Allergy and Immunology| November 01 2004 Parents’ Management of Asthma Triggers AAP Grand Rounds (2004) 12 (5): 58–59. https://doi.org/10.1542/gr.12-5-58-a Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Parents’ Management of Asthma Triggers. AAP Grand Rounds November 2004; 12 (5): 58–59. https://doi.org/10.1542/gr.12-5-58-a Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All PublicationsAll JournalsAAP Grand RoundsPediatricsHospital PediatricsPediatrics In ReviewNeoReviewsAAP NewsAll AAP Sites Search Advanced Search Topics: asthma management, precipitating factors Source: Cabana MD, Slish KK, Lewis TC, et al. Parental management of asthma triggers within a child’s environment. J All Clin Immunol. 2004;114:352–357. This study from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, assessed parental attempts to decrease their children’s exposure to asthma triggers. Subjects were a random sample of 2- to 12-year-old children with asthma, identified from the patient panels of a convenience sample of 106 primary care practices from 10 geographic areas in the United States that were participating in a study of asthma health care utilization. Of 1,077 eligible patients, 896 (83%) completed interviews. In response to open-ended questions, parents identified triggers to their children’s asthma and the steps taken to eliminate those triggers. The authors categorized the types of triggers and actions taken. Each possible action was coded as either recommended (consistent with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NHLBI] Guidelines1), reasonable (thought by some clinicians to be helpful but without supporting evidence), neutral (no known positive or negative effects), or not recommended (harmful or discouraged by the NHLBI Guidelines). Respondents identified a mean of 2.2 ± 1.7 triggers (range 0–9) and took an average of 2 ± 1.6 actions (range 0–9). Of the 717 (80%) who identified at least 1 trigger, 135 (19%) did not attempt to decrease trigger exposure. The remainder (582, 81%) took an average of 3 actions per family. The most common actions included purchasing an air filter (25%), reducing dust exposure (22%), purchasing specialized vacuums and bedding (17%), increasing house cleaning (13%), and reducing animal exposure (11%). Fifty-one percent of actions were not likely to be useful (neutral), given the child’s known triggers. For example, only 70% of respondents who purchased an air filter had a child whose triggers would be reduced by using an air filter. Of 216 children (24%) living with a smoker, only 16 (7%) families attempted to decrease environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Forty-two percent of actions taken were consistent with NHLBI Guidelines. Only 1% of actions taken were not recommended. Multivariate analysis showed that receiving asthma education and an increased number of visits to the primary care physician were associated with an increased likelihood of taking at least 1 step toward trigger avoidance. For the 4 most common triggers (dust, animals, tobacco smoke, and mold), no demographic characteristic predicted which parents were more or less likely to take at least 1 recommended action to control exposure to that trigger. Trigger avoidance is an essential component of asthma care.1 Up to 90% of children with asthma have allergies,2 but non-specific irritant triggers (environmental tobacco smoke, viral infections, exercise, cold air) will affect all patients at some point. Complete avoidance of specific (allergic) and non-specific (irritant) triggers is impossible. For example, cat and dog dander are imported to the classroom on the clothing of pet owners, exposing those who do not own pets.3 However, reasonable attempts at avoidance should be made by every family with an asthmatic child. Treating... You do not currently have access to this content.
Read full abstract