controversial, and there was a great deal of debate about how the government might pay for the system. Its cost-cutting measures continue to influence care (e.g. multiple beds per room) in ways that influence recent disease outbreaks such as MERS (2015) and COVID (2020-present).

Equity and efficiency of health resource allocation in the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle of China.

This study aimed to evaluate the fairness and efficiency of health resource allocation (HRAE) in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle after the new healthcare reform. This study also aimed to identify existing problems, providing empirical evidence for the government to formulate regional health plans scientifically and reasonably. The fairness of health resource allocation was analyzed using the Gini coefficient, Theil index, and agglomeration degree from population and geographical area perspectives. The three-stage data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist productivity index were used to analyze HRAE from static and dynamic perspectives. The Gini coefficient for population allocation in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle was 0.066-0.283, and the Gini coefficient for geographical area allocation was 0.297-0.469. The contribution rate within a region was greater than that between regions, and health resources were mainly concentrated in economically developed core areas. The overall fairness of Chengdu Economic Circle was relatively better than that of Chongqing Economic Circle. Moreover, the adjusted mean technical efficiency was 0.806, indicating room for HRAE improvement in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle. Stochastic Frontier Analysis found that different environmental variables have varying degrees of impact on HRAE. The adjusted mean total factor productivity change (Tfpch) was 1.027, indicating an overall upward trend in HRAE since the new healthcare reform. However, scale efficiency change (Sech) (0.997) limited the improvement of Tfpch. The fairness of health resources allocated by population was better than that allocated by geographical area. The unfairness of health resources mainly stemmed from intra-regional differences, with considerable health resources concentrated in core areas. Over the past 13 years, HRAE has improved but exhibited spatial heterogeneity and Sech-hindered productivity improvement. The study recommends strengthening regional cooperation and sharing to promote the integrated and high-quality development of the health and well-being in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle.

EEA Presidential Address: The Past, Present and Future of Health Care Reform

EEA Presidential Address: The Past, Present and Future of Health Care Reform

Evaluating the impact of the 2010 Swedish choice reform in primary health care on avoidable hospitalization and socioeconomic inequities: an interrupted time series analysis using register data

BackgroundThe Swedish Primary Health Care (PHC) system has, like in other European countries, undergone a gradual transition towards marketization and privatization, most distinctly through a 2010 choice reform. The reform led to an overall but regionally heterogenous expansion of private PHC providers in Sweden, and with evidence also pointing to possible inequities in various aspects of PHC provision. Evidence on the reform’s impact on population-level primary health care performance and equity in performance remains scarce. The present study therefore aimed to examine whether the increase in private provision after the reform impacted on population-average rates of avoidable hospitalizations, as well as on corresponding socioeconomic inequities.MethodsThis register-based study used a multiple-group interrupted time-series design for the study period 2001–2017, with the study population (N = 51 million observations) randomly drawn from the total Swedish population aged 18–85 years. High, medium, and low implementing comparison groups were classified by tertiles of increase in private PHC providers after the reform. PHC performance was measured by avoidable hospitalizations, and socioeconomic position by education and income. Interrupted time series analysis based on individual-level data was used to estimate the reform impact on avoidable hospitalization risk, and on inequities through the Relative Index of Inequality (RII).ResultsAll three comparisons groups displayed decreasing risk of avoidable hospitalizations but increasing socioeconomic inequities across the study period. Compared to regions with little change in provision after the reform, regions with large increase in private provision saw a steeper decrease in avoidable hospitalizations after the reform (relative risk (95%): 1.6% (1.1; 2.1)), but at the same time steeper increase in inequities (by education: 2.0% (0.1%; 4.0); by income: 2.2% (-0.1; 4.3)).ConclusionsThe study suggests that the increase in private health care centers, enabled by the choice reform, contributed to a small improvement when it comes to overall PHC performance, but simultaneously to increased socioeconomic inequities in PHC performance. This duality in the impact of the Swedish reform also reflects the arguments in the European health policy debate on patient choice PHC models, with hopes of improved performance but fears of increased inequities.

Assessing the maturity of integration of health and social care in Finland – findings from a pilot study

PurposeIntegrated care is the leading approach to developing health and social care services in Finland. After the national health and social care reform, the importance of assessing integration has been emphasized. The aim of this study was to pilot the SCIROCCO tool, which assesses integration maturity, in Finland. The SCIROCCO tool was translated and adapted to the Finnish health and social care context. The feasibility and utility of this tool for assessing the maturity for integration across health and social care in Finland were evaluated using empirical pilot data collected among employees of selected well-being service counties. The study also provided baseline information on the maturity of integration after the national health and social care reform.Design/methodology/approachEmployees (n = 111) of different personnel groups in health and social care services in four well-being service counties assessed the maturity of integration using a web-based survey. A pilot study design was used.FindingsThe SCIROCCO tool was found to be useful for assessing the maturity of integration in health and social care within the well-being service counties. However, the tool requires further development to be fully adapted to the Finnish health and social care system and to assess integration across sectors. The results emphasize the need to understand the perspectives of different personnel groups on integration and to consider them in the development work.Originality/valueThis was the first study conducted in Finland that provided valuable insights into the assessment of integration across the health and social care sectors. This study establishes the foundation for future research and development in the field of integration assessment.