Perspectives Of Healthcare Professionals Research Articles

Family Member Experiences in Intensive Care Units Care: Insights From a Family Involvement Tool Implementation Trial.

Family involvement is widely considered an important part of patient care in the intensive care unit. From professional health care organizations, government, and hospital associations, there has been a cultural shift toward family presence as part of a wider commitment to patient-centered care. At the same time, the meaning and impact of family involvement in the intensive care unit setting remain opaque and under-studied. This study employed an ethnographic approach to better understand family involvement in practice and from the perspective of health care professionals and family members by studying an implementation trial of a family involvement tool in two intensive care units over 2 years. The findings revealed that an expanded and self-defined role for family members as carers in the intensive care unit challenged the current configuration of the nurse patient/family relationship and that family members were aware of these dynamics. While the intensive care unit implementation teams were both motivated to implement a novel way of facilitating family involvement, the processual, organizational, and contextual factors in the intensive care units largely determined the possibilities of its application. This suggests that interventions should address the specific context in which they are employed.

Views of healthcare professionals on complementary and alternative medicine use by patients with diabetes: a qualitative study

BackgroundRecent estimates indicate that a significant proportion of diabetic patients globally, up to 51%, are utilizing complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). To improve patient-provider communication and optimize prescribed treatments, healthcare professionals (HCPs) must understand the factors associated with CAM use among diabetic patients. There is a dearth of literature on HCPs perspectives on CAM use by diabetic patients. This study explored HCPs knowledge, perspective, and views on their diabetic patients’ use of CAM.MethodsQualitative study using one-to-one semi-structured interviews conducted with 22 HCPs involved in the care of diabetic patients (6 endocrinologists, 4 general practitioners, 4 nurses and 8 pharmacists). Participants were recruited through general practices, community pharmacies and a diabetic centre in Saudi Arabia. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsFive key themes resulted from the analysis. HCPs generally demonstrated negative perceptions toward CAM, particularly regarding their evidence-based effectiveness and safety. Participants described having limited interactions with diabetic patients regarding CAM use due to HCPs’ lack of knowledge about CAM, limited consultation time and strict consultation protocols. Participants perceived convenience as the reason why patients use CAM. They believed many users lacked patience with prescribed medications to deliver favourable clinical outcomes and resorted to CAM use.ConclusionsHCPs have noted inadequate engagement with diabetic patients regarding CAM due to a lack of knowledge and resources. To ensure the safe use of CAM in diabetes and optimize prescribed treatment outcomes, one must address the communication gap by implementing a flexible consultation protocol and duration. Additionally, culturally sensitive, and evidence-based information should be available to HCPs and diabetic patients.

Health Care Professionals' and Parents' Perspectives on the Use of AI for Pain Monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Multisite Qualitative Study.

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) for pain assessment has the potential to address historical challenges in infant pain assessment. There is a dearth of information on the perceived benefits and barriers to the implementation of AI for neonatal pain monitoring in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from the perspective of health care professionals (HCPs) and parents. This qualitative analysis provides novel data obtained from 2 large tertiary care hospitals in Canada and the United Kingdom. The aim of the study is to explore the perspectives of HCPs and parents regarding the use of AI for pain assessment in the NICU. In total, 20 HCPs and 20 parents of preterm infants were recruited and consented to participate from February 2020 to October 2022 in interviews asking about AI use for pain assessment in the NICU, potential benefits of the technology, and potential barriers to use. The 40 participants included 20 HCPs (17 women and 3 men) with an average of 19.4 (SD 10.69) years of experience in the NICU and 20 parents (mean age 34.4, SD 5.42 years) of preterm infants who were on average 43 (SD 30.34) days old. Six themes from the perspective of HCPs were identified: regular use of technology in the NICU, concerns with regard to AI integration, the potential to improve patient care, requirements for implementation, AI as a tool for pain assessment, and ethical considerations. Seven parent themes included the potential for improved care, increased parental distress, support for parents regarding AI, the impact on parent engagement, the importance of human care, requirements for integration, and the desire for choice in its use. A consistent theme was the importance of AI as a tool to inform clinical decision-making and not replace it. HCPs and parents expressed generally positive sentiments about the potential use of AI for pain assessment in the NICU, with HCPs highlighting important ethical considerations. This study identifies critical methodological and ethical perspectives from key stakeholders that should be noted by any team considering the creation and implementation of AI for pain monitoring in the NICU.

Symptoms and need for individualised support during the first year after primary treatment for breast cancer-A qualitative study.

The survival rate among patients with breast cancer is high. It is well described that after primary treatment patients may experience symptoms and concerns but the needs and resources during the first year to manage everyday life are not well described. To describe experiences of symptom distress, needs and support during the first year after primary treatment for breast cancer from the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals. Qualitative descriptive. Data collection through individual interviews with patients (n = 17) and a focus group interview with healthcare professionals (n = 7). Data was analysed using thematic analysis and resulted in three themes. The first theme, 'Struggling with symptoms and changes in everyday life' shows how symptoms and concerns interfered with the everyday life of patients and in some situations even impeded them. Patients try to adapt to their new situation by creating new routines and managing symptoms through self-care. The second theme, 'Adaption in a period of uncertainty' describes thoughts about cancer recurrence and doubts about continuing with the endocrine therapy if symptoms prolong. In the third theme, 'Support and need for individualized follow-up care' healthcare professionals described that they provide support by being available and by giving both verbal and written information. Patients expressed that the information could be too general and voiced a need for more individually tailored support. During the first year after primary treatment, patients with breast cancer describe how they try to manage by themselves, but express both unmet needs and a wish for extended and more individually tailored support. The healthcare professionals recognised that patients lack a structured plan for the first year and the need for continued support. This stresses a need for development of care models with special consideration towards individualised support after breast cancer treatment. There was no patient or public involvement in the design or conduct of the study. The interview study was not considered to benefit from involving patients or healthcare professionals when designing the interview guides as they were developed through literature and previous research of patients treated for breast cancer.

Reimagine the ICU: Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on How Environments (Can) Promote Patient Well-Being.

This study aims (1) to understand the needs and challenges of the current intensive care unit (ICU) environments in supporting patient well-being from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and (2) to explore the new potential of ICU environments enabled by technology. Evidence-based design has yielded how the design of environments can advocate for patient well-being, and digital technology offers new possibilities for indoor environments. However, the role of technology in facilitating ICU patient well-being has been unexplored. This study was conducted in two phases. First, a mixed-method study was conducted with ICU HCPs from four Dutch hospitals. The study investigated the current environmental support for care activities, as well as the factors that positively and negatively contribute to patient experience. Next, a co-creation session was held involving HCPs and health technology experts to explore opportunities for technology to support ICU patient well-being. The mixed-method study revealed nine negative and eight positive patient experience factors. HCPs perceived patient emotional care as most challenging due to the ICU workload and a lack of environmental support in fulfilling patient emotional needs. The co-creation session yielded nine technology-enabled solutions to address identified challenges. Finally, drawing from insights from both studies, four strategies were introduced that guide toward creating technology to provide holistic and personalized care for patients. Patient experience factors are intertwined, necessitating a multifactorial approach to support patient well-being. Viewing the ICU environment as a holistic unit, our findings provide guidance on creating healing environments using technology.

P285 Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey: European and US Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives on the Broad Impact of Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative colitis

Abstract Background Bowel urgency (BU) affects quality of life and psychosocial function of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This study used data from the Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) survey to explore the patient and health care professional (HCP) perceptions on the broad impact of BU on patients’ emotions and daily lives. Methods Online, quantitative, cross-sectional surveys were conducted among patients with moderate-to-severe UC and HCPs in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK), the United States (US) and Japan. Data from Europe and US are presented here. A 7-point scale was used to rate the emotional impact of BU (Patients: 1=does not make me feel like this at all, 7=makes me feel like this a great deal; HCPs: 1=patients do not experience at all, 7=patients experience a great deal) and interference of BU with 12 different aspects of patients’ daily lives (Patients: 1=does not interfere, 7=interferes a great deal; HCPs: 1=no impact on patients and 7=impacts patients a great deal). Results Surveys were completed by 556 patients and 503 HCPs in Europe and 200 patients and 200 HCPs in the US. Among patients experiencing BU in the past month (Europe:30%, US:47%), most reported emotional impacts due to BU (mean rating [MR]≥4.1), as did the HCPs (MR≥5.2). In Europe, patients felt embarrassed when having to run to the bathroom due to BU (MR=5.0); HCPs reported that patients felt anxious/nervous due to BU as well as panic and embarrassment when having to run to bathroom due to BU (MR=5.8 each; Figure). In the US, similar to patients (MR=4.8), HCPs (MR=5.8) perceived their patients felt anxious/nervous due to BU. Impacts of BU on daily life were reported by patients (MR≥4.2) and HCPs (MR≥4.6). In Europe, patients reported a high impact on spontaneous activities (MR=5.1); HCPs reported a high impact on patients’ ability to travel (MR=5.8; Table). In the US, patients reported a high impact of BU on the choice (variety) and quantity of food/drinks (MR=5.2 each); HCPs perceived a high impact on patients’ spontaneous activities and ability to travel (MR=5.7 each). While most HCPs (Europe:58%, US:54%) ranked BU among top five most impactful symptoms, it was not among the top three most impactful symptoms on treatment decisions. Conclusion In both Europe and US, BU affected patients emotionally and limited their ability to travel and make spontaneous plans. Despite the broad impact of BU from both HCP and patient perspectives, with HCPs perceiving (numerically) a higher impact than patients, it was not among the top three most impactful symptoms on HCPs’ treatment decisions. Increased awareness of BU among HCPs is needed when making treatment decisions for patients with UC.

Defining a balance by compromising with fear: A grounded theory study on returning to eating after a total gastrectomy.

Gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy face nutrition-related complications and worsening quality of life after surgery. In this context, gastrectomized cancer patients are required to cope with new conditions. Little is known about their accommodating feeding to the new life condition as a negotiated process among stakeholders in real contexts. This study aimed to investigate the shaping of this process as influenced by the perspectives of patients, health-care professionals (HPs), and caregivers (CGs). A constructivist grounded theory study, through semi-structured interviews and interpretative coding, was designed to answer the following research question: "what is the process of returning to eating and feeding after a gastrectomy?" The final sample included 18 participants. "Defining a balance by compromising with fear" is the core category explaining returning to eating as a process negotiated by all actors involved, with patients trying to find a feeding balance through a multi-layer compromise: with the information received by HPs, the proprioception drastically altered by gastric resection, new dietary habits to accept, and complex and often minimized conviviality. This process involves 4 main conceptual phases: relying on the doctors' advice, perceptive realignment, rearranging food intake, and food-regulated social interaction. Those categories are also shaped by the fear of being unwell from eating and the constant fear of tumor relapse. Multiple actors can meet patients' and their CGs' nutritional, care, and psychosocial needs. A multidisciplinary approach involving nutritionists, psychologists, occupational therapists, social workers, and anthropologists can be key to effectively managing these patients' survivorship care. We suggest training all the professionals on the first level of nutritional counseling.

Palliative Care for Cancer Patients in Asia: Challenges and Countermeasures.

With the increasing incidence of cancer worldwide, palliative care has become an effective intervention to relieve cancer patients' pain and improve their quality of life, although the present development of palliative medicine and hospice care in many Asian countries remains insufficient. To this end, this review comprehensively discussed the main challenges that influence the promotion of palliative medicine, from the perspective of both healthcare professionals and cancer patients. We further proposed and summarized a series of potentially effective countermeasures and solutions, including the shared decision-making modal, multidisciplinary professional cooperation, application of modern science and technology, standardization training for medical workers, personalized palliative treatment regimens, and others, aiming to improve the clinical quality of palliative care practice for cancer patients and promote the development of palliative medicine in Asian regions.

Motivation to participate and attrition factors in a COVID-19 biobank: A qualitative study

BackgroundThe Biobanque québécoise de la COVID-19 (Quebec Biobank for COVID-19, or BQC19) is a provincial initiative that aims to manage the longitudinal collection, storage, and sharing of biological samples and clinical data related to COVID-19. During the study, BQC19 investigators reported a high loss-to-follow-up rate. The current study aimed to explore motivational and attrition factors from the perspective of BQC19 participants and health care and research professionals. MethodsThis was an inductive exploratory qualitative study. Using a theoretical sampling approach, a sample of BQC19 participants and professionals were invited to participate via semi-structured interviews. Topics included motivations to participate; participants’ fears, doubts, and barriers to participation; and professionals’ experiences with biobanking during the COVID-19 pandemic. ResultsInterviews were conducted with BQC19 participants (n = 23) and professionals (n = 17) from 8 clinical data collection sites. Motivations included the contribution to science and society in crisis, self-worth, and interactions with medical professionals. Reasons for attrition included logistical barriers, negative attitudes about public health measures or genomic studies, fear of clinical settings, and a desire to move on from COVID-19. Motivations and barriers seemed to evolve over time and with COVID-19 trends and surges. Certain situations were associated with attrition, such as when patients experienced indirect verbal consent during hospitalization. Barriers related to human and material resources and containment/prevention measures limited the ability of research teams to recruit and retain participants, especially in the ever-evolving context of crisis. ConclusionThe pandemic setting impacted participation and attrition, either by influencing participants’ motivations and barriers or by affecting research teams’ ability to recruit and retain participants. Longitudinal and/or biobanking studies in a public health crisis setting should consider these factors to limit attrition.

“VR is the future”: perspectives of healthcare professionals on virtual reality as a diagnostic tool for dementia status in primary care

BackgroundHealthcare professionals (HPs) hold critical perspectives on the barriers and facilitating factors for the implementation of virtual reality (VR) dementia diagnosis tools in the clinical setting. This study aims to explore HP perspectives regarding the clinical implementation of dementia diagnosis tools using VR platforms.MethodsAn exploratory qualitative interview study was carried out between July and September 2022. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with HPs (n = 7) with clinical expertise in dementia diagnoses drawn from medicine, nursing and allied health practices. A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was used to frame the interview data across the dementia diagnosis pathway and application of new technology.ResultsHPs were on average 36.29 years old (SD = 11.56) with 11.85 years of experience (SD = 12.80, range:4–42). Analyses identified three main themes related to the contemporary methods of dementia diagnosis, dementia diagnosis and the medical landscape and HP perspectives on the usefulness and barriers of VR implementation. VR was considered an innovative prospect, with improved ecological validity compared to commonplace, current cognitive assessments. Concerns of time commitments, monetary costs and the validity of the new technology were identified as key barriers to implementation. Overall, implementation of a new diagnostic tool was considered a complex process.ConclusionsOur insight into general practice and nursing clinics can be supported to embed and integrate virtual reality platforms in primary care settings. Primary healthcare organizations require more funding and time related resources to produce a context in which VR tools could be implemented in a beneficial manner.

Life situation of older people living with severe mental illness - A scoping review.

An increasing number of older people with severe mental illness (SMI) poses additional challenges to healthcare and social services. This scoping review aimed to investigate the life situation of older people living with severe mental illness and identify the research gaps in the existing literature. The current review followed the methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews by Arksey and O'Malley, consisting of five main stages: (1) identifying the research question (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting the studies, (4) charting the data, and (5) collating, summarising, and reporting the results. An optional sixth stage, a consultation exercise, has also been used in this study: The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews PRISMA-ScR, and the databases PsychINFO Scopus, Cinahl, Web of Science and PubMed were used. A total of 24 studies were included in the review. The thematic analysis focused on: (1) the perspective of older people with SMI, (2) the perspective of healthcare professionals supporting older people with SMI, and (3) the perspective of informal carers supporting older people with SMI. The results describe the life situation of older people living with SMI, especially in relation to the older peoples' experiences of suffering and well-being. The staff and the informal carers need adequate knowledge to provide support to the older people with SMI. To gain greater knowledge about the life situation and support needed by older people with SMI, we strongly advocate additional research focusing on their own experiences.

Patient Outcomes of a Virtual Reality-Based Music Therapy Pilot in Palliative Care.

Hospitalized patients with palliative care needs often have high levels of physical and psychological symptom distress. Virtual reality (VR) with a music therapy intervention may improve physical and psychological symptoms. To assess symptom distress and quality of life (QOL) among hospitalized palliative care patients who participated in a virtual reality-based music therapy (VR-MT) intervention, and to explore VR-MT from the perspectives of health care professionals involved in their care. Single-arm pilot study of a two-day VR-MT intervention. Patients seen by an inpatient palliative care consultation service at a U.S. hospital could participate in the VR-MT intervention. Participants created a customized soundtrack with a music therapist and then listened to it while experiencing a 360-degree VR nature-based environment of their choice. Patients completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, revised version (ESAS-r) and McGill Quality of Life, revised version (MQOL-R) before and after VR-MT. Members of the participants' health care teams were interviewed. Seventeen patients completed VR-MT (range 20-79 years of age, 59% women). Moderate clinical improvements were observed for total ESAS-r score (Cohen's d effect size, 0.68), physical distress subscale (0.52), and psychological distress subscale (0.60); small improvements were observed in total MQOL-r score (0.26) and the existential subscale (0.27). Health care team members described the value of VR-MT as facilitating meaningful conversations. This pilot study of VR combined with a music therapy intervention for hospitalized patients with palliative care needs supports opportunities for future study of potential improvements in symptom distress and QOL.

Indigenous health in specialized care: perspective of healthcare professionals in a reference hospital in Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil

This cross-sectional study aims to identify the perspective of healthcare professionals and residents regarding the challenges faced in providing care to Indigenous users in a reference hospital in Mato Grosso do Sul, a Brazilian state with the second-largest Indigenous population in the country. The study used a semi-structured online questionnaire emailed to each worker between June and August 2020. The discrete variables were summarized as mean and standard deviation and median and interquartile range (5% significance level). Two hundred thirty healthcare professionals and 29 residents participated in the study. Among the findings, only 14.7% of participants knew the ethnicities served, and 60.2% had never witnessed traditional practices in the hospital, indicating low articulation between biomedical and Indigenous forms of care. When comparing responses from residents and professionals, residents were noted to have a more positive view of approaching the Indigenous context, suggesting that they consider it essential to improve this articulation. When comparing professional categories, some differences of opinion among the medical category stand out concerning assistance. In addition, professionals and residents demonstrated some level of difficulty in caring for the Indigenous population. The results highlight the centrality of the biomedical model, the professionals' lack of knowledge about the context of the communities served, and the devaluation of their practices. The findings contribute to discussions about healthcare policies at different levels of care and management and the qualification of hospital care for Indigenous people.

Framing Physical Literacy for Adults Through a Rehabilitation Lens: An Expert Consensus Study.

Research indicates a positive relationship between physical literacy and healthy aging; however, there is no consensus on the components required to become a physically literate adult. The objective of this study was to understand how physical literacy for adults with chronic conditions is characterized from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Physiotherapy leaders and physical literacy researchers within North America were invited to an online consensus panel and presented with questions related to physical literacy and rehabilitation. A nominal group technique was used for idea generation, clarification, and ranking. Confidence and safety with movements, motivation and commitment to physical activity, the ability to self-monitor changes in function, and understanding the benefits of physical activity were key components when defining physical literacy. There is a need to reconceptualize physical literacy to include the rehabilitation needs of adults living with chronic conditions, and to design programs that promote physical literacy to enhance function and mobility.

Care in a “no man's land”: perspectives of healthcare professionals on post-diagnostic care for people with vascular cognitive impairment and their caregivers – a focus group study.

Care in a “no man's land”: perspectives of healthcare professionals on post-diagnostic care for people with vascular cognitive impairment and their caregivers – a focus group study.

Self-care for maternal and reproductive health in conflict settings: qualitative case study in Nuba Mountains, Sudan.

Self-care is a critical component of Reproductive, Maternal, and Neonatal Health (RMNH), offering women the knowledge, skills, and autonomy needed for well-being throughout the reproductive cycle. This paper explores the significance of self-care in conflict-affected regions, where access to formal healthcare is limited. Such areas place pregnant women at higher risk due to increased incidents of adverse events during pregnancy and childbirth. Self-care interventions have the potential to enhance access to quality healthcare services. Employing a qualitative approach, this study explores RMNH self-care practices among pregnant and post-natal women in the Nuba Mountains. The methods included in-depth semi-structured interviews with 24 participants, comprising pregnant women, recent mothers, and healthcare providers. Purposive sampling was used to capture the experiences of mothers, and thematic analysis identified key patterns and themes in self-care practices. The perspectives of healthcare professionals were included to understand the context of RMNH care in conflict settings. The study revealed the crucial role of community cohesion in providing emotional and practical support in pregnancy, childbirth, and in the post-natal period. Limited healthcare infrastructure and ongoing conflict-related challenges provided important drivers for self-care practices. A spectrum of self-care interventions ranged from personal hygiene practices to community-supported childbirth and postnatal care. Significant reliance on elder women's wisdom and traditional midwifery was observed, particularly in the absence of formal healthcare facilities. Some women moved to live with family close to the hospital in the weeks before their due dates in order to mitigate the risks of early deliveries, complications, or general insecurity in their home areas. The findings present a compelling narrative of communal self-care, challenging the conventional notion of self-care as solely individualistic. In this setting, the community's role is fundamental, with knowledge sharing and mutual support forming the bedrock of maternal health practices. Elder women, embodying repositories of perceived traditional wisdom, emerge as central figures, guiding pregnant and postpartum women through shared experiences and practices. This collective approach is not merely a cultural characteristic but a necessity born out of the region's limited healthcare infrastructure and ongoing conflict. The study underscores the need to recognize and integrate these communal self-care strategies into broader health interventions.

When genetics and pediatric cancer collide: Understanding and optimizing families' experiences.

Advances in our understanding of the genetic basis of childhood cancer, including primary central nervous system cancers, are improving the diagnosis, treatment, and clinical management of pediatric patients. To effectively translate scientific breakthroughs into enhanced clinical care, it is essential we understand and learn from the experiences of patients, families, and health professionals. This report summarizes findings from 4 Australian psychosocial substudies exploring the perspectives of patients, parents, clinicians, and scientists participating in research related to childhood cancer genetics. Specifically, these studies focus on the psychosocial impact of germline testing in children, surveillance for children with a cancer predisposition syndrome and the perspectives of healthcare professionals who deliver this testing and surveillance. Data presented highlight some of the opportunities and challenges associated with the changing context of genetic predisposition testing for children, adolescentsand yound adults with cancer and illustrate how embedding psychosocial data collection in clinical research can answer important questions in the field and inform the design of patient-centric models of care, resources, and workforce training. By embracing these perspectives, we can ensure that advances in genetic research translate into enhanced family experiences, and, ultimately, improved outcomes for children and young people with cancer, and their families.

Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in High-Stakes Resource Allocation

The allocation of scarce resources in healthcare, especially during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, presents complex ethical dilemmas. This study aims to explore these dilemmas through the perspectives of healthcare professionals, policymakers, and ethics experts to better understand the underlying principles and challenges that influence ethical decision-making in high-stakes resource allocation. This qualitative study utilized semi-structured interviews with 20 participants, including healthcare professionals, policymakers, and ethics experts involved in resource allocation. Data were collected until theoretical saturation was achieved and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key themes and concepts related to ethical dilemmas in resource allocation. Four main themes were identified: Justice and Fairness, Stakeholder Perspectives, Resource Constraints, and Ethical Decision-Making Models. Each theme encompassed various categories with specific concepts: Equity in Access, Prioritization Principles, Transparency, Decision-Maker Challenges, Ethical Conflict Resolution, Patient and Public Involvement, Allocation Efficiency, Sustainability, Framework Utilization, Adaptation and Flexibility, Dilemma Specificity, and Implementation Challenges. These themes highlight the complexity of ethical decision-making and the variety of factors that must be considered. The study reveals that ethical decision-making in resource allocation is influenced by a complex interplay of fairness, stakeholder perspectives, resource limitations, and the application of various ethical frameworks. It underscores the need for adaptable, transparent, and inclusive policies that can address the nuanced challenges posed by crises in healthcare settings.

Enhancing medication management of older adults in Qatar: healthcare professionals' perspectives on challenges, barriers and enabling solutions.

Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications are significant challenges in older adults' medication management. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a comprehensive approach used to explore barriers and enablers to the healthcare system in guiding the effective implementation of evidence-based practices. This study examines the barriers and enablers to promote safe medication management among older adults in Qatar from healthcare professionals' perspectives. This includes identifying critical factors within the healthcare system influencing medication management and suggesting practical solutions to improve it. The study employs a qualitative design. Focus Groups (FGs) were conducted with healthcare professionals from the geriatric, mental health and medicine departments of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), the leading governmental sector in Qatar serving the older adult population. Utilising the CFIR, this study analysed feedback from healthcare professionals through FGs at HMC. A combined inductive and deductive thematic analysis was applied to transcripts from five FGs, focusing on identifying barriers and enablers to safe medication management among older adults. Two researchers transcribed the audio-recorded FG discussions verbatim, and two researchers analysed the data using a mixed inductive and deductive thematic analysis approach utilising CFIR constructs. We engaged 53 healthcare professionals (31 physicians, 10 nurses and 12 clinical pharmacists) in FGs. The analysis identified current barriers and enabler themes under different CFIR constructs, including inner settings, outer settings, individual characteristics and intervention characteristics. We identified 44 themes, with 25 classifieds as barriers and 19 as enablers. The findings revealed that barriers and enablers within the inner settings were primarily related to structural characteristics, resources, policies, communication and culture. On the other hand, barriers and enablers from the outer settings included patients and caregivers, care coordination, policies and laws, and resources. This study identified several barriers and enablers to promote medication management for older adults using the CFIR constructs from the perspective of healthcare professionals. The multifaceted findings emphasise involving stakeholders like clinical leaders, policymakers and decision-makers to address medication safety factors. A robust action plan, continuously monitored under Qatar's national strategy, is vital. Further research is needed to implement recommended interventions.

Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals on Clinician-Patient Communication of Cardiovascular Disease Risk.

When the consultation is predominantly verbal, existing research in clinician-patient communication indicates that many patients struggle to understand and recall medical consultations or may not understand the extent of their illness or the purpose of their treatment plan. When the clinician-patient discussion centers around the risk of a repeated cardiovascular disease (CVD) related event, qualitatively assessing what factors affect the communication of this risk may guide the creation of effective communication solutions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 clinicians treating patients at stages along the cardiac rehabilitation patients' journey. Thematic analysis identified factors that prevent patients from understanding the risk they face of experiencing a repeated cardiac event. Results indicate a clearer understanding of the cardiac rehabilitation patient journey by means of a patient journey map; an overview of how CVD risk is currently communicated; and the factors that affect communication of these risks in the form of themes and sub-themes. Findings shape the proposal of an evidence informed model of opportunities for enhanced digital media supported communication in cardiac rehabilitation.