Hand-sewn Anastomosis Group Research Articles

Comparative retrospective study on surgical outcomes of hand‐sewn anastomosis versus stapling anastomosis for colectomy using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan with propensity score matching

AbstractBackgroundIntestinal anastomosis is performed by two main methods: hand‐sewn anastomosis (HA) and stapling anastomosis (SA). Studies on anastomosis are still being reported and are an ongoing area of interest. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of each by comparing them with description and statistical analysis using a nationwide inpatient database.MethodsWe collected data for colon cancer patients who underwent colectomy between April 2014 and March 2022 using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database. In the descriptive analysis, we described the background of the study population and the number of each method. In the statistical analysis, we used propensity score matching to achieve balanced covariates and showed the results of the comparative study using risk ratios and risk differences.ResultsA total of 232 155 cases were selected (HA group: 40 764; SA group: 191 391). SA was performed more frequently than HA during the study period, with the proportion of SA increasing over the last few years (~80% in 2015 and 85% in 2021). We obtained 40 760 pairs through propensity score matching. The comparison of postoperative events varied by outcome (reoperation: 517 [1.27%] vs 380 [0.93%]; risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 1.55], endoscopic intestinal hemostasis: 17 [0.04%] vs 80 [0.20%]; RR: 0.21 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.36]).ConclusionSA is becoming more common in colectomy. The risk of reoperation could be higher in the HA group, while the risk of postoperative endoscopic intestinal hemostasis could be higher in the SA group.

Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses after bowel resection in patients with crohn disease

BackgroundAnastomosis configuration is an essential step in treatment to restore continuity of the gastrointestinal tract following bowel resection in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). However, the association between anastomotic type and surgical outcome remains controversial. This retrospective study aimed to compare early postoperative complications and surgical outcome between stapler and handsewn anastomosis after bowel resection in Crohn’s disease.MethodsBetween 2001 and 2018, a total of 339 CD patients underwent bowel resection with anastomosis. Patient characteristics, intraoperative data, early postoperative complications, and outcomes were analyzed and compared between two groups of patients. Group 1 consisted of patients with stapler anastomosis and group 2 with handsewn anastomosis.ResultsNo significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative surgical complications between the stapler and handsewn anastomosis groups (25% versus 24.4%, p = 1.000). Reoperation for complications and postoperative hospital stay were similar between the two groups.ConclusionOur analysis showed that there were no differences in anastomotic leak, nor postoperative complications, mortality, reoperation for operative complications, or postoperative hospital stay between the stapler anastomosis and handsewn anastomosis groups.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy plus Duodenojejunal Bypass: Learning Curve Analysis and Technical Feasibility of Duodenojejunostomy Using Linear Stapler.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy plus duodenojejunal bypass (LSG-DJB) has emerged as an alternative bypass surgery. Despite its potential benefits, the technical challenges of the procedure have limited its adoption. This study aims to present the learning curve for LSG-DJB and explore potentially beneficial technical modifications for the standardization of the procedure. The study retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent LSG-DJB as a primary procedure from July 2014 through September 2021. Baseline characteristics, weight loss outcomes, remission of metabolic diseases, and perioperative complications were assessed. The operative time was analyzed across both time trends and anastomosis type subgroups. At 1-year follow-up after LSG-DJB, the mean %total weight loss and the mean BMI loss were 25.38 ± 8.58% and 9.38 ± 4.25kg/m2, respectively. Remission rates for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were 72.0% (67/93), 84.1% (37/44), and 70.3% (52/74), respectively. In the analysis of operative time, the learning curve exhibited a plateau after 25 cases. The mean operative time was 136.00 ± 21.64min in the stapled anastomosis group, and 150.62 ± 25.42min in the hand-sewn anastomosis group. The learning curve for LSG-DJB plateaued after 25 cases. In the LSG-DJB procedure, stapled duodenojejunal anastomosis is feasible and achieves similar outcomes to the hand-sewn method.

Can the Single-stapling Technique Following Intersphincteric Resection with Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Become the New Standard Anastomosis?

For transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME), the indication for single-stapling technique (SST) has been expanded to include lower anastomosis, even in intersphincteric resection (ISR). We focused on the anastomotic techniques following ISR with TaTME and examined the feasibility and safety of the SST below the anorectal junction (ARJ). Data on postoperative anastomosis-related complications and anorectal function was evaluated in comparison to conventional manual hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis in ISR with TaTME. We examined patients with 3-6 cm tumors from the anal verge who underwent ISR with TaTME between January 2018 and March 2020, and whose anastomotic line was located below the ARJ. Postoperative short-term outcomes and anorectal functions were compared. We also analyzed the effects of various factors on major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) using multivariate logistic regression analysis. In total, 87 patients-48 in the hand-sewn anastomosis group and 39 in the SST group-were included in this study. SST below the ARJ in ISR with TaTME did not exacerbate surgical outcomes, including anastomosis-related complications. The SST group had a significantly lower LARS score as compared to the hand-sewn anastomosis group, and the proportion of major LARS was significantly lower. Only hand-sewn anastomosis was identified as a statistically significant independent risk factor for major LARS. In TaTME, SST below the ARJ was safe and feasible and had a lower negative impact on postoperative anastomosis-related complications and anorectal function as compared to hand-sewn anastomosis. Thus, SST is a promising anastomotic option for patients with low-lying rectal tumors.

Evaluation of the outcome of linear stapler anastomosis in comparison to hand-sewn anastomosis in elective loop transverse colostomy closure in children: a study in a tertiary care hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Background: Conventional hand suture technique of intestinal anastomosis has been in vogue for decades. Staplers which developed to simplify surgery began to have significant impact. Objective were to see outcome of linear stapler anastomosis in comparison to hand-sewn anastomosis in elective loop transverse colostomy closure in children. Methods: This prospective interventional study was carried out in the department of pediatric surgery, Dhaka medical college hospital, Dhaka from January 2018 to December 2019 over a period of 2 years. Forty-seven patients who underwent loop transverse colostomy closure were included in this study. Patients were allocated by purposive sampling into two groups, group A (linear stapler anastomosis) and group B (hand-sewn anastomosis). Results: Mean age of the patients were 5.79±3.23 years and 4.21±3.13 years in linear stapler anastomosis group and hand-sewn anastomosis group respectively. Male to female ratio was 1.2:1 in linear stapler anastomosis group and 5.25:1 in hand-sewn anastomosis group. The mean duration of return of bowel movements (passage of flatus after surgery) in linear stapler method was 32.82±6.04 hours and in hand sewn method was 40.56±5.35 hours (p<0.05). Oral feeding was started earlier in patients who underwent linear stapler anastomosis (3.18±0.39 days), as compared to hand-sewn anastomosis (4.16±0.37 days) (p≤0.001). The mean cost in linear stapler method was Tk. 4072±158 and in hand sewn method was Tk. 1440±362. Anastomotic leakage was lower (4.5%) in linear stapler anastomosis than that in hand-sewn anastomosis (20.0%) (p>0.05). Conclusions: Stapling technique can be used safely and effectively as a part of modern Surgeon`s armory and one should be equally expert with stapler guns as with needle holders and sutures.

A retrospective comparative study on stapler verses hand sewn technique in gastrointestinal anastomosis of twenty-five cases each

Background: In gastrointestinal surgery after resection of bowel loops, anastomosis of the bowel loops forms the main part of the surgery. The evolution of mechanical sutures by stapler devices is a technological advancement which helps anastomosis of bowel loops with less tissue injury and decreased time duration of procedure. Objective of current study was to compare the hand sewn anastomosis with stapler anastomosis in various types of elective gastrointestinal surgeries. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted in department of general surgery at New Civil Hospital, Surat. The study included 50 patients of either gender and different age groups. Results: Out of 50 patients, 7 patients had Benign Gastric Outlet Obstruction (GOO), 18 patients had Post corrosive esophageal stricture, 5 patients had obstruction, 6 patients had post ileostomy status, 5 patients had carcinoma of ascending colon, 1 patient had carcinoma of caecum, 4 patients had ileo-caecal growth, 3 patients had carcinoma of descending colon, and 1 patient had sigmoid colon growth. In stapler anastomosis group Mean Total operative time was (156.20±45.21) mins whereas in handsewn anastomosis group Mean Total operative time was (188.40±48.32) mins with p value of 0.019. Conclusions: In this study, one distinct advantage of staplers was the consistent reduction in operating time. However, no significant difference was found between the stapler and hand-sewn groups with respect to other parameters such as restoration of intestinal function, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications like leakage, fistula or stricture formation.

Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Esophagectomy is a highly invasive surgical procedure; however, anastomotic leakage is one of the major surgical complications that should be prevented. Institutions have their own inherited or specialized anastomosis methods. The superior anastomosis procedure remains unknown despite the many studies to determine the optimal method. The present study enrolled 341 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between January 2009 and January 2019. The anastomosis method was changed from circular stapled anastomosis to hand-sewn anastomosis in February 2014 to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. We retrospectively compared short-term results (anastomotic leakage and stricture) between hand-sewn and circular stapled anastomoses. Analysis of heterogeneity after propensity score matching between the 107 patients in the hand-sewn anastomosis group and 107 patients in the circular stapled anastomosis group revealed almost equal distributions. The incidence rate of anastomotic leakage was significantly lower in the hand-sewn anastomosis group than in the circular stapled anastomosis group (9 vs. 20%, hazard ratio: 2.521; 95% confidence interval: 1.112-5.716; P = 0.027). No significant difference was found in the incidence of anastomotic stricture (16 vs. 18%, P = 0.844). Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the incidence of anastomotic leakage in any of the tumor locations between the two anastomosis procedures. For esophagogastric anastomosis in the neck after esophagectomy, hand-sewn anastomosis is superior to circular stapled anastomosis with regard to reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage.

Short-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic colectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study from a single institution.

To compare the postoperative short-term results of intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) using overlap anastomosis (OLA), with those of extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) using functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) or hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA), after laparoscopic colectomy (LAC). The subjects of this retrospective study were 208 patients with colon cancer who underwent OLA, FEEA, or HSA after LAC at our institution, between 2018 and 2021. The short-term results of the OLA group were compared with those of the FEEA and HSA groups, respectively, using a propensity score-matching method. The mean operative time for anastomosis was longer in the OLA group than in the FEEA and HSA groups (p < 0.0001). The mean blood loss volume was less in the OLA group than in the FEEA and HSA groups (p = 0.0344 and p = 0.0002, respectively). The mean skin incision size was smaller in the OLA group than in the FEEA and HSA groups (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0031, respectively). None of the patients in the OLA group had surgical site infections. Three to five patients were required for the surgeon to plateau on the learning curve. Although IA required more time than EA, the skills appeared to improve with experience and the short-term results were superior to those of EA.

637 ANALYSIS OF THE OUTCOMES OF HAND-SEWN COMPARED TO THE STAPLED ANASTOMOSIS AFTER TOTAL GASTRECTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

Abstract The complications related to esophagojejunal anastomosis are among the leading issues in the postoperative period of total gastrectomy. This review aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of hand-sewn esophageal anastomosis compared to mechanical anastomosis for the reconstruction of total gastrectomy. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies evaluating hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis was performed. Results A total of 12 studies were selected, comprising 1761 individuals. The operation time was higher in the hand-sewn anastomosis group (mean difference [MD] = 22.13 minutes; 95%CI: 3.97, 40.29). However, the risk for anastomotic fistula was not different between the groups (difference risk [DR] = 0.00; 95%CI: −0.03, 0.03). Also, the rate of intracavitary abscess (DR = -0.02; 95%CI: −0.07, 0.02); the reoperation rate (DR = -0.00; 95%CI: −0.01, 0.01); postoperative complications (DR = 0.12; 95%CI: −0.01, 0.25); postoperative mortality (DR = 0.02; 95%CI: −0.02, 0.06); anastomotic stenosis (DR = -0.01; 95%CI: −0.03, 0.00); and length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD] = 3.52 days; 95%CI: −0.49, 7.53) were no different between groups. Conclusion The results indicate that the hand-sewn and stapled esophageal anastomosis have similar surgical outcomes. Stapled anastomosis has a shorter operation time being.

Application value of hand-sewn anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BackgroundDigestive tract reconstruction in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy can be divided into two types: instrument anastomosis and hand-sewn anastomosis. This study explored the feasibility and safety of hand-sewn sutures in esophagojejunostomy of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, compared with instrument anastomosis using an overlap linear cutter.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 to January 2020 at one institution. The clinical data of 50 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, with an average follow-up time of 12 months, were collected. The clinicopathologic data, short-term survival prognosis, and results of patients in the hand-sewn anastomosis (n=20) and the overlap anastomosis (n=30) groups were analyzed.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the groups in sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, preoperative complications, abdominal operation history, tumor size, pTNM stage, blood loss, first postoperative liquid diet, exhaust time, or postoperative length of hospital stay. The hand-sewn anastomosis group had a significantly prolonged operation time (204±26.72min versus 190±20.90min, p=0.04) and anastomosis time (58±22.0min versus 46±15.97min, p=0.029), and a decreased operation cost (CNY 77,100±1700 versus CNY 71,900±1300, p<0.0001). Postoperative complications (dynamic ileus, abdominal infection, and pancreatic leakage) occurred in three patients (15%) in the hand-sewn anastomosis group and in four patients (13.3%) in the overlap anastomosis group (anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, dynamic ileus, and duodenal stump leakage).ConclusionThe hand-sewn anastomosis method of esophagojejunostomy under totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy is safe and feasible and is an important supplement to linear and circular stapler anastomosis. It may be more convenient regarding obesity, a relatively high position of the anastomosis, edema of the esophageal wall, and short jejunal mesentery.

Digestive tract reconstruction of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparison of the intracorporeal overlap, intracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis, and extracorporeal anastomosis.

The application of esophagojejunostomy has certain difficulties in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG). This is due to the higher requirement for surgical techniques and the lack of any unified standards. This study aim to explore the practicability and safety of intracorporeal overlap and intracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis compared with extracorporeal anastomosis. The clinical pathological data of 56 patients who underwent TLTG from March 2016 to December 2020 in the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the method of anastomosis, the patients were divided into the overlap (n=36) and the hand-sewn anastomosis (n=20). Patients who receive laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG; n=74) formed the control group. The basic clinical data, and intraoperative and postoperative results of the patients were assessed. Compared with the control group, the overlap anastomosis and hand-sewn anastomosis groups showed no significant differences in clinicopathological data and short-term postoperative recovery. There were no significant differences between the overlap and the control group in operation time nor anastomosis time. However, the anastomosis time of the hand-sewn anastomosis group was significantly prolonged compared to the control group (53.20±14.14 vs. 43.01±12.53 minutes, P=0.002). Compared with the control group, the operation cost was significantly higher in the overlap group (CNY 81,300±6,100 vs. CNY 76,600±6,800, P=0.001), but significantly lower in the hand-sewn anastomosis group (CNY 71,900±1,700 vs. CNY 76,600±6,800, P=0.003). Early postoperative complications occurred in 5 cases (13.9%) in the overlap group, 3 cases (15.0%) in the hand-sewn anastomosis group, and 11 cases (14.9%) in the control group. There were 3 cases (8.3%) of postoperative anastomotic-related complications in the overlap group. No anastomotic-related complications were observed in the hand-sewn anastomosis group. The overlap anastomosis and hand-sewn anastomosis are practical and safe. Furthermore, the overlap anastomosis may be more suitable for patients with lower cardia and fundic lesions. The hand-sewn method has a wider range of indications pending advanced surgical skills, and is an effective supplementary technique for instrument anastomosis.

357 HAND-SEWN VERSUS STAPLED CERVICAL ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS FOR ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA: STUDY OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES FROM A HIGH VOLUME CENTER OF INDIA

Abstract Esophageal cancer is a dreaded disease because of its adverse effects on swallowing and therefore the quality of life. Surgical resection offers the best outcome. The mainstay of any esophageal surgery is a well healed anastomosis without any leakage or stricture. Various techniques of anastomosis have been described. Hand sewn suture have been used since long. Surgical staplers have been recently introduced. We hereby describe a comparative study between these two surgical techniques. Methods Patients undergoing total esophagectomy with neck anastomosis between January 2013 and March 2019 were analysed. Esophagectomy was done by either trans-thoracic or trans-hiatal approach. The stomach was utilized as conduit and anastomosis was done in the neck in all patients. The gastric conduit was pulled into the neck by the posterior mediastinal route. End to side hand sewn anastomosis (HA) was done in 85 patients using 3-0 non absorbable sutures as a single full thickness layer. Side to side stapler anastomosis (SA) was done by posterior vertical and anterior horizontal firing of 45 mm blue linear stapler in 61 patients. Results The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak. The secondary outcome measures included operative time, anastomosis time, blood loss, anastomotic stricture, mean intensive care unit(ICU) stay, ambulation, removal of intercostal drains, starting of feeding jejunostomy and oral feeds, mean hospital stay. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS. There was 9 cases anastomotic leak in the HA group while in the SA group there were none. Anastomotis stricture occurred in 12 patients in HA group while 3 werein the SA group and it’s statistically significant. The anastomotic time, ICU stay, time of starting oral feeds and mean hospital stay were statistically significant. Conclusion A well-healed anastomosis is the mainstay of the successful outcome of esophagectomy. Anastomotic leaks and strictures were the main complications of esophageal surgery. Various techniques of anastomosis have been described over the years. HA has been the standard of care since the inception of esophageal surgery. As technology developed SA got introduced and was found to have certain advantages over HA as shown in our study. SA may be used as preferred technique for esophago-gastrostomy.

Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study

BackgroundControversies in terms of efficacy and postoperative advantages surround stapled esophagogastric anastomosis compared with the hand-sewn technique as a treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of hand-sewn end-to-side esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for the aforementioned patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study involved examining the medical records of 433 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from March 2010 to March 2016. All the patients were operated using end-to-side hand-sewn esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. 409 of the patients received a year’s worth of follow-up evaluations. All the cases were revisited in 2 weeks as well as in four, eight, and 12 months after surgery. The patients were assessed in terms of postoperative outcomes, including reflux symptoms, anastomotic leakage and stricture, and the need for anastomotic dilatation.ResultsHand-sewn anastomosis was carried out in 271 (62.5%) patients, whereas stapled anastomosis was performed in 162 (37.4%) patients. The mean operative times were 214.46 ± 84.33 min and 250.55 ± 43.31 min for the stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis groups, respectively (P = 0.028). The two groups showed no significant differences with respect to stays in intensive care units and hospitals. Postoperatively, 38 (14.67%) cases of anastomotic leakage were detected in the hand-sewn anastomosis group, with incidence being significantly higher than that in the stapled anastomosis group (8 cases or 5.33%; P = 0.002). Anastomotic stricture occurred less frequently in the patients who underwent stapled anastomosis (P = 0.004). Within the one-year follow-up period, the patients treated via hand-sewn anastomosis more frequently required anastomotic dilatation (P = 0.02).ConclusionSide-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis may reduce operation times and decrease the rates of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and anastomotic dilatation in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy.

Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of six intestinal anastomoses in dogs.

To compare leak pressures and construct completion time of six intestinal anastomoses and report normal canine gastrointestinal thickness. Experimental study. Grossly normal jejunal segments (n = 140) from 10 fresh canine cadavers. Gastrointestinal thickness was recorded. Eight-centimeter cooled canine cadaveric jejunal segments were randomly assigned to a control group (20 segments) and six treatment groups (20 segments/group [10 constructs/group]): (1) handsewn anastomosis (HSA), (2) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA)-blue thoracoabdominal (TA; FEESA-TAB), (3) FEESA-green TA (FEESA-TAG), (4) FEESA TA-gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA), (5) FEESA with suture oversew (FEESA-O), and (6) skin staples (SS). Construct assembly time, initial leak pressure (ILP), maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP), and leakage location were compared. Initial leak pressures (mean ± SD) for control (308.38 ± 115.91 mm Hg), HSA (41.96 ± 15.97), FEESA-TAB (31.71 ± 15.71), FEESA-TAG (27.24 ± 14.11), FEESA-GIA (25.62 ± 11.22), FEESA-O (31.01 ± 17.38), and SS (44.42 ± 28.88) groups were compared. No difference in ILP (P > .24) or MIP (P > .17) was detected between treatment groups. Sutured anastomoses took up to 10 times longer to complete (P = .0025). The stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum mural thicknesses (mean ± SD) were 3.99 ± 0.44 mm, 2.34 ± 0.16, 2.49 ± 0.28, and 2.30 ± 0.31, respectively. The ILP of all anastomoses exceeded maximum intraluminal peristaltic pressures. Stapled anastomoses were faster to complete. All anastomoses may be considered when performing an intestinal resection and anastomosis, with stapled anastomoses resulting in a shorter surgical time. Canine intestinal thickness may warrant use of a larger staple size.

Comparison study stapled versus Hand sewn method for small bowel anastomosis surgery

Intestinal anastomosis is one of the most commonly performed procedure it is required to re-establish gastrointestinal continuity after surgical resection , traumatic disruption or bypass procedure.&#x0D; Since the second half of the 20th century , mechanical suture (stapler) has been in use and became a popular method in bowel anastomosis.&#x0D; Our study involved the comparing of the postoperative outcome between hand sewn anastomosis(HS) and stapled anastomosis(SA) for patients with trauma cases in emergency and elective cases .mainly in the view of duration of operation , postoperative hospitalization time , fistula formation rate , morbidity and mortality .&#x0D; There were no significant differences between SA group and HS group in operative indication or other parameters.&#x0D; In both emergency and elective intestinal surgery comparable results can be achieved using mechanical and manual anastomosis with the same outcome and no significant differences found only in the duration of the operation.

Mechanical factors in the prediction of integrity of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in ex-vivo RYGB models

BackgroundSurgical staplers represent one of the important instruments in modern surgery. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures. Various techniques have been described for performing gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis, including linear stapled anastomosis (LSA), circular stapled anastomosis (CSA) and hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA). ObjectivesAn ex-vivo porcine-based experiment was designed to compare the mechanical integrity of the GJ anastomosis among the 3 different techniques by measuring burst pressure (BP). SettingLaboratory-based study conducted at the clinical skills laboratory at Birmingham Heartlands Hospitals, Birmingham, United Kingdom. MethodsPorcine stomachs and small bowels were used to create a GJ model. Four GJ anastomosis models each were created using circular stapler (CSA group) and hand-sewn techniques (HSA group). Stomach and small bowel thickness were recorded. BP was measured by sequential injections of methylene-blue diluted saline until a leak was detected. Total volume until leak is recorded. Compliance (C) was calculated using the formula C = ΔP/ΔV. ResultsResults from our previous experiment for the LSA group are included. One model was excluded from the CSA and the HSA groups due to technical errors. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Total volume in LSA, CSA, and HSA groups was 60 ± 4.08 mL, 73.67 ± 3.22 mL, and 51.67 ± 20.21 mL, respectively. BP in LSA, CSA, and HSA groups was 18 ± 4.69 mm Hg, 20.33 ± 5.77 mm Hg, and 9.67 ± 3.79 mm Hg, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in BP among the 3 groups (P = .033; Kruskal-Wallis test). C in LSA, CSA, and HSA were 3.50 ± .88 mm Hg/mL, 3.78 ± .85 mm Hg/mL, and 5.39 ± 1.34 mm Hg/mL, respectively (P = .064). ConclusionBP was higher in CSA and LSA groups compared with the HSA group, suggesting a mechanically stronger anastomosis. Despite the lack of statistical significance, higher BP recorded in the CSA group than in the LSA group suggests better anastomotic integrity.

Completely Linear Stapled Versus Handsewn Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy.

Very limited data is present which compares completely linear stapled to handsewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Primary objective was to determine whether linearly stapled (LS) anastomosis has lower clinically apparent leaks, when compared to handsewn anastomosis (HS). Secondary objectives were morbidity, mortality, overall leak and stricture rates, and presence of a symptomatic cervical stricture. This is a comparative study of 77 patients who underwent LS (n = 29) and HS (n = 48) cervical anastomosis. Anastomotic leak was found to be 19.4% (15/77). In the HS group, 27.08% (13/48) and in the LS group, 6.89% (2/29), respectively, leaked (p = 0.03), relative risk (RR)-3.93 (95% CI 1.21-15.25). 32.5% (23/77) patients remained admitted for more than 14days. 52.1% (25/48) patients in the HS group were discharged within 14days of surgery; whereas; 93.1% (27/29) were discharged in LS group (p = 0.001), RR-6.95 (95% CI 2.13-25.94). Overall, 90-day mortality was 7.8% (6/77). In the HS group, 8.3% (4/48) patients died while in the LS group, 6.8% (2/29) patients died (p = 0.82), RR-1.21(95% CI 0.27-5.53). In the HS group, 6.25% (3/48) patients were diagnosed with stricture compared to 6.8% (2/29) patients in the LS group (p = 0.9), RR-0.91 (95% CI 0.19-4.44). Overall stricture rate was 6.4% (5/77). Cervical anastomosis done with linear staplers has less leak rates compared to handsewn anastomosis.

Proctocolectomy with J pouch. Ileo-anal anastomosis performed with PPH stapler. Our experiences after 88 cases

Ulcerative colitis (CU) or Familiar Polyposis (FAP) can be the indication for proctocolectomy reconstructed with J pouch. The complete removal of the colon mucosa is essential regarding the late complications and at the same time the atraumatic surgical technique is very important concerning on the long term functional results. Both aspects seems to be answered by the stapled ileo-anal anastomosis using a "procedure for prolaps and haemorrhoids (PPH)" stapler applied by us since 2000. 117 proctocolectomies reconstructed with J pouch and ileo-anal anastomosis were performed in our department between March 1990 and September 2016 indicated by CU or by FAP. In the first time period the ileo-anal anastomosis was sutured by hand (29 cases) and since 2000 the PPH stapler was applied as a routine (88 patients). Deviating ileostomy was performed in most cases of us. The data of the 117 patients were collected from the database of our hospital, 45 of them were interviewed personally and another 31 patients were contacted by phone, so 76 patients (65%) were eligible for follow-up. Frequency of stool, use of loperamid, level of incontinence (Wexner score) and perianal dermatitis were detected. The mean follow-up time was 18.6 years in the hand-sewn anastomosis group and 7.6 years in the PPH group. In the hand-sewn anastomosis group in 4/29 cases (13.8%) the removal of the pouch with definite ileostomy were necessary (2 pouchitis, 1 pouch necrosis, 1 recidiv rectum cancer); the mean stool frequency was 4.3 per day; the Wexner incontinence score was 8.5 and 2/15 patients (13.3%) live with ileostomy caused by incontinence. In the PPH stapled ileo-anal anastomosis group in 4/88 cases (4.5%) were the pouch removed (caused by pouchitis), the mean stool frequency was 4.0 per day; the Wexner score was 7.6 and 4/61 patients (6.6%) live with ileostomy caused by incontinence. Based on our experience the ileo-anal anastomosis performed by PPH stapler is technically feasible, seems to be effective concerning on the complete removal of the rectal mucosa and we observed better functional results compared with the hand-sewn anastomosis. Our data should be confirmed because of the low patients' volume.

Reversal of loop ileostomy under an Enhanced Recovery Programme – Is the stapled anastomosis technique still better than the handsewn technique?

IntroductionRecent literature suggests that stapled anastomotic (SA) technique for the reversal of loop ileostomy (LI) may be beneficial in terms of early recovery and reduced incidence of small bowel obstruction when compared to the handsewn anastomosis (HA). Enhanced Recovery Programme (ERP) after colorectal procedures has demonstrated a reduction in some aspects of surgical morbidity. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing reversal of LI within an ERP programme and compare the HA to the SA in relation to clinical outcomes. Material and methodsAll adult patients undergoing elective reversal of loop ileostomy between January 2008 and December 2012 without any additional procedures, were included in our study. Adherence to ERP modules and 30 day postoperative complications were assessed via retrospective review of patient case notes. ResultsOne hundred and eight patients had an ileostomy reversal; 61 in the SA and 47 in the HA group. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. ERP module compliance was satisfactory (>80%) in 11 of the 14 modules with no difference in individual module compliance between the two groups. The operating times were found to be comparable (p = 0.35). Overall mortality (p = 0.44), anastomotic leak rates (p = 1.00), intra-abdominal collections (p = 0.65), small bowel obstruction (p = 1.00), reoperation rates (p = 0.65), ileus (p = 0.14) and other significant complications (Clavien-Dindo > 2) (p = 0.08) were similar between the two groups. A significantly longer total length of hospital stay (TLOS) was found in the SA group (median 3 Vs 4 days, p = 0.009). ConclusionReversal of LI under an ERP appears to potentially neutralise the suggested SA benefits in terms of postoperative complications without any additional negative implications. Other non-operative factors may have a potential effect on outcomes such as the TLOS.

Effects of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy on the Likelihood of Sphincter Preservation Surgery in Locally Advanced Distal Rectal Cancer: A Longitudinal Study Based on Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

It is unclear whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) increases the rate of sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS), avoiding abdominoperineal resection (APR), for the treatment of distal rectal cancer. We examined whether pCRT increases the likelihood of SPS based on changes in tumor height using pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Between January 2009 and December 2013, 105 patients underwent long-course pCRT for locally advanced distal rectal cancer (≤5 cm from the anal verge) and were included in this study. The surgical procedures were analyzed in terms of radiologic findings, including the distance from the inferior margin of tumor to the superior margin of the anorectal ring (tumor height) measured by pelvic MRI before and after pCRT. Eighty-six (81.9 %) patients underwent SPS. Overall clinical downstaging occurred in 48 (45.7 %) patients. Tumor height increased significantly after pCRT (from 15.0 ± 15.3 to 18.1 ± 16.9 mm, change 3.1 ± 9.7 mm, p = 0.01). The mean change in tumor height was not significantly different between patients who underwent SPS or APR (mean change 3.3 ± 9.6 vs. 2.3 ± 10.5 mm, p = 0.68). The mean change was significantly greater in the double-stapled anastomosis group than in the handsewn anastomosis group (mean change 5.6 ± 9.9 vs. -0.6 ± 8.6 mm, p = 0.02). This was the first MRI-based longitudinal study to show that pCRT does not appear to increase the likelihood of SPS in locally advanced distal rectal cancer, although it could improve the potential of double-stapled anastomoses.