Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory: A Reply to Professor KnightT. W. HutchisonT. W. Hutchison Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 49, Number 5Oct., 1941 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/255765 Views: 20Total views on this site Citations: 9Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:HANS ALBERT, DARRELL ARNOLD, FRANK MAIER-RIGAUD Model Platonism: Neoclassical economic thought in critical light, Journal of Institutional Economics 8, no.33 (Jul 2012): 295–323.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137412000021John Hart Terence Hutchison and the introduction of Popper's falsifiability criterion to economics, Journal of Economic Methodology 18, no.44 (Dec 2011): 409–426.https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2011.628043John Hart Terence Hutchison and Frank Knight: a reappraisal of their 1940–1941 exchange, Journal of Economic Methodology 17, no.44 (Dec 2010): 359–373.https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2010.525247John Hart Machlup's misrepresentation of Hutchison's methodology, Journal of Economic Methodology 16, no.33 (Sep 2009): 325–340.https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780903129314Ross B. Emmett Realism and relevance in the economics of a free society: the Knight–Hutchison debate, Journal of Economic Methodology 16, no.33 (Sep 2009): 341–350.https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780903129322J. Daniel Hammond Frank Knight's Antipositivism, History of Political Economy 23, no.33 (Sep 1991): 359–381.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-23-3-359 Eva, Abraham Hirsch The Heterodox Methodology of Two Chicago Economists, Journal of Economic Issues 9, no.44 (Jan 2016): 645–664.https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1975.11503317SPIRO J. LATSIS Situational Determinism in Economics, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23, no.33 (Dec 2020): 207–245.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/23.3.207Thomas Mayer A hawk's eye view of economics, (): 237–249.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-4154(02)20031-0