Hartmann's Procedure Reversal Research Articles

Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure: Evaluating Outcomes of Single-Port Laparoscopic Approach Versus Conventional Approach.

Bowel restoration following Hartmann's procedure (HP) remains a topic of discussion and innovation. This article seeks to highlight and analyze the outcomes of conventional reversal approaches such as open surgery (OS) and conventional laparoscopic (CL) to single-port laparoscopic reversal (SPLR) approach to evaluate whether SPLR is a feasible alternative to the OS or CL approach. A PubMed search using keywords yielded 5,750 articles. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 40 articles of relevance were reviewed, and endpoints considered. These included 13 systematic reviews and 27 observational reviews, three of which identified themselves as retrospective or comparative studies. The analysis showed overwhelming support for CL over OS as a choice for HP reversal. Studies comparing SPLR to CL showed SPLR to be a safe and feasible alternative, given its significantly shorter operating times, hospitalization times, and complication rates.

Laparoscopic Hartmann s Reversal: A Single Center Experience.

Minimally invasive colorectal surgery showed multiple advantages in terms of morbidity, surgeons applied this approach to Hartmann reversal considering improving the reversal rate and postoperative outcome. The database from Fundeni Clinical Institute, General Surgery Department, was analyzed, selecting the laparoscopic Hartmann reversals. Nine cases were reported with a median age of 63 years, mean BMI 29 and three of them with prior open Hartmann surgery. The average operative time was 223 minutes, without any case necessitating ileostomy diversion. No anastomotic leakage was reported. The laparoscopic approach seems to be an attainable alternative in the reversal of Hartmann procedure, considering the experience of the surgical team and the patient's characteristics. Further studies are needed in order to confirm its superiority on larger case series.

Bilirubin, urobilinogen, pancreas elastase and bile acid in drain fluid. The GBUP-study: Analysis of biomarkers for a colorectal anastomotic leakage.

PurposeA colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) is a major complication after colorectal surgery and leads to high rates of morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. The study aims to evaluate the benefit of using bilirubin, urobilinogen, pancreas elastase and bile acid in the drain fluid (DF) as a predictive marker for the CAL.MethodsFrom June 2015 to October 2017 100 patients, who underwent left hemicolectomy (LH), sigma resection (SR), high anterior resection (HAR), low anterior resection (LAR) or reversal of Hartmann's Procedure (ROHP) were included in this monocentric non-randomized prospective clinical trial. During the first four postoperative days (POD) the concentration of bilirubin, urobilinogen, pancreas elastase and bile acid in the DF was measured.ResultsIn total 100 patients were recruited. 17 were excluded due to intraoperative decisions to conduct a protective stoma. 6 patients had a CAL. The patients of the control group (n = 77) and the patients who suffered from a CAL (n = 6) had no increased concentration of urobilinogen and pancreas elastase in the DF. The concentration of bile acid in the DF of the patients who suffered from a CAL differed from those of the control group on the 4th POD (p = 0.055).The concentration of bilirubin in the DF of the patients who suffered from a CAL significantly differed from those of the control group on the 1st POD (p = 0.031) and on the 3rd POD (p = 0.041).ConclusionBilirubin and bile acid in the DF may function as a predictive marker for a CAL.

Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a single-centre experience of 533 consecutive cases.

Hartmann's procedure (HP) is common. However, restoration of intestinal continuity is not so frequent. The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors which might influence outcomes following the reversal of HP. All consecutive patients who underwent elective and emergency HP in a single institution between January 1999 and December 2014 were included. Data concerning patient, disease and treatment features were collected. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to determine prognostic factors. A total of 533 consecutive patients underwent HP over the 16-year period. Factors that were associated with a higher probability of reversal were age (<69years), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (I or II), indication for HP (likelihood of anastomotic leakage) and length of rectal stump reaching or exceeding the sacral promontory. A reduced probability of intestinal reconstruction was associated with anal incontinence, Stage IV cancer, postoperative transfusion or elective surgery. Age, ASA grade, the indication for HP, the length of rectal stump, anal incontinence, tumour stage, postoperative transfusion and elective surgery determine the probability of reversal.

Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure: is it safe and feasible?

The Hartmann procedure (HP) consists of a sigmoidectomy followed by a terminal colostomy in the left iliac fossa and closure of the rectal stump. Although done as a temporary procedure, up to 74% of patients will not have stoma reversal with subsequent negative impact on the quality of life. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), The Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, and the articles from January 2000 until December 2015, edited in English, Italian and French, prospective or retrospective, were analyzed. Outcome variables included number of patients, mean age, sex, etiology of Hartmann's procedure, time interval between initial procedure and reversal procedure (in days), mean operative time (in minutes), number of patients converted to open surgery, causes of conversion, length of hospital stay, mortality, and complication rates. For the purpose of this review, only 21 studies were considered for the final analysis and a total of 681 patients were evaluated. The mean time interval between the initial procedure and the reversal (reported in 18 articles) was 181.6days (range 95-330days), while the mean operative time (reported in 20 articles) was 163.2min (range 62-285). Overall, 80 patients (11.7%) were converted to open technique. The length of hospitalization was between 3 and 12days. The mortality rate was reported in 19 articles and was 0.7% (5 patients). 113 patients (16.6%) underwent post-operative complications. The HP reversal is a challenging procedure, but it can be safely performed laparoscopically providing various advantages when compared to the open technique and it should be proposed only to a selected group of patients, young and without a severe peritonitis at the first operation.

Laparoscopic treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease: A review.

Up to 10% of acute colonic diverticulitis may necessitate a surgical intervention. Although associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, Hartmann's procedure (HP) has been considered for many years to be the gold standard for the treatment of generalized peritonitis. To reduce the burden of surgery in these situations and as driven by the accumulated experience in colorectal and minimally-invasive surgery, laparoscopy has been increasingly adopted in the management of abdominal emergencies. Multiple case series and retrospective comparative studies confirmed that with experienced hands, the laparoscopic approach provided better outcomes than the open surgery. This technique applies to all interventions related to complicated diverticular disease, such as HP, sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis (RPA) and reversal of HP. The laparoscopic approach also provided new therapeutic possibilities with the emergence of the laparoscopic lavage drainage (LLD), particularly interesting in the context of purulent peritonitis of diverticular origin. At this stage, however, most of our knowledge in these fields relies on studies of low-level evidence. More than ever, well-built large randomized controlled trials are necessary to answer present interrogations such as the exact place of LLD or the most appropriate sigmoid resection procedure (laparoscopic HP or RPA), as well as to confirm the advantages of laparoscopy in chronic complications of diverticulitis or HP reversal.

Robotic-assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis.

The minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for the reversal of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) has been shown to be a safe and feasible approach associated with low morbidity and fast recovery. Robotic surgery has not yet been described for HP reversal. We report the case of an 84-year-old man originally operated on in an emergency setting by conventional HP for complicated diverticulitis who underwent a robotic-assisted HP reversal. The surgical procedure and the post-operative follow-up were uneventful, with low post-operative pain, early return to bowel function, and discharge at day 3. The robotic surgery appeared to be a safe, feasible, and valuable approach for HP reversal.

Restoration of intestinal continuity after colectomy for non-occlusive ischemic colitis

Non-occlusive ischemic colitis (IC) is a rare and life-threatening abdominal disease associated with high rates of postoperative mortality. When surgery is performed, in patients with IC, either a Hartmann's procedure (HP) or a total colectomy and ileostomy is required. The possibility of restoration of intestinal continuity in surviving patients is an important issue. The aim of the present study was to report the outcome of surgically managed IC patients and to identify predictive factors for restoration of intestinal continuity and to assess the results of this procedure. Between January 1997 and May 2011, 96 IC patients underwent total colectomy and 68 underwent left colectomy. IC was spontaneous in 62 patients and occurred after prior surgery in 102. Eighty patients died during the postoperative period and nine died during the follow-up from an unrelated disease. Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 60 surviving patients were our study population. There were 44 men and 16 women with a mean age of 67 years ± 12 SD. Restoration of bowel continuity was performed in 24 patients (40%). There were no predictive factors for restoration of intestinal continuity in terms of sex, age, IC etiology, and the extent of colon resection at primary surgery. The median interval between first surgery and restoration of bowel continuity was 7.9 months (range 0.2-35 months). There were no postoperative deaths and the overall morbidity rate was 45% (11/24). No patients developed anastomotic leak or underwent unplanned reoperation. Reversal of HP after IC is feasible in 40% of surviving patients with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates. This restoration of intestinal continuity should therefore be discussed for every surviving IC patient.

Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure: safety and feasibility.

Aims: The present study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of patients receiving laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure (RHP) with those receiving open surgery.Methods: Records of all patients with RHP performed in our unit (including laparoscopic and open surgery) between 2000 and 2012 were retrieved. Data were retrospectively reviewed and compared.Results: Eighty-two RHPs were performed between 2000 and 2012. Thirty-five were performed with an open approach and 47 with a laparoscopic approach. Conversion rate was 28% in the laparoscopic group. There was no difference, between the two groups, in operation time or blood loss. The median length of stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (12 vs 14 days, P = 0.002) and fewer patients in the laparoscopic group had complications with post-operative paralytic ileus (2 vs 17%, P = 0.038). None of the patients in the laparoscopic group developed incisional hernia at the conclusion of follow-up, as opposed to five in the open group (0 vs 14%, P = 0.012).Conclusion: Laparoscopic RHP is safe and feasible, with more favorable surgical outcomes, when compared with open surgery. Conversion rate is acceptable. It should be the technique of choice for patients undergoing RHP.

Surgical Access Through the Stoma for Laparoscopic Reversal of Hartmann Procedures

The rate of stoma reversal after Hartmann procedure is low, principally because of the technically demanding nature of the reversal procedure and preexisting comorbid disease frequently present in this patient group. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure is an attractive alternative that can reduce perioperative morbidity but the feasibility of completing the procedure laparoscopically is often limited by extensive adhesion formation present after the initial open operation. We describe a technique for laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure where the stoma is mobilized externally and a pneumoperitoneum established through this preexisting defect. Results for the first 7 cases show a median operative duration of 132 minutes and length of hospital stay of 6 days with no conversions. Insertion of the operating ports under direct vision and a more limited dissection to facilitate the anastomosis represents an alternative operative strategy that can be performed successfully, even in patients with comorbid disease.

Sind eine laparoskopische Diskontinuitätsresektion und eine spätere laparoskopische Rekonstruktion bei der komplizierten Sigmadivertikulitis möglich?

Surgery of complicated sigmoid diverticulitis should be as gentle as possible. Serious time pressure, unpredictable operation fields and unprepared bowel determine the surgical strategy. Hence, we examine whether minimal invasive surgery (MIS) (i. e., Hartmann procedure) is suited for emergency conditions in selected patients. Furthermore, the objective of the study was to -assess the feasibility of the reversal of Hartmann procedure in appropriate patients after a preceding classical or laparoscopic intervention. -Between 2005 and 2009 128 patients with sigma diverticulitis were operated, 72 patients of them with complicated sigmoid diverticulitis (peritonitis, haemorrhage, ileus, perforation), The classical Hartmann procedure was performed in 45 (35 %) patients, 39 of them being treated within 24 hours. The laparoscopically assisted Hartmann procedure was realised in 15 patients and could be successfully completed in 13 cases. The cor-responding mortality rate was 0 %. A Hartmann reversal could be performed in 26 patients (58 %). A laparoscopic approach was chosen in 16 patients and could be successfully completed in 14 cases. 12 patients were operated with classical Hartmann reversal. The respective mortality rates in both groups were 0 %. We therefore conclude that in cases of peritonitis due to sigmoid diverticulitis laparoscopic surgery, like laparoscopically assisted Hartmann procedure and a subsequent laparoscopically assisted reversal could be recommended in selected patients.

Restoration of bowel continuity after surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis: should Hartmann’s procedure be considered a one‐stage procedure?

Hartmann's procedure (HP) still remains the most frequently performed procedure in acute perforated diverticulitis, but it results in a end colostomy. Primary anastomosis (PA) with or without defunctioning loop ileostomy (DI) seems a good alternative. The aim of this study was to assess differences in the rate of stomal reversal after HP and PA with DI and to evaluate factors associated with postreversal morbidity in patients operated for acute perforated diverticulitis. All 158 patients who had survived emergency surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis in five teaching hospitals in The Netherlands between 1995 and 2005 and underwent HP or PA with DI were retrospectively studied. Age, gender, ASA-classification, severity of primary disease, delay of stoma reversal, surgeon's experience, surgical procedure and type of anastomosis were analysed in relation to outcome after stoma reversal. Of the 158 patients, 139 had undergone HP and 19 PA with DI. The reversal-rate was higher in patients with DI (14/19; 74%) compared to HP (63/139; 45%) (P = 0.027) Delay between primary surgery and stoma reversal was shorter after PA with DI compared with HP (3.9 vs 9.1 months; P < 0.001). Cumulative postreversal morbidity after HP was 44%. Early surgical complications occurred in 22 of 63 patients. Morbidity after DI reversal was 15% (P < 0.001). Three patients died after HP reversal, none died after DI reversal. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 10 patients after HP reversal. This was less frequently observed when the operation was performed by a specialist colorectal surgeon (10%vs 33%; P = 0.049) and when a stapled anastomosis was performed (4%vs 24%; P = 0.037). Reversal of HP should only be performed by an experienced colorectal surgeon, preferably performing a stapled anastomosis, or probably not be performed at all, as it is accompanied by high postoperative morbidity and even mortality. It is important that these findings are taken in account for when performing primary emergency surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis.

Comparison of Conventional and Laparoscopic Hartmann's Procedure Reversal

This study compares open Hartmann's procedure reversal (OHPR) and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal (LHPR) in patients first treated for peritonitis (Henchey III or IV). Fourteen patients who underwent LHPR during a 2-year period were compared with 20 patients who had previously undergone an open procedure at the same institution. Conversion rate was 14.28%. Operating time was shorter for the laparoscopic group [143 (90 to 240) vs. 180 (90 to 350) min, P<0.05]. Hospital length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group [9.5 (4 to 18) vs. 11 (6 to 39)]. Use of patient-controlled analgesia was not significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group [3 (0 to 4) vs. 3.5 (0 to 8)]. Morbidities observed in the LHPR group include a parietal abscess and an anastomotic stenosis without surgical treatment. The OHPR group had 6 complications: 1 anastomotic leak and 5 incisional hernias. LHPR with a conversion rate of 14.28% seems to be a method with shorter operating time and less morbidity compared with OHPR.