Abstract Background Electronic cigarettes (EC) have gained popularity as an alternative to traditional cigarette smoking. The harms of traditional cigarette smoking in Crohn’s disease (CD) are well established, but it is unclear if EC have similar harmful effects. Our aim was to determine the prevalence, predictors and impact of EC on clinical outcomes in patients with IBD. Methods This a cross-sectional study of a prospectively maintained single-center IBD registry from September 1st 2023-September 30th, 2024. The study included all patients aged 14-years and older who had a confirmed diagnosis of IBD including CD, ulcerative colitis (UC), IBD-unclassified (IBD-U), excluding those with pouchitis. The Primary outcomes were to determine the prevalence and predictors of EC use among patients diagnosed with IBD. The secondary outcomes assessed the impact of EC on clinical outcomes in IBD patients including the need for surgical intervention, CD progression (perianal disease, stricturing or penetrating complications), need for > 2 advanced therapies and composite outcome (intestinal surgery, disease progression, > 2 advanced therapies). Results A total of 412 patients were enrolled in the study (mean age 33 ± 13 years; 68% with CD) and 55% were male. Overall, 25% (n=102) of the cohort had traditional cigarette smoking history. EC use prevalence among IBD patients was 10.2% (n=42) (6.6% current, 3.6% previous users). Compared to non-users, EC-previous/current users were more likely to be male and have and have history of traditional cigarette smoking (Table 1). The prevalence of EC use was similar between patients with and without a history of intestinal surgery (10% for both, p > 0.9), with no significant differences noted in CD (p = 0.4) or UC (p = 0.5) subgroups. In CD, the prevalence of EC use was similar in patients with and without stricturing disease (8.9% vs. 13%; p=0.3), and perianal disease (13% vs. 11%; p=0.7). For penetrating disease, EC use was 7.8%, compared to 16% in those without penetrating disease (p=0.06). No difference in EC use was found in those patients who required > 2 advanced therapies (10%; n=4) vs. those who required ≤ 2 advanced therapies (10%; n=38) (p > 0.9). EC use was noted in 11% (n=29) in patients who developed the composite outcome vs. 8.2% (n=13) in those who did not (p=0.3). Conclusion Up to 10% of IBD patients reported EC use, which was associated with male sex and history of traditional cigarette smoking. In our cohort, no association between EC use and unfavourable clinical outcomes was noted but larger studies with longer follow up duration are needed to further elucidate the impact of EC use on clinical outcomes in IBD.
Read full abstract