Women and Journalism. Suzanne Franks. London: I.B. Tauris, 2013. 85 pp. $28 pbk.In her short but insightful book, Women and Journalism, author Suzanne Franks spends much time pointing out the ironies and contradictions inherent in women's employment in journalism. Women outnumber men in most college journalism departments, and many who have entered the field in the last few decades are better educated than their male counterparts. Yet very few women hold top executive posts at media companies, and those who work in newsrooms are often paid less than their male colleagues. And, nearly fifty years after the second wave of feminism, women are still viewed primarily as feature rather than news writers. She subtitles her Introduction, Backwards and forwards, onwards and upwards.Women and Journalism accomplishes a lot in a short space, and it is written in a direct and concise style-there is little or no fat in this book, indicating that either Franks herself is a tight and seamless writer, or that she has an excellent editor. Numbers and survey results form the backbone of this book-making it credible-and Franks does not shout from a soapbox to bemoan the fact that women have yet to achieve equality in the newsrooms of the United States and much of Western Europe. But the book is far from dry and soulless, and would be compelling to anyone interested in newsroom employment and women in the media. Franks, a professor at City University London, is a former BBC producer, and the focus of the book is journalism in England. But she also discusses the media environment for women in the United States-which parallels that of England in many ways-so the book is relevant for American readers.Women and Journalism differs from books on similar topics for two reasons: first, the author maintains, advancing technology and the rapidly changing journalistic landscape have rendered obsolete the often-used term glass ceiling. Society and the media culture have become so complex that the term is an oversimplification, she believes. She examines the role of society and culture in shaping the industry because she believes the subject of women in journalism cannot be examined in a vacuum. For instance, she notes that sources quoted in hard news stories have always been predominately male, reinforcing the view that it is men who hold the real authority when discussing serious matters in Western society. She implies that until women are seen as authoritative in all aspects of society and are widely quoted as experts, their role in newsrooms may not change. …