Hand Eczema Severity Index Research Articles

Anxiety, depression and impaired health‐related quality of life in patients with occupational hand eczema

Occupational hand eczema is one of the most frequent occupational diseases. Few data about the prevalence of mental comorbidities are available. Objectives. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of anxiety, depression symptoms, the impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and their correlates in patients with occupational hand eczema. A test battery consisting of the German versions of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) as a specific instrument and the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) as a generic instrument for HRQoL was applied in 122 patients. The severity of hand eczema was assessed with the Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI). Twenty per cent of patients had a positive anxiety score, and 14% had a positive depression score. Higher anxiety levels, a greater impairment in the SF-36 mental component summary score and a higher DLQI category score for symptoms and feelings was detected in females than in males. The OHSI correlated with the impairment in HRQoL, and an association of severe hand eczema with symptoms of anxiety and depression was found in males. We found a high prevalence of anxiety and depression in our study population of patients with occupational hand eczema. Preventive measures should consider the psychosocial implications of occupational hand eczema.

The effectiveness of integrated care for patients with hand eczema: results of a randomized, controlled trial

To evaluate the effectiveness of integrated, multidisciplinary care as compared with usual care for patients with moderate to severe, chronic hand eczema after 26 weeks of follow-up. This study was designed as a randomized, controlled trial. Patients who visited one of the participating hospitals were randomized to integrated care or usual care. Integrated care was carried out by a multidisciplinary team, and integrated clinical and occupational care to optimize treatment, and the patient's quality of life and social functioning. Outcome variables were clinical assessment of hand eczema with the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) (primary outcome), quality of life, patient's global assessment of hand eczema, and sick leave. Average improvement on the HECSI was 22.4 points in the intervention group and 11.7 points in the control group. The mean difference in improvement on the HECSI between both groups after 26 weeks was 10.7 points in favour of the integrated care group (standard error 5.3, 95% confidence interval 0.3-21.1, p = 0.044). No differences in improvement between the groups were found for any of the other outcomes. The integrated care programme significantly improved clinical outcome measures as compared with usual care, and was effective for treating patients with chronic hand eczema.

Hand eczema: Correlation of morphologic patterns, atopy, contact sensitization and disease severity

Hand eczema is a common distressing condition aggravated by a number of endogenous and exogenous factors. Various morphological forms of hand eczema have been described, but categorization into one of them is not always possible. To study the morphological patterns of hand eczema, relationship of atopy with hand eczema, and the implications of contact sensitization with respect to severity and diagnosis of hand eczema. Hundred consecutive patients of hand eczema attending the contact dermatitis clinic of the institute were recruited over a two year period from 2004-05. Objective assessment was done using hand eczema severity index (HECSI) and all the patients were patch tested using Indian standard series. Unspecified type of hand eczema with no definite morphologic picture was seen in 62% followed by pompholyx in 14%. Hand eczema severity was not found to be statistically associated with age, sex, and atopic status of the patient. Positive patch test to one or more allergen was present in 65% of patients. The most common allergens were potassium dichromate (25%), fragrance mix (16%), nickel sulphate (14%), and PPD (13%). There was no significant correlation between patch test positivity and hand eczema severity or atopic status of the patient. Among the morphological patterns pompholyx was strongly associated with an atopic status (P=0.004). Hand eczema was seen twice more commonly in men. Atopic and non-atopic patients of hand eczema had no difference in the severity of disease. Contact sensitivity to different allergens did not correlate with increased eczema severity.

The Quality of Life and Depressive Mood among Korean Patients with Hand Eczema

BackgroundHand eczema is a disease frequently observed in dermatological practice. This condition has negative emotional, social, and psychological effects due to its impact on daily life and morphological appearance. Due to its considerable effect on the quality of life, this disease can lead to depression. However, not many studies have been performed on the quality of life and depression in hand eczema patients.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to investigate the association between the quality of life, depression, and disease severity in hand eczema patients in South Korea.MethodsA total of 138 patients with hand eczema participated in this study. The patients' quality of life was assessed by a self-administered questionnaire using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Data on patients suffering from depression was obtained using the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II). The disease severity was determined during the clinical examination, according to the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI).ResultsWe found positive associations between DLQI and HECSI scores (p<0.05). BDI-II scores had also statistically positive correlations with HECSI scores (p<0.05). DLQI and BDI-II scores both increased with disease severity.ConclusionHand eczema negatively affected the quality of life and mood of patients relative to the disease severity. Therefore, we suggest that quality of life modification and emotional support should be included as a part of treatment for hand eczema.

First results from the multicentre study Rehabilitation of Occupational Skin Diseases – Optimization and Quality Assurance of Inpatient Management (ROQ)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES. The German stepwise procedure of handling occupational skin diseases (OSDs) offers interdisciplinary integrated (inpatient/outpatient) rehabilitation measures [tertiary individual prevention (TIP)] for severe OSD. In 2005, a prospective cohort multicentre study was started in order to evaluate TIP. One thousand seven hundred and eighty-eight patients with severe OSD were treated and educated in five clinics with follow-up before and 4 weeks after return to work. During the inpatient phase, there was a significant improvement in the severity of OSD (Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index, p < 0.001) and in the quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index, p < 0.001). These effects were largely sustained during the outpatient follow-up phase and in the 4 weeks after return to work. Among all patients, 89.4% used topical steroids before TIP, including 52.5% using high-grade topical steroids; 93.2% of the patients were able to refrain from using topical steroids before returning to work. As a result of TIP, return to work was possible for 1587 patients (88.8%). The primary objectives of TIP (return to work, improvement of OSD, enhancement of quality of life, and reduction in the use of topical steroids) were successfully met. The long-term follow-up (1 and 3 years after TIP) will examine whether these favourable outcomes can be sustained.

The use of a measure of acute irritation to predict the outcome of repeated usage of hand soap products

Healthcare-associated infection is an important worldwide problem that could be reduced by better hand hygiene practice. However, an increasing number of healthcare workers are experiencing irritant contact dermatitis of the hands as a result of repeated hand washing. This may lead to a reduced level of compliance with regard to hand hygiene. To assess whether a measure of acute irritation by hand soaps could predict the effects of repeated usage over a 2-week period. In a double-blind, randomized comparison study, the comparative irritation potential of four different hand soaps was assessed over a 24-h treatment period. The effect of repeated hand washing with the hand soap products over a 2-week period in healthy adult volunteers on skin barrier function was then determined by assessment of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), epidermal hydration and a visual assessment using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) at days 0, 7 and 14. A total of 121 subjects from the 123 recruited completed phase 1 of the study. All four products were seen to be significantly different from each other in terms of the irritant reaction observed and all products resulted in a significantly higher irritation compared with the no-treatment control. Seventy-nine of the initial 121 subjects were then enrolled into the repeated usage study. A statistically significant worsening of the clinical condition of the skin as measured by HECSI was seen from baseline to day 14 in those subjects repeatedly washing their hands with two of the four soap products (products C and D) with P-values of 0·02 and 0·01, respectively. Subclinical assessment of the skin barrier function by measuring epidermal hydration was significantly increased from baseline to day 7 after repeated hand washing with products A, B and D but overall no significant change was seen in all four products tested by day 14. A statistically significant increase in TEWL at day 14 was seen for product A (P = 0·02) indicating a worsening of skin barrier function. This effect was also seen initially for product D at day 7 although this was then lost at day 14. Further regression analysis was then performed to see if the acute irritant test data for each product correlated with the skin barrier data from the repeated usage component of the study. This showed that the results of acute irritant testing of the individual products did not predict the results of chronic use of hand soaps. The results from phase 2 of our study confirm the work of previous studies that show that regular exposure to irritants in daily life leads to stratum corneum damage and impairment of the skin barrier. Although significant differences were seen between the products in phase 1 of the study, regression analysis showed that the results of patch testing of the individual products did not predict the results of chronic use of hand soaps. When designing a study to assess the effects of cumulative use of a product on the skin, the study should mirror the use conditions of the product as closely as possible.

Validation of self-reporting of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices

Hairdressing apprentices have a high incidence of hand eczema. Most studies use self-reported hand eczema as a cost-effective method to estimate the prevalence of hand eczema. No validation studies on self-reported hand eczema among hairdressing apprentices exist. To evaluate the validity of self-reporting of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices. During their first 2 weeks of training, 502 hairdressing apprentices were enrolled in this study. All apprentices completed a self-administered questionnaire including questions regarding, for example, current hand eczema, and they were all clinically examined for hand eczema three times during the first part of their education by use of the Hand Eczema Severity Index. The validity of self-reporting of hand eczema was measured with the clinical examination as the gold standard. The sensitivity of self-reporting of hand eczema was 70.3%, and the specificity was 99.8%. The positive predictive value was 96.3%, and the negative predictive value was 98.5%. We found good agreement between self-reporting of hand eczema and clinical examination. There was good sensitivity and high specificity. Self-reporting of hand eczema among hairdressing apprentices is considered to be a valid method for estimating the prevalence of hand eczema, although it might underestimate the true prevalence.

How to quantify skin impairment in primary and secondary prevention? HEROS: a proposal of a hand eczema score for occupational screenings

Skin scoring systems have to meet specific demands depending on their particular settings and indications, e.g. occupational screenings vs. clinical examinations, evaluating progress of treatment or supervision of preventive strategies. Until now, most scoring systems have been developed for severe cases of hand eczema. A validated quantitative scoring system for early hand eczema is still missing. The present cross-sectional study was aimed at assessing the practical value of a quantitative hand eczema score for occupational screenings (HEROS) at the workplace and its potential for identifying individuals at increased risk of work-related skin disease. Both hands of 800 male metal workers were examined for characteristic morphological patterns of hand dermatitis and quantified with HEROS. The score was validated by testing inter- and intraobserver reliability in random samples. Results of validation were compared with three already validated skin scores for distinct hand eczema (Osnabrück hand eczema severity index, hand eczema severity index, Manuscore). The score values ranged from 0 to 82 (theoretical maximum 2260), reflecting the skin condition of healthy, fit-for-work subjects. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was good to excellent. Results for reliability of the HEROS were in line with all three validated scores for hand eczema. The predictive value for identifying persons at increased risk for developing hand eczema was low. The HEROS seems to be an adequate tool for observer near-independent assessment of early hand eczema, especially for quantifying minimal skin impairment. Therefore, we propose the implementation of this scoring system for quantifying early hand dermatitis in occupational screenings.

The Hand Eczema Trial (HET): design of a randomised clinical trial of the effect of classification and individual counselling versus no intervention among health-care workers with hand eczema

BackgroundHand eczema is the most frequently recognized occupational disease in Denmark with an incidence of approximately 0.32 per 1000 person-years. Consequences of hand eczema include chronic severe eczema, prolonged sick leave, unemployment, and impaired quality of life. New preventive strategies are needed to reduce occupational hand eczema.Methods/DesignWe describe the design of a randomised clinical trial to investigate the effects of classification of hand eczema plus individual counselling versus no intervention. The trial includes health-care workers with hand eczema identified from a self-administered questionnaire delivered to 3181 health-care workers in three Danish hospitals. The questionnaire identifies the prevalence of hand eczema, knowledge of skin-protection, and exposures that can lead to hand eczema. At entry, all participants are assessed regarding: disease severity (Hand Eczema Severity Index); self-evaluated disease severity; number of eruptions; quality of life; skin protective behaviour, and knowledge of skin protection. The patients are centrally randomised to intervention versus no intervention 1:1 stratified for hospital, profession, and severity score. The experimental group undergoes patch and prick testing; classification of the hand eczema; demonstration of hand washing and appliance of emollients; individual counselling, and a skin-care programme. The control group receives no intervention. All participants are reassessed after six months. The primary outcome is observer-blinded assessment of disease severity and the secondary outcomes are unblinded assessments of disease severity; number of eruptions; knowledge of skin protection; skin-protective behaviour, and quality of life.Trial registrationThe trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT01012453.

Spoilt for choice – evaluation of two different scoring systems for early hand eczema in teledermatological examinations

Besides improving working conditions and using personal protective equipment, early detection is most important in managing work-related hand eczema. Implementing regular teledermatological skin screenings could be helpful, but none of the published hand eczema-scores has hitherto been used in teledermatology. Testing and comparing two validated scores [Osnabrück hand eczema severity index (OHSI); hand eczema severity index (HECSI)] for their suitability in an occupational telemedical screening. One hundred and twenty photographic records of the hands of 30 male wet workers were examined twice with each score. Results were tested for reproducibility, intra-observer reliability and inter-score-correlation. Examination time, mean score values, and score ranges reached did not differ significantly. The inter-score-correlation was moderate (correlation coefficients: 0.651 for first examination; 0.642 for second examination). In the qualitative assessment, the HECSI showed a better overall agreement between results of first and second examinations. Both scores are suitable for assessing the skin condition in a teledermatological setting. The comparability is limited to qualitative assessment, as the strictly objective OHSI measures the extent of hand eczema and the finer graduated HECSI measures the intensity of hand eczema, adding a subjective component. For assessing minimal skin changes, a scoring system that reduces subjective elements while at the same time it offers a differentiated grading is advisable.

A double-blind, randomized study to assess the effectiveness of different moisturizers in preventing dermatitis induced by hand washing to simulate healthcare use

Healthcare-associated infection is an important worldwide problem that could be reduced by better hand hygiene practice. However, irritant contact dermatitis of the hands as a result of repeated hand washing is a potential complication that may be preventable by the regular use of an emollient. To assess the effect of moisturizer application after repeated hand washing (15 times daily) vs. soap alone. In a double-blind, randomized study, the effect of five different moisturizers on skin barrier function was determined by assessment after repeated hand washing over a 2-week period in healthy adult volunteers. Assessments of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), epidermal hydration and a visual assessment using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) were made at days 0, 7 and 14. In total, 132 patients were enrolled into the study. A statistically significant worsening of the clinical condition of the skin as measured by HECSI was seen from baseline to day 14 (P = 0.003) in those subjects repeatedly washing their hands with soap without subsequent application of moisturizer. No change was seen in the groups using moisturizer. Subclinical assessment of epidermal hydration as a measure of skin barrier function showed significant increases from baseline to day 14 after the use of three of the five moisturizing products (P = 0.041, 0.001 and 0.009). Three of the five moisturizers tested led to a statistically significant decrease in TEWL at day 7 of repeated hand washing. This effect was sustained for one moisturizing product at day 14 of hand washing (P = 0.044). These results support the view that the regular application of moisturizers to normal skin offers a protective effect against repeated exposure to irritants, with no evidence of a reduction in barrier efficiency allowing the easier permeation of irritant substances into the skin as has been suggested by other studies. Regular use of emollient in the healthcare environment may prevent the development of dermatitis.

Contact sensitisation in hand eczema patients–relation to subdiagnosis, severity and quality of life: a multi‐centre study

Contact sensitisation has been identified as a factor associated with poor prognosis for patients with hand eczema. To study implications of contact sensitisation with respect to severity, quality of life (QoL) and subdiagnosis of hand eczema. The study was performed as a multi-centre, cross-sectional study from 10 European clinics. All patients were patch tested, and severity of hand eczema assessed by Hand Eczema Severity Index. A multi-variate analysis was performed to explore which factors influenced severity, QoL and sick leave. A total 416 patients were included, and 63% had contact sensitisation to one or more of the tested allergens. More women (66%) than men (51%) were sensitized. No significant association was found between sensitisation to specific allergens, disease severity, QoL or diagnostic subgroups. High age, male sex, atopic eczema and presence of contact sensitisation were independent risk factors for increased severity as measured by Hand Eczema Severity Index. Furthermore, the severity of hand eczema increased by the number of contact sensitisations detected (P = 0.023). High age and personal history of atopic eczema were independent risk factors for low QoL, as measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index, and atopic eczema as well as allergic contact dermatitis as subdiagnosis was associated with increased sick leave. Diagnostic subgroups were not found to be related to specific allergens. Contact sensitisation was found to be a risk factor for increased severity of hand eczema, as did high age, male sex and atopic eczema.

Staphylococcus aureusand hand eczema severity

The role of bacterial infections in hand eczema (HE) remains to be assessed. To determine the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus in patients with HE compared with controls, and to relate presence of S. aureus, subtypes and toxin production to severity of HE. Bacterial swabs were taken at three different visits from the hand and nose in 50 patients with HE and 50 controls. Staphylococcus aureus was subtyped by spa typing and assigned to clonal complexes (CCs), and isolates were tested for exotoxin-producing S. aureus strains. The Hand Eczema Severity Index was used for severity assessment. Staphylococcus aureus was found on the hands in 24 patients with HE and four controls (P < 0.001), and presence of S. aureus was found to be related to increased severity of the eczema (P < 0.001). Patients carried identical S. aureus types on the hands and in the nose in all cases, and between visits in 90% of cases. Ten different CC types were identified, no association with severity was found, and toxin-producing strains were not found more frequently in patients with HE than in controls. Staphylococcus aureus was present on hands in almost half of all patients with HE, and was significantly related to severity of the disease. This association indicates that S. aureus could be an important cofactor for persistence of HE.

Comments on ‘Validity and responsiveness of the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI): a methodological study’: reply from authors

British Journal of DermatologyVolume 161, Issue 2 p. 482-482 Comments on ‘Validity and responsiveness of the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI): a methodological study’: reply from authors M. Dulon, M. Dulon Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Pappelallee 35/37, 22089 Hamburg, GermanyE-mail: madeleine.dulon@bgw-online.deSearch for more papers by this author M. Dulon, M. Dulon Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Pappelallee 35/37, 22089 Hamburg, GermanyE-mail: madeleine.dulon@bgw-online.deSearch for more papers by this author First published: 21 July 2009 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09270.x Conflicts of interest: none declared. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume161, Issue2August 2009Pages 482-482 RelatedInformation

Comments on ‘Validity and responsiveness of the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI): a methodological study’

Comments on ‘Validity and responsiveness of the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI): a methodological study’

Clinical severity and prognosis of hand eczema

Hand eczema (HE) is a frequent, long-lasting disease with both personal and societal repercussions. Consequently, more information is needed on factors that maintain symptoms. In this study, patients with HE were followed for 6 months from the first visit to a dermatologist to identify factors associated with severe disease and a poor prognosis. Study participants were 799 patients with HE from nine dermatological clinics in Denmark. Severity assessment of the HE was done at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and by patients using a self-administered photographic guide. Additional information was obtained from a baseline questionnaire. At baseline, 60.3% assessed their HE as moderate to very severe using the self-administered photographic guide compared with 36.1% at follow-up. The mean HECSI value decreased from 19.9 points at baseline to 11.2 points at follow-up (P < 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, statistically significant associations with severe HE at baseline were older age (P < 0.001), atopic dermatitis (P = 0.01) and > or = 1 positive patch test (P < 0.001). Being an unskilled worker was a predictor for a poor prognosis at follow-up (P = 0.04), and the presence of frequent symptoms during the previous 12 months was associated with severe initial disease (P = 0.02) and a poor prognosis (P = 0.04). Overall, the disease had improved 6 months after the dermatological examination: nevertheless, many patients continued to have significant symptoms. Dermatologists should pay special attention to patients with frequent eruptions and to unskilled workers.

Validity and responsiveness of the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI): a methodological study

The Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI) is a scoring system for the assessment of the severity of hand eczema (HE). To assess the clinimetric value of the OHSI and to validate the longitudinal responsiveness of the OHSI using the Manuscore as a gold standard. OHSI and Manuscore scores were compared before and after 3 weeks' inpatient treatment of 62 patients with occupational HE. Correlation coefficients and 95% limits of agreement were calculated and the ability of OHSI to identify severe HE was analysed. The responsiveness of the OHSI in monitoring skin changes over time was evaluated by calculating effect sizes. High correlation was found between the OHSI and Manuscore at both scoring occasions (around r(s) = 0.77). Differences between both measurements were within the 95% limits of agreement for 94% of patients, with a tendency for the OHSI to underestimate the severity at very low and at very high values compared with the Manuscore. Responsiveness to change was good. Both instruments showed significant improvement between the scoring occasions. Using the OHSI values, the proportion of classification to the correct tertile of score change was 69%. Effect size from untreated to treated was 0.6 for the Manuscore and 1.1 for the OHSI, with higher effect sizes in individuals with severe HE. Even though the OHSI allows less differentiation than the Manuscore, it shows adequate validity and responsiveness to change. Thus the OHSI is suitable for both monitoring the severity of HE and the effects of treatment.

Hand eczema severity and quality of life: a cross‐sectional, multicentre study of hand eczema patients

Hand eczema is a chronic disease with negative impact on quality of life (QoL). In this study, QoL in hand eczema patients is assessed and related to age, sex, severity, and diagnostic subgroups. A total of 416 patients with hand eczema from 10 European patch test clinics participated in the study. Data on QoL were obtained from a self-administered questionnaire using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Severity was assessed by a scoring system (Hand Eczema Severity Index, HECSI) as well as frequency of eruptions and sick leave due to hand eczema. No significant difference was found between males and females with respect to QoL [DLQI median values and 25/75 percentiles for males and females being 7.0 (3-14) and 8.0 (3-13), respectively], although males were more severely affected than females (P < 0.025). A significant positive correlation was found for hand eczema severity and age (P < 0.001), while no significant correlation was found for QoL and age. QoL was found increasingly reduced when sick leave was getting higher (P < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation between QoL (as measured by DLQI) and hand eczema severity as measured by HECSI was found (P < 0.001). No significant difference in QoL was found between diagnostic subgroups. QoL was found markedly negatively affected in hand eczema patients and was significantly correlated to disease severity. No significant difference in QoL was found between males and females, in spite of significantly more severe eczema in males, indicating that QoL in female patients is more easily affected.

Clinical characteristics and consequences of hand eczema – an 8‐year follow‐up study of a population‐based twin cohort

Few population-based clinical follow-up studies on hand eczema are reported. The aim of this study was to characterize clinical symptoms and to examine occupational and medical consequences as well as persistence of hand eczema in a population-based twin cohort. A total of 274 individuals with and without hand eczema were examined, patch tested, and interviewed in 1997-1998 and 2005-2006. Data on 188 individuals with hand eczema in 2005-2006 were analysed. Erythema and scaling were the most frequent symptoms, and fingers and palms were most often affected. Mean hand eczema severity index score in individuals with clinical symptoms was 12.0. Sick leave was reported by 12.4%; job change by 8.5%. Being in the lowest socio-economic group and atopic dermatitis were risk factors for sick leave [odds ratio (OR) = 5.6; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5-22.9 and OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.0-8.1]. The majority (63.4%) had seen a doctor at least once, and atopic dermatitis was a risk factor for more than 1 visit (OR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.4-6.4). Duration of >10 years was a risk factor for persistence of symptoms, which was reported by 67.7%. The clinical picture and consequences of hand eczema vary; however, the majority experience chronic symptoms.

Gesundheitsindikatoren und Präventionsverhalten bei älteren Beschäftigten in der Altenpflege

As a consequence of the demographic transition, the proportion of geriatric nurses aged over 50 is increasing. The present study examines whether the prevalence of skin and back diseases and preventive behaviour differ between this group and younger employees. An additional objective was to record the proportion of older employees with a health- and occupation-related impairment. 2 149 nurses working in home care settings and nursing homes were questioned in written form about their working ability, their preventive behaviour and their health situation. They were also subjected to dermatological investigation (with the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index - OHSI) and orthopaedic investigation (based on the multiple-step inventory of examinations). Older nurses more often rated their working ability as "(fairly) poor" than did younger nurses. This applied both to physical demands (11 vs. 4%) and to psychological demands (10 vs. 5%). They were also more affected by symptoms in the cervical spine (28 vs. 13%) and the lumbar spine (56 vs. 37%). Hand eczema was not more prevalent in older nurses. The state of health of 10% of the nurses aged over 50 indicated a health- and occupation-related impairment in regard to work ability and back complaints. Roughly equal proportions of the younger and older groups participated in measures for the primary prevention of back symptoms. The older nurses participated more often in advisory sessions on skin protection and more frequently applied cream to their hands. The younger nurses were in skin contact with water or fluids for shorter periods and more often exclusively used disinfectants after patient contact. Geriatric nurses with a health- and occupation-related impairment require intensive measures to support their health and to prevent health damage and to stop them from leaving work prematurely. If at all possible, these measures should not be restricted to a single social insurance agency. The individual preventive behaviour to avoid occupational back symptoms is not dependent on age. An age effect was observed for individual measures to protect the skin. Nevertheless, these had no effect on the risk of disease. The results indicate that more attention should be given to older employees during occupational training.