Healthcare Staff Research Articles

Identifying and addressing health-related social needs: a Medicaid member perspective.

Multiple state and national health care organizations have invested in activities to screen for and address the health-related social needs (HRSNs) of their patients. However, patient perspectives concerning HRSN screening discussions and facilitated referrals to supports are largely unexplored. The main objectives of this study were to explore the ways in which Massachusetts Medicaid (MassHealth) members engage with their health care clinicians to discuss HRSNs, to identify common needs discussed, and to describe whether members feel these needs are being addressed by health care clinicians and staff. The study team performed a cross-sectional, qualitative research study that included in-depth, open-ended interviews with 44 adult MassHealth members. Interviews were conducted between June and October 2022. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and systematically coded for analysis, and common themes were reported. The data collected for this study were part of a larger independent evaluation of MassHealth's 2017-2022 Section 1115 Demonstration that granted authority from CMS to implement health care delivery system reforms in Massachusetts. In this qualitative study of Medicaid members, some reportedly felt comfortable freely discussing all of their clinical and social needs with their health care clinicians, while others noted feelings of apprehension. Several members recalled being asked about their HRSNs in various clinical or community settings, while others did not. The majority of members endorsed having an unmet HRSN, including housing, nutrition, financial, or transportation issues, and many barriers to addressing these HRSNs were discussed. Finally, many members cited a preference for discussing HRSNs with community-based care coordinators and social workers at the community partner organizations rather than with their health care clinicians. Community-based care coordinators were lauded as essential facilitators in making the connection to necessary resources to help address HRSNs. Study results highlight an opportunity to increase the effectiveness of HRSN screening and referral practices within the health care setting through relationship building between Medicaid members and diverse interdisciplinary care teams that include staff such as community health workers. Continued investment in cross-sector partnerships, screening workflows, and patient-clinician relationships may contribute to establishing an environment in which members can comfortably discuss HRSNs and connect with needed services to improve their health.

Projecting the Likely Impact of COVID-19 Infections on the Prevalence of Dementia in the United States.

The association between COVID-19 infection and the onset of dementia among adults 65 years and older has the potential to increase the burden of dementia worldwide significantly. Our research, which focuses on understanding the likely increase in the burden of dementia due to COVID-19 infection in the USA, has crucial public policy implications. By providing these insights, we aim to empower policymakers, healthcare professionals, researchers, and public health officials to make informed decisions and plan for the future. Project the prevalence of dementia in the United States while accounting for the impact of COVID-19 infection on the onset of dementia. A dynamic multi-state population model was developed. The model was initialized with USA demographic data and estimates of age, gender, and race-specific transition rates from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). The projected increase in the burden of dementia among Americans 65 years and older is a staggering 14.838 million by 2050. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we anticipate an additional 265,000 to 677,000 older adults 65 years and older will be affected by dementia. This will escalate the burden of dementia to a potential 15.103 million to 15.515 million by 2050, a significant human toll that we must be prepared for. The projected dementia numbers underscore the urgent need for policy and intervention in social care services and healthcare needs planning. This includes providing robust support systems for caregivers and ensuring the healthcare staff is adequately trained to meet the healthcare needs of dementia patients and their families.

Experiences of abortion care in Australia: a qualitative study examining multiple dimensions of access

BackgroundThe United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals identify universal access to sexual and reproductive health services as a global priority. Yet barriers to abortion access remain, including legal restrictions, cost, stigma, and limited services and information. The aim was to identify barriers to and facilitators of abortion care access experienced in Australia.MethodsThis qualitative phenomenological study examined abortion access in Australia, where abortion is decriminalised, from March 2020 to December 2022. We used social media and flyers in clinics to recruit adults who had sought abortion care, then interviewed them in-depth. We mapped participant experiences to five dimensions of access identified by Levesque et al.’s patient-centred access to healthcare framework: approachability, acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness.ResultsThe 24 participants lived across Australia and sought abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Approachability: Before seeking abortion, most did not know where to access information about the service and where to obtain it. Acceptability: Many were uncomfortable disclosing their abortion to family or friends; they reported that healthcare providers demonstrated varying levels of support. Availability and accommodation: Regional participants travelled far and faced long wait-times, exacerbated by pandemic restrictions. Affordability: Participants described financial stress paying for the service, travel, and related expenses. Appropriateness: Most participants expected judgemental care. Experiences varied widely: many participants experienced unempathetic, rushed, or judgemental interactions with healthcare staff, and many also reported at least one non-judgmental and supportive interaction on the same pathway to care.DiscussionAbortion seekers experienced varying obstacles when seeking care. The findings illustrate the need for population- and system-level initiatives such as: providing accurate information about and normalising abortion; implementing system-level strategies to reduce wait times, travel, and costs, especially for rural populations; and developing regulatory and quality improvement initiatives to increase the workforce and its readiness to provide high-quality, non-judgemental abortion care. Challenges seeking care during pandemic restrictions illustrate the importance of social support during care and choice between abortion modalities and service types. Consumer voices can help understand the diverse pathways to abortion care and inform solutions to overcome the multidimensional barriers to access.

Comparison of utility and organizational impact of reusable and single-use rhinolaryngoscopes in a tertiary otorhinolaryngology department.

Flexible rhinolaryngoscopes are an important tool in otolaryngology. In recent years, single-use rhinolaryngoscopes (SURLs), which have been developed as an alternative to reusable scopes (RRLs), offer various advantages including less risk of contamination and elimination of the need for cleaning and reprocessing between procedures. This study aimed to compare procedure efficiency, organizational impact, and economic impact between SURLs and RRLs used for elective procedures conducted outside the otorhinolaryngology department in the hospital environment. In this randomized prospective study, either type of endoscope was tested by on-call otolaryngologists over a total of twelve weeks. The organizational impact was investigated using a quantitative research design. All categories of stakeholders responded to specific surveys based on profession; these included doctors (n = 13), those in managerial positions (n = 3), and other healthcare staff including technicians and nurses (n = 11). A micro-costing approach was used to evaluate resource utilization and cost of services. The trial was uploaded to clinicaltrials.gov (ID number: NCT0519821, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05198219?intr=rhinolaryngo&rank=1). Overall, 14 and 12 procedures were performed using the SURLs and RRLs, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the endoscopes in terms of procedure duration, reported image quality, or maneuverability. The SURLs were significantly superior in terms of four organizational impact parameters, namely, modes of cooperation and communication, vigilance and monitoring methods, working conditions and safety, and logistics. The estimated per-procedure cost of the RRLs was SEK 536 (€ 34,68). The cost and effectiveness of RRLs and SURLs is influenced by the healthcare setting, procedure volume, and duration of device use. The adoption of SURLs can improve safety, streamline processes, and potentially reduce the risk of disease transmission.

Motif discovery in hospital ward vital signs observation networks

Vital signs observations are regular measurements used by healthcare staff to track a patient’s overall health status on hospital wards. We look at the potential in re-purposing aggregated and anonymised hospital data sources surrounding vital signs recording to provide new insights into how care is managed and delivered on wards. In this paper, we conduct a retrospective longitudinal observational study of 770,720 individual vital signs recordings across 20 hospital wards in South Wales (UK) and present a network modelling framework to explore and extract behavioural patterns via analysis of the resulting network structures at a global and local level. Self-loop edges, dyad, triad, and tetrad subgraphs were extracted and evaluated against a null model to determine individual statistical significance, and then combined into ward-level feature vectors to provide the means for determining notable behaviours across wards. Modelling data as a static network, by aggregating all vital sign observation data points, resulted in high uniformity but with the loss of important information which was better captured when modelling the static-temporal network, highlighting time’s crucial role as a network element. Wards mostly followed expected patterns, with chains or stand-alone supplementary observations by clinical staff. However, observation sequences that deviate from this are revealed in five identified motif subgraphs and 6 anti-motif subgraphs. External ward characteristics also showed minimal impact on the relative abundance of subgraphs, indicating a ‘superfamily’ phenomena that has been similarly seen in complex networks in other domains. Overall, the results show that network modelling effectively captured and exposed behaviours within vital signs observation data, and demonstrated uniformity across hospital wards in managing this practice.

Responsibility of follow-up regarding medical recommendations in primary care and challenging patients: The perspective of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and administrative staff

ObjectiveThis study examines the way healthcare staff describe challenging patients and perceive responsibility for follow-up of patients with chronic conditions. MethodsInterviews were conducted with 46 healthcare staff (15 primary care physicians/12 nurses/15 administrative staff/4 pharmacists) at 12 clinics in Israel. They were audiotaped, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using Atlas qualitative data analysis software. ResultsParticipants defined patients as “challenging” either because they are less likely to follow medical recommendations or are felt to overconsume care. Staff believed that patients did not follow medical recommendations because they were indifferent, unaware, in denial about deteriorating medical condition, or fear of the unknown. Participants generally perceived a shared responsibility for follow-up between the staff and the patient. Staff who endorsed closer relationships with staff members expressed empathy toward challenging patients and felt responsible for follow-up. ConclusionsHealthcare staff perceive themselves as partially responsible for helping patients follow up with medical recommendations. Cohesive staff relationships may promote higher levels of empathy toward challenging patients and may contribute to helping patients follow up with recommended care.Practice implicationsTo improve follow-up with medical recommendations, there is a need to develop and test interventions to promote more cohesive ties among clinic staff.

Following up on "Alarming sound: A case study of noise in an emergency department"

Building on "Alarming Sound: A Case Study on Noise in an Emergency Ward," this follow-up study aims to explore the outcomes of a redesigned floorplan on the Jeroen Bosch Hospital in the city of Den Bosch (NL), it's emergency department staff experiences and workplace dynamics focusing on sound. Leveraging both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies, the study seeks to investigate anticipated changes in staff satisfaction, communication efficiency, and the overall work environment following the implementation of spatial modifications. While the outcomes of these interventions are yet to be determined, the research aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on the impact of physical workspace changes on healthcare delivery and staff well-being. This research aims to help develop healthcare environments that improve working conditions and better patient care outcomes.

Enhancing Patient Safety Through an Integrated Internet of Things Patient Care System: Large Quasi-Experimental Study on Fall Prevention.

The challenge of preventing in-patient falls remains one of the most critical concerns in health care. This study aims to investigate the effect of an integrated Internet of Things (IoT) smart patient care system on fall prevention. A quasi-experimental study design is used. The smart patient care system is an integrated IoT system combining a motion-sensing mattress for bed-exit detection, specifying different types of patient calls, integrating a health care staff scheduling system, and allowing health care staff to receive and respond to alarms via mobile devices. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between the use of the IoT system and bedside falls compared with a traditional patient care system. In total, 1300 patients were recruited from a medical center in Taiwan. The IoT patient care system detected an average of 13.5 potential falls per day without any false alarms, whereas the traditional system issued about 11 bed-exit alarms daily, with approximately 4 being false, effectively identifying 7 potential falls. The bedside fall incidence during hospitalization was 1.2% (n=8) in the traditional patient care system ward and 0.1% (n=1) in the smart ward. We found that the likelihood of bedside falls in wards with the IoT system was reduced by 88% (odds ratio 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.97; P=.047). The integrated IoT smart patient care system might prevent falls by assisting health care staff with efficient and resilient responses to bed-exit detection. Future product development and research are recommended to introduce IoT into patient care systems combining bed-exit alerts to prevent inpatient falls and address challenges in patient safety.

A human-centered approach for designing a social care referral platform.

Health Information Technology (HIT) is increasingly being used to help providers connect patients with community resources to meet health related social needs (e.g., food, housing, transportation). Research is needed to design efficient, simple, and engaging interfaces during a sensitive process that involves multiple stakeholders. Research is also needed to understand the roles, expectations, barriers, and facilitators these different stakeholders (i.e., patients, providers, and Community-based Organizations (CBOs) face during this process. We applied the Human-Centered Design approach to develop a multi-interface social care referral platform. This approach allowed us to understand the needs of each stakeholder and address potential workflow concerns. This paper reports on the research team's understanding of the design process from 48 different user tests. We conducted three rounds of user testing on an interactive prototype(s) and adapted the prototype after each round. Our results summarize a number of key findings useful for patients, clinical teams, and staff of CBOs when designing a social care referral platform. Our user testing highlighted that patient-facing interfaces offer tremendous opportunities to allow patients to be the leader of the social care referral process. CBOs have varying needs that must be addressed, and providing CBO staff with opportunities to connect with patients is critical. Finally, healthcare teams have more structured workflows. Integration within the electronic health record system provides opportunities for healthcare staff to support their patients more easily given these barriers.

Staff wellbeing in context: considering the impact of world events

The editor highlights the importance of considering the impact of national and international events on healthcare staff, especially when planning interventions to improve wellbeing and team cohesion.

Sámi Healthcare Staff Experiences of Encounters with Sámi Patients and Their Expectations for Non-Sámi Healthcare Staff.

The aim of this study was to explore Sámi healthcare staff experiences in encounters with Sámi patients and their expectations for non-Sámi healthcare staff. Focus groups and individual interviews with 14 participants were conducted, and the participants' experiences were subjected to a thematic analysis approach. The findings show that the Sámi healthcare staff expect non-Sámi healthcare staff to enhance their knowledge about Sámi language and culture. The Sámi healthcare staff also expect non-Sámi healthcare staff to gain knowledge of diversities within the Sámi cultures. Additionally, the results show that the participants felt that the encounters were more authentic when the patients had the same background as themselves. These results were also based on the participants' experience of resistance from non-Sámi healthcare staff, which can be addressed by the non-Sámi healthcare staff and healthcare institutions enhancing their knowledge of Sámi history, culture, and language. This can be conducted by making efforts to meet the participants' expectations and experiences, enhancing their knowledge of Sámi history, culture, and language, and showing respect to provide culturally safe care. Further, tacit knowledge and what can be seen as "two-eyed seeing", as demonstrated by the participants, are not necessarily transferable to non-Sámi healthcare staff. Despite this, all healthcare staff, through experience, recognition, and reflections on encounters with Sámi patients and Sámi healthcare staff, can develop awareness in what is addressed as "two-eyed seeing" by the participants in this study.

Multilevel Factors Impacting Substance Use Treatment Access, Engagement, and Racial Equity Among Opioid Overdose Survivors in Boston, MA.

There are well-documented racial/ethnic inequities in drug-related overdoses and access to evidence-based opioid use services nationally and in Boston, MA. To qualitatively explore the drivers of racial/ethnic inequities in access to opioid use disorder treatment and services in Boston. Semi-structured qualitative interviews. Using purposive sampling, researchers recruited 59 opioid overdose survivors in Boston who self-identified as Black, Hispanic or Latino/a/x, and/or White. Interviewers administered a socio-demographic and drug use survey, and used a semi-structured interview guide to explore experiences with and perspectives on substance use treatment and services. Participants' racial/ethnic identities were distributed across three subgroups: non-Hispanic Black (n = 18; 31%), non-Hispanic White (n = 18; 31%), and Latino/a/x (n = 23; 39%). Qualitative analysis identified multiple themes that were organized into four social-ecological levels after analysis. At the individual level, some participants emphasized the importance of personal responsibility and individual motivation in determining access to services. Participants expressed a range of perspectives about using medication for opioid use disorder treatment; Black and Latino/a/x participants were more likely than White participants to have critical perspectives. At the interpersonal level, experiences of bias, stigma, and racism from staff in healthcare and treatment settings were common. At the program/process level, participants described challenges connecting to services following overdose and barriers within specific programs, with Black and Latino/a/x participants experiencing particular gaps. At the systems level, the limited availability of housing, employment, and mental health care negatively impacted treatment access and engagement. A racism lens was used during data interpretation to apply the themes at a broader population level. Through this lens, the identified barriers can be understood to have a disproportionate impact on people of color. Findings call for programmatic and policy solutions that address racism, break down stigma, and ensure equitable access to evidence-based services and social supports.

Chinese American Pain Experience Project (CAPE): Perceptions, Expectations, and Attitudes on Pain Management among Chinese American Postoperative Patients.

Chinese Americans are one of the fastest growing racial and ethnic groups and represent the largest subgroup of the Asian American population in the US and in New York City (NYC) where they number 573,528 in 2021. Despite their numbers, current pain perceptions, expectations, and attitudes of Chinese Americans remains poorly understood, especially as related to postoperative pain. A better understanding of pain experience among Chinese American patients is needed to inform strategies on improving pain management satisfaction. A total of 27 Chinese American postoperative patients from a NYC health system were recruited for face-to-face surveys and interviews with a trained bilingual and bicultural Community Health Worker. Questions from the Survey on Disparities in Quality of Healthcare and Kleinman's Explanatory Model of Illness were integrated into the survey and topic guide. Topics of discussion included satisfaction with healthcare and pain management during hospital stay and health beliefs and practices. More than half of participants experienced language challenges that made it difficult to communicate with healthcare staff. In general, high levels of satisfaction with pain management were reported; however, participants reported feeling less comfortable asking healthcare teams questions. Common themes across interviews included: (1) pain was an expected outcome of the procedure and was thus perceived as tolerable; (2) the wish to not be a burden to others; (3) concerns about side effects of pain medications; and (4) a cultural and language mismatch between healthcare teams and patients on words being used to elicit pain and discomfort. Our project findings can inform pain management strategies and tools to serve the Chinese American patient population.

Patient Self-Management of Kidney Diseases: A Health Care Staff Perspective

Patient Self-Management of Kidney Diseases: A Health Care Staff Perspective

Efficiency of night shifts in Primary Healthcare Centers, Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia: Data envelopment analysis

BACKGROUND: Efficient allocation of healthcare resources is essential for meeting the increasing demand for healthcare services. This study aimed at exploring the performance of both one- and two-shift Primary Healthcare Centers (PHCCs) and examining the efficiency of healthcare centers to discover how efficiency is affected by the levels of resource allocation and staffing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at 31 PHCCs assigned to cover extended hours, from 4:00 PM to 8:00 AM during May-October 2023. Study employed a quantitative approach and the data envelopment analysis technique to assess the efficiency of PHCCs, specifically focusing on night shift performance. Data were collected through interviews and surveys with primary healthcare staff including 99 doctors, 119 nurses, and 139 support staff using structured questionnaire. The DEA technique was utilized to measure the relative efficiency of the PHCCs by comparing the inputs and outputs. RESULTS: Out of 31 PHCCs, 45.2% run two shifts. Over the reported period, a total of 126,619 patient visits were recorded; 81.7% came to the two-shift PHCCs and 18.3% to the one-shift PHCCs. On average, each two-shift PHCC received approximately 161 visits/ shift, and the one-shift received 123 visits. Upper respiratory tract infections accounted for 30% of morbidities and chronic diseases for more than 20%. The performance of the two-shifts PHCCs revealed varying levels of efficiency with a score of 1.00 for the most efficient PHCC and 0.31 for the least efficient PHCC. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the importance of data-driven decision-making for healthcare administrators. Ongoing assessments and benchmarking are essential for continuously improving the quality of healthcare service and optimizing utilization of resources. Future research in this field can further explore the factors that contribute to healthcare efficiency and provide deeper insights into healthcare resource management and optimization of service delivery.

Are Healthcare Staff Ready for the Dengue Fever Epidemic Challenge?

Are Healthcare Staff Ready for the Dengue Fever Epidemic Challenge?

A preventive care approach for oral health in nursing homes: a qualitative study of healthcare workers’ experiences

BackgroundOral health problems are common among care-dependent older adults living in nursing homes. Developing strategies to prevent the deterioration of oral health is therefore crucial to avoid pain and tooth loss. A standardized work widely used in nursing homes in Sweden is the quality register Senior Alert (SA), which assesses age-related risks concerning e.g. pressure sores, falls, malnutrition and oral health. The oral health assessment is performed with the Revised Oral Assessment Guide-Jönköping (ROAG-J), which also includes planning and implementation of preventive oral care interventions with the goal of achieving good quality care. However, what facilitates and hinders healthcare workers in working with oral health in SA remains unexplored. The aim of this study was to describe healthcare workers’ experiences of assessing oral health with the ROAG-J, planning and performing preventive oral health care actions in accordance with SA in nursing homes.MethodsHealthcare workers (n = 28) in nursing homes in two Swedish municipalities participated and data was collected through six focus group interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify patterns of meaning in the data.ResultsThemes generated in the analysis were:A structured process promotes communication and awareness and stresses the importance of oral health;Oral care for frail older adults is challenging and triggers ethical dilemmas;Unclear responsibilities, roles and routines in the organization put oral health at risk;Differences in experience and competence among healthcare staff call for educational efforts.ConclusionsThe structured way of working increases staff awareness and prioritization of oral health in nursing homes. The main challenges for the healthcare workers were residents’ reluctance to participate in oral care activities and oral care being more complicated since most older adults today are dentate. Organizational challenges lay in creating good routines and clarifying staff roles and responsibilities, which will require continuous staff training and increased management involvement.

A process mining model to detect adverse patient safety events: Blood products watch

Introduction Patient safety incidents and adverse events are reported voluntarily by healthcare staff. The Global Trigger Tool, developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, is used to capture unreported events. The objective of the new model is to use process mining in the context of adverse event detection to increase reporting efficiency. Methods In the first phase, the process mining model is used to discover the actual process map by querying inpatient processes using the provided log data. Transfusions of blood or blood products within 24 h after surgery, a subset of The Transfusion of Blood or Use of Blood Products trigger of Institute for Healthcare Improvement (GTT-C1) was deployed as a process pattern within the actual process map. Only detected patients were reviewed in the last phase. Results The model ran on a single hospital data set, which included 2870 patients, 1048 of which included surgeries. The model reduced the analyzed data to 57 patients. The expert group analyzed these 57 patients and defined 12 adverse events. The calculated adverse event ratio was 1.1%, comparable with other manual Global Trigger Tool studies. In addition, the reviewers’ time required decreased by 94.6%, from 138.28 to 7.52 h. Two reviewers validated the model by reviewing a sample of patients. Conclusions Process mining can be used in healthcare institutions to conduct routine surveillance and detect unreported safety events. This allows healthcare providers to allocate financial and human resources to more urgent needs and increase efficiency. Further research is needed to evaluate the model with other triggers.

Primary healthcare nurses' experiences in managing chronic diseases during COVID-19 in the North West province.

The World Health Organization, stated that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic not only affected the socioeconomic well-being of millions but also had adverse effects on public health, particularly in the management of chronic diseases at the primary healthcare (PHC) level. What remained unknown was the experiences of professional nurses(PNs) working in PHC regarding this issue. The study aimed to explore and describe the lived experiences of PHC nurses in managing chronic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted in the North West province, South Africa. A qualitative descriptive phenomenological design was employed to collect and analyse data. Face-to-face interviews were conducted and audio recorded with 16 PNs from five high-volume PHC facilities selected purposively. The study's findings reveal four themes: suboptimal care for patients with chronic disease, a lack of resources, mental health challenges experienced by PHC nurses, and stigma and discrimination from both family and community members. The neglect of PHC and its frontline healthcare staff has impeded the mental health of PHC workers and the management of chronic diseases thus any progress made in reducing the burden of chronic diseases is likely to have regressed during the COVID-19 pandemic.Contribution:Policymakers should prioritise strengthening PHC by implementing integrated disease management policies, ensuring ethical clinical standards, providing supportive supervision, fair resource allocation and capacity building for PHC staff. In addition, addressing stigma and discrimination, and raising awareness among families and communities is crucial for future pandemics to effectively manage both chronic and infectious diseases.

Comprehensive risk management and safety strategies in radiation use in medical imaging

Radiation use in medical imaging, while essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning, poses inherent risks that require comprehensive risk management and safety strategies. This review discusses the critical aspects of managing these risks in clinical settings, focusing on patient safety, staff protection, and environmental considerations. A major challenge in medical imaging is balancing the diagnostic benefits of radiation against potential harms, particularly in sensitive populations such as children and pregnant women. Comprehensive risk management involves implementing dose optimization techniques, such as using low-dose imaging protocols and advanced technologies like iterative reconstruction and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, which enhance image quality while minimizing exposure. Additionally, ensuring the safety of healthcare staff is paramount. This requires adherence to strict safety protocols, including the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), regular monitoring of radiation levels, and continuous education on safe radiation practices. Institutional policies must also address the proper maintenance and calibration of imaging equipment to prevent unnecessary exposure due to equipment malfunction or improper use. Environmental safety is another critical component, necessitating the safe disposal of radioactive materials and the adoption of energy-efficient technologies to reduce the environmental footprint of medical imaging. Regulatory compliance with international safety standards, such as those set by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and national bodies, is essential for ensuring consistent safety practices across healthcare institutions. Future directions in radiation safety include the integration of digital health technologies to monitor and manage radiation exposure more effectively, and ongoing research into novel imaging techniques that could further reduce radiation risks. Collaboration between healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers is crucial to advancing safety standards and improving risk management strategies in medical imaging. This review highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to managing radiation risks in medical imaging, emphasizing the need for continuous innovation, education, and policy support to protect patients, healthcare workers, and the environment.