Harry Kalven Research Articles

Reviews

Jurisprudence. By B. A. Wortley, o.b.e., ll.m. (Leeds), ll.d. (Manchester), Professor of Jurisprudence and International Law in the University of Manchester.The American Jury. By Harry Kalven Jr. and Hans Zeisel.Law Relating to Nuclear Energy. By Harry Street and F. R. Frame.Sources of Family Law. By J. C. Hall, m.a., ll.b. Cambridge Legal Case Book Series.Sovereignty Within the Law. By Arthur Larson, C. Wilfred Jenks and Others.The New Nations in International Law and Diplomacy. Edited by William V. O'Brien.Asian‐African Legal Consultative Committee. Report of the Sixth Session, Cairo, 1964; Seventh Session, Baghdad, 1965.International Law in Australia. Edited by D. P. O'Connell.Paget's Law of Banking. Seventh edition. By Maurice Megrah assisted by F. R. Ryder.Leading Cases in the Law of Banking. Second edition. By Lord Chorley and P. E. Smart.Cases on the Criminal Law, Procedure and Evidence of Nigeria (excluding the North). Law in Africa, No. 19. By Cyprian O. Okonkwo and Ian McLean.Soviet Criminal Law and Procedure: the R.S.F.S.R. Codes. Translated by H. J. Berman and J. W. Spindler, with an Introduction by Harold J. Berman.Nigerian Law of Landlord and Tenant. By M. O. Onwuamaegbu, b.a., ll.m., ph.d. (London), of the Inner Temple, Barrister‐at‐Law; Solicitor and Advocate of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.Sir John Latham and Other Papers. By Zelman Cowen.Of Law and Men. By Felix Frankfurter.Introduction to English Law. By Philip S. James. Sixth edition.Elements of English Law. By William Geldart. Seventh ed. by D. C. M. Yardley.The Book of English Law (as at the year 1966). By Edward Jenks. 6th revised edition by P. B. Fairest.Cowen on the Law of Negotiable Instruments in South Africa. Fourth edition. By Denis V. Cowen and Leonard Gering.Principles of Registered Land Conveyancing. By J. A. Holland, ll.b. and J. R. Lewis, ll.b.

Legal Aspects of the Civil Rights Movement.Donald B. King , Charles W. QuickThe Negro and the First Amendment.Harry Kalven Jr.

Previous articleNext article No AccessBook ReviewsLegal Aspects of the Civil Rights Movement. Donald B. King , Charles W. Quick The Negro and the First Amendment. Harry Kalven Jr. Sol RosenSol Rosen Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 28, Number 2May, 1966 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2127580 Views: 3Total views on this site Copyright 1966 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Fault, Accidents and the Wonderful World of Blum and Kalven

THIS year Professors Walter Blum and Harry Kalven of the University of Chicago Law School published in book form the Shulman lectures they had previously given at Yale.' These lectures expounded the thesis that fault might, after all, be a sound basis for liability in automobile accident cases. And, perhaps more important, they contended that none of the myriad plans which had recently been proposed, and which in one way or the other sought their basis in some form of risk spreading, could be supported. The breadth of the attack as well as the eminence of its authors would by themselves require a careful examination of this thesis. The fact that their position is essentially contrary to most current academic thought and, nonetheless, on the whole wrong makes such examination essential.2 What then in essence is it that Blum and Kalven are saying? The main outline of their analysis can be stated simply. First they say that there is no evidence that any automobile compensation plan can, out of its own economies, pay the added costs of non-fault compensation. If there were, and if these economies could not be achieved in another way, Blum and Kalven, like good classical economists, would accept the notion that such a plan was worthwhile. The gainers would be able to compensate the losers, and in some traditional economic sense a more

The New York Times Case: A Note on "The Central Meaning of the First Amendment"

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe New York Times Case: A Note on "The Central Meaning of the First Amendment"Harry Kalven, Jr.Harry Kalven, Jr. Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Supreme Court Review Volume 19641964 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1964.3108698 Views: 184Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1964 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Stephan Stohler Giving Succor to Extremism?: Judicial Behavior toward Extreme Speech in Constitutional Democracies, Journal of Law and Courts 10, no.22 (Jul 2022): 287–318.https://doi.org/10.1086/716786Erik Ugland United States and International Communication Rights Frameworks and the Pursuit of Global Consensus, (Apr 2021): 75–86.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119719564.ch6Ali Noor Mohamed Journalism and activist democratic theory and ethics: When the ‘chilling effects’ of libel can lose effect, Journalism 21, no.99 (Aug 2018): 1212–1228.https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918796583Daniel Hemel, Ariel Porat , Journal of Legal Analysis 11 ( 2019): 46.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz004Daniel Jacob Hemel, Ariel Porat Free Speech and Cheap Talk, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3323081Chang Sup Park Online speech and democratic culture: a comparison of freedom of online speech between South Korea and the United States, Asian Journal of Communication 26, no.33 (Feb 2016): 262–277.https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2016.1144775Kirsty Hughes, Neil M. Richards The Atlantic divide on privacy and free speech, (Mar 2016): 164–198.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316402467.009Dale A. Herbeck Falsely Shouting Fire in a Crowded Theater, a Revolutionary Spark, and Burning the House to Roast the Pig: Fire Metaphors and the First Amendment, Free Speech Yearbook 44, no.11 (Dec 2012): 15–26.https://doi.org/10.1080/08997225.2009.10556343Joseph Russomanno Freedom of the Press, Concept of, (Jun 2008).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecf046Paula C. Arledge, Edward V. Heck A Freshman Justice Confronts the Constitution: Justice O'Connor and the First Amendment, Western Political Quarterly 45, no.33 (Sep 2016): 761–772.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299204500311E. V. Heck, A. C. Ringelstein The Burger Court and the Primacy of Political Expression, Political Research Quarterly 40, no.33 (Sep 1987): 413–425.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298704000304Robert C. Post Defaming Public Officials: On Doctrine and Legal History, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 12, no.2-32-3 (Nov 2018): 539–557.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1987.tb00546.xKent Greenawalt Speech and Crime, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 5, no.44 (Nov 2018): 645–785.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1980.tb01036.xHelmut Steinberger Die Unterscheidung zwischen „expression“ und „action“ als Kriterium der Reichweite der Freiheitsrechte, (Jan 1974): 575–592.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65673-6_9 Frank R. Strong Fifty Years of "Clear and Present Danger": From Schenck to Brandenburg-and beyond, The Supreme Court Review 1969 (Sep 2015): 41–80.https://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1969.3108673 Harry Kalven, Jr. Broadcasting, Public Policy and the First Amendment, The Journal of Law and Economics 10 (Oct 2015): 15–49.https://doi.org/10.1086/466629

Congressional Testing of Linus Pauling

•This is the first of two articles on the recent appearances of Nobel laureate Linus Pauling before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee. It presents the legal framework of Mr. Pauling's encounters with the Committee, reviewing the issues raised by his refusal to answer a particular inquiry, and evaluating the legal case that might have resulted had he been cited for contempt of Congress. The second article will discuss the style and content of the hearings, and the Committee's view of its function and of the decencies of official interrogation. •Harry Kalven, Jr., author of the memorable analysis of the Oppenheimer case in the September 1954 Bulletin, is a Professor in the University of Chicago Law School.

Obscenity and the Law. Norman St. John-Stevas

Previous articleNext article No AccessReview ArticleObscenity and the Law. Norman St. John-Stevas Harry Kalven, Jr.Harry Kalven, Jr. Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Library Quarterly Volume 27, Number 3Jul., 1957 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/618435 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 1Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1957 University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article: Harry Kalven, Jr. The Metaphysics of the Law of Obscenity, The Supreme Court Review 1960 (Sep 2015): 1–45.https://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1960.3108685

The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation. By Walter J. Blum and Harry Kalven, Jr..

<i>The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation</i>. By Walter J. Blum and Harry Kalven, Jr..