Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Research Articles

Selective clamping hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: A novel technique.

PurposeIn this study, we described our initial experience and analyze the learning curve of segmental renal artery branch clamping with hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) using special instruments.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of consecutive cases of hand-assisted laparoscopic PN (LPN) between May 2015 and April 2018. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative details, postoperative complications, and warm ischemic time for segmental artery branch clamping were included in our analysis. We used the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to generate learning curves.ResultsSegmental renal artery branch clamping was successfully completed in 16 of 20 patients. The median tumor size was 2.9 cm (range, 1.7–7.0 cm), median operation time was 185 minutes (range, 140–245 minutes), median blood loss was 291 mL (range, 100–600 mL), and median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 4–7 days). The median selective ischemic time was 21 minutes (range, 16–35 minutes). No patient had postoperative complications, acute or delayed bleeding. The median pre- and postoperative serum creatinine levels (0.91 and 0.98 mg/dL, respectively), and the pre- and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (89.7 and 79.6 mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) were similar. Upon visual assessment of the CUSUM plots, a downward inflection point for decreasing total operation time was observed in the 9th case and estimated blood loss in the 12th case.ConclusionsOur study shows that segmental renal artery branch clamping hand-assisted LPN for localized renal tumors is feasible, safe, and has a relatively short learning curve.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in patients with T1 renal tumor: Comparative perioperative, functional and oncological outcome

Objective: Studies comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for T1 kidney tumors are scarce. This study investigated the perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes of these methods. Materials and methods: A prospective institutional kidney tumor register was used to identify patients between January 2006 and May 2014 undergoing HALPN (n = 139) or OPN (n = 165) for tumors 7 cm or smaller with non-absolute indication for nephron-sparing surgery. The outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Results: HALPN and OPN groups were similar with regard to tumor characteristics but HALPN patients were 2 years younger (p = 0.001) and had less comorbidity. Fewer intraoperative complications were encountered in HALPN than in OPN patients (7.2% vs 12.7%, p = 0.043). HALPN patients had less all-grade postoperative 30 day complications than OPN patients (27% vs 41%, p = 0.037), but there was no significant difference in Clavien 3–5 complications. Glomerular filtration rate 3 months after operation was lower in the HALPN than in the OPN group (7.1 ± 12.7% vs 10.0 ± 12.4%, p = 0.054). There was no difference in overall survival or recurrence-free survival during the median follow-up of 35 months. Conclusions: HALPN is a feasible method to achieve equal perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes compared to OPN in patients with tumors 7 cm or smaller in diameter.

Hand-assisted, conventional and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for partial nephrectomy without ischemia using a microwave tissue coagulator.

We report our experience of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy without ischemia using a microwave tissue coagulator (MTC) for hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN), conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CLPN), and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for partial nephrectomy (LESSPN). We retrospectively compared the results of these techniques to better define the individual role and the benefits. From July 2005 to September 2012, 28 patients with small and exophytic renal tumors underwent HALPN (n = 12), CLPN (n = 10) and LESSPN (n = 6). In these procedures, the surgeon used an MTC for circumferential coagulation around the tumor. After coagulation, the tumor was resected without renal pedicle clamping. The mean operative time was 259, 194 and 174 min for the HALPN, CLPN and LESSPN groups respectively. Two patients (one in HALPN group and one in LESSPN group) converted to laparotomy due to an inability to maintain hemostasis; however, there were no conversions to ischemic partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy. No differences between HALPN, CLPN and LESSPN were noted in terms of estimated blood loss, measured analgesic requirements, outcomes, or complications. We believe that these techniques are feasible and that they minimize the risk of unexpected collateral thermal damage by appropriate MTC needle puncture. When deciding to use HALPN, CLPN or LESSPN, our findings suggest that the choice of surgical approach should depend on the patient's individual circumstance.

Hand-assisted partial nephrectomy with early arterial clamp removal: Impact of the learning curve

Objective. The aims of this study were to present the results of hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy according to the margin, ischaemia and complications system; to assess the role of the learning curve; and to compare this approach with other approaches. Material and methods. Data from 60 consecutive patients were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. The patients were divided into three cohorts (1, 2 and 3), with 20 patients each, according to their surgery dates. Results. The overall margin, ischaemia and complications rate was 90%. The warm ischaemia time was 9.5 min in cohort 1, decreasing to 5 min in cohort 3 (p < 0.0001). The Padua score (p = 0.0287) and tumour size (p = 0.0003) were significantly increased in cohort 3, but loss of kidney function decreased significantly to 3.5% in this cohort. Loss of kidney function of less than 5% was reported for eight (40%), nine (45%) and 14 (70%) patients in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.0185). Conclusions. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with early removal of arterial clamps is safe and easy to learn. An expert laparoscopic surgeon can perform hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumours with a relatively high success rate according to the margin, ischaemia and complications system. Warm ischaemia time could be obtained within 5 min after 40 procedures.

Unclamped hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for predominantly endophytic renal tumors.

To describe our initial experience with unclamped laparoscopic hand-assisted partial nephrectomy for predominantly endophytic renal masses in the setting of relative contraindication to warm ischemia. Unclamped laparoscopic hand-assisted partial nephrectomy was performed on eight consecutive patients from June 2009 to March 2010. All patients had predominantly endophytic renal masses with a preferential enhancing rim noted on the pre-operative computed tomography. The unclamped hand-assisted approach was utilized for no warm ischemia, minimal blood loss, and enhanced visualization of the tumor bed with improved operative exposure. Mean age of the participants was 55.8 years. All patients underwent unclamped hand-assisted partial nephrectomy (ie, zero ischemia). Mean estimated blood loss was 368.8 cc (range, 100 to 800 cc) and mean operation time was 236.9 minutes (range, 175 to 272 minutes). There were no intra-operative complications and no open conversions. There was one grade II (ileus with small pneumothorax) and one grade IV (pulmonary embolism) in the 90-day peri-operative period. There was one positive surgical margin, which was recognized intra-operatively. While our results are preliminary, we feel this technique provides superior visualization and adequate hemostasis while preserving oncologic efficacy and renal function in this patient population.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes and Cost

Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) have become standard for the surgical management of small renal masses (SRMs). However, no studies have evaluated the short-term outcomes or cost of RALPN as compared with hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN) in a standardized fashion. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent HALPN or RALPN from 2006 to 2010 were assessed for patient age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, radiographic tumor size, nephrometry (radius, endo/exophytic, nearness to collecting system, anterior/posterior, lines of polarity [RENAL]) scores, operative and room times, hospital length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), requirement of hilar vessel clamping, warm ischemia time (WIT), pre- and postprocedural creatinine and hemoglobin levels, and complications. Total costs of the procedures were estimated based on operating room component (operative staff time, anesthesia, and supply) and hospital stay cost (room and board, pharmacy). A robotic premium cost, estimated based on the yearly overall cost of the da Vinci S surgical system divided by the annual number of cases, was included in the RALPN cost. Cost figures were obtained from hospital administration and applied to the mean HALPN and RALPN patient. Forty-seven patients underwent HALPN since 2006 and 21 patients underwent RALPN since 2008. ASA, BMI, EBL, tumor size, nephrometry score, positive margin rate, change in creatinine, change in hemoglobin, morphine equivalents used, and complication rate were all similar in both groups (p>0.05). Room time and operative time were significantly shorter for the HALPN cohort (p=0.001) whereas LOS was significantly shorter in the RALPN cohort (p=0.019). Despite the shorter LOS, RALPN was associated with a $1165 increased cost, mainly due to increased operating room time and premium cost of the robot. While early in our experience, RALPN offered no significant advantage in short-term outcomes over HALPN and was associated with an increased cost of over $1150.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Without Formal Collecting System Closure: Perioperative Outcomes in 104 Consecutive Patients

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) paralleling open techniques, particularly closure of the collecting system, can be technically challenging for the novice laparoscopist. We describe operative results and complications of a single surgeon, retrospectively reviewed series using a simplified method of hand assistance and a fibrin glue patch for hemostasis without formal collecting system closure. We identified 104 consecutive patients between September 2003 and January 2009 who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN). Our technique involves routine hilar clamping after isolation of the tumor and mobilization of the kidney. After resection of the mass, a fibrin glue patch is placed within the surgical defect and secured with bolstering sutures. No attempt is made to suture the collecting system, nor are ureteral catheters placed when the collecting system is entered during resection of the tumor. Mean tumor size was 2.8 cm (median 2.5 cm, range 0.7-7.0 cm). With hilar clamping, warm ischemia time averaged 24.5 minutes (range 11-39 min). Estimated blood loss averaged 220 mL (range 50-1500 mL), and five (4.8%) patients received transfusions either intraoperatively or postoperatively. Urine leak occurred in 1.9% (n=2) of patients overall and 4.3% (2/47) of patients with documented collecting system entry. Both urine leaks resolved with conservative management only. HALPN without formal collecting system closure is a safe and effective technique with similar urine leak and transfusion rates compared with other series. This technique may allow more urologists to perform minimally invasive partial nephrectomy or to do so with potentially shorter ischemia times.

Complications of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Renal Surgery: Single-center Ten-year Experience

To review our perioperative complications during the first decade of using hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy using a sleeve (HALN). HALN is a minimally invasive procedure first reported by our group in 1997. After institutional review board approval, the charts of the patients who had undergone HALN, hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, or hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy from 1997 to 2007, at our institution, were retrospectively reviewed. Standard laparoscopic procedures were not included. The relevant patient characteristics, operative details, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, comorbidities, medications, and complications were recorded. A total of 227 consecutive patients had undergone Hand-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery, and all their charts were reviewed. Of these 227, 134 were radical HALN, 37 were nonradical HALN, 42 were hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and 15 were hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. Complications developed in 59 patients (26%): 8% major and 18% minor. The procedure-specific complication rate was 29% for radical HALN, 27% for nonradical HALN, 33% for hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 17% for hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Complications included blood transfusion in 6%, urinary retention in 4%, ileus in 4%, and wound infection in 4%. From 2003 through 2007 (n = 163), our overall complication rate was 22% (8% major and 13% minor). From 1997 to 2002 (n = 65), the overall complication rate was 38% (P = .02). The American Society of Anesthesiologists score and the use of systemic steroids were associated with the occurrence of perioperative complications. Our results have shown that hand assistance provides a safe, minimally invasive laparoscopic procedure. Our complications rates were comparable to those with other standard and hand-assist series, although the spectrum of complications varied. Hand-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery could be a method by which to improve patient access to minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy by Using an “Open” Device of Microwave Tissue Coagulator

In this article, we report our experience in using an "open" device of a microwave tissue coagulator (MTC), for the hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN), as a safer, more reproducible method. From July 2005, 5 patients with small, exophytic renal tumors underwent an HALPN. In this procedure, the surgeon used a surgical handpiece MTC, which was originally designed for an open surgical procedure, and introduced it into the abdominal cavity through the GelPort. (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA). The direction and angle of the needle puncture was easily and precisely changed in a timely fashion, depending on the site of coagulation. After coagulation, the tumor was resected with laparoscopic scissors and blunt dissection without renal pedicle clamping. HALPN was successfully performed in all cases without any open conversions. Estimated blood loss was <100 mL in all cases. There was no postoperative complication, such as urine leakage or loss of renal function. We believe that this technique minimizes the risk of unexpected collateral thermal damage by appropriate needle puncture and can be performed easily by urologists. The small incision does not greatly diminish the benefit of minimally invasive surgery.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Controlled Study of Bipolar Inline Radiofrequency Ablation Device in Swine

Bipolar inline radiofrequency ablation (ILRFA) is an effective way to control bleeding during parenchymal organ transection. This was investigated in a study of laparoscopic hand-assisted partial nephrectomy in swine. Nine Landrace pigs were divided between 2 groups; diathermy was employed in the control group for parenchymal transaction and ILRFA was applied in the experimental group through a hand-port and deployed into the resection plane. After complete coagulation, resection was performed using scissors. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 32 +/- 15 mL in the ILRFA group and 187 +/- 69 mL in the control group: a 82.9% reduction ( P = .015). The mean blood loss per resection area was 2.53 +/- 0.92 mL/cm(2) in the ILRFA group compared with 17.31 +/- 9.05 mL/cm( 2) in controls; the reduction was 85.4% (P = .005). ILRFA is effective in achieving reducing blood loss and provides a drier operative field for precise dissection.

The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score: A Comprehensive Standardized System for Quantitating Renal Tumor Size, Location and Depth

Treatment decisions for renal malignancies depend largely on qualitative data, including a description of tumor anatomy and the experience of the treating surgeon. Currently characterization of renal tumor anatomical elements is descriptive and lacks standardization. Surgical decision making and data set comparisons would be significantly enhanced by a consistent, reproducible system that quantitates the pertinent characteristics of localized renal lesions. We have developed and propose a standardized nephrometry scoring system (R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score) to quantify the anatomical characteristics of renal masses on computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. The nephrometry score is based on 5 critical and reproducible anatomical features of solid renal masses. Of the 5 components 4 are scored on a 1, 2 or 3-point scale with the 5th indicating the anterior or posterior location of the mass relative to the coronal plane of the kidney. We applied the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score to 50 consecutive masses resected at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score consists of (R)adius (tumor size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, (N)earness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor and the (L)ocation relative to the polar line. The suffix h (hilar) is assigned to tumors that abut the main renal artery or vein. The nephrometry scoring system accurately classified the complexity of 50 consecutive tumors undergoing excision at our institution. Standardized reporting of renal tumor size, location and depth is essential for decision making and effective comparisons. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score is a reproducible standardized classification system that quantitates the salient anatomy of renal masses. This novel approach for the systematic characterization of renal tumors provides a tool for meaningful comparisons of renal masses in clinical practice and in the urological literature.

Single-Setting Bilateral Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

To assess the feasibility and safety of single-setting bilateral hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Between August 2003 and June 2004, we performed single-setting bilateral laparoscopic partial nephrectomies on three patients. A hand-assisted approach was used, employing the same hand-assistance incision for both sides. Renal hilar clamping was not required, as the depth of penetration of all six tumors was only 0 to 4 mm (mean, 1.8 mm). The tumor diameters ranged from 1.8 to 3.8 cm (mean, 2.4 cm). All operations were performed successfully, with no conversion to open surgery. Excision was performed with bipolar forceps, and final hemostasis was obtained with an argon beam coagulator (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) and Floseal (Baxter, Deerfield, IL), without suturing. The mean estimated blood loss was 208 mL. The mean operative time was 246 minutes, which included repositioning. There were no intraoperative complications, and the postoperative course was uneventful in all patients except for a hospital stay of 5 days in one patient owing to transient ileus. Pathology revealed a benign lesion on one side and renal cell carcinoma on the other side in two patients, and bilateral leiomyomas in one patient. All margins of resection were negative, and neither of the two patients with cancer has had recurrence at a mean follow-up of 51 months. Among all three patients, the mean preoperative serum creatinine was 0.9 mg/dL, and the average level at a mean of 35 months postoperatively was 1.0 mg/dL. Single-setting bilateral hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomies can be safely and effectively performed on patients with bilateral small exophytic kidney tumors. We do not recommend this technique if both kidneys require temporary hilar occlusion, but it can be considered if only one kidney requires hilar occlusion.

Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Combined with Caliceal Ureterostomy for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Ureteropelvic Junction Disruption

Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) disruption seldom occurs in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The diagnosis of UPJ disruption is delayed in more than 50% of patients, and it can lead to difficulty in further treatment or increase the risk of nephrectomy. We present a 25-year-old man who was found to have left UPJ disruption 2 months after blunt abdominal trauma and who was successfully treated by partial nephrectomy combined with caliceal ureterostomy under hand-assisted laparoscopy. We review the literature and discuss the possible images to help early diagnosis of UPJ disruption. As a reconstructive procedure, caliceal ureterostomy under hand-assisted laparoscopy can be an effective and facilitated option.

POD-1.09: Advantages of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

The surgical standard of care for favorably located, small renal tumors is partial nephrectomy. Advances in minimally-invasive surgery have allowed surgeons to transition from traditional, open partial nephrectomy (OPN) to a modern laparoscopic approach (LPN). We report our single-institution hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN) experience as compared with pure LPN and OPN.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after 60 cases: comparison with open partial nephrectomy

Partial nephrectomy is the surgical standard of care for favorably located, small renal tumors. As the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and detection of small kidney masses have increased over the past 20 years, minimally invasive management of these lesions has become more common. We report our single-institution experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN) compared with open partial nephrectomy (OPN). Relevant outcome and demographic information was collected prospectively for HALPNs (N = 60) and retrospectively for OPNs (N = 40). A p-value of < 0.05 denotes statistical significance. Average tumor size (2.6 cm HALPN versus 2.6 cm OPN, p = 0.97) was similar. Mean operative times were shorter for HALPN compared with OPN (161 versus 191 min, p = 0.027). HALPN was also associated with less blood loss (mean 120 cc versus 353 cc, p = 0.0003). Warm ischemia time was shorter for HALPN (mean 27.0 min versus 33.0 min, p = 0.035), as was hospital stay (mean 4.9 days versus 6.9 days, p = 0.007). Although four HALPN renal tumors required intraoperative margin re-excision (based on immediate gross evaluation by a pathologist), the final positive margin rate was 0%. A 5% final positive margin rate was observed in the OPN group. There were two conversions from HALPN to HAL radical nephrectomy and no conversions to an open technique. The HALPN minor complication rate was 18.3% versus 32.5% for OPN (p = 0.10). Complications included delayed bleeding (1, 2.5% OPN), urine leak (2, 5% OPN; 2, 3.3% HALPN), hypoxia, and nausea or fever lasting >3 days. Tumor pathology was as follows: 80.7% and 80% RCC, 12.3% and 8% oncocytoma, and 7% and 12% angiomyolipoma, for HALPN and OPN, respectively in each case. HALPN is associated with diminished blood loss, operating time, warm ischemia time, positive margin rates, and length of stay compared with OPN. In our institution, HALPN is the standard approach for patients with small, surgically accessible renal tumors.

Strategies in the management of renal tumors amenable to partial nephrectomy

The laparoscopic approach to radical and partial nephrectomy is becoming the standard of care for treating patients with renal tumors. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN) provides some advantages over the pure laparoscopic approach which include manual manipulation of the kidney, tactile feedback, and timely specimen removal. We describe our technique for HALPN and emphasize the implementation of an in-room pathologist to examine gross margins during the period of renal arterial occlusion. Between 2004 and 2007, 46 patients underwent HALPN performed by the same surgeons. Mean patient age was 59.5 years and mean tumor size was 2.55 cm. Twelve of these patients underwent significant concomitant procedures. Our mean operating time was 173.26 min (range 90-306 min) and our mean warm ischemic time was 28.32 min (range 14-54 min). Average estimated blood loss was 116.82 ml (range 10-1000 ml) with no transfusions. Thirty-six (78%) tumors were renal cell carcinoma, seven (15%) were oncocytomas, and three (7%) were angiomyolipomas. The average length of stay was 5.17 days (range 3-9 days) and there were no positive margins. There was one postoperative bleed (2%) and two postoperative urine leaks (4.3%). In our institution, the hand-assist approach to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has resulted in favorable perioperative outcomes. The use of an in-room pathologist to provide real-time assessment of gross tumor margins has allowed us to achieve a 0% positive final margin rate. We believe that the use of an in-room pathologist during the timely extraction of the specimen made possible by the hand-assisted approach provides a great advantage over pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. This low positive margin rate is also the result of maintaining a bloodless field of resection with temporary renal arterial occlusion as well as the avoidance of visual tissue distortion with cold, sharp scissor dissection.

A case of port-site recurrence and locoregional metastasis after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

A 63-year-old man underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a 4.5 cm right renal mass, pathologically confirmed as type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Two years later he was referred to a specialist oncology center after routine follow-up raised suspicion for metastatic disease. Physical examination, CT, PET, laboratory analysis of blood and stool samples, fine needle aspiration of the hand-assist site, and colonoscopy with biopsy. Locoregional metastatic papillary RCC with port-site metastasis. The patient underwent excision of his port-site and intra-abdominal recurrences, right hemicolectomy and cholecystectomy. Pathologic examination revealed metastatic papillary RCC at all sites. After a disease-free interval of 12 months, the patient was found to have radiographic evidence of recurrent disease in the liver and peritoneum.

Laparoscopic renal surgery in the octogenarian

To describe our experience with laparoscopic renal surgery (LRS) in the octogenarian. Octogenarians are generally suboptimal surgical candidates but the recent upsurge of minimally invasive options for the management of kidney lesions, such as laparoscopic excision, cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), have changed that perception. In all, 26 patients aged >or=80 years underwent LRS at Brown University and the University of Wisconsin between 2000 and 2006. Demographic information, anatomical location, tumour stage, comorbidities, type of laparoscopic approach, management and outcomes were assessed. Complications during and after LRS, hospital stay, analgesia requirements and return to normal activity were analysed. The mean age of the patients was 81 years. The procedures performed included hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (three patients), hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (10), hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (four), laparoscopic-assisted cryoablation (seven), laparoscopic RFA (one), and laparoscopic unroofing of a renal cyst (one). The mean (range) follow-up was 40 (8-84) months. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.5. The average hospital stay was 5.6 days and the mean time to normal activity after discharge was 19 days. There were two major and five minor complications. Nineteen of 22 patients evaluable had no evidence of disease at the last follow-up. The three deceased patients died of unrelated causes. LRS in the octogenarian is safe to perform in patients with multiple comorbidities. The major and minor complication rates were 7% and 19%, respectively. Recent trends show that ablative procedures are being performed more commonly than surgical excision in this age group.

Case Report: Technical and Functional Implications of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in a Patient with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

We describe laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a patient with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Reconstruction was accomplished despite the abnormal quality of the renal tissue. In this patient, with borderline renal function, the warm-ischemia time (50 minutes) was longer than the normally accepted time and was poorly tolerated. In order to avoid the damaging effects of warm ischemia, alternatives to hilar clamping should be employed, and open partial nephrectomy should be considered.

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Hand-Assisted Technique

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a challenging procedure that has become more popular as techniques have evolved and made the procedure more standardized. We present our hand-assisted technique for LPN. In order to meet the challenges of larger, deeper lesions and to address complications, our technique has evolved from pure hand assistance to hand assistance with hilar clamping and hemostatic adjuncts. We discuss patient selection, preparation and access, renal exposure, preparation of hemostatic agents, resection of the mass, hemostasis, and closure. The results of 76 hand-assisted LPNs (HALPNs) are summarized. While our technique will undoubtedly continue to evolve, HALPN appears to be safe and effective for minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.