Health Agencies Research Articles

Use of Digital Tools in Arbovirus Surveillance: Scoping Review.

The development of technology and information systems has led to important changes in public health surveillance. This scoping review aimed to assess the available evidence and gather information about the use of digital tools for arbovirus (dengue virus [DENV], zika virus [ZIKV], and chikungunya virus [CHIKV]) surveillance. The databases used were MEDLINE, SCIELO, LILACS, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and EMBASE. The inclusion criterion was defined as studies that described the use of digital tools in arbovirus surveillance. The exclusion criteria were defined as follows: letters, editorials, reviews, case reports, series of cases, descriptive epidemiological studies, laboratory and vaccine studies, economic evaluation studies, and studies that did not clearly describe the use of digital tools in surveillance. Results were evaluated in the following steps: monitoring of outbreaks or epidemics, tracking of cases, identification of rumors, decision-making by health agencies, communication (cases and bulletins), and dissemination of information to society). Of the 2227 studies retrieved based on screening by title, abstract, and full-text reading, 68 (3%) studies were included. The most frequent digital tools used in arbovirus surveillance were apps (n=24, 35%) and Twitter, currently called X (n=22, 32%). These were mostly used to support the traditional surveillance system, strengthening aspects such as information timeliness, acceptability, flexibility, monitoring of outbreaks or epidemics, detection and tracking of cases, and simplicity. The use of apps to disseminate information to society (P=.02), communicate (cases and bulletins; P=.01), and simplicity (P=.03) and the use of Twitter to identify rumors (P=.008) were statistically relevant in evaluating scores. This scoping review had some limitations related to the choice of DENV, ZIKV, and CHIKV as arboviruses, due to their clinical and epidemiological importance. In the contemporary scenario, it is no longer possible to ignore the use of web data or social media as a complementary strategy to health surveillance. However, it is important that efforts be combined to develop new methods that can ensure the quality of information and the adoption of systematic measures to maintain the integrity and reliability of digital tools' data, considering ethical aspects.

Thinking politically about intersectoral action: Ideas, Interests and Institutions shaping political dimensions of governing during COVID-19.

Our paper examines the political considerations in the intersectoral action that was evident during the SAR-COV-2 virus (COVID-19) pandemic through case studies of political and institutional responses in 16 nations (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, New Zealand, Nigeria, Peru, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, UK, and USA). Our qualitative case study approach involved an iterative process of data gathering and interpretation through the three Is (institutions, ideas and interests) lens, which we used to shape our understanding of political and intersectoral factors affecting pandemic responses. The institutional factors examined were: national economic and political context; influence of the global economic order; structural inequities; and public health structures and legislation, including intersectoral action. The ideas explored were: orientation of governments; political actors' views on science; willingness to challenge neoliberal policies; previous pandemic experiences. We examined the interests of political leaders and civil society and the extent of public trust. We derived five elements that predict effective and equity-sensitive political responses to a pandemic. Firstly, effective responses have to be intersectoral and led from the head of government with technical support from health agencies. Secondly, we found that political leaders' willingness to accept science, communicate empathetically and avoid 'othering' population groups was vital. The lack of political will was found in those countries stressing individualistic values. Thirdly, a supportive civil society which questions governments about excessive infringement of human rights without adopting populist anti-science views, and is free to express opposition to the government encourages effective political action in the interests of the population. Fourthly, citizen trust is vital in times of uncertainty and fear. Fifthly, evidence of consideration is needed regarding when people's health must be prioritized over the needs of the economy. All these factors are unlikely to be present in any one country. Recognizing the political aspects of pandemic preparedness is vital for effective responses to future pandemics and while intersectoral action is vital, it is not enough in isolation to improve pandemic outcomes.

Climate and health: a path to strategic co-financing?

Leveraging the co-benefits of investments in health and climate can be best achieved by moving away from isolated financing approaches and adopting co-financing strategies, which aim to improve the outcomes of both sectors. We propose a framework for studying co-financing for health and climate that considers the degree of integration between sector funding, and whether arrangements are 'passive', when cross-sectoral goals are indirectly affected, or 'strategic', when they are pre-emptively supported to build resilience and sustainability. We conducted a rigorous, evidence-focused review to describe co-financing mechanisms according to a framework, including the context in which they have been employed, and to identify enablers and barriers to implementation. We searched the international literature using Pubmed and Web of Science from 2013 to 2023, the websites of key health and climate agencies for grey literature and consulted with stakeholders. Our review underscores the significant impact of climate change and related hazards on government, health insurance and household health-related costs. Current evidence primarily addresses passive co-financing, reflecting the financial consequences of inaction. Strategic co-financing is under explored, as are integrative co-financing models demanding cross-sectoral coordination. Current instances of strategic co-financing lack sufficient funding to demonstrate their effectiveness. Climate finance, an under used resource for health, holds potential to generate additional revenue for health. Realizing these advantages necessitates co-benefit monitoring to align health, climate mitigation and adaptation goals, alongside stronger advocacy for the economic and environmental benefits of health investments. Strategic co-financing arrangements are vital at all system levels, demanding increased cross-sectoral collaboration, additional funding and skills for climate integration within health sector plans and budgets, and mainstreaming health into climate adaptation and mitigation plans. Supporting persistent health needs post-disasters, promoting adaptive social protection for health and climate risks, and disseminating best practices within and among countries are crucial, supported by robust evaluations to enhance progress.

Public Health Data Exchange Through Health Information Exchange Organizations: National Survey Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed major gaps in public health agencies' (PHAs') data and reporting infrastructure, which limited the ability of public health officials to conduct disease surveillance, particularly among racial or ethnic minorities disproportionally affected by the pandemic. Leveraging existing health information exchange organizations (HIOs) is one possible mechanism to close these technical gaps, as HIOs facilitate health information sharing across organizational boundaries. The aim of the study is to survey all HIOs that are currently operational in the United States to assess HIO connectivity with PHAs and HIOs' capabilities to support public health data exchange. Drawing on multiple sources, we identified all potential local, regional, and state HIOs that were operational in the United States as of March 1, 2022. We defined operational as HIOs that facilitated exchange between at least 2 independent entities. We fielded a survey among our census list of 135 HIOs in January-July 2023. The survey confirmed HIO status as well as captured organizational demographics and current and potential support for PHAs. We report descriptive statistics on HIO demographics and connectivity with PHAs. We also include results on services and data available to support PHAs, funding sources to support public health reporting, and barriers to public health reporting. Of the 135 potential HIOs that received the survey, 90 met our definition of an HIO, and 77 completed the survey, yielding an 86% response rate. We found that 66 (86%) of HIOs in 45 states were electronically connected to at least 1 PHA, yielding 187 HIO-PHA connections across all HIOs. Among HIOs connected to PHAs, the most common type of public health reporting supported by HIOs was immunization registry (n=39, 64%), electronic laboratory result (n=37, 63%), and syndromic surveillance (n=34, 61%). In total, 58% (n=38) of HIOs connected to PHAs provided data to address COVID-19 information gaps, and an additional 30% (n=20) could do so. The most common types of data provided to PHAs were hospitalization information (n=54, 93%), other demographic data (n=53, 91%), health information (eg, chronic health conditions; n=51, 88%), and hospital laboratory results (n=51, 88%). A total of 64% (n=42) of HIOs provided at least 1 type of data analytic service to PHAs to support COVID-19 pandemic response efforts. Top HIO reported barriers to support PHA activities included limited PHA funding (n=21, 32%) and PHAs' competing priorities (n=15, 23%). Our results show that many HIOs are already connected to PHAs and that they are assuming an emerging role to facilitate public health reporting. HIOs are well-positioned to provide value-added support for public health data exchange and address PHAs' information gaps, as ongoing federal efforts to modernize public health data infrastructure and interoperability continue.

Enhancing Adaptability: Exploring Structural Empowerment and Systems Thinking Among State Governmental Public Health Nutritionists.

This study explored how structural empowerment and systems thinking enabled public health nutritionists to adapt to complex environments. Interviews with 14 dietitian-prepared nutritionists from state governmental public health agencies elucidated 3 key themes: leveraging relationships was essential to exercising structural empowerment and systems thinking; accessing resources and support were priorities in supporting public health nutrition initiatives; and addressing gaps in formal training, specific to systems thinking, enabled adaptability to work in public health settings. The findings highlight the need for broader examinations into strengthening access to organizational power structures; integrating systems thinking into public health operations; and sustaining professional development for the public health workforce, especially with limited resources. Enhancing access to organizational power structures and applying systems thinking can empower the public health workforce to better adapt to challenges by building relationships, accessing resources and support, and making informed decisions that positively impact population health.

Evaluating the implementation of the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA) gateway for the Basic Healthcare Provision Fund (BHCPF) across six Northern states in Nigeria

BackgroundThis evaluation research utilized both qualitative and quantitative methods to assess the implementation of the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA) gateway of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF) across six states in Northern Nigeria: Bauchi, Borno, Kaduna, Kano, Sokoto, and Yobe.MethodsThis was a mixed-method research that utilized longitudinal surveys and Key informant interviews to gather information about the implementation status of the BHCPF-NPHCDA gateway. Checklists were developed based on the BHCPF’s national guidelines to gather quantitative data, while simple open-ended questionnaires were used to collect qualitative data from the state BHCPF Program Implementation Unit (PIU) focal persons as key informants.ResultsThe result revealed that the NPHCDA had accredited these six states to use one Primary Health Care (PHC) facility in each political ward to implement the BHCPF. Factors that contributed to the success achieved in some states included the early completion of contingent start-up activities, well-established coordination structures, strong support from partners, and the availability of established financial management systems. However, the delays in the submission of quarterly business plans by the BHCPF facilities affected timely approval and fund disbursement. Other challenges included staff capacity gaps, inadequate human resources, and poor management and supervision from the state health agency teams.ConclusionThere was suboptimal implementation of the BHCPF in at least one thematic area across all states. Therefore, actions such as government commitment for improved coordination, continuous capacity building, effective monitoring and evaluation, and targeted supportive supervision using innovative approaches should be undertaken to improve the program’s implementation. In a broader setting, the insights from BHCPF implementation are valuable for LMICs, offering guidance on overcoming implementation challenges associated with PHC financing. This research provides a resource for enhancing healthcare financing strategies in similar contexts.

Why Systems and Strategic Thinking Matter to Public Health Agencies

Why Systems and Strategic Thinking Matter to Public Health Agencies

Policy impact of the Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team: global perspective and United Kingdom case study

BackgroundMathematical models and advanced analytics play an important role in policy decision making and mobilizing action. The Imperial College Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Response Team (ICCRT) provided continuous, timely and robust epidemiological analyses to inform the policy responses of governments and public health agencies around the world. This study aims to quantify the policy impact of ICCRT outputs, and understand which evidence was considered policy-relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe collated all outputs published by the ICCRT between 01-01-2020 and 24-02-2022 and conducted inductive thematic analysis. A systematic search of the Overton database identified policy document references, as an indicator of policy impact.ResultsWe identified 620 outputs including preprints (16%), reports (29%), journal articles (37%) and news items (18%). More than half (56%) of all reports and preprints were subsequently peer-reviewed and published as a journal article after 202 days on average. Reports and preprints were crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic to the timely distribution of important research findings. One-fifth of ICCRT outputs (21%) were available to or considered by United Kingdom government meetings. Policy documents from 41 countries in 26 different languages referenced 43% of ICCRT outputs, with a mean time between publication and reference in the policy document of 256 days. We analysed a total of 1746 policy document references. Two-thirds (61%) of journal articles, 39% of preprints, 31% of reports and 16% of news items were referenced in one or more policy documents (these 217 outputs had a mean of 8 policy document references per output). The most frequent themes of the evidence produced by the ICCRT reflected the evidence-need for policy decision making, and evolved accordingly from the pre-vaccination phase [severity, healthcare demand and capacity, and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs)] to the vaccination phase of the epidemic (variants and genomics).ConclusionThe work produced by the ICCRT affected global and domestic policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. The focus of evidence produced by the ICCRT corresponded with changing policy needs over time. The policy impact from ICCRT news items highlights the effectiveness of this unique communication strategy in addition to traditional research outputs, ensuring research informs policy decisions more effectively.

Molecular docking and antibacterial and antibiotic-modifying activities of synthetic chalcone (2E)-1-(3'-aminophenyl)-3-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-prop-2-en-1-one in a MepA efflux pump-expressing Staphylococcus aureus strain.

Bacterial resistance has become a global concern for public health agencies. Various resistance mechanisms found in Staphylococcus aureus strains grant this bacterium resistance to a wide range of antibiotics, contributing to the rise in human mortality worldwide. Resistance mediated by efflux pumps is one of the most prevalent mechanisms in multi-resistant bacteria, which has aroused the interest of several researchers in the search for possible efflux pump inhibitors. In view of the aforementioned considerations, it is important that new strategies, such as the synthesis of chalcones, be made available as a viable strategy in antimicrobial therapy. In this study, the synthesized chalcone (2E)-1-(3'-aminophenyl)-3-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-prop-2-en-1-one was tested for its antibacterial activity, focusing on antibiotic modification and the inhibition of the MepA efflux pump present in S. aureus strain K2068. The broth microdilution method, using microdilution plates, was employed in microbiological tests to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of the chalcone, antibiotics, and ethidium bromide. The results show that while the chalcone did not exhibit direct antibacterial activity, it synergistically enhanced the effects of ciprofloxacin and ethidium bromide, as evidenced by the reduction in MICs. In addition, computer simulations of molecular docking demonstrate that the tested chalcone acts on the same binding site as the efflux pump inhibitor chlorpromazine, interacting with essentially the same residues. These data suggest that the chalcone may act as a MepA inhibitor.

The optimal approach for retrieving systematic reviews was achieved when searching MEDLINE and Epistemonikos in addition to reference checking: a methodological validation study

BackgroundSystematic reviews (SRs) are used to inform clinical practice guidelines and healthcare decision making by synthesising the results of primary studies. Efficiently retrieving as many relevant SRs as possible is challenging with a minimum number of databases, as there is currently no guidance on how to do this optimally. In a previous study, we determined which individual databases contain the most SRs, and which combination of databases retrieved the most SRs. In this study, we aimed to validate those previous results by using a different, larger, and more recent set of SRs.MethodsWe obtained a set of 100 Overviews of Reviews that included a total of 2276 SRs. SR inclusion was assessed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Epistemonikos. The mean inclusion rates (% of included SRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each database individually, as well as for combinations of MEDLINE with each other database and reference checking. Features of SRs not identified by the best database combination were reviewed qualitatively.ResultsInclusion rates of SRs were similar in all three databases (mean inclusion rates in % with 95% confidence intervals: 94.3 [93.9–94.8] for MEDLINE, 94.4 [94.0-94.9] for Embase, and 94.4 [93.9–94.9] for Epistemonikos). Adding reference checking to MEDLINE increased the inclusion rate to 95.5 [95.1–96.0]. The best combination of two databases plus reference checking consisted of MEDLINE and Epistemonikos (98.1 [97.7–98.5]). Among the 44/2276 SRs not identified by this combination, 34 were published in journals from China, four were other journal publications, three were health agency reports, two were dissertations, and one was a preprint. When discounting the journal publications from China, the SR inclusion rate in the recommended combination (MEDLINE, Epistemonikos and reference checking) was even higher than in the previous study (99.6 vs. 99.2%).ConclusionsA combination of databases and reference checking was the best approach to searching for biomedical SRs. MEDLINE and Epistemonikos, complemented by checking the references of the included studies, was the most efficient and produced the highest recall. However, our results point to the presence of geographical bias, because some publications in journals from China were not identified.Study registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R5EAS (Open Science Framework).

Assessing the Safety, User Acceptability, Dissemination, and Reach of a Comprehensive Web-Based Resource on Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD Hub): Protocol for a Development and Usability Study.

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as methadone and buprenorphine, are the gold standard for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. Owing to various barriers, MOUD access and retention are low in the United States. The internet presents a digital solution to mitigate barriers, but a comprehensive and reliable resource is lacking. We present a user-friendly, web-based resource, the MOUD Hub, that provides reliable information on MOUD. This study aims to assess the safety, acceptability, feasibility of dissemination, and reach of the MOUD Hub using focus groups and advertising on 1 key search engine and 1 social media platform. This protocol describes the development of the MOUD Hub and the descriptive observational feasibility study that will be undertaken. The MOUD Hub uses motivational interviewing principles to guide users through the stages of change. The website provides evidence-based information from national health and substance use agencies, harm reduction organizations, and peer-reviewed literature. First, pilot focus groups with 10 graduate students who have lived experience with OUD will be conducted to provide feedback on safety concerns. Then, focus groups with 20-30 potential MOUD Hub users (eg, people with OUD with and without MOUD experience, friends and family, and health care providers) will be conducted to assess safety, acceptability, reach, and usability. Data will be analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The website will be advertised on Google and MOUD-specific Reddit forums to assess dissemination, reach, and user acceptability based on the total user volume, sociodemographic characteristics, pop-up survey responses, and 1-year engagement patterns. This information will be collected through Google Analytics. Potential differences between users from Google and Reddit will be assessed. The MOUD Hub will be launched in January 2025. Data collected from 5 focus groups (approximately 30-40 participants) will be used to improve the website before launching it. There is no target sample size for the second stage of the study as it aims to assess dissemination feasibility and reach. Data will be collected for a year, analyzed every 3 months, and used to improve the website. The MOUD Hub offers an innovative theory-based approach, tailored to people with OUD and their family and friends, to increase access to and retention in MOUD treatment in the United States and provides broader harm reduction resources for those not currently in a position to receive treatment or those at risk of resuming illicit opioid use. Findings from this feasibility phase will serve to better tailor the MOUD Hub. After modifying the website based on our findings, we will use a randomized controlled trial to assess its efficacy in increasing MOUD access and retention, contributing to growing research on web-based interventions for OUD. PRR1-10.2196/57065.

Optimizing ambulance nurse performance in southern Tuscany: insights from a Delphi study

This study aims to enhance the performance of ambulance nurses in Southern Tuscany through a Delphi method analysis. Conducted from January to December 2022, the research engaged 16 expert participants from a Tuscan health agency. Data on 89 interventions performed by "India" ambulances, which are nurse-led emergency vehicles, were collected. The Delphi method facilitated structured communication among the experts over three rounds, resulting in consensus on nine key intervention proposals. These proposals span areas including staff training, measurement and data collection methods, technologies and materials, and work environments. Key recommendations include prioritizing high-fidelity simulation training, improving data collection for clinical risk, and standardizing equipment across all emergency units. The study highlights the importance of continuous professional development, technological integration, and supportive work environments to optimize the effectiveness of pre-hospital emergency care. These findings provide a practical roadmap for enhancing the competencies and performance of ambulance nurses, ultimately improving patient outcomes in emergency situations.

Flemish consensus statement on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in older nursing home residents.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most commonly reported infections in Belgian nursing home residents. In older adults, UTI diagnosis and management is complex, often leading to over-diagnosis and irrational antimicrobial use, stressing the need for a guideline approach. A consensus statement on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of UTIs in older adults residing in nursing homes was developed in a collaborative effort between the Flemish Hospital Outbreak Support Teams, the Flemish Agency for Care and Health, the Association of the Flemish Coordinating and Advising General Practitioners, the Belgian Association of Urology, the Belgian Society for Gerontology and Geriatrics and PhD researchers based on a combination of clinical expertise, (inter)national guidelines and peer-reviewed studies. Optimizing fluid intake, appropriate toilet behaviour and posture, mobilization and local estrogen therapy in women are of proven value in UTI prevention, whereas the use of cranberry and probiotics is not to be advocated. The importance of avoiding bladder catheterization is stressed. In older nursing home residents, the diagnosis of UTIs remains challenging, mostly due to atypical systemic symptoms. A consensus diagnostic algorithm for UTI among residents with and without a urinary catheter was developed, including the presence of suggestive clinical symptoms and a positive urine culture. Urine dipsticks have a high negative but a low positive predictive value. C-reactive protein point-of-care testing is not recommended. Asymptomatic bacteriuria should not be screened for, in order to avoid unnecessary triggers for treatment. In cystitis, nitrofurantoin is the primary choice for treatment, with fosfomycin as an alternative; in prostatitis and uncomplicated pyelonephritis a fluoroquinolone is the advocated empirical antimicrobial.

Genomic perspectives on foodborne illness

Whole-genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens is used by public health agencies to link cases of food poisoning caused by the same source of contamination. The vast majority of these appear to be sporadic cases associated with small contamination episodes and do not trigger investigations. A "contamination episode" refers to one or more contamination events from a single source over a period of time. We examine clusters of sequenced clinical isolates of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, and Listeria that differ by only a small number of mutations (SNPs) to identify features of the underlying contamination episodes. These analyses provide additional evidence that the youngest age groups have greater susceptibility to infection by Salmonella, E. coli, and Campylobacter than older age groups. This age bias is weaker for the common Salmonella serovar Enteritidis than Salmonella in general. A large fraction of the contamination episodes causing sickness appear to have a long duration. For example, 50% of the Salmonella cases are in clusters that persist for almost 3 y. For all four pathogen species, the majority of the cases were part of genetic clusters with illnesses in multiple states and likely to be caused by contaminated commercially distributed foods. Salmonella infections in infants under 3 mo are predominantly acquired from the same contaminated food, pet food, or environmental sources as older individuals, rather than infant formula contaminated during production.

The CHALO! 2.0 mHealth-Based Multilevel Intervention to Promote HIV Testing and Linkage-to-Care Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Mumbai, India: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Current programs to engage marginalized populations such as gay and bisexual individuals and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in HIV prevention interventions do not often reach all MSM who may benefit from them. To reduce the global burden of HIV, far-reaching strategies are needed to engage MSM in HIV prevention and treatment. Globally, including low- and middle-income countries, MSM are now widely using internet-based social and mobile technologies (SMTs; eg, dating apps, social media, and WhatsApp [Meta]), which provides an unprecedented opportunity to engage unreached and underserved groups, such as MSM for HIV prevention and care. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a multilevel mobile health (mHealth)-based intervention to improve HIV testing uptake and status neutral linkage-to-care among sexually active MSM reached through internet-based platforms in Mumbai, India. In this randomized controlled trial, we will determine whether CHALO! 2.0 (a theory-based multilevel intervention delivered in part through WhatsApp) results in increased HIV testing and linkage-to-care (prevention or treatment). This study is being conducted among 1000 sexually active MSM who are unaware of their HIV status (never tested or tested >6 months ago) and are recruited through SMTs in Mumbai, India. We will conduct a 12-week, 3-arm randomized trial comparing CHALO! 2.0 to 2 control conditions-an attention-matched SMT-based control (also including a digital coupon for free HIV testing) and a digital coupon-only control. The primary outcomes will be HIV testing and status neutral linkage-to-care by 6 months post enrollment. Participants will be followed up for a total of 18 months to evaluate the long-term impact. The study was funded in 2020, with recruitment having started in April 2022 due to delays from the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline survey data collection began in April 2022, with follow-up surveys starting in July 2022. As of April 2022, we enrolled 1004 participants in the study. The completion of follow-up data collection is expected in January 2025, with results to be published thereafter. While global health agencies have called for internet-based interventions to engage populations vulnerable to HIV who are not being reached, few proven effective and scalable models exist and none is in India, which has one of the world's largest HIV epidemics. This study will address this gap by testing a multicomponent mHealth intervention to reach and engage MSM at high priority for HIV interventions and link them to HIV testing and prevention or treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04814654; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04814654. Clinical Trial Registry of India CTRI/2021/03/032280. DERR1-10.2196/59873.

Nurses Experience of Being a Nursepreneur in Independent Nursing Practice

Nurses have the authority to open an independent nursing practice as one of the health services Nursepreneur is a business built based on the field of nursing the high number of nurses and the lack of independent nursing practice land into a phenomenon why nurses do not build a business in the field of nursing. Descriptive qualitative research method, sampling technique used purposive sampling and snowball sampling, with the number of informants three nurses who open nursing independent practice instrument used semi-structured interviews with data validity triangulation method and data analysis obtained five main themes. The results showed that the type of nursing independent practice established was wound care practice with a group wound care practice model, the strategic stage of establishing nursing independent practice by analyzing patient characteristics and analyzing the work environment and the regional environment, the obstacles are in the licensing flow in opening a nursing independent practice land that has not been structured and takes a long time and opportunities in mendiri nursing independent practice by branding between health agencies and through social media. Suggestions in this study need to develop quality standards for services to establish independent nursing practices and increase the involvement of professional organizations in fostering nurses who want to open independent nursing practices.

Lyme borreliosis in Brazil: a critical review on the Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome (Brazilian Lyme-like disease).

SUMMARYLyme borreliosis or Lyme disease is the most frequently reported tick-borne disease in the Northern Hemisphere. In countries of the Southern Hemisphere, such as Brazil, since the early 1990s, some researchers have argued for the existence of an autochthonous Lyme-like borreliosis, known locally as the Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome (BYS), an alleged "Brazilian borreliosis" supposedly caused by a different strain of Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted by hard ticks. Currently, the existence of BYS in Brazil is still accepted by a large part of the human health care workers, scientists, medical societies, and patients. In fact, this alleged "Brazilian borreliosis" has been the tick-borne zoonotic disease with the greatest number of reported cases and published studies in Brazil during this century, second only to Brazilian spotted fever. In this manuscript, we reviewed all manuscripts directly related to BYS that have been published in Brazil during the last 35 years. This analysis included 199 individual human cases that have been reported in Brazil since 1989, plus multiple studies on ticks, domestic, and wild animals. Our revision aimed to provide a critical opinion on whether the current published works allow healthcare workers, public health agencies, and patients to accept the existence of Lyme disease, BYS, or other Lyme borreliosis-related disease in Brazil. For this purpose, we evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each published study, considering the diagnostic methods used, such as serological, microbiological, and molecular analyses. Based on these evaluations, we conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the occurrence of Lyme borreliosis in Brazil or that BYS (Brazilian Lyme-like disease) is caused by a bacterium of the genus Borrelia. This assumption is based on the inaccuracy, unreliability, and misinterpretation of the different diagnostic methods that have been used in Brazil. Recognizing the lack of technical evidence for the occurrence of Lyme borreliosis in Brazil has highly relevant implications. For example, it becomes imperative to raise awareness among the country's medical profession, as they have adopted unnecessary and extreme therapies recommended for patients with a supposed borrelial infection, including BYS, in Brazil. Finally, the technical analyses carried out in this study could be applied to other countries in the Southern Hemisphere (e.g., Argentina, South Africa, Australia), where cases classified and alleged as Lyme disease have been reported.

Should We Use Clinician Self-Report to Tailor Implementation Strategies? Predicting Use of Youth CBT with Clinician Self-Report Versus Direct Observation.

Developing tailored implementation strategies to increase the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) requires accurate identification of predictors of their use. However, known difficulties with measuring EBP use complicates interpretation of the extant literature. In this proof-of-concept study, we examined whether the same predictors of use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are identified when CBT use is measured with clinician self-report compared to direct observation. We examined four candidate predictors of CBT use - clinician participation in an EBP training initiative, years of experience, caseload, and employment status - in a sample of 36 clinicians (64% female; 72% White and 28% Black) from 19 community mental health agencies treating youth in greater Philadelphia. CBT use was captured for 100 unique client sessions (M = 2.8 recorded sessions per clinician) through both clinician self-report and direct observation, using parallel measures. We used three-level (client, clinician, and agency) regression models with random intercepts to estimate the relationship between each predictor variable and CBT use in both measures and compared the magnitude and direction of each model across self-report and direct observation using z-tests. There was no alignment for any of the four candidate predictors between predictive relationships identified by self-report compared to those identified by direct observation. The findings in this study extend literature documenting limitations of using clinician self-report to capture clinician behavior and suggest that even the characteristics that predict higher self-reported CBT use do not align with (and often are discordant with) those that predict directly observed CBT use. This raises questions about the utility of relying on self-reported use to inform implementation strategy design.

Predicting the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 on Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States

The introduction of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19 disrupted circulation of many respiratory pathogens and eventually caused large, delayed outbreaks, owing to the build up of the susceptible pool during the intervention period. In contrast to other common respiratory pathogens that re-emerged soon after the NPIs were lifted, longer delays (> 3 years) in the outbreaks of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp), a bacterium commonly responsible for respiratory infections and pneumonia, have been reported in Europe and Asia. As Mp cases are continuing to increase in the US, predicting the size of an imminent outbreak is timely for public health agencies and decision makers. Here, we use simple mathematical models to provide robust predictions about a large Mp outbreak ongoing in the US. Our model further illustrates that NPIs and waning immunity are important factors in driving long delays in epidemic resurgence.

Change of Ownership and Quality of Home Health Agency Care

The home health agency (HHA) market has seen increasingly more change in ownership transactions. Little is known about the organizational characteristics and quality of care of HHAs after ownership has changed. To examine whether an HHA change in ownership was associated with different quality-of-care outcomes, patient volume, and staffing levels. Using current HHA change of ownership files linked to publicly available Medicare HHA data, this staggered difference-in-differences analysis evaluated ownership change transactions of Medicare-certified HHAs from quarter 1 of 2016 to quarter 4 of 2019. Pretransaction and posttransaction HHA characteristics and quality-of-care outcomes were compared between HHAs that changed ownership and up to 8 matched controls. The transactions in the main analysis included (1) when an HHA remained as for-profit with a change in ownership and (2) when an HHA changed from nonprofit/public to for-profit ownership. The data were analyzed between November 2023 and September 2024. The primary outcomes were HHA-quarter measures of star ratings, the individual quality measures that compose the star ratings based on the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, and claims-based quality metrics, such as hospitalizations and emergency department visits. The secondary outcomes included HHA year measures of Medicare patient volume, per capita payments, and staffing levels (full-time equivalents and minutes per visit). The main dataset included 294 Medicare-certified HHAs that changed ownership, matched with 2330 controls. In 3 years after an ownership change, quarterly star ratings increased by 0.18 (95% CI, 0.05-0.31) relative to matched controls, with greater increases among HHAs that converted from nonprofit/public to for-profit. No significant improvement was observed in the 60-day rates of hospital admissions or outpatient emergency department visits. Further, no significant changes were observed in the number of Medicare beneficiaries, but per capita payments increased within 2 years post-ownership change. Significant reductions were observed in full-time equivalents of registered nurses (-17% [95% CI, -31% to -3%]) and home health aides (-26% [95% CI, -39% to -13%]), as well as per-visit minutes for skilled nursing care (-5% [95% CI, -9% to -1%]), physical therapy (-3% [95% CI, -5% to 0%]), and home health aide care (-11% [95% CI, -15% to -6%]). In this difference-in-differences analysis of Medicare-certified HHAs, ownership change was associated with higher star ratings and Medicare per capita payments, but not with claims-based quality measures. Reduction in staffing levels after ownership change raises concerns about implications for quality of care.