Hand-foot Skin Reaction Research Articles

Cutaneous adverse events to systemic antineoplastic therapies: a retrospective study in a public oncologic hospital

BackgroundMucocutaneous adverse events are common during anticancer treatment, with variable consequences for the patient and their therapeutic regimen. ObjectiveTo evaluate the most common adverse events, as well as the drugs associated with their appearance and the consequences for cancer treatment. MethodsA retrospective study was carried out through the analysis of patients treated at the Clinical Dermatology Unit of a public oncologic hospital. ResultsA total of 138 patients with 200 adverse events were evaluated. The most commonly identified adverse events were nail and periungual changes (20%), papulopustular eruptions (13%), acneiform eruptions (12%), hand-foot syndrome (6.5%), hand-foot skin reaction (6%), and xerosis (6%). The most frequently associated antineoplastic treatment groups were classical chemotherapy (46.2%), target therapy (32.3%), and other non-antineoplastic drugs used in neoplasia protocols (16.5%). Of the total number of patients, 17.4% had their treatment suspended or changed due to a dermatological adverse event. Study limitationsRetrospective study and analysis of patients who were referred for specialized dermatological examination only, not allowing the assessment of the actual incidence of adverse events. ConclusionA wide variety of dermatological manifestations are secondary to antineoplastic treatment with several different drugs resulting, not rarely, in the interruption or modification of therapeutic regimens.

Utility of cooling patches to prevent hand-foot syndrome caused by pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUNDPegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) uses the hydrophilic layer of liposomes to reach the sweat on the skin surface or accumulate in the sweat glands, producing toxic free radicals and oxidative damage, resulting in hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Regional cooling can induce vasoconstriction to reduce the release of drugs in the limbs and reduce the accumulation of drugs in sweat glands; thus, decreasing the incidence and severity of HFS.AIMTo study the efficacy of cooling patches to prevent HFS caused by PLD in the short-term.METHODSThis is a retrospective cohort study. Female breast cancer patients (n = 101) who were treated with PLD in two breast wards at our department from February 2020 to February 2021 were enrolled in the study and were randomly divided into the cooling group (51 patients) and the control group (50 patients). Patients in the control group only received routine care, while the patients in the cooling group applied cooling patches, based on routine care, to the palm and back of the hands 15 min before chemotherapy infusion for 10 h. All patients took a corresponding dose of dexamethasone orally one day before chemotherapy, on the day of chemotherapy, and one day after chemotherapy. SPSS23.0 version was used to analyze the data in this study. The occurrence and severity of HFS was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test, and scores were analyzed by the Student’s t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A P value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.RESULTSIn this study, neither group of patients developed Grade 3 HFS. In the control group, the incidence of Grade 1 HFS and Grade 2 HFS was 38% and 2%, respectively. However, in the cooling group, only one person developed Grade 1 HFS (2%), and none of the patients developed Grade 2 HFS. These findings showed that cooling patches can effectively reduce the frequency and severity of HFS (P < 0.0001) in the short-term. Before the fourth chemotherapy cycle, although general self-efficacy scale scores in the cooling group were low, they were still significantly higher than those in the control group (17.22 ± 5.16 vs 19.63 ± 6.42, P = 0.041). Compared with the control group, the mean Hand-Foot Skin Reaction and Quality of Life Questionnaire score in the cooling group was significantly lower (18.08 ± 7.01 vs 14.20 ± 7.39, P = 0.008).CONCLUSIONCooling patches can effectively reduce the frequency and severity of HFS caused by PLD in the short-term. In addition, it may help delay the decline in patients’ self-efficacy.

Expert consensus on the management of adverse events in patients receiving lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Lenvatinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor approved for use as first‐line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, like other agents in this drug class, lenvatinib is associated with clinically important adverse events (AEs) that could adversely affect patient outcomes. Hypertension, diarrhea, decreased appetite/weight, hand–foot skin reaction, and proteinuria are among the most common AEs associated with lenvatinib therapy. This article provides strategies for the effective management of lenvatinib‐associated AEs based on the expert opinion of authors and currently available literature. Due to the high risk of AEs in patients receiving lenvatinib, prophylactic measures and regular monitoring for AEs are recommended. Lenvatinib dose interruption, adjustment, or discontinuation of treatment may be required for patients who develop AEs. For grade 1 or 2 AEs, dose interruption is generally not required. For persistent or intolerable grade 2 or 3 AEs, lenvatinib treatment should be interrupted until symptoms improve/resolve to grade 0–1 or baseline levels. Thereafter, treatment should be resumed at the same or a lower dose. Disease progression may occur in patients who do not initially respond to treatment or receive a suboptimal lenvatinib dose following dose reduction, resulting in lack of efficacy. Therefore, to derive maximum treatment benefit and ensure long‐term disease control, lenvatinib should be maintained at the highest possible dose when managing AEs. To conclude, lenvatinib‐associated AEs can be managed with prophylactic measures, regular monitoring and symptomatic management, which can ensure continued treatment and maximum survival benefit in patients with advanced HCC receiving first‐line lenvatinib therapy.

CTNI-50. REGORAFENIB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS: A LARGE REAL-LIFE EXPERIENCE

Abstract INTRODUCTION Regorafenib (REG), an oral multikinase inhibitor, showed benefit in recurrent GBM (recGBM) patients in the REGOMA trial. We investigated the clinical outcome and safety of REG in a real-life population of recGBM patients treated at Veneto Institute of Oncology as off-label use. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients receiving REG were entered prospectively on a clinical database. Data were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. The major inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed diagnosis of GBM, disease progression by RANO criteria after Stupp protocol, ECOG PS ≤ 2. Patients received REG 160 mg per day for the first 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival, RANO criteria for radiological assessment, CTCAE v5.0 for drug related adverse events. RESULTS 54 patients were enrolled: median age was 56, ECOG PS 0-1 in 91%, MGMTmet in 53%, second surgery at the time of relapse in 30%. Median follow-up was 11.1ms, 30 PTS (56%) had died and 50 PTS (93%) had progressed. MedianOS was 10.2 ms (95%CI, 6.4-13.9), 12m-OS was 43%; medianPFS was 2.3 ms (95%CI, 1.3-3.3) and 6m-PFS was 18%. Disease control rate (DCR) was 46.3%; stable disease was reported in 38.8% and partial response in 7.4%. Age, MGMT and corticosteroid use at baseline were not statistically significant on multivariate analysis for OS. Grade 3 drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 10 patients (18%) and the most frequent were hand-foot skin reaction, asthenia and increased lipase and transaminases; 1 PT(2%) reported a grade 4 AE (rash maculo-papular). AEs led to REG dose reductions in 37% of patients and, it was permanently discontinued in 5%. CONCLUSIONS We reported a “real-world” experience of REG in recGBM patients. Results are close to those reported in REGOMA trial; we showed a longer OS. Toxicity was manageable. Encouraging clinical benefits of REG in recGBM population were confirmed.

Lenvatinib versus Sorafenib as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-institutional matched case-control study.

Advanced Hepatocarcinoma (HCC) is an important health problem worldwide. Recently, the REFLECT trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of Lenvatinib compared to Sorafenib in I line setting, thus leading to the approval of new first-line standard of care, along with Sorafenib. With aim to evaluate the optimal choice between Sorafenib and Lenvatinib as primary treatment in clinical practice, we performed a multicentric analysis with the propensity score matching on 184 HCC patients. The median overall survival (OS) were 15.2 and 10.5months for Lenvatinib and Sorafenib arm, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 and 4.5months for Lenvatinib and Sorafenib arm, respectively. Patients treated with Lenvatinib showed a 36% reduction of death risk (p=0.0156), a 29% reduction of progression risk (p=0.0446), a higher response rate (p<0.00001) and a higher disease control rate (p=0.002). Sorafenib showed to be correlated with more hand-foot skin reaction and Lenvatinib with more hypertension and fatigue. We highlighted the prognostic role of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and eosinophils for Sorafenib. Conversely, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) resulted prognostic in Lenvatinib arm. Finally, we highlighted the positive predictive role of albumin>Normal Value (NV), ECOG>0, NLR<3, absence of Hepatitis C Virus positivity, and presence of portal vein thrombosis in favor of Lenvatinib arm. Eosinophil<50 and ECOG>0 negatively predicted the response to Sorafenib. SLenvatinib showed to better perform in a real-word setting compared to Sorafenib. More researches are needed to validate the predictor factors of response to Lenvatinib rather than Sorafenib.

Optimal timing of combining sorafenib with trans-arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

BackgroundThe combination therapy of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib were proved to be one of the effective methods for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although it has been confirmed that the combination therapy can prolong survival for advanced HCC effectively, the therapeutic efficacy and safety are still controversial and the clinical value has not been determined. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and discuss the optimal timing of combination for better clinical benefits. Data sourcesPubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed to search for relevant studies published before May 15, 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of TACE + sorafenib with TACE + placebo / alone were adopted. Two reviewers independently extracted study outcomes. The data were analyzed through fixed/random-effect meta-analysis models with Review Manager (Version 5. 3) software. Results7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included with 1464 patients with unresectable HCC (734 in TACE + sorafenib group and 730 in TACE + placebo or alone group). Meta-analysis showed that objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were slightly improved in TACE + sorafenib group (ORR: risk ratio = 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.08–1.42; P = 0.002; DCR: risk ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.18; P = 0.02). The combination therapy obviously improved time to progression (TTP) (hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.55–0.96; P = 0.03) and progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.52–0.73, P < 0.00001) but not overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.59–1.46; P = 0.75) or time to untreatable progression (TTUP) (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.31–1.89; P = 0.56). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions (AEs) in combination group were higher than TACE + placebo / alone group. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that the heterogeneity of TTP was notably decreased (pre-TACE: P = 0.12, I2 = 48%; post-TACE: P = 0.58, I2 = 0%), and the hazard ratio was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.68; P < 0.00001) in pre-TACE subgroup which indicated that combination before TACE significantly prolonged TTP but not in combination after TACE (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.62–1.24; P = 0.46). In term of AEs, sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk ratio for hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, rash/desquamation, and hypertension was 7.41, 2.58, 2.14, 1.55 in pre-TACE subgroup respectively and was 11.34, 3.26, 3.61, 4.11 in post-TACE subgroup respectively (All P < 0.05). ConclusionThe combination of TACE and sorafenib significantly can improve TTP and PFS, and reduce the level of risk of adverse reactions of unresectable HCC, especially in the combination before TACE.

P14.19 Regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma patients: a large real-life experience

Abstract BACKGROUND Regorafenib (REG), an oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal, and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases showed encouraging benefit in recurrent GBM patients enrolled in the randomized, phase 2 REGOMA trial. We investigated the clinical outcome and safety of REG in a real-life population of recurrent glioblastoma patients treated at Veneto Institute of Oncology as off-label use. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients receiving REG at Veneto Institute of Oncology (Padua, Italy) were entered prospectively on a clinical database. Data were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and safety. The major inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed diagnosis of GBM, disease progression as defined by RANO criteria after surgery followed by radiochemotherapy with temozolomide, ECOG PS ≤ 2; PTS with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy were excluded. According to original schedule, patients received REG 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves, RANO criteria for radiological assessment, CTCAE v5.0 for drug related adverse events. RESULTS From February 2018 to September 2020, 54 consecutive patients were treated with REG and enrolled in this study: median age was 56, ECOG PS 0–1 in 91% of patients, MGMTmet in 53%, second surgery at the time of relapse were performed in 30% of enrolled patient, 41% of patients underwent steroids at baseline. At the time of analysis, median follow-up was 11.1 ms, 30 PTS (56%) had died and 50 PTS (93%) had progressed. Median OS was 10.2 ms (95%CI, 6.4–13.9), 12m-OS was 43%; median PFS was 2.3ms (95%CI, 1.3–3.3) and 6m-PFS was 18%. All patients were evaluable for response: disease control rate (DCR) was 46.3%; stable disease was reported in 38.8% and partial response in 7.4%. Age, MGMT status and corticosteroid use at baseline were not statistically significant on multivariate analysis for OS. Grade 3 drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 10 patients (18%) and the most frequent were hand-foot skin reaction, asthenia and increased lipase and transaminases; 1 PT (2%) reported a grade 4 AE (rash maculo-papular). AEs led to REG dose reductions in 37% of patients and, it was permanently discontinued in 5%. No death was considered to be drug-related. CONCLUSION We reported a large, mono-institutional “real world” experience of REG in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Overall, results are close to those reported in REGOMA trial although, we showed a longer OS. Toxicity was moderate and manageable. Encouraging clinical benefits of REG in recurrent GBM population were confirmed.

Prolonged survival in patients with hand-foot skin reaction secondary to cooperative sorafenib treatment.

BACKGROUNDSorafenib is an oral drug that prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Adverse events, including hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), lead to permanent sorafenib discontinuation.AIMTo clarify the association between interventions for adverse events and patient prognosis.METHODSWe performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients treated with sorafenib monotherapy between May 2009 and March 2018. We developed a mutual cooperation system that was initiated at the start of sorafenib treatment to effectively manage adverse events. The mutual cooperation system entailed patients receiving consultations during which pharmacists provided accurate information about sorafenib to alleviate the fear and anxiety related to adverse events. We stratified the patients into three groups: Group A, patients without HFSR but with pharmacist intervention; Group B, patients with HFSR and pharmacist interventions unreported to oncologists (nonmutual cooperation system); and Group C, patients with HFSR and pharmacist interventions known to oncologists (mutual cooperation system). OS and time to treatment failure (TTF) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTSWe enrolled 134 patients (Group A, n = 41; Group B, n = 30; Group C, n = 63). The median OS was significantly different between Groups A and C (6.2 vs 13.9 mo, p < 0.01) but not between Groups A and B (6.2 vs 7.7 mo, P = 0.62). Group A vs Group C was an independent OS predictor (HR, 0.41; 95%CI: 0.25-0.66; P < 0.01). In Group B alone, TTF was significantly lower and the nonadherence rate was higher (P < 0.01). In addition, the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between OS and TTF in each group were 0.41 (Group A; P < 0.01), 0.13 (Group B; P = 0.51), and 0.58 (Group C; P < 0.01). There was a highly significant correlation between OS and TTF in Group C. However, there was no correlation between OS and TTF in Group B.CONCLUSIONThe mutual cooperation system increased treatment duration and improved prognosis in patients with HFSR. Future prospective studies (e.g., randomized controlled trials) and improved adherence could help prevent OS underestimation.

Efficacy and Safety of the Arsenic Trioxide/Lipiodol Emulsion in the Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Apatinib in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose The goal of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of the arsenic trioxide (ATO)/lipiodol emulsion in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods From December 2015 to February 2017, a total of 87 patients were consecutively enrolled and underwent ATO-TACE (aTACE) combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced HCC. The treatment response and adverse events were assessed at the first month and third month after aTACE therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events were also analyzed. Results 87 patients (57 men; 30 women) were enrolled in the present study. Compared to that at the pre-aTACE examination, the levels of AST and ALT were elevated at the first week after procedure (65.84 U/L ± 22.93 U/L vs. 54.15 U/L ± 19.60 U/L, p=0.032; 63.44 U/L ± 22.50 U/L vs. 51.60 U/L ± 13.89 U/L, p=0.027, respectively). Most of the adverse events were grade 1 or 2 according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE). Of the exception, 4 persons (2%) did have grade 3 hand-foot skin reactions, 1 (1%) had grade 3 diarrhea, 1 (1%) had grade 3 hypertension, and 3 (3%) had grade 3 proteinuria and forced to reduce the dose of apatinib by half. The survival analysis of the combination with aTACE and apatinib therapy found that the median PFS was 10.2 months (95% CI: 8.543–11.857), and the median OS was 23.300 months (95% CI: 20.833–25.767). Additionally, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression revealed that the tumor burden (≤50%) and the patients without portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) significantly impacted the patient's PFS and OS and were related to better survival. Conclusion aTACE combined with apatinib is a safe and promising treatment approach for patients with advanced HCC. Additionally, tumor burden (≤50%) and the patients without PVTT are associated with better PFS and OS.

The Real-World Practice of Fruquintinib for Chinese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BackgroundIn FRESCO trial, a phase III study of fruquintinib demonstrated a significant improvement on the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed to response to available standard treatments. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fruquintinib in Chinese mCRC patients in the real-world setting.MethodsPatients with mCRC treated with fruquintinib at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, treatment, adverse events and survival data were collected. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsIn total, 76 patients were evaluated from December 2018 to January 2020. The median (range) age was 59.5 (34–86) years, ECOG PS 0-1/2 was 86.8%/13.2%, and 38 (50%)/30 (39.5%) patients had experienced more than two prior therapies for mCRC. The median treatment duration was 3.6 cycles. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) resulted in dose reduction were 17.1% of the patients without any treatment discontinuation. The most common grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were hypertension (9.2%), hand-foot skin reaction (7.9%), thrombocytopenia (3.9%), anaemia (2.6%), increased ALT (1.3%), oral mucositis (1.3%), proteinuria (1.3%) and neutropenia (1.3%). The median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.8–6.4 months), and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI 8.0–16.1 months). In patients with hypertension or hypothyroidism, a survival extension approximate to 6 months was observed, but the difference is not yet statistically significant. CEA decreased after fruquintinib treatment could be considered as a potential predictor for better OS.ConclusionThe outcome of this real-life study was consistent with that of the randomised controlled trial. There were no new safety concerns. Future studies of fruquintinib should be conducted to identify patients who tend to obtain more benefits from fruquintinib alone or in combination with other agents.

Adverse events as potential predictive factors of activity in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib.

Lenvatinib is a standard of care option in first-line therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the present study, we aim to identify, in patients with HCC treated with lenvatinib, a possible association between occurrence and grading of adverse events (AEs) and outcome. We performed a retrospective analysis of 606 Japanese and Italian patients treated with lenvatinib in first-line setting and investigated the possible correlation between the onset of AEs, toxicity grade (G) and outcome measures such as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The appearance of arterial hypertension G≥2 independently predicted prolonged OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.93, P=.0188], whereas decreased appetite G≥2 independently predicted decreased OS (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.25-2.32, P=.0007) by multivariate analysis. Appearance of hand-foot skin reaction independently predicted prolonged PFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93, P=.0149), whereas decreased appetite G≥2 predicted decreased PFS (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.77, P=.0277). Our main findings are that the occurrence of arterial hypertension G≥2 is a predictor of longer survival, whereas decreased appetite G≥2 predicts for a poor prognosis. A careful management of AEs under lenvatinib treatment for HCC is required, to improve patients' quality of life, minimize the need for treatment discontinuation and achieve optimal outcome.

P36-7 Importance of checking tinea infections before tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used to treat unresectable carcinoma can have adverse effects such as hand-foot skin reactions (HFSR) with symptoms on the palms and soles such as peeling, erythema, and pain. In this study, we report two cases in which suspected HFSR symptoms were caused by tinea infections. As nurses provide self-care support to patients starting TKI treatment, this report will help support patients' effective self-care. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Japan. A male patient aged 70 years had erythema on both soles by day 9 after starting the TKIs lenvatinib. By day 20, he had peeling and annular erythematous on the dorsal surface of both ankles, and his dose of lenvatinib was therefore reduced. His symptoms worsened and improved repeatedly, and when ulceration between toes was observed, he was referred to a dermatologist who diagnosed a tinea infection. A second male patient, aged 78 years, had ulcers from his left ankle joint to the dorsum by day 8 of treatment with the TKIs regorafenib, and he missed his treatment due to suspicion of side effects caused by the TKIs. When his symptoms worsened without treatment, he consulted a dermatologist and was diagnosed with a tinea infection. Although the application of steroid ointment is recommended when HFSR occurs, it is important to differentiate between HFSR and tinea infections because steroids can make tinea infections worse. HFSR and tinea infections have much in common, such as peeling and the tendency to develop in feet, and it can be difficult to differentiate them by visual examination and questioning alone. The nurses should observe the patients' feet before TKIs treatment and recommend consultation with a dermatologist if tinea infections are suspected.

Anlotinib followed by transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation is a safe and effective initial treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus: A retrospective case series study.

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains a poor prognostic factor occurring in about 10%-40% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for the optimal treatment is controversial. Anlotinib is an novel small molecule inhibitor that has a broad spectrum of inhibitory activities on tumor angiogenesis and growth. However, so far, no studies have reported the use of anlotinib in the treatment of HCC patients with PVTT. Here, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of anlotinib, followed by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of patients with HCC and PVTT. A total of 145 consecutive HCC patients who underwent TACE in combination with RFA were enrolled in the retrospective study. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with PVTT and received anlotinib as basic treatment. The adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs Version 4.0. Time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The most common toxicities related to anlotinib were pharyngalgia (53.6%), fatigue (42.9%), and hand-foot skin reaction (39.3%). The median OS was 13 months (range: 3-18 months) with 1-year OS rate of 64.3%. The median TTP was 7 months (range: 1-12 months) with 6-month rate of 46.4%. Anlotinib followed by TACE and RFA is a safe and effective initial treatment modality for HCC patients with PVTT. Anlotinib may be a promising therapeutic option for relieving and/or stabilizing HCC with PVTT.

Pharmacokinetically guided dosing of oral sorafenib in pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma: A simulation study.

Sorafenib improves outcomes in adult hepatocellular carcinoma; however, hand foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a dose limiting toxicity of sorafenib that limits its use. HFSR has been associated with sorafenib systemic exposure. The objective of this study was to use modeling and simulation to determine whether using pharmacokinetically guided dosing to achieve a predefined sorafenib target range could reduce the rate of HFSR. Sorafenib steady‐state exposures (area under the concentration curve from 0 to 12‐h [AUC0–>12 h]) were simulated using published sorafenib pharmacokinetics at either a fixed dosage (90 mg/m2/dose) or a pharmacokinetically guided dose targeting an AUC0–>12 h between 20 and 55 h µg/ml. Dosages were either rounded to the nearest quarter of a tablet (50 mg) or capsule (10 mg). A Cox proportional hazard model from a previously published study was used to quantify HFSR toxicity. Simulations showed that in‐target studies increased from 50% using fixed doses with tablets to 74% using pharmacokinetically guided dosing with capsules. The power to observe at least 4 of 6 patients in the target range increased from 33% using fixed dosing with tablets to 80% using pharmacokinetically guided with capsules. The expected HFSR toxicity rate decreased from 22% using fixed doses with tablets to 16% using pharmacokinetically guided dosing with capsules. The power to observe less than 6 of 24 studies with HFSR toxicity increased from 51% using fixed dosing with tablets to 88% using pharmacokinetically guided with capsules. Our simulations provide the rationale to use pharmacokinetically guided sorafenib dosing to maintain effective exposures that potentially improve tolerability in pediatric clinical trials.

Clinical Characteristics of Long-Term Survivors After Sorafenib Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean National Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background/AimSorafenib is the first systemic therapy for the treatment of advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and progressive HCC after locoregional therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors of long-term survivors after sorafenib treatment.MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 1,566 unresectable HCC patients who received sorafenib treatment between 2007 and 2014 in nine tertiary centers in Korea. The patients were classified into a long-term survivor group (survival more than two years, n = 257) or a control group (n = 1309). The primary outcomes were the prognostic factors affecting long-term survival. Secondary endpoints included time-to-progression and other safety profiles.ResultsThe patients were predominantly men (83.8%) with chronic hepatitis B (77.3%) and Barcelona clinic of liver cancer-stage C (BCLC-C) (78.3%). The median overall survival was 9.0 months. After treatment, eight patients (0.4%) achieved complete response and 139 patients (8.8%) achieved partial response according to the mRECIST criteria. The prognostic factors predicting long-term survival were metformin use (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 3.464; P < 0.001), hand-foot skin reaction (aHR = 1.688; P = 0.003), and concomitant treatment with chemoembolization or radiotherapy (aHR = 2.766; P < 0.001). Poor prognostic factors of long-term survival were a Child-Pugh score of B (HR = 0.422; P < 0.001), the presence of extrahepatic metastasis (HR = 0.639; P = 0.005), main portal vein invasion (HR = 0.502; P = 0.001), and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (>1,000 ng/mL; HR = 0.361; P < 0.001).ConclusionThis large, multicenter, retrospective study showed an objective response rate of 9.1% and a proportion of long-term survivors of 16.4% in Korean patients. The prognostic factors derived in our study can be used in clinical practice during sorafenib treatment.

A phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OQL011 on VEGFR inhibitor-associated hand-foot-skin reaction in cancer patients.

TPS12132 Background: Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFSR) is frequently associated with the use of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFRi) such as cabozantinib, regorafenib, sunitinib, and lenvatinib. HFSR affects the skin on the palms and soles and is manifested as edema, erythema, hyperkeratosis, and bullae, leading to a decrease in quality of life and interruptions in dosing. The incidence of HFSR differs among VEGFRi, ranging from 5-60% (all grades) and 1-18% (grade 3). To date, there is no FDA approved treatment for HFSR, and marginal benefit has been shown with topical urea or steroids. Although not fully elucidated, the pathogenesis of HFSR has been associated with impaired vascular repair mechanisms, caused by inhibition of VEGF signaling pathways. We hypothesize that topical stimulation of VEGFR through OQL011 will decrease the severity of HFSR symptoms via local upregulation of the VEGF/VEGFR related signaling pathways. Methods: NCT04088318 is a phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OQL011 compared to vehicle control in the treatment of moderate to severe HFSR in patients on VEGFRi therapy. Eligible patients will have ≥ grade 2 palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). The study is expected to enroll 112 patients in two parts. In the first part, 42 patients will apply 0.2% OQL011 topical ointment or vehicle control (2:1 randomization) TID for six weeks. In Part 2, 70 subjects will be randomized into two additional dose levels or vehicle control in a 2:2:1 ratio. The two dose levels selected will be based on the efficacy and safety results of Part 1. The primary efficacy endpoint is improvement of NCI CTCAE v5.0 PPE to grade ≤1 by week 3. Photographs of the affected areas will be taken at Day 0, 7, 14, 21 and 42 timepoints. Superiority test will be performed to compare treatment groups, and the exposure-response relationship will be explored. In addition, an investigator global assessment (IGA) for HFSR will be used in this trial to specifically assess skin recovery and is proposed to be a new evaluation tool. The validity of IGA criteria will be evaluated by assessing the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. The correlation between IGA, NCI CTCAE v5.0 for PPE, and patient reported outcomes including Visual Analog Scale of Pain, Hand-foot Quality of Life questionnaire will also be evaluated. This study began enrolling patients in December 2019 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04088318.

A retrospective study of local hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with regorafenib in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with predominant liver metastases.

e15563 Background: The hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a second/third-line therapy has resulted in promising clinical outcomes for unresectable liver metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). HAIC combined with regorafenib has not been reported for advanced CRC patients with predominant liver metastases. This retrospective study explored the benefits and tolerability in advanced hepatic metastatic CRC patients who received HAIC combined with regorafenib after failure of standard systemic chemotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study collected and analyzed 47 patients treated with HAIC in combination with regorafenib after standard systemic oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan in combination with Bevacizumab or Cetuximab between Jan 2017 and Jun 2020 at the Beijing cancer hospitals in China. Regorafenib was taken for 3 weeks every 4-week cycles and mostly taken 5-7 days before or after the first HAIC. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were observed. Results: Among these 47 patients, 32(68%) were males. The median age was 61 (range: 29-75) . The median follow-up was 22.2 months (range:3.7-50.7 months). Before receiving HAIC in combination with regorafenib, 34 (72.3%) patients had previously received ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy and 37 (78.7%) patients had previously received targeted biological treatment (anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR, or both).These patients underwent HAIC for a median of 4 sessions (range2--8,). The starting doses of regorafenib were 40 mg/d (n = 1, 2.13%), 80 mg/d (n = 11, 23.43%), 120 mg/d (n = 2, 4.26%), and 160 mg/d (n = 23, 48.94%). The median OS was 22.2 months. The median PFS was 10.8 (95% CI: 9.0-13.7) months. The ORR was 51.3% and DCR was 100% among 39 patients whose tumor responses were evaluated in the liver. The ORR was 13.8% and DCR was 48.3% among 29 patients whose tumor responses were evaluated outside the liver. Toxicity profile of regorafenib was as expected, with common AE were hand-foot skin reaction (12.77%), fatigue (6.38%), vomiting (6.38%), and decreased appetite (6.38%). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (4.26%), hypertension (2.13%), diarrhea (2.13%), and stomachache (2.13%). Only 2 patients stopped regorafenib due to AEs. Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrated that regorafenib combined with HAIC was beneficial and tolerable in advanced CRC patients with liver metastases whose disease had progressed after standard systemic therapy. It also indicated a new promising treatment strategy for late stage CRC. Additional prospective and large-scale studies are required for further confirmation. Key words: hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy; regorafenib; colorectal cancer

Efficacy, treatment modalities, and safety of regorafenib in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A multiple centers real-world study.

e15569 Background: For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with regorafenib improved the overall survival (OS) in two phase 3 trials. Regorafenib has been recognized as a standard third line treatment in mCRC. However, the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in real world for Chinese patients is lacking. Methods: Patients of mCRC treated with at least one cycle of regorafenib (40, 80, 120 or 160mg OD for 21 days, as a 28-day cycle) from August 2017 to June 2020 in three Chinese medical centers were enrolled. Data of demographic, treatment, dosimetry, safety and survival was collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: 372 patients were enrolled, of whom 266 (71.5%) accepted regorafenib alone and 106 (28.5%) received combination therapy with regorafenib. In these patients, 75 (20.16%) and 275 (73.9%) patients received regorafenib as third or higher line treatment. Starting dose was 160mg in 93 (25.0%) patients, 120mg in 74 (19.9%) patients, 80mg in 142 (38.2%) patients and 40mg in 7 (1.9%) patients. The maintenance dose was confirmed in 236 patients. Among them, 111 (46.6%) and 75 (31.8%) accepted 80 and 120mg as the last daily dose. Only 50 (21.2%) patients could receive 160mg as a long-term therapy. Median follow-up time was 15.2 months. ORR and DCR were 3.8% and 55.3%. The mPFS was 3.1 months (95%CI: 2.50-3.53) and mOS was 10.2 months (95% CI: 9.27-11.93) . The mOS of 80, 120 and 160mg last daily dose were 10.5, 14.1 and 14.3 months, respectively. Patients received regorafenib in combination with other drugs including chemotherapy or PD-1 inhibitor had longer survival compared with regorafenib alone with mOS of 15.5 (95% CI: 10.1-19.0) and 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.8-11.0) (p = 0.004). The mOS of patients developed lung metastasis and the counterpart with liver metastasis was13.3 versus 9.7 months. The common AEs were anemia (26.1%), hyperbilirubinemia (25.3%), liver injury (24.7%), thrombocytopenia (18.0%) and recorded hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) (19.6%). The most common grade 3-4 AEs included hyperbilirubinemia (3.5%), recorded HFSR (3.5%), anemia (2.2%) and thrombocytopenia (1.1%). Due to most patients was reviewed in clinic, some data of AEs was missing or incomplete. Conclusions: In the real world, regorafenib showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in Chinese patients with refractory mCRC. The dose of 120mg of regorafenib seemed to have a similar survival benefit compared with 160mg. In addition to a better tolerance, 120mg may be a more suitable dose for Chinese mCRC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04735991. [Key words] Colorectal cancer; Regorafenib; Real world

Real-world efficacy and safety of lenvatinib-base therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in China: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

e16192 Background: Lenvatinib has been approved as a first-line systemic for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after the randomized phase III REFLECT trial. The aim of this study was to assess the lenvatinib-base treatment patterns and safety in real-world clinical settings in China. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, A total of 278 patients with unresectable HCC were treated with lenvatinib-base treatment between October 2018 and November 2020 were analyzed. Therapeutic effect was determined using the RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were also evaluated. Results: Of 278 unresectable HCC patients (median age: 56.1±11.9 years), 220 (79.1%) had cirrhosis caused by HBV infection. 215 (77.3%) and 63 (22.7%) patients were classified as Child-pugh A and B class, respectively. 233 (83.8%) and 45 (16.2%) patients received lenvatinib in first-line and second-line systemic therapies, respectively. 223 (80.2%) patients were treated with lenvatinib plus arterially directed therapy (TACE or HAIC of FOLFOX) and 55 (19.8%) were treated with lenvatinib alone. The objective response rate were 34.9% (RECIST) and 47.5% (mRECIST), while the disease control rate were 75.5%. With a median follow-up period of 12.8 months, the median PFS and OS were 7.8 months (95% CI 7.1–8.4) and 17.2 months (95% CI 14.9–19.6), respectively. Results from the multivariate analysis showed that the significant independent favorable prognosis factors were tumor burden&lt; 50% (P=0.033), Child–Pugh A class (P&lt;0.01), AFP level &lt;200ng/mL (P=0.045), the combination with lenvatinib and arterially directed therapy (P&lt;0.01). TRAE occurred in 219 of 278 patients (78.8%), most common TRAE were hypertension (n=118; 42.4%) and hand-foot skin reaction (n=91; 32.7%). The most common grade 3–4 TARE were hypertension (n=23; 8.3%), decreased appetite (n=18; 6.5%), AST elevation (n=14; 5%), and diarrhea (n=14; 5%) across all study patients. Conclusions: In this multicenter real-world study, lenvatinib-base treatment could be accomplished with well tolerated and response for unresectable HCC patients. Combination with arterially directed therapy could likely improve the overall survival.

Fruquintinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer failed in previously bevacizumab-based therapy: A monocentric retrospective study.

e15555 Background: Fruquintinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, is a new targeting anti-cancer agent for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Promising antitumor effect of fruquintinib monotherapy was verified in a phase III FRESCO randomized study of mCRC patients, and only 30% patients were prior bevacizumab-treated. However, comprehensive effect evaluation of fruquintinib in mCRC patients who have previously failed in bevacizumab therapy were scarce. Methods: Forty patients with metastatic CRC who had previously failed at least 2 lines of standard regimen containing bevacizumab in Longhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2019 to February 2020 were enrolled. These patients were administrated with fruquintinib (5mg orally, once daily) in cycles of 3 weeks on/ 1 week off. Furthermore, the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints mainly included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics software and ‘R’ statistical software with the ‘forest plot’ package. Subsequently, the variables were screened and verified through LASSO regression with the R software “glmnet” package. Results: The mOS was 8.1months (95%CI, 5.6667-12.8667), mPFS was 4.1833 months (95% CI, 3.5333-5.0667), and DCR was 65% (26 SD in 40 patients). Particularly, gender (HR: 7.11, 95%CI:1.86-27.16,P = 0.005), age (HR:0.91, 95%CI:0.85-0.98,P = 0.012), ECOG(HR:3.75, 95%CI:1.13-12.42,P = 0.03), medication duration (HR:0.62, 95%CI:0.48-0.81,P＜0.001),and the number of metastases(HR:2.95,95%CI:1.21-7.18,P = 0.017) identified the statistically significant association with OS. Eliminating the influence of time factor, ECOG and medication cycle obtained by Lasso regression were the risk factors for OS. The most frequently reported adverse events were mainly hypertension, proteinuria, hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue and diarrhea, and any new safety signals were not observed. Conclusions: Fruquintinib showed an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer failed in previously bevacizumab-based therapy. Future studies of fruquintinib should focus on identifying the patients most likely to benefit and on minimizing toxicity.