Health Insurance Disparities Research Articles

Association Between Insurance Status and Nonelderly Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Survivorship: A National Retrospective Analysis

Background: Penile squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with significant physical and psychological impacts. Socioeconomic factors influence prognosis in genitourinary cancers, making the investigation of insurance status critical for reducing cancer burden and promoting health equity. Materials and Methods: Men diagnosed with primary penile squamous cell carcinoma from 2007 to 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) national database. Participants were categorized based on insurance status: privately insured, Medicaid, and uninsured. Pearson’s chi-squared test assessed the distribution of observed frequencies between the patient demographics, socioeconomic status, tumor characteristics, and surgical variables across the insurance groups. Overall and cancer-specific survival was estimated using a multivariate Cox hazards proportional model analysis. Results: The multivariate Cox hazards proportional model showed that, compared to privately insured patients, Medicaid patients had an increased risk for overall death (hazard ratio [HR] = HR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.12–2.07). For cancer-specific mortality, Medicaid patients had an increased risk of death compared to privately insured patients (HR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.11–2.25). Conclusions: Medicaid does not mitigate the differences caused by health insurance status due to health insurance disparities for overall or cancer-specific mortality. Lower Medicaid reimbursements and out-of-pocket costs lead to a narrow network of physicians, hospitals, and treatment modalities that compromise health equity. Increasing awareness of health insurance disparities and improving access to care via a clinician–community–governmental partnership can potentially lead to improved predictive outcomes.

Education and socioeconomic status as predictors of refugee mental health: insights from a study of Jordan-based Syrian refugee sample.

The Syrian civil war is considered as the greatest humanitarian crisis in modern history, which has resulted in a major refugee crisis. A significant concern is the high prevalence of mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among Syrian refugees. While the focus of most refugee mental health research has been pre-migration trauma, post-migration challenges and stressors, which can also be significant determinants of mental health, are often ignored. The purpose of this study was to assess mental health of Syrian refugees as compared to local Jordanians, and to examine sociodemographic factors and perceived stressors that are associated with mental distress among participants. This was a cross sectional study conducted in northern region of Jordan among Syrian refugee and Jordanian adults. We used the validated Arabic version of Afghan Symptoms Checklist (ASC) to assess mental distress among participants. A total of 929 subjects (43% Syrian refugees, 56% females) participated in this study. Disparities in education, monthly income, and health insurance were significant between Syrian refugees and Jordanians, p < 0.001. The mean score in ASC was significantly higher among Syrian refugees, particularly among refugee females (mean ASC score ± standard deviation: Syrian refugee females: 58.22 ± 1.13; Syrian refugee males: 45.31 ± 1.28; Jordanian females: 51.06 ± 0.91; Jordanian males: 46.45 ± 1.08, p = 0.002). Multivariable linear regression showed that the estimated difference in the mean of ASC score between males and females is 7.42 (p < 0.001), and the estimated mean difference between Syrian refugees and Jordanians is 2.76 (p = 0.019). Interestingly, the estimated mean of ASC scores for individuals with high education level is decreased by 4.18 as compared to individuals with lower education level (high school or less), p < 0.001. Education level was highly predictable of mental distress of Syrian refugees, particularly female refugees. Enhancing higher educational opportunities is proposed for improving socioeconomic status of refugees which might serve as a buffering strategy for mental distress among this vulnerable population.

Health disparities in acute myeloid leukemia: A decade-long analysis of Afro-Caribbean patients in a safety net New York City hospital.

e18515 Background: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in the Afro-Caribbean population is associated with poor outcomes due to disparities in health insurance and access to healthcare resources, among other factors, when compared to survival data in the national SEER database. This study reviews clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of a cohort of 51 Afro-Caribbean patients who were diagnosed with AML and treated in the past 10 years in a urban safety net hospital in Brooklyn, New York. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients diagnosed and treated for AML at New York City Health and Hospitals/Kings County from 2012 to 2022. Electronic Health Data was reviewed for clinicopathologic data and treatment outcomes. Analysis was performed through descriptive statistics with specific focus on insurance status and survival outcomes. Results: Our AML patient cohort had a mean age of 66, with 84% of patients identifying as Afro-Caribbean, and 51% being female. In this cohort, the AML risk stratification distribution based on 2022 European LeukemiaNet Risk classification includes 21 (41%) patients in the adverse-risk group, 23 (45%) patients in the intermediate-risk group, and 7 (14%) patients in the favorable-risk group. Of the 36 patients with molecular analysis data, 9 (25%) harbored a mutation in FLT3-ITD. Healthcare disparities are evident in insurance coverage, as 58% of patients lacked medical insurance, 19% had Medicare/Medicaid, and 23% had private insurance. At the time of this retrospective chart review, 35% of patients lacked any follow-up information, including appointments or status updates regarding their condition, vital status, or engagement with healthcare, possibly due to missed appointments, transfers, mortality, or other reasons. Of the 27 patients who were deemed transplant eligible, three (11%) successfully completed allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Reasons for non-transplantation include lack of a compatible donor, inadequate social support, insurance-related challenges, or patient refusal. Patients who completed induction and consolidation treatment with documented follow-up had a 23% survival rate at the five-year mark, compared to 31.7% overall survival rate reported in SEER data from 2013 to 2019. Conclusions: Our study highlights persistent healthcare disparities in Afro-Caribbean AML patients leading to poor survival outcomes. Despite treatment advancements, challenges related to insurance coverage, social support, follow-up care, and access to restricted, advanced care remain. Addressing these disparities calls for targeted interventions to enhance access and support systems for this vulnerable population.

Ethnicity and health insurance disparities in rectal carcinoma.

e13732 Background: Ethnicity and insurance coverage affect healthcare delivery in rectal carcinoma (RC). RC pts (pts) with Medicaid or no insurance are more likely to present with distant stage RC compared to Medicare/private insurance pts, and have a worse prognosis even when stage is accounted for. To combat such issues, federal law requires that non-profit hospitals, which make up 58% of all community hospitals, to provide charity care, or financial assistance, to those eligible. As insurance status, ethnicity and race have been found to independently affect colon cancer care, we expect similar results for RC in our limited but diverse cohort. Methods: Trinitas Medical Center RWJBH is an urban, community hospital that predominantly treats a minority population and provides financial assistance to eligible underinsured pts. Due to this assistance, or Charity Care, we can provide access to cancer care for many who would not ordinarily have such means. With institutional IRB approval, we completed a retrospective chart review of 59 pts diagnosed with Stage I-IV RC from 2017-2023. We assessed ethnicity, insurance carriers and treatment choices. Results: We reviewed 59 pts with the following ethnic distribution: 22 Hispanic (H), 21 White (W), 11 Black (B) and 5 Asian (A) pts. The median age at diagnosis with RC was 57 in H, 64 in B, 71 in W and 71 in A pts. B pts were found to be diagnosed with more advanced disease: 36% at Stage III and 45% at Stage IV, with none diagnosed at Stage I or II. H pts had comparatively fewer distant stage diagnoses (23% at Stage III, 18% at Stage IV). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy to 20 of 59 pts treated at our center, 15 of whom subsequently received surgery. Four of five of these declined surgical intervention post neoadjuvant therapy. H pts had the following primary insurance carriers: 36% Medicaid, 36% Medicare, 27% Charity care. 62% of W pts had Medicare and 14% Medicaid. 27% had B pts had Medicare, 27% Medicaid and 9% had Charity care. 50% of the 59 pts had Charity care, with most pts in this group being H. Conclusions: Research suggests that immigrants utilize healthcare facilities less than U.S. citizens and programs like Charity care may be underutilized. In our RC cohort, 38 of 59 (64%) pts were racial minorities, of these 50% received Charity care. Most did not receive screening prior to a diagnosis of rectal cancer and many applied for Charity Care only after their diagnosis. Despite offering significant financial assistance to our pts, we suggest education to immigrants regarding insurance coverage, broader screening efforts and the ability to offer improved subspecialty care to RC pts. In particular, we look to target B and H who present at younger ages and are not Medicare eligible. We believe this will lead to earlier staging of RC, which should lead to improved survival for minority pts.

The Economic Impacts of COVID-19 on Autistic Children and Their Families.

We used data from the National Survey of Children's Health to (1) examine differences in economic hardship and safety net program use after the implementation of federal relief efforts, and (2) assess whether the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated autism-based disparities in hardship and program use. We examined five dimensions of economic hardship (poverty, food insecurity, medical hardship, medical costs, and foregone work) and four safety net programs (cash assistance, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), and free or reduced-cost meals). First, we calculated adjusted prevalence and odds ratios to compare pre-COVID (2018-2019) and during COVID (2021) outcomes by autism status. Next, we calculated the adjusted odds of each outcome among autistic children compared to those of children with and without other special healthcare needs at both time points. COVID-19 exacerbated autism-based disparities in food insecurity, SNAP, and public health insurance, but alleviated inequities in medical hardship, foregone work, and cash assistance. Autistic children did not experience declines in food insecurity or increases in SNAP like other children; medical hardship and foregone work decreased more for autistic children; and the magnitude of autism-based differences in public coverage significantly increased during the pandemic. Federal relief efforts likely improved economic outcomes of children; however, these effects varied according to type of hardship and by disability group. Efforts to promote economic well-being among autistic populations should be tailored to the financial challenges most salient to low-income autistic children, like food insecurity.

Disparities in Health Insurance and the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Sexuality, and Gender Identity

Abstract: Status characteristics including race, sexuality, and gender identity play a significant role in people's access to health and healthcare coverage. Despite documented disadvantages across these individual statuses (e.g., race), little research has investigated how the intersection of statuses affect health coverage. Drawing on an intersectional framework, this study uses data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to examine the association between health insurance and the intersections of race-ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity (n=206,338). This study offers three important contributions to the research literature. First, this study represents one of the first to examine the intersection of important social status characteristics and health insurance status. Second, this study examines three indicators of healthcare coverage including status (i.e., insured or not), type (i.e., public, private, employer-based, or none), and denial of coverage (i.e., insurance refused to pay for cancer treatment). Third, we investigate healthcare disparities using data representative of thirty-two states that more holistically assess people's healthcare status and allow for greater generalizability. Findings show that Hispanic straight cismen are the least likely group to have insurance. White trans adults appear to be more likely to have insurance than many other groups. Trans adults are more likely to have public insurance if they are ethnoracially marginalized. Straight Black women have high likelihoods of their insurance denying coverage. These findings highlight critical gaps in access to healthcare and myriad disadvantages in coverage. Efforts to improve population health would benefit from an intersectional lens that focuses on how multiple status characteristics shape people's access to healthcare across the life course.

Disparities in Health Insurance Among Middle Eastern and North African American Children in the US.

To estimate and compare the proportion of foreign-born Middle Eastern/North African (MENA) children without health insurance, public, or private insurance to foreign- and US-born White and US-born MENA children. Using 2000 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey data (N = 311 961 children) and 2015 to 2019 American Community Survey data (n = 1 892 255 children), we ran multivariable logistic regression to test the association between region of birth among non-Hispanic White children (independent variable) and health insurance coverage types (dependent variables). In the NHIS and ACS, foreign-born MENA children had higher odds of being uninsured (NHIS OR = 1.50, 95%CI = 1.10-2.05; ACS OR = 2.11, 95%CI = 1.88-2.37) compared to US-born White children. In the ACS, foreign-born MENA children had 2.11 times higher odds (95%CI = 1.83-2.45) of being uninsured compared to US-born MENA children. Our findings have implications for the health status of foreign-born MENA children, who are currently more likely to be uninsured. Strategies such as interventions to increase health insurance enrollment, updating enrollment forms to capture race, ethnicity, and nativity can aid in identifying and monitoring key disparities among MENA children.

Spatial mapping of colorectal cancer screening uptake and associated factors.

Over the past decades, it has been understood that the availability of screening tests has contributed to a steady decline in incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is also seen that there is a geographic disparity in the use of such tests across small areas. The aim of this study is to examine small-area level barrier factors that may impact CRC screening uptake and to delineate coldspot (low uptake of screening) counties in Florida. Data on the percentages of county-level CRC screening uptakes in 2016 and county-level barrier factors for screening were obtained from the Florida Department of Health, Division of Public Health Statistics & Performance Management. Bayesian spatial beta models were used to produce posterior probability of deceedance to identify coldspots for CRC screening rates. Unadjusted screening rates using sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy test ranged from 56.8 to 85%. Bayesian spatial beta models were fitted to the proportion data. At an ecological level, we found that an increasing rate of CRC screening uptake for either of the test types (colon/rectum exam, stool-based test) was strongly associated with a higher health insurance coverage, and lower percentage of population that speak English less than very well (immigration) at county level. Eleven coldspot counties out of 67 total were also identified. This study suggests that health insurance disparities in the use of CRC screening tests are an important factor that may need more attention for resource allocation and health policy targeting small areas with low uptake of screening.

Healthcare coverage, access, and affordability among adult immigrant cancer survivors in the United States.

6529 Background: Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among US immigrants; however, barriers to care remain understudied. This study assessed disparities in health insurance, health care access, and affordability among immigrant cancer survivors in the United States. Methods: Adult cancer survivors aged ≥18 years who participated in the 2019-2022 National Health Interview Survey were classified as 1) natives 2) foreign-born (FB) citizens or 3) noncitizens. Logistic regression tested for associations between nativity/citizenship and insurance, access (i.e., urgent care, emergency room [ER], hospital admissions), and affordability (assessed by social determinants of health [SDoH]: financial hardship, food insecurity, housing assistance). Separate models adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. Results: A total of 8,923 adults (90% natives, 7% FB citizens, 3% noncitizens) were included in the study. There were baseline differences in age &lt;65 (42% natives vs 61% FB citizens vs 76% noncitizens), female sex (57% vs 59% vs 73%), non-White race (15% vs 64% vs 77%), and Hispanic ethnicity (31% vs 62% vs 5%) between groups (all p&lt;0.05). More noncitizens had household incomes &lt;125% of the federal poverty line (12% vs 18% vs 35%). On adjusted analysis, noncitizens were 3x as likely as natives to be uninsured (2.99 [1.36-6.53]; p=0.006) and FB citizens were 2x as likely to have Medicaid (2.10 [1.35-2.35]; p=0.001). Financial hardship was 1.5x more common among FB citizens (1.50 [1.18-1.91]; p&lt;0.001) while receipt of housing assistance was &gt;2x more common among FB citizens (2.98 [1.82-4.88]; p&lt;0.001) and noncitizens (2.37 [1.08-5.22]; p=0.03). While more FB citizens (18%) and noncitizens (33%) were food insecure (vs. 11%), there were no associations with nativity/citizenship (Table). There were no significant differences in health care access across groups. Conclusions: In this nationwide analysis of adult cancer survivors, although there were no differences in health care access/utilization, immigrants and foreign-born citizens had higher rates of uninsurance and affordability concerns—suggestive of barriers to care. This may portend worse health outcomes in cancer survivorship. [Table: see text]

Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections?

Racial and ethnic identities, largely understood as social rather than biologic constructs, may impact risk for acquiring infectious diseases, including fungal infections. Risk factors may include genetic and immunologic differences such as aberrations in host immune response, host polymorphisms, and epigenomic factors stemming from environmental exposures and underlying social determinants of health. In addition, certain racial and ethnic groups may be predisposed to diseases that increase risk for fungal infections, as well as disparities in healthcare access and health insurance. In this review, we analyzed racial and ethnic identities as risk factors for acquiring fungal infections, as well as race and ethnicity as they relate to risk for severe disease from fungal infections. Risk factors for invasive mold infections such as aspergillosis largely appear related to environmental differences and underlying social determinants of health, although immunologic aberrations and genetic polymorphisms may contribute in some circumstances. Although black and African American individuals appear to be at high risk for superficial and invasive Candida infections and cryptococcosis, the reasons for this are unclear and may be related to underling social determinants of health, disparities in access to healthcare, and other socioeconomic disparities. Risk factors for all the endemic fungi are likely largely related to underlying social determinants of health, socioeconomic, and health disparities, although immunologic mechanisms likely play a role as well, particularly in disseminated coccidioidomycosis.

Unsupported Economic Heroes: Illustrating Disparities in Health Insurance and Retirement Plan Coverage Among American Entrepreneurs Ages 50 to 64

Unsupported Economic Heroes: Illustrating Disparities in Health Insurance and Retirement Plan Coverage Among American Entrepreneurs Ages 50 to 64

Racial disparities in health insurance, triple-negative breast cancer diagnosis, tumor stage, treatment and survival in a large nationwide SEER cohort in the United States.

It remains unclear whether there are racial disparities in mortality between women of different races who have the same subtype of breast cancer when tumor stage and size and treatment are controlled for. The present study aimed to investigate whether racial disparities in mortality existed between women of different races who had the same subtype of breast cancer when health insurance, tumor stage and size and treatment were controlled for in a large cohort of women with breast cancer in the United States. This study identified 399,564 women who were diagnosed with incident breast cancer at age ≥20 years between 2010 and 2016 in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries, including 277,319 non-Hispanic white (white), 44,149 non-Hispanic black (black), 34,141 non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander (Asian) and 43,955 Hispanic women. White and Asian women exhibited a lower proportion of triple-negative breast cancer (9.8 and 9.1% respectively) than black (20.8%) and Hispanic women (12.6%). Black women had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with white women in only those with triple-negative breast cancer (hazard ratio: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.29-1.51) and those with hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (1.53, 1.48-1.58) after adjusting for confounders. In those with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, regardless of HER2 receptor status, the risk of all-cause mortality was not statistically different between black and white women, while the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher in all subtypes of breast cancer among black women. There were racial disparities in the presentation of triple-negative breast cancer and in all-cause and breast cancer specific mortality following stratification by triple-negative status and adjusting for tumor stage, size, grade and treatment.

Disparities in Social and Economic Determinants of Health by Sexual Identity, Gender, and Age: Results from the 2015-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

Purpose: We characterize disparities between lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults and heterosexual adults across multiple health determinants in a nationally representative sample. Methods: Data on 153,939 adults (including 11,133 LGB adults) were from the 2015-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Separate Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) that gay/lesbian and bisexual adults, respectively, experienced each health determinant, relative to heterosexual adults of the same gender and age group (ages 18-25, 26-34, 35-49, and 50-64). Statistically significant RR estimates were interpreted as a disparity. Results: Bisexual females exhibited disparities on all economic/health care access factors (no college degree, household poverty, means-tested assistance, unemployment, and lacking health insurance) across nearly all age groups; lesbian/gay females exhibited disparities in means-tested assistance and health insurance for some age groups. Notably fewer economic disparities were observed among gay and bisexual males. LGB adults (across identity, gender, and age group) were more likely to live alone, to have never been married, and to report low religious service attendance. Bisexual and lesbian/gay females, across age groups, had 1.7-2.2 times the risk of a lifetime arrest for a criminal offense, relative to same-age heterosexual females. Conclusions: Our results highlight that LGB females, particularly bisexual females, experience significant disparities in economic determinants of health, and all LGB subgroups exhibited disparities in some of the examined social determinants of health. The observed disparities, which spanned across age groups, likely contribute to disparities in physical and mental health observed among LGB adults.

Opposition to the Affordable Care Act has Little to do with Health Care

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has vastly reduced racial health insurance disparities, but efforts continue to repeal this health care law. It is not clear, however, whether this policy is rejected because of its health care provisions, or if the ACA is interpreted primarily as a social welfare policy aimed at providing resources specifically to non-white Americans. In this paper, we assess whether the racial divide in opposition to the Affordable Care Act is unique to this law or represents a reflection of a longer history of racialized social welfare policies in the U.S. The for this research come from the American National Election Studies (ANES) 2016 Time Series Study which targets United States-based citizens aged 18 and older. We conducted logistic regression to understand how racial attitudes and support for social policies relate to opposition to the ACA. Perceptions of the ACA, especially among white Americans, were related to both support for affirmative action in hiring and education and racial resentment more generally. Attitudes toward the ACA were unrelated to support for policies that have not been explicitly framed as benefitting non-white Americans. As public debates related to whether to amend the ACA or repeal and replace it altogether continue, scholars and public health practitioners should emphasize the role that racism and racial resentment more specifically play in health policy debates.

Government health expenditure, out-of-pocket payment and social inequality: A cross-national analysis of China and OECD countries.

This study aims to assess the association between Chinese out-of-pocket payments and government health spending, investigating their variation ratio in the context of OECD countries. Aggregated time-series data of 37 countries (from China and official OECD members) were collected from the World Bank Open Data source and analyzed using the multiple linear regression models. Benchmarking approach was applied to evaluate the causes of healthcare expenditure rise per capita. The results showed that China's government health expenditure was positively associated with out-of-pocket payment rise, with a higher variation score of 42.70%. The association was statistically significant at 5%. Likewise, the association between government expenditure and out-of-pocket payment in the OECD countries was positively significant at 1%, and their variation score was 2.41%. Health financing in OECD countries showed higher stability and equity than that in China. Policy implications for China is to reduce the distributional disparity of government health funds by tax adjustments in health services, universal health coverage, the removal of social health insurance disparities, and a single health payment method.

Association of maternal characteristics with latino youth health insurance disparities in the United States: a generalized structural equation modeling approach

BackgroundDisparities in access to care persist for Latino youth born in the United States (US). The association of maternal characteristics, such as maternal citizenship status and insurance coverage, on youth health insurance coverage is unclear and is important to examine given the recent sociopolitical shifts occurring in the US.MethodsWe analyzed pooled cross-sectional data from the 2010–2018 National Health Interview Survey to examine the association of Latina maternal citizenship status on maternal insurance coverage status and youth uninsurance among US-born Latino youth. Our study sample consisted of 15,912 US-born Latino youth (ages < 18) with linked mothers. Our outcome measures were maternal insurance coverage type and youth uninsurance and primary predictor was maternal citizenship status. Generalized structural equation modeling was used to examine the relationships between maternal characteristics (maternal citizenship, maternal insurance coverage status) and youth uninsurance.ResultsOverall, 7% of US-born Latino youth were uninsured. Just 6% of youth with US-born mothers were uninsured compared to almost 10% of those with noncitizen mothers. Over 18% of youth with uninsured mothers were uninsured compared to 2.2% among youth with mothers who had private insurance coverage. Compared to both US-born and naturalized citizen Latina mothers, noncitizen Latina mothers had 4.75 times the odds of reporting being uninsured. Once adjusted for predisposing, enabling, and need factors, maternal uninsurance was strongly associated with youth uninsurance and maternal citizenship was weakly associated with youth uninsurance among US-born Latino youth.ConclusionMaternal citizenship was associated with both maternal uninsurance and youth uninsurance among US-born Latino youth. Federal- and state-level health policymaking should apply a two-generational approach to ensure that mothers of children are offered affordable health insurance coverage, regardless of their citizenship status, thus reducing uninsurance among US-born Latino youth.

Racial and health insurance disparities in pediatric acute kidney injury in the USA.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) significantly increases morbidity and mortality for hospitalized children, yet sociodemographic risk factors for pediatric AKI are poorly described. We examined sociodemographic differences in pediatric AKI amongst a national cohort of hospitalized children. Secondary analysis of the most recent (2012) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Study sample weights were used to obtain national estimates of AKI (defined by administrative data). KID is a nationally representative sample of pediatric discharges throughout the USA. Linear risk regression models were used to assess the relationship between our primary exposures (race/ethnicity, health insurance, household urbanization, gender, and age) and the diagnosis of AKI, adjusting for comorbidities. A total of 1,699,841 hospitalizations met our study criteria. In 2012, AKI occurred in approximately 12.3/1000 pediatric hospitalizations, which translates to almost 30,000 children nationally. Asian/Pacific Islander, African-American, and Hispanic children were at slightly increased risk for AKI compared to Caucasian children (adjusted risk difference (RD) 4.5 per 1000 hospitalizations, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-6.0; 2.5/1000 hospitalizations, 95% CI 1.7-3.3; and 1.7/1000 hospitalizations, 95% CI 0.9-2.5, respectively). Uninsured children were more likely to suffer AKI compared to children with any health insurance (e.g., no insurance versus Medicaid: adjusted RD 14.4/1000 hospitalizations, 95% CI 12.7-16.2). Based on these national estimates, one episode of AKI might be prevented if 70 (95% CI 62-79) hospitalized children without insurance were provided with Medicaid. Pediatric AKI occurs more frequently in racial minority and uninsured children, factors linked to lower socioeconomic status.

Racial and health insurance disparities in pediatric acute kidney injury in the USA

Racial and health insurance disparities in pediatric acute kidney injury in the USA

Treatment Interventions for Women With Alcohol Use Disorder.

Women with alcohol use disorder (AUD) experience more barriers to AUD treatment and are less likely to access treatment than men with AUD. A literature review identified several barriers to women seeking help: low perception of a need for treatment; guilt and shame; co-occurring disorders; employment, economic, and health insurance disparities; childcare responsibilities; and fear of child protective services. Women entering treatment present with more severe AUD and more complex psychological, social, and service needs than men. Treatment program elements that may reduce barriers to AUD treatment include provision of childcare, prenatal care, treatment for co-occurring psychological problems, and supplemental social services. Research has suggested that outcomes for women are best when treatment is provided in women-only programs that include female-specific content. To date, research on treatments tailored to the individual needs of women is limited, but research on mechanisms of change has suggested the importance of targeting anxiety and depression, affiliative statements in treatment, abstinence self-efficacy, coping skills, autonomy, and social support for abstinence. Future research should focus on early interventions, linkages between primary care or mental health clinics and AUD treatment settings, and integrated treatments for co-occurring AUD and other disorders. Further research should also explore novel treatment delivery approaches such as digital platforms and peer support groups.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Insurance and Differences in Visit Type for a Population of Patients with Diabetes after Medicaid Expansion.

This quasi-experimental study evaluated racial/ethnic disparities in health insurance and differences in visits post-versus pre-Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion. We utilized electronic health record data from a population of patients with diabetes aged 19-64 seen in community health centers (CHCs). We used generalized estimating equation Poisson models to estimate incidence rates of insurance type and visits post-(1/1/2014-12/31/2015) versus pre-(1/1/13-12/31/13) ACA, stratified by racial/ethnic group. We assessed difference-in-differences (DD) and difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD). The relative disparity in uninsured visits increased between Hispanic and non-Hispanic Whites in expansion states (DD=1.93; 95% CI=1.41, 2.64); the magnitude was greater in expansion compared with non-expansion states (DDD=1.84, 95% CI=1.32, 2.56), yet uninsured rates were lower in expansion compared with non-expansion states. We found few changes in visits. Results suggest that the ACA Medicaid expansion increased health insurance coverage and that while some racial/ethnic disparities were improved, some remained.