Health Gap Research Articles

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Subsequent Risks of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases: the Life Course Perspective and Implications of Racial Disparities.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common pregnancy complications worldwide and the prevalence is continuously rising globally. Importantly, GDM is not an isolated complication of pregnancy. Growing evidence suggests that individuals with GDM, compared to those without GDM, have an increased risk of subsequent type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Substantial racial and ethnic disparities exist in the risk of GDM. However, the role of race and ethnicity in the progression from GDM to T2D and CVD remains unclear. The purpose of the current review is to summarize recent research about GDM and its life-course impacts on cardiometabolic health, including 1) the peak time of developing T2D and CVD risks after GDM, 2) the racial and ethnic disparities in the risk cardiometabolic diseases after GDM, 3) the biological plausibility and underlying mechanisms, and 4) recommendations for screening and prevention of cardiometabolic diseases among individuals with GDM, collectively to provide an updated review to guide future research. Growing evidence has indicated that individuals with GDM had greater risks of T2D (7.4 to 9.6 times), hypertension (78% higher), and CDV events (74% higher) after GDM than their non-GDM counterparts. More recently, a few studies also suggested that GDM could slightly increase the risk of mortality. Available evidence suggests that key CVD risk factors such as blood pressure, plasma glucose, and lipids levels are all elevated as early as < 1year postpartum in individuals with GDM. The risk of T2D and hypertension is likely to reach a peak between 3-6years after the index pregnancy with GDM compared to normal glycemia pregnancy. Cumulative evidence also suggests that the risk of cardiometabolic diseases including T2D, hypertension, and CVD events after GDM varies by race and ethnicity. However, whether the risk is higher in certain racial and ethnic groups and whether the pattern may vary by the postpartum cardiometabolic outcome of interest remain unclear. The underlying mechanisms linking GDM and subsequent T2D and CVD are complex, often involving multiple pathways and their interactions, with the specific mechanisms varying by individuals of different racial and ethnic backgrounds. Diabetes and CVD risk screening among individuals with GDM should be initiated early during postpartum and continue, if possible, frequently. Unfortunately, adherence to postpartum glucose testing with either obstetrician or primary care providers remained poor among individuals with GDM. A life-course perspective may provide critical information to address clinical and public health gaps in postpartum screening and interventions for preventing T2D and CVD risks in individuals with GDM. Future research investigating the racial- and ethnic-specific risk of progression from GDM to cardiometabolic diseases and the role of multi-domain factors including lifestyle, biological, and socio-contextual factors are warranted to inform tailored and culture-appropriate interventions for high-risk subpopulations. Further, examining the barriers to postpartum glucose testing among individuals with GDM is crucial for the effective prevention of cardiometabolic diseases and for enhancing life-long health.

The Welsh Health Equity Solutions Platform – a mechanism for health equity solutions

Abstract Health inequities are a longstanding issue in Wales, as they are across the globe. They disproportionately affect the health and wellbeing outcomes of disadvantaged groups, restricting opportunities to live full and prosperous lives. Post COVID-19 new groups are emerging with disproportionately higher risk of poor health and premature death and disease, especially those with unmet needs and vulnerabilities, with the rising cost of living amplifying health inequities. Despite their prevalence, health inequities are avoidable. Efforts to reduce health inequities require action on all the social determinants of health across the life course. Improved understanding of the key drivers of health gaps is needed to address the problem and provide support for solutions-driven action to break down the barriers to health equity. The Welsh Health Equity Solutions Platform (WHESP) launched on 22nd June 2023, a collaboration between Public Health Wales, Welsh Government and WHO European Office for Investment in Health and Development. The WHESP is an innovative digital tool developed around the WHO Health Equity Status Report initiative framework of the ‘five essential conditions’ for healthy, prosperous lives for all. It is a mechanism for health equity solutions and aims to inform and facilitate policy and decision making to improve population health and address the increasing health gap through an online gateway to data, health economics, policies, and innovative health equity tools. Emerging evidence is highlighted to identify solutions for achieving healthy equity, which informs evidence-based decision making to reduce the health gap, improve overall population health and wellbeing, and achieve inclusive and sustainable economic growth and prosperity for all. Collating and sharing health equity solutions, evidence, data and best practice both across Wales and globally supports equitable, long-term action to improve the health and wellbeing of the population. Key messages • Highlighting health equity solutions informs best practice on tackling health inequalities. • WHESP provides extensive evidence to facilitate cross-sectoral action and policy change.

‘Positive disruption’: catalysing system-wide work on health inequalities through embedded research

Abstract Background This presentation explores embedded research as an innovative model for bridging system-level knowledge to action gaps in public health. Embedded researchers (ERers) are university-employed researchers co-located in public health organisations, who work to boost capacity in these organisations to tackle inequalities by better use of evidence in decision-making, evaluation and service improvement Methods Drawing on the initial phase of the role and wider literature, we qualitatively reflect on strengths and limits of a system-level ERer model. Most ERer evidence draws on a one-to-one organisational model. This presentation explores a different model of an ERer embedded in and working across a public health system (health services, municipality, third sector) in a large city in north England Results Our focus is on catalytic features of the ERer role (1) positionality: being embedded at system-level gives fuller understanding of inter-organisational connections and of the implications of emergent system changes; (2) convening: bringing together partners improves mutual awareness and builds interest in collectively pursuing research aligned to identified population health needs and public health priorities in the city; (3) co-production to build capacity: working with a new cross-organisational partnership to collectively address issues constraining opportunities to pursue system-level research; working with the municipality to explore the production/use of research to inform decisions on approaches towards health inequalities. This includes work on links between public health and other functions focused on social determinants of health Conclusions This presentation outlines distinctive consequences of system-level embedded research in a city-wide public health system. It critically appraises the transferability of this model of knowledge production and mobilisation at the intersection of system and cross-organisational action on health inequalities. Key messages • System-level embedded research is an innovative model for helping to bridge system-level knowledge to action gaps in public health. • The model has catalytic benefits and transferability potential, although this needs to be considered in relation to the specific context for proposed system-level embedded research.

9.N. Practice session: From Data to Action – Joining forces to close the inequity gap in adolescent health

Abstract Persistent adolescent health inequalities exist in Europe, necessitating interventions that address both individual and societal factors, especially those pertinent to youths in unfavourable contexts. Collaborative efforts involving cross-sectoral partnerships and adolescent engagement are crucial in identifying and mitigating these disparities. Three case studies exemplify this approach. Case study 1: Effective intervention development hinges upon the translation of epidemiological insights into tangible actions. Heiko Schmengler will discuss how individual and contextual-level data is made actionable for the development of ePro-schools, an e-health intervention to promote healthy dietary habits and physical activity amongst adolescents in socially disadvantaged settings. ePro-schools brings together stakeholders from academia, the health sector, the education system, and local communities. This collaborative approach ensures that the intervention is not only grounded in solid scientific evidence but also fits the specific cultural, social, and economic contexts of the adolescents it aims to serve. Case study 2: Adolescents are not passive consumers of interventions, but active agents who frequently understand best what they need to improve regarding their health. Lourdes Cantarero Arevalo will share innovative methodologies and best practices for involving adolescents in data collection, intervention design, and policy development processes with the final aim to empower the voices of adolescents in vulnerable situations while addressing problems that are relevant for them. Case study 3: Filipa Alves da Costa will draw attention to the health concerns of adolescents resulting from incarceration. This talk will outline the development of a policy brief derived from UN global study data, which highlights the importance of cross-sectoral collaboration in developing actions to safeguard access to high quality healthcare for adolescents within the criminal justice system. A cross-sectoral approach is critical given that criminal justice systems typically fall outside the direct oversight of health ministries. The goal is to encourage policymakers, practitioners, and advocates to consider inter-sectoral strategies to address the complex health challenges these adolescents face. Following the presentations, we will facilitate a dynamic discussion with the audience, encouraging an exchange of ideas on strategies to address adolescent health inequalities from a multilevel perspective. This discussion aims to draw on the collective expertise of participants from diverse backgrounds, including practitioners, researchers, and policymakers. This dialogue aims to identify common barriers and opportunities, fostering a collaborative approach to tackling inequalities. The goal is to emerge from the workshop with a richer understanding of effective strategies that can be leveraged to close the gap in adolescent health across Europe. Key messages • Health inequalities among adolescents must be tackled collaboratively across different sectors and with participation of adolescents. • Participants will gain valuable insights on innovative solutions and effective methodologies from the case studies to inform their own efforts in addressing adolescent health inequalities.

10.N. Scientific session: Gender and parenthood: short and long-term income, career, and health inequities

Abstract Despite the last decades’ changes in the distribution of household and child-rearing tasks, its main responsibility tends to fall on women. As such, parenting may remain an important determinant of gender inequalities in income, careers, and health and well-being. In 2022, on average, European women’s gross income was 12.7% below men’s. This income gap is, in part, explained by inequalities in full-time employment: in the EU, 31.5% of women with children worked part-time, which contrasts with 20.2% of women without children, with 4.9% of men with children, and 7.2% of men without children. These income and career impacts may occur due to the persistence of some traditional conceptions of the division of paid and nonpaid labor. These conceptions, and the subsequent inequalities in career progression and income, may be reflected in women’s living conditions, work-family conflict, chronic strain, well-being, and health. Yet, it can also be posited that men, experiencing the pressure to remain the main provider in the family and the most recent expectations to comply with childrearing roles, may also see their well-being and health affected. However, countries with higher gender equity have shown better results in life expectancy and healthy life expectancy for women and men. It can be argued that women and men, especially those who have children, benefit from countries with more progressive parental policies, such as longer and more equally divided parental leaves, accessible childcare, or flexible working schemes. It could, thus, be expected that these countries present higher gender equity in paid and nonpaid work division, career progression, and income, with a higher couple balance, and healthier family environments, with health gains for women and men who are parents and their children. This workshop aims to present and open to discussion recent research outcomes on the role of parenthood on income, career, and health inequalities across European countries. It will show results from quantitative and qualitative studies that focus on analyzing these impacts in the short- and long-term. By discussing these results, researchers and public health professionals may grasp parental, labor market, or social policies or health programs to foster gender equality in access to better living conditions and health, especially during and after parenthood. Key messages • Parenthood may widen gender inequities regarding income and career progression, contributing to the gender gap in health and well-being. • By understanding the magnitude of gender inequities and their distribution across countries, public health researchers and professionals may identify policies that effectively address the gender gap.

6.O. Scientific session: The unmet needs of LGBTQ+ persons and communities: perspectives from across the globe

Abstract Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer persons suffer from rising anti-LGBTQ+ stigma. Such stigma entails laws that punish being LGBTQ+ such as in Uganda, Russia, Ghana, Iran, etc. The stigmatizing contexts have numerous health-harming effects, including perpetrating mental health harms and creating environments that hamper access &amp; quality of services. Rising global anti-LGBTQ+ stigma and the adverse health impacts require more data on the topic to adequately dispel LGBTQ+ mis- and dis-information. This workshop will give examples of studies that examine LGBTQ+ disparities and inequities in health across different social and cultural contexts, drawing from research in Czechia, Kenya, Rwanda, and Sweden. The workshop will first outline the relevant social and cultural contexts of LGBTQ+ persons in various countries, such as attitudes, beliefs, and values. The workshop will then discuss LGBTQ+ inequities and disparities that arise from health-harming attitudes, beliefs, and values. Afterward, the workshop will discuss public health-oriented solutions &amp; policy directions, including using data for interpretation and advocacy labs and efforts, enhancing data collection, improving knowledge and attitudes, and other implications for public health practice and policy. The workshop will open a session that will situate LGBTQ+ public health for the audience. The first study will be by Andreas Malm from the Karolinska Institute, Sweden, examining LGBTQ+ differences in mental health and treatment disparities in Sweden. This will be followed by Luis Roxo from the Karolinska Institute and Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal, discussing stressors and symptoms that shape inequalities in mental health service use. Then, Michal Pitonák from the National Institute of Mental Health, Czechia, will present treatment and outcome gaps in the mental health of LGBTQ+ persons in Czechia. Lastly, Emmy Kageha Igonya from the African Population Health Research Center, Kenya, will showcase work from a mixed-methods study with LGBTQ+ people in Rwanda and Kenya, examining access to and use of healthcare services. After the individual presentations, which will each last 7-8 minutes, the audience will be invited to a moderated 20-25-minute open discussion on the papers &amp; how the findings can help inform public health practice &amp; policy to address the unmet needs of LGBTQ+ populations globally. The continuing rise in anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments across the globe is problematic from a public health standpoint, given the severe health-harming effects across numerous physical and mental health states and domains. Our workshop aims to facilitate a conversation on understanding the structural situations that shape LGBTQ+ health and identifying strategies to reduce gaps in services and needs that disproportionately burden LGBTQ+ persons. Key messages • LGBTQ+ people across the globe are experiencing rising stigma and discrimination. • Rising anti-LGBTQ+ backlash disproportionately harms LGBTQ+ physical and mental health and creates gaps in care.

9.L. Round table: “What” and “How” for building competencies for effective policy making in and for public health

Abstract Policymakers operating within the field of public health must regularly draw on their skills or competencies to facilitate engagement in and between policy sectors and with the public, to navigate the larger landscape of public health institutions and governance levels across the policy cycle, to generate, understand, and apply evidence for decision making, as well as to negotiate the demands of diverse stakeholders. What exactly are the competencies needed and how can they be cultivated to enhance the collective capacity of policymaking institutions? The increasing strain placed on public health systems worldwide, owing specially to challenges in population ageing, the burden of non-communicable diseases, and the exigencies introduced by pandemics, environmental disasters, and geo-political instabilities push us to expand the scope of public health. A look to the policy environs and outcomes seen within and across countries demonstrates that the quality of policy is both highly variable and exceedingly subject to the quality of public health leadership itself. These developments shed light on the need for greater investment in the development of competencies needed by policymakers to engage in effective decision making on key issues impacting population health and the resilience of public health systems. This includes efforts to strengthen the abilities of policymakers to identify problems, recognize opportunities, and put forth solutions in line with robust data and evidence, principles of public health ethics, gaps and priorities in public health needs, and in accordance with financial and political realities. The proposed roundtable will examine the state-of-the-art on policymaking competencies in public health, and how to build them by examining the barriers and opportunities. The panel will convene leading experts in the field of public health research and practice to explore: 1) the conceptual definition of competencies for policymaking at different levels of governance and across the policy cycle; 2) the strengths and limits of competency frameworks and their utility in guiding assessment and training tools, as well as policy practice; 3) the challenges associated with developing, maintaining and transferring competencies in fast-changing, multi-level policy making environments; 4) the challenges for public health experts and institutions to be trusted advisors both by policy makers and other stakeholders and the population; and 5) the opportunities to harness the unexploited power of professional networks in some countries of Europe. Key messages • An enhanced research agenda and investment are needed for the development of competencies - individual and collective - for effective public health policy-making and stronger governance. • Innovative approaches to policy-making are needed, and this requires building competencies, including leadership, for addressing the complex nature of public health.

6.G. Scientific session: The importance of using country-specific severity distributions in burden of disease indicators

Abstract One of the most commonly used health gap summary measures in the field of public health is the Disability-adjusted life year (DALY). It has become the key metric for quantifying the burden of disease (BoD) and is used as an information source for setting priorities for health care and health service planning. The DALY metric quantifies gaps between a theoretical population in perfect health and the current health status related to both morbidity and mortality. It is the sum of the number of healthy life years lost due to disability (YLD) and death (YLL). The YLD summarises the loss of healthy life time using the frequency of diseases differentiated by severities or related health states (including sequelae). Depending on each health state, it converts the time spent with diseases into YLD by weighting each year with health limitation with so-called disability weights. This allows the two indicators YLL and YLD to be added to the DALY. Consequently, severity distributions are a means of describing the range of health loss along specific health states, which enables an accurate mapping with disability weights. For most of the diseases, these distributions are usually categorised as mild, moderate, severe, or no health loss (asymptomatic). Conditions with higher severity levels contribute more to the YLD and thus, to the overall disease specific BoD. The severity distributions are highly dependent on utilization at the individual level, but also on available health care services at the society level, which indicates that differences by settings are to be expected. Changes over time in the share of severe cases, for instance, may reflect the effectiveness of health interventions and policies. This underlines the importance of severity distributions, as they also reflect information about the quality of healthcare for those affected. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study applies for a significant proportion of their considered diseases uniform severity distributions across countries and broader regions. They acknowledge concerns over applying estimates of severity distributions based on limited data, noting that it is the only available information that they were able to use. As the YLD estimates are often utilized to develop and prioritize health policy interventions, there is a necessity for country-specific estimates that are evidence based and less susceptible to model assumptions. In most cases, the estimation of severity distributions involves complex methodology as data for such assessments are very limited or hardly reliable. In the following workshop, general concepts and country cases from Germany, Scotland, and Belgium will be presented covering a variety of diseases. The examples underline the importance of estimating national and even regional severity distributions when identifying the importance of diseases or comparing the health conditions of populations across time. Key messages • As the Burden of disease indicators are predominantly used to prioritize health interventions and allocate resources, it is crucial to use accurate information in the severity levels of disease. • Severity distributions reflect the health care services and vary across different settings. Utilising country-specific severity distributions when estimating Burden of Disease indicators is essential.

11.D. Scientific session: Participatory approaches and co-creation in complex interventions to reduce inequity in health

Abstract Health disparities are linked to social inequalities, necessitating health researchers to address the health gaps that exist between different social groups, particularly in the realm of health interventions. This workshop delves into the significance of co-creation processes and participatory approaches in complex health interventions to reduce social inequities in health outcomes. Through empirical cases illustrating co-creation processes in intervention research, the workshop aims to enlighten the audience on the continuum of participatory approaches. The MRC/NIH framework of complex interventions highlights the importance of engagement with relevant stakeholders throughout the research phases to enhance the likelihood of developing or identifying interventions that can positively impact health outcomes. However, the extent and nature of stakeholder involvement may vary depending on the specific context and stage of the research. While stakeholder involvement has been a longstanding focus, the concept of co-creation, where stakeholders actively participate in the entire process of intervention development, implementation, and evaluation, has emerged more recently. This shift from creating interventions for the target population to collaborating with them in the intervention’s creation has led to the emergence of more inclusive health interventions that are contextually relevant and tailored to the local settings where they are intended to create change. Yet, introducing participatory approaches in intervention research may raise new questions about decision-making and power dynamics. While interventions led solely by experts and researchers may overlook the empowerment and capacity-building potential among stakeholders and intervention sites, co-creation processes have the capacity to empower stakeholders and address health inequities effectively. However, challenges persist in ensuring equal collaboration between researchers and participants, especially in disadvantaged groups. This workshop aims to prompt reflection on ethical issues arising from traditional health intervention approaches and approaches to ensure participants’ ownership of interventions when they are adapted in new contexts. Moreover, this workshop will discuss the design of participatory interventions: What methods can we use to co-create? What stakeholders to involve? At what stages of the intervention should co-creation occur? The workshop program begins with an introductory presentation of participatory approaches and co-creation in health intervention research, with examples from a school-based intervention. Next, three empirical cases of co-creation processes introduced in interventions in different contexts are presented. Finally, the audience is invited to a take part in a discussion focusing on how participatory approaches among disadvantaged populations can potentially contribute to reduced social inequity in health. Key messages • The involvement of stakeholders in the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions can take many forms, and what is meaningful for the specific context needs to be considered. • Co-creation approaches in health interventions empower participants and address unequal power dynamics between those who deliver and those who receive health interventions.

Assessing the adequacy and sustainability of the Northern Territory health workforce with respect to burden of disease and injury, 2009-2021: an analysis of administrative data.

To assess the adequacy of the Northern Territory health workforce with respect to population size and burden of disease, overall and by selected health specialties; to assess its sustainability by investigating changes in workforce numbers. Analysis of Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) health workforce data (2013-2021) and burden of disease data (disability-adjusted life-years, DALYs) drawn from national and NT burden of disease studies (and projected for 2019-2021). NT and Australian health workforces, 2009-2021. Adequacy of the NT health workforce, assessed as the ratio of the mean annual numbers of NT health workers per 1000 population or health workers per 1000 DALYs (2009-2013 and 2014-2018) to those of the Australian workforce (2013 and 2018); sustainability of the NT health workforce, defined as the number of health workers per 1000 population or per 1000 DALYs increasing between 2013 and 2021. The number of health workers per 1000 population was slightly higher in the NT than for Australia in both time periods (2009-2013 v 2013: 23.30 v 21.79 per 1000 population, 6.9% larger; 2014-2018 v 2018: 25.79 v 23.47 per 1000 population, 9.9% larger); however, it was smaller with respect to burden of disease (2009-2013 v 2013: 82.6 v 107.4 health workers per 1000 DALYs, 23.1% fewer; 2014-2018 v 2018: 91.5 v 117.1 per 1000 DALYs, 21.8% fewer). In particular, 464 more nurses and midwives (11.4% more than the mean for 2013-2021), 196 more physiotherapists (115%), 189 more psychologists (102%), 152 more pharmacists (79%), and 144 more dentists (106%) are needed in the NT to match the corresponding numbers of health workers by disease burden for Australia as a whole. The number of Aboriginal health practitioners per 100 000 DALYs fell during the study period. Health worker population density alone does not reliably assess health workforce needs; burden of disease information is important for workforce planning that meets population health needs. The NT health workforce needs to be increased by about 28% to reflect the population burden of disease and injury. Shortages in the NT health workforce must be eliminated to close health gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

26 Culturally informed developmental paediatric care: A qualitative study

Abstract Background Paediatricians provide developmental care through developmental surveillance, identification and management of specific developmental disorders, and health advocacy. Despite being one of the most common reasons to visit a paediatrician, the provision of care in this field is challenging as it intersects with medical, mental health, and educational systems. Additionally, the rise of international migration, inequities in health systems, and unique culturally based concepts of child development require paediatricians to have unique skills for culturally informed care provision in this area. Objectives A qualitative study was conducted to describe the perceptions of paediatricians on providing culturally informed developmental paediatric care to diverse populations. Design/Methods Semi-structured interviews were completed with paediatricians who primarily provide developmental care to understand the challenges, opportunities, and potential educational enhancements to improve culturally informed care for developmental paediatrics. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcribed interviews using inductive and deductive approaches. Results Three major themes emerged from 18 individual semi-structured interviews. The first theme, “cultural translation,” described language differences, interpretation, and trust-building between discordant physician/family dyads. The second theme, “inequity,” described systemic barriers that diverse populations experience, power distance in healthcare relationships, and pandemic-related amplifications of inequity. The third theme, “educational opportunities,” highlighted reflective practice opportunities, immersive experiences in diverse settings, and building a community of practice for paediatricians to build their knowledge base. Paediatricians practicing developmental paediatric care highlighted unique elements to the practice which may benefit from practice changes and curricular reform. Integration of meaningful training in the use of interpretation services, multicultural health brokers, and care coordination teams is a recommended intervention which is transferable to many disciplines. Peer-mentorship from colleagues of differing cultural backgrounds may help reduce race-based stereotypes and enhance perspective taking. Conclusion Paediatricians had a variety of perspectives on the provision of developmental paediatric care to diverse populations within Canada. There were a range of perceived opportunities for improvements in care noted on individual and systems levels. The development of infrastructure to build capacity in culturally informed developmental paediatric care to reduce culturally based health gaps is a needed future direction for developmental paediatrics.

Spatial and Ethno-national Health Inequalities: Health and Mortality Gaps between Palestinians and Jews in Israel.

This research adopts an analytical spatial perspective to explain ethno-national health inequality between Palestinians and Jews in Israel. The work identifies the forces that instigated and maintained the spatial segregation of Palestinians and elaborates the role of segregation in generating health gaps between Palestinians and Jews. The analysis suggests a novel conceptualization of two types of segregation: (a) exclusion from the center and confinement to the periphery and (b) segregation within the geographic periphery. Using administrative data on COVID-19 incidence, hospitalization, and death and various health indicators for localities, I devise a decomposition method that evaluates the relative contribution of each type of segregation to the total health gap. The findings indicate that the segregation of Palestinians from the center and their confinement to peripheral regions are crucial determinants of their poor health outcomes and that the segregation of the Palestinian community within the geographic periphery also contributes to poorer health.

Exploring Research Trends on Digital Health in Nursing Science in Korea: A Topic Modeling Approach.

Digital health technology is utilized in contemporary nursing practice and education. This review explored the scope of digital health applications and major trends in nursing research involving digital health in Korea using topic modeling. Our analysis of data using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model identified four distinct research topics: nursing education using digital technologies (35.17%), hospital-based nursing practice using digital technologies (19.88%), digital technologies for health education (25.75%), and development of digital technologies to support self-management of chronic conditions (19.20%). Our findings reveal trends, current issues, and gaps in digital health nursing research.

Sex, ethnicity and language differences in statin prescribing in community health center patients

BackgroundStatins have been shown to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In the United States, statins are underutilized, and the literature suggests women and Latine individuals received even fewer prescriptions than men even when eligible. No study has shown how statins are prescribed when looking at language, ethnicity, and considering sex. MethodsData were analyzed from a multistate EHR network across the US from 2014 to 2020. We included patients aged 40+ that were non-Hispanic White, English speaking Latine, and Spanish speaking Latine and further disaggregated by sex with the aim to examine statin prescription prevalence and rates between groups. GEE logistic and negative binomial regression models were used determine the outcomes adjusted by appropriate covariates. ResultsWe found compared to non-Hispanic White men, only Spanish speaking Latinos had higher odds of receiving a statin prescription, but once one statin was prescribed, non-Hispanic White women were the only group with higher rates. We found a higher percent of Spanish speaking Latine patients regardless of sex had a statin prescription. Prevalence of having a statin prescription was 59.3 % and 59.7 % for Spanish speaking Latinos and Latinas respectively compared to 55.5 % 57.0 % for non-Hispanic White men and women respectively. ConclusionsOverall, we found ethnicity, language, and sex differences. Clinicians in CHCs play an important role in the process to eliminate the sex gap in preventive health. The attention to statin prescribing in Spanish speaking Latine patients indicates more conscious care is being implemented in these vulnerable populations.

Public-engagement strategies of the South Asian COVID-19 Task Force: The role of racialized healthcare workers in COVID-19 mitigation in Ontario.

The COVID-19 pandemic began in late 2019 and its uneven impact across different communities globally was quickly evident. In Canada, South Asian communities were disproportionately affected. In response, the South Asian COVID-19 Task Force (SACTF) emerged, seeking to address the unique challenges faced by the South Asian community. The embedded single case study design was employed to explore the role of SACTF in COVID-19 mitigation in Ontario. Informed by critical race theory and a public engagement conceptual framework published by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (2010), we analyzed how contexts guided the goals, processes, and outcomes of SACTF activities. We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with SACTF's Board of Directors and analyzed SACTF-produced knowledge dissemination materials and media coverage of SACTF spanning March 2020 to February 2022. SACTF's success in educating and advocating for South Asians offers important insights into the gaps in public health communication and the inequities in healthcare delivery. It emphasizes the importance of tailoring emergency responses to community-specific needs and the role of racialized healthcare workers in facilitating trust-building within minority communities. By incorporating insights of racialized healthcare workers in health system decision-making, both public engagement and community health outcomes can be improved. This study contributes to a nuanced understanding of community-centric pandemic responses and demonstrates the need for diverse representation in decision-making processes for long-term health system resilience. Both healthcare knowledge and lived experiences made SACTF alert to how pandemics unfold differently and have differential effects on racialized populations. SACTF's responses offer practical recommendations for future pandemic preparedness and emergency responses, emphasizing the role of advocacy groups in addressing public health gaps and serving as crucial allies for communities and governments.

Caregiver burden and therapeutic needs in Dravet syndrome - a national UK cross-sectional questionnaire study

Background and objectivesDravet Syndrome is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with significant care needs for affected individuals and families. Our objective was to characterise the caregiver burden and therapeutic needs of families caring for an individual with Dravet Syndrome from child to adulthood, to examine age related differences in co-morbidities, and identify current gaps in health and social care. MethodsCross-sectional national survey conducted by the patient advocacy group Dravet Syndrome UK (DSUK) emailed to registered families caring for an individual with a confirmed diagnosis of Dravet syndrome. To characterise the sample, quantitative data on demographics, diagnostic journey, co-morbidities, therapies, healthcare utilisation, social care and funding, and impact on family life were collected. Qualitative data were analysed using grounded theory to develop a model of impact and service need. Results165 out of 381 families (43%) responded. 90% of adult Dravet syndrome patients waited >12 months to receive a diagnosis, compared to 25% families with a young child (p<0.001). 96% reported intellectual disability as co-morbidity, more frequently observed in older Dravet syndrome individuals (p<0.001), alongside autism/autistic-like symptoms (χ2=15.3, df=3 p=0.001) and scoliosis (χ2=28.4, df=3, p<0.001). Sleep problems are associated with greater impact on caregiver’s mental well-being (χ2=13.2, df=2, p<0.001). 77% of families wished more discussions about sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and 50% rated the paediatric to adult transition experience as ‘poor’. 90% of caregivers were unable to continue working as normal with negative impact on their quality of life (p=0.024) and mental well-being (p=0.007). DiscussionFamilies are profoundly impacted by Dravet syndrome. Their experience changes over time as people with Dravet syndrome become older and present with increasing levels of health, cognitive and behavioural comorbidities. Families will benefit from improved communication with health care professionals, psychosocial interventions and better access to social care.

Projected health workforce requirements and shortage for addressing the disease burden in the WHO Africa Region, 2022–2030: a needs-based modelling study

IntroductionAn adequate health workforce (HWF) is essential to achieving the targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), including universal health coverage. However, weak HWF planning and constrained fiscal space for...

A Fuller Great Salt Lake Would Likely Narrow an Environmental Health Gap

Pacific Islander and Hispanic residents of Salt Lake City would benefit most from higher lake levels and reduced dust pollution.

Differentiated Service Delivery Models for Maintaining HIV Treatment and Prevention Services During Crisis and Disease Outbreaks: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This review summarizes differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV treatment and prevention that have been adapted for maintaining continuity of services during the COVID-19 pandemic and proposes strategies for sustaining their benefits now and during future disruptions. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an overburdened and disrupted health system, forcing countries to adopt and/or scale up DSD models for HIV services. While initially implemented as emergency measures, these models evolved and were refined over time to fit recipient needs ensuring continued HIV treatment and prevention services with minimal health system impact. Successful models employed task shifting, community-based delivery models, multimonth scripting and dispensing, and telehealth for remote consultation. DSD models enabled HIV services globally to be maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic. Though these models and adaptations were critical in addressing health gaps and disruptions caused by the pandemic, they were beneficial in improving efficiency and access to client-centered services and should be sustained.

Exploring Nonspecialist Preparedness to Deliver an Evidence-Based, Family Strengthening Intervention in Rwanda: A Qualitative Study.

Families in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face significant mental health and psychosocial care gaps. In recent years, researchers and practitioners have addressed these gaps by task-sharing evidence-based mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions to nonspecialist community providers. Supervision and training approaches are intended to prepare nonspecialists to deliver evidence-based interventions with quality. However, there is still little research exploring nonspecialist experiences with training and supervision and how, if at all, their training and supervision experiences result in fidelity and competence in delivering the intervention. This qualitative study uses data from a cluster-randomized trial of a family strengthening and violence prevention program in Rwanda, known as Sugira Muryango. In semi-structured interviews, the nonspecialists provided examples of using skills such as rapport-building, empathy, and active listening to deliver Sugira Muryango effectively. Because nonspecialists were serving in their own communities, they found that it was easier to earn trust with friends and neighbors, and this facilitated effective delivery of Sugira Muryango. Nonspecialists discussed how training, monthly supervision, in-person monitoring visits, and the use of the manual and audio recorders equipped them to deliver Sugira Muryango with quality. Nonspecialists also provided examples of barriers to quality of delivery, including supervisor lack of availability, delayed compensation, and technology issues. Preparedness was consistent across gender; however, nonspecialists serving in a better-resourced district had previous experiences delivering evidence-based interventions and felt more prepared at the beginning of Sugira Muryango.