Hand Surgery Procedures Research Articles

Revision A1 Pulley Release: An Analysis of Risk Factors Using a National Database

Trigger finger release (TFR) is a commonly performed procedure in hand surgery. Trigger finger release has a high success rate, but recurrence can occur. Data on revision TFR (rTFR) are sparse, with little known regarding factors associated with the need for revision surgery. Our purpose was to analyze risk factors associated with rTFR procedures. Using a national database (PearlDiver Research Program), patients who underwent TFR between 2015 and 2022 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes. Patients were included if they received an ICD-10 diagnosis of trigger finger on the same day as their release or within 2 weeks of their procedure. Patients who underwent rTFR were determined through identification of a secondary procedure completed in the same digit on the ipsilateral hand performed after the index procedure. Revision rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were recorded. Demographics and comorbidities were categorically examined via univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A total of 46,613 patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified after TFR with 1,793 (3.85%) undergoing revision release. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and male sex were associated with statistically significantly increased odds of revision procedures at 1, 3, and 5 years from the initial operation. Age >65 years and hypertension were associated with an increased odds of revision surgery at 3 and 5 years, and carpal tunnel syndrome as a risk factor at 1 and 3 years only. Hypothyroidism was associated with a decreased revision rate at all time points and tobacco use at 5 years only. These data demonstrate that male sex, diabetes, and heart disease are risk factors for requiring revision TFR in the short and medium terms. This information can add to preoperative counseling with patients undergoing surgical treatment of trigger digits. Prognostic II.

UK Trainee Experience with WALANT - An Audit of 102 Cases.

Background: WALANT has gained much popularity in recent years, especially with COVID-19. However, a recent survey of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand membership (i.e. attendings/consultants) showed that only 17% were exposed to WALANT during residency or fellowship training. There is much interest in WALANT from trainees, but interpretation of the type and volume to be administered is highly varied. Methods: The aims of this study were (1) to survey a group of plastic surgery trainees in the UK about their knowledge of WALANT formulas, and (2) to compare trainee logbook records of WALANT procedures (if available) with published data from the UK. Results: All trainees were familiar with the 'standard' WALANT formula (1% lidocaine, 1:100,000 adrenaline ± 8.4% NaHCO3) described by Lalonde. However, because of local formularies, rather than 1:100,000 adrenaline, all used 1:200,000 adrenaline as it comes premixed in the UK. Other formulas used by UK trainees included 0.5% bupivacaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline, and mixing 1% lidocaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline with 1% lidocaine 1:1. In comparing available trainee WALANT records with published UK data, the average volume of WALANT used was 6.6 mls in the current study versus 12.9 mls for similar procedures (wound debridement and skin closure ± local flap, digital nerve repair, fingertip reconstruction, thenar injuries, phalangeal fracture and single digit extensor repair); specifically, for single digit flexor tendon repairs, this was 10 mls versus 16.3 mls. Conclusions: While the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) have developed official guidance for the use of WALANT in the UK, it appears there remains much variation in interpretation and hence, application. Comparison of trainee logbook records of common hand surgery procedures suggests that most can be done with much less WALANT administered than previously reported, with safe and reproducible results. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Discussion: An Analysis of Community-Level Socioeconomic Status Effects on Pricing Transparency and Variability of Hand Surgery Procedures.

Discussion: An Analysis of Community-Level Socioeconomic Status Effects on Pricing Transparency and Variability of Hand Surgery Procedures.

Cervical spine positioning patterns amongst hand surgeons: A critical analysis of surgical posture

AimThis study aims to assess the cervical spine positioning of consultant and trainee hand surgeons during standardised hand surgeries, focusing on the prevalence of sustained end-range postures, particularly cervical spine flexion. BackgroundSurgeons often perform procedures that require maintenance of sustained postures for prolonged periods of time. Hand surgeons may be at increased risk of sustained end of range postures, particularly cervical spine flexion. This can lead to strain on the musculoskeletal structures of the neck. Recent evidence suggests a higher incidence of neck dysfunction in hand surgeons, leading to an associated morbidity. MethodsWe examined hand surgeons of all experience levels during 40 common hand surgery procedures. We used real-time dynamic goniometric measurements of neck flexion using the “UPRIGHT GO 2” device and accompanying smartphone app. Neck flexion exceeding 40° was used as the threshold for defining an acceptable neck position. ResultsAnalysis included 20 total subjects at various levels of medical training (SHO n ​= ​6, Registrar n ​= ​9, Consultant n ​= ​5) performing surgeries under different conditions. Maladaptive neck positions were prevalent, with junior surgeons exhibiting such postures for 71 ​% of procedure time compared to 60 ​% for consultants. This underscores the potential contribution of sustained end-range postures to cervical spine dysfunction in hand surgeons, highlighting an early intervention opportunity. Notably, participants reported varied experiences with neck pain and expressed unanimous interest in integrating biofeedback posture devices into surgical training, with a single consultant expressing reservations.

Arthroscopy-assisted Procedures in Hand and Wrist Surgery: An Update. Where Are We So Far?

Wrist and hand arthroscopy, despite being an old tool, has gained popularity and advanced in assisting in the treatment of various injuries and conditions in the region in recent years. Dorsal, volar, ulnar, and radial accessory portals are used to reach all points of the carpal and hand joints. The minimal tissue damage, lesser injury to the capsule and its mechanoreceptors, the assessment of injuries associated with the reason for surgery, and aesthetically more favorable scars have attracted many doctors and their patients. As a result, there has been an increase in publications and diversifications of arthroscopic techniques. The aim of this update article is to present the advances and the evidence available in the literature to assist readers in their decision on which technique to use in the treatment of wrist and hand conditions.

A quality and readability comparison of artificial intelligence and popular health website education materials for common hand surgery procedures

IntroductionChatGPT and its application in producing patient education materials for orthopedic hand disorders has not been extensively studied. This study evaluated the quality and readability of educational information pertaining to common hand surgeries from patient education websites and information produced by ChatGPT. MethodsPatient education information for four hand surgeries (carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, Dupuytren’s contracture, and ganglion cyst surgery) was extracted from ChatGPT (at a scientific and fourth-grade reading level), WebMD, and Mayo Clinic. In a blinded and randomized fashion, five fellowship-trained orthopaedic hand surgeons evaluated the quality of information using a modified DISCERN criteria. Readability and reading grade level were assessed using Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) equations. ResultsThe Mayo Clinic website scored higher in terms of quality for carpal tunnel release information (p = 0.004). WebMD scored higher for Dupuytren’s contracture release (p < 0.001), ganglion cyst surgery (p = 0.003), and overall quality (p < 0.001). ChatGPT - 4th Grade Reading Level, ChatGPT - Scientific Reading Level, WebMD, and Mayo Clinic written materials on average exceeded recommended reading grade levels (4th–6th grade) by at least four grade levels (10th, 14th, 13th, and 11th grade, respectively). ConclusionsChatGPT provides inferior education materials compared to patient-friendly websites. When prompted to provide more easily read materials, ChatGPT generates less robust information compared to patient-friendly websites and does not adequately simplify the educational information. ChatGPT has potential to improve the quality and readability of patient education materials but currently, patient-friendly websites provide superior quality at similar reading comprehension levels.

Perioperative Use of Antibiotics as Infection Prophylaxis in Elective Wrist Arthroscopy: A Nationwide Survey

Wrist arthroscopy is a standard procedure in hand surgery for the diagnosis and treatment of wrist conditions. While perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is not generally recommended for elective hand surgery, there is no official standard for elective wrist arthroscopy. This study aimed to determine the actual clinical use of PAP in elective wrist arthroscopy in Germany and relate it to the structural conditions of clinics performing this procedure. We conducted a systematic search of all facilities in Germany offering wrist arthroscopy. Among these, we performed an online survey using the SoSci Survey online tool via email. PAP is more frequently administered in cases involving simultaneous bone procedures. Cephalosporins are the most commonly used antibiotics in cases of PAP administration. Hospitals administer PAP more frequently than outpatient settings, with most surveyed institutions following facility-specific internal standards for antibiotic administration. The number of arthroscopies performed in the surveyed centres does not influence antibiotic administration. The use of PAP in wrist arthroscopies in Germany is inconsistent. The increased use in arthroscopies with bone involvement corresponds to AWMF guidelines, but a general recommendation for wrist arthroscopies, including soft tissue arthroscopies, is necessary to provide physicians with medical and legal certainty.

Postoperative Benefits of Soft Tissue Wrist Arthroscopy: Retro- and Prospective Analyses of Outcome Measures.

Background: Elective soft-tissue-only wrist arthroscopy is a standard procedure in hand surgery for the diagnosis and treatment of wrist pain. A number of pathologies can be treated arthroscopically, with the aim of pain reduction and improved wrist mobility. A postinterventional evaluation of the treatment using objective and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) allows for an evidence-based statement about the benefits of soft-tissue-only wrist arthroscopy. Methods: A dual-center study combining retro- and prospective clinical analyses of patient outcomes after soft-tissue-only wrist arthroscopies was performed. The data were collected at two hospitals with departments specializing in hand surgery. The outcome was measured by assessing the range of motion of the wrist and its manual strength, as well as PROMs, including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Results: A total of 154 soft interventions met the study criteria and could be included. Seven months after the elective soft-tissue-only wrist arthroscopies, mobility improved significantly for active extension and flexion, as well as the ulnar and radial abduction of the wrist. The grip strength also improved significantly, by an average of 6 kg, during this period. The DASH score improved significantly, from 35 points to 14 points. Additionally, wrist pain at rest was reduced significantly. Conclusions: After elective soft-tissue-only wrist arthroscopy, patients showed an overall functional improvement in their wrist, with a significant reduction in pain and improvement of mobility and grip strength. This study emphasizes the importance of wrist arthroscopy as a successful treatment option for soft tissue pathologies of the wrist.

Wide-Awake Surgery and Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Rural Experience

Surgeons across all subspecialties had to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic to triage patients and steward hospital resources. Hand surgeons found themselves in a unique position to move some hospital-based procedures to a clinic-based setting, which has now impacted their post-pandemic practices. Performing procedures in the clinic using the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet technique is interestingly similar to minor-surgeries traditionally carried out in a general surgery clinic. By abstracting institutional case volumes from orthopedic, hand, and general surgery departments from 2019 to 2022, we identified trends that further support the potential for clinic-based procedures in hand surgery. This communication provides a foundation to compare cost and surgical indications for wide-awake local anesthesia across surgical disciplines.

A Review of 1228 In-Office Hand Surgery Procedures With Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) at a Single Private Practice.

This study examined the complication rate of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique in the clinic setting with field sterility at a single private practice. We hypothesized that WALANT is safe and effective with a low complication rate. This retrospective chart review included 1228 patients who underwent in-office WALANT hand procedures at a single private practice between 2015 and 2022. Patients were divided into groups based on type of procedure: carpal tunnel release, A1 pulley release, first dorsal compartment release, extensor tendon repair, mass excision, foreign body removal, and needle aponeurotomy. Patient demographics and complications were recorded; statistical comparisons of cohort demographics and risk factors for complications were completed, and P < .05 was considered significant for all statistical comparisons. The overall complication rate for all procedures was 2.77% for 1228 patients including A1 pulley release (n = 962, 2.7%), mass excision (n = 137, 3.7%), extensor tendon repair (n = 23, 4.3%), and first dorsal compartment release (n = 22, 8.3%). Carpal tunnel release, foreign body removal, and needle aponeurotomy groups experienced no complications. No adverse events (e.g. vasovagal reactions, digital ischemia, local anesthetic toxicity, inadequate vasoconstriction) were observed in any group. Patients with known autoimmune disorders and those who were currently smoking had a statistically significant higher complication rate. Office-based WALANT procedures with field sterility are safe and effective for treating common hand maladies and have a similar complication profile when compared to historical controls from the standard operating room in an ambulatory center or hospital.

13 years of hand surgery without an anesthesiologist. An analysis of efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The assistance of anaesthesiologist is considered an inseparable part of most surgical procedures, with the exception of a small proportion of minor procedures performed under local anaesthesia. In hand surgery, a vast majority of procedures, even those lasting several hours, can be carried out under regional (brachial plexus block) or local (infiltration) anaesthesia. These can be delivered by the surgeons themselves, allowing the surgeries to be carried out without the assistance of anesthesiologists.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists in the course of hand surgery procedures performed within the institution headed by the author of this article.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; The analysis was based on the records of anesthesia protocols filled out by the surgeons who delivered the anesthesia and who operated on the patients. The variables considered included the efficacy of anesthesia and the anesthesia-related adverse effects and complications.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Over a period of 13 years (2010-2022), a total of 24,703 surgeries were delivered; of these, 22,228 (91%) surgeries were carried out without anesthesiologists, with anesthesia being delivered by the surgeon him/herself. The efficacy of these procedures (local anasthesia and brachial plexus blocks combined) was 99%. A total of 631 (2.8%) anesthesia-related adverse reactions were recorded, most of them being transient, requiring immediate interventions and not leading to any serious sequelae. In only 17 cases (0.07%), adverse effects resulted in cancellation and rescheduling of the elective surgery.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Pre-surgical anesthesia as delivered prior to hand surgery procedures by the surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists is effective and safe while being associated with numerous benefits for patients, surgeons and the health care system's budget.&lt;/br&gt.

Description of WALANT technique in open bone and ligament wrist surgery

The gold-standard for bone, ligament and joint surgery in the wrist is locoregional anesthesia in most countries. Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) is commonly used for simple soft-tissue hand surgery procedures such as carpal tunnel or trigger finger release, and can now also be safely used in procedures such as proximal row carpectomy, scapholunate ligament repair or partial wrist fusion, to name but a few. This article describes the use of WALANT for complex surgery in the wrist. WALANT surgery offers many known benefits, such as enhanced patient safety and comfort, simplified perioperative process and avoidance of anesthesia-related risks, and also allows the surgeon to perform intraoperative testing of the repaired structures. Thus, the surgeon can tailor the rehabilitation program and shorten recovery time. We describe detailed guidelines for performing WALANT procedures safely and effectively, making it a favorable option for complex surgeries in the wrist.

Superficial Surgical Site Infection in Hand Surgery: A Cross- sectional Study in a Hand Surgery Unit

Introduction: Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) in hand surgery is generally considered to be less common. Infection of surgical site can lead to poor outcomes. Burden of surgical site infection in hand surgery has not been studied in our part of the world. We sought to determine the prevalence rate superficial surgical site infection in patients undergoing hand surgery. Methods: We used standard definition of CDC National Healthcare Surveillance Network (NHSN) criteria to evaluate 112 consecutive adults undergoing various hand surgery procedures outcome at the end of the second week for superficial SSI. The study was conducted over a period of six month (November 2022 to May 2023). Results: The prevalence of superficial surgical site infection was 6.25% . Among those affected 0.02% cases were diagnosed based on signs and symptoms criteria. In 0.03% patient the wound discharge yielded Staphylococcus aureus. The most common cause requiring hand surgery were workplace injuries, household injuries, and injuries due to road traffic accounting for 45.54%, 26.79%, and 18.75% , respectively. Crushing type of injury which was the most common of all mechanisms of injury. Conclusion: The prevalence rates of hand procedures are low but not negligible. This under-evaluated condition must be more extensively evaluated in a multicenter study involving larger population.

An Analysis of Community-Level Socioeconomic Status Effects on Pricing Transparency and Variability of Hand Surgery Procedures.

The hospital price transparency final rule requires hospitals to publish pricing information about provided items and services by means of 2 methods: (1) a comprehensive machine-readable file and (2) a display tool of selected shoppable services. Using machine-readable files on hospital websites, the authors examined trends in pricing transparency and variation in association with community-level socioeconomic factors for 3 common hand surgery procedures among Association of American Medical Colleges-affiliated hospitals. Available discount cash prices and payer-specific negotiated prices for CPT codes 64721, 26615, and 25111 were recorded. Multivariate analysis was used to stratify hospitals into 2 groups based on their area's median household income, percentage uninsured, and geographic practice cost index practice expense scores. Generalized linear mixed effects modeling was used to evaluate price variability against community-level financial characteristics of the patient population. Of hospitals that met selection criteria, a majority did not display discount cash prices and payer-specific negotiated prices for the 3 procedures. Hospitals in lower-income areas and areas with a higher percentage of the uninsured tended to charge a higher average payer-specific negotiated price for CPT code 25111. They also tended to have greater variation in payer-specific negotiated prices than hospitals found in higher-income and lower-percentage-uninsured areas. This study demonstrates that considerable pricing variation and incomplete transparency exists for CPT codes 64721, 26615, and 25111 among Association of American Medical Colleges-affiliated hospitals. Patients in lower-income and higher-percentage-uninsured areas are more exposed to a higher variability and average of negotiated prices than those in higher-income areas, which may translate to higher out-of-pocket costs for those with higher coinsurance and less socioeconomic prowess.

Carpal Tunnel Decompression Under Wide Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet Technique (WALANT): A Cost Effective and Outcome Analysis.

Introduction Wide-awake local anaesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique is cost-effective, resource-friendly, and safe. This can be used as an alternative to hand surgery procedures in outpatient units. It can be performed in clinics or operating rooms. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of WALANT for carpal tunnel decompression (CTD) over two years. Measured results include wound infections, relief of symptoms, paraesthesia, haematoma, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), hospital anxiety and depression scale score (HADS) and cost-effectiveness. Results Eighteen patients underwent CTDunder the WALANT technique over two years. VAS score was recorded at 3.1 ± 1.2 during the procedure and 1.67 ± 0.933 at two weeks follow-up. Persistent paraesthesia was found in only one patient at follow-up. Minimal bleeding was recorded during the procedure. No wound infections, revision surgery or post-operative haematoma formation were found. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was reported as 4.77 ± 2.1 after surgery. WALANT was also cost-effective, with an overall amount of £20. Conclusion Performing carpal tunnel decompression under WALANT in one stop upper limb clinic is a safe and cost-effective technique with no significant patient-related complications.

Utilization of a Clinic-Based Hand Surgery Procedure Room in the US Military Health System: A Performance Improvement Analysis of Resource Savings and Patient Satisfaction

Recent studies examining the implementation of clinic-based procedure rooms (PRs) for wide-awake hand surgery have reported cost reduction, decreased burden on hospital systems, and improved patient satisfaction. This study evaluates other resource savings, primarily time spent by patients in the hospital. Thirty-two patients were enrolled in a PR or the operating room group for prospective evaluation. Time spent in the hospital on the day of surgery, several preprocedure appointments, complications, and cost comparisons were evaluated between the two groups. Patient-reported outcomes were also evaluated with postoperative surveys assessing anxiety, pain, and satisfaction. Significant time savings were noted between the groups. The median time spent in the hospital on the day of surgery for the patients in the operating room group was 256 minutes versus 90 minutes for the PR group, a time savings of approximately 3 hours. Eight additional preoperative clinic visits for operating room patients were generated compared with no additional preoperative visits for PR patients. Cost savings for surgeries performed in the clinic-based procedure amounted to $232,411. No postoperative complications were observed in the clinic setting. Continued utilization of the clinical PR for select hand surgery procedures will reduce the cost and time burdens for procedures while maintaining satisfaction and safety. A clinic-based PR for performing minor hand surgeries saves the patient time and ostensibly allows the operating room to be used for more complex surgeries that are not easily amenable to a wide-awake in-clinic procedure.

Efficacy of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in elective soft-tissue-only wrist arthroscopy

Wrist arthroscopy is a standard procedure in hand surgery for diagnosis and treatment of wrist injuries. Even though not generally recommended for similar procedures, general administration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is still widely used in wrist arthroscopy. A clinical ambispective dual-centre study was performed to determine whether PAP reduces postoperative infection rates after soft tissue-only wrist arthroscopies. Retrospective and prospective data was collected at two hospitals with departments specialized in hand surgery. During the study period, 464 wrist arthroscopies were performed, of these 178 soft-tissue-only interventions met the study criteria and were included. Signs of postoperative infection and possible adverse drug effects (ADEs) of PAP were monitored. Additionally, risk factors for surgical site infection (SSIs), such as diabetes mellitus and BMI, were obtained. The overall infection rate of SSI was zero. Neither in the PAP group (n = 69) nor in the control group (n = 109) were signs of postoperative infection observed. Observed symptoms of ADEs were three-times higher in the PAP group when compared to the control-group (16.3 vs 5.5%; p = 0.043). No major ADEs were observed, but one in ten patients in the PAP group reported mild to severe intestinal or hypersensitivity symptoms. We demonstrate that the number needed to treat (NNT) with PAP to prevent one postoperative infection in soft-tissue arthroscopies of the wrist is > 109. Conversely, symptoms of ADEs were reported by one out of ten patients given PAP. Considering the high NNT to prevent postoperative infection and the large number of ADEs caused by PAP, we recommend not to use PAP routinely in soft-tissue arthroscopies of the wrist. Subsequent large-scale studies should be conducted to substantiate these results.

Main Operating Room Versus Field Sterility in Hand Surgery: A Review of the Evidence.

Introduction: Many of the guidelines that are generally accepted as main operating room best practices are not evidence based. They are based on the concept that if some sterility is good, more must be better. They are not derived from evidence-based sterility. Evidence-based sterility is the study of which of our various sterility practices increase or decrease our infection rates, as opposed to guidelines based on how many bacteria are in the operating room. Methods: This article adds the most important evidence we could find that is not included in the first paper on evidence-based sterility in hand surgery published in 2019. In this review, we also balance the evidence with common sense opinion. Results: The 21st century has seen a rapid rise in the number and reports of hand surgery procedures performed with field sterility outside the main operating room. There is now an abundance of good evidence to support that the rate of infection is not higher when many hand operations are performed with field sterility in minor procedure rooms. Conclusion: Moving hand surgery out of the main operating room to minor procedure rooms should be supported by healthcare providers. The higher cost, increased solid waste, and inconvenience of main operating room surgery are not justifiable for many procedures because it does not reduce the risk of postoperative infection.

Carbodiimide-Derivatized Synovial Fluid for Tendon Graft Coating Improves Long-Term Functional Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Reconstruction.

Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury is common in hand trauma, and flexor tendon reconstruction is one of the most challenging procedures in hand surgery because of severe adhesion that exceeds 25% and hinders hand function. The surface properties of a graft from extrasynovial tendons are inferior to those of the native intrasynovial FDP tendons, which has been reported as one of the major causations. Improved surface gliding ability of the extrasynovial graft is needed. Thus, this study used carbodiimide-derivatized synovial fluid and gelatin (cd-SF-gel) to modify the surface of the graft, thus improving functional outcomes using a dog in vivo model. Forty FDP tendons from the second and fifth digits of 20 adult women underwent reconstruction with a peroneus longus (PL) autograft after creation of a tendon repair failure model for 6 weeks. Graft tendons were either coated with cd-SF-gel ( n = 20) or not. Animals were euthanized 24 weeks after reconstruction, and digits were collected after the animals were euthanized for biomechanical and histologic analyses. Adhesion score (cd-SF-gel, 3.15 ± 1.53; control, 5 ± 1.26; P < 0.00017), normalized work of flexion (cd-SF-gel, 0.47 ± 0.28 N-mm/degree; control, 1.4 ± 1.45 N-mm/degree; P < 0.014), and distal interphalangeal joint motion (cd-SF-gel, 17.63 ± 6.77 degrees; control, 7.07 ± 12.99 degrees; P < 0.0015) in treated grafts all showed significant differences compared with nontreated grafts. However, there was no significant difference in repair conjunction strength between the two groups. Autograft tendon surface modification with cd-SF-gel improves tendon gliding ability, reduces adhesion formation, and enhances digit function without interfering with graft-host healing. The authors demonstrate a clinically relevant and translational technology by using the patient's own synovial fluid to "synovialize" an autologous extrasynovial tendon graft to improve functional outcomes following flexor tendon reconstruction.

Discrepancies in Work Relative Value Unit Assignment Based on Operative Time in Hand Surgery.

Work relative value units (wRVUs) are an intricate component of physician reimbursement determination in the United States. This paper assesses whether wRVUs appropriately consider operative time in hand surgery. The 50 most common single Current Procedural Terminology code hand surgery cases were queried from the 2013 to 2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The average assigned wRVUs and median operative times were calculated for each CPT. Linear regressions were calculated between operative time, wRVUs, and wRVUs per hour. Cases deviating the most from the expected wRVUs based on operative time were identified. In all, 46 800 cases comprising the top 50 most common hand surgery procedures were identified. Among these cases, the median (range) assigned operative time was 62 minutes (18-110), wRVUs were 7.5 (3.5-18.0), and wRVUs per hour was 8.3 (4.9-14.2). There was a positive linear correlation between operative time and wRVUs (R2 = 0.60). Each additional operative hour was associated with an additional 6.3 wRVUs (P < .001). Based on this relationship, the assigned wRVUs for included cases ranged from 59.7% to 172.6% of expected. There was a weak negative relationship between wRVUs per hour and operative time (R2 = 0.25). Cases shorter than 1 hour had more wRVUs per hour than those longer than 1 hour (10.0 vs. 8.1, P = .003). However, this relationship disappeared when considering case turnover. This study suggests a moderately strong positive correlation between wRVUs and operative time in hand surgery. Yet, numerous outliers from this trend exist, suggesting some discrepancies in reimbursement.