Hand Sewn Research Articles

Intestinal Anastomosis During Enterostomy Takedown Using a 5 mm Miniature Endostapler Compared to Conventional Handsewn Technique

AimEnterostomy takedown is common in neonates with Hirschsprung’s disease, anorectal malformations, or necrotizing enterocolitis. Stapled bowel anastomosis has become routine in adults, but size of up to 12 mm diameter precludes performing enterostomy takedown in young infants using regular intestinal staplers. After the introduction of miniature (5 mm diameter) staplers, we increasingly used them for enterostomy takedown. This study compares enterostomy takedown using the miniature stapler (MS) to the conventional hand-sewn (HS) technique. MethodsRetrospective review of all children <3 years of age undergoing enterostomy closure at our institution from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, operative times, complications, and outcomes were compared between those who underwent the procedure using MS versus HS technique. Data are quoted as median (range). ResultsA total of 102 patients were enrolled, including MS (n = 26) and HS (n = 76) anastomoses. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, or indication for enterostomy. Enterostomy takedown using MS was faster [82.5 (44–218) versus 147 (52–381) minutes, p < 0.001) and associated with earlier commencement of feedings [2 (1–6) versus 4 (1–24) days, p = 0.001], as well as shorter length-of-stay [6 (2–20) versus 17 (3–52) days, p < 0.001), compared to the HS technique. ConclusionsThis is the first study that systematically evaluates the novel 5 mm ministapler for enterostomy takedown in young children. Its use was associated with quicker operative times, earlier feeding and shorter hospital stay. These findings are especially relevant in children with co-morbidities who do not tolerate longer anesthesia times. Randomized, controlled trials should be performed to prospectively confirm these findings. Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.

553. CIRCULAR STAPLED CERVICAL ESOPHAGO-GASTROSTOMY, A VALUABLE OPTION AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE MCKEOWN ESOPHAGECTOMY?

Abstract Background The optimal choice of anastomotic technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy remains unclear. The incidence of cervical anastomotic leak after esophagectomy can be up to 30%, which is the highest among all types of gastrointestinal anastomosis. Anastomotic stricture is another complication that can decrease the postoperative quality of life with an incidence of 9.1–46.0%. Few studies directly compared circular stapled (CS) and hand sewn (HS) cervical esophago-gastric anastomosis, with mixed results. We aim to compare the two techniques in a pre-post cohort study. Methods Medical record of all patients that underwent minimally invasive subtotal esophagectomy and cervical esophago-gastrostomy in our institution from January 2018 to January 2024 were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. We routinely performed hand sawn anastomoses until February 2022, then switched to circular stapled, with the aim of reducing the incidence of anastomotic leaks. We compared clinical data of patients who received hand sewn cervical anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis. Primary endpoints were anastomotic leaks and strictures. Results We identified 101 patients who met the inclusion criteria. HS anastomosis was performed in 67 patients, while 34 received CS anastomosis. Anastomotic leak rate was 22.4% in the HS group and 8.8% in the CS group (OR 0.34, p=0.092). Anastomotic stricture rate was 26.9% in the HS group and 14.7% in the CS group (OR 0.47, p=0.17). Median length of stay was 18 (IQR 15-22) days in the HS group and 13.5 (IQR 12-14.5) days in the CS group (p=0.001). Severe complication rate (CD&amp;gt;2) was 16.4% in the HS group and 11.8% in the CS group (OR 0.68, p=0.53). Conclusions In our experience, the introduction of circular stapled cervical esophago-gastrostomy was feasible and safe, and resulted in a lower incidence of anastomotic leak and stricture compared to hand sewn anastomosis, though not statistically significant, possibly because of the small sample size. No difference in other major postoperative outcomes was observed. We found cervical CS anastomosis a reliable, reproducible and technically less demanding procedure, even for very high esophageal cancers. We believe that this anastomotic technique could spread even in Western countries where it has hardly ever been explored.

465. INNOVATION TO STANDARDIZATION OF THORACOLAPAROSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY: CULMINATION OF THREE DECADES OF EXPERIENCE

Abstract Minimally invasive esophagectomy has seen a great deal of evolution over the last three decades. As one of the earliest adopters of minimally invasive approach for esophagectomy, we present our experience and the lessons we have learnt in over 1300 cases. We adopted the prone position and later modified to mid prone position for the thoracic phase of esophagectomy. This position has several advantages of better exposure due to gravity aided retraction of the lungs, clear operating field as blood trickles away as well as feasibility of rapid conversion to open thoracotomy in emergencies. A major transformation in our surgery was the technical modifications and the extent of mediastinal lymphadenectomy. With refinements in technique and greater understanding of the lymphatic spread, we evolved from standard to extended and even total mediastinal lymphadenectomy improving the oncological outcomes without increasing the operative morbidity. The mean total lymph node yield is over 35. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was noted in 7% of cases. The technique of anastomosis was also extensively modified from hand sewn to circular stapler to semi mechanical and finally fully mechanical side to side anastomosis using triangulation technique. The triangulation technique has led to significant reduction in leak rates to less than 5% and stricture formation (&amp;lt;1%). Finally, our innovative railroading technique for specimen extraction through the neck is oncologically safe that avoids large incisions in the chest or abdomen. The 30 day mortality rate is less than 1%

Reconstruction Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Cancer: Insights From the GastroBenchmark and GASTRODATA databases.

Various anastomotic and reconstruction techniques are used for minimally invasive total (miTG) and distal gastrectomy (miDG). Their effects on postoperative morbidity have not been extensively studied. MiTG and miDG patients were selected from 9356 oncological gastrectomies performed in 2017-2021 in 43 centers. Endpoints included anastomotic leakage (AL) rate and postoperative morbidity tested by multivariable analysis. Three major anastomotic techniques [circular stapled (CS); linear stapled (LS); and hand sewn (HS)], and 3 major bowel reconstruction types [Roux (RX); Billroth I (BI); Billroth II (BII)] were identified in miTG (n=878) and miDG (n=3334). Postoperative complications, including AL (5.2% vs 1.1%), overall (28.7% vs 16.3%), and major morbidity (15.7% vs 8.2%), as well as 90-day mortality (1.6% vs 0.5%) were higher after miTG compared with miDG. After miTG, the AL rate was higher after CS (4.3%) and HS (7.9%) compared with LS (3.4%). Similarly, major complications (LS: 9.7%, CS: 16.2%, and HS: 12.7%) were lowest after LS. Multivariate analysis confirmed anastomotic technique as a predictive factor for AL, overall, and major complications. In miDG, AL rate (BI: 1.4%, BII 0.8%, and RX 1.2%), overall (BI: 14.5%, BII: 15.0%, and RX: 18.7%), and major morbidity (BI: 7.9%, BII: 9.1%, and RX: 7.2%), and mortality (BI: 0%, BII: 0.1%, and RY: 1.1%%) were not affected by bowel reconstruction. In oncologically suitable situations, miDG should be preferred to miTG, as postoperative morbidity is significantly lower. LS should be a preferred anastomotic technique for miTG in Western Centers. Conversely, bowel reconstruction in DG may be chosen according to the surgeon's preference.

Medium and long-term patency results of distal anastomosis connectors: a meta-analysis.

The difficulty of suturing perfect anastomoses in limited-access conditions prevents the transition of traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to sternal-sparing approaches, even in the robotic era. Automated coronary anastomotic connector technologies may address these difficulties, but to date, none have achieved broad adoption. Besides versatility, ease-of-use and cost-effectiveness, the key performance parameter of such technology is anastomotic patency. In this meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate published connector devices by examining their patency outcomes in distal anastomoses. The literature was systematically searched for studies comparing the angiographic patency of connector constructed coronary anastomoses to handsewn (HS) connections in adult patients undergoing CABG. The primary outcome was anastomosis patency across early (<30 days), mid-term (30 days to 1 year) and long-term (>1 year) follow-up. Random-effects meta-analyses were employed to analyze and compare patency using pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The search yielded 14 studies concerning eight connector devices. In 4,311 patients, a total of 4,328 anastomoses were constructed, 674 with connector devices and 3,654 with a HS technique. The pooled device patency over all timeframes was non-inferior to the HS technique (RR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.56-1.44). Technologies having a relatively large blood-exposed non-intimal surface area (BENIS, >15 mm2) performed acceptably when applied to large target vessels [>2.0-2.5 mm inner diameter (ID)]. A tiny anastomotic orifice area (AOA, < ca. 4 mm2) appeared to adversely affect results. Technologies realizing a generous AOA in combination with a limited BENIS showed superior results and applicability by performing well across the entire range of target coronary artery diameters (>1.0-1.5 mm ID). The overall results suggest that connectors yield at least non-inferior anastomosis patency outcomes compared to HS techniques in all observed timeframes. Optimizing device characteristics like BENIS and AOA appear fundamental for broad applicability.

Efficacy and Safety between Stapled Versus Hand Sewn Anastomosis in Anterior Resection for Carcinoma of Rectum

Efficacy and Safety between Stapled Versus Hand Sewn Anastomosis in Anterior Resection for Carcinoma of Rectum

A Comparative Study between Stapler and Hand Sewn Anastomosis in Elective Gastrointestinal Surgery in a Tertiary Care Centre

A Comparative Study between Stapler and Hand Sewn Anastomosis in Elective Gastrointestinal Surgery in a Tertiary Care Centre

Reconstruction Techniques and Associated Morbidity after Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Cancer – Insights from the GastroBenchmark and GASTRODATA databases

Abstract Background Various anastomotic and reconstruction techniques are used to restore intestinal continuity after minimally invasive total (TG) and subtotal distal gastrectomy (DG). Aims Their effects on anastomotic leakage and postoperative morbidity have not been extensively studied. Methods Patients after minimally invasive TG and DG were selected from a cohort of 9356 oncological gastrectomies performed between 2017-2021 in 44 specialized centers. Results Three anastomotic techniques (circular stapled (CS, 3.7%); linear stapled (LS, 93.8%); hand sewn (HS, 2.5%)) and three types of bowel reconstruction (Roux (RX, 51.5%); Billroth I (BI, 23.1%); Billroth II (BII, 25.4%)) were identified after TG (n=878) and DG (n=3334). Postoperative morbidity was higher after TG compared to DG (AL 5.2% vs. 1.1%, p≤0.001; 90-day mortality 1.6% vs. 0.4%, p≤0.001; overall morbidity 28.6% vs. 16.3%, p≤0.001; major morbidity 15.4% vs. 8.0%, p≤0.001). Anastomotic leakage rate in the TG cohort was higher after CS (13.1%) and HS (7.9%) than after LS anastomoses (1.9%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Similarly, overall (CS: 43.9%, HS: 28.6%, LS: 23.1%) and major complications rates (CS: 25.2%, HS: 11.1%, LS: 12.0%) as well as mortality (CS: 4.7%, HS: 2.2%, LS: 0.8%) were higher after CS. Multivariate analysis confirmed anastomotic technique as a predictive factor for anastomotic leakage (Fig. 1), but not for occurrence of mortality, overall and major complications. In the DG cohort, most (98.7%), outcomes were similar for all types of bowel reconstruction: Anastomotic leakage (BI: 1.4%, BII 0.8%, RX 1.2%, p=0.440), 90-day mortality (BI: 0%, BII 0.1%, RY: 1.1%%, p=0.109), overall (BI: 14.5%, BII: 15.0%, RX: 18.7%, p=0.208) and major morbidity (BI: 7.9%, BII: 9.1%, RX: 7.2%, p=0.219). Conclusion In suitable situations, DG should be preferred to TG, as postoperative morbidity is significantly lower. In addition, LS should be the preferred method of anastomosis after TG. Conversely, the techniques for bowel reconstruction can be chosen according to the surgeon's preference.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome following Trans-Anal Total Mesorectal Excision.

Trans-anal total mesorectal excision (Ta-TME) is a novel approach for the resection of rectal cancer. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent functional disorder that might follow restorative proctectomy. Data regarding bowel function after Ta-TME are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the development of LARS following Ta-TME. A prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent Ta-TME for rectal cancer at our institution was reviewed. All patients who were operated on from January 2018 to December 2021 were evaluated. The LARS score questionnaire was used via telephone interviews. Incidence, severity and risk factors for LARS were evaluated. Eighty-five patients underwent Ta-TME for rectal cancer between January 2018 and December 2021. Thirty-five patients were excluded due to ostomy status, death, local disease recurrence, ileal pouch or lack of compliance. Fifty patients were included in the analysis. LARS was diagnosed in 76% of patients. Anastomosis distance from dentate line was identified as a risk factor for LARS via multivariate analysis (p = 0.042). Neo-adjuvant therapy, hand sewn anastomosis and anastomotic leak did not increase the risk of LARS. LARS is a frequent condition following ta-TME, as it is used for other approaches to low anterior resection. Anastomosis distance from dentate line is an independent risk factor for LARS. In this study neo-adjuvant therapy, hand sewn anastomosis and anastomotic leak did not increase the risk of LARS. Further studies with longer follow-up times are required to better understand the functional outcomes following Ta-TME.

The “double-fired” gastro-jejunostomy as a form of improved efficiency during Whipple procedure

BackgroundGastro-jejunostomy (GJ) after pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is most commonly performed in a hand-sewn fashion. Intestinal stapled anastomosis are reported to be as effective as hand-sewn in terms of patency and risk of leakage in other indications. However, the use of a stapled gastro-jejunostomy hasn't been fully assessed in PD. The aim of the present technical report is to evaluate functional outcomes of stapled GJ during PD, its associated effect on operative time and related complications. MethodsThe institutional database for pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was retrospectically reviewed. Pylorus resecting open PD without vascular or multivisceral resections were considered for the analysis. The incidence of clinically significant delayed gastric emptying (DGE from the International Stufy Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) grade B and C), other complications, operative time and overall hospitalization were evaluated. ResultsOver a 10-years study period, 1182 PD for adenocarcinoma were performed and recorded in the database. 243 open Whipple procedures with no vascular and with no associated multivisceral resections were available and constituted the study population. Hand-sewn (HS) anastomosis was performed in 175 (72 %), stapled anastomosis (St) in 68 (28 %). No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups, with the exception of a higher rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the HS group (74 % St vs. 86 % HS, p = 0.025). Intraoperatively, a significantly reduced median operative time in the St group was observed (248 min St vs. 370 mins HS, p < 0.001). Post-operatively, rates of clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (7 % St vs. 14 % HS, p = 0.140), clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (10 % St, 15 % HS, p = 0.300), median length of stay (7 days for each group, p = 0.289), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (4.4 % St vs. 6.3 % HS, p = 0.415) and complication rate (22 % St vs. 34 % HS, p = 0.064) were similar between groups. However, readmission rates were significantly lower after St GJ (13.2 % St vs 29.7 % HS, p = 0.008). ConclusionOur results indicate that a stapled GJ anastomosis during a standard Whipple procedure is non-inferior to a hand-sewn GJ, with a comparable rate of DGE and no increase of gastrointestinal related long term complications. Further, a stapled GJ anastomosis might be associated with reduced operative times.

Impact of zero anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy followed by whole stomach reconstruction for esophageal cancer: prospective cohort study.

The stomach is the most common organ which is used for reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. It is controversial which is better narrow gastric tube reconstruction or whole stomach reconstruction to prevent anastomotic leakage. From August 2022 to March 2023, we started a prospective cohort study of whole stomach reconstruction after esophagectomy. Until then (from January 2018 to July 2022), narrow gastric tube reconstruction was performed as a standard reconstruction. Narrow gastric tube reconstruction and whole stomach reconstruction were performed in 183 patients and 20 patients, respectively. The patient's characteristics were not significantly different between the narrow gastric tube group and the whole stomach group. In particular, for all patients in the whole stomach reconstruction group, retrosternal route and esophagogastrostomy by hand sewn were applied. There were no occurrences of AL through the continuous 20 cases in the whole stomach group, otherwise 42 (22.9%) patients in the narrow gastric group (P = 0.016). Postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the whole stomach group than in the narrow gastric group (21days vs. 28days, P < .001). Blood perfusions were evaluated by indocyanine green for all cases, which had very good blood perfusion in all cases. Additionally, quantitative blood perfusion was examined by SPY-QP (Stryker, USA) for one case. Even the edge of the fornix showed more than 90% blood perfusion levels when the antrum was fixed as the reference point. Whole stomach reconstruction with excellent blood perfusion is considered to be safe and has the possibility to prevent from occurring AL after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients.

The Use of Thread and Fabric in Feminist Zines

The Use of Thread and Fabric in Feminist Zines

OGC V04 Reconstruction using linear side to side stapled anastomosis following robotic total gastrectomy

Abstract Background Worldwide, gastric cancer is the third most common cause of mortality and is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer. Minimally invasive surgery using the robotic platform to perform gastrectomy, is gaining popularity worldwide. It allows for better vision, dexterity, better ergonomics for the surgeon, reduced blood loss and lesser pain. Various anastomotic techniques have been suggested including circular stapler, hand sewn, Pi shaped linear stapler anastomosis. We demonstrate our technique performing a robotic side to side linear stapled anastomosis following total gastrectomy. Methods We detail the steps involved in the procedure, including trocar placement, necessary robotic instruments, and surgical description. 56 year old male patient with a BMI of 40 and PS 1, underwent robotic total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for mid body diffuse adenocarcinoma. Preoperatively staging investigations included endoscopy, staging laparoscopy, computerised tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET). Fitness was assessed using cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Results Patient spend one night in high dependency unit, and was stepped down to ward based care. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was followed. There were no complications and patient was discharged after 10 days. Conclusions We demonstrate a safe technique for performing side to side linear anastomosis following robotic total gastrectomy.

OGC V05 Robotic intrathoraxic linear stapled anastomosis following Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy

Abstract Background Ivor lewis oesophagectomy (ILO) for oesophageal cancer (OC) is associated with high morbidity with an anastomotic leak (AL) rate of upto 30% been quoted in literature. This can lead to return to intensive care, delayed recovery and mortality. Several techniques have been developed in an attempt to reduce this risk such as, hand sewn technique, circular anastomosis and side to side linear stapled anastomosis (LSA). Recent meta-analysis suggested reduced AL with LSA. We demonstrate our technique for a totally robotic side to side LSA performed for distal OC. Methods We detail the steps involved in the procedure, including trocar placement, necessary robotic instruments, and surgical description. 74 year old male patient with a BMI of 30 and performance status of 1, underwent robotic ILO for a Siewert type 1 T2N1 distal oesophageal adenocarcinoma after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Preoperatively staging investigations included endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, computerised tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET). Fitness was assessed using cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Results Patient was on the high dependency unit as per our routine practice for less than 24 hours and was transferred to our monitored ward bed. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was followed. There were no complications and patient was discharged in 8 days following ILO. Conclusions We demonstrate our technique using side to side LSA for robotic ILO.

Digestive cancer surgery in low-mid income countries: analysis of postoperative mortality and complications in a single-center study.

This study aimed to analyze postoperative and 90-day morbidity and mortality and their risk factors in all digestive cancer curative intent resections of a single digestive surgical department in a low-mid income country. All consecutive patients who underwent a surgical resection for digestive cancer with a curative intent between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021, were included. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cancer surgery database managed during the period. Patterns and factors associated with increased morbidity and mortality were analyzed and presented in tabular and descriptive forms. Seventy-six patients were included, 38 (50%) were men with a mean age of 59 years (±13.5). Forty patients (52.63%) had tumors locally advanced, staged CT3-CT4 on preoperative imagery. Thirty-three of our population (43.42%) had laparoscopic surgery (conversion rate at 12.12%). In immediate preoperative, the morbidity rate was 36.84%; among each, 7 patients (9.21%) had serious complications (>2 Clavien-Dindo grade), and mortality rate was 5.26%. At 90 days after surgery, morbidity remained the same, and mortality increased to 7.9%. Risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality were female gender, obesity, high levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, hypoalbuminemia, laparotomy approach, hand sewn anastomosis, prolonged operating time, and wide drainage (p < 0.05). This study provides figures on mortality and morbidity related to digestive cancer curative surgery in a low-mid income country digestive department and discusses risk factors increasing postoperative complications and death.

Does the age of ulcerative colitis diagnosis impact outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy?

Ulcerative colitis (UC) can be diagnosed at a variety of different ages. We evaluated if age of ulcerative colitis (UC) diagnosis impacts outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). A prospectively maintained pouch database (1983-2020) was queried to identify patients undergoing an RP for UC. The cohort was stratified based on bimodal disease presentation into 2 groups: the early adulthood group (19-30years old) and the mid/late adulthood group (40-70years old). Patients' demographics, postoperative complications, functional (stool number, seepage), and quality of life (QoL) rates were compared between the groups. A total of 628 patients with an age range of 19-30years old (18.1 ± 2.2 at the time of diagnosis, 24.2 ± 10.5 at the time of IPAA) and 706 patients with an age range of 40-70years old (45 ± 3.0 at time of diagnosis, 52.3 ± 9.4 at time of IPAA) were identified. Older patients had longer disease duration, higher BMI, lower biologic use, and greater one-/two-staged IPAA, with 20% hand sewn anastomosis and 16.5% of S pouch configuration compared to younger ones. No difference was observed in anastomotic separation, pelvic sepsis, fistulas, or pouch failure in follow-up. Postoperatively, older patients more frequently developed bowel obstructions, strictures, and pouchitis, in addition to higher rates of seepage (p < 0.05). QoL was comparable between groups. While IPAA retention rates are comparable between different age cohorts, older age at diagnosis and IPAA construction is associated with higher rates of pouchitis, bowel obstruction, anastomotic strictures, and worse functional outcome. Quality of life is similar in those who retain their ileal pouch on the long-term.

Evaluation of the outcome of linear stapler anastomosis in comparison to hand-sewn anastomosis in elective loop transverse colostomy closure in children: a study in a tertiary care hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Background: Conventional hand suture technique of intestinal anastomosis has been in vogue for decades. Staplers which developed to simplify surgery began to have significant impact. Objective were to see outcome of linear stapler anastomosis in comparison to hand-sewn anastomosis in elective loop transverse colostomy closure in children. Methods: This prospective interventional study was carried out in the department of pediatric surgery, Dhaka medical college hospital, Dhaka from January 2018 to December 2019 over a period of 2 years. Forty-seven patients who underwent loop transverse colostomy closure were included in this study. Patients were allocated by purposive sampling into two groups, group A (linear stapler anastomosis) and group B (hand-sewn anastomosis). Results: Mean age of the patients were 5.79±3.23 years and 4.21±3.13 years in linear stapler anastomosis group and hand-sewn anastomosis group respectively. Male to female ratio was 1.2:1 in linear stapler anastomosis group and 5.25:1 in hand-sewn anastomosis group. The mean duration of return of bowel movements (passage of flatus after surgery) in linear stapler method was 32.82±6.04 hours and in hand sewn method was 40.56±5.35 hours (p&lt;0.05). Oral feeding was started earlier in patients who underwent linear stapler anastomosis (3.18±0.39 days), as compared to hand-sewn anastomosis (4.16±0.37 days) (p≤0.001). The mean cost in linear stapler method was Tk. 4072±158 and in hand sewn method was Tk. 1440±362. Anastomotic leakage was lower (4.5%) in linear stapler anastomosis than that in hand-sewn anastomosis (20.0%) (p&gt;0.05). Conclusions: Stapling technique can be used safely and effectively as a part of modern Surgeon`s armory and one should be equally expert with stapler guns as with needle holders and sutures.

Stapled side-to-side anastomosis for ileostomy reversal: a simple and reproducible technique with video.

Protective diverting ileostomy is commonly performed in rectal surgery to avoid septic complications of low colorectal anastomosis. Ileostomy closure usually occurs three months after the surgery and can be realized in two ways: hand sewn or stapled. Existing randomized studies comparing the two techniques showed no difference in terms of complications. Our study describes the standard technique of ileostomy reversal as done in Bordeaux University Hospital in 10 steps individually illustrated and with an explicative video. We also collected data concerning the 50 last patients who underwent an ileostomy reversal in our center from June 2021 to June 2022. Mean duration of the ileostomy closure was 46.8 minutes, and the mean total hospital stay was 4.66 days. Five of 50 (10%) patients had a post-operative bowel obstruction, 2/50 (4%) patients had a post-operative bleeding, 1/50 (2%) patient had a wound infection, and there was no anastomotic leakage observed. Stapled side-to-side anastomosis is a rapid, simple, and reproducible technique for ileostomy reversal. There are no more complications compared to hand-sewn anastomosis. It engenders an additional cost compensated by the gain in operating time which altogether saves money.

Laparoscopic repair of duodenal atresia using ministapler: Initial experience

• This study shows recent results of duodenal atresia repair by minimal invasive surgery using mini stapler vs laparoscopic hand sewn anastomosis in a tertiary hospital. • Duodenal atresia repair using ministapler for side to side DD anastomosis could make a challenging procedure more simple and reproducible in less expert hands.

A comparative study of single layer versus double layer small bowel anastomosis

Background: There are various gastrointestinal surgeries in which we require small bowel anastomosis. Bowel anastomosis is quite common in different bowel pathology. Bowel anastomosis can be done by hand sewn or y stapler. In hand sewn anastomosis, we can do single layer or double layer anastomosis. Method: The study was carried out in 50 patients between August 2019 to March 2020. In this study, we have included all the patients who require small bowel end to end anastomosis in either elective surgeries or emergency surgeries. Patients who require proximal stoma formation and other than small bowel anastomosis are excluded. In present study, patients were randomly allocated in two groups: group A (n=25) includes single layer(interrupted) hand sewn bowel anastomosis and group B two layer (Connell and seromuscular) handsewn bowel anastomosis. Author have compared two groups in terms of intraoperative time and postoperative leak. Results: This shows that there is significantly reduce in intraoperative time in group A patient while there is no significant difference in postoperative complication or postoperative leak between two groups. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in single layer and double layer technique of bowel anastomosis.