HBcrAg Levels Research Articles

Evaluation of HBV serological markers in treatment-naïve HBV mono-infected patients and HBV-HIV co-infected patients

ObjectivesMany studies have investigated the utility of hepatitis B virus (HBV) serological markers in HBV-infected patients. However, only a few studies have examined HBV serological markers in HBV-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients. Here, we conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate correlations of HBV serological markers in treatment-naïve HBV mono-infected patients and HBV-HIV co-infected patients. MethodsHBsAg, HBV DNA, HBV RNA, and HBcrAg were quantified in 51 HBV mono-infected patients and 33 HBV-HIV co-infected patients recruited at Tianjin Second People’s Hospital from 2016 to 2019. ResultsThere was no significant difference in serum levels of HBV DNA (P = 0.056), HBV RNA (P = 0.387), HBcrAg (P = 0.714) and HBsAg (P = 0.165) between the patient groups. In HBV mono-infected patients, strong positive correlations were confirmed between HBV RNA and HBV DNA (r=0.620, P < 0.01), HBcrAg and HBV DNA (r=0.802, P < 0.001), and HBcrAg and HBV RNA (r=0.727, P < 0.01). In HBV-HIV co-infected patients, serum HBsAg was very strongly correlated with HBcrAg (r=0.838, P < 0.001). In HBeAg-positive HBV mono-infected patients, all HBV serological markers correlated with each other, whereas only HBV RNA correlated with HBcrAg in HBeAg-negative HBV mono-infected patients (r=0.688, P = 0.007). In HBeAg-positive HBV-HIV co-infected patients, only HBsAg correlated with HBcrAg (r=0.725, P<0.001), whereas HBcrAg and HBV RNA correlated with each other in HBeAg-negative patients (r = 0.683, P=0.010). Moreover, CD4 T-cell counts were not significantly associated with HBsAg, HBV DNA, HBV RNA, and HBcrAg levels. ConclusionCompared with HBsAg and HBV DNA, which are widely used in clinical settings, our study confirmed that new HBV serological markers, such as HBV RNA and HBcrAg, have some utility in HBV mono-infected patients and HBV-HIV co-infected patients for monitoring the progression of liver disease.

SAT444 - Low HBcrAg and HBsAg levels identify patients most likely to achieve sustained response after nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation: results from a global individual patient data meta-analysis (create study)

SAT444 - Low HBcrAg and HBsAg levels identify patients most likely to achieve sustained response after nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation: results from a global individual patient data meta-analysis (create study)

Pilot study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and pegylated interferon-alpha 2a add-on therapy in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B.

A prospective pilot study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and pegylated interferon alpha 2a (P-IFN) add-on therapy was conducted to evaluate its efficacy in reducing viral antigen levels in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B (UMIN 000020179). Patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving maintenance TDF therapy and exhibiting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level > 800IU/ml were divided into two arms. P-IFN was added for 48weeks in the add-on arm (n = 32), while TDF monotherapy was maintained in the control arm (n = 51). Both groups were followed for 96weeks after baseline measurements. Almost all patients in the control arm displayed a slow and constant reduction in HBsAg during follow-up. In contrast, roughly half of the add-on arm exhibited a sharp decline in HBsAg during P-IFN administration, which disappeared after halting P-IFN. At 96weeks after baseline, 41% (13/32) of patients in the add-on arm had shown a rapid decrease in HBsAg, versus 2% (1/51) in the control arm (p < 0.001). Add-on therapy and increased cytotoxic T-cell response were significant factors associated with a rapid decrease in HBsAg according to multivariate analysis. In addition, higher HB core-related antigen (HBcrAg) level at baseline (p = 0.001) and add-on therapy (p = 0.036) were significant factors associated with a rapid reduction in HBcrAg. TDF and P-IFN add-on therapy in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B facilitated rapid decreases in HBsAg and HBcrAg. Further studies are needed to improve early HBsAg clearance rate.

Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen predicts hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a novel serum viral marker. Recent studies showed that its level correlates with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of serum HBsAg and HBcrAg levels at baseline to predict HCC. 1400 CHB patients who received nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) treatment since December 2005 were included. Their stored serum samples at baseline were retrieved to measure HBsAg and HBcrAg levels. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of HCC. 85 (6.1%) patients developed HCC during a mean (± SD) follow-up duration of 45 ± 20months. Serum HBcrAg level above 2.9 log10 U/mL at baseline was an independent factor for HCC in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients by multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.10-4.14, P = 0.025). HBcrAg above 2.9 log10 U/mL stratified the risk of HCC in HBeAg-negative patients with high PAGE-B score (P = 0.024 by Kaplan-Meier analysis), and possibly in cirrhotic patients (P = 0.08). Serum HBsAg level did not show any correlation with the risk of HCC in all patients or any subgroups. Serum HBcrAg level predicts the risk of HCC accurately in NA-treated HBeAg-negative CHB patients.

Novel biomarkers for the management of chronic hepatitis B.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) cannot be eliminated completely from infected hepatocytes because of the presence of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). As chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is important to manage CHB to prevent HCC development in high-risk patients with high viral replicative activity or advanced fibrosis. Serum biomarkers are noninvasive and valuable for the management of CHB. Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) correlates with serum HBV DNA and intrahepatic cccDNA. In CHB patients with undetectable serum HBV DNA or loss of HBsAg, HBcrAg still can be detected and the decrease in HBcrAg levels is significantly associated with hopeful outcomes. Therefore, HBcrAg can predict HCC occurrence or recurrence. Measurement of the Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) has been introduced for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Because elevated M2BPGi in CHB is related to liver fibrosis and the prediction of HCC development, monitoring its progression is essential. Because alpha fetoprotein (AFP) has insufficient sensitivity and specificity for early-stage HCC, a combination of AFP plus protein induced by vitamin K absence factor II, or AFP plus Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein might improve the diagnosis of HCC development. Additionally, Dickkopf-1 and circulating immunoglobulin G antibodies are the novel markers to diagnose HCC or assess HCC prognosis. This review provides an overview of novel HBV biomarkers used for the management of intrahepatic viral replicative activity, liver fibrosis, and HCC development.

Entecavir Reduced Serum Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) was shown to predict the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients undergoing treatment. We investigated the longitudinal profile of HBcrAg in entecavir (ETV)-treated CHB patients with subsequent HCC development. We identified HCC cases diagnosed at ≥1 year after ETV initiation. CHB patients without HCC (matched for age, sex, cirrhosis status, baseline hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA level, and ETV treatment duration) were identified as controls at an HCC:non-HCC ratio of 1:2. Serum samples were retrieved at baseline (ETV initiation) and at 3 and 5 years of ETV therapy for HBcrAg measurement (log IU/mL). In total, 180 patients (60 HCC patients matched with 120 CHB patients without HCC; median age, 56.5 years; 80.6% male; baseline HBV DNA, 5.9 log IU/mL; median follow-up, 6.8 years) were recruited. The median time from ETV initiation to HCC development was 3.2 years. HBcrAg levels were higher in HCC cases than in controls at all three time points: 5.69 log IU/mL versus 5.02 log IU/mL (p=0.025), 4.23 log IU/mL versus 3.36 log IU/mL (p=0.007), and 3.86 log IU/mL versus 3.36 log IU/mL (p=0.009), respectively. ETV led to similar rates of decline in HBcrAg from baseline to 3 years in both groups (0.34 log IU/mL/year vs 0.39 log IU/mL/year, p=0.774), although the decline from 3 to 5 years was slower in the non-HCC group (0.05 log IU/mL/year) than in the HCC group (0.09 log IU/mL/year, p=0.055). ETV time-dependently reduced HBcrAg in HCC and non-HCC patients. HBcrAg interpretation should consider the antiviral treatment duration.

Quantatitative assays for covalently closed circular DNA of hepatitis B virus

<p indent=0mm>Chronic infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is still one of the public health concerns affecting human health. Although the prophylactic HBV vaccines was introduced over three decades ago, the total number of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection still accounts for 3.5% (257 million) of the world’s population, with approximately 800000 annual deaths related to the viral infection. Currently, drugs including PEG-IFN and NAs are widely used in the treatment of HBV infection with certain degree of success. It is still difficult to achieve a high proportion of “clinical cure” with existing treatment methods. The presence of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the infected hepatocytes is the underlying mechanism for the long-term HBV persistence and is also essential for off-therapy viral relapse. The current treatments have no or limited effects on the suppression of intrahepatic cccDNA. The availability for a reliable cccDNA quantification assay would facilitate the developmentof anti-viral drugs targeting cccDNA-targeting. In this review, we summarized the advantages and disadvantages of the existing methods for cccDNA quantitation. Specifically, the extraction method of Hirt DNA combined with Exonuclease V can effectively remove other forms of HBV DNA, and suitable for cccDNA extraction, but it needs to be further optimized. Southern blot is considered as the “gold-standard” method for cccDNA detection, but it is less sensitive and requires cumbersome procedures, making it an unlikely method for high-throughput screening used for drug development or for clinical applications. The PCR-based methods are more convenient and sensitive for cccDNA detection. However, the reliability of PCR-based method requires further optimization and validation. Different PCR-based methods were developed for quantitation of HBV cccDNA. They include selective qPCR, droplet-digital PCR, rolling circle amplification PCR,<italic> in situ</italic> PCR, invader assay, magnetic capture hybridization qPCR, etc. These PCR-based methods are widely used in clinical and laboratory research for quantitation of cccDNA. Efforts need to be made to minimize the interference from other forms of DNAs in the assays. More recently, hepatitis B core related antigen (HBcrAg)was found to be a novel marker of HBV, and its level in serum is highly correlated with intracellular cccDNA level. This biomarker, the HBcrAg level, can be used to indicate the suppression of cccDNA during different clinical antiviral therapies. The correlation needs further analysis with additional data sets. In summary, we present a review on the quantitation assays for HBV cccDNA. Such assays are important for drug developments and clinical applications for improved management of HBV infection related diseases. Performance and characteristics of various methods were compared with the areas of improvements for different assays.

Rebound of HBV DNA after cessation of nucleos/tide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients with undetectable covalently closed.

Background & AimsNucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) effectively suppress serum HBV DNA. Previously, we have identified 21 patients with undetectable covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) upon long-term NUC therapy. This study investigated the effect of NUC withdrawal in patients with undetectable cccDNA.MethodsNineteen patients on long term NUCs (median 13.4 years) were recruited: 13 were randomized to discontinue NUCs; 6 to continue taking NUCs. All had undetectable cccDNA at the time of last liver biopsy (median time 2.9 years prior to randomization). Serum HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), liver biochemistry, and serum HBV RNA were monitored.ResultsAt the time of randomization, all patients had undetectable serum HBV DNA and HBV RNA. Twelve of the 13 patients had HBV DNA rebound to 100 IU/ml within 20 weeks of NUC discontinuation. The thirteenth patient had HBV DNA rebound at week 70. Three patients experienced biochemical flares after re-treatment which subsequently resolved. There was no significant association between the time of HBV DNA rebound and baseline HBsAg, HBcrAg and alanine aminotransferase, duration of treatment, and age at which treatment was stopped (all p >0.05). At the time of HBV DNA rebound, HBV DNA levels correlated with HBcrAg levels (p = 0.003), but not with HBsAg levels (p = 0.262).ConclusionsIn patients with undetectable intrahepatic cccDNA, virologic rebound still occurred after NUC cessation. At the rebound of HBV DNA, the kinetics of HBsAg production were independent of those of viral DNA replication. Additional studies are required to determine the factors that may predict virologic rebound and when NUCs can be discontinued in HBsAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B.Lay summaryIt has been shown that following long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment for chronic hepatitis B, some patients have undetectable levels of viral DNA in their livers. We tested the results of withdrawing nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment in these patients and found that viral relapse could occur in patients with undetectable viral DNA. Further research is required to determine whether nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment can be discontinued in specific patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen loss, relapse and retreatment after discontinuation of effective oral antiviral therapy in noncirrhotic HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

Reliable predictors of outcomes after treatment discontinuation in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients have not been established. We investigated the role of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP10) and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) serum levels as predictors of HBsAg loss, relapse and retreatment in noncirrhotic HBeAg-negative CHB patients who discontinued long-term antiviral therapy. All HBsAg-positive (n=57) patients of the prospective DARING-B study were included and followed monthly for 3months, every 2/3months until month-12 and every 3/6months thereafter. HBsAg, IP10 and HBcrAg levels were measured by enzyme immunoassays, and SCALE-B score was calculated. Twelve patients achieved HBsAg loss before retreatment with 18-month cumulative incidence of 25%. Independent predictors of HBsAg loss were baseline HBsAg and month-1 IP10 levels. Of 10 patients with baseline HBsAg ≤100IU/mL, 70% cleared HBsAg and 10% required retreatment. Of 23 patients with baseline HBsAg >1000IU/mL, 4% cleared HBsAg and 43% required retreatment. Of 24 patients with intermediate baseline HBsAg (100-1000IU/mL), 17% cleared HBsAg and 21% required retreatment; in this subgroup, month-1 IP10 was significantly associated with HBsAg loss, which occurred in 30% and 7% of cases with IP10 >150 and ≤150pg/mL, respectively. Baseline HBcrAg was undetectable in all patients who cleared HBsAg and was associated with retreatment. SCALE-B was associated with HBsAg loss but not with relapse or retreatment. In conclusion, HBsAg, IP10 and HBcrAg serum levels can be useful for the decisions and management of treatment discontinuation in noncirrhotic Caucasian patients with HBeAg-negative CHB.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen levels after HBeAg seroconversion is associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a novel serological marker for hepatitis B virus infection. Its clinical significance after HBeAg seroconversion has not been defined. We aimed to determine the relationship between HBcrAg levels after spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 207 chronic hepatitis B patients with documented time of HBeAg seroconversion were enrolled. HBcrAg and HBsAg were checked within 3years (as baseline), at 5 and 10years after HBeAg seroconversion. HBV DNA was measured at the baseline. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to investigate the predictors for HCC development. The median follow-up time was 13.1 (11.8-15.5) years. Fourteen patients developed HCC (15-year cumulative incidence: 7%). The median level of HBcrAg at baseline was significantly higher in patients who developed HCC when compared with patients without HCC (5.68 vs 4.78 log U/ml, respectively; P=.003). Cox proportional hazards model indicated that age of HBeAg seroconversion older than 40years (hazard ratio (HR): 4.60; P=.049), presence of baseline cirrhosis (HR: 6.23; P=.003) and a higher baseline HBcrAg (HR: 1.75; P=.032) were independently associated with HCC development. A cut-off value of baseline HBcrAg level ≥5.21 log U/mL yielded an AUROC of 0.74 with a negative predictive value of 97.7%. High HBcrAg levels within 3years after HBeAg seroconversion were independently associated with the development of HCC in chronic hepatitis B patients.

High Level of Hepatitis B Core–Related Antigen Associated With Increased Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection of Intermediate Viral Load

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Serum levels of HB core-related antigen (HBcrAg) have been associated with active replication of HBV. We investigated whether HBcrAg levels are associated with development of HCC, especially in patients who do not require antiviral treatment. We collected data from 2666 adults positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), infected with HBV genotypes B or C, and without liver cirrhosis, who had long-term follow-up at the National Taiwan University Hospital from 1985 through 2000. None of the patients received antiviral treatment during the follow-up. Baseline levels of HBV DNA, HBsAg, and HBcrAg were determined retrospectively and participants were followed for a mean of 15.95 years. The primary end point was an association between serum level of HBcrAg and HCC development. HCC developed in 209 patients in the cohort (incidence rate, 4.91 cases/1000 person-years). We found a positive association between baseline level of HBcrAg and HCC development; HBcrAg level was an independent risk factor in multivariable analysis. In the subgroup of hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients with HBV DNA levels from 2000 to 19,999 IU/mL (intermediate viral load [IVL]) and normal levels of alanine aminotransferase, HBcrAg levels of 10 KU/mL or more identified patients at increased risk of HCC (hazard ratio, 6.29; confidence interval, 2.27-17.48). Patients with an IVL and a high level of HBcrAg had a risk for HCC that did not differ significantly from that of patients with a high viral load (≥20,000 IU/mL). Patients with an IVL but a low level ofHBcrAg had a low risk of HCC, with an annual incidence rate of0.10% (95% confidence interval, 0.04%-0.24%). In a long-term follow-up study of 2666 patients with chronic HBV infection (genotypes B or C), level of HBcrAg is an independent risk factor of HCC. Moreover, HBcrAg level of 10 KU/mL identifies patients with an IVL who are at high risk for HCC.

Hepatitis B core‐related antigen monitoring during peginterferon alfa treatment for HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B

Serum Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) level moderately correlates with cccDNA. We examined whether HBcrAg can add value in monitoring the effect of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) therapy for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Thus, serum HBcrAg level was measured in 133 HBeAg-negative, mainly Caucasian CHB patients, treated with 48weeks of PEG-IFN alfa-2a. We assessed its association with response (ALT normalization & HBV DNA<2000IU/mL) at week 72. HBcrAg level strongly correlated with HBV DNA level (r=0.8, P<0.001) and weakly with qHBsAg and ALT (both r=0.2, P=0.01). At week 48, mean HBcrAg decline was -3.3 log U/mL. Baseline levels were comparable for patients with and without response at week 72 (5.0 vs 4.9 log U/mL, P=0.59). HBcrAg decline at week 72 differed between patients with and without response (-2.4 vs -1.0 log U/mL, P=0.001), but no cut-off could be determined. The pattern of decline in responders resembled that of HBV DNA, but HBcrAg decline was weaker (HBcrAg -2.5 log U/mL; HBV DNA: -4.0 log IU/mL, P<0.001). For early identification of nonresponse, diagnostic accuracy of HBV DNA and qHBsAg decline at week 12 (AUC 0.742, CI-95% [0.0.629-0.855], P<0.001) did not improve by adding HBcrAg decline (AUC 0.747, CI-95% [0.629-0.855] P<0.001), nor by replacing HBV DNA decline by HBcrAg decline (AUC 0.754, CI-95% [0.641-0.867], P<0.001). In conclusion, in Caucasian patients with HBeAg-negative CHB, decline of HBcrAg during PEG-IFN treatment was stronger in patients with treatment response. However, HBcrAg was not superior to HBV DNA and qHBsAg in predicting response during PEG-IFN treatment.

The role of hepatitis B core-related antigen in predicting hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a viral marker for the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the relationship between HBcrAg and HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is unclear. To investigate the correlation of serum HBcrAg level with HBV recurrence post-LT to evaluate the prognostic role of the pre-LT HBcrAg level. This retrospective cohort study enrolled 357 CHB patients who received LT for a median of 36.6months. Univariate and multivariate analyses and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for markers associated with HBV recurrence were analysed. 48 patients (13.4%) had HBV recurrence after LT. HBcrAg, detectable HBV DNA, HCC and HCC recurrence wereassociated with HBV recurrence. In a multivariate analysis, HBcrAg level was independently associated with HBV recurrence, and the relationship between HBcrAg level and incident HBV recurrence was significant and graded (HR: 3.17 per unit; 95% CI: 1.97-5.11; P for trend<.001). Additionally, HBcrAg level was superior to HBV DNA level in predicting HBV recurrence bytime-dependentROCanalysis. Patients with an HBcrAg≥5.0 logU/mL had a significantly higher 5-year cumulative recurrence rate than those with an HBcrAg<5.0 logU/mL (37.6% vs 6%, P<.001); the adjusted hazard ratio was 5.27 (95% CI 2.47-11.25, P<.001). An elevated serum HBcrAg level was independently associated with the risk of HBV recurrence in patients with CHB after LT.

The Role of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) cannot be completely eliminated from infected hepatocytes due to the existence of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). Serological biomarkers reflect intrahepatic viral replicative activity as non-invasive alternatives to liver biopsy. Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a novel biomarker that has an important role in chronic hepatitis B (CHB), because it correlates with serum HBV DNA and intrahepatic cccDNA. In clinical cases with undetectable serum HBV DNA or loss of HBsAg, HBcrAg still can be detected and the decrease in HBcrAg levels is significantly associated with promising outcomes for CHB patients. HBcrAg can predict spontaneous or treatment-induced hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, persistent responses before and after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogues, potential HBV reactivation, HBV reinfection after liver transplantation, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma progression or recurrence. In this review, the clinical applications of HBcrAg in CHB patients based on its virological features are described. Furthermore, new potential therapeutic anti-HBV agents that affect intrahepatic cccDNA are under development, and the monitoring of HBcrAg might be useful to judge therapeutic effects. In conclusion, HBcrAg might be a suitable surrogate marker beyond other HBV markers to predict the disease progression and treatment responses of CHB patients.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in heart transplant recipients with past HBV infection: A pilot study.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) has been proposed as a new marker of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. We analyzed HBcrAg dynamics in 15 heart transplant recipients with active or prior HBV infection and correlated it with quantitative (QT)-HBsAg and HBV-DNA pre- and post-transplant. Serum HBcrAg was detected in HBsAg/HBV-DNA-positive subjects but not in recipients with past HBV infection. HBcrAg levels correlated with QT-HBsAg in pre- and post-transplant samples. In prior HBV infection, HBcrAg levels were unrelated to HBV-DNA positivity. In heart transplant recipients with prior HBV infection, HBcrAg does not correlate with viral replication and cannot be applied to detect HBV reactivation during follow-up.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen levels predict pegylated interferon-α therapy response in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.

Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels reflect intrahepatic HBV replication activity. We aimed to study whether HBcrAg levels predict response to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. We studied HBcrAg levels in 222 HBeAg-positive patients treated with PEG-IFN with or without lamivudine for 52 weeks in a global randomized trial and compared kinetics across treatment arms and types of response. Optimal HBcrAg cutoffs for stopping therapy were compared to and combined with the currently recommended hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-based stopping-rules. Baseline HBcrAg levels could not discriminate between responders and non-responders (P=0.91). HBcrAg levels of patients responding to PEG-IFN therapy showed a more pronounced on-treatment decline (mean declines 3.4 versus 1.0 log U/ml; P<0.0001), which was sustained until the end of follow-up (mean declines week 78, 3.8 versus 1.0 log U/ml; P<0.0001). In the PEG-IFN monotherapy group, HBcrAg levels of >8.35 log U/ml at week 24 identified 19 patients (19%) of whom 1 (negative predicitve value [NPV]=95%) achieved a response. The performance of this HBcrAg-based stopping rule alone was not superior to the one based on HBsAg >20,000 IU/ml. Among patients with an HBsAg <20,000 (n=56), 9 (16%) had an HBcrAg >8.35, of whom 8 achieved no response (NPV 89%). HBeAg-positive CHB patients with a response to PEG-IFN therapy achieve a more pronounced HBcrAg decline. HBcrAg levels at week 24 of therapy could be used to identify non-responders in combination with the established HBsAg-based stopping-rules.

Relationship between hepatitis B core-related antigen levels and sustained HBeAg seroconversion in patients treated with nucleo(s)tide analogues.

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion experienced during nucleo(s)tide analogue (NUC) therapy is often not sustained. We aimed to study whether hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels predict sustained HBeAg seroconversion in patients treated with NUCs. We studied HBeAg-positive patients treated with NUCs for at least 6months. We quantified HBcrAg at baseline and at the time of HBeAg seroconversion and studied the relationship with HBeAg seroconversion and subsequent relapse. HBcrAg was quantified at baseline in 196 patients; levels varied significantly by HBV genotype and correlated with HBsAg, HBV DNA and HBeAg. Baseline HBcrAg levels were lower in patients who achieved HBeAg seroconversion than in those who did not; the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.802 (95% CI: 0.656-0.980, P=0.031); and this association was not sustained in multivariate analysis. HBcrAg remained detectable in all patients at the time of HBeAg seroconversion. Higher HBcrAg at the time of seroconversion was an independent predictor of relapse (adjusted HR: 1.855 (95% CI: 1.099-3.133, P=0.021), and none of the patients with HBcrAg<4.90 log U/mL experienced relapse. Baseline HBcrAg is not an independent predictor of HBeAg seroconversion during NUC therapy. HBcrAg remains detectable in patients after HBeAg seroconversion. Patients with lower levels at the time of seroconversion have a higher probability of sustained HBeAg seroconversion.

From the Editor’s desk…: April 2019

From the Editor’s desk…: April 2019

Diagnostic and analytical performance of the hepatitis B core related antigen immunoassay in hepatitis B patients

BackgroundNovel serological markers for Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are needed for prognosis and guidance of therapy. ObjectiveWe evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Fujirebio Lumipulse G HBcrAg immunoassay on the Fujirebio LUMIPULSE G1200 analyzer. Study designAnalytical performance was examined using three HBeAg positive HBV samples. Diagnostic specificity was assessed using subpanels of 54 confirmed acute HAV, HCV, HEV, B19, CMV and EBV infections. Diagnostic sensitivity was investigated in well-defined HBV positive patient groups, both treated and untreated, including immunocompromised patients. ResultsThe Lumipulse G HBcrAg immunoassay provided a linear measurement at a dilution between 1:100 and1:10,000. Six out of 54 samples showed non-specific reactivity in sera from acute CMV, EBV and HEV infections, of which 2 of them >3 log U/ml. The highest levels of HBcrAg were measured in HBeAg positive patients, in both treated and untreated as well as in immunocompromised patients. Untreated patients had relatively low serum HBcrAg levels in the inactive carrier phase, which increased upon progression into the HBeAg-negative hepatitis phase. Also, we showed that the applicability of HBcrAg to distinguish between patients with resolved HBV infection and false-positive reactivity to solitary anti-HBc is limited. ConclusionsOur study demonstrated significant differences in HBcrAg levels depending on HBeAg status, the clinical phase, as well as the treatment status. Specificity of the assay is good; only 2 out of 54 samples showed reactivity above 3 log U/ml. Before implementing the assay in clinical practice, additional research in larger patient cohorts should be carried out.

Serum HBcrAg is better than HBV RNA and HBsAg in reflecting intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA.

The correlation between serum HBcrAg and HBV RNA is unclear, and correlations of intrahepatic cccDNA with HBcrAg, HBV RNA and HBsAg are rarely reported in the same cohort. This study aimed to assess the correlation of HBcrAg with HBVRNA and HBsAg, and investigate whether serum HBcrAg is superior to serum HBV RNA and HBsAg in reflecting intrahepatic HBV cccDNA in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative CHB patients. In this study, 85 HBeAg-positive and 25 HBeAg-negative patients who have never received antiviraltherapy were included. Among HBeAg-positive patients, HBcrAg was correlated positively with HBsAg (r=0.564, P<0.001) and HBV RNA (r=0.445, P<0.001), and HBV RNA was also correlated positively with HBsAg (r=0.323, P=0.003). Among HBeAg-negative patients, no significant correlation was observed between HBcrAg, HBsAg and HBV RNA. By multivariable linear regression, HBcrAg (β=-0.563, P<0.001), HBsAg (β=-0.328, P<0.001) and HBV RNA (β=0.180, P=0.003) were all associated with cccDNA levels among HBeAg-positive patients, but only serum HBcrAg was associated with cccDNA level (β=0.774, P=0.000) among HBeAg-negative patients. HBcrAg was better correlated with cccDNA as compared to HBsAg and HBV RNA, irrespective of HBeAg status. Among HBeAg-positive patients, though HBcrAg level was influenced by hepatic inflammatory activity and HBV DNA levels, the good correlations of HBcrAg with cccDNA persisted after stratification by inflammatory activity and HBV DNA levels. In conclusion, correlations ofserum HBcrAg, HBV RNA and HBsAg levels differ significantly between HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, but serum HbcrAg correlates with cccDNA levels better than HBV RNA and HBsAg, irrespective of HBeAg status.