This paper reports the results of an experimental examination using X-rays to test annealing materials for lapped bearing steel (STB2), to confirm the validity of the weighted averaging analysis method. The distribution behavior for the αψ-sin2ψ diagram and the presence or absence of differences in the peak method, half-value breadth method, and centroid method were investigated. When lapping the annealed bearing steel (STB2) material, a residual stress state with a non-directional steep gradient appeared in the surface layer, and it was found that the weighted averaging analysis method was effective. If there is a steep stress gradient, the sin2ψ diagram is curved and the diffraction intensity distribution curve becomes asymmetric, resulting in a difference between the peak method, half-value breadth method, and centroid method. This phenomenon was evident when the stress gradient was more than 2~3 kg/mm2/µm. In this case, if the position of the diffraction line is determined using the centroid method and the weighted averaging analysis method is applied, the stress value on the surface and the stress gradient under the surface can be obtained more accurately. When the stress gradient becomes a problem, since the curvature of the sin2ψ diagram appears clearly in the region of sin2ψ > 0.5, it is necessary to increase the inclination angle ψ as much as possible. In the case of a lapping layer, a more accurate value can be obtained by considering σ3 in the weighted averaging analysis method. In an isotropic biaxial residual stress state, the presence or absence of σ3 can be determined as the presence or absence of strain for sin2ψ≈0.4.