Health Inequalities Research Articles

Exploring the impact of obesity and community health programs on enhancing endometrial cancer detection among low-income and native American women through a public health lens

This review examines the intricate relationship between obesity, endometrial cancer detection, and the role of community health programs, with a particular focus on low-income and Native American populations. Obesity is identified as a significant modifiable risk factor for endometrial cancer, disproportionately affecting vulnerable communities, which exacerbates existing health disparities. The paper explores the epidemiological link between obesity and endometrial cancer, highlighting disparities in detection and the compounded risks faced by underserved populations. It also reviews the effectiveness of public health initiatives aimed at improving cancer screening rates and obesity prevention among these groups. Despite the progress made through various community health programs, substantial gaps remain, particularly in ensuring culturally competent, accessible, and sustainable care. A lack of longitudinal studies evaluating the long-term impact of these programs on cancer detection and obesity management underscores the need for more robust research. Additionally, social, psychological, and systemic barriers continue to hinder screening uptake, further perpetuating health inequities. This review concludes by emphasizing the need for integrated public health approaches that combine obesity prevention with cancer screening, as well as policy reforms to enhance healthcare access and provider availability in underserved communities. Recommendations are provided for future research that addresses these gaps, with the goal of improving early detection and overall health outcomes for low-income and Native American women.

Understanding the barriers and enablers to participation in vaccine trials in a pregnant population from diverse ethnic background in an inner-city UK hospital.

Vaccination during pregnancy is an important healthcare intervention for safeguarding the health of the mother and their infants. Ethnic disparities in recruitment to vaccine research studies during pregnancy potentially contribute to health inequalities. The aim of the current study was to explore the barriers and enablers influencing the willingness of pregnant women from ethnic minority backgrounds to participate in vaccine research studies. Semi-structured qualitative online interviews were conducted with 23 pregnant women from diverse ethnic backgrounds in the UK. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. Our findings suggest that participants perceived vaccines and vaccine research, in principle, to be beneficial to the individual and to society, and understood the value of vaccination in mitigating severity of disease and protecting the health of mothers and their infants. Apprehension over the safety of vaccination in pregnancy was common and reduced willingness to participate. For those that decided to participate in vaccine trials in pregnancy, this was seen as an act of solidarity, a way to contribute to a collective responsibility for the public health of the community. Personal and community connections and representation-seeing people from their own communities represented in in the recruitment process shapped decisions about vaccine trial participating. Trust and mistrust in health systems, shaped by past experiences of interacting with healthcare professionals were likely to inform whether they would consider participating. Practical considerations such as excessive time commitments related to study procedures, travel and organising childcare were barrier to participation. The level of invasiveness of trial procedures were also a concern, although increased monitoring during the trial was seen as a potential benefit, mitigating some safety concerns. Our study reinforcing previously identified barriers to vaccine participation among pregnant women from diverse ethnic communities. This study underlines the need to develop tailored interventions that focus on fostering trust with the aid of community engagement to understand cultural contexts, establishing authentic representation, and address practical considerations, to contribute to enhancing vaccine trial participation in pregnancy in those from diverse ethnic communities.

Understanding Community-Specific Health Behaviors to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes and Depression in Rural Adolescents: A Qualitative Study.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and depression co-occur, and rates are on the rise in adolescents, disproportionately affecting teenagers in rural communities and those who identify as members of historically disadvantaged racial/ethnic groups. Addressing the promotion of health behaviors is important for prevention of these comorbid health concerns; however, disparities in their prevalence highlight that a healthy lifestyle is not equally accessible for all individuals. Thus, holistic and multi-level approaches that address structural inequities, leverage cultural and family assets, and are effectively integrated into the community are critically needed. This project is an initial phase of a broader community-academic collaboration that aims to address preventable chronic diseases and mental health in adolescents living in the rural Mountain West by tailoring an evidence-based health behavior and lifestyle intervention for these communities. Interviewers conducted semi-structured interviews with N = 19 individuals (n = 11 adolescents, 11-17years, n = 8 mothers) who lived in neighboring counties in the rural Mountain Western USA and had a family history of T2D. Interview schedules were developed by an interdisciplinary team, with community input, and covered topics such as food and staying active, stress, T2D risk, and community and culture. Using thematic analysis, data were reduced through coding, categorization, and development of themes. Data revealed three major themes: "Families Face Systemic Barriers to Health," "Family Routines Support Health," and "Connection is Crucial to Holistic Health." Findings reveal opportunities for addressing health inequities and developing effective, integrated T2D and depression prevention strategies within this specific community. They also potentially contain insights that may be applicable to others interested in adapting interventions for diverse groups.

Health literacy and COVID-19 pandemic impacts among adults in rural northern Arizona.

Limited health literacy - the ability to access, process, and use health information and services - contributes to persistent health inequities. Yet little is known about associations of limited health literacy with impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for US adults in rural areas. This study sought to determine associations of limited health literacy with impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic among a diverse sample of adults in rural Northern Arizona. A cross-sectional, interviewer-administered survey was conducted with 119 adults from June 2020 to August 2021. Participants were recruited from two federally qualified health centers and by word of mouth. The Newest Vital Sign was used to measure health literacy, and the Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory was used to measure the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on various aspects of personal and family life (eg spent more time on screens and devices, had family celebrations canceled or restricted). Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable linear regression statistics were computed. Nineteen percent of participants had limited health literacy, and participants had an average of 22 individual impacts and 2 household impacts of the 92 COVID-19 impacts assessed. Multivariable regression model results showed that being male versus female or having public only versus any private insurance was significantly associated with fewer individual COVID-19 impacts on average. Being black, Indigenous, people of color versus White or being Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish versus not were each associated with significantly more individual COVID-19 impacts on average. Limited versus adequate health literacy was significantly associated with more household COVID-19 impacts on average. Sensitivity analysis results further showed that limited versus adequate health literacy was associated with significantly higher adjusted rates of household social, emotional, and infection COVID-19 impacts. This study's findings highlight the importance of assessing and accounting for health literacy in clinical practice and health services research addressing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and future emergency events.

Addressing health inequality and inequity for people with intellectual disabilities: a collective responsibility for all nurses

Purpose People with intellectual disabilities are high users of acute hospital care. Given their varied and often complex health-care needs, they often experience health inequalities and inequities, contributing to poorer health outcomes. As nurses are the largest health-care workforce with a patient-facing role, they have an important responsibility in meeting this populations health needs. The purpose of this paper is to explore key issues relating to the role nurses play in providing equitable health care for people with intellectual disabilities. Design/methodology/approach This service feature draws upon relevant literature to examine key contextual issues highlighting the importance of nurses in providing equitable health care for people with intellectual disabilities. Findings The findings from this service feature highlight the importance of nurses taking a leadership role in advocating for, and actively supporting the health needs of people with intellectual disabilities. Nurses’ leadership role, along with implementing reasonable adjustments, should be underpinned by education and training relating to the bespoke health needs of people with intellectual disabilities. This should help nurses promote the health and well-being of this population. Originality/value Addressing this populations health needs is a collective responsibility of all nurses. There are many examples of how nurses can be supported through policy, education, training and advocacy and this needs to be considered by key stakeholders and addressed as a matter of priority.

Emergency Physicians’ and Nurses’ Perspectives on Transgender, Intersexual, and Non-Binary Patients

Introduction: Providing appropriate healthcare for transgender, intersexual and non-binary (TIN) individuals remains a significant challenge, as this group experiences higher rates of health inequalities, discrimination, and barriers to accessing care. Emergency physicians (EP) often lack formal training and knowledge about caring for TIN patients, while comparatively less evidence is available for other healthcare professionals, including emergency nurses (EN). Therefore, our goal in this study was to explore the experiences, knowledge, and attitudes as well as education/training needs of both ENs and EPs in Germany regarding the care of TIN patients. Methods: In February 2023, we electronically surveyed EPs and ENs from emergency departments (ED) across Germany. The survey, developed through literature review and collaboration with experts and members of the TIN community, consisted of 15 closed-ended items divided into three sections: experiences and knowledge; attitudes; and education/training needs. We used standard descriptive statistics and tested for group differences using the chi-square test. Results: Of the approximately 1,665 EPs and ENs contacted, 502 completed the survey and were eligible for further analysis (30% response rate). Of the respondents, 233 (46%) were EPs and 269 (54%) were ENs, with ENs being significantly younger and with fewer years in practice. More than half reported experience caring for TIN patients (71% of ENs vs 61% of EPs; P = 0.002), but there were significant gaps in medical and non-medical knowledge. Attitudes toward TIN patients were generally positive, but differences in communication approaches were noted, with ENs significantly more likely than EPs to limit their communication with TIN patients to what was necessary (25% of ENs vs 17% of EPs; P = 0.006). Most respondents (55% of ENs and 58% of EPs) had no training in the management of TIN patients, with only 8% of EPs and 17% of ENs having received such training during their medical/nursing school education (P = 0.01). Both groups agreed that there is an urgent need to increase awareness of emergency medical care for TIN patients among ED staff. Conclusion: Both emergency physicians and nurses in Germany demonstrated deficits in knowledge of and clinical preparedness to care for patients in the ED who identify as transgender, intersexual and non-binary, indicating a clear need for enhanced education, training, and institutional support to improve emergency care for this vulnerable patient population. [West J Emerg Med. 2024;25(6)1–9.]

Discover the Factors of Longevity by Causal Discovery with PC Algorithm and Neural Networks

The study title has been to study the multilayered factors that govern a human prospect of living through the application of the PC Algorithm (Graph-Based Algorithm), logistic regression analysis, and the neural networks in combination. To realign the research purpose, a vast array of data can be used, which included socioeconomic status information alongside health and environmental aspects carefully chosen for their likely influence on how long people can live. This article will explain the longevity determinants by examining not only the conditions but also the environmental and health indicators and their combinatory effects. The PC algorithm can produce a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to see how elements like healthcare spending, education, and CO2 emissions are correlated with human longevity and how they influence each other. Moreover, the research takes other examples by analysis: researchers can examine hypothetical events. Neural networks were employed to depict the interrelationship among these variables which subsequently provided a user-appropriate understanding of their sudden joint influence. Consequently, a hypothesize was purposed that the potential interventions for the elongation of human life. Policy-making researchers can gain a better representation of the situation of health inequality and the new recommended solutions to tackle this problem and increase life expectancy by implementing complex analysis tools to blows away the criminal aspects of human longevity.

'It's designed for someone who is not me': A reflexive thematic analysis of the unmet healthcare support needs in UK autistic adults aged 65 years and over.

Autistic people often face both physical and mental health challenges throughout their lives, which can lead to a higher risk of premature death due to health inequalities. However, we know very little about the healthcare experiences of autistic older adults. In this study, we talked with 19 autistic adults aged 65 years or above living in the United Kingdom. We found these main themes: (1) A lifetime of being misunderstood; (2) Autistic people falling between the gaps; (3) Processing autism diagnosis in later life; (4) Concerns about service pressures and scarce resources; (5) Lack of continuity of care, empathy and understanding; (6) Anxiety, alexithymia and sensory overload; and (7) Reduced social support and concerns for the future. Themes show that autistic older adults face unique healthcare access challenges because services don't consider their lifelong experiences of social exclusion. Participants also worried about age-related decline coupled with reduced social support, which makes it harder for them to get support. To address these challenges, healthcare services should provide more targeted support, make policies and funding consistent, and improve healthcare provision by providing staff training. Importantly, they must also speak with autistic older adults so they can advocate for their current and future care.

Psychosocial factors mediate social inequalities in health-related quality of life among children and adolescents

BackgroundThe present analysis aimed to assess the mediating role of psychosocial and behavioural factors in socio-economic inequalities in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among children and adolescents.MethodsCross-sectional data was drawn from the randomly selected SEROCoV-KIDS cohort study in Geneva, Switzerland. Associations of socio-economic conditions (parents’ highest education, household financial situation) with HRQoL, psychosocial (parent–child relationship, school difficulties, friends, extracurricular activities) and behavioural factors (screen time, physical activity, green spaces time, sleep duration), along with associations of psychosocial and behavioural factors with HRQoL, were evaluated with generalized estimating equations. Counterfactual mediation analyses were conducted to test pathways linking socio-economic conditions to HRQoL.ResultsOf 965 children and 816 adolescents, those with disadvantaged financial circumstances were more likely to have a poor HRQoL (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]: 3.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.96–7.36 and aOR: 3.66; 95%CI: 2.06–6.52, respectively). Psychosocial characteristics mediated 25% (95%CI: 5–70%) and 40% (95%CI: 18–63%) of financial disparities in HRQoL among children and adolescents, respectively. Health behaviours were weakly patterned by socio-economic conditions and did not contribute to financial differences in HRQoL.ConclusionsThese findings provide empirical evidence for mechanisms explaining socio-economic disparities in child HRQoL and could inform interventions aimed to tackle health inequalities.

Recommendations to promote equity, diversity and inclusion in decentralized clinical trials.

Decentralized clinical trials involving the use of digital tools to facilitate remote research are gaining momentum. Rapid advancements in digital technologies have supported the adoption of these trials. These innovations facilitate virtual interactions between clinical trial teams and participants by making it easier to collect, transfer and store electronic data. While some studies have demonstrated the potential for these approaches to reduce barriers to clinical trial participation, they are associated with several challenges that may create or worsen existing health inequalities and limit the generalizability of trial results. Here we review the potential for digitally enabled and decentralized clinical trials to enhance clinical trial participation in an equitable manner. We describe the key barriers individuals from underserved groups may face, and provide recommendations to promote equity, diversity and inclusion.

Future patterns of health inequalities in the population of England to 2040: a microsimulation study

Abstract Introduction The existence of wide inequalities in health across England is well-documented. Our research adds to this evidence on inequalities in self-reported health by describing current patterns and projecting future patterns of inequality in diagnosed illness across multiple conditions by deprivation. Methods We used the IMPACTNCD microsimulation model that simulates a close-to-reality synthetic population of adults in England from 2019 to 2040. This model combines individual-level data on demographics, health and mortality from linked administrative data for primary and secondary care with survey responses on individual-level risk factors and epidemiological evidence on the associations between risk factors and chronic illness. This model can be adapted for other countries based on data availability. We used the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score (CMS) as our multimorbidity measure. This assigns a weight to 20 common long-term conditions based on individuals’ healthcare use and their likelihood of death. We further focus on “major illness” which corresponds to a CMS greater than 1.5. Results In preliminary results, we project that health inequalities are not projected to improve between 2019 and 2040. In 2019, the difference in the average time spent without major illness between the most and least deprived 10% of areas in England was 10.4 years. This is projected to remain largely unchanged at 10.7 years (8.8, 11.7). We also find that in 2019, the share of working age people living with major illness in the most deprived 10% of areas in England (14.6%) was more than double the rate seen in the least deprived 10% of areas (6.3%). In 2040, we project these rates to remain largely unchanged at 15.2% (13.0%, 17.6%) and 6.8% (5.4%, 9.1%) respectively. Discussion On current trends, health inequalities are projected to persist into the future. This has significant implications not just for population health but for labour supply and wider economic growth. Key messages • If current trends in risk factors continue into the future, existing wide inequalities in diagnosed illness in England are projected to persist onto 2040. • With significant disparities in major illness among the working-age population, this has implications not just for population health but for labour supply and wider economic growth.

11.D. Scientific session: Participatory approaches and co-creation in complex interventions to reduce inequity in health

Abstract Health disparities are linked to social inequalities, necessitating health researchers to address the health gaps that exist between different social groups, particularly in the realm of health interventions. This workshop delves into the significance of co-creation processes and participatory approaches in complex health interventions to reduce social inequities in health outcomes. Through empirical cases illustrating co-creation processes in intervention research, the workshop aims to enlighten the audience on the continuum of participatory approaches. The MRC/NIH framework of complex interventions highlights the importance of engagement with relevant stakeholders throughout the research phases to enhance the likelihood of developing or identifying interventions that can positively impact health outcomes. However, the extent and nature of stakeholder involvement may vary depending on the specific context and stage of the research. While stakeholder involvement has been a longstanding focus, the concept of co-creation, where stakeholders actively participate in the entire process of intervention development, implementation, and evaluation, has emerged more recently. This shift from creating interventions for the target population to collaborating with them in the intervention’s creation has led to the emergence of more inclusive health interventions that are contextually relevant and tailored to the local settings where they are intended to create change. Yet, introducing participatory approaches in intervention research may raise new questions about decision-making and power dynamics. While interventions led solely by experts and researchers may overlook the empowerment and capacity-building potential among stakeholders and intervention sites, co-creation processes have the capacity to empower stakeholders and address health inequities effectively. However, challenges persist in ensuring equal collaboration between researchers and participants, especially in disadvantaged groups. This workshop aims to prompt reflection on ethical issues arising from traditional health intervention approaches and approaches to ensure participants’ ownership of interventions when they are adapted in new contexts. Moreover, this workshop will discuss the design of participatory interventions: What methods can we use to co-create? What stakeholders to involve? At what stages of the intervention should co-creation occur? The workshop program begins with an introductory presentation of participatory approaches and co-creation in health intervention research, with examples from a school-based intervention. Next, three empirical cases of co-creation processes introduced in interventions in different contexts are presented. Finally, the audience is invited to a take part in a discussion focusing on how participatory approaches among disadvantaged populations can potentially contribute to reduced social inequity in health. Key messages • The involvement of stakeholders in the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions can take many forms, and what is meaningful for the specific context needs to be considered. • Co-creation approaches in health interventions empower participants and address unequal power dynamics between those who deliver and those who receive health interventions.

Data dashboards in health inequalities monitoring - A qualitative study of subnational policy-makers

Abstract Background Despite sustained improvements in life expectancy and health during past decades, substantial health inequalities persist. Subnational jurisdictions are increasingly recognised for their pivotal role in addressing health inequalities. While data dashboards offer a promising solution for monitoring health inequalities, their utilisation in supporting local policies to reduce inequalities remains largely unexplored. This study examines the utilisation of health equity data and data dashboards (i.e. Sotkanet, Sotekuva, Tietotarjotin and Hyvinvointivajemittaristo) for health policy-making in Finnish wellbeing services counties, identifies barriers in using existing dashboards and determines the data needs for improved health inequalities monitoring. Methods A qualitative case study design with reflexive thematic analysis will be used. The study will be pre-registered in the OSF framework. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with policy-makers involved in health policy development. Data analysis will involve open and axial coding to identify themes in participants’ responses. Themes will be organised into a coding framework, and the analysis will continue iteratively until data saturation is achieved. The study will include a pre-approved interview guide and peer debriefing sessions. Findings will be reported according to the Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines, with thematic diagrams illustrating key themes and sub-themes. The study is expected to reveal varying levels of utilisation of data and data dashboards among local policymakers, along with specific challenges and gaps in their current use. Policymakers may express needs for additional data or new features in dashboards to better monitor health inequalities. The study will conclude with recommendations for improvements in current data dashboards. Work is under development but by funders requirement the results will be ready by November 2024. Key messages • Data dashboards offer a promising solution for monitoring health inequalities, but their utilisation in supporting local policies to reduce inequalities remains largely unexplored. • This study examines the utilisation of data dashboards for health policy-making subnationally, identifies barriers for use and determines the data needs for improved health inequalities monitoring.

9.D. Practice session: Luton, a Marmot town – Lessons from using a whole-system approach to tackle health equity

Abstract Objective To share learnings from our Health Equity Town journey, including opportunities and challenges. To allow stimulating discussion on whole system approaches to health inequalities and the social determinants of health. To include discussion on where and how public health influences or leads, the importance of impact measures, and of shared vision. Added value Luton’s 2040 strategy, and being a health equity town, are long term visions. It has been 18 months since we launched Luton’s health equity ambition, and during that time we have taken great strides forward in how we deliver against the Marmot principles and create a movement around health equity in Luton. Organisations nationally and internationally are grappling with approaches to doing this. This workshop will provide an opportunity to discuss some of the key learnings, challenges and opportunities so far in taking this approach, and how to continue to maintain momentum and buy in across sectors at local level. The workshop will include discussion on the following: 1. Taking a whole-system approach to health inequalities - working across system leaders and strategic partners including health, care, voluntary sector, businesses, housing, police and others, as well as across the local authority departments. This takes clear articulation of the problem and actions, as well as clarity on where public health professionals are most effective to support, influence, and lead. 2. There is increasing recognition of the building blocks of health and the importance of ensuring action to improve health outcomes is taken across the whole system to tackle health inequalities - including employment, education, and housing. Discussion on specific actions being taken in some of these areas to tackle health inequalities as part of the health equity town approach. 3. Working with the community to understand health inequalities. 4. How we will measure progress. 5. The concept of proportionate universalism is now well known, however making this a reality is a challenge. 6. East London Foundation Trust, the mental health provider in Luton, is also embedding Marmot Policy objectives across the Trust, and is a key partner in Luton. Work is underway to establish projects with joint aims such as skills passport to increase employment in mental health service users. Format Presentation followed by opportunity for question and answer and discussion with panel. Key messages • Whole system approaches to tackling health equity are possible through shared vision and coordinated approach. • Action across the building blocks of health is vital, the complex and long term nature is challenging.

1.D. Scientific session: Cross national perspectives: the many faces of health inequities

Abstract Health inequities come in different forms in different countries, often times based on country and population demographics, and exist around the world. Ample evidence has revealed how inequities to accessing and utilizing health services can have detrimental consequences for certain populations and exist across numerous strata including geography, income, race and ethnicity, age, and gender. This workshop identifies different examples of inequities across countries, and their impact on health outcomes and health care use. Health inequities, in whichever form, lead to one common outcome: worse health outcomes and lower life expectancy for those who are marginalized by inequities compared to their counterparts. This session will dive into the research on health inequities by geography (rural versus non rural), income (low/average income versus high income), race/ethnicity, and among people with substance use disorder (SUD) particularly those who use and inject drugs with the goal of 1) exposing the stark disparities in health care among these populations; 2) discussing lessons which can be learned and adapted from other countries; and 3) discussing promising solutions and approaches to restoring justice and access to care for all. The panel will be composed of 1 moderator and up to 5 panelists. Panelists are experts in their fields, established researchers and practitioners, and either employees of the Commonwealth Fund or alumni of the Harkness Fellowship from various high-income countries including Canada, Germany, Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A moderator from the Commonwealth Fund will frame the discussion by introducing a deep dive into affordability barriers utilizing the Commonwealth’s Fund International Health Policy Survey of nine countries. Munira Gunja, senior researcher on the Commonwealth Fund’s International program, will present how a lack of affordability in health care is a growing threat and will likely widen the disparities by income without serious health reforms. Neil MacKinnon, Senior Harkness Fellow from Canada, will continue the discussion focusing on an analysis he and his team at Augusta University completed on disparities in health care by geography in eleven (primarily European) countries. The second panelist, Sidra Khan-Gokkaya, the 2023-2024 Harkness Fellow from Germany, will present on her study of racism in health care in Germany and the U.S. Another of the 2023-2024 Harkness Fellows, Claire Wilson, will present on her research of racial disparities in perinatal mental illness in the U.K. and U.S. Lastly, the fifth panelist, Ane Kristine Finbråten will discuss the unique health needs of those with SUD and the inequities faced by people who use and inject drugs as they navigate health care. Each panelist will speak for roughly 8 minutes, with 20 minutes saved for moderator and audience questions. Key messages • All stakeholders, including patients, public health systems, and health systems benefit when all populations are able to access comprehensive health services. • Health inequities come in many different forms, and to improve health outcomes, we must address them at all levels.

7.X.1. Providing BoD estimates on a regional level – necessity in assessing health inequalities

Abstract Burden of disease indicators, such as Disability-adjusted life years (DALY), Years lost due to disability (YLD) and Years lost due to death (YLL) have become standard indicators in public health reporting systems. Due to the combination of morbidity and mortality, the DALY provides valuable information on the burden due to specific diseases. These tools are employed by policymakers to devise intervention programs with the objective of enhancing the collective health of the population. Studies at the subnational level offer a greater added value to the public health information systems. Identifying variations in health outcomes and disease burden across different regions is a key factor when introducing targeted interventions and allocating resources. Health inequalities persist also in countries with good health systems and well-developed welfare state. There are notable contrasts in the political, economic and social environments across Europe. Moreover, the European countries are at different stages of the epidemiological transition, which encompasses a range of factors influencing health and modifiable risk behaviours. These differences are determined by socioeconomic inequalities at national and sub-national level, such as municipalities, counties and others. It is therefore imperative to provide BoD indicators at the most possible detailed regional-level and to link this information with further indicators such as deprivation indexes or Gini coefficients. Obtaining regional-level data for BoD analysis and health inequalities is not straightforward and can pose many challenges. Data availability is usually scarce and may involve significant resources in collecting it. Data quality and data completeness can also pose challenges in the reporting systems, which can result in under-reporting of certain diseases and overlooking health problems in the population. Also, countries with smaller populations are confronted with the challenge of a limited number of cases, which poses difficulties in obtaining regional estimates. The following workshop presents examples from European BoD studies, that have analysed health inequalities at regional level. The first presentation shows a country comparison study of the overall YLL and their association with socioeconomic and geographical inequalities. The second is from an Estonian study, representing a country with a small population that has developed its own methodology for assessing regional health issues. The third presentation from the German BoD study presents results on 96 spatial planning regions, which have been combined with the German index of socioeconomic deprivation. The final presentation brings example from Norway, where the association between YLL and education and income is examined at municipality level. Key messages • By comparing BoD estimates at the regional level, policymakers and public health officials can identify areas with higher disease burdens, indicating potential health inequalities. • Linking information on BoD indicators with data on regional and socioeconomic inequalities is essential when monitoring developments and tailoring strategies in public health outcomes.

The Welsh Health Equity Solutions Platform – a mechanism for health equity solutions

Abstract Health inequities are a longstanding issue in Wales, as they are across the globe. They disproportionately affect the health and wellbeing outcomes of disadvantaged groups, restricting opportunities to live full and prosperous lives. Post COVID-19 new groups are emerging with disproportionately higher risk of poor health and premature death and disease, especially those with unmet needs and vulnerabilities, with the rising cost of living amplifying health inequities. Despite their prevalence, health inequities are avoidable. Efforts to reduce health inequities require action on all the social determinants of health across the life course. Improved understanding of the key drivers of health gaps is needed to address the problem and provide support for solutions-driven action to break down the barriers to health equity. The Welsh Health Equity Solutions Platform (WHESP) launched on 22nd June 2023, a collaboration between Public Health Wales, Welsh Government and WHO European Office for Investment in Health and Development. The WHESP is an innovative digital tool developed around the WHO Health Equity Status Report initiative framework of the ‘five essential conditions’ for healthy, prosperous lives for all. It is a mechanism for health equity solutions and aims to inform and facilitate policy and decision making to improve population health and address the increasing health gap through an online gateway to data, health economics, policies, and innovative health equity tools. Emerging evidence is highlighted to identify solutions for achieving healthy equity, which informs evidence-based decision making to reduce the health gap, improve overall population health and wellbeing, and achieve inclusive and sustainable economic growth and prosperity for all. Collating and sharing health equity solutions, evidence, data and best practice both across Wales and globally supports equitable, long-term action to improve the health and wellbeing of the population. Key messages • Highlighting health equity solutions informs best practice on tackling health inequalities. • WHESP provides extensive evidence to facilitate cross-sectoral action and policy change.

Luton, a Marmot town – using a whole-system approach to tackle health equity

Abstract Issue Luton has high deprivation and health inequalities. We have a borough-wide vision that no one should live in poverty by 2040, and have become a health equity town - committed to Marmot policy objectives and recommendations across all we do. Description Luton is 70th most deprived local authority in England, with stark health inequalities. To deliver the 2040 ambition, 5 pillars have been established, including tackling health inequalities. Luton has become the first Marmot Town in the UK, working with the Institute of Health Equity to develop recommendations and actions relating to the Marmot Policy objectives. Cross-sector system partnership has been key -NHS, businesses, housing, voluntary sector, university. Year 1: we mapped the Marmot recommendations to existing workstreams; completed a mixed-methods evaluation to understand system views of the approach and establish our impact measures. We established steering groups: Children and young people; Housing; Employment and skills; Net zero, they continue to embed recommendations using logic models. We have an overarching strategic approach, alongside smaller scale programmes, to create a movement. Including: grant funding; regular newsletter; training; case studies repository and annual celebration event. Results We have established 15 impact measures across Marmot policy areas to review annually. Qualitative evaluation findings built into work plans include: improved governance and accountability; workforce development across the system; use of logic models; Learning from best practice; sharing knowledge and learning. Lessons The wider agenda of Luton 2040 has enabled health inequalities to be embedded into strategic discussions; improved evidence base and clear narrative to support priorities is helpful; clear focused recommendations helps move work forwards; shared understanding of how we will measure long term impact is vital, communicating to the system is key, and long-term ism challenging. Speakers/Panelists Lee Watson East of England Public Health Training Programme, Luton, UK Ramya Ravindrane East of England Public Health Training Programme, Luton, UK Chimeme Egbutah Luton Borough Council, Luton, UK Nasreen Ali University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK

Strengthening Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in medical education via an intersectional approach

Abstract Background In the wake of COVID-19, equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) policies have been taken up in the health field, yet the actual impact of these initiatives, particularly for multiply marginalized individuals, is debated. Despite progress in areas such as diversity promotion, EDI has been critiqued as superficial and as failing to challenge the drivers of health inequity. This presentation discusses how an intersectionality-informed approach can help harness the transformative potential of EDI. Methods This research is informed by a literature review of EDI initiatives in the health field, and is an offshoot of a 4.5 year international project funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research focused on evaluating and strengthening intersectionality-informed policy guidance. Results There is a disconnect between EDI commitments and substantive action on health inequities and an intersectional approach can help bridge this divide. We demonstrate this with a case example which brings an intersectional approach to EDI initiatives in medical education - including bias trainings, courses on the social determinants of health, and the engagement of community groups. Drawing on promising equity promoting work across these areas, we show how intersectionality can harness the potential of EDI by bringing to the fore what has often been missing, including the promotion of health stakeholder reflexivity, attention to interacting systems and structures shaping health, and meaningful engagement with underrepresented communities. Conclusions An intersectionality-informed approach to EDI has the potential to enhance the health equity impacts of initiatives within medical education and the broader health field. Key messages • EDI initiatives in health often have limited impact on health inequities. • An intersectionality-informed approach to EDI can help health stakeholders drive transformative action on health inequities.

‘Positive disruption’: catalysing system-wide work on health inequalities through embedded research

Abstract Background This presentation explores embedded research as an innovative model for bridging system-level knowledge to action gaps in public health. Embedded researchers (ERers) are university-employed researchers co-located in public health organisations, who work to boost capacity in these organisations to tackle inequalities by better use of evidence in decision-making, evaluation and service improvement Methods Drawing on the initial phase of the role and wider literature, we qualitatively reflect on strengths and limits of a system-level ERer model. Most ERer evidence draws on a one-to-one organisational model. This presentation explores a different model of an ERer embedded in and working across a public health system (health services, municipality, third sector) in a large city in north England Results Our focus is on catalytic features of the ERer role (1) positionality: being embedded at system-level gives fuller understanding of inter-organisational connections and of the implications of emergent system changes; (2) convening: bringing together partners improves mutual awareness and builds interest in collectively pursuing research aligned to identified population health needs and public health priorities in the city; (3) co-production to build capacity: working with a new cross-organisational partnership to collectively address issues constraining opportunities to pursue system-level research; working with the municipality to explore the production/use of research to inform decisions on approaches towards health inequalities. This includes work on links between public health and other functions focused on social determinants of health Conclusions This presentation outlines distinctive consequences of system-level embedded research in a city-wide public health system. It critically appraises the transferability of this model of knowledge production and mobilisation at the intersection of system and cross-organisational action on health inequalities. Key messages • System-level embedded research is an innovative model for helping to bridge system-level knowledge to action gaps in public health. • The model has catalytic benefits and transferability potential, although this needs to be considered in relation to the specific context for proposed system-level embedded research.