Ethnicity and health insurance disparities in rectal carcinoma.

Abstract

e13732 Background: Ethnicity and insurance coverage affect healthcare delivery in rectal carcinoma (RC). RC pts (pts) with Medicaid or no insurance are more likely to present with distant stage RC compared to Medicare/private insurance pts, and have a worse prognosis even when stage is accounted for. To combat such issues, federal law requires that non-profit hospitals, which make up 58% of all community hospitals, to provide charity care, or financial assistance, to those eligible. As insurance status, ethnicity and race have been found to independently affect colon cancer care, we expect similar results for RC in our limited but diverse cohort. Methods: Trinitas Medical Center RWJBH is an urban, community hospital that predominantly treats a minority population and provides financial assistance to eligible underinsured pts. Due to this assistance, or Charity Care, we can provide access to cancer care for many who would not ordinarily have such means. With institutional IRB approval, we completed a retrospective chart review of 59 pts diagnosed with Stage I-IV RC from 2017-2023. We assessed ethnicity, insurance carriers and treatment choices. Results: We reviewed 59 pts with the following ethnic distribution: 22 Hispanic (H), 21 White (W), 11 Black (B) and 5 Asian (A) pts. The median age at diagnosis with RC was 57 in H, 64 in B, 71 in W and 71 in A pts. B pts were found to be diagnosed with more advanced disease: 36% at Stage III and 45% at Stage IV, with none diagnosed at Stage I or II. H pts had comparatively fewer distant stage diagnoses (23% at Stage III, 18% at Stage IV). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy to 20 of 59 pts treated at our center, 15 of whom subsequently received surgery. Four of five of these declined surgical intervention post neoadjuvant therapy. H pts had the following primary insurance carriers: 36% Medicaid, 36% Medicare, 27% Charity care. 62% of W pts had Medicare and 14% Medicaid. 27% had B pts had Medicare, 27% Medicaid and 9% had Charity care. 50% of the 59 pts had Charity care, with most pts in this group being H. Conclusions: Research suggests that immigrants utilize healthcare facilities less than U.S. citizens and programs like Charity care may be underutilized. In our RC cohort, 38 of 59 (64%) pts were racial minorities, of these 50% received Charity care. Most did not receive screening prior to a diagnosis of rectal cancer and many applied for Charity Care only after their diagnosis. Despite offering significant financial assistance to our pts, we suggest education to immigrants regarding insurance coverage, broader screening efforts and the ability to offer improved subspecialty care to RC pts. In particular, we look to target B and H who present at younger ages and are not Medicare eligible. We believe this will lead to earlier staging of RC, which should lead to improved survival for minority pts.